French physician and pharmacist Michel de Nostredame, also known as Nostradamus, became famous during his lifetime after publishing a long series of prophecies that continue to mystify the public to this day. Most of Nostradamus’ predictions are written in a very difficult to understand form, which gives incredible possibilities for interpretation. This is largely because Nostradamus wrote his predictions in convoluted quatrains that can be reinterpreted endlessly. But is there any truth in his predictions? Was Nostradamus a genuine seer who could predict the future, or was he simply a clever wordsmith whose ambiguous poetry could be interpreted in myriad ways? A lesser-explored theory, however, suggests a different explanation for his abilities. What if Nostradamus wasn’t predicting the future as we understand it, but was instead a remote viewer—someone able to access events or places beyond the normal limits of space and time? This is not just a fanciful idea, but one that ties into phenomena the U.S. government once took seriously enough to study through its secretive remote-viewing programs. To understand this possibility, let’s explore the parallels between Nostradamus’ so-called “prophecies” and the modern concept of remote viewing. Nostradamus’ “Predictions”: Prophecy or Remote Viewing? Before we dive into the connection between Nostradamus and remote viewing, it’s worth clarifying what both terms mean. Nostradamus’ quatrains are typically considered predictions or prophecies. Written in an intentionally vague and cryptic style, they are often interpreted as foreseeing future events. However, some scholars argue that the language of his quatrains is so open to interpretation that their accuracy can only be judged in retrospect. Remote viewing, on the other hand, refers to the ability to describe a location, event, or object from a distance—whether that distance is geographical or temporal. Remote viewers often describe seeing a mental “snapshot” of distant events as they are happening, even though they are physically removed from the scene. Unlike prophecy, which implies a divine or mystical ability to foresee the future, remote viewing is often discussed in more scientific terms, sometimes even being presented as a form of extrasensory perception (ESP). The U.S. military, in fact, took the possibility of remote viewing seriously enough to fund a program in the 1970s and 1980s called the Stargate Project, aimed at investigating its potential use for espionage and intelligence gathering. If the government believed remote viewing could be real and practical, is it such a stretch to imagine that Nostradamus might have been tapping into a similar phenomenon? The Evidence in Nostradamus’ Quatrains Nostradamus’ quatrains are famous for their obfuscation, using archaic language, mixed metaphors, and symbolism that make them hard to decipher. However, some of his most famous predictions show a startling resemblance to what we today might describe as remote-viewing experiences. Take, for example, the following quatrain, often interpreted as referring to Adolf Hitler and World War II: “From the depths of the West of Europe, A young child will be born of poor people, He who by his tongue will seduce a great troop; His fame will increase towards the realm of the East.” This passage, written centuries before Hitler’s rise to power, has been taken to describe Hitler’s humble origins, his persuasive speeches, and his alliance with Japan. Whether one believes this interpretation or not, the specificity of the details can be unsettling. A remote viewer describes a scene as if they are looking at it from afar but through a murky lens—details are present but somewhat obscured. Could Nostradamus have been “seeing” Hitler’s rise, not as a prophecy, but through the lens of remote viewing, an ability to perceive events unfolding in a distant time? Similarly, consider the prediction regarding the Great Fire of London in 1666: “The blood of the just will commit a fault at London, Burnt through lightning of twenty threes the six: The ancient lady will fall from her high place, Several of the same sect will be killed.” Interpreted by some to describe the Great Fire of London, this quatrain provides imagery consistent with the event, although it is shrouded in symbolic language. A remote viewer might see images of a burning city, a fire sparked by an unknown force, and interpret it through their own limited understanding, much like Nostradamus describes these events in a cryptic way. Could Nostradamus Have Been an Early Practitioner? In the 20th century, the CIA and U.S. Army were so intrigued by remote viewing that they launched a formal investigation into its potential through programs like Stargate. The idea was that if individuals could describe a distant place or event, even though they were not physically present, this ability could be used for intelligence purposes. Remote viewers were tasked with attempting to describe military bases, secret installations, or events occurring on the other side of the world. To the surprise of many, some results were startlingly accurate. What sets remote viewing apart from traditional concepts of prophecy is that it does not rely on divine intervention or mystical practices. Instead, it operates on the premise that the human mind may have the potential to access information beyond the constraints of time and space. This was the driving idea behind the research conducted under the Stargate Project, and it is not dissimilar to what Nostradamus seemed to be doing, at least in theory. Imagine for a moment that Nostradamus was not “predicting” the future, but rather engaging in a form of remote viewing. His quatrains might be the closest he could come to describing the strange and distant images he saw. Just as modern remote viewers report seeing fragmented, often confusing images when viewing a distant location, Nostradamus may have struggled to fit his experiences into a framework that made sense to his contemporaries. Could Remote Viewing Explain Nostradamus’ Visions? If we accept the possibility that Nostradamus was not a prophet but a remote viewer, how does that change our understanding of his work? For one, it removes the need for a mystical explanation. Remote viewing, although still controversial and not fully understood, at least operates within a framework that could one day be scientifically explained. The fact that the U.S. government once poured resources into investigating the phenomenon lends it a certain level of credibility. What is striking about this theory is how neatly it fits into both the historical and modern fascination with Nostradamus. Instead of being an outlier, a mystical figure whose prophecies can only be understood through faith or blind belief, Nostradamus becomes part of a broader human experience—one that has been explored, if only tentatively, by modern science. While we may never know for sure whether Nostradamus was a prophet or a remote viewer, the similarities between his visions and the concept of remote viewing are compelling. The vagueness of his descriptions, the fragmentary nature of his quatrains, and their ability to be understood only after the fact, are all hallmarks of remote viewing as described by the modern practitioners studied in government programs. Perhaps Nostradamus was not the first in history to access this mysterious ability, but his quatrains stand as one of the earliest documented examples of what may well have been remote viewing—a phenomenon that, centuries later, would capture the attention of the U.S. government. Nostradamus may not have been a mystical prophet at all, but rather an unwitting pioneer of a scientific phenomenon that we are only just beginning to understand. The post Was Nostradamus the first Remote-Viewer, the one that started it all? appeared first on Anomalien.com.