YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
47 w

CNN Devotes Multiple Segments To Pete Hegseth Drinking Beer — On A St. Pat’s Day Show
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

CNN Devotes Multiple Segments To Pete Hegseth Drinking Beer — On A St. Pat’s Day Show

CNN devoted multiple segments on Thursday to coverage of a Washington Post report about President-elect Donald Trump’s Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth, criticizing him for drinking beer during a “Fox & Friends” segment about St. Patrick’s Day. The story comes just as NBC News ran a hit piece — citing a number of anonymous sources, but apparently not bothering to speak to his former cohosts and colleagues at Fox News — accusing Hegseth of drinking to excess on a regular basis. Newsbusters managing editor Curtis Houck shared some of the coverage via X: The Washington Post story about Hegseth also came up on CNN in the 9am Eastern hour, touting the anonymous sources claiming to have worked at Fox News, but left out the fact that the incident in question in which they saw him drink beer….was on St. Patrick's Day pic.twitter.com/LOPkxEDCi0 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) December 5, 2024 And more: And the 6am hour…. “Hegseth has denied all wrongdoing; yesterday mounted a public defense in an interview with fellow former Fox host Megyn Kelly…Last night, The Washington Post reporting this: ‘At FOX News, Hegseth had a reputation as a heavy drinker. According to six… pic.twitter.com/kXV8WmtfUV — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) December 5, 2024 But what critics quickly pointed out was that the St. Patrick’s Day segment was tame when compared to some of the CNN New Year’s Eve coverage featuring anchor Anderson Cooper, Bravo host Andy Cohen, and former CNN anchor Don Lemon. CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE “Has CNN watched CNN’s New Year’s Eve coverage?” Stephen L. Miller asked. Pete Hegseth had some beers on St. Patrick's Day. https://t.co/memDUtPmxd pic.twitter.com/GyctlovkRh — Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) December 5, 2024 Abigail Jackson, communications director for Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) shared a screenshot of Cooper and Cohen doing shots. Also CNN https://t.co/7wgb9ipylY pic.twitter.com/TGQxZFxVaJ — Abigail Jackson ?? (@abigailmarone) December 5, 2024 There was even an entire segment that ran during CNN’s 2017 New Year’s special in which an obviously intoxicated Don Lemon got a piercing. WATCH The most Cringeworthy thing in 2017 so far: CNN's Don Lemon completely wasted, getting a piercing on live TV… #WTF #CNNNYE pic.twitter.com/WtYVADndAo — Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) January 1, 2017 In 2018, Cooper and Cohen did a lot of tequila shots. The Anderson Cooper shot montage you didn't know you needed #CNNNYE pic.twitter.com/QC2YBhUxd6 — Amber Duke (@ambermarieduke) January 1, 2019 A 2020 segment featured Cohen and Cooper, both inebriated, playing a game with Snoop Dogg. What is going on at CNN, part 1…. An absolutely hammered Andy Cohen and Anderson Cooper decides to to play "have you gotten high at" with Snoop Dogg #CNNNYE pic.twitter.com/GRwp0kTm3U — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) January 1, 2021   Others noticed a parallel to the Democrats’ failed attempts to derail the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. “It’s literally the exact same playbook as Kavanaugh. When the sex allegations flame out because they are nonsense, switch to ‘He Likes Beer!!!'” David Marcus posted. It’s literally the exact same playbook as Kavanaugh. When the sex allegations flame out because they are nonsense, switch to “He Likes Beer!!!” https://t.co/90hGHc55jC — David Marcus (@BlueBoxDave) December 5, 2024 “They are trying to Kavanaugh Pete Hegseth. We are not letting this happen! Folks, this is the hill to die on. They Kavanaugh Pete Hegseth? And the swamp’s already won,” radio host and former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino said during his Wednesday show. Per Dan: TREND THIS HASHTAG‼️#PushPeteThrough Dan Bongino @dbongino:“They are trying to Kavanaugh Pete Hegseth. We are not letting this happen! Folks, this is the hill to die on. They Kavanaugh Pete Hegseth? And the swamp’s already won.”@PeteHegseth pic.twitter.com/xTSNchMWNq — MAGA Kitty (@SaveUSAKitty) December 4, 2024
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
47 w

Two Kindergartners In Critical Condition After Gunman Targets Christian School
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Two Kindergartners In Critical Condition After Gunman Targets Christian School

Two kindergarten students are in critical condition after a gunman opened fire at a Seventh-Day Adventist school in Oroville, California, on Wednesday. Authorities believe the shooter may have targeted the school because of its religious affiliation, NBC News reported. Butte County Sheriff Kory L. Honea said that the gunman met with the principal of Feather River Adventist School in the early afternoon on Monday, but shortly after that meeting, the man opened fire, wounding two boys, ages 5 and 6. When law enforcement officers arrived on the scene, they found the gunman dead from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound. The victims are in “critical but stable condition” as of Thursday. The students “have a long road ahead of them” to recovery, according to the sheriff. Scene from earlier this afternoon at the Feather River School of Seventh-Day Adventists in Palermo in Butte County. Two students (5 & 6 y.o.) are being treated at out-of-area hospitals for gunshot wounds. The shooter is dead from a self-inflicted shot. @CapRadioNews pic.twitter.com/KoLeWueZ7a — Kate Wolffe (@katewolffe) December 5, 2024 Honea said that information received by the sheriff’s office “leads us to believe that the subject responsible for the shooting targeted this school because of its affiliation with the Seventh-day Adventist Church,” according to NBC News. In a Thursday update, the Butte County Sheriff’s Office said authorities “positively identified the suspect and are diligently working to establish the motive.” The sheriff’s office will hold a press conference at 3:00 p.m. PT on Thursday. Honea said that the suspect was dropped off at the school by an Uber and had a “cordial” meeting with the principal to discuss enrolling a family member in the school, CNN reported. Feather River Adventist School is located north of Sacramento in the town of Oroville and has an enrollment of just 35 students. “Whether or not this is a hate crime or whether or not it’s part of some sort of larger scheme at this point, I don’t have enough information to provide an answer to that,” Honea said. Seventh-Day Adventism is a branch of Protestantism and has around 1.2 million members in the U.S. and Canada and 22 million members worldwide. In March 2023, a Christian school in Nashville, Tennessee, was targeted by a trans-identifying woman who shot and killed three students and three staff members. Before targeting The Covenant School in Nashville, the shooter — a white female — wrote in a manifesto about transgenderism and “white privilege.”
Like
Comment
Share
The Conservative Brief Feed
The Conservative Brief Feed
47 w

Exploring the Ripple Effects of Hunter Biden’s Pardon on Law and Politics
Favicon 
www.theconservativebrief.com

Exploring the Ripple Effects of Hunter Biden’s Pardon on Law and Politics

Hunter Biden’s controversial pardon continues to reverberate through legal and political arenas, leaving Americans wondering about its broader implications. The pardon sparked criticism from conservatives and some Democrats alike.bWas the pardon just? Scope and Implications of the Pardon The far-reaching nature of Hunter Biden’s pardon, covering both present and potential federal charges, marks a significant presidential move. This “full and unconditional pardon” comes amid charges of dodging taxes and lying on federal forms regarding drug addiction during a firearm purchase. The pardon sparked discourse on presidential authority, creating a legal shield for Hunter just as legal troubles were mounting. Critics argue that this decision prioritizes family connections over justice principles. With opponents pointing to potential political motivations, the sweeping pardon bears similarities to former presidential pardons, such as Ford’s for Nixon. This action leads to broader discussions on precedent and presidential pardoning power abuse. Hunter Biden pardon 'unprecedented' and 'very unusual,' experts say https://t.co/KY9fPFLncx — USA TODAY (@USATODAY) December 2, 2024 Political Reverberations and Public Response This pardon has drawn diverse reactions. Critics, including Donald Trump, see this as an abuse of power that intertwines family loyalty with presidential duty, ignoring campaign vows. Meanwhile, some Democratic voices also express disapproval, pointing to its potential fallout on Biden’s legacy. Supporters defend it as a necessary defense against a possibly biased Department of Justice should Trump retake office, reflecting deep-seated political tensions. This debate underscores rifts in America’s political climate, gauging the balance of power within the justice system and presidential limits. Proponents argue this bold step was mandated by the perceived Trump-led revival of Justice’s weaponization; critics caution against such heavy-handed interventions. Biden’s pardon of his son, the closest family member to receive a pardon in history, for any offenses over a nearly 11-year period doesn’t have many precedents. The only pardon that comes close is Ford’s pardon of Nixon for any crimes from 1969 to 1974 https://t.co/75XXIxpfRg — Alfons López Tena (@alfonslopeztena) December 2, 2024 The Broader Picture: Pardons Past and Present The Hunter Biden pardon adds to America’s contentious pardon history. This case brings to light past presidential practices where familial ties influenced decisions, stirring debates on fairness and presidential privilege. While Joe Biden aligns with predecessors in exercising such powers, the context remains nuanced given today’s polarized political environment, leaving his decision open to further scrutiny and varied interpretations. As the narrative unfolds, this pardon might define Biden’s presidency in unexpected ways. This highlights the inherent challenges presidents face in navigating personal connections while maintaining political integrity, a delicate dance that demands careful consideration amidst evolving perspectives on justice and governance. Sources: The extraordinary pardon The pardon explained The post Exploring the Ripple Effects of Hunter Biden’s Pardon on Law and Politics appeared first on The Conservative Brief.
Like
Comment
Share
The Conservative Brief Feed
The Conservative Brief Feed
47 w

Why Are US Authorities Recommending Encrypted Apps Now?
Favicon 
www.theconservativebrief.com

Why Are US Authorities Recommending Encrypted Apps Now?

US authorities are urging citizens to switch to encrypted messaging apps amid increasing cyber threats from Chinese hackers. The warnings stem from cyber threats by Chinese-associated hackers, Salt Typhoon. This is one the biggest data breaches ever. Heightened Recommendations from US Authorities The FBI and CISA have issued warning advisories urging US citizens to adopt encrypted messaging apps to protect themselves against cyber threats linked to Chinese hackers, known as Salt Typhoon. The advisories come following a series of cyberattacks targeting US telecommunications networks, exploiting vulnerabilities inherent in non-encrypted systems. In response, authorities are recommending fully encrypted messaging apps such as Signal and WhatsApp, which prevent unauthorized interceptions of private conversations. These alarming advisories follow reports of Chinese hackers accessing metadata and, in some cases, the actual audio and text data from US communication systems. State-sponsored attackers, reportedly associated with China’s Ministry of Public Security, have notably made targeted efforts to exploit these vulnerabilities. The true scope of these breaches remains unresolved, putting a spotlight on the imperatives of encrypted communications. Security Concerns over Cross-Platform Messaging Non-encrypted communication remains a critical vulnerability, particularly concerning cross-platform texting. While text messages sent between iPhone users via iMessage or Android users with Google Messages are encrypted, interaction between these two platforms lacks end-to-end encryption. Rich Communication Services (RCS), intended to facilitate universal messaging encryption, continues to face severe delays, lacking a clear timeline for resolution. TELECOM HACK CHAOS: U.S. SAYS “USE WHATSAPP AND PRAY” Chinese hackers just pulled off a heist on AT&T, Verizon, and other telecom giants, snooping on live calls, call records, and even top-secret systems in D.C. The U.S. government’s advice? “Use encrypted apps like Signal or… pic.twitter.com/RrtFMXI07f — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) December 4, 2024 Security experts strongly recommend WhatsApp, Signal, and Facebook Messenger, due to their comprehensive encryption capabilities. The FBI and CISA emphasize the significance of utilizing encrypted communications, to ensure sensitive information remains secure against cyber threats. Repercussions and Global Stance China has denied allegations regarding cyber misconduct, suggesting these claims constitute disinformation intended to harm its reputation. They propose the US should cease its own cyber offensives against other nations. As tensions rise, the FBI warns of existing telecommunications network breaches by Salt Typhoon, stressing the urgency of strengthened cybersecurity protocols. Chinese hackers steal information from hundreds of thousands of American cell phone users. @WKRN https://t.co/fsIk7GtIuK pic.twitter.com/PTdomTCSwS — Megan Fee (@meganfeetv) December 4, 2024 As Apple prepares the iOS 18.2 update, allowing default messaging app changes, individuals are further encouraged to adopt secure tools. The advisory underscores broader concerns related to state-sponsored cyber attacks, particularly from China, urging heightened encryption practices to safeguard privacy. Sources: Giant Chinese hack Hackers access Android phones The post Why Are US Authorities Recommending Encrypted Apps Now? appeared first on The Conservative Brief.
Like
Comment
Share
The Conservative Brief Feed
The Conservative Brief Feed
47 w

Review of: “Tucker Carlson’s Moscow Interview: Challenging U.S. Government Barriers Amid Ukraine Conflict”
Favicon 
www.theconservativebrief.com

Review of: “Tucker Carlson’s Moscow Interview: Challenging U.S. Government Barriers Amid Ukraine Conflict”

Tucker Carlson set foot in Moscow again, raising questions about U.S. media freedoms amidst the fog of war. The U.S. Government allegedly obstructed Carlson’s interview efforts with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy. Carlson claims the Biden administration is risking nuclear conflict with Russia. Carlson’s Return to Moscow Tucker Carlson revisited Moscow to interview Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, exploring perspectives often absent from U.S. media. Amid speculation, Carlson sought insights into whether Donald Trump’s presidency could influence ongoing tensions in Ukraine. The interview emerged after failed attempts to secure an audience with Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy, allegedly blocked by the Biden administration. The dialogue not only revisited U.S.-Russia geopolitics but also Russia’s views on the unfolding Ukraine crisis. Carlson has previously faced backlash for perceived leniency when interviewing Vladimir Putin earlier this year. Critics claim he failed to press on critical issues, which Carlson attributes to the broader media censorship issues in the U.S. We’re back in Moscow. Here’s why. pic.twitter.com/7FfBhcaIUu — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) December 3, 2024 Potential for Rising Tensions Concerns loom after the Biden administration’s decision to permit Ukraine to use long-range missiles against Russian territories. Carlson warns that such moves are driving the U.S. dangerously close to nuclear confrontation with Russia. He argues that the U.S. is engaged in an undeclared war with Russia—actions he claims are undermined by a lack of government transparency. Carlson contended that Secretary of State Tony Blinken has severed communications with Moscow for over two years, leaving no diplomatic avenues open for easing tensions. Such actions reportedly escalate the crisis point and limit American awareness of broader global narratives. “There’s no graffiti, they’re no foul smells, there’s no bums, or drug addicts, or rapists” Tucker Carlson compares a subway in Moscow to those in America. Something has gone horrifically wrong in The West & people are sitting up taking notice & realising it’s all been by… pic.twitter.com/gqKUHS1TFA — Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) December 4, 2024 Where From Here? Carlson’s discussion with Lavrov touched on topics such as the U.S. presidential transition and its impact on U.S.-Russia relations. Lavrov and Carlson reportedly examined shifts potentially emerging with Trump’s confirmation as President-elect, signifying changes in strategic outlooks. The dialogue is anticipated to intensify scrutiny, not just of foreign policy but of media access limitations faced by prominent figures voicing diverse perspectives on global conflicts. As tensions persist, the international community eagerly watches for Carlson’s interview release, sure to ignite debates on U.S. foreign policy under the new administration and the role of media in wartime narratives. Sources: Tucker in Russia Tucker talks nukes The post Review of: “Tucker Carlson’s Moscow Interview: Challenging U.S. Government Barriers Amid Ukraine Conflict” appeared first on The Conservative Brief.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
47 w

Tyler Perry Breaks Down Over Childhood Trauma During Acceptance Speech
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Tyler Perry Breaks Down Over Childhood Trauma During Acceptance Speech

'He had beaten me bloody'
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
47 w

Nice Work If You Can Get It? What a New Report Reveals About Federal Employees
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Nice Work If You Can Get It? What a New Report Reveals About Federal Employees

Bring on the DOGE revolution. An explosive new report from Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, who chairs the Senate DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) Caucus, notes that fewer than 1 of out every 10 federal employees (6%) work in an office full time, citing an April survey. “If you exclude security guards & maintenance personnel, the number of government workers who show up in person and do 40 hours of work a week is closer to 1%!” posted Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur leading DOGE with fellow billionaire entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, in response to the report. “Almost no one.” If you exclude security guards & maintenance personnel, the number of government workers who show up in person and do 40 hours of work a week is closer to 1%!Almost no one. https://t.co/4IGzbLqP3R— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 5, 2024 Before the COVID-19 pandemic, only 3% of federal government workers did remote work. Now, an astonishing 30% never come into the office, according to an April survey from Federal News Network. Two-thirds of federal employees alternate between working at home and in the office—even as taxpayers remain on the hook for insanely expensive office building costs. An August report from the Office of Management and Budget showed different numbers than the April survey, however. The OMB report found that 54% of civilian federal employees worked fully on-site, and that employees eligible for telework spent on average 61% of their work hours on site. The “Out of Office” report details reasons for concern about the overall productivity of federal employees. Just consider these clear failures by various government agencies: 74% of calls to the Department of Education during the recent FAFSA debacle, with parents and students having questions about the new financial-aid application, were not answered, according to the Government Accountability Office. An Indiana man employed by the Social Security Administration was paid from 2019 to 2022 as a full-time teleworking employee “when in reality he was earning income working as a home inspector for his personal business.” (His mother and wife used his computer to send emails to make it look like he was working.) Don’t expect to get any customer service from the IRS. Only two of the 76 local IRS offices picked up their phones to answer questions, according to a July 2024 report. Meanwhile, veterans in Atlanta faced significant hurdles to getting responses to their mental health calls. Out of the roughly 22,000 calls placed over 12 months in the 2022-2023 period, about 7,200 weren’t answered, according to a whistleblower cited in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. (Screenshot from “Out of Office” report released by Sen. Joni Ernst) At about the same time, in March 2022, an employee at the Atlanta Veteran Affairs Medical Center’s community care office decided to post on social media about taking a bubble bath while “working.” “The Instagram story shows him in a bathtub, legs kicked up with a federal government-issue laptop propped on the ledge. The computer is open to a March 17 staff meeting and the post’s caption reads, ‘My office for the next hour,’” reported WSB-TV, an Atlanta ABC affiliate. What a workplace. Sure, federal employees in many roles can be productive at home. But the report from Ernst, an Iowa Republican, raises serious questions about whether there is any real culture of accountability at federal agencies. Occasional work from home is a privilege—and federal agencies should be careful to limit it to good employees and regularly be tracking performance and productivity metrics. Yet the IRS allowed 138 poor performers to work remotely, despite its own policy prohibiting that. Ernst also recommends the commonsense policy of agencies avoiding blanket policies regarding telework, and allowing managers and supervisors to make those calls. There’s also questions about just how occasional the work from home is. “[P]ublic reporting indicates telework-eligible managers and supervisors at the USDA’s D.C. headquarters have been required to be in the office five days per two-week pay period—which is less than three days a week—since September 10, 2023,” states the Ernst report. Coming in only half the time is wildly different from coming in, say, 70% to 80% of the time. Meanwhile, over at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, 90% of employees only have to show up one day a week to work. At the same time that federal employees are getting able to dodge horrific D.C. traffic and work from their comfort of their homes, taxpayers continue to fund huge, underutilized offices. “Not a single headquarters of a major government agency or department in the nation’s capital is even half full. Yet it’s costing $8 billion every year to maintain or lease government office buildings. Another $7.7 billion is being expended annually for the energy to keep them running. And billions more are being spent buying brand-new furnishings for the largely abandoned offices inside them,” states the report. That’s insanity. To realize just how ludicrous that is, consider that it costs “more than $182,000 per employee a year to cover operating and maintenance expenses at the Department of Labor headquarters,” according to the report. “On an average day, fewer than 500 employees are reporting to work at the building, which costs nearly $60 million a year to rent, operate, and maintain.” Say, maybe that money could be used to help the hurricane victims in North Carolina and Florida? Or to repair crumbling roads? Or, well, a thousand other things? Nor is that the only outrageous expense the report identified. The federal government pays employees based on localities they work in. It’s a good-faith effort to recognize that different areas have different costs of living. But there’s reason to believe a significant portion of government employees are getting paid the salaries for a different area than the one they actually live in. Ernst’s audits “are finding as many as [23% to 68%] of teleworking employees for some agencies are boosting their salaries by receiving incorrect locality pay.” Nice work if you can get it. Clearly, there is room for reform here. Ernst’s report offers a slew of practical suggestions, from moving more federal work outside of the Washington, D.C., area to tracking, as some private employers do, workers’ time spent on their work laptops and in offices. I’d also suggest that local D.C., Virginia, and Maryland governments should immediately invest in a dramatic expansion of the local highways. In-person work and collaboration is valuable, but spending time parked on a highway, as D.C. area drivers do during commute hours, is not. The region’s myopic focus on public transit and green fantasies has led to a situation where people regularly miss time with their families and friends just because local officials won’t build enough lanes and bridges to keep up with the demand. Meanwhile, government agencies need to provide some accountability to taxpayers. Right now, the average salary for government employees is $106,000, according to Zip Recruiter. (It’s even higher in Washington, D.C.: $120,000.) The average American salary is $59,000. “One of the first things that I think you’ll see is a demand from the new administration, from all of us in Congress, [that] the federal workers, return to their desks,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday, according to The New York Post. Musk and Ramaswamy signaled in a November column for The Wall Street Journal that they would oppose allowing federal employees to work remotely. “Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome: If federal employees don’t want to show up, American taxpayers shouldn’t pay them for the COVID-era privilege of staying home,” the DOGE duo wrote. When it comes to federal employees, the taxpayers are the bosses—and the taxpayers elected Donald Trump, whose allies are signaling it’s a new day in Washington for federal employees. It’s about time. The post Nice Work If You Can Get It? What a New Report Reveals About Federal Employees appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
47 w

7 Takeaways From Final Hearing of Task Force Investigating Trump Assassination Attempt
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

7 Takeaways From Final Hearing of Task Force Investigating Trump Assassination Attempt

A House task force probing the attempted assassination in July of Donald Trump held a final hearing Thursday that contained some fireworks, promises to improve, and unanswered questions.  Ronald L. Rowe Jr., acting director of the Secret Service Acting, was the only witness to appear before the task force, which includes eight Republicans and six Democrats. Rowe replaced Kimberly Cheatle, who resigned after the first assassination attempt against Trump on July 13 at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.  The panel, formally called the House Task Force on the Attempted Assassination of Donald J. Trump, focused primarily on the attempt on Trump’s life in Pennsylvania. A second assassination attempt occurred Sept. 15 at the former president’s golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida. After the hearing, the panel voted unanimously to make its final report available to the full House. It wasn’t expected to be made public immediately, however. Here are key highlights from the task force’s final hearing.  1. ‘Accountability Is Occurring’ Rowe opened by saying that the July 13 shooting was an “abject failure [that] underscored critical gaps in Secret Service operations.” “President-elect Trump was wounded,” Rowe said, a month after the Nov. 5 election victory that will send Trump back to the White House. “A cowardly and despicable act killed one person and critically injured two others.”  The 21-year-old shooter killed one man in the crowd at the Trump rally and seriously wounded two other men.  “The recently completed mission assurance inquiry thoroughly investigated the specific actions and inactions that led to the assassination attempt,” Rowe said. “Four areas of deficiencies were identified: communications, protective advance processes, command and control processes, and coordination with external entities.” The “mission assurance inquiry” is bureaucratese for the Secret Service’s internal investigation of what happened.  “Let me be clear, there will be accountability and that accountability is occurring. It is an extensive review that requires due process and the pace of this process, quite frankly, it does frustrate me,” Rowe added. “But it is essential that we recognize the gravity of our failure. I personally carry the weight of knowing that we almost lost a protectee and that our failure cost a father and husband his life.”  Task force Chairman Mike Kelly, R-Pa., later asked Rowe: “Of all the areas the Secret Service reviewed after July 13, what do you think is most concerning about that day?” Rowe said it was the failure to recognize the proximity of the AGR building, atop which the shooter took his shots, and the failure of communication among Secret Service agents and local law enforcement. (AGR stands for American Glass Research.) “That to me is glaring, those are basic tenets, fundamentals of what advance teams are supposed to identify,” Rowe said. “They are supposed to identify hazards [and] risks and then mitigate those risks effectively—either by using law enforcement and coordinating assets, or taking matters and making sure that risk is taken out of play. We did not do that on the 13th. Post-July 13, there was a renewed focus on that.”  2. ‘You’re Out of Line’ … ‘Don’t You Bully Me’ The task force’s hearing was mostly calm until Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, asked Rowe about the observance at the 9/11 memorial in New York City this year, where Rowe stood just behind President Joe Biden.   Rowe reportedly switched places to stand closer to Biden at the 9/11 event. That would go against normal operating procedures, which are to have the Secret Service’s special agent in charge of the president’s regular protective detail stand next to him at major events, since that agent is most familiar with the protectee.  Heated exchange between @RepPatFallon and U.S. Secret Service Acting Director Rowe.Rowe: "Do not invoke 9/11 for political purposes!"Fallon: "I'm not. I'm invoking -"Rowe: "You are, sir. You are way out of line!" pic.twitter.com/LR28SDci5I— CSPAN (@cspan) December 5, 2024 Fallon asked Rowe whether he was the special agent in charge when standing close to Biden. Rowe didn’t directly answer the question.  “That is the day where we remember the more than 3,000 people that have died on 9/11,” Rowe shouted at Fallon. “I actually responded to Ground Zero. I was there going through the ashes of the World Trade Center. I was there, Congressman.” Fallon followed up, saying: “I’m not asking that. I’m asking if you were the special agent in charge.”  Rowe repeated: “I was there, Congressman, to show respect for a Secret Service member that died on 9/11. Do not invoke 9/11 for political purposes.” Fallon said, “I’m not.” Rowe shouted, “You are out of line!”  Fallon shouted back, saying: “Don’t you bully me. I’m an elected member of Congress, and I’m asking you a serious question.” Rowe again shouted, saying, “I’m a public servant who has served this nation and spent time on our darkest day.” Fallon said, “You won’t answer the question.” Kelly jumped in with the gavel and said, “This committee will come to order.” Fallon said: “I’m asking a serious question for the American people. They are very simple. They are not trick questions. Were you the special agent in charge that day?” Finally, Rowe replied: “No, I wasn’t. I was there representing the United States Secret Service. It did not affect protective operations.” 3. ‘Why Aren’t People Saying Something?’ Rep. Jason Crowe, D-Colo., the task force’s ranking member,  noted that a tree blocked countersnipers’ vision of substantial parts of the rooftop of the AGR building, from where the shooter fired.  When he was in the Army, Crowe said, there was a culture of “See something, say something” in case of a suspected life and safety issue. Commercial airline pilots have a similar responsibility, he said.  “I’m struck by the lack of that culture on July 13,” Crowe said of the Butler rally, where a bullet grazed Trump’s right ear shortly after he began to speak. “If you’re a countersniper and you’ve been placed in a position that doesn’t allow you to see entire sectors of the position that you are responsible for, why aren’t people saying something? And it happened on numerous occasions.” Rowe said that “it starts with training, a retraining, a reeducation of folks.” “I’ve directed the Office of Protective Operations to initiate and stand up an auditing capability to regularly send out folks to evaluate how we are doing and also share findings with our office of training,” Rowe said.  The Secret Service head added: “We have to do after-action reports and we have to retrain our people to see something and say, ‘Hey, wait a minute, why don’t we have that hallway covered?” 4. ‘Apathy or Complacency’ House Homeland Security Chairman Mark Green, R-Tenn., also a task force member, appeared indignant as he recalled his own time in the military.  Green asserted: “Going to war, I didn’t give a s**t if I died. What I didn’t want to do was fail. Your guys showed up that day [in Butler] and didn’t give a s**t.” What happened July 13 demonstrates apathy in the agency, Green argued.  “It speaks of an apathy or complacency that is really unacceptable in the Secret Service,” Green said, adding: “It speaks of a culture of lack of attention to detail, lack of sense of urgency, complacency. These are leadership issues. These are command climate issues. What is the command climate of the Secret Service?” Rowe insisted that the agency is addressing leadership issues, including by providing training for the equivalent of a military captain before an agent may rise to a position of higher leadership. “We are reorganizing and reimagining this organization,” Rowe told Green. “That includes making sure we are developing a leadership development program so that we are touching people at the GS-13 level, which is right before—the equivalent of a captain—touching them before they get promoted to [GS-14]. … We need to hit people and identify leaders early on.”   5. ‘Information That This Committee Does Not Have’ Task force members and staff visited the site of the first assassination attempt against Trump in Butler. Staff interviewed over 45 law enforcement officials, examined thousands of documents and transcripts, met with FBI and Secret Service officials, and subpoenaed other federal agents who were on the ground July 13in Butler, said Rep. Laurel Lee, R-Fla. “It is important to note information that this committee does not have from the Department of Justice, including components of the Department of Justice: the FBI, the ATF,” Lee said, referring to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.  The unexamined evidence includes digital analysis of electronic devices belonging to the rooftop shooter in Pennsylvania, who was shot and killed by a Secret Service sniper, and the gunman at Trump’s golf course in Florida, who was stopped in his vehicle and arrested. The task force also didn’t have any financial information about the would-be assassins, Lee said.  Lee said the task force has a thorough analysis of what security procedures could have been improved from the Secret Service, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security. But, he said, almost no information came from the Justice Department.  “In a very real sense, we do not have some of the critical intelligence information that might have helped us even better understand the needs of your agency going forward,” she told Rowe.  “Our mission on this task force is to understand what went wrong on the day of the attempted assassination, ensure accountability, and prevent such a failure from ever happening again,” Lee said. “I would assert that preventing such a failure from ever happening again necessitates that this Congress has access to all of the relevant information related to this day, related to the actual threat landscape that affects not only President Trump but other protectees under your care.”  6. Robot Dogs aka ‘Autonomous Canines’ On what would seemingly be a lighter note, Rowe spoke with a serious tone and straight face about the robot dogs—or “autonomous canines”—at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.  “Right now at Mar-a-Lago, we’ve started using a sensory array, an autonomous robot, that’s out there walking the seawall right now,” Rowe said. “It has a sensor package. We will use it at sites. We started using it.” The acting Secret Service chief said the Defense Department has used similar technologies.  “Those are the types of technologies that have been out there, that have been in DOD world for years,” Rowe added. “We need to start leveraging those resources. So, the usage of autonomous canines down there right now is just one example of that.”  7. ‘That Cost Seconds’ Secret Service agents didn’t retrieve radios to communicate with local law enforcement that were set aside for them by the Butler County Emergency Services Unit, noted Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La. “You had isolated assets on rooftops that had no direct radio communication other than the relay through their command post and their cellphones,” Higgins said. “It would have been very easy for them to have a local radio up on the roof. That didn’t happen. That costs seconds, and impacts the results of the entire day.” Rowe replied that the Secret Service is working to improve that.  “We’ve implemented a PACE—primary alternate contingency and emergency,” he said. “And also making sure, for example, the snipers—our countersnipers—and local snipers are co-located. That’s to cut down on that, to make sure they are standing next to each other so that there is communication between them. Also, we are exchanging radios and making sure we have their radios and can hear what they say.” Higgins responded, “So sharing radios was part of your pre-mission plan for Butler on J13. So the failure to execute the pre-mission plan has impacted us here.”  The post 7 Takeaways From Final Hearing of Task Force Investigating Trump Assassination Attempt appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
47 w

Joe Scarborough's L-O-N-G Defensive Rant On Frum Dispute, Trump Visit
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Joe Scarborough's L-O-N-G Defensive Rant On Frum Dispute, Trump Visit

Even by Joe Scarborough's history of long rants, this one was L-O-N-G—and very defensive. For over 20 minutes on today's Morning Joe, Scarborough raged on in defending his and Mika's approach on two matters. First, on yesterday's show, David Frum commented on the report that some of Pete Hegseth's Fox News colleagues had expressed their concern to an NBC News reporter about Hegseth's drinking. Said Frum: “If you’re too drunk for Fox News, you’re very, very drunk indeed.” In response, after the segment with Frum ended, Mika said: "The comment was a little too flippant for the moment we're in." Scarborough said that Mika's comment "turned into a column," with the headline, "The Sound of Fear." Oddly, Scarborough didn't note that the column had been written by none other than... David Frum.  In the column, Frum suggested that Joe and Mika have been intimidated, and that Mika's comment was an attempt to "appease.' In response, Scarborough went to great lengths in an attempt to prove that he is not a fearful guy. "Let me tell you something. I wasn't fearful in Congress when Newt Gingrich and leadership said they were going to destroy me, run people against. I said, go ahead, make my day. Wasn't fearful on this show. Nobody has once told me what to say here. Well actually, one person did one time. One leader did one time. I said, I'll you what: if you think you can do such a damn good job, why don't you come here and do the show four hours a day? I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine quitting. But I'm going to do my show. I'll do going to do my show the way I want to do my show.  Muy Macho Joe even went full Clint Eastwood, bragging that he told Republican leaders who threatened him, "Go ahead. Make my day." Scarborough also addressed the criticism that he and Mika have received from others in the media for having recently gone to Mar-a-Lago for a background conversation with President-elect Trump. Scarborough's point, which has some merit, is that the very media outlets that are criticizing him are, behind the scenes, also seeking to get interviews with Trump or with people close to him. Scarborough quoted a reporter who said he'd be fired if he turned down an opportunity to interview the President-elect. Scarborough being Scarborough, he also managed to work in boasts about his reporting prowess, mentioning that he had interviewed Middle East leaders, and endured the anger they expressed directly at him, and had sat for an hour in the Elysee Palace with French President Macron.  Scarborough closed with a variation on Sean Hannity's famous encouragement to his viewers, which in turn is from the Bible, "Let your heart not be troubled." Scarborough encouraged his liberal fans, that despite the prospect of another Trump term: "I say this now to people who watch the show and love the show. People who are fearful and concerned. Let me tell you something: we should have no fear. [Do] not show fear. [Do] not be fearful!" Here's the transcript. MSNBC Morning Joe 12/5/24 6:02 am ET MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Shall we dive in? JOE SCARBOROUGH: What you think? We heard about something that happened yesterday. MIKA: You can. Absolutely. SCARBOROUGH: Is it all right? Point of personal privilege?  MIKA: Point of personal privilege. SCARBOROUGH: So yesterday, we had a good friend of ours on the show. And a who's been a guest for some time. A guy who, he knows, has been one of my heroes for years now. A great writer, David Frum. He writes for The Atlantic. David came on the show yesterday, and we're having a good conversation. But we were talking about the Fox News employees that actually talked to Courtney Kube and other people at NBC News, and said that he [Pete Hegseth] had been drinking too much there. And I was devastated. It was a devastating report. And David flippantly said, he was joking, he said, "If you're too drunk for Fox News, you're very, very drunk indeed."  We went on with the segment. And just to let you know how things work here, I was asking Mika, should we address that or not? Because if somebody had said that about any news outlet, we'd usually say something about it. To reference the entire network. So at the end, and I want to get the words right, Mika said this: "The comment was a little too flippant for the moment we're in. We disagree with Fox News, but there's some good people over there." MIKA: A lot are worried about Pete Hegseth. SCARBOROUGH: We also, of course, talking about those people so worried at Fox News about America's national security, that they were talking to an NBC News reporter -- MIKA: Coming forward. SCARBOROUGH: Coming forward, saying Hegseth was not qualified. . . .  This got turned into a column, and a headline, that said, let's see, what was the headline? The Sound of Fear. Now, that wasn't the sound of fear, that was the sound of civility.  And, in saying that Mika had apologized, she didn't apologize. MIKA: No, I didn't. SCARBOROUGH: She simply said it was too flippant. Now, I would recommend, if we're in a stage where, a comment like this causes a meltdown. And I saw George Conway, another guy that we have on the show -- MIKA: Who we love. SCARBOROUGH: -- We love George. Saying, [adopts melodramatic voice] "Read this article, it's going to make you very sad, but you must read it all. Oh! Because of the fearful times we're in." Well, there's some problem with the times that we're in. MIKA: You can't be fearful. SCARBOROUGH: You can't be fearful. Just because some people have said that we're fearful. Let me tell you something. You can talk to anybody that's worked in the front office of NBC and MSNBC over the past 22 years. I tell you, I'm not fearful. You talk to anybody who served with me in Congress. They will tell you: not fearful of leadership. . . .  And I am telling you, "the sound of fear," the apology, none of that is true. But guess what? This is what's been going on now for several weeks. You know, we went down to talk to the President-elect. And people wrote articles that were just false. But you know what we did? We did the corporate thing. Corporate said, don't say anything. Just keep your head down. What did the royals say? Never explain, never complain. Whatever.  . . .  SCARBOROUGH: I think, actually, if they have a chance to talk on the background -- MIKA: I think, actually, they might be doing that. SCARBOROUGH: -- with the incoming President and President-elect, they would do it. In fact, as somebody wrote during this outrageously stupid, immature series of articles that lied time and time again about us, reporters said, I'd be fired if I had the opportunity to go in and talk to somebody who's the incoming President of the United States, and they didn't do it! Ask any journalist at the New York Times, the New York Post. And that's the funny thing, people at the Washington Post especially. Hair on fire media report. How dare they? How dare they? At the same time that the Washington Post is doing the same thing. Trying to speak to the president on background. Trying to speak to people around the president on background. That's what reporters do. And by the way, guess what? That's what I've been doing for years. When I go speak to Middle East leaders on background, some who are not good people. Guess what? I do it to get information and background and give it to you. I bet you didn't know! Cause I didn't tell you. Because it was a background conversation.  When I went to the Elysee Palace last summer, and I spoke to Macron for about an hour in his office about Ukraine, about the EU, about the ability of NATO. About his problems with United States. I did that, but I didn't reportit. The only difference between what we did on that visit and what the New York Times and Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, everybody else is doing is. We were transparent. We actually told you. . . .  You know why I went to leaders in the Middle East who were angry at the United States, and I sat there and I listened to them attacking me personally for 45 minutes because of U.S. policy? You know why I do that? To get the read of the leader. To get the read of where the country's going. [Shouts] So I can come back here and talk to you and let you know what the hell is going on! . . .  But let me tell you something. I wasn't fearful in Congress when Newt Gingrich and leadership said they were going to destroy me, run people against. I said, go ahead, make my day.  Wasn't fearful on this show. Nobody [inaudible.] By the way, I always have Republicans say, oh, they're telling you exactly what to say. No! Nobody has once told me what to say here. Well actually, one person did one time. One leader did one time. I said, I'll you what: if you think you can do such a damn good job, why don't you come here and do the show four hours a day? I'm fine. MIKA: Oh, that's hilarious. SCARBOROUGH: I'm fine. I'm fine quitting. But I'm going to do my show. I'll do going to do my show the way I want to do my show.  And I say this now to people who watch the show and love the show. People who are fearful and concerned. Let me tell you something: we should have no fear.  . . .  We should hold the line. Accept what we accept, with Marco Rubio and other appointments like that. But hold the line in these other areas. But not show fear. Not be fearful!
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
47 w

MRC UnCensored: How The Babylon Bee Broke the Twitter Censorship Regime
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

MRC UnCensored: How The Babylon Bee Broke the Twitter Censorship Regime

MRC Free Speech America Vice President Dan Schneider and the creators of a newly released documentary on free speech got to the heart of the decision that dealt a major blow to Big Tech censorship. For the Dec. 4 edition of MRC UnCensored, Schneider spoke to the creators of the documentary The Bird and the Bee—filmmaker Matt Pirrall and Thomas Pack, Palladium Pictures’s program director and associate producer. The documentary covered satire website The Babylon Bee’s commendable refusal to bend to Twitter censorship—explaining how this choice led tech mogul Elon Musk to purchase and overhaul the social media platform now known as X. [Story Continues on MRC Free Speech America]
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 1041 out of 56669
  • 1037
  • 1038
  • 1039
  • 1040
  • 1041
  • 1042
  • 1043
  • 1044
  • 1045
  • 1046
  • 1047
  • 1048
  • 1049
  • 1050
  • 1051
  • 1052
  • 1053
  • 1054
  • 1055
  • 1056

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund