New research suggests the mixed-species hunting packs have a complex chain of command.

We know something like black holes exist, but what if they're something else entirely?

The proof is carved into clay.

A documentary about the Royal Family and their secret passion for UFOs and the paranormal is out now on Amazon Prime – free to watch for Prime members.   The film is called The King Of UFOs and it explores the Royal family’s interest in UFOs and the paranormal.   Writer and director Mark Christopher Lee recounts a story that in the late 1980’s the late Queen would dispatch here own scientific advisors in the middle of the night to investigate the latest crop circle formation. At one such occurrence the crop circle researcher Colin Andrews was with a Japanese film crew in Wiltshire and got word that the Queen was interested in what was happening. A couple of hours later he saw a Rolls Royce turn up and half expected her majesty to get out of the car, only to find out it was her chief scientific advisor!   Also in the film retired CID detective John Hanson recounts how the Queen and Prince Philip both had a passionate  interest in the Rendelsham Ufo case from 1980 – which has been dubbed the British Roswell. Allegedly a UFO landed in the forest at Rendelsham over Christmas weekend in 1980. Airforce personnel from nearby RAF Bentwaters, which was a US NATO base at the time, went to investigate and saw strange orbs and beams of light shining through the forest.    Hanson tells in the film how he corresponded with them regarding this case and they particularly liked his books that he’d written on Rendelsham with Colonel Halt who was Deputy  Commander of the base at the time of the incident. Halt had taken his dictaphone with him when investigating the lights and recorded what he saw. He is still convinced that something out  of the ordinary happened that weekend. The letters from the Queen and Prince Philip to Hanson are featured in the film and show that they had their own library of UFO and paranormal books!   Mark Christopher Lee the director of the film states:   “What I wanted to show in this film is how passionate and serious the senior royals were on the subject of UFOs. They had to keep this mostly a secret because of possible ridicule but if such high standing, balanced people, took them seriously why can’t we? There is something that pilots and police officers are seeing in the skies that can’t be explained so why can’t the British government take them seriously?” The film also looks at the testimony an evidence  from former Naval diver Dan Costello who claims in 1975 to have seen Prince Charles fly a UFO craft in Nova Scotia! Costello claims in the film that Charles was one of 3 pilots in a dome shaped craft that had a strange electro magnetic propulsion powering it and had a trailing blue ionic flame. Film-maker Mark Christopher Lee: “Costello’s testimony is fantastical but we have verified a lot of the information and evidence that he provided and I have also written to King Charles to verify the version of events. If they are true then we have to question what sort of technology was this and why was Charles flying it?” Former Ministry Of Defence officer Nick Pope looks at the role that King Charles would play if we had first contact. “He would have an important role to play as head of state and head of the Anglican Church. People will look to him to provide a lead in how we react and deal with being visited by extra terrestrials.” The film can be streamed here:   https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/video/detail/B0DH7CZXTC/ref=atv_dp_share_cu_r The post The Queen Sent Advisors To Report On Latest Crop Circles And Was Fascinated By The British Roswell! appeared first on Anomalien.com.

The latest Washington Week with The Atlantic, the journalistic political roundtable airing every Friday evening on tax-funded PBS, featured Atlantic magazine journalist Caitlin Dickerson accusing Donald Trump of not just racism, but using the rhetoric of “fascist neo-Nazi groups,” for his insistence on enforcing the borders and lowering immigration levels from certain world regions. This is PBS in fall campaign mode, as in "don't vote for the neo-Nazi!"  Host Jeffrey Goldberg: So, Caitlin, you have tracked more than anyone I know Trump policies, the Trump record during his term in office, and the ideological leanings, or the language used to talk about immigration and immigrants, starting with Donald Trump, but Stephen Miller, and, of course, the whole coterie of people around them who focused on immigration. I`m wondering if that language that you heard strikes you as harsher than what we’ve heard before…. Caitlin Dickerson, Staff Writer, The Atlantic: Harsh, I want to say, isn’t even strong enough. It`s not -- this isn`t a spectrum of escalation about becoming harsher against immigration in a punitive way. I think, really, it`s a transformation toward very bald expressions of racism and xenophobia. I mean, I think that tape was Trump all but saying, when he points to people from the Congo, the Middle East and Asia, and then says they`re destroying the fabric of our country, what is that? What is the fabric meant to, refer to? It refers to whiteness, right? And not only that, he's obviously said on the campaign trail, as you know, immigrants are poisoning the blood of America, that they’re animals, that they’re not human. I mean this is the territory of fascist neo-Nazi groups…. Trump was referring to the bloodthirsty MS-13 gang as animals, as Dickerson surely knows and even liberal fact-checkers admitted. Is Dickerson really opposed to harsh language being applied to MS-13? Goldberg: ….I think you’re suggesting that Trump, in these last weeks of the election, is moving closer to articulating the Great Replacement Theory, the so-called Great Replacement Theory, that there’s a plot, and, obviously, sometimes it’s considered a Jewish plot, sometimes it`s just sort of a general plot, to literally replace the whites of America with brown and black people. Dickerson: That’s exactly right. Goldberg: I mean, do you -- is that what you’re hearing, like we’re moving toward, which is of course, not a right-wing position, it’s kind of an authoritarian? Dickerson: That`s exactly what I`m saying, and why I think harsh is not a strong enough word to describe the language that Trump is using. I mean, so the Great Replacement Theory has always been on the scene in Trump’s political career…. Politico certainly took the idea of immigrants voting Democrat seriously in a 2013 article, “Immigration reform could be bonanza for Democrats.” Is Politico also right-wing? Goldberg then asked the Washington Post’s Leigh Ann Caldwell, “what is the utility of going more racist in the weeks leading up to the election?” After Caldwell answered, Dickerson again piped up by throwing up an old accusation. "To basically scare them off of the couch, right? I mean in that sense, it's a Willie Horton type" of attack. Back in 1988, the Left thought it was somehow racist for Republicans to talk about a black man convicted of a vicious gas-station murder getting a weekend furlough from Gov. Michael Dukakis. Horton traveled to Maryland and kidnapped a young couple, stabbing the man and repeatedly raping his girlfriend.

Just 11 days ago, we caught David Frum on CNN virtually stamping his feet in frustration at the prospect that Donald Trump had a good chance of winning the election. Frum fumed over the "probably stupid" American system under which a candidate can lose the popular vote but still win the presidency in the Electoral College.  Frum, who in addition to being a CNN regular writes for The Atlantic, was in a much more sanguine mood on today's CNN This Morning. Citing one new poll that shows Kamala Harris with a five-point lead over Trump. Frum analogized the race to that of 1980, in which it was "close, close, close" until Reagan pulled away from Carter in the last month-and-a-half. Frum sees Harris as the candidate now pulling away. Frum was, in essence, predicting a Kamala victory. And he wondered what lesson the Trump campaign, and by extension Republicans at large, would learn from the loss. Would they conclude that Trump lost because he was older and didn't work hard enough, and that the party simply needs to find a younger, harder-working version of Trump? Or will they realize that, according to Frum: "[Trump's] kind of authoritarian, racist, corrupt style of politics doesn't work. It doesn't work in North Carolina. It doesn't work for Donald Trump. And it doesn't work when you give it a law degree and a better haircut and J.D. Vance." Nasty stuff. Frum reached back 44 years for his Reagan-Carter analogy. It wouldn't have suited his argument to look to a much more recent election, that of 2016. There, the poll consensus was that Hillary Clinton would win rather easily. FiveThirtyEight's final prediction gave her a 71.4% chance of winning, Trump a meager 28.6%.  And speaking of pulling away, FiveThirtyEight's polling of the popular vote showed Hillary getting a notable bump in the final days, and an Electoral College mini-landslide of 302-235. So confident of a Clinton win were the pollsters and Hillary that she chose for her anticipated Election Night victory speech a venue that literally had . . . a glass ceiling.  We all know how that turned out.  Here's the transcript. CNN This Morning  9/23/24 6:05 am EDT DAVID FRUM: We opened this segment by saying there there are new polling this weekend that show Kamala Harris probably five percentage points ahead of Donald Trump in the polling, but it's closer in the battleground states.  Now what if we rephrase that? Kamala Harris is five points ahead in national polling, which translates to an advantage of probably seven or eight million votes. But in the states where it's close, it's close. Because the way you get to be a battleground state is the state where it's close. But this election is widening. And it's very much what happened, I think, this year, what happened in 1980 with Ronald Reagan, where between Reagan and Carter, it was close, close, close until suddenly, it wasn't close in the last month-and-a-half of the election, when the leader pulled away. What we're watching is the leader pulling away.  And I think one of the questions I am contemplating is, when it's all said and done, will the Trump campaign say the problem was that the president was kind of older and he didn't, he got lazy. He didn't work very hard, and we need to find a harder working, younger Trump? Or do they learn some real lessons here? About what the country is like, and that this kind of authoritarian, racist, corrupt style of politics doesn't work. It doesn't work in North Carolina. It doesn't work for Donald Trump. And it doesn't work when you give it a law degree and a at a better haircut and J.D. Vance.

Meta may finally permit free speech on social issues on its platforms after years of suppressing Facebook and Instagram users who push back against gender ideology. Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta opened up two free speech cases on Facebook and Instagram to public comment on Aug. 29. Meta explained that the platform had chosen not to censor two popular videos shared on both social media platforms, despite a flurry of users demanding the two separate videos be censored. Both of these cases were repeatedly reported to Meta as “Hate Speech” or “Bullying and Harassment,” to no avail. Whether the Meta Oversight Board will also allow free speech remains to be seen. This decision is pending.  The Facebook video shows a woman challenging a “transgender” woman—also known as a man—as he tries to enter a women’s restroom. The Instagram post contains footage of spectators booing a “transgender girl”—also known as a boy—as he wins a track race. In its description of these events, Meta made the cowardly choice to refer to the boy as “they” rather than he and called the man “them” rather than him.  Previously, Meta would censor similar posts on transgenderism across its platforms. MRC Free Speech America's exclusive CensorTrack recorded 57 cases from September 2020 through August 2024.  Related: Meta Oversight Board Greenlights Anti-Semitic, Genocidal Phrase, But Misgendering…Not So Much For example, in 2022 Facebook censored an article by the satirical website The Babylon Bee headlined, “Trans Woman Breaks Jeopardy Record, Proving Once And For All That Men Are Smarter Than Women,” calling the post “hate speech.” Notably, this censorship occurred seven weeks after the content was posted.  Later that year, Facebook removed a post by Libs of TikTok, an account created by Chaya Raichik to expose radical gender activists, for merely alluding to the absurdity of gender theory. "So, what did I miss? Were any new genders invented while I was away?" Raichik wrote on Facebook. Facebook also engaged in election interference, refusing to allow a paid political advertisement against Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) and President Joe Biden. The conservative PAC American Principles Project’s (APP PAC) was blocked from placing a $4 million ad exposing the absurdity of allowing boys in girls’ sports. Instagram even silenced famous detransitioner Chloe Cole, suspending her account in August  2024 before later restoring it. Facebook acted against another detransitioner, Kellie King, a woman who underwent a transition surgery and now calls herself Scott Newgent, removing posts she made exposing the horror of “transing” kids.  Conservatives are under attack. Contact Meta here and tell them to that they did the right thing leaving these posts up on their platforms, but that they must continue to allow free speech on this issue rather than reverting to their old habits. If you have been censored, contact us using MRC Free Speech America’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Tesla's ludicrous mode — which takes you from 0 to 60 in as little as 2.5 seconds — isn't for everyone. Some of would happily dispense with a short-term boost in torque to have a comfortable, silent ride.Until Elon Musk offers some kind of "leisure mode," there's always the new, American-made 2025 Volvo EX90, a fully electric premium 7-seat SUV.You could hear a pin drop in the EX90's ultra-quiet cabin — just the serenity you need to lower stress levels and calm the beast inside. Unlike most of its battery-electric competitors, during acceleration, it does not pipe in a soundtrack that mimics an internal-combustion engine.The EX90's commitment to safety might also ease some tension when you're behind the wheel. Volvo's new multi-camera driver-monitoring system includes a suite of lidar, radar, eight cameras, and 12 ultrasonic sensors that collaborate to enforce Volvo's "zero crash" intent for all Volvos.A new computer-actuated dual-chamber air suspension helps the EX90 feel refined, flat, and planted. The computer allows for instantaneous reactions to road imperfections. The hydro-bushings in the front and rear axle enhance longitudinal damping, counteracting suspension-crashing sensations and creating a smooth ride.A trick torque-vectoring system, new to Volvo, recognizably enhances agility in low-speed or low-traction situations and aids in takeoff performance. As for the suspension and the steering, you can choose soft or firm settings. Exclusive Scandinavian modern design details add to the premium experience of an intelligent car. Inspired by the Swedish living room, the EX90 cabin showcases a modern, luxurious, and uncluttered interior design with high-quality Nordico or Wool Blend upholstery options. The backlit bent wood veneers are Alvar Aalto-esque, clutter is vanquished, and storage is multifarious, with bins and cubbies, including a frunk, a handbag shelf beneath the center console, and a sub-compartment beneath the rear cargo floor.A 14.5-inch screen in the middle controls virtually everything, including simple functions like adjusting the side mirrors and HVAC and opening the glovebox and trunk. The amazing Bowers & Wilkins/Abbey Road Studios premium audio system is most impressive and really stands out.Volvo says it doesn't intend the EX90 to replace the existing gas-powered XC90; it will continue to produce the latter as long as there's demand. Both 2025 versions of the car will be manufactured in the Swedish automaker's state-of-the-art Ridgeville, South Carolina, plant.The twin motor trim will run you $79,995 while the twin motor performance comes in at $84,995. American buyers qualify for the $7500 EV tax credit. Our test car was fully loaded and came in at $93,345.Pros :Elegant interior stylingGoogle-based technology featuresStrong accelerationAmazing audio systemCons:The EX90 is not a driver's car.No real leather option — it would increase the luxuryGlove box opening separate / manualRear-view cameraTo see the EX90 in action — and to get a better sense of how it stacks up to competitors like the Tesla Model X and the KIA EV9, check out my test-drive video below: - YouTube youtu.be

Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker placed 11th on the NFL's list of top merchandise movers, beating teammate and pop culture crossover Travis Kelce.Kelce has been featured in commercials for controversial brands like Bud Light and Pfizer (to promote vaccines) and is famously dating pop singer Taylor Swift. Butker, on the other hand, has made headlines for daring to promote Christianity while standing against woke and diversity-centric ideologies.Earlier in the summer, Butker became the highest-paid NFL kicker of all time when he signed a four-year, $25.6 million extension. This has Butker averaging a salary of $6.4 million through the 2028 season.The NFL Players Association recently released its top 50 sales list, which tracks sales of officially licensed NFL player merchandise from online and traditional retail outlets. This includes jerseys, T-shirts, hoodies, bobbleheads, and much more.Butker placed 11th on the list just ahead of Kelce, who placed 12th.Not only was this Butker's first appearance on the list, but he became only the second kicker to ever sell enough merchandise to make the top 50. The first was Evan McPherson, who appeared on the list in 2022.'I just really wanted to show love and show people what I stand for. I pray for everybody.'While Butker's teammate Patrick Mahomes II was second on the merchandise list, a somewhat surprising No.1 entry was C.J. Stroud.Stroud, quarterback for the Houston Texans, openly proclaimed and promoted his faith throughout his rookie season. Fans flocked to Stroud to hear what he had to say due to his refreshingly open views on his religion.Some controversy developed in January 2024, however, when NBC edited an interview with Stroud to remove his mentions of Jesus.At the start of the interview, Stroud said, "First and foremost, I just want to give all glory and praise to my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ." He then added, "Thank you, God bless," at the end of the interview.When the interview hit social media, however, both sections were removed with an obvious edit, as the camera angle jumped to a closeup, leaving out the shout-outs to Jesus.Stroud eventually spoke to Fox News on the subject after his team had been eliminated from the playoffs, weeks later."I just really wanted to show love and show people what I stand for. I pray for everybody. I don't really have any feeling towards it, I just pray for everyone," the quarterback said."It's cool to see people use their platform to show their purpose and the Lord. I think we have a really good community of a lot of believers in the league, really around the sports world."Stroud and Butker have led a charge among athletes in the last couple years to be more open about their Christian beliefs. In turn, fans have responded by supporting them both on and off the field.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

While the first presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris is fading into distant memory, Megyn Kelly is here to make sure no one forgets it. Especially the performance of the “moderators.” In a recent appearance on ABC’s “Live with Kelly and Mark,” David Muir attempted to clean up his reputation following the debate. “I believe it was our duty to ask the issues that Americans care about. You know, the economy: Are we better off than we were four years ago? Immigration: What are you going to do about the border? Why did you wait so long before you acted on the border? Those types of questions,” Muir explained. “Reproductive rights. Afghanistan. Do you bear any responsibility? A peaceful transfer of power with the next election coming. You know, these are all really important issues, the issues of our time really,” he continued, adding, “I always say as a moderator, what the candidates decide to do with that time, you can ask the question, but they’ll answer with whatever they choose to answer with.” After watching the clip of Muir, Kelly has some critiques. “He’s just playing it right down the middle, Dave,” Kelly tells Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report.” “Let me tell you what that was. That was clean up in aisle seven because his ratings are down 12% since the debate.” “And far more than he’s seeing on the competition on CBS and NBC, they both fell a little this week,” she continues, adding, “just as it wasn’t that busy a news week but for, you know, the whole assassination thing.” “ABC News can see he’s in a free fall,” she concluded, and Rubin agrees. “They’re using one of their entertainment shows, the morning show, to run cover for their news operation,” Rubin says. “As Megan Kelly said, you know, playing it down the middle. And it’s like no, you did not dude. You fact-checked only Trump.”Want more from Dave Rubin?To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.