Do you know how many eggs a woman has? If not, ABC’s Jimmy “non-sequitur” Kimmel believes you are not allowed to be pro-life because on Wednesday’s show, Kimmel and his liberal audience guffawed at self-described pro-lifers not being able to answer questions about female anatomy that they certainly would not be able to answer themselves. Kimmel teed up a man-on-the-street segment by hyping Tuesday night’s debate, “Kamala Harris forcefully defended a woman's right to choose last night, it was very effective, and it got me wondering about how much some of these people who seem to know what's best for women's bodies, how much they actually know about the female anatomy. So, we sent a team deep into the heart of Texas to find out.”     The segment featured 14 individuals, 12 men and two women, and the interviewer began by asking one man, “It's come to my attention a lot of Democrats think that pro-life people don't know anything about the female reproductive system, and I just, kind of, want to prove them wrong. How many eggs does a woman have?” The man replied, “I have no idea,” which was probably the same answer 99 percent of Kimmel’s audience would have given. Kimmel has done man-on-the-street interviews before about female anatomy to mock pro-lifers before, but this time the people interviewed were explicitly labeled pro-life. The problem with such segments is that viewers have no idea what is real or scripted for the sake of a laugh, nor do they see what was left on the cutting room floor because an interviewee gave the correct answer. Additionally, how many eggs a woman also has nothing to do with the ethical question of when life begins. If Jimmy Kimmel Live! ever asks you how many eggs a woman has, you can throw the question back at them by answering it depends on the woman’s age. One clip of correct answers that did make it was when the interviewer put up a diagram of the female reproductive system and asked, “Just identify as many organs as you can, okay? Go.” One man rattled off, “The anus. The vagina. The clitoris,” but he was still laughed at because of the way he pronounced “clitoris” as "cligh-tore-us" so pro-lifers still can’t win even when they debunk the segment’s explicit point. After doing another game of “Woman or IKEA,” the segment concluded with another man being asked, “Have you played pin the tail on the donkey before? Of course you have. This is pin the reproductive system on the woman. Okay, so super easy. You just have to pin the reproductive system on the woman, okay.” The man proceeded to place the reproductive system on the picture upside down, which, assuming there was no made-for-TV-behind the scenes hijinks, says more about that one man than pro-lifers as a whole, but admitting that would undermine Kimmel’s whole point. Here is a transcript for the September 11 show: ABC Jimmy Kimmel Live! 9/11/2024 11:49 PM ET JIMMY KIMMEL: Kamala Harris forcefully defended a woman's right to choose last night, it was very effective, and it got me wondering about how much some of these people who seem to know what's best for women's bodies, how much they actually know about the female anatomy. So, we sent a team deep into the heart of Texas to find out.  INTERVIEWER: Do you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice? MAN 1: Pro-life. WOMAN 1: 1 Pro-life. MAN 2: Pro-life. MAN 3: I'm pro-life. MAN 4: I think a woman should make her choice before she gets in bed. INTERVIEWER: It's come to my attention a lot of Democrats think that pro-life people don't know anything about the female reproductive system, and I just, kind of, want to prove them wrong. How many eggs does a woman have? MAN 1: I have no idea. INTERVIEWER: What does the C in C-section stand for? MAN 1: Not sure. INTERVIEWER: How many eggs does a woman have? MAN 5: I have no clue. INTERVIEWER: Do you know where she stores her eggs? MAN 5: Uterus, I think. INTERVIEWER: Just identify as many organs as you can, okay? Go. MAN 6: The vagina. MAN 7: I'm assuming this is an anus? I don't know. I don't even know -- is a side view? INTERVIEWER: Well, you got the anus right. MAN 8: The anus. The vagina. The clitoris. INTERVIEWER: The what, now? MAN 8: The clitoris. I don’t know, it’s over here someplace. INTERVIEWER: The fallopian tubes? MAN 9: Uh – INTERVIEWER: Oh. MAN 9: Oh no, I already guessed that. INTERVIEWER: Do you have a girlfriend? MAN 9: I don't. INTERVIEWER: You don't? Wow. Okay. So we're going to play a game we're calling "Woman or IKEA?" I'm going to say a name and you're going to tell me if it's a female reproductive organ or a piece of furniture from IKEA, okay. MAN 10: Okay. INTERVIEWER: Mons pubis. MAN 10: That’s going to be IKEA. INTERVIEWER: Part of the female reproductive system. MAN 10: Oh my word. INTERVIEWER: Yeah. Hemnes. MAN 10: I’m going to say that’s a female reproductive system, no— INTERVIEWER: No, that's IKEA. The myometrium. WOMAN: IKEA. INTERVIEWER: Female reproductive system. WOMAN 1: Oh. INTERVIEWER: I know. The kallax. MAN 11: Female. INTERVIEWER: Nope, IKEA shelving unit. MAN 11: Damn it. INTERVIEWER: What about the uvula. MAN 4: Uvula, that’s female. INTERVIEWER: And where is that located on the female? MAN 4: That is, the uvula is below the waist on the female. INTERVIEWER: Actually, you got one in the back of your throat. MAN 4: Oh, that uvula. Uvula, yeah, I'm sorry, I misheard. INTERVIEWER: What did you think I was talking about? The uvula. MAN 1: Oh, yeah, female. INTERVIEWER: And where is that located? MAN 1: Cervix. INTERVIEWER: Mons pubis? WOMAN 2: I don't know what that is. I'm going to guess IKEA. INTERVIEWER: What kind of teacher were you? WOMAN: I taught biology and human anatomy. INTERVIEWER: Have you played pin the tail on the donkey before? Of course you have. This is— MAN 12: Yeah. I can see where this is going already. INTERVIEWER: Pin the reproductive system on the woman. Okay, so super easy. You just have to pin the reproductive system on the woman, okay. MAN 12: All right. INTERVIEWER: Okay? Think about it. And you’re sure you’ve had sex before?

n the lead-up to this week’s presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the polls showed a dead heat, both nationally and in seven swing states. The 2024 race is, by all measures, the closest presidential race we have seen in our lifetimes. But the usual presidential math applies The person upon whom the race becomes a referendum loses. For Trump, then, the task of the debate was threefold: to hammer the point that Kamala Harris is responsible for the failed policies of the Biden-Harris White House and that he is the agent of change -- a proposition with which the majority of Americans tend to agree; to drive home that Harris is actually dangerously far-left, and that she is lying about her current policy positions to protect them from scrutiny; and that she is incompetent, having blown every single task she has ever been handed. In short, Harris is a cipher; it is Trump’s job to clarify who she is. For Harris, the task was more complicated: she had to avoid all of these points, and she had to somehow go further by providing an effective counter. It wasn’t enough to merely dodge punches; she had to establish that she is different than Joe Biden in some marked way, that she is a moderate who has experienced a change of heart, and that she isn’t the cackler who regularly enjoys a heaping helping of word salad. And for the moderators, the task was to help Kamala Harris achieve all of these things. They certainly did their best. David Muir and Linsey Davis turned in the most discreditable job of moderation in presidential history. They repeatedly (and wrongly) fact-checked Trump four times, without ever calling Harris on a single one of her lies. They asked Trump follow-ups and demanded clarification while allowing Harris to skate on her bumper sticker platitudes. They structured their questions to elicit prepared responses from Harris, while demanding that Trump forgo obvious responses to Harris’ lies. It worked. It threw Trump off of his game. Distracted by the three-on-one pile-on, eager to defend himself from every charge and to engage in fisticuffs over his remarks and record, Trump forgot his reason for being there: to target Harris. Instead, he talked about Jan. 6 and the election of 2020 and his record on COVID and his proposals on tariffs and his negotiations with the Taliban. Harris, meanwhile, appeared relatively cool and collected; she dodged nearly every question, with the help of her Praetorian Guard. But there’s a problem: Because both Harris and the media were so intent on dragging Trump down, they forgot that Harris needs to do more than label Trump; she needs to redefine herself. She didn’t do that at all during the debate. Perhaps some Americans came away from the debate more quiescent about her incoherence. But none will come away satisfied that she represents a change in the direction of the country. None will be assuaged that she is a moderate unifier. That’s because she isn’t. Yes, she did better than Trump did, with the help of her loyal apparatchiks. But she didn’t close the deal. Perhaps that’s because she can’t close the deal. The lies are just too big for Americans to swallow. In the end, she is only the nominee because she is Joe Biden’s vice president; she has never won a single primary vote as a candidate. In the end, she is only on the debate stage because of the Biden-Harris administration, in which she claims a critical role. In the end, it is Harris who ran as a Bernie Sanders socialist in 2019, and it is Harris who says that her values haven’t changed. Americans aren’t stupid. And they still have more questions about Harris than about Trump. Trump still has two months to remind Americans to ask those questions.

This Apple Cinnamon Bundt Cake is a wonderful Fall favorite. It’s easy to make and delicious with coffee. If you are a fan of apple recipes you will love this delicious Snickerdoodle Apple Cobbler. It’s made with a snickerdoodle cookie mix and loaded in cinnamon! ❤️WHY WE LOVE THIS RECIPE We love this cake because...

“Our entire country feels like it's in the grips of some kind of demonic force,” says Liz Wheeler. She’s certainly not alone in this feeling. Glenn Beck has underlined for years the demonic oppression that plagues America and has even shared a vision God gave him that confirmed this for him. Tucker Carlson’s tune has also changed lately, as he’s begun to speak into the spirituality that dominates American politics. It seems there’s a growing awareness of what’s outlined in Ephesians 6:12: “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places." Liz, however, shares a video from Catholic priest and exorcist Chad Ripperger, who claims there are five specific demons that are behind the chaos we’re watching unfold in America today. Liz points to multiple examples of what she calls demonic oppression: “the transgender ideology being targeted at our children”; “abortion”; “critical race theory that tells white children that they are inherently racist because of the color of their skin and tells black children that they are inherently oppressed because of the color of their skin"; “Marxism and communism”; “this anti-natalist, anti-child movement”; “the celebration of hedonistic and often perverted sexual hookups”; and “the desecration of marriage.” “You look at this cultural landscape” and you wonder, “are politicians actually that powerful?” “No, politicians are not powerful enough on their own to propagate the evil that we are seeing in our society today,” says Liz. “According to Father Ripperger, there are five demons who are controlling our culture” – all of whom are “generals” that “are immediately hierarchically underneath Satan” and “the ones who execute his plans.” The first is named Baal. “His principal function is to get cultures to succumb to impurity, primarily through fornication.” Asmodeus: “He’s the demon of homosexuality in men.” Leviathan: “The demon of homosexuality in men but of the masculine kind.” The Spirit of Lilith: “The more seductive form of female homosexuality.” Baphomet: “The demon of child sacrifice – abortion.” “They shot down the fornication laws, and so they delivered us into the hands of Baal. Then they had Roe v. Wade and delivered us into the hands of Baphomet, and then they allowed gay marriage, and so now our country politically is in the hold of the top five demons in hell other than Satan,” Ripperger stated. To hear more, watch the clip above. Want more from Liz Wheeler?To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Germany's top soccer association has decided that transgender athletes can now self-identify their gender in order to be in compliance with new German laws.The Deutscher Fussball-Bund, or German Football Association, held a workshop in Frankfurt recently to discuss how the governing body can implement changes in its soccer leagues. The DFB said it was continuing its course on "liberalizing the right to play for transgender and intersex people."Consistently using the word "Spielrecht," which means "right to play," the DFB stated that for the 2025/2026 season transgender athletes will henceforth have the right to "self-determination" and choose whether to play against males or females.New German laws surrounding self-identification come into effect on November 1, 2024, the association said.The DFB claimed that the legislation makes it easier for "trans-sex, inter-sex and non-binary" people to have their gender and first name changed on government documents.The association also put emphasis on the need to create provisions for those who are currently going through a gender transition, as well as those who "do not have a binary gender entry." This is presumably referring to those who believe they are nonbinary or without a specific gender.'Sometimes it starts with the opposing teams or an ignorant referee and often discrimination continues on social media.'The soccer group cited figures from May 2022, stating that 2,228 people in Germany are "neither men nor women" and that another 969 describe themselves as gender "diverse."With Germany's latest population count at about 83,445,000, this means that the DFB is making policy changes to suit approximately 0.00383% of the population. The number of those in that category who also play soccer professionally is likely a fraction of the percentage.The workshop officially featured transgender activists, as well as the "lesbian and gay association." The association cited attendees who "emphasized" how important football is for men who believe they are women, claiming that when playing as women they don't have to "pretend.""Sometimes it starts with the opposing teams or an ignorant referee and often discrimination continues on social media," said Marius Schöpper, a male who alleges to be female.According to Reduxx, activist Julia Monro, formerly known as Ronny Pries, also attended the event. Monro has allegedly claimed that children as young as 3 can identifying as transgender.Monro has also produced a video documentary titled "Transkids – Different but Normal." The documentary concerns four girls who identify as boys, who are taken to a farm to "support them in their transition process."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Sports analysts Michael Wilbon and Charles Barkley took opposite approaches to a recent police interaction involving an NFL player. One blamed racism, while the other said the media was race-baiting.After Miami Dolphins wide receiver Tyreek Hill was detained by Miami-Dade police before a game, bodycam footage was released showing officers pulling the player from his car and handcuffing him on the pavement. The video spawned debate over whether there was excessive force on the part of the police officers or if Hill was simply uncooperative and disrespectful.'You don't have to provoke police, particularly in certain places, to get dragged out of your car.'ESPN's Wilbon firmly took the position that Hill was guilty of "driving while black" and, as such, was subjected to racism."I don't have any questions. I'm old enough, lived long enough, and have driven while black long enough," Wilbon said on ESPN's "Pardon the Interruption.""The police acted with excessive force," Wilbon continued. "If Tyreek Hill rolls down his window, he might have diminished the chances of that happening."Wilbon went on, "I say might because when you're 'driving while black' … you don't have to provoke police, particularly in certain places, to get dragged out of your car. So he might have gotten pulled out of his car anyway."Wilbon concluded by saying multiple scenarios could be true but that parents will still have to speak to their "16-year-old-son" about how to properly cooperate with police when "driving while black."It should be noted that the police officer who was the most aggressive with the NFL wide receiver appeared to have a Hispanic accent.'One thing I hate when we put stuff in the media and we let guys who race-bait start throwing things out there.'NBA great Charles Barkley had a completely different take while appearing on a Fox Sports 910 radio show in Phoenix.When asked for his opinion on the incident, Barkley said that while he wasn't sure what happened, he thought the incident "clearly escalated quickly."Then Barkley pre-emptively shot down a race argument before the hosts on the "Roc and Manuch" show could potentially bring it up."I hate that we're gonna throw it in the media because you know the guys are gonna quickly go to race, and it bothers me." "We got so many fools in the media who love to play the race card. I said, 'Wait a minute, they just did the same thing to Scottie Scheffler.'"Barkley was referring to No.1-ranked golfer and recent PGA Tour champion Scottie Scheffler, who was arrested, booked, and charged with a felony before a tournament in May."The one thing you can't do as a celebrity, you can't say, 'Do you know who I am?' You say, 'Yes, sir,' cooperate 100%."Hill had said in a previous press conference that he never told officers that he was an NFL player or that he was a famous athlete.Barkley continued, "I don't know what happened, but when we let these fools on TV and radio start talking about it, they go straight to, 'Was it racism?' I'm like wait a minute now, we don't know that. I saw the police report say he was uncooperative.""But the one thing I hate when we put stuff in the media and we let guys who race-bait start throwing things out there, like I said, wait a minute, the same thing just happened to Scottie Scheffler, who actually went and got booked! He went down to the big house," Barkley finished.While the NFL player's legal team said lawyers are exploring possible action, the president of the South Florida Police Benevolent Association said that Hill was "not immediately cooperative with the officers on scene."The union official also said Hill "refused to sit on the ground and was therefore redirected to the ground.""Once the situation was sorted out within a few minutes, Mr. Hill was issued two traffic citations and was free to leave," the statement concluded.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

During Tuesday's debate, President Donald Trump said that Kamala Harris "wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison," adding, "This is a radical left liberal that would do this." The liberal media dutifully rushed to defend the vice president, claiming that Trump's assertion was false — which it is not. In doing so, misleading publications like the New Yorker not only drew greater attention to Harris' desire to mutilate illegal aliens' genitals using taxpayer money, but to their own propagandic nature. Time magazine, another publication whose writers evidently underestimated Harris' radicalism, was among the offenders. Confronted with the truth of Trump's claim, it had to issue an embarrassing correction Wednesday. 'The truth was too crazy for the fact checkers.' On Monday, CNN's investigative outfit KFile unearthed an American Civil Liberties Union questionnaire completed in 2019 by then-Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), which revealed several of Harris' extreme positions and goals. Harris indicated that she supported the decriminalization of all drug possession for personal use; statehood for Washington, D.C.; the repeal of the Hyde Amendment; ending illegal alien detention facilities; and cutting Immigration and Customs Enforcement funding. Harris also vowed to ensure that "federal prisoners and detainees are able to obtain medically necessary care for gender transition, including surgical care, while incarcerated or detained." Time magazine, which has previously concern-mongered about "disinformation" and "fake news," originally reported: The former President repeated a baseless Internet rumor that migrant invaders were killing and eating pet dogs and cats in Springfield, Ohio, and falsely claimed that Harris 'wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.' The publication has since updated the article to read: Trump glowered and grimaced, spewing old grievances and strange new attacks. The former President repeated a baseless Internet rumor that migrant invaders were killing and eating pet dogs and cats in Springfield, Ohio, and claimed that Harris 'wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.' The latest version contains a corrective note at the very bottom admitting that Time's original story "mischaracterized as false Donald Trump's statement accusing Kamala Harris of supporting 'transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.'" "As a presidential candidate in 2019, Harris filled out a questionnaire saying she supported taxpayer-funded gender transition treatment for detained immigrants," added Time's correction. Donald Trump Jr. noted on X, "Unreal." Former presidential candidate and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy said, "Turns out the truth was too crazy for the fact checkers." Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk tweeted, "Kamala, TIME, and ABC collectively got owned on one simple, easily confirmed fact-check. This is fantastic." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The release of Fallout London. Confirmation of Civilization 7. Growing older, tireder, and getting more gray hair. There are many things that I was certain would happen in 2024, but this was not one of them. Wind the clocks back a decade - jump back in time, like the specter of Ebenezer Scrooge - and what do you see? You see yourself, on your phone, trying to get a tiny pixelated bird to fly through the gaps in some pipes. It was here and then, just as quickly as it arrived, it was gone, destroyed by its creator at the height of its irresistible power. But now, ten years later, the infamous Flappy Bird is officially coming back - and this time it’s on PC. Continue reading Ten years later, one of the most infamous games ever is somehow back MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best platform games, Best new PC games, Best old games

What are the Throne and Liberty Twitch drops? MMOs are often all about gear, and if you're readying yourself to drop into the latest Amazon multiplayer game, Throne and Liberty, there's one simple way to boost your inventory. Among the common features of many MMORPGs are mounts, friendly companions you can ride across wide expanses to make things that bit quicker, and pets, more harmless companions that just, well, look cute. In Throne and Liberty, pets come in the form of adorable Amitois, while you yourself become the mount with Morphing, a remarkable shape-shifting ability. With these Throne and Liberty Twitch drops, you can unlock one of each, and more. Continue reading Throne and Liberty Twitch drops and how to claim MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best MMORPGs, Best single-player MMO games, Best free games

There’s a certain feeling that only the best space games manage to evoke. It comes in titles like Elite Dangerous, No Man’s Sky, Eve Online - and yes, even Starfield, on occasion. It’s that feeling of vulnerability, of being tiny in a vast cosmos, and you find it sitting in your spaceship like a precious diamond hanging in the frozen emptiness of space. CCP Games' next title, Eve Frontier, looks like it’ll capture that feeling in spades, and it’s got plenty of other things to get excited about, too. Continue reading Eve Frontier is a new survival game set in the MMO’s iconic universe MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best survival games, Best space games, Best multiplayer games