Heads up parents! Do you know what your kids are being shown in school? In “Health Class”? I’ll show you. Take a look right here and you tell me if you think this is age-appropriate for 5th graders: Ohio Parent is Horrified by the videos being played for 5th graders… I’ve been talking about the disgusting videos Amaze Videos makes for the public school system for a few years now. These sexualized Lesson Plans make its way into the public school system through a group… https://t.co/xU4ZLTNqB5 pic.twitter.com/6hZz1SUT4U — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 11, 2024 Ohio Parent is Horrified by the videos being played for 5th graders… I’ve been talking about the disgusting videos Amaze Videos makes for the public school system for a few years now. These sexualized Lesson Plans make its way into the public school system through a group called “Advocates for Youth”… I’m so glad this is getting attention now… keep sharing. Homeschool if you can.. but inform every parent you come in contact with. This is not ok. Backup here on Rumble if needed: Is this ok with you? How about the gender identity videos for older grades? I suppose it’s better than this: BANNED VIDEO Shows How Schools Are Instructing Children Age 4-9 To Masturbate What is going on? This is the second story today I’ve covered about schools hyper-sexualizing students. In some cases VERY young students. According to StopWorldControl.com the video below was banned from Rumble: Although it was banned from Rumble, I have a copy. WARNING: this is disgusting stuff what these people are doing. Watch here at your own risk: BANNED VIDEO shows how schools are instructing children to masturbate… WARNING: this is UN Agenda 2030…and it’s sick!#BannedVideo #UN #Sick #Children #SaveTheKids pic.twitter.com/X7sGRDLwcZ — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 1, 2023 Here’s more from StopWorldControl: “Schools must equip children to have sexual partners” – say the UN and WHO This evidence report reveals how the World Health Organization and United Nations are sexualizing little children in primary education worldwide, for the purpose of normalizing pedophilia. This report consists of nothing but solid evidence, with many official documents, videos, books, archives, etc. All PDF documents may be downloaded from the references section at the end of this report. “Little children are sexual beings who must have sexual partners and begin with sex as soon as possible. For this reason, kindergartens and elementary schools must teach children to develop lust and sexual desire, learn masturbation, build same-sex relationships, use online pornography, and learn different sexual techniques such as oral sex.” The above is a paraphrased summary of the official guidelines issued by the World Health Organization and the United Nations to educational authorities worldwide. Meanwhile, judicial organizations are issuing statements that sex between little children and adults should be legalized, while media outlets and political parties are calling for the acceptance of pedophilia as a “normal sexual orientation”. Equipping children to have sexual partners The United Nations has issued the document “International Technical Guidance on Sexual Education”.1 It is the official guideline for elementary schools around the world. The goal of this document is described on page 16.  In their own words:  “It aims to equip children… to develop sexual relationships”. On page 17, the United Nations explains that this guide is intended to help children build relationships with romantic or sexual partners. In their own words: “These skills can help children form relationships with… sexual partners.” On page 71, educators are instructed to teach little kids from the age of 5 about kissing, hugging, touching and sexual behaviors.  9-year-old children are to be taught about masturbation, sexual attraction and sexual stimulation. Teaching little kids to have sex The agenda to ensure that little children have sexual parters is being further developed by the World Health Organization. Their document, “Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe”,2 contains the following instructions for kindergartens and elementary schools: ︎ Children between 0 and 4 years must learn about masturbation and develop an interest in their own and others’ bodies. ︎ Children between 4 and 6 years must learn about masturbation and be encouraged to express their sexual needs and wishes. ︎ Children between 6 and 9 years must learn about sexual intercourse, online pornography, having a secret love and self-stimulation. ︎ Children between 9 and 12 years should have their first sexual experience and learn to use online pornography.   The WHO instructs teachers worldwide to educate 9-year-old children about having sexual intercourse for the first time, how to experience sex using the internet and mobile phones, and learning different sexual techniques. School video instructs kids to begin masturbating The following video is part of a European school program that works closely with the World Health Organization and United Nations to implement their agenda in schools nationwide. It is a real-world example of the execution of these guidelines, in this case, in The Netherlands. The video shows how children are encouraged by teachers to begin masturbating. This video was distributed to many thousands of schools as part of the WHO “comprehensive sexuality education” program, whose objective is that children should start having sex as early as possible. The publisher of this video, the Rutgers Foundation, operates in 27 nations, is a close partner of the WHO and UN, and is funded by Bill Gates and Planned Parenthood.6 The language spoken in the video is Dutch, but please be aware that this is a real-life example of the execution of an INTERNATIONAL agenda of the World Health Organization and the United Nations, therefore this will be coming to public schools in every nation of the world.  There’s a lot more and if you want to read it all you can see the FULL article here: https://stopworldcontrol.com/children/?inf_contact_key=24325a1fdff113b6c32f395ed410c93fd18a532c4142cb79caf2b269de1401fa#watch-video Related: GRAPHIC: California Teacher Caught On Camera Teaching Students How To Enjoy Anal Sex Warning: this is a graphic post. You may have surmised that much from the headline, but I’m giving you a second warning. Ok, we good? Continue at your own risk. But that’s kind of the point right? If I have to put a warning on this article for you adults to read it, then why are we ok with it in our schools? And yes I realize this is high school and no I’m not against Sex Education. But since when did Sex Education involve being taught how to enjoy anal sex and stimulate the prostate? That’s Sex Ed now? I’ll say this too…this teacher may just be doing her job. She may just be teaching the curriculum she was given. I don’t know. So you tell me: you ok with this being taught in school?     View this post on Instagram   A post shared by dont get caught (@edhscaughtlacking) Backup here on Rumble: Oh and did you notice how quickly they start talking about how you can buy Sex Toys at Target? Because….of course you can. The PostMillenial had more details: An educator at El Dorado High School in Placentia, California was captured on video giving students explicit instructions during class on how to have pleasure during anal sex, and where to find sex toys that will stimulate the prostate gland. The video, posted to the Instagram account @edhscaughtlacking, shows the educator, sitting atop a desk in front of a classroom full of students, discussing why anal sex is pleasurable for gay men, with an enlarged image of a prostate gland behind her. “You don’t have to go inside the booty hole you can actually just push on the seam and that stimulates the prostate gland,” the educator told her students. “They apparently really like that.” “So that’s why, for male and male, anal sex is still very pleasurable because of the fact that it hits the prostate and there’s a lot of nerve endings in your booty, as well,” the educator explained, according to the video. She then told the class that the prostate gland is equivalent to the “g-spot” for women, and shared places where students can purchase sex toys that stimulate these areas. “If you go to Target, seriously, if you go to Target and go where the tampons and pads are, they have they just look like a little box but if you open it up, there’s like a Velcro front to the box, you open it up and then ‘BAM’ sex toys,” she explained. One student interrupted and said that sex toys can also be purchased as CVS pharmacies and the educator responded, “Yes! CVS has them too. A lot of them.” “So that’s why when you look at the toys, a lot of them look like this,” she said, making a gesture that included a hooked finger insinuating that position stimulates both the “g-spot” and prostate gland, video shows. The California Board of Education approved new statewide comprehensive sex education laws in 2019 to include LGBTQ inclusivity for health education under the California Healthy Youth Act, which has been heavily criticized by parents. Following the updated sex education laws, hundreds of parents and residents of California communites expressed their opposition of the LGBTQ framework to the Instructional Quality Commission, which is an advisory to the state board, according to EdSource. From Twitter: Allegedly, a Southern-California high school teacher gave students explicit instructions on pleasure during anal sex. Sadly, this isn’t surprising…this is expected and typical with Comprehensive Sexuality Education. Full video and video credit from: https://t.co/DHPtQ5bgeD pic.twitter.com/L0vLBnqX2o — Kelly S. (@kellyske) May 30, 2023 It’s basically “kink ed” at this point: It’s kink ed at this point. When did reproductive education change into Sex Ed? — Renaissance Cowboy (@RennCowboy69) May 31, 2023 Exactly right: They’ve got time for THIS but not enough time or money for STEM and the arts! What travesty! — Tonye Tariah-Health (@ttariahhealth) May 31, 2023 Why is this necessary? I have no problem with sex education in HS environment. Use condoms to prevent disease. Birth control, how to find resources and talk about with adults. But, simply put, teaching them how to find the clit and prostate and how to “get people off?” and find sex toys? — My2Centrist – I #BCH (@toomuch72) May 31, 2023 What do YOU think? RELATED REPORT: VIEWER WARNING: Eighth Graders Shown Condom Video I’ve got a wild one for you… And you also might be surprised to get my take on it. But first let me lay it out. The Idaho Freedom Foundation (IFF) first covered this story and let the world know about an animated sex video being shown in the classroom to 8th Graders. The video was made by Trojan Condoms and was used as part of a Planned Parenthood sex education program. But you really need to see it, so here you go… The video is cheekily titled “Condom Sense”: Here’s the alert put out by the Idaho Freedom Foundation: Eighth-grade kids in Moscow Middle School were shown a disturbing video with animated sex scenes and a cartoon character apparently removing a condom from his erect penis. The video was part of a Planned Parenthood-endorsed sex education program which is implemented in public schools by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and by individual health districts. Public records requests reveal that the video was shown for multiple years as part of the sex education program known as Reducing the Risk. Use of the video and other materials obtained by IFF indicates violation of Idaho law and standards, which require all sex education taught in public schools to reinforce traditional family arrangements and teach abstinence. The video definitely does not promote abstinence. “Keep the condom on until you ejaculate,” says a female narrator. The video switches to a bird exiting a cuckoo clock on the bedroom wall. Trojan’s video then shows a hand pushing a used condom up off a shaft. “Immediately after ejaculation, hold the condom in place and withdraw the penis while it is still erect,” the narrator says. “Dispose of the used condom by wrapping it in tissue,” the narrator adds alongside a depiction of just that. Titled “Condom Sense,” the video was created by Trojan Condoms and shows multiple scenes in which either a bed or car is rocking back and forth in an obvious attempt to depict sexual activity. Another scene shows the man and woman, whose breast size seems purposefully enhanced, at a table where the waiter offers a platter of various types of condoms. “Some have unique shapes, ribbing, nubs – all designed to enhance the experience,” the narrator says. NCHD has said that video was shown virtually and in-person at Moscow Middle School from 2019-2020. It was similarly shown in-person at Tammany Alternative School from 2018-2020. Another Trojan video was shown at Moscow Middle School from 2019-2022 and Tammany from 2018-2020. This one outlines, along with footage, how the company manufactures its condoms. A separate video discusses the history of condoms and includes clips of topless women. That content was revealed as part of a 2018 email in which NCHD Health Education Specialist Jennifer Andrews laid out multiple videos she intended to show students during a presentation for Reducing the Risk (RTR). NCHD says that particular video — dubbed “The History of Condoms” — was utilized at Tammany Alternative School but hasn’t been shown since 2018. Meanwhile, when asked for RTR content that was utilized, Moscow school district returned a presentation which included screenshots from both Trojan condoms videos. Idaho Freedom Foundation’s Center for American Education has reported extensively on this program, and Trojan’s video is the latest content linked to RTR, which can be approved by individual school districts. The curriculum can vary by jurisdiction. The Trojan video featured prominently at the beginning of a NCHD-recorded zoom lesson for RTR, which was recorded when some schools were teaching virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic. After showing the Trojan video during the recorded lesson an NCHD representative says, “Ok, great little video there.” The lesson also included a Trojan video touting the company’s manufacturing process. During the recording, the presenter later noted the ability for teens to obtain birth control pills from a doctor or family planning clinic without parental involvement. “You do not need a parent’s permission to get birth control at a clinic. No one needs to know that you’re going to the clinic anyways,” she said. “That’s between you and the doctor.” At another point, she says that a person-to-person visit with a health care provider is the best way to obtain information about contraception. “Your parents are a trusted source, but the most trusted one is a health care provider,” she adds. Part of the “contraception” presentations also included information about the abortifacient Plan B. The recorded lessons, 15 of which were obtained via records request, offered a glimpse into how NCHD intended to present the RTR curriculum to students. NCHD has said that only one of the recordings was utilized by Moscow Middle School, although it’s unclear which one. Regardless, NCHD and Moscow School District provided electronic copies of slides similar or identical to ones used in the Zoom recordings, and that contained problematic content. The RTR presentations discovered in NCHD primarily focused on promoting what we have previously called the “New Abstinence.” The objective definition of abstinence is abstaining from sex until marriage. The New Abstinence redefines the term to mean avoiding sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and pregnancy. Marriage is not in their vocabulary. Marital sex or marriage is never mentioned in the presentations. Meanwhile, vaginal, anal, or oral sex are discussed at least a dozen times in connection with using protection and avoiding STDs or pregnancy. The lessons promote vaginal and oral sex using a condom and sexual fantasy as positive, “no risk” behaviors for kids. Anal sex with a condom, oral sex without a condom, and having sex while high or drunk are considered to only carry “some risk.” Currently, RTR is being used by more than a dozen schools affecting around 700 students each year. Potlatch School District, which neighbors Moscow and is also part of NCHD, saw a contentious school board meeting in November as residents reeled from news that RTR was part of their small town’s curriculum. Ultimately, they voted to end the use of RTR, but the controversy raised questions about why the Department of Health and Welfare has pushed the Planned Parenthood-backed curriculum into K-12 classrooms. One board member stated that he “was afraid a teacher might teach the full curriculum to students.” School districts are not required to notify parents that they can opt their children out of sex education under Idaho code. If districts do choose to alert parents about the Reducing the Risk program, they claim children will be taught “abstinence.” Thus parents are left in the dark unless they realize Planned Parenthood has changed the meaning of the term to show kids how to have sex, transition genders, or get an abortion. The Trojan video is just one example of the graphic content being shown to our children by public schools and government health districts. Parents MUST find out what else is going on and hold their school districts accountable, because it only gets worse from here. More here: Ok….so now for my take. You may disagree with me, and that’s ok! I give my take and I’d love to hear yours in the comments section. But I have to say this is lower on the list of things that offend me than some other stories we’ve covered recently (which I will copy below). These are not 2nd Graders, they’re 8th Graders. If you think an 8th Grader has never heard of sex or condoms or seen far worse on the internet, you’re fooling yourself. Not that any of that is ok, but it is reality for 99.9% of people. At some point, they grow up and they do need to be taught certain things. Abstinence only teaching would definitely be preferred, but I don’t find this to be wildly out of line. I remember being in similar “sex ed” classes growing up. I’m pretty sure ours were in 6th grade, so to show this in 8th grade doesn’t tend to offend me all that much. But I’m really interested to hear what you think… Now, I will tell you this… This next one is something to really get worked up about: Here Is That SICK Sex Ed Video Teaching First Graders To Masturbate Early warning on this article….this take is graphic. If you don’t want to hear graphic content, turn away now. Ok, you’ve been warned. But that’s actually kind of the point of this article. If this topic is too graphic for some of you to even want to read, then why are we allowing it to be taught to our CHILDREN? Not even just children, but how about FIRST Graders? Yes, really. Here is a short 3 minute clip where Ben Shapiro gives his thoughts and shows you the vile cartoon they are showing to your First Graders in school. This ok with you? Watch here: This too: 2nd Graders Shown Video of Man With Erect Wang Standing Over Child It’s hard to imagine something less appropriate than showing a classroom full of Second Graders a cartoon with a man with a fully-erect Johnson standing over a child…. Yet that’s what happened in Connecticut this week: In my hometown, in my daughters age group class of second grade, they showed an animated video today of a man with an ERECTION standing over a child!!!!! this is not OK!!!!https://t.co/B4vgSa7Qle — Carl Higbie (@CarlHigbie) March 29, 2021 Of course, the school district has tried to claim it was an “educational video” protecting against things like abuse. What do you think? Is that a good enough reason to show a giant erect Schlong to a classroom of 2nd Graders? Could the same goal have been accomplished in a different way? You be the judge and watch for yourself…. Is this video ok in your mind for 2nd Graders? Here’s what my friends over at The Blaze reported: Second graders in Greenwich, Connecticut, were shown an animated video that displays the silhouette of a man with a graphic, full erection standing over what has been described as a “sad” girl during a “lesson on social and emotional learning.” The New York Post reported that the kids were shown a cartoon titled, “Alfred Jr. & Shadow: A Short Story About Being Scared,” during a virtual class that the Greenwich Free Press said was “a lesson on social and emotional learning.” The Free Press reported: The description of the video says, “All children are normalscared, but what do children who are embarrassedscared or painfulscared need?” It explains that The Alfred Jr. & Shadow – A Short Story about Being Scared was an educational film for children aged 6-14 years. The children learn about different ways of being scared, what they need when they are scared, and suggestions for actions. Adults also get some tips on how to meet a child who is scared. At one point in the video, the narrator says, “Some children are afraid that their mom and dad will beat them, or that their parents will fight. Other children have experienced an adult touching or putting their penis in the child’s private parts or mouth.” As the voiceover speaks, the image displayed for several seconds on the screen is what The Washington Examiner called “a dejected-looking child” next to “a sexually aroused silhouetted man.” The Post provided a montage to describe the video, which is provided below. What did one parent say? Greenwich parent and Newsmax host Carl Higbie tweeted, “In my hometown, in my daughters age group class of second grade, they showed an animated video today of a man with an ERECTION standing over a child!!!!! this is not OK!!!!” Higbie told the Free Press that he was “relieved” that his own second grader did not see the film, but that several other “disgusted” parents had reached out to him to express their outrage. “That somebody thought this video was acceptable for second graders was abhorrent,” he told the outlet. And one more: New “Kids” TV Show Launches About Man With Abnormally Lengthy Dong This is a reprint of one of my favorite stories of last year.  ICYMI. Yes, you read that right. Call it whatever you want….a Dong, a Schlong, a Unit, a Johnson….call it whatever you want, it’s the star of a new kids TV show in Denmark. Yes, I said kids show. Aimed at kids. Someone really thought this was a good idea. Take a look: Evolution of kids tv: -Kids before had Transformers and He-Man. -My generation had Yu Gi Oh and Pokemon. -New generation has Pup Patrol and John Dillermand (Penisman in Danish) Denmark launches children’s TV show about man with giant penis https://t.co/qcfmTWGbAQ — Aldo (@aldo_alvarez93) January 7, 2021 Even after yesterday’s violence you just have to ask: Denmark: WTF?? John Dillermand: New Danish children’s TV show features a man with a massive penis – CNN https://t.co/Vla27MjAbR — Bob Mana (@GeneralMana) January 8, 2021 And it’s for kids: https://twitter.com/NarutoMobutu/status/1346870668936286215 You would think this has to be fake, but sadly it’s not. From CNN: Denmark’s flagship broadcaster has suffered blowback over its newest children’s TV program, “John Dillermand” — an animation starring a man with a penis so massive and flexible it can save children from danger, fetch objects from a river and operate as a pogo stick. The show, whose 13 episodes are available to watch on the DR network’s website, follows its titular character as he navigates an array of unexpected scenarios caused by his inexplicably huge genitalia. In episode one, for instance, the mustached Dillermand uses his gigantic, stripey organ as a lead for his dog — but quickly finds himself inundated with requests from his neighbors to take their pets out for a walk, too. At another point in the show, he is stuck floating in mid-air after balloons are tied to his groin. In another episode, he breaks a friend’s vase with his penis and must raise money to pay them back, and in a third, he uses it to steal an ice cream at the zoo. The show’s opening montage also shows him using his genitals to keep a lion away from a group of children. The show was generally met with hilarity in Denmark and across the internet, with many praising it as an appropriate and light-hearted way to teach children about the human anatomy. But some took issue with the main character’s central trait. Danish politician Morten Messerschmidt, a member of the right-wing Danish People’s Party, said children should not be forced to watch a cartoon depiction of an adult man’s groin. close dialog And a handful of parents have taken to the Facebook page of DR’s children’s network, urging them to remove the program. A spokesperson for DR told CNN that most of those who criticized the program did so “without even (having) seen the show, because it wasn’t released yet.” “Now the great majority here in Denmark are … making fun of the few critics instead,” Sarah Cecilie added. “Hundreds of thousands is supporting ‘John Dillermand’ now.” “In Denmark it is now a huge success, and the children are watching it in big numbers,” she said, telling CNN that 200,000 people have viewed the first episode. You can watch a real preview of the show here if you dare: Stay classy Denmark.

Have you seen this video before? Chances are you haven’t. It only aired once, on live TV on 9/11/2001….and then never again. Copies started circulating on the Internet but were quickly wiped out. Finally, with Free Speech safe again on Twitter, we can now post it again. The video in question is an on-the-scenes reporter for CNN standing outside the Pentagram errrrrr “Pentagon” Building and saying they cannot see any evidence of a plane ever hitting the building. No tail section, no wings in the debris, nothing. Just small little pieces. Almost as if…..it was a missile and not a plane? Take a look for yourself: This footage aired only once after 9/11. Who here can remember this? pic.twitter.com/F2KHaVIWSu — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) September 11, 2024 Full screen video player here: This footage aired only once after 9/11. Who here can remember this? pic.twitter.com/F2KHaVIWSu — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) September 11, 2024 Stew Peters offers a different angle of the impact…. What do YOU see? Weird how this “plane” hitting the pentagon doesn’t have any wings… pic.twitter.com/HjdT4ZpYXn — Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) September 11, 2024 This is the official story they want you to believe: Another angle here: So, are we talking 9/11 today? Are Americans ready to admit they were lied to? It was right in front of our eyes the entire time, showing the power of propaganda and the commitment to the lies. Do you see a plane hit the Pentagon?pic.twitter.com/q0A7LaZrtf — Owen Shroyer (@OwenShroyer1776) September 11, 2024 So that’s the Pentagon. Now let’s talk Building 7, because that’s even worse! #NeverForget…Building 7 It’s 9/11 today, perhaps you’ve heard? While “Never Forget” is being plastered all over online, I’d like to do my version of that and remind you to “Never Forget Building 7”. Many of you may know instantly what I mean by that. For everyone else, please allow me to explain… Building 7 was in the “World Trade Center Complex” but it wasn’t that close to the Twin Towers. Here’s a map: That’s Building 7 in blue. The Twin Towers are WTC 1 and WTC 2. It is undisputed even by believers of the official 9/11 story that WTC was never hit by an airplane. It doesn’t even BORDER the Twin Towers. It’s quite a distance away. And yet….it came down. I’m far from the first person to notice or question this. Oh, and it was announced live on TV 20 minutes before it happened…. Oops! Take a look: Remember BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 approximately 20 minutes before its actual collapse on 9/11. They even had their reporter deliver this news as Building 7 stood tall in the background. How did the BBC know that a 47 story steel-framed skyscraper would collapse? pic.twitter.com/f0TRtxoTnT — CanadianPatriot1974 (@CPatriot1974) September 6, 2022 2/2Jennings who was inside WTC building 7.He reported multiple explosions before the building fell.He reported that the lobby was completely blown out and that he had to step over dead bodies on the way out of the buildingHe mysteriously died after few years of speaking out pic.twitter.com/6Ie0Eivf1L — Truthseeker (@Xx17965797N) September 11, 2022 This says it all about what happened on that day.How did the BBC report the collapse of building WTC-7 20 minutes before it actually happened?????Who gave them the script? pic.twitter.com/ql41VqL3NL — Yes, it’s me (@ElysiusThor) September 11, 2022 Never hit by a plane, yet collapsed like a controlled demolition: Never forget Building 7 of the World Trade Center was never hit by a plane yet it collapsed like a controlled demolition on 9/11. #911NeverForget pic.twitter.com/7HY3qhXw8S — Conspiracies & Comics (@ConspiraciesCo) September 11, 2022 Luckily we have those great “fact checkers” over at FullFact to set us straight on why this is totally normal and really not odd at all, so please stop questioning it, ok? A post on Instagram has claimed that on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 collapsed “for no apparent reason”. During the terror attacks of 11 September 2001, four planes were hijacked: two were flown into the Twin Towers, one into the Pentagon and another crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. Two planes were flown into the North and South towers, part of the World Trade Center complex of seven buildings. Both towers collapsed shortly afterwards. World Trade Center 7 was a 47-storey building in the complex, which was not directly hit by an aircraft, and also collapsed later that day. There are a number of reasons this building collapsed on the day, despite not being hit by planes, which have been described by investigators, scientists and experts since. According to the US government’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which investigated the reasons behind the collapse for years, a number of fires are behind World Trade Center 7’s collapse. NIST says that debris from the collapse of the North Tower ignited fires on at least 10 floors of World Trade Center 7, some of which burned out of control because the automatic sprinkler system for some floors had failed (partly due to city water lines damaged by the collapse of the Twin Towers). Heat from the fires then caused steel support beams to expand which led to several floors collapsing. This then triggered a number of other structural failures, which eventually resulted in the whole building collapsing. The theory that an explosion caused the building’s collapse was investigated, but no evidence of this was found. It’s true that fire causing tall buildings to collapse is rare. NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder told journalists at the time: “This is the first time that we are aware of, that a building taller than about 15 stories has collapsed primarily due to fires”. Here’s even more… The TRUTH About 9/11 (EXPOSED — In Their Own Words) The truth will set you free… That’s right folks, we’re going there. Yes, we’re digging into the truth about 9/11 and the truth may shock you. Sorry to anyone who is offended, but we always follow the truth wherever it leads us and it’s time to open up some eyes. This may be one of the most important posts we’ve ever published so be sure to bookmark it and share with others. Ok, let’s dig in, starting with this video… This is video of the building falling floor by floor in what appears to be a controlled demolition. But that’s not just my opinion. Listen as the First Responders talk about it in their own words after watching it happen — watch here on Rumble: Backup here: There words not mine pic.twitter.com/WRVALA4IYC — Shannon Crawford (@shae33172) July 1, 2022 Now let’s go a little deeper… In what may be one of the most brilliant 5-minute videos ever created, watch as the entire “story” of 9/11 is explained to you. Do you buy this? Would ANYONE buy this if it wasn’t force-fed to them by the Crooked MSM fake news media? Watch here on Rumble and be amazed: But we’re only just getting warmed up…. Did you know it’s been confirmed that THERMITE was used? This only leads to one conclusion: controlled demolition. Thermite is a mixture of aluminum powder and a metal oxide (such as iron oxide) that when ignited evolves a great deal of heat and is used in welding and in incendiary bombs. It melts things like steel at temperatures much higher than any other fire or bomb could do. In short, you remember the way the Twin Towers came down at free fall speed? Many believe that is ONLY possible if it were lined with Thermite. And here’s more proof….from the The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31, here is a deep dive of highly researched scientific findings. Their conclusion? The building was LOADED with thermite: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe And for the visual learners out there, I have this…. This video that tells you a whole lot more….watch it safely here on Rumble: And that’s not all. Never forget that Donald Trump himself was the first person to say he did not believe even a plane could take down those towers. He knows construction and he knew how those buildings were constructed. In short?  He says completely impossible. Read this from Health Nut News: Donald Trump is a professional builder. He’s spent much of his career in construction, building casinos and restaurants, and his opinion on the way the World Trade Centers came down is that of educated observation. According to Rick Shaddock, Executive Director of the Association for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness, “Donald Trump was the first 9/11 Truther to speak out on TV, on the very same day, challenging the official story, and saying bombs must have been used, years before Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth was founded, from the perspective of people who know buildings are built to stand strong, even against planes.” Indeed, Donald did call out the situation, claiming the immense strength of the steel beams and that the damage done must have been caused by explosives of some sort. He also seemed to think that something other than the plane must have penetrated the building initially (which may or may not have been the case). Of course, since his public exclamation, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have laid out a convincing argument that explosives likely lined the inside of the building, enabling a controlled demolition. This, in their opinion, is the only way anyone could have gotten the buildings to fall straight down, in free-fall, like they did. Here is the transcript from the video: Alan Marcus: Donald you’re probably the best-known builder particularly of great buildings in the city. There’s a great deal of question about whether or not the damage and and the ultimate destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes by architectural defect or possibly by bombs or more after shocks you have any thoughts on that? Donald Trump: It wasn’t architectural defect. The World Trade Center was always known as a very very strong building. Don’t forget that took a big bomb in the basement (1993). Now, the basement is the most vulnerable place because that’s your foundation and it withstood that and I got to see that area about three or four days after took place because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour because he did the building and I said “I can’t believe it”. The the building was standing solid and half of the columns were blown out. This was an unbelievably powerful building. If you don’t know anything about structure it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. The steel, the reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows, you had the steel on the outside, the steel on the outside of the building. That’s why when I first looked – and you had these big heavy i-beams. When I first looked at it, I couldn’t believe it, because there was a hole in the steel and this is steel that was, you remember the width of the windows of the World Trade Center folks. I think you know if you were ever up there, they were quite narrow and in between was this heavy steel. I said how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or 747 or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this steel? I happen to think that they had not only a plane but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously, because I just can’t imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steel on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside which is the strongest structure you can have and it was almost just like a can of soup Rolland Smith: You know, Donald we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into building number two and when you see that approach the far side and and all of a sudden within a matter of milliseconds the explosion pops out the other side. Donald Trump: Right. I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think obviously they were very big planes. They were going very rapidly, because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast it seems to be coming down into the building. So is getting the speed from going down hill so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane because you’re talking about talking about steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on the building. These buildings were rock-solid and you know it’s just an amazing amazing thing. This country is different today and it’s going to be different than it ever was for many years to come. Now watch the video. Here is Donald Trump back in 2001 explaining what he saw and what he believes. Watch here on Rumble: If you want more, please go to these resources: Understanding The Use Of Thermite On 9-11 Theories that Aluminothermic Materials Were Used to Destroy the Twin Towers 9/11 – Who Put Thermite In The World Trade Center? Ok, and here is one more before we wrap this up. George W. Bush admitting explosives were used? A slip of the tongue perhaps, but the Bible also says “Out of the heart, the mouth speaks.” I am ashamed to admit I voted for George W. Bush.  Twice. Granted, the alternative was no better. Actually, I should probably rephrase that….I’m ashamed I wasn’t red-pilled enough back then to understand what was going on. Not many of us were. We all thought the Bushes were great patriots….great Republicans. In fact, we thought the battle was Republican vs. Democrat. We know better now. Now we see it for what it really is….globalists vs. nationalists. Those who hate America and want to destroy it vs. those who LOVE America. We see clearly now. But there was a time we supported Bush and trusted what he said. Oh even then we knew he wasn’t the smartest tool in the shed. And that may be his ultimate downfall, because I have been searching for this video for a long time and finally found it again. This is the video where GWB admits there were explosives used in 9/11. No, it’s not as if he “comes clean” and admits the whole thing….more like he’s just not smart enough to even realize when he’s just accidentally “told the truth”. Watch it here on Rumble: Did you support Bush at one time? Did you vote for him? Do you regret it now? Leave a comment below. By the way, it’s not the first time allegations of explosions have been made. There is a mountain of evidence (plus common sense and trusting what our eyes saw) to realize that it was a controlled demolition. Even Trump himself said so the week of the wreckage. Read this from Daily Commercial News: Despite strong contrary arguments, a McMaster University engineering professor steadfastly maintains the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings after the infamous 9/11 attacks can only be adequately explained if “controlled demolition” is part of the equation. Robert Korol, a civil engineering professor emeritus and a fellow of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, authored a report with Steven Jones, former professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). The report was titled 15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses published last year in the Europhysics News journal which is a magazine for the European physics community and owned by the European Physical Society. In the controversial paper, the authors reflect the overarching premise of the AE911Truth, which has collected 2,936 signatures from engineers and architects. Among those petition signatories are 19 who earned their respective degrees in Canada, including 15 who live here. AE911 Truth posits: “there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.” The group has long been controversial and its arguments have ignited many debates. The overwhelming consensus has favoured the official explanation which states that fires burning inside the buildings weakened the structural steel and triggered their collapse. This has consistently been reaffirmed by U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) over the last 16 years. The Europhysics News editors also recognize the controversy, publishing the article with the following note: “This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.” Reached at his home in Dundas, Ont., Korol shrugs off the controversy. “I’ve been scratching my head over this one since it happened on Sept. 11, 2001,” he says. “I just couldn’t understand how those buildings collapsed. It didn’t make sense.” While the most iconic images of that fateful day are the collapse of the twin towers World Trade Center 1 (WTC 1) and World Trade Center 2 (WTC 2) within moments of each other, following the fires started by a passenger airplane crashing into each of them, there is a third building most often cited as the smoking gun in the “controlled demolition” theory. This building, World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) was not hit by any aircraft and yet it too imploded like a house of cards, says Korol and his co-authors and others note it housed CIA and Secret Service offices. “Indeed, neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise — nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-storey office building,” they argue. “Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally.” Korol, who has taken contrarian positions on other engineering-related issues, says it’s important to keep challenging the status quo because we need to know how and why the buildings collapsed in order to prevent reoccurrences. “The fires were on the upper floors, there’s little chance the heat would have spread down and caused the steel columns, or the connectors or floor beams, to sufficiently weaken and collapse in the twin towers,” he tells the Daily Commercial News. “Also they were treated with a fire retardant which would have insulated them.” Further, he says, when the structures did fail they did so with such explosive force that pulverized concrete was ejected at high velocity and scattered on a debris field some 370 metres away. The most probable explanation is a controlled explosion and mostly likely using thermite, he says, adding in the case of WTC 7 some 67 per cent of the supporting steel strength in Column 79 — pinpointed as the cause of the fatal collapse — would have to be lost before it failed and that would mean temperatures of 660C. The paper also notes sprinkler systems would have reduced heat factors, while the overall design of the steel structure would isolate any failure and prevent a domino-effect collapse. The NIST however maintains the heat factor triggered an expansion in floor beams, pushing them off their seats and causing the collapse when other components also failed due to thermal expansion. Korol and other likeminded colleagues, stubbornly disagree. Watch more here:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discussed what type of role he would ideally like to have in a Trump administration. In an appearance on “Full Send Podcast,” RFK Jr. said he would possibly do something in “public health.” “Right now they’ve asked me to be on the transition team, which I think is really good. Because that allows me to have input on all of the people who are picked, and ultimately, policy is personnel,” RFK Jr. said. RFK Jr. mentioned that Tulsi Gabbard is also on the transition team. “We need you for the health stuff,” one of the hosts commented. “You know, I don’t know exactly what my function will be in there but I’ll do something with public health,” RFK Jr. said. “You got to run in 2028,” one of the hosts said. “Will you?” another asked. “I don’t know what I’m going to do,” RFK Jr. responded. WATCH: Robert F. Kennedy Jr Hints at What His Role Might Be In the Trump Administration & a Possible 2028 Run?? "Right now they've asked me to be on the transition team, which I think is really good because that allows me to have input on all of the people who are picked…I don't… pic.twitter.com/I5UYwD5SmZ — Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) September 11, 2024 “No matter what state you live in, VOTE TRUMP. A Trump victory is a Kennedy victory,” RFK Jr. said Tuesday. WATCH: Bottom line: No matter what state you live in, VOTE TRUMP. A Trump victory is a Kennedy victory. pic.twitter.com/GBn2p2RLnX — Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) September 10, 2024 “Yes, we’re joining forces to defeat government corruption, restore free speech, and Make America Healthy Again,” he said. Yes, we're joining forces to defeat government corruption, restore free speech, and Make America Healthy Again. #MAHA pic.twitter.com/mDywiP4Inl — Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) September 10, 2024 Per Daily Mail: In a linked video he explained that voting for Trump is ‘the only way that we can get me and everything I stand for into Washington, D.C. and fulfill the mission that motivated my campaign.’ He added that a contested election would further fracture the country and so Trump needed to win in a ‘landslide’ in both the popular and Electoral College vote. Trump lost the popular vote in both 2016 and 2020 – but won the Electoral College count in 2016, awarding him his one term in office. Kennedy launched his presidential run in April 2023 as a Democrat attempting to challenge President Joe Biden. The move alienated members of his famous political family. Watch RFK Jr.’s full interview on “Full Send Podcast” below:

Her second solo album, Sirin, finds her in a more confident and assertive place – she’s even reverted to the original spelling of her name

Even 20,000 third-world unvetted people pouring into a small town of 60,000 people won’t deter some from their woke ideology. Take the father of the boy killed by a Haitian driver. The father of Aiden Clark wishes a 60-year-old white man killed his dead son. “I wish that my son, Aiden Clark, was killed by […] The post Parents of Aiden Clark Wish Their Son Was Killed by an Old White Man appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

On Tuesday, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that a proposed constitutional amendment that would strip pro-life protections in the state would appear on the ballot in November.  The court overturned a decision from a circuit court judge that had said that Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, the pro-abortion group backing the amendment, did not follow state law in the language it used for the ballot initiative. The amendment would ban the state government from passing laws that “infringe upon a person’s fundamental right to reproductive freedom.” “Today’s decision is a victory for both direct democracy and reproductive freedom in Missouri,” said Rachel Sweet, campaign manager for Missourians for Constitutional Freedom. “The Missouri Supreme Court’s ruling ensures that Amendment 3, the Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative, will appear on the November ballot, giving voters — not politicians — the power to decide on this critical issue.” The initiative would prohibit the government from passing any laws that ban abortion before “fetal viability.”  Pro-life advocates have expressed concerns that the amendment’s use of “fetal viability” leaves the door open for effectively all abortions because it allows viability to be defined by the “good faith judgment of a treating health care professional and based on the particular facts of the case.”  Lawyers with the Thomas More Society had challenged the ballot language on behalf of Missouri State Senator Mary Elizabeth Coleman, pro-life advocate Kathy Forck, state Rep. Hannah Kelly, and Our Lady’s Inn President and CEO Peggy Forrest. Last week, Missouri Circuit Court Judge Christopher Kirby Limbaugh, a cousin of the late conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh, ruled in their favor, saying that the ballot organizers violated state law by not including language in the initiative that would make clear what current Missouri law would be repealed by adopting the amendment.  Tickets for “Am I Racist?” are on sale NOW! Buy here for a theater near you. “It is deeply unfortunate the court decided to ignore laws that protect voters in order to satisfy pro-abortion activists who intentionally omitted critical information from the initiative petition,” Thomas More Society lawyer Mary Catherine Martin said. “This ruling takes away important protections from all Missouri citizens to serve the well-funded political goals of a few. Missouri’s Amendment 3 will have far-reaching implications on the state’s abortion laws and well beyond, repealing dozens of laws that protect the unborn, pregnant women, parents, and children—a reality that the initiative campaign intentionally hid from voters.” At least 10 states will vote on abortion in November, including Florida, Nebraska, Montana, South Dakota, and Arizona.  Democrats have made abortion a key campaign topic for the 2024 elections, with Vice President Kamala Harris repeatedly attacking former President Donald Trump over the issue during the debate on Tuesday. Harris promised to sign a bill that would create a federal right to abortion, while Trump said the issue should be decided at the state level.

Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris met at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where they debated over foreign policy, economic policy, abortion and other topics. Here is a fact-check of some of their claims. “But what Donald Trump did—let’s talk about this—with COVID is he actually thanked President Xi for […]

NOW WE KNOW WHY BIDEN'S TEAM PICKED ABC... 'MODERATORS' SPEND ENTIRE DEBATE TAKING SWINGS AT TRUMP, PROTECTING KAMALA... ‘Disgraceful’: ABC News Roasted For Repeatedly Fact-Checking Trump While Letting Kamala Slide (VIDEO) Viewers took to X on Tuesday to criticize ABC News debate moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir for alleged bias against former President Donald Trump during the debate against Vice President Kamala Harris. Harris and Trump squared off in their first and so-far only scheduled debate as the race between them remains tight.