After 9/11, the Afghan Muslim immigrant was interrogated by the FBI and asked about her background. The post Kamala Names Muslim Liaison Who Wore Orange to Support Gitmo Terrorists appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

Shameless and dangerous for the nation. The post The Harris Flop Would Be Scarier Than Her Flip appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

Heading off a scandal that would’ve implicated the inner circle. The post Now Even the New York Times Wants Biden to Resign appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

Iran creates pro-Kamala site, hacks Trump accounts, leaks materials to media. The post Iran is Helping the Kamala Campaign appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

The Harris campaign tapped Israeli-born former peace negotiator Ilan Goldenberg as liaison to the Jewish community. The linked article left out Goldenberg’s more important qualifications for a communist president. There aren’t all that many Jewish voters, and the Muslims will quickly bury the power of their vote. Goldenberg is a prime example of someone on […] The post If You Want to Know How Kamala Will Treat Jews, Here You Go appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

The media have done an amazing job of spinning up Kamala Harris as a candidate because she has done nothing so far. They have created an extraordinarily impenetrable echo chamber, an echo chamber so strong it is effectively a cone of silence for the American people. For example, Time Magazine published a cover of Harris titled, “The Reintroduction of Kamala Harris.” The reintroduction of Kamala Harris https://t.co/noW5TOgawP pic.twitter.com/iLmQIhxOeF — TIME (@TIME) August 12, 2024 Does she need a reintroduction? She’s been reintroduced for the last 10 years. She was the attorney general of California. She was a senator from California. She ran for president. She lost. Then, she became the vice president. She failed. And now, she’s running again. It’s an extraordinarily powerful echo chamber because according to Time itself, Kamala refused to engage in an interview with Time Magazine. So, Time Magazine featured Kamala Harris on their cover, a subject who will not deign to speak with them. All of Harris’ reported momentum is reliant on the continued spin of the media and her continued silence, because if she ever has to emerge from the bubble that has been created around her, she will immediately meet with reality and begin to melt. But that only happens one of two ways: if one of the members of the media decides to get honest and do their job, which is not going to happen, or if there is so much outside pressure on Harris to actually come out of the bubble. Then she would meet with reality, which would be very bad for her. Thus, the media are now attempting to protect not only Harris, but also the bubble they have built around her. They can’t just protect Harris. They have to protect the bubble. They are the bubble.  So what’s the biggest threat to the bubble? The possibility of a competitor arising who might, in fact, penetrate human minds to the same extent they do by going around them. Which brings us to Elon Musk. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show The legacy media has attempted to choke off alternative sources of information for years. There’s really nothing new happening under the sun since 2016 when Donald Trump won. There has been an overt effort by regulatory agencies in Europe, by Democrats, in the United States, by organizations like the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, to shut down alternative sources of information by depriving them of revenue, by declaring their work misinformation or disinformation, and by telling social media to siphon off traffic from anything that is not the legacy media. The bubble had to be maintained. If the media loses that bubble, they lose everything. They don’t just lose their business. They lose their political influence as well.  So on Monday, they trained all their guns on Elon Musk. The real reason they were mad at Elon for buying Twitter (now X) in the first place was, of course, that Twitter had been part of their Praetorian Guard. Twitter was part of the team. Run by Jack Dorsey, Twitter was a place where you could be banned, as Jordan Peterson was for mentioning that boys are not girls. Twitter was a place where, if you took heterodox political positions, Twitter would make moves to shut down your distribution and reach. They would shadow-ban you; it happened to me, as well as many others. But then Musk bought it. He opened it up. And he made clear to everyone what Twitter was doing. That’s what the media could not stand. Since that day, they’ve been scared of Elon, and they’ve been scared of anyone who’s willing to provide a counter to their bubble. On Monday, that broke out into the open because Donald Trump came back on X (formerly Twitter) in advance of his interview with Elon Musk on X Spaces. Musk is a Trump-supporter at this point. He has come out and said that he’s voting for Donald Trump. He has pledged money to PACs associated with Trump. He wants Trump to win. As opposed to Trump, who will walk into hostile places to do interviews, everyone understands that if Kamala Harris gets off the teleprompter for 37 seconds at a time, she’s in dire trouble. So the entire bubble — the Democrat apparatus, the human centipede that is Democratic politicians, their press offices, and the entire media — that entire apparatus was threatened by Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which is the only way to explain why they went off their rockers. They called out the big guns. They started freaking out. And it was not just Democrats; it was members of the media and regulators in Europe. This could not be: to threaten the informational monopoly they have created over the course of decades. In advance of the interview yesterday, Thierry Breton, who is a member of the European Commission, wrote a letter to Musk in advance of the interview issuing a threat:  As you know, formal proceedings are already ongoing against acts under the DSA …  we cannot exclude potential spillovers in the EU. Therefore, we are monitoring the potential risks in the EU associated with the dissemination of content that may incite violence, hate and racism in conjunction with major political — or societal — events around the world, including debates and interviews in the context of elections. … My services and I will be extremely vigilant to any evidence that points to breaches of the DSA and will not hesitate to make full use of our toolbox, including by adopting interim measures, should it be warranted to protect EU citizens from serious harm. In other words, he was saying, “Shut the hell up or we are going to come after your company and destroy you.”  That’s how threatened they are. That’s how scared they are of the possibility of the legacy media applecart getting upset. And it wasn’t just the Europeans; it came from America too. The Washington Post ran a news piece titled, “Elon Musk’s X feed becomes megaphone for his far-right politics.” The entire article revolved around how Elon Musk is Right-wing and that’s bad and he’s far-Right. A Washington Post pseudo-journalist named Cleve Woodson was in the White House pressroom on Monday prior to the Musk interview. He actually asked the White House why Musk was allowed to interview Trump, saying: Elon Musk is slated to interview Donald Trump tomor- — tonight on — on X.  I don’t know if the president is going to tune in. Feel free to say if he is or not. But I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It’s a — you know, it’s an America issue. What role does the White House or the president have in sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter- — intervening in that? One of the most astonishing elements of the American media is that no one clamors more loudly about the importance of the First Amendment. But for American media, the First Amendment only applies to them when they see freedom of the press being protected. They do not see freedom of the press as a subsection of an amendment dealing more broadly with freedom of speech. They see themselves as the special elite who have been elected by the Fates in order to express free speech. You don’t get to. But they are members of the press, which means they have extravagant and magical capacities to engage in free speech.  But you don’t. Elon Musk doesn’t. President Trump doesn’t. Why? You, Musk, and Trump are not members of the press. You do not have the stamp of approval. And thus free speech does not really apply to you. * * * WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI

United States Olympic gymnast Jordan Chiles has been told that she must return the bronze medal she received at the Paris Olympics following her women’s floor exercise. On Monday, a statement from USA Gymnastics said that they will continue to fight for Chiles to keep her medal, but that its appeal was “denied by a Court of Arbitration,” the Associated Press reported. “USA Gymnastics was notified by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on Monday that their rules do not allow for an arbitral award to be reconsidered even when conclusive new evidence is presented,” USA Gymnastics said in a statement. “We are deeply disappointed by the notification and will continue to pursue every possible avenue and appeal process, including to the Swiss Federal Tribunal, to ensure the just scoring, placement, and medal award for Jordan,” the statement added. Chiles performed in Paris and initially she received a score for her floor exercise of 13.666, putting her in fifth place behind Romanian gymnasts Ana Barbosu and Sabrina Maneca-Voinea, who both had final scores of 13.700, as previously reported. The USA coach Cecile Landi argued that the judges had inaccurately assessed the difficulty level of the routine, and they agreed, bumping Chiles’ score up to 13.766. This put her in 3rd place ahead of the Romanian gymnasts and earning her a Bronze medal. USA Gymnastics has submitted additional evidence to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. pic.twitter.com/GOKymbAtcq — USA Gymnastics (@USAGym) August 11, 2024 However, Romania disputed the ruling, saying the American team’s complaint wasn’t submitted within the 60-second window that was required. On Sunday, the IOC [International Olympics Committee] announced its decision to strip Chiles of her bronze medal and give it to Barbosu. WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI USA Gymnastics then submitted “a letter and video evidence to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, conclusively establishing that Head Coach Cecile Landi’s request to file an inquiry was submitted 47 seconds after the publishing of the score, within the 1-minute deadline required by FIG rule,” the statement read. It also noted that the “time-stamped, video evidence” was “not available to USA Gymnastics prior to the tribunal’s decision and thus USAG did not have the opportunity to previously submit it.” The letter requested that the “ruling be revised and Chiles’ bronze-medal score of 13.766 reinstated.” USA Gymnastics could try to appeal to the Swiss Tribunal or the European Court of Human Rights, the AP noted. Chiles has remained mostly quiet on the controversy, telling her Instagram followers on Sunday, “I am taking this time and removing myself from social media for my mental health, thank you.” Amanda Harding contributed to this piece. Related: USA Gymnastics Challenges Demand For Jordan Chiles To Return Bronze Medal, Says It Has Receipts

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said she tells Republican leaders, “We’re out to get you, you’re dead,” and likened Donald Trump to a fascist, weeks after Trump was shot in the ear by a would-be assassin. Pelosi pounded the table angrily in an interview with reporters while “dispensing wisdom that sounds like a mix of a crime boss and local party activist,” The Washington Post reported. Following the assassination attempt on Trump, President Joe Biden gave an Oval Office address that said that political rhetoric has a role in contributing to violence. “We can’t allow this violence to be normalized,” Biden said. “The political rhetoric in this country has gotten very heated. It’s time to cool it down. And we all have a responsibility to do that.” “Unity is the most elusive of goals right now, nothing is more important for us now than standing together,” he said. “We debate and disagree.  We compare and contrast the character of the candidates, the records, the issues, the agenda, the vision for America. … Politics must never be a literal battlefield and, God forbid, a killing field.” But in an interview days later, he said that he would not change any of his own rhetoric, implying oddly that it was rhetoric from Republicans that caused the Republican nominee for president to be shot. In that interview, he also could not think of a single nice thing to say about Trump. He said Trump “wants to be a dictator on day one.” If the premise that Trump is a fascist or dictator were true, violence would conceivably be justified. The Post said Pelosi is focused “squarely on defeating Trump, whom she called ‘unpatriotic’ and whom she compared to fascist regimes for his attempts to destroy faith in independent media.” “Nothing that I do has anything to do with him, except his downfall,” Pelosi said. She said she refuses to be friends with Republicans who like Trump, and when freshmen Republicans asked her to attend invitations focused on their shared Italian heritage, she refused and said, “I do not like you. I’m out to get you, I’m out to get you.” WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI Biden also used violent language about House Speaker Mike Johnson after the Trump assassination attempt. When a reporter told him that Johnson said a Democrat bill was “dead on arrival,” Biden said, “he is — dead on arrival.” The refusal to tone down violent rhetoric on the part of Democrats comes despite political violence being primarily a Democrat problem. Democrats attempted to kill congressional Republicans at a baseball practice, and went to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s house with a plan to kill him. All presidents assassinated in history were Republicans except John F. Kennedy, who was killed by an apparent communist. Both Biden and Pelosi cited an attack on Pelosi’s husband as a parallel to the shooting of Trump, but Pelosi’s husband was attacked by a hammer by a homeless illegal immigrant hippy. Biden also drew an analogy to the “violent mob attacking the Capitol on January 6th,” even though many of the protesters were gun owners, and yet the only person shot was Ashley Babbitt, a protester who was killed by a police officer. That framing of January 6, even under intense pressure to draw bipartisan equivalencies about assassination attempts, raises further questions about a pipe bomb that the FBI claimed was found at the Democratic National Committee on January 6. Kamala Harris, now the Democratic nominee for president, was at the DNC at the time, yet instead of using it as an example of the seriousness of that day, authorities hid the fact that Harris was ever there, instead falsely filing paperwork saying she was at the Capitol. The bureau said it could not figure out who placed the bomb there, despite rounding up more than 1,000 people who were present at the Capitol using cell phone data and other techniques. An FBI whistleblower said the bureau quickly zeroed in on a former government official in Virginia, and that he was ordered to stake out the home then abruptly pulled off of it. Video shows the bomb planter waving to a police officer. Harris and other Democrats have gone out of their way to never mention the pipe bomb since, leading Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) to allege a “coverup.”

Actor Dennis Quaid said that Facebook has been “throttling advertising” for his upcoming film, “Reagan,” due out in theaters in late August. In a letter sent to Newsweek, Quaid said, “Facebook is once again censoring the free flow of ideas, deciding what’s best for us to see and hear; only this time it’s throttling advertising and promotion for my movie about Ronald Reagan.” “Like the old Soviet Union—are we turning into a country of tech oligarchs who control the platform of groupthink to silence the individual or ‘other’ groups?” he continued, noting that no one at Facebook had even seen the movie yet. In addition to Quaid’s complaints on the issue, director of digital marketing Eric McClellan sent a letter directly to Mark Zuckerberg. In the letter, he cited a particularly “egregious” example of Facebook’s attempt to quell their advertising. The ad in question, McClellan wrote, was nothing more than a photo of Quaid with the movie’s title, “Reagan,” and a quote from the late President Ronald Reagan: “Don’t let anyone tell you that America’s best days are behind her—that the American spirit has been vanquished. We’ve seen it triumph too often in our lives not to believe it now.” According to Newsweek, Facebook did allow them to publish the post – but refused to allow them to pay to “boost” it in order to achieve a greater reach. The reason given for the denial, McClellan said, was as follows: [The ad] “mentions politicians or is about sensitive issues that could influence public opinion, how people vote and may impact the outcome of an election or pending legislation.” WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI “Zuckerberg is ultimately responsible for all of this because his company says it might influence the presidential election, but the last time Ronald Reagan’s name was on the ballot was 40 years ago,” Quaid added. “My challenge to Facebook is to ask if any of these tactics were used against other recent presidential biopics like ‘Lincoln,’ ‘LBJ,’ or ‘Southside with You,’ a film about President Barack Obama, which was also released during an election year.” “Reagan” is scheduled for release in theaters on August 30. Dennis Quaid reminds us of ‘Reagan Democrats’ during his presidency. REAGAN in theaters August 30th. pic.twitter.com/k5tkdyiJP1 — Reagan The Movie (@ReaganMovie) August 7, 2024

Many expecting parents look forward to their ultrasound appointments when they are pregnant. It grants them a chance to see the beautiful life growing. While traditional ultrasounds are exciting all on their own, a couple in Brazil got an extra special treat. These parents got to see a 3D ultrasound of their child. Baby Smiles At Dad’s Voice In 3D Ultrasound Unborn baby smiles at dad’s voice https://t.co/CnCUoJb6mh pic.twitter.com/mIu6v4e9f2— New York Post (@nypost) August 12, 2024 According to the Cleveland Clinic, an ultrasound is “a noninvasive imaging test that shows structures inside your body using high-intensity waves.” 3D ultrasounds differ slightly from the typical 2D ultrasounds given at checkups. UT Southwestern Medical Center states, ” In a 3-D ultrasound, many 2-D images are taken from various angles and pieced together to form a three-dimensional image.” This couple in Brazil experienced exactly that. The NY Post shares that “a routine ultrasound scan at 32 weeks captured the incredible moment an unborn baby appeared to smile at the sound of her father’s voice.” When you watch the video, you can see the truth in that statement. The father is excited when he sees the three-dimensional image of his child appear on the screen. He begins talking to his baby. As soon as the baby hears his voice, a tiny smile appears on its face. The baby’s face returns to a neutral position when he is not talking, but as soon as he begins to talk again, that adorable smile returns. In that same post, the doctor performing the 3D ultrasound tells the NY Post, “The baby is definitely listening if the family talks at home…and they will begin to identify them.” Your Baby Is Listening While this may seem surprising, data supports this doctor’s claim. According to the Lozier Institute, “the earliest evidence of a fetus responding to sound is at 16 weeks. However, the fetus consistently responds to external sounds between 22 and 24 weeks.” That means that during the second trimester of pregnancy, your baby can hear you and is beginning to recognize and respond to sounds. This includes the voices of their parents. If you want to see this magical response, schedule a 3D ultrasound to see your adorable baby’s smile just like this lucky couple did. The source of the featured image can be found here. The post Parents Get 3D Ultrasound And Baby Is The Spitting Image Of Father appeared first on InspireMore.