The opening ceremony of the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris, France, turned heads while prompting backlash from some faith-based viewers.

Bringing back the glory days of 2020. The post New BLM Riots Incoming appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

No living perp and no trial. So why the interview? The post FBI Wants to “Interview” Trump About Assassination appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

A ridiculous ad campaign for Kamala was manufactured to continue the gaslighting of America. Some strategist came up with a ‘White Dudes for Harris’ campaign. When they are not gaslighting us, they are concocting grassroot supporters. Kamala is still incompetent with terrible policies like Joe Biden’s, only worse. There is also a White Women for […] The post Fake Ad Campaign: White Dudes for Harris appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Prince Harry made it clear that he won’t be taking his wife Meghan Markle back to the United Kingdom anytime soon because he said it’s “still dangerous.” During his appearance on ITV’s documentary “Tabloids on Trial,” the Duke of Sussex said that he’s worried about bringing the Duchess of Sussex or any member of his family to the country without adequate security, People magazine noted. “It’s still dangerous, and all it takes is one lone actor, one person who reads this stuff to act on what they have read,” Harry said. “And whether it’s a knife or acid, whatever it is, and these are things that are of genuine concern for me,” he added. “It’s one of the reasons why I won’t bring my wife back to this country.” Following Prince Harry and Markle’s decision in 2020 to step down from their senior royal roles, RAVEC (a committee made up of the Home Office, Metropolitan Police, and the Royal Household) announced that it had removed the royal family member’s automatic right to taxpayer-funded U.K. police protection. ‘He doesn’t even have to stop for red lights!’ Former Royal Correspondent for The Sun, Charles Rae, says that Prince Harry is being ‘disingenuous’ in his concerns for his safety in the UK, given the security measures he has. ? Become a GB News Member: https://t.co/mNsRsGCG3N pic.twitter.com/dTq47W35hO — GB News (@GBNEWS) July 26, 2024 In February, the London High Court ruled in favor of the government and found that there had been no “procedural unfairness” in how the Duke of Sussex was being treated — despite his attorney’s argument that Prince Harry still faced security threats, the BBC reported. Prince Harry had argued that there was unlawfulness in how he was being treated when his security protection was being made on a case-by-case basis rather than automatically being given at the same level he previously had. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Though parts of the decision were redacted, the court agreed with RAVEC’s decision, calling it “legally sound” to treat the royal’s protection the same as any other high-profile visitor to the U.K., the outlet noted. Prince Harry has said he plans to appeal the decision after claiming that he needed the security protection for his kids, Princess Lilibet and Prince Archie, when they are in his native home. “The U.K. is my home,” the royal previously said. “The U.K. is central to the heritage of my children and a place I want them to feel at home as much as where they live at the moment in the United States.” “That cannot happen if there is no possibility to keep them safe when they are on U.K. soil,” he added. “I can’t put my wife in danger like that, and given my experiences in life, I’m reluctant to unnecessarily put myself in harm’s way too.” The Duke of Sussex also offered to cover the costs, but earlier this year, the High Court denied his offer and upheld the decision to downgrade his security, as previously reported. The Home Office argued that it would be improper for the police to be hired as private security guards, The New York Times noted. Related: ‘Delinquent’: Prince Harry And Meghan Markle’s Foundation No Longer Allowed To Raise Money