News Resistor Will Smith Will Learn Some Wild Secrets About Technology in Resistor Would capitalism really allow for this level of hidden tech? Discuss. By Molly Templeton | Published on June 18, 2024 Screenshot: Paramount Pictures Comment 0 Share New Share Screenshot: Paramount Pictures It’s back to the shiny world of science fiction for Will Smith (Gemini Man, pictured above), who is set to star in Resistor, a retitled adaptation of Daniel Suarez’s 2014 novel Influx. (Weird title change, no?) According to Deadline, this project has been in development for a while—long enough for two drafts of the script, a first one by Zak Olkewicz (Bullet Train) and the latest by Eric Singer (presumably the one who co-wrote Top Gun: Maverick, and not the drummer from Kiss). Four years ago, S.F. Wilson was attached to direct, but at present the film does not have a director. Deadline notes that the plot details are “under wraps,” but one can draw some conclusions from the book synopsis: Physicist Jon Grady and his team have discovered a device that can reflect gravity—a triumph that will revolutionize the field of physics and change the future. But instead of acclaim, Grady’s lab is locked down by a covert organization known as the Bureau of Technology Control.The bureau’s mission: suppress the truth of sudden technological progress and prevent the social upheaval it would trigger. Because the future is already here. And it’s [sic] rewards are only for a select few.When Grady refuses to join the BTC, he’s thrown into a nightmarish high-tech prison housing other doomed rebel intellects. Now, as the only hope to usher humanity out of its artificial dark age, Grady and his fellow prisoners must try to expose the secrets of an unimaginable enemy—one that wields a technological advantage half a century in the making. Resistor does not yet have a release date.[end-mark] The post Will Smith Will Learn Some Wild Secrets About Technology in <i>Resistor</i> appeared first on Reactor.

News Smile 2 Naomi Scott Tries to Grin and Bear It in Smile 2 Trailer The malevolent grinning force has attached itself to someone a little more famous this time… By Vanessa Armstrong | Published on June 18, 2024 Credit: Paramount Pictures Comment 0 Share New Share Credit: Paramount Pictures Stop smiling at me! That’s what Naomi Scott screams at one point in the Smile 2 trailer released today. Her freakout is reasonable! She plays a music star named Skye who witnesses a friend start maniacally smiling as he kills himself by bashing his face in with a dumbbell weight. The film is a sequel to 2022’s Smile, which has a similar premise: some supernatural force makes people smile in decidedly creepy ways and cause harm to themselves and others. In Smile 2, the big shift seems to be that the person who this malevolent grinning force hones in on is Skye, a famous pop star, rather than an unknown doctor. Here’s the synopsis: About to embark on a new world tour, global pop sensation Skye Riley (Naomi Scott) begins experiencing increasingly terrifying and inexplicable events. Overwhelmed by the escalating horrors and the pressures of fame, Skye is forced to face her dark past to regain control of her life before it spirals out of control. In addition to Scott, Smile 2 stars Rosemarie DeWitt, Kyle Gallner, Lukas Gage, Miles Gutierrez-Riley, Peter Jacobson, Raúl Castillo, Dylan Gelula, and Ray Nicholson. It is written and directed by Parker Finn, who also brought us the first film. Smile 2 grins its way into theaters on October 18, 2024. Check out the trailer below. [end-mark] The post Naomi Scott Tries to Grin and Bear It in <i>Smile 2</i> Trailer appeared first on Reactor.

Movies & TV The Watchers Who Watches The Watchers? Unfortunately, Me If you’re going to take the time to make a movie, you should have some sort of reason for doing it. By Leah Schnelbach | Published on June 18, 2024 Comment 0 Share New Share This film and I got off on the wrong foot immediately, because the voiceover talks about a massive forest in the west of Ireland that lures “lost souls” in and won’t let them leave—which is a great opening to a spooky horror film, except for the fact that Ireland has been largely deforested, first because the English took most of the trees, and then just… capitalism. And sure, this forest is a magical liminal space, and I’m probably overreacting a little bit because of various bone-deep feelings about Irish history. But still: wrong foot! And also let’s be honest: all the right feet in the world couldn’t have salvaged this movie. This is the kind of movie where the main character stares into a rearview mirror so she can make Significant Eye Contact with a parrot, perched in his cage in the backseat, and tells the parrot that today is the fifteenth anniversary of her mother’s death. The parrot has no response. Later on, a seemingly happy-go-lucky person will blurt out that their dad was an abusive drunk—and that’s their character development sorted. A person will be confronted with a revenant version of a loved one, be understandably very upset about that for the duration of one scene, but then be A-OK by the next scene. And of course, a thiarna dean trocaire, Ishana Night Shyamalan has embraced the family tradition of dumbass twists. Just in case you actually want to see it for yourself, I‘ll keep to light spoilers until a clearly marked full spoiler paragraph below. The basic plot is that several people have been lured into a haunted forest that won’t let them leave, and for reasons that are never explained the forest seems to be able to target people who are living through particular trauma. (Except for the couple people who seem fine until they’re traumatized by the forest—but whatever, I’m not here to argue with haunted liminal trees that don’t exist because the English fucking took them.) If one of these lost souls is lucky, they stumble across a bunker called “The Coop”—alas, not this Co-op—and shelter there each night, as a group of creatures called “The Watchers” gather outside a two-way mirror to, well, Watch them. Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures First: as I said, the acting is all fine. Dakota Fanning is believably haunted by the death of her mother, even when that is expressed by her choice to wear a brunette wig and pick up a perfectly nice-seeming dude at a bar with a story about being a professional dancer, which is then presented to the audience as a moment of dark depravity. (I’ve known way less traumatized people who have based hookups on far bigger lies—this moment comes across much more as an adolescent’s idea of what a tragic adulthood looks like.) Georgina Campbell gives a solid performance as Ciara, who I think is supposed to be spinning between shock at the disappearance of her partner, and a forced optimism that they’ll all escape The Coop soon, but the character herself is so unbelievable that it never quite works. The same issues apply to Daniel, played by Oliver Finnegan. Finnegan does a great job, but the character is supposed to be overcompensating for his fear through a sort of manic energy (this turns out to be masking trauma, naturally) but I was never sure quite how old he was meant to be. Best of the group was Olwen Fouéré as Madeline, an older woman who had been studying the Watchers before the forest captured her, and who seems to know their ways and enforces the rules that keep everyone safe. Unless, of course, she’s making those up. The creepiness of the forest is good, and the initial moments when Mina realizes she’s trapped are legitimately frightening. The inherent terror of being in a room knowing that things you can’t see are watching you through a fake mirror, and could theoretically break through that mirror at any moment and rip you to shreds—that goes a long way! And Shyamalan is initially good about not quite showing us the Watchers to maximize their unsettling, scuttling presence. But as with all of these types of movies, you eventually crash into the wall of: are these things real, or not? Is this an experiment someone conducting on unknowing test subjects? Is Madeline lying about all this, à la several of the films by Shyamalan pere? Now about The Coop! There’s a table, a couch, a TV, a record player… and a bucket. Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures And it’s here that my questions truly began. This is a tiny, concrete, art gallery-looking space, and four strangers are living in it—and three of them just lost a member who disappeared into the forest right before Mina showed up. But none of them act like people in that situation. But more, you’re telling me that a traumatized girl who’s been living in Galway, a small city, alone in her own apartment, has essentially been trapped in a bunker with a giant window and she just rolls with it? That she pisses in the bucket in the corner with three strangers in the room? That the other three people are all just OK with each other? That the person whose partner has disappeared isn’t in obvious shock? That they’d be at all functional? This is basically like they’ve been put in a panopticon style prison, for no reason, with no hope of escape or release, and their every move is being watched by monsters, and this movie posits that they aren’t just shaking crying wrecks huddled on the floor? Did I mention that The Watchers don’t give them food or water? So they spend their days (while The Watchers conveniently sleep in burrows) maintaining traps for birds and squirrels, which, come to think of it, I’m not sure they can cook except over open fires in the woods before the sun goes down. But again—there’s electricity. Mina spends the nights watching the TV and DVDs The Watchers have kindly provided—they’re all old seasons of reality TV show, obviously, for maximum panopportunities—and Ciara plays music and dances for The Watchers, but none of these people spend their days trying to trace the power lines to any sort of source. A few people have tried to leave, but when you hit a certain point it seems like the edges of the forest send you back, and then once the sun goes down and The Watchers come out you’re doomed. Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures They’re there for a while, but no one’s hair looks particularly greasy, their clothes don’t appear to be stained. I can’t remember seeing any toilet paper, either? Or, for that matter, any personal hygiene stuff? Which again, perhaps I’m missing a point, but I feel like if you’re going to make a film with this premise you need to go with it. There were people who got mad at Poor Things for not including scenes of Bella Baxter dealing with menstrual blood. My mileage with that was fine because the movie was already trafficking in fantasy tropes, and was kind of a fairy tale about a revivified corpse. I was willing to give it all the slack it needed to work. But here, a huge point of the film should be that these people are trapped together, No Exit style—except that unlike in No Exit they’re all living mortals, and have bodies to cope with. That’s going to create conflict and embarrassment and body horror that absolutely needed to be the ground floor of this film before it even got to the rest of its ideas. Then, partway through the film, they discover a trapdoor in the floor. They discover it by… moving a throw rug. This is not like a “John Wick has to sledgehammer through several feet of concrete floor to get to his secret storeroom” situation. It’s just a rug. This also isn’t a “this new secret door just appeared due to like magic or whatever”—the door has apparently been there the entire time. Under a rug. You’re telling me that at no point did any of the three younger, less resigned people upturn every single thing in the tiny-ass bunker looking for a way out??? A secret room???? Some sort of control panel, anything that would help them escape????? You’re telling me they didn’t find it by accident while looking for food?????? Or a hospitality basket full of tampons??????? Or a goddamn shower???????? And can I talk about that parrot for a minute? It’s really clear that none of these people have spent five minutes with a bird, because they’re noisy and messy and VERY opinionated and, oh yeah, NEED TO EAT. And, oh yeah, these people have to hunt and forage for their food. But no one suggests eating the Golden Conure that Mina has so conveniently brought into The (goddammit) Coop? And the bird isn’t, oh, I don’t know, shrieking at them all the time? Demanding attention while they try to sleep, presumably all huddled into the only bed together, which I’m sure that doesn’t get awkward at all, but please understand me when I tell you that bird would be making their lives far more of a hell than any Watcher ever could. It’s a good thing they don’t eat him, though, since he turns out to be integral to the plot and can conveniently do the thing they need him to do, and seems to understand that they need him to do it. Now maybe you’re asking yourself right now: Leah, why are you so upset? Why do you care so much about something that was clearly just meant to be a silly summer horror movie? Because there are rules. If you’re going to make a ridiculous horror movie, you have to ground it in reality so the horror can actually land. There has to be some connection to a recognizable reality or we won’t know when the horror starts! And also: we have to at least give some sort of shit about the people in the movie! Even leaving horror aside, Road House is not a great film! It’s not a smart subversive take on an action movie, it’s goddamn ridiculous, but you do actually come away caring about some of the characters in it! There’s nothing to latch onto in The Watchers, until the last couple minutes, which I’ll get into in the promised spoiler section starting… now. Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures This movie tried to do something really interesting in the last ten minutes—and no I’m not referring to the aforementioned dumbass twist. The dumbass twist is twofold: The Watchers are ancient faeries (fucking FAERIES) that live underground and used to walk among humans and even intermarry with them, creating half-human/half-faerie hybrids. Part two of the twist is that Madeline is one of these creatures, and also a clone of the dead wife of the academic who built The Coop which is why she knows all the rules and habits of The Watchers, who rejected her for being of two worlds or whatever. And like, fine—the fact that Madeline isn’t really a human is obvious from the beginning, the fact that she’s obviously connected somehow to The Professor is obvious from the moment The Professor is first mentioned. The “faerie” plot is all just a riff on the mythology of the Tuatha Dé Danann, or Tuath Dé, a race of beings who were maybe the gods of ancient Ireland, who evolved into the aes sidhe or fae as their stories were told and retold through the centuries. (Those of you who have read Wheel of Time have clocked some familiar phrases by now.) The forest itself is a riff on a “thin place” a liminal space that is half in our world and half in the realm of the fae and/or the afterworld, an idea that was probably developed by Victorians who were trying to (re)create Celtic mythology as the culture rebuilt itself after centuries of English colonization. I’m saying “maybe” and “probably” a lot both because a lot of the origins of these ideas have been lost, they’re all really murky and tangled up, and because, let’s be real, who am I to say any of it’s mythological? If you dropped me in one of the remaining Irish forests I’d believe in all of this shit the second the sun went down. But the actual interesting part comes after those twists and reveals. Mina, Ciara, and Madeline have escaped the forest at last. Mina has realized that Madeline is a hybrid. And now Madeline has attacked Mina because, say it with me, the Watchers are a superior race and they should be the ones ruling the world, humans are boring losers, Magneto wuz right, yadda yadda yadda. And Mina, in the midst of being choked out by Madeline, blurts that she agrees with her. She tells Madeline to stay with her, that they can work together, that they were a family in The Coop and there’s no reason that should change. Madeline drops her, screams like a bird, unfurls wings that suddenly… exist, and flies away. In the epilogue we learn that Madeline has been following Mina—she spots her all the time in different guises. And here we see a very different movie opening up, a movie that doesn’t concern itself with twists and half-seen shots of Watchers in the shadows, and instead talks about loving the alien and realizing that the monster isn’t a monster. Hell, if you want to really go out on a limb of a tree that doesn’t exist anymore? There’s a story about colonization and its aftermath buried in one of the underground burrows of this movie. And this is why I get mad. Horror, especially horror, has an opportunity to be about something. Even the most ridiculous horror can have depth and meaning, it can offer a mirror or a door to people who feel misunderstood by most of culture. It can also offer absurd over-the-top fun. The Watchers took two different intriguing premises, and declined to do anything with either of them.[end-mark] The post Who Watches The Watchers? Unfortunately, Me appeared first on Reactor.

Call of Duty merchandise and gifts come in every form, from erasers to themed baby clothing. However, I have kindly shifted through the piles of often bizarre Call of Duty-themed merch out there to present you with nothing but the best gift ideas for Call of Duty fans in 2024. Call of Duty Gifts 2024 This list has something for everyone and all occasions, as long as they’re a CoD fan. But if you’re looking for some Destiny 2 gift ideas, we got you covered. Cymbal Monkey Bomb As an icon of Call of Duty Zombies, this gift is perfect for any fan of the game. The weird, red-eyed agent of chaos is a perfect buddy for any desk or shelf. This very nicely modeled statue is designed to hold your phone or tablet while you work, or to hold your controller when you’re not playing, hopefully preventing it from blowing you to pieces. Image: Amazon Simon ‘Ghost’ Riley dog tags merchandise What better way to remember the fallen on the battlefields of...

After building your hammer and claiming your plot in Pax Dei, you will probably want to start building your crafting stations and house, right? Well, this can get tricky. Here is how to fix the construction items not appearing glitch in Pax Dei. What is the building item glitch in Pax Dei? Fix, explained First things first, know that this issue is a glitch that is plaguing seemingly everyone. Pax Dei is still in Early Access and that means it is bound to have some glitches like the fact that some of your buildings won’t appear. Imagine not being able to craft in a crafting survival game. Well, that’s exactly what happens to several Pax Dei users. After you build your construction hammer and claim one of your two plot slots, you will be instructed to begin building the foundations of your house and even some crafting stations. Well, each of these craftable items is available in the build menu and you can see them appear when positioning them, but they will not a...

Pax Dei may be a pretty demanding game with all of your neighbors building and harvesting resources. To minimize the impact on your performance, you’ll need the best graphical quality settings. How to get the best performance in Pax Dei Pax Dei doesn’t have a lot of graphics settings for us to dive into, but enough to help performance for anyone experiencing issues. The only settings you’ll really have to bother with are “Overall quality” and “DLSS Mode.” And even playing with these settings won’t negate the building items not appearing glitch. Honestly, there isn’t a lot of difference between the High graphical setting and the Low. All I could really detect was a difference in ground textures; however, the grass looks completely fine in both High and Low settings. This means that it may not have much of an impact on performance, but is worth setting to low if you’re having issues. Next, I would adjust the DLSS ...

The new Divergent Universe game mode releases with Version 2.3 and allows you to partake in a whole new Simulated Universe. Let’s explain all the rewards to reap and challenges to tackle in this Divergent Universe guide for Honkai: Star Rail. How to play Divergent UniverseAll rewards How to access and play Divergent Universe in Honkai Star Rail On June 18 at 3 PM PT/6 PM ET, Honkai: Star Rail players will be able to access Version 2.3 which comes with the new Divergent Universe game mode. This is a new Simulated Universe mode which you can access through Herta’s Office at the Herta Space Station. There are quite a few interesting aspects of the Divergent Universe game mode that make it different from usual Simulated Universe modes. All your characters’ levels will be increased to meet the level cap required for your Equilibrium level. It’ll also counts for your characters’ Relics and Light Cones. This won’t happen to characters who are a...

President Joe Biden repeatedly has called climate change an “existential threat,” worse than nuclear weapons. Yet, Biden’s green energy mandates result in a greater U.S. demand for wind turbines, solar panels, and electric batteries from China, made by coal-fired power plants, increasing the emissions Biden criticizes at home. The United Nations Environment Programme estimates that in the absence of reductions in carbon emissions, temperatures will rise by about 3 degrees Celsius by the end of the century. The idea that such a temperature change is worse than deaths from nuclear weapons is ludicrous. Over 200,000 people died in the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki after America dropped atomic bombs to end World War II. Temperatures have varied for centuries. Climate models are not reliable and accurate enough to attribute global warming to human activities. The observed rate of global warming over the past 50 years has been weaker than that predicted by almost all computerized climate models. Thirty-six computer models overpredicted surface air temperatures during the summer growing season. The models all showed warming well above what happened in reality, with the most extreme model producing seven times too much warming. Increases in hurricane frequency are erroneously cited as an effect of warming. Although carbon dioxide emissions and temperature—both in America and globally—have increased over the latter parts of the 20th century, no meaningful increase in frequency and intensity of hurricanes has been observed. Hurricane damage has increased over time, but this outcome is largely due to increased incomes and wealth, and therefore creation of infrastructure, rather than more violent hurricanes. For example, homes in Florida have risen by a factor of 12 since 1975, according to the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank. The same sort of hurricane that in 1975 destroyed a house worth $100,000 would now destroy a house worth $1.2 million. Although some say increased CO2 levels are detrimental to human health and welfare, deaths are more likely to result from medical events triggered by the cold than by the heat. A 2020 study by Dr. Whanhee Lee and others, published in Lancet, showed that cold-related morbidity and mortality—strokes, heart attacks, blood clots, and other problems—result directly from the influence of cold temperatures on the body, which is unable to maintain sufficient core temperature to guarantee survival. In addition, Environmental Protection Agency data shows that death rates are about 10% higher in winter, and January is the deadliest month of the year in the Northern Hemisphere. If Biden truly thought that climate change was an existential threat, he would try to lower global emissions through greater U.S. exports of natural gas. This would enable other countries to reduce emissions by substituting natural gas for coal, just as America has reduced carbon emissions by 1,000 million metric tons over the past 16 years. In addition, Biden would try to expand emissions-free nuclear power if he thought climate change was a threat. He would make uranium mining easier, because uranium is a critical ingredient for nuclear power. Yet the president has taken swaths of land off the table for uranium development and made no attempt to solve the problem of nuclear waste. Instead, Biden blocks a new liquid natural gas export terminal in Louisiana, which results in greater worldwide use of coal, increasing global carbon dioxide emissions. Europe already has been turning to coal to deal with energy shortages in the aftermath of Russia’s cutoff of natural gas. New regulations at the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Office of the Controller of the Currency discourage companies from investing in natural gas and discourage banks from lending money to fund natural gas. Regulations from the Department of Energy raise the cost of natural gas stoves, water heaters, and boilers. Over the past 20 years, U.S. emissions of CO2 have declined by a billion metric tons as natural gas has been increasingly substituted for coal use in the generation of electricity. Over the same period, CO2 emissions in China have risen by 8.7 billion metric tons. Biden’s repetition that climate change is an existential threat gives him an excuse to impose more regulations and sign into law subsidies for favored donors. “Never let a good crisis go to waste,” Rahm Emanuel, now ambassador to Japan, said when he was President Bill Clinton’s chief of staff. Biden is inventing the crisis and the waste is following. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation The post Biden’s Hypocrisy on Climate Change Painfully Obvious appeared first on The Daily Signal.

A bipartisan group of 13 senators unveiled legislation Tuesday to protect victims of digitally altered “revenge pornography.” Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., are sponsoring the Take It Down Act to crack down on the practice of using artificial intelligence tools to create so-called deepfake pornography depicting other people. “In recent years, we’ve witnessed a stunning increase in exploitative sexual material online, largely due to bad actors taking advantage of newer technologies like generative artificial intelligence,” Cruz said in a written statement. “Many women and girls are forever harmed by these crimes, having to live with being victimized again and again.” Although “some states provide legal remedies for victims of nonconsensual intimate imagery,” Cruz said, it would help to create a uniform, federal law to aid in “removing and prosecuting the publication of nonconsensual intimate images nationwide.” The Texas Republican said the bill would “empower all victims of this heinous crime.” Emma Waters, a research fellow at The Heritage Foundation, explained how the deepfake videos work. “These AI-generated photos and videos, dubbed ‘deepfakes,’ can be produced in a matter of minutes on a multitude of apps and websites,” Waters wrote. “The technology is simple. Anyone can use ‘face swap’ on ready-to-use apps, such as DeepSwap and FaceSwapper, to place someone else’s likeness in a sexually explicit photo or video.” The Cruz-Klobuchar bill wouldn’t just go after creators of deepfake pornography; it would force websites that publish the material to take it down within 48 hours once notified. A one-page explanation of the legislation lays out four points about what it would and wouldn’t do. The bill would criminalize publication of such videos without consent, protect “good faith disclosure” of the videos to law enforcement, require websites to remove the offending material, and is “narrowly tailored” to punish criminal acts without “chilling lawful speech.” A similar bill was introduced in the Senate by Majority Whip Dick Durbin, but Cruz and Klobuchar have criticized that measure for being too broad in scope. The Hill quoted Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., one of the senators endorsing the Take It Down Act, as saying that Durbin’s bill would “stifle American technological innovation.” The post Cruz Announces Bill to Crack Down on ‘Deepfake’ Revenge Porn appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. These days, as the saying goes – you can’t swing a cat without hitting a “paper of record” giving prominent op-ed space to some current US administration official – and this is happening very close to the presidential election. This time, the New York Times and US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy got together, with Murthy’s own slant on what opponents might see as another push to muzzle social media ahead of the November vote, under any pretext. A pretext is, as per Murthy: new legislation that would “shield young people from online harassment, abuse and exploitation,” and there’s disinformation and such, of course. Coming from Murthy, this is inevitably branded as “health disinformation.” But the way digital rights group EFF sees it – requiring “a surgeon general’s warning label on social media platforms, stating that social media is associated with significant mental health harms for adolescents” – is just unconstitutional. Whenever minors are mentioned in this context, the obvious question is – how do platforms know somebody’s a minor? And that’s where the privacy and security nightmare known as age verification, or “assurance” comes in. Critics think this is no more than a thinly veiled campaign to unmask internet users under what the authorities believe is the platitude that cannot be argued against – “thinking of the children.” Yet in reality, while it can harm children, the overall target is everybody else. Basically – in a just and open internet, every adult who might think using this digital town square, and expressing an opinion, would not have to come with them producing a government-issued photo ID. And, “nevermind” the fact that the same type of “advisory” is what is currently before the Supreme Court in the Murthy v. Missouri case, deliberating whether what no less than the First Amendment was violated in the alleged – prior – censorship collusion between the government and the Big Tech. The White House is at this stage cautious to openly endorse the points Murthy made in the NYC think-piece, with a spokesperson, Karine Jean-Pierre, “neither confirming nor denying” anything. “So I think that’s important that he’ll continue to do that work” – was the “nothing burger” of a reply Jean-Pierre offered when asked about the idea of “Murthy labels.” But Murthy is – and really, the whole gang around the current administration and legacy media bending their way – now seems to be in the going for broke mode ahead of November. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Surgeon General Murthy Advocates for Digital ID to Combat Online “Misinformation” and Protect Youth appeared first on Reclaim The Net.