When did conservatives last hear such widespread media opposition to a president nominating “unqualified, extreme, and controversial” appointees to high government positions? As a past Ronald Reagan Office of Personnel Management nominee, I can attest to the fact that he was rebuked as strongly as Donald Trump is today, including by old regime Republicans.  In both cases, the correct response is that the country was in deep peril and the establishment figures who could easily pass the elite political correctness test were not nominated. These establishment figures had proven they were unwilling to take the heat necessary to make the necessary reforms. Many, indeed, were part of the problem, benefiting from their own policies that had caused the decline. In both situations, the Washington government itself had become the major cause of the nation’s problems and required radical reform. As a Reagan agency head in his revolutionary administration, we cut domestic bureaucracy by 100,000, reduced its retirement and health benefits, and based pay on job performance rather than merely on showing up. Reagan slayed hyperinflation by working with a courageous Fed chairman. He block granted 77 Washington programs to states and won the Cold War without firing a shot. All of which was opposed by that day’s media and elite experts. It is not unreasonable to argue that the crisis facing President-elect Trump today is even worse than it was back then, as has been demonstrated often by The American Spectator alerts. Sixty percent of Americans simply have little trust in how the national government is run. The Constitution itself is under fire. Defense and foreign policy are in crisis. Basic government administration, legal and FBI administration, the economy, and social life policies are all fundamentally flawed. And each failure will require tougher leaders. The fact is that the country is in dire need of bold leaders, especially for defense and intelligence, those with the daring to speak and act on the facts rather than play the Washington-style go-along-to-get-along game. In my introductory lecture to potential Reagan political appointee wannabees, I would ask them if they wanted to be a success in D.C. All agreed they did. My truthful response was, “Then don’t do anything and you will be remembered well.” In fact, Reagan’s best executives all ended up in “trouble” in the Washington go-along world. Reagan himself said courage was the essential attribute of leadership. Today’s elite media, from progressive analyst E.J. Dionne Jr. to former “strong-government conservative” George F. Will, quickly label controversial Trump’s nominees as “ doozies” and “ghastly,” especially focusing on four among the scores. Why might they oppose appointees who might not leak inside information to them? Outsider Trump is wise enough to prefer a young and outspoken veteran who will raise controversial issues about military readiness to be secretary of defense. He chose a tough former Democratic congresswoman for director of national intelligence. A “vaccine skeptic” was proposed for the Health and Human Services secretary. And he supported a does-not-get-along-with-peers congressman to shake up the Department of Justice. Defense is by far the most important national government responsibility and the one most in need of change. Every war crisis in U.S. history has required us to replace desk generals, who are experts in bureaucratic media survival, with real field generals, like Grant and Patton, who know war is about violence. Trump’s defense nominee, Pete Hegseth, was an Iraq and Afghanistan non-field grade infantry major and Bronze Star awardee and remains an Individual Ready Reserve officer. A Washington Post review of his book, The War on Warriors, seemed offended that Hegseth insisted that the mission of the Department of Defense was “the business of killing.” He even suggested the name be changed to its pre-1947 designation as the Department of War.  Like Patton, Hegseth spoke the truth rather than in Washingtonian euphemisms. The Washington Post conceded that “while he praises women’s historical service in noncombatant roles,” Hegseth opposed President Barack Obama’s opening combat roles up to women. He cited “biological differences between men and women, including greater muscle mass among men,” which he said made women “less apt for the demands of combat.” Men are “gasp, biologically stronger, faster and bigger,” adding that such combat “diversity” puts “everyone at risk.” And, “Men who are pretending to be women, or vice versa, are a [further] distraction” from the main defense mission. Hegseth was involved in a he-says-she-says matter that was not prosecuted and has opposed Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion standards. He blamed the Joint Chiefs of Staff for adopting DEI for themselves and many other top positions. This, he argues, is relevant because it is a “signal to average men and women in the military that leaders care more about media attention than actual problems and people. Worse, by peddling the lie of racism in the military — which they knowingly did — they [the top military leaders] sully the reputation of an institution they purport to lead.” These days it may be too difficult to confirm someone to such a high government position who will speak this bluntly about military truths. But such rarity is essential for serious leadership in the country’s most important Cabinet position. National intelligence is a close second in importance though. Wall Street Journal investigative reporter Holman Jenkins has demonstrated over the years, beyond any reasonable doubt, that these agencies have collaborated to improperly influence politics at least since 2016. They have especially targeted Trump for the past eight years, costing him reelection in 2020 and preparing the way for court cases and impeachment trials. Those illegal, hidden, and politicized spy net activities must be rectified. Director of National Intelligence nominee Tulsi Gabbard may just have the courage to take on the mission as a former Democratic congresswoman who is not afraid to take on enemy leaders. And I support anyone willing to accept this hazardous mission. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is certainly a wild card as secretary of Health and Human Services — one who is seriously critical of the “experts” at the Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, and the Food and Drug Administration. Although his specific past positions can be questioned, he insists that he will follow Trump’s policies and rely upon his agency appointees, rather than merely supporting his own positions. Indeed, these very health bureaucracies have long been criticized on the Right. Sen. Rand Paul announced he will become the chairman of the Senate Committee on Health and will especially investigate the “COVID cover-up” and other health bureaucratization.  Rep. Matt Gaetz, of course, has withdrawn his nomination for attorney general and he certainly had opponents on the Right as well as the Left in Congress. But he still might have been worth the effort. Over the past four years, the simple fact is that the Department of Justice has been turned into the “department of political lawfare,” especially against the incoming president. It is not a coincidence that former attorney generals like Ed Meese and critic Bill Barr supported Trump for president as a result of this fundamental abuse of the law. Gaetz was not confirmable. We need someone with his conviction but without the baggage. So much of this is up in the air since it is not clear what the appointment rules will be. However, the whole process actually may be much better planned than outsiders think. What is essential for nominees is to follow the law and presidential direction. Cabinet secretaries are leaders who must have good relations with the president and know how to explain programs through news and podcast media, as most of Trump’s top ones do. Few have deep technical knowledge and can leave these matters to strong administrative deputies, agencies, and assistant secretaries.  As perceptive mainstream media critic, Karen Tumulty has noted, controversial nominations actually could be “some kind of clay pigeon on Trump’s part” as a means to use the sympathy and chaos resulting from the failure of controversial appointees to assist the other less controversial nominees through the process relatively unscathed. If all is done early enough, as is the case now, the clay pigeons can prepare the way for the next appointees. In politics, it is the big picture that counts.  Donald Devine is a senior scholar at the Fund for American Studies in Washington, D.C. He served as President Ronald Reagan’s civil service director during his first term in office. A former professor, he is the author of 11 books, including his most recent, The Enduring Tension: Capitalism and the Moral Order, and Ronald Reagan’s Enduring Principles. READ MORE from Donald Devine: What Are Serious Conservatives to Do About the Presidential Election? What Cracked Up Conservatism in the 1990s, and What Can Recover It Today? The Media Is Clueless About Shift Toward ‘Populism’ The post Controversial Appointees, Clay Pigeons, and Successful Governmental Politics appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

WASHINGTON — Mike Waltz, Donald Trump’s choice to serve as his national security adviser, is a brilliant pick. A decorated combat veteran who boasts that his wife served more combat tours than he did, Waltz is the first Green Beret to be elected to Congress. Rep. Waltz has worked in the Pentagon and at the White House, so he knows the bureaucracies with which he will have to contend. At a side event during the Republican National Convention this summer, I watched Waltz lay out the national security threat matrix across the globe with a fluency that suggests he’ll need no on-the-job training. He’s a hawk who appreciates Trump’s reluctance to go to war as well as the president-elect’s commitment to deterring Chinese ambitions and standing with Israel. Waltz won’t weigh down his mission with electric vehicle mandates and DEI mantras. The position does not require Senate confirmation, although Waltz likely would have snapped up votes on both sides of the aisle. When he gets to work at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., he will be focused on winning the release of seven American hostages in Gaza. He has already met with their families. When I heard that Trump picked Waltz, I cheered. I had the opposite reaction to Trump’s Nov. 13 announcement that he had chosen Rep. Matt Gaetz to serve as his attorney general. It was a choice that stunned Washington, a town that had gotten used to Trump doling out important positions to supporters whose loyalty to Trump exceeded other qualifications. (READ MORE: Trump v. Washington) When Gaetz announced Thursday that he was withdrawing from consideration for the job, no one was surprised. He was, after all, a controversial pick to be the nation’s top lawman in the midst of an ongoing House Ethics Committee investigation into a host of sexual misconduct allegations, including that the congressman had sex with a 17-year-old girl. As the New York Times reported: Since the spring of 2021, the [House] ethics panel had been investigating Mr. Gaetz over an array of allegations, including that he had engaged in sexual misconduct and illicit drug use, shared inappropriate images or videos on the House floor, misused state identification records, converted campaign funds to personal use and accepted gifts that violated House rules. Gaetz has denied these allegations. It is important to note that the Department of Justice did not file charges against Gaetz after years of investigation. On Wednesday, the Ethics Committee voted not to release a report and postponed deliberations on its release until Dec. 5. Because Gaetz resigned from the House last week and is no longer a member, the ethics probe into alleged sexual misconduct has come to a close. On social media, Trump thanked Gaetz and predicted the former congressman “has a wonderful future.” Trump’s antipathy toward the Department of Justice is understandable given its shameful role in peddling the bogus “Steele dossier” that smeared Trump with salacious disinformation. Putting Gaetz in charge of the Department of Justice must have seemed like getting even to Trump. Trump wasted no time in selecting a new nominee. He selected former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday night. Clearly an improvement. Contact Review-Journal Washington columnist Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@reviewjournal.com. Follow @debrajsaunders on X. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM READ MORE:  Draining the D.C. Swamp Picks Up Steam Saving The Country With Russ Vought Five Quick Things: Trump’s Cabinet Picks Are a Political Sea Change The post Trump Picks His Cabinet, Breaks China appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

If there ever was a Biden Doctrine on foreign policy, the accompanying tagline would be “Don’t Win.” He has been consistent in this philosophy since his first term in the Senate, when he opposed supporting Vietnam in 1975, through his disgraceful exit from Afghanistan during his presidency. With the experience from his first term, Donald Trump has the opportunity to craft a strategic foreign policy doctrine consistent with his political approach. Below, are a few suggestions as pillars for a Trump Doctrine: Never start a war, but if forced into one, win it decisively. This should be the motto for a Trump doctrine, similar to Teddy Roosevelt’s “Walk softly but carry a big stick.” Democratic administrations have had a bad habit of dabbling at war. They have used military force to send conflicting and mixed signals that allow our enemies to understand perfectly how much they can get away with and how far they can push. The lesson is to never draw a line in the sand that you are not willing to enforce. Don’t engage in regime change and nation-building. We have failed miserably in every attempt at regime change and nation-building we have attempted since World War II and the Marshall Plan. Former Secretary of State Colin Powell was right when he said, “You break it, you bought it.” The same holds true with nation-building in our image. The Marshall Plan worked because it empowered populations — even Japan and Germany — that wanted to become capitalist democracies and get back on their feet. They, at least, had a foundation to build on. Most of the third-world states that we try to reconstruct in our image are nowhere near that stage. We should instead triage foreign aid to those nations that show genuine promise for realistic progress and could become useful partners. Leave the rest to the Peace Corps at minimal cost, if possible. Unleash the Israelis on the Iranians. Virtually every conflict in the Middle East is being egged on by the Iranians. The Biden administration’s attempts to engage with Iran merely rewarded bad behavior. Instead of restraining the Israelis, we should let them decapitate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, destroy oil production, and eliminate Iran’s nuclear program. This would cripple their ability to support Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. Iran is an existential threat to Israel: It is a regional annoyance to us. Engage with China but do it from a position of strength. China is a world power wannabe, but her self-centered exploitative view of the rest of the world is a key strategic weakness, as is the vulnerability of her export-oriented economy. Our real military leverage toward her is not aircraft carriers or small platoons of Marines plinking at her warships from islets and shoals in the South China Sea. Rather, it is our nuclear attack submarines. Trump should make it perfectly clear to Beijing that, if she attacks Taiwan, we can sink her amphibious fleet from a distance and then blockade her exports thereby strangling her economy for the duration of the conflict. The fly in the ointment here is that it would take our entire existing attack submarine fleet to do this. To make the threat truly credible, we need to increase the attack submarine inventory by a third to cover the rest of the world. There should also be a diplomatic element of the Trump doctrine toward China. Beijing has taken advantage of our neglect in the Pacific to expand her influence. This is particularly true of the Solomon Islands where China has turned the autocratic leader into a virtual puppet. Reversing this trend would be relatively easy and cost-effective. The president could start by inviting the heads of state of the Melanesian, Micronesian, and Polynesian nations to Washington for state visits and one-on-one conversations with him. This would build lasting friendships. There should be an economic approach as well. Significant tax breaks for investment in the Western Pacific would go a long way toward offsetting predatory Chinese infrastructure projects in the region while not significantly raising government costs. Likewise, a Radio Free Pacific effort (similar to Radio Free Asia) would be a significant, but inexpensive, way to demonstrate our interest in the region by utilizing information operations. Continue to demand that NATO partners pull their weight. Nations such as Canada and Spain, which underinvest in NATO, had good reason to mourn Trump’s election. He should continue his promise to make each NATO member pull its own weight. Emulate Teddy Roosevelt in resolving the Russia–Ukraine War. Teddy Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1906 by successfully mediating an end to the Russo-Japanese War. He was able to do it because the United States had no dog in the fight. Despite the Biden administration’s support for Ukraine, the United States has no vital interests in the outcome of the conflict, and Trump has a good relationship with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. His transactional approach to negotiations could help to bring about at least an armistice until a permanent end to hostilities is negotiated. Make the Navy and Marine Corps great again. Since they landed on the shores of Tripoli, the Marines have been the nation’s go-to force in a crisis, and the Navy has been their ride. No matter how hard a nation tries to avoid conflict, stuff happens. This includes national disasters and the need to evacuate American citizens from crisis areas. The value of using the Navy and Marine Corps in such situations is that they are viewed as a temporary presence. Whereas the Army, with its heavy footprint, gives the impression of an invasion. The ability to launch military operations from a ship implies an American desire to resolve the situation and be gone. This is a significant diplomatic signal. Unfortunately, neither capability exists today. The Biden administration allowed the Navy and Marine Corps to atrophy due to some very poor decisions by an egocentric and incompetent Marine Corps commandant. The Marines have morphed into a China-centric defensive force. Worse, the Corps allowed, even encouraged, the Navy to reduce the number of required amphibious ships needed to maintain a presence in the world’s three most dangerous regions. Putting America first means not getting us into situations that we can’t walk away from if needed. The capability to do that is gone with the degradation of the Marines and the Navy’s amphibious fleet. Worse still, the Marines divested themselves of the tanks, bridging, and heavy engineering assets needed to contribute materially to a major regional conflict such as Desert Storm or Iraqi Freedom. This was so they could instead buy anti-ship missiles of dubious use in a conflict and redundant with systems existing in the other services. (READ MORE: The Marine Corps Has Gone Off the Rails) Unfortunately, the current commandant has doubled down on his predecessor’s mistakes. He should be removed and replaced by someone dedicated to rebuilding the Corps, even if it means bringing back a competent general from retirement. Likewise, the chief of naval operations, a DEI quota filler, should also be removed and replaced with a warfighter who can rebuild the Navy. It will take at least a decade to restore the Navy and Marine Corps to their former greatness, but we need to start somewhere. (READ MORE: Wokeness Is Responsible for the Military Recruitment Crisis) A Trump Doctrine would need a whole-of-government approach. There are four major pillars of national power: diplomatic, information/Intelligence, military, and economic, otherwise referred to as DIME. All four need major improvements to repair the damage that the Biden administration has done to national power and prestige. Gary Anderson is a retired Marine Corps colonel. He was a special advisor to the deputy secretary of Defense and is the author of BEYOND MAHAN; A NAVAL STRATEGY FOR THE 21st Century READ MORE from Gary Anderson: The Marine Corps Has Gone Off the Rails Wokeness Is Responsible for the Military Recruitment Crisis Trump Is an Extraordinary Manager of Client Nations The post 7 Ways to Move Toward a Trump Doctrine appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

by Martin Armstrong, Armstrong Economics: Former CDC director Robert Redfield, an outspoken critic of Antony Fauci, believes COVID-19 had sinister origins. We know the NIH was funding gain-of-function research under Fauci at a lab in Wuhan, China. However, Redfield believes the virus leaked from a domestic lab located at the University of North Carolina. Redfield […]

by J.B. Shurk, All News Pipeline: In the background of everything I write is a recurring message: human freedom is invaluable, and we must fight for it daily.  We are not “biological programs” or “redundant machines,” as the techno-fascists at the World Economic Forum would describe us.  We are not “useless eaters” whose mere presence threatens the […]

EDITOR’S NOTE: For a limited time, the Q-Link pendants are on a special Buy One, Get One Free sale.  If you’ve had your eye on one, or want to get a couple for Christmas gifts, now’s the time to load up!  The sale will only last few a few more days before they take it down.  Don’t know what a Q-Link?  Then keep reading and I’ll fill you in! (This article would be banned if it was printed in the USSR under Stalin.) Now that the Establishment has lost the election, we know they want to try to stop the Inauguration on January 20th. What moves do they have left? Turning off the power grid? Perhaps that will be part of it. Let’s look at what their role models, the Communists, did: Bolshevik leader, Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Davidovich Bronstein) developed a ‘slow starvation’ strategy. This was used to murder millions of Christians by creating a famine. So will they attack our food supply? It seems to be one of their go-to moves. Good thing lots of us are already growing our own food. BUT have you ever tried growing food in winter? If you want to start growing food now, what are you going to do? Are you out of luck? Nope. The secret you need is…. Use electro culture.  It involves copper coils. Nikola Tesla knew about the power they harnessed. When used properly, it will also defend against 5G. You see, this technique will not only help your garden in winter, but it will also super size your food! AND it will also speed up the growing process. This may be the very thing that gives you more than enough to weather what’s coming our way. What is electro culture? It’s a technique in harnessing energy to boost the plants growth. But the government used the media to attack it and used slurs against those that benefited from it. Here’s 3 pages from Justin Christofleau’s book, Electroculture (1927): (That’s a link to a free PDF of the book) Some are even recreating what they want us to forget:   How is it done? Well, the main tool to this government concealed technique is copper. The problem is it created an ABUNDANCE of food. And the food was too large. And too plentiful. We know that’s not good for our greedy overlords. They live by the rule of scarcity. So they convinced farmers that if they grow too much food, the price they charged for food would go down, and they wouldn’t sell as much, and they’d have to throw it away and lose profits. Didn’t take too long for the farmers to abandon this technique. But we aim to live by the rule of abundance, to take back what was stolen from us long ago. In every area. So we’re rediscovering how things used to be in regards to our food. Here’s a short clip that shows the results of using electro culture for your garden: Have you guys ever heard about electro culture? Look at the results people are achieving with their fruit and vegetable harvests pic.twitter.com/gUAyFfXLyk — Kevin – WE THE PEOPLE (@bambkb) April 23, 2024 It’s basically a copper wire wrapped around a stick. (It doesn’t have to be a bamboo stick). Our current farming practice is completely backwards. Use tools that are covered in rust on food that we consume? Terrible! Why do you think Electroculture was banned? pic.twitter.com/XHfDllMLUK — Olive (@MaygaSpunky) June 1, 2024 More and more people are jumping in and trying out electro culture. And they’re blown away by the results! I am beyond blessed Every Morning There is more then yesterday…If you haven’t tried #Electroculture Copper is a gameChanger. pic.twitter.com/BpBZQg6Vup — 0⃣BlackBetty (@BabyD1111229) June 18, 2024 Give it a try! It’ll be a fun experiment you can do and watch the results over the summer. Just to remind you, there’s different thickness when it comes to copper wire. The thicker, the better. So swing by Lowe’s or Home Depot and have them cut it off the spool for you, rather than the thin one that comes in a pack for about $7. But the thin wire would be good if that’s all you’ve got. There’s energy all around us that we can tap into. This isn’t some ‘spiritual’ or ‘new age’ idea. That’s the lie we’ve been told. This is just science, omitted from the school books. Check this clip out. A guy is getting energy from a tree – he plugs a light bulb into it and it lights up! This is why electroculture works so well Everything is electric This is also why grounding is so important Dont forget to touch some dirt my dudes pic.twitter.com/4Vkmg2BKep — Rufus_2688 (@No_Curve) September 13, 2023 And if you’d rather have a “done for you” solution, these are my favorite ones currently on Amazon and the ones I purchased and use in my own garden (and at the time I’m writing this you can also clip a 5% off coupon too right on Amazon): SEE IT HERE: These antennas also seem to mess with chem trails. Look thisElectroculture breaking up the Chemtrails During the resets from (1900s to 1940s) they removed the fractal antennas from the old world buildings because they balanced out the atmosphere. Thankfully with electro culture we can bring that back pic.twitter.com/dm8JIDD9jl — nikola 3 (@ronin19217435) January 15, 2024   “BUT how do you apply this to my body? To my health and against dangerous 5G?” Good question. First let’s look at how 5G affects your blood. (Ignore his anti-Trump remark. Trump has a plan to deal with 5G) 5G at the 60 Ghz transmission spectrum prevents the oxygen in your body from binding to the hemoglobin(blood). This disrupts the oxygen distribution in your body, thereby starving your body of oxygen. 5G is now being installed in schools. Trump supports the 5G kill grid pic.twitter.com/nBikDqz3WB — Richard Reichle (@RichardReichle) July 23, 2020 This guy tests the blood of those affected by 5G smart meters. He shows what the blood looks like – it’s shocking! 5G SMART METER Radiation DESTROYS Blood Integrity & Oxygenation pic.twitter.com/fki1P79ERX — Redpill Drifter (@RedpillDrifter) August 14, 2023 Okay. Now let’s look at how grounding affects your blood. (Grounding is when you walk barefoot in dirt or grass, or touch the ground or trees) Look at these red blood cells before and after grounding pic.twitter.com/N2Db7woHpf — Plana Terra (@usnational7) October 4, 2023 The blood cells are charged from the electrons absorbed from the earth. That keeps them separated from each other, meaning, they won’t clump but they’ll flow as they should. Before and After Impact of 40 minutes of grounding on appearance and clumping of bloodhttps://t.co/1pla0EqNsy pic.twitter.com/8L0yhEmM6c — Remnant | MD (@RemnantMd) August 16, 2023 What if you’re like me, and you don’t have a grassy yard? Also, how long can you walk barefoot in your busy schedule? 5 minutes a week? (Well, you can touch trees. There’s a reason why “tree huggers” were mocked by the Establishment. But how long are you gonna hug that tree?) That’s why the 2nd option I suggest is: Wear a Q-Link pendant. Within each pendant is 75 feet of super fine copper filament coil, similar to that used in electro culture. And right now they have an EARLY BLACK FRIDAY Sale:  Buy One, Get One FREE! That applies to any color of the acrylic version! (seen in pic below) That means both you and your spouse, family member or your best friend, will be set for the price of one! To Claim BOGO offer: At least 2 Acrylic Pendants must be in the cart in order for this promotion to work. As long as there are two in the cart, (the less expensive) one will show at $0.00. If you select 4, you get 2 free, and so on. (When you get one for a gift, DON’T WAIT TIL CHRISTMAS TO GIVE IT! Most likely their body could use it NOW) Let’s check the blood cells of those that wear the pendant. Looks almost identical to the results from grounding! But with grounding, you’re only doing that for a few minutes, maybe an hour? Then the shoes go back on and you’re back to the real word. The effects start to go back. But the necklace? You just leave it on all day and all night. 24/7 protection! So far, over 1 million of these bad boys have been sold. The company states the technology in the pendant will give you: More vitality, greater focus, improved performance, and better stress response. Many wearers claim it helps your body to deal with EMFs (electro magnetic frequencies). I believe it helps, not by stopping the EMFs, but by boosting the state of your body so it will combat the effects of EMFs. I was shocked to discover that one of the founders who came across this technology happened to perform and record with The Beach Boys! In fact, a whopping 97% of the golfing subjects improved their stress levels. And that was from wearing the pendant for LESS than 1 minute.     SFGate reports: Jimmy Page, one of rock’s all-time guitar heroes, is featured on the cover of this month’s Rolling Stone sporting his from way back. TruthinAging tested it out: When I put it on, the effects were astoundingly immediate.  This was when I returned from a trip to Scotland and had to DJ that night.  My schedule would have had me slipping in and out of consciousness around 10pm, but wearing the Q-Link had me showing no signs of fatigue. In fact, I felt great! I’m sharing this because I want to share my own personal testimonial with you. A Q-Link helped my mom, who was huffing and puffing as she tried walking up the stairs. I’ll never forget seeing that. It disturbed me. Her health wasn’t the same after having a stroke last year. I was worrying that she might have another. Then it dawned on me. “Duh, get her a Q-Link!” Of course. I just had a feeling in my gut (that was probably God) to order her one. Within 1 to 2 days, she was back to normal! Click here to get your own Q-Link, and get a 2nd on FREE! NOTE: The FDA requires that I say that this is just my personal testimonial, from my own personal experience.  Things I have witnessed.  I cannot tell you these are medical devices, because they are not.  I cannot claim they will diagnose, treat or cure any disease, health or medical condition whatsoever. Here are some other unsolicited testimonials I found from people who had similar experiences to me: Here’s a review from a tech YouTuber, stating how it helped him fall right to sleep for the first time in ages, instead of the usual tossing and turning. So give it a try. Fight back against the control of the Establishment. Take control of your own food in your own garden and wrap some copper wire around sticks and pop ’em up all over. And take control against the harmful 5G that’s hitting your body and put a Q-Link around you neck. TAP HERE TO GET YOURS AND A 2ND ONE FREE! Nothing in this article shall be deemed as claiming any product can diagnose, treat or cure any disease, health or medical condition whatsoever.  We cannot give you personalized medical advice.