YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Avanceret søgning
  • Log på

  • Nattilstand
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    Om • Vejviser • Kontakt os • Udviklere • Fortrolighedspolitik • Vilkår for brug • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Vælg Sprog

  • Bengali
  • Chinese
  • Croatian
  • Danish
  • English
  • Filipino
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Indonesian
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Persian
  • Swedish
  • Urdu
  • Vietnamese
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Nattilstand
Fællesskab
News Feed (Home) Populære opslag Begivenheder Blog Marked Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Tilbud
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • Bengali
  • Chinese
  • Croatian
  • Danish
  • English
  • Filipino
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Indonesian
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Persian
  • Swedish
  • Urdu
  • Vietnamese
Om • Vejviser • Kontakt os • Udviklere • Fortrolighedspolitik • Vilkår for brug • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Opdage indlæg

Posts

Brugere

sider

Gruppe

Blog

Marked

Begivenheder

Spil

Forum

Jobs

Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
25 i

WARNING: Trump's DHS to Bring in AI Digital Beast System/Klaus Schwab's AI Governance Infrastructure
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

WARNING: Trump's DHS to Bring in AI Digital Beast System/Klaus Schwab's AI Governance Infrastructure

WARNING: Trump's DHS to Bring in AI Digital Beast System/Klaus Schwab's AI Governance Infrastructure - WARNING! TRUMP'S HOMELAND SECURITY BEGINS INSTALLING KLAUS SCHWAB'S AI GOVERNANCE INFRASTRUCTURE! - 4,848 views November 19, 2024 Herding Humanity Nations Conspire: https://www.youtube.com/@nationsconspire - FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES Mirrored From: https://www.youtube.com/@HerdingHumanity
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
25 i

MTG: AG Matt Gaetz Will Prosecute Those Responsible For 'Crimes Against Humanity' During Covid-19
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

MTG: AG Matt Gaetz Will Prosecute Those Responsible For 'Crimes Against Humanity' During Covid-19

During a Congressional hearing on Thursday, November 15, 2024, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene suggested that Matt Gaetz, after he is approved as the Attorney General of the United States, will punish those responsible for "crimes against humanity" during the Covid-19 pandemic. While discussing the country's response to the pandemic in the Congressional hearing entitled "Preparing for Future Pandemics", Greene railed against Dr. Anthony Fauci, former chief medical advisor to President Joe Biden, claiming he "lied to the American people" by "abusing his power and position." Greene also called out the government for its "repulsive" mask mandates and added that children were the "worst victims of malpractice and abuse of power." She previously compared the mandates to the Holocaust. On Wednesday, President-elect Donald Trump sent shockwaves through the political landscape when he announced the nomination of Gaetz to be his Attorney General. The pick has been met with a great deal of criticism, even from other Republicans. Greene, however, believes Gaetz will work to prosecute the officials responsible for what she considers to be "crimes against humanity". "Preparing for the next pandemic is actually recognizing that the last pandemic resulted in crimes against humanity," Greene said. "People that perpetuated and continue to perpetuate these crimes need to be prosecuted, and that needs to be starting in the next administration; and I'm pretty sure our next attorney general will do that and I look forward to seeing that happen." UTL COMMENT:- I don't think that he will - all / most of Trump's selections are part of the very swamp that he wants to 'drain'?? FFS!! I am very apprehensive about the whole thing...Trump is either ignorant or he's part of the whole thing...unfortunately I am feeling the latter... I HOPE and I PRAY that I am wrong.... Video clip source: https://rumble.com/v5pz7iz-marjorie-taylor-greene-vaccine-injury-testimony.html
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
AllSides - Balanced News
AllSides - Balanced News
25 i

Favicon 
www.allsides.com

As Trump Seeks Mass Deportations, Workplace Raids May Not Help Much

Just over a year into Donald Trump’s first term as President, immigration agents raided a meat processing plant in Bean Station, Tennessee, arresting 104 workers. It was the largest worksite raid in a decade. Two months later, 114 were arrested at a large-scale nursery in Sandusky, Ohio. The next year, immigration agents raided poultry plants in six towns in central Mississippi, arresting 680 workers in one day.  When Trump comes back to office in January, he plans to bring back the...
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
AllSides - Balanced News
AllSides - Balanced News
25 i

Favicon 
www.allsides.com

House Republicans signal support for proposal to ban bathroom access for 1st transgender member

House Speaker Mike Johnson signaled support Tuesday for a Republican effort to ban Democrat Sarah McBride — the first transgender person to be elected to Congress — from using women’s restrooms in the Capitol once she’s sworn into office next year. “We’re not going to have men in women’s bathrooms,” Johnson told The Associated Press. “I’ve been consistent about that with anyone I’ve talked to about this.”
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
AllSides - Balanced News
AllSides - Balanced News
25 i

Favicon 
www.allsides.com

SpaceX Starship launch live updates: Gigantic rocket takes flight as Trump watches alongside Elon Musk

SpaceX’s massive Starship rocket launched for its latest test flight at 5 p.m. ET, where the company didn’t catch its Super Heavy booster after takeoff. Today’s mission marks SpaceX’s fastest turnaround yet, with new upgrades to the booster’s propulsion systems aiming for a smoother and faster catch using the launchpad’s “Mechazilla” claws. President-elect Donald Trump attended the event with SpaceX CEO Elon Musk at the company’s Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas.
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
25 i

In the U.S. more women than men graduate from college, by a lot. What does it mean?
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

In the U.S. more women than men graduate from college, by a lot. What does it mean?

For much of human history, women faced societal and cultural obstacles to formal education. In some parts of the world, that’s still the case, but in the U.S., the barriers for women to enter and excel in higher education have all but disappeared. In fact, for decades, women have outpaced men in college enrollment and graduation rates.That’s good news for gender equality, but now American colleges and universities are facing a different dilemma, as the data shows that gender gap is widening. According to government data for the year 2021-2022 shared in Forbes, women accounted for for 62.8% of associate degrees, 58.5% of bachelor’s degrees, 62.6% of master’s degrees and 57% of doctoral degrees—a solid majority across all post-secondary degrees at every level. What does this mean? What's causing the growing disparity and what effect does it—or will it—have on society? from AskMen People shared their thoughts on these questions on Reddit and it's quite eye-opening. Here are various explanations for the gap:Women tend to be more attentive and engaged studentsSome teachers and professors shared their personal experiences with female students compared to male students, saying that women just tend to be "better" students in general."I work at a trade school for a very male dominated field and yet my female students are consistently my highest performers. They are typically the tops of their class, bring in more scholarships, and are the first to achieve certification by farrrrrr! They just typically seem more self motivated.""I'm a professor at a community college and I teach a trade. From my experience the women just have it together better than the men do. They know how to study, they come prepared, they're organized, they pay attention, they are more mature, they know how to manage time and prioritize what's important."Men and women are not equally incentivized to pursue higher educationMen have more options for well-paid work that doesn't require a college degree, including trades jobs that require greater upper body strength where men have an advantage. If women want to have financial independence, a college degree is their most promising path."A lot of younger dudes are told they can make more money not going to college. They are constantly hit with messaging about how the richest people in the world didn't go and so they don't have to. That they can be entrepreneurs or do get rich schemes with crypto, etc. They just see the amount of money they could make (which is complete speculation) vs the amount of money they will spend. Lastly, a lot of people have been told that college is a scam to get them into debt for the rest of their lives. Not to mention the whole military industrial complex that wants these men to go to the military instead of college so they do invade a lot of men's spaces like video games.Meanwhile women have been pushing other women to go to college for a many reasons like it still being one of the best ways to boost your overall income. College was one of the many things kept away from women and so modern women will take advantage of their rights." Women have more incentive to go to college.Photo credit: Canva"For a woman to not be financially dependant on a man, she needs an education. Financial independence. For decades, women were locked in terrible marriages because they couldn't get jobs that they could live on. Low paying secretarial and teaching jobs (much like today) were the only things available so they had to stay in destructive marriages to survive. Men knew this, probably why up until the 1960's, women were not allowed to make contracts, wills, buy or sell property or get a credit card without her husband or father co-signing. Only 1.2% of women went to college. The social changes in the 1960's led to women outpacing men in college starting in the 1970's. Honestly, women saw the value of a college degree more than men did. Still do, probably. It is the only way they can live their lives without being dependant on men.""Women’s salaries are enhanced by college to a much higher degree than men’s are. That’s partly because there’s seemingly a wider range of non-college jobs for men to go to and still earn a good salary. So some of what’s happening is an economic substitution effect where men are opting to do something equivalent."The trades aren't as viable an option for women—and not just because of physical differencesThe trades, unfortunately, are not always the safest avenue for women to take. Not to stereotype tradesmen, but anecdotal evidence about women's experiences highlight a genuine concern."I think women tend to go where other women are. Women can do plenty of a trades work that won't require a degree but can they do it and count on being safe at work? Construction workers have a reputation for harassing women, for example. It's just more of a necessity for women to get a degree and avoid manual labor alongside men. The kind of things you get away with in terms of how you interact with coworkers is much more controlled in an office environment. A big reason I went to college was how people at my uncle's contracting company treated each other and me when I helped out in the summer. I just didn't like dealing with the constant grab assing and I know it would be even worse for a woman." "My family besides my dad and one sister are all in trades work. Outside of a cousin who took over my uncle's auto shop all the women felt shit on in trades, everything from attempted assaults by coworkers and clients, to just dealing with misogynistic bullshit. They stick with it, but its a lot. I can see why, especially if you come from a working class family that was exposed to that, you'd be extra incentives to go to and stay in college. "Yep. I graduated trade school for painting/plastering/flooring/tile. Was the top of the class. Got onto a crew at 19 and it was hell.... I couldn't even climb a ladder without sick/gross comments. I left and never went back. I ended up doing housekeeping for a decade and broke into property management."Programs that encourage women to pursue degrees where they've traditionally been underrepresentedCertain fields, like STEM, were traditionally male-dominated, so programs to encourage and enable women to go into those fields have been created with success. There aren't really similar programs for men, despite the education gender gap. "Professor here in a STEM field that was predominantly male students for decades, many of the more successful programs are now predominantly female students. Our program became predominantly female in 2012. We collect information about our students attending the program and placement thereafter. The reasons for that change were elementary and secondary education programs promoting STEM for female students and lower pay than other tech and engineering fields, as well as, trades. I don't see this changing any time soon." Programs for women in STEM have exploded in the past few decades.Photo credit: Canva"There is no consensus on what causes this disparity or how to fix it. Potential root causes:Grading: Teachers have been found to grade girls more generously than boys (Study 1, Study 2)Teachers/Role Models: Teachers, especially for young boys, are overwhelmingly women (87% of elementary teachers are women)Government Support: The Women's Bureau works to create parity for women in the workplace. Leading up to Title IX, this agency researched and developed policies to increase the number of women college graduates. There is no Men’s Bureau developing policies to increase the number of men graduating college.Programs: There seemingly are many more programs promoting young women’s academic achievement than there are programs promoting young men’s academic achievement."Boys and young men are being pushed ahead in school before they're readySome people pointed out that boys mature slower than girls, which may account for some of the disparity."Let me recommend Of Boys and Men by Richard Reeves. His key point is the (a) boys mature later than girls and so (b) 'redshirting' boys makes a lot of sense. So for example, if a 5 year old boy seems maybe not quite ready for kindergarten, then keep them home another year, let them begin at age 6.Now fast forward to the last years of high school and into college, the issue becomes 'Peter Pan Syndrome,' boys/young men who don't want to grow up. I've seen that in my experience teaching college, it's not unusual for a '101' course to have one student who doesn't submit all the homework, skips classes, and so on, and in 20 years of teaching, it has always been men, not women. They flake out because of lack of maturity, and 13 years ago, maybe their parents should have just kept them home for one more year. Also, I've had men who did a military (including National Guard) term first, and they have told me that it helped them grow up.""I was that guy in college. I muddled through for 3 years before dropping out. I just didn't have the discipline to do the work, my days were all spent drinking, smoking, and sleeping. I wish I had postponed college for a couple years and worked a real job first, I think I would have been more appreciative of the opportunity."Boys and young men are being 'left behind'Culturally, some are pointing out, there's a difference in how males and females are perceived as a group when they fall behind. "There’s a lot of theories why guys tend to do more poorly than girls in school, and while some explain this as biological, most theories I’ve heard are cultural. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard moms or even some teachers saying how boys are being 'left behind' in academic settings. My own mom is a retired teacher and she would make comments about this stuff too (and she has a chip on her shoulder with males)." Boys tend to struggle with school more often, starting early on. Photo credit: Canva""When girls on average fall behind in a subject, there is a push to figure out why and correct it. For example STEM subjects have been made increasingly accessible to women. But when boys fall behind in a subject, there isn’t the same push at all, it’s just blamed on them. Boys are being failed, and at the same time being blamed for it. It’s a crazy way to approach educating children.""Men get told to pick themselves up by the bootstraps and figure stuff out themselves without any help. Meanwhile when women fall behind there's societal pushes to help them out. It's this lack of a more generalized outlook on who needs help that's part of the problem here."There are surely many reasons for the gender gap in education, but whatever they are, the disparity has implications for the employment market and research in various fields. While exact gender parity in all things is unrealistic, large disparity isn't ideal and deserves some thoughtful consideration no matter who is being outpaced.
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
25 i

Parent of LGBTQ kids has a perfectly colorful response to a neighbor who tried to shame him
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Parent of LGBTQ kids has a perfectly colorful response to a neighbor who tried to shame him

Sometimes, when we are met with unsavory behavior from others, a response is called for. But the real art is responding in a way that’s clear, strong and yet still peaceful. For an example for this, look no further than Xander’s dad, who was on the receiving end of hate from his neighbor. Rather than spewing back the same amount of vitriol, his colorful comeback had courage, wit and just the right amount of flair.As Xander tells us in the video, the retort came after the neighbor told his dad that having two gay kids (Xander’s sister Claire is a lesbian) meant he “failed as a parent.” “So dad took a moment then replied with this…” the onscreen text reads.Next thing you know, Xander’s dad can be seen filling his backyard with huge (like, parade level huge) rainbow pride flags. A dozen of them at least.The video ends with the words: “No, saying things like that does.” @fitxander Some AWESOME shade from my dad ?? #gay #dad @claire_training ♬ Kings & Queens - Ava Max Message received, Xander’s dad. In another video, we learn that the not-so-friendly neighborhood watch told his dad that he wasn’t allowed to fly “gay flags” anymore. @fitxander Follow me on IG for more ? #lgbtq #gay #pride ♬ original sound - audios But rather than accept defeat—or resort to cruelty—he simply looked at the rules, only to discover that his house was actually outside the map by 2 meters (6.5 feet). So up the pride flags went! And even more this time! Flag responses seem to run in the family. In another video, Xander explains that his neighbor (where have all the friendly ones gone?) said he couldn’t sell his house because of the small window-sized trans flag hung near the roof. So Xander got an even bigger one that covered the entire back side.Pride Flags have long been a nonviolent way to stand up for the LGBTQ community. And yet, they still manage to whip up plenty of heated controversy, particularly at schools. The original eight colors all had a specific meaning, and only one color (pink) denoted sexuality. Meaning that the pride flag was and is just as nuanced and dynamic as the people it represents.The flag has taken on many different forms over the years as it evolves to speak for more marginalized communities, but it remains a peaceful and artistic form of protest. One that always seems to get the message across. This article originally appeared two years ago.
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
25 i

Marlon Brando's compassionate insights on representation in Hollywood were far ahead of their time
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Marlon Brando's compassionate insights on representation in Hollywood were far ahead of their time

Marlon Brando made one of the biggest Hollywood comebacks in 1972 after playing the iconic role of Vito Corleone in Francis Ford Coppola’s “The Godfather.” The venerable actor's career had been on a decline for years after a series of flops and increasingly unruly behavior on set.Brando was a shoo-in for Best Actor at the 1973 Academy Awards, so the actor decided to use the opportunity to make an important point about Native American representation in Hollywood. Instead of attending the ceremony, he sent Sacheen Littlefeather, a Yaqui and Apache actress and activist, dressed in traditional clothing, to talk about the injustices faced by Native Americans.She explained that Brando "very regretfully cannot accept this generous award, the reasons for this being … the treatment of American Indians today by the film industry and on television in movie reruns, and also with recent happenings at Wounded Knee."The unexpected surprise was greeted with a mixture of applause and boos from the audience and would be the butt of jokes told by presenters, including Clint Eastwood. Littlefeather later said that John Wayne attempted to assault her backstage."A lot of people were making money off of that racism of the Hollywood Indian," Littlefeather told KQED. "Of course, they’re going to boo. They don't want their evening interrupted."Three months later, Brando explained his reasoning in an interview with late-night host Dick Cavett where he also discussed how all people of color are misrepresented in Hollywood. The interview was historic because Brando was known for avoiding the media. "I felt there was an opportunity," Brando told Cavett about the awards ceremony. "Since the American Indian hasn't been able to have his voice heard anywhere in the history of the United States, I thought it was a marvelous opportunity to voice his opinion to 85 million people. I felt that he had a right to, in view of what Hollywood has done to him."Brando’s eyes were opened after reading John Collier’s novel “Indians of the Americas.”“After reading the book I realized, I knew nothing about the American Indian, and everything that we are taught about the American Indian is wrong,” Brando said. “It’s inaccurate. Our school books are hopelessly lacking, criminally lacking, in revealing what our relationship was with the Indian.”“When we hear, as we’ve heard throughout all our lives, no matter how old we are, that we are a country that stands for freedom, for rightness, for justice for everyone, it simply doesn’t apply to those who are not white,” Brando said. “It just simply doesn’t apply, and we were simply the most rapacious, aggressive, destructive, torturing, monstrous people who swept from one coast to the other murdering and causing mayhem among the Indians.”Brando understood that the boos from his contemporaries were the sounds of powerful people who couldn’t stand having their industry and reality challenged. It was the sound of pure denial.But Brando was unapologetic about bursting the audience’s collective bubble.“They were booing because they thought, 'This moment is sacrosanct, and you're ruining our fantasy with this intrusion of reality. I suppose it was unkind of me to do that, but there was a larger issue, and it's an issue that no one in the motion picture industry has ever addressed themselves to, unless forced to,” Brando said.“The Godfather” star then expanded his thoughts on representation to include all people of color.“I don't think people realize what the motion picture industry has done to the American Indian, and a matter of fact, all ethnic groups. All minorities. All non-whites,” he said. “So when someone makes a protest of some kind and says, 'No, please don't present the Chinese this way.' ... On this network, you can see silly renditions of human behavior. The leering Filipino houseboy, the wily Japanese or the kook or the gook. The idiot Black man, the stupid Indian. It goes on and on and on, and people don't realize how deeply these people are injured by seeing themselves represented—not the adults, who are already inured to that kind of pain and pressure, but the children. Indian children, seeing Indians represented as savage, ugly, vicious, treacherous, drunken—they grow up only with a negative image of themselves, and it lasts a lifetime.”Hollywood is still far from ideal when it comes to being truly representative of America at large. But it is miles ahead of where it was in 1973 when the film industry, including some of its biggest stars, was outwardly hostile toward the idea of representation.In 1973, Marlon Brando was at the height of his power, which most would have relished, after a series of setbacks. But instead of taking the opportunity to bask in the spotlight, he spent a large portion of his star power capital to give voice to the people Hollywood had dehumanized for seven decades. This article originally appeared two years ago.
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
25 i

Optical illusion makes looking at Van Gogh's 'Starry Night' a truly 'moving' experience
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Optical illusion makes looking at Van Gogh's 'Starry Night' a truly 'moving' experience

Vincent Van Gogh's "The Starry Night" is one of the most recognizable and beloved paintings in the world. It was completed in 1889 and has been part of the permanent collection of the Museum of Modern Art in New York City since 1941. It is not up for sale, but if it were to go to auction there is a chance it could fetch as much as billion dollars. Such a priceless work of art is perhaps a strange object for a parlor trick, but trust me when I tell you this one is worth it. Whether they are oases in the desert created by heat shimmer, an elephant with an indeterminate number of legs or straight lines that look crooked, optical illusions can throw our brains for a loop. They can also be super fun, and an optical illusion that makes the "Starry Night" painting turn into a moving picture is most definitely fun.The illusion, shared by Alex Verbeek on Twitter, involves two steps. First, you stare at the center of a spinning spiral image for 20 seconds, then you look at the painting. Staring at the spinning spiral isn't as easy as it sounds—it makes your eyes buggy and your brain hurt a little—but even if you don't do the full 20 seconds, you can probably get the effect. Aim for staring at the center of the spiral for at least 10 seconds, then watch "The Starry Night" come to life before your eyes. (You have to click "play" first, by the way. The spirals need to be swirling.) \u201c\ud83c\udfa8 \n\nThe best way to see Van Gogh's "Starry Night" is to stare at the center of the spiral for 20 seconds and then look at the painting.\n\nRT when it works for you. \n\nhttps://t.co/SsEN8K0nSf\u201d — Alexander Verbeek \ud83c\udf0d (@Alexander Verbeek \ud83c\udf0d) 1663275946 Want a larger version of the painting to try it out on? Here you go:The effect doesn't last long, but phew. Our brains are so bizarre.According to a 2009 study by Japanese researchers, motion in optical illusions is still processed in the brain the same way real motion is. So don't be surprised if the moving painting makes you feel a bit woozy, if you're prone to motion sickness.It's hard to believe that Van Gogh's "Starry Night" could be improved upon, but here we are. Definitely a "moving" experience to share with your friends. This article originally appeared two years ago.
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
25 i ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
B*tchy View Host Claims Only Dumb White Idiots Voted For Trump
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
Showing 3236 out of 56665
  • 3232
  • 3233
  • 3234
  • 3235
  • 3236
  • 3237
  • 3238
  • 3239
  • 3240
  • 3241
  • 3242
  • 3243
  • 3244
  • 3245
  • 3246
  • 3247
  • 3248
  • 3249
  • 3250
  • 3251
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Rediger tilbud

Tilføj niveau








Vælg et billede
Slet dit niveau
Er du sikker på, at du vil slette dette niveau?

Anmeldelser

For at sælge dit indhold og dine indlæg, start med at oprette et par pakker. Indtægtsgenerering

Betal med tegnebog

Betalingsadvarsel

Du er ved at købe varerne, vil du fortsætte?

Anmod om tilbagebetaling