YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

BREAKING NEWS: Trump nominates Sean Duffy as Transportation secretary
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

BREAKING NEWS: Trump nominates Sean Duffy as Transportation secretary

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

How does Trump plan to cut government waste?
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

How does Trump plan to cut government waste?

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

Larry Kudlow: The country is in a joyous mood
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

Larry Kudlow: The country is in a joyous mood

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2hbmRFgiZ8
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2hbmRFgiZ8

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

BAD ADVICE': Psychiatrist slammed for controversial advice on Trump voters
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

BAD ADVICE': Psychiatrist slammed for controversial advice on Trump voters

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

Trump’s Silver Bullet
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Trump’s Silver Bullet

Politics Trump’s Silver Bullet  Increasing American energy production is the single most significant step the incoming administration can take toward delivering on its mandate. Credit: ded pixto/Shutterstock Two key aspects of President-elect Donald Trump’s decisive electoral mandate are leading a working- and middle-class economic recovery and cooling overheated global tensions with the United States’ strategic competitors. These two tasks, which the Biden administration treated as mutually exclusive, can both be addressed by the MAGA agenda’s silver bullet: fossil fuel extraction. Trump’s choices to lead the Interior and Energy Departments underscore the incoming administration’s commitment to a unified, pro-fossil-fuel energy strategy. At Energy, Trump has nominated Chris Wright, the CEO of Liberty Energy. Wright’s career has been defined by innovation in the energy sector. In 1992, he founded Pinnacle Technologies, pioneering the development of hydraulic fracturing technologies that were instrumental in advancing the commercial viability of shale gas production. Following Pinnacle’s sale in 2006, Wright reentered the energy market by founding Liberty Energy, which has since become a leading service provider for hydraulic fracturing operations. At Interior and at the helm of the newly created National Energy Council, North Dakota’s Governor Doug Burgum is set to take the reins. North Dakota ranks third in the nation—behind only Texas and New Mexico—in both crude oil production and proven reserves, making Burgum’s state a central player in America’s energy landscape. Burgum, who ran a presidential campaign with a near-exclusive focus on energy policy, brings a personal understanding of the energy industry and a proven track record of championing fossil fuels. His appointment to Interior signals a decisive shift in federal policy: opening federal lands for exploration and extraction. This move has the potential to significantly expand domestic production capacity, bolstering economic growth and energy security. Though these selections have garnered less press attention than Trump’s less conventional selections at other posts, Wright and Burgum’s appointments send a clear message to global markets and adversaries: The United States is back in business, and we intend to “drill, baby, drill!” The impacts of deregulatory, pro-production policies will quickly be felt both at home and abroad, allowing the Trump administration to deliver quick, substantive wins for the American people. Though the U.S. faces a myriad of crises, no single issue drove Americans to the polls more than the ongoing affordability crisis. Reckless Covid-era spending, coupled with Biden’s so-called Inflation Reduction Act, fueled a modest rise in core inflation but burdened American households with extraordinarily high consumer inflation. The Inflation Reduction Act, the “Green New Deal” in disguise, delivered entirely predictable results. Gasoline prices rose 37 percent from January 2020 to June 2024. Groceries increased by roughly 22 percent over the same period, electricity costs jumped 30 percent, and the median home sale price skyrocketed by 50 percent. While wages have risen modestly, American households have been unable to keep up with crushing cost increases, fueling record-breaking reliance on credit cards as citizens scrabble to make ends meet. Trump’s commitment to fossil fuel production, especially natural gas, will help alleviate costs on these hard-hit Americans who delivered his mandate. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that liquefied natural gas (LNG) accounts for 36 percent of American electricity generation, far surpassing crude oil, coal, and renewable competitors. By investing heavily in natural gas extraction and lowering its price, the Trump administration could potentially deliver billions in savings to strained American households and businesses, which would then pass those savings on to consumers. Electricity prices are closely tied to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Reducing electricity costs would directly alleviate financial burdens on American consumers. Trump’s bold commitment to cut consumer energy costs by 50 percent suggests his administration will incentivize a dramatic expansion of oil and gas production. The incoming administration’s commitment to expanding oil and gas production also aligns with one of Trump’s key promises: job creation. The natural gas sector already supports 3.4 million jobs, and increased natural gas production could add tens of thousands more in areas such as transportation, infrastructure development, and extraction. Energy-producing states like Texas, Pennsylvania, and Louisiana are poised to see significant economic benefits. Trump’s nomination of Burgum signals a focus on supporting crude oil-producing states like North Dakota while unlocking the production potential of states with large federal land reserves. New Mexico, Wyoming, and Alaska are likely to see substantial benefits to their state economies and workforce development as result of the shift in policy.  Perhaps most critical to the success of Trump’s rare non-consecutive second term will be his handling of the spiraling geopolitical crises triggered by the Biden Administration’s belligerent incompetence. Trump stands to inherit a house-on-fire situation in both Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The Biden administration’s adversaries, Russia and Iran, have leveraged high energy demand to fund their wars in eastern Ukraine and in the Levant, respectively. The Trump administration can undermine these petro-reliant states by supplying the world, increasing demand for American energy exports. Weakening Russia and Iran’s hands with American energy production, prior to negotiations, may prove one of Trump’s key points of leverage if he is to deliver substantive settlements.  Cleaning up Biden’s geopolitical failures won’t be the only strategic advantage of expanded oil and gas production. The incoming administration is rightly prioritizing Asia, recognizing China as America’s chief competitor. Asia accounts for nearly 70 percent of global LNG demand and 37 percent of global crude consumption, with China as the largest individual importer. Trump is sure to leverage American energy to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan or in the South China Sea. Japan and South Korea, key American allies for Trump’s containment strategy, are the second- and third-largest LNG importers in the region. Meeting their demand with affordable, emission-reducing energy serves to bolster allied economies and sovereignty. Affordable American energy exports also serve to undermine China’s strategy of using vast energy imports to consolidate influence over petro-states, including the Gulf States, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela.  The success of the once and future president in fulfilling his mandate will hinge largely on fossil fuel production, particularly natural gas. The administration’s ability to cut regulatory red tape, expand domestic production, and boost international exports will shape both the trajectory of the American economy and the nation’s international standing. If production thrives, so will America. If it falters, America’s position will weaken. With Wright and Burgum guiding the administration’s energy strategy, the president has taken a decisive step toward an energy boom and a renewal of American prosperity. The post Trump’s Silver Bullet appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

They’re Lying About Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

They’re Lying About Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Politics They’re Lying About Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Contrary to popular belief, the Kennedy scion is anything but a health extremist. (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images) If there’s one thing most Americans can agree on, it’s that most Americans are unhealthy. In 2024, more than 40 percent of Americans are overweight and nearly one in 10 are severely obese. The top four leading causes of death for Americans are heart disease, cancer, accidental injury, and stroke, three of which are exacerbated by poor diet and a sedentary lifestyle.   Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the incoming Secretary of Health and Human Services, agrees with most Americans. In an ad campaign released this fall, Kennedy stood in front of a table of Cheez-Its, Cap’n Crunch, and Doritos, carefully explaining how the Food and Drug Administration allows chemicals banned in other developed countries into the American food supply to cut costs. “A few people get very, very rich, and the toxins end up in every supermarket aisle,” Kennedy noted before expounding on the harmful properties in tartrazine, commonly known as Yellow 5 dye, which is found in many foods at American grocers. “Like the frog in slowly boiling water, we didn’t really notice as we got sicker and sicker,” Kennedy explained. “We’ve grown now to accept chronic disease conditions as normal. But now, we’re finally waking up to this cataclysm and we’re asking ourselves, ‘How in the world did this happen?’”  Ultraprocessed foods make up an estimated 73 percent of the American food supply. These foods have been found to reduce the bioavailability of vitamins and lead to metabolic syndrome, diabetes, angina, elevated blood pressure and reduction in biological age. Like Yellow 5, Red No. 3 is also commonly found in food products on the shelves of supermarkets throughout the United States. It has been nearly 35 years since the FDA banned the use of Red No. 3 in cosmetics after studies found it caused cancer in animals, yet the chemical still remains in the U.S. food supply while the agency continues to review the color additive used in food. Kennedy’s views on corn are non-debatable. He has advocated for less reliance on the subsidy which is used to feed cattle and to cheapen production costs for many of America’s most popular food items. Michael Pollan’s fantastic 2006 book The Omnivore’s Dilemma provides an extensive look at how corn has invaded the U.S. food supply. From the beverages we drink, to the foods we eat, America relies on corn to cut food costs and power trade. Ninety-five percent of animal feed in America is now made with corn which, Pollan notes, is the root cause of liver disease in cattle.  High-fructose corn syrup, which is linked to cardiovascular disease, has singularly replaced cane sugar in soft drinks over the last half century. The most popular soft drink companies in the country all use it as a cheap alternative to cane sugar. Type 2 diabetes, childhood obesity, and poor dental health are all linked to the substance which Americans consume at twice the recommended limit. And it’s not just in the foods and drinks we consume. Corn is also found in trash bags, charcoal, toothpaste, batteries, matches, and lining the shelves in supermarkets across America.  But Kennedy’s concerns about corn aren’t what’s making waves across the American media landscape. The real fears over Kennedy’s ascension to the top of America’s federal health institution have to do with pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines.  The talking heads at CNN were practically apoplectic the day after President-elect Donald Trump nominated Kennedy to lead the HHS. For them, Kennedy is not so much a threat to the health of Americans but a serious challenge to their advertisers.  Whether it’s Ozempic, or Wegovy, or Jardiance, or Mounjaro, on CNN any hour of the day every ad break is peppered with pitches by leading pharmaceutical companies that have little interest in addressing the root causes of obesity and diabetes. When the CNN host Kaitlin Collins recently read a tweet from Kennedy that promised to send FDA officials packing, her producers made sure not to highlight the section of his post which called for Americans to eat clean foods, get in the sun, and most importantly, exercise. There’s simply no money to be made off Americans getting off the couch and going for a walk in the sun. The pharmaceutical industry prefers our people sick so they can sell them pills. Kennedy is the first real challenge to the biggest game in town.  Kennedy’s outspoken views on vaccines are well documented. He has repeatedly questioned the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention schedule of immunization for children. During an appearance on the “Health Freedom for Humanity” podcast in 2021, he encouraged people to speak out against the over-vaccination of children.  “I see somebody on a hiking trail carrying a little baby and I say to him, ‘Better not get him vaccinated,’” Kennedy said. “If he hears it from 10 other people, maybe he won’t do it, you know, maybe he will save that child.” In the 1940s, American children were recommended the vaccines for smallpox, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. Today, American children are recommended 15 different immunizations, including the recently added vaccination against Covid-19. Though Kennedy’s skepticism of the immunization schedule is debated by experts, what can’t be debated is that American children are receiving more vaccines than ever before in US history.  With his cabinet appointment looming, Kennedy has attempted to moderate his message on vaccines. In an interview with NPR following Trump’s victory, Kennedy promised he won’t be nearly as radical as his critics claim. “If vaccines are working for somebody, I’m not going to take them away,” Kennedy told NPR. “People ought to have a choice and ought to be informed by the best information, so I’m going to make sure that scientific safety studies and efficacies are out there and people can make individual assessments about whether that product is going to be good for them.” Virologists have specifically targeted Kennedy’s belief that the unprecedented surge of autism rates in American children is connected to vaccines. In 1997, one in 2,500 children were diagnosed with autism. By 2017, that number had exploded to one in 68. Experts claim the surge is a result of a better understanding of the disease, but skeptics, including Kennedy, have suggested the rise is linked to the broader immunization schedule for American children. Kennedy has repeatedly claimed that “vaccines cause autism,” a statement that is debated and dismissed by leading virologists.  “I don’t think there’s any scientific question that vaccines cause autism,” Kennedy stated during a podcast appearance with Patrick Bet-David. Speaking with Jesse Watters in 2023, Kennedy repeated his claim. “I do believe that autism comes from vaccines, but I believe most of the things people believe about my opinions on vaccines are wrong. All I’ve said about vaccines is we should have good science. We should have the same kind of testing, placebo-controlled trials, that we have for every other medication.”  Despite his stated objections to the ballooning immunization schedule, Kennedy claims his interests lie less in the prohibition of vaccines and more in creating transparency for informed consent. It’s a concern that is echoed by a broad swath of the American public, especially Republicans. In 2019, Gallup found that more than 50 percent of Republican voters with children believed it was “extremely important” to vaccinate their children. By 2024, that number had nearly halved to 26 percent.  Vaccine skepticism didn’t appear out of nowhere. The Covid-19 pandemic put American vaccine policy front and center as businesses, government institutions, and educational centers mandated a rushed, faulty vaccine that was advertised as a magic bullet but failed to live up to the hype. If the medical and media institutions of America harbor frustrations with increased skepticism surrounding vaccine policy, they need not blame Kennedy.  Robert Redfield, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the first Trump administration, defended Kennedy’s nomination to head HHS on Sunday. “Kennedy is not antivaccine,” Redfield said. “What Kennedy is about is transparency about vaccines, honest discussion about vaccines, asking for the data to show that these vaccines are safe and they’re efficacious.” Those concerned that Kennedy’s appointment to lead America’s top health agency will usher in a wave of forced nutrition and government-prescribed dieting could rest a little easier Sunday after a picture posted this weekend aboard Trump’s plane showed Kennedy eating McDonald’s with the MAGA crew. Don Trump Jr. humorously captioned the image “Making America Healthy Again starts TOMORROW.”  For Americans, tomorrow can’t come soon enough.  The post They’re Lying About Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

Trump and the Storm of the Century
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Trump and the Storm of the Century

Foreign Affairs Trump and the Storm of the Century The U.S. is sleepwalking into disaster in the Middle East. Credit: saideex/Shutterstock The fear in many nations’ capitals is that President Donald Trump’s return to Washington might make Israel feel more confident in attacking Iran. According to Mike Evans, founder of the Friends of Zion Museum in Jerusalem, “There is no world leader Trump respects more than Netanyahu.”  The evangelical leader also confides that President Trump would support an Israeli attack before his inauguration on the assumption that the destruction of Iran’s oil production facilities would devastate Iran’s economy, inducing Iran to end the war with Israel before President Trump assumes his office. This thinking by no means excludes an Israeli decision to strike Iran’s nuclear development sites as well.  What Trump will or will not do is unknown. When the illusive stillness in the standoff between Tehran and Jerusalem will end is also unknown.  One thing is certain: If America joins Israel in its war against Iran, the outcome will be a geopolitical showdown that could dramatically alter the world as we know it. It is the storm of the 21st century and, for the moment, the American ship of state is sailing right into it. At a minimum, Trump should demand answers from his civilian and military advisors to four important questions. Question 1. What is the American purpose in waging war against Iran? Is Washington’s purpose to destroy the Iranian state? To destroy its capability to wage war against Israel? To eliminate Iran’s developing nuclear capability? Or to decapitate the Iranian state in the hope that the Iranian people will overthrow their national government?  All these goals demand serious study and analysis. In some cases, they overlap; in others they do not. The answers require identifying resources, manpower, capabilities, and the time needed to achieve these goals.  It is obvious that America’s air and naval forces will have to deliver powerful disabling strikes through dense Iranian air and missile defenses while potentially defending themselves and American military bases against attacks by Iranian and allied forces in the region. How long can these forces operate before their stocks of munitions are exhausted and their human and materiel losses are replaced?  Based on these answers, the stated objectives may or may not be attainable. National political and military leaders habitually plan and organize to achieve short, decisive outcomes, but wars always last longer than anticipated. Question 2. How will U.S. military power achieve the objectives?  What is the right mix of weapon systems and munitions? What targets promise effects that profoundly shape Iran’s ability to fight? In the aftermath of the Second World War, studies of bombing effectiveness revealed that the most important contribution air power made to Germany’s defeat was the destruction of Germany’s fuel production and the transportation network to move it. Its second-most important contribution was to cause German air forces to defend Germany’s cities and industries, thus stripping the German army of its close air support. But thousands of tons of bombs were still dropped on thousands of targets with minimal impact on the German war machine.  Can air and missile power alone compel the Iranian State to submit to Israeli and American demands? To date, no amount of precision-strike forces linked to space-based and terrestrial, persistent intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities has delivered victory in war. The Kosovo air campaign inflicted enormous damage on the Serbian economy, but its impact on Serbian ground forces was minimal. Yet once Moscow withdrew its promise of energy and food support to the Serbian people, the destruction of power plants and civilian and commercial infrastructure did induce the Serbian leadership to remove its forces from Kosovo.  Nevertheless, Serbian air defenses, despite their obsolete technology, were never degraded below 80 percent effectiveness. Precision strike has advanced in lethality and capability, but so has the military technology of the Iranian state. How far is unknown. In addition, it may turn out that air and missile attacks may prove incapable of halting the launch of tens of thousands of missiles, rockets and unmanned systems against Israel, as has been the case with Hezbollah.  Question 3. What is the desired end state? What does the President want Iran and the region that surrounds it to look like when the fighting ends?  This question is potentially the most difficult to answer. Unlike Iraq in 1991 and 2003 or Serbia in 1999 or Libya in 2011, Iran is not isolated. Iran has allies and supporters. By failing to define the end state in 1991, American operational strategic military planners were unprepared for the war’s outcome. The resulting peace was unsatisfactory to the long-term interests of the United States. The Russian Foreign Ministry recently announced that “negotiations on the strategic security partnership between Russia and Iran are ongoing… with a particular focus on military cooperation.” China’s President Xi Jinping has assured Iran of China’s support in the defense of Iranian national sovereignty and security. Even Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) advises against attacking Iran. During a recent summit of Arab and Muslim leaders, MBS stated, “The international community should oblige Israel to respect the sovereignty of the sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran and not to violate its lands.” Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are also making strategic financial moves. Saudi Arabia’s holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds have fluctuated significantly, falling to approximately $108.1 billion as of June 2023, a decline of over 41 percent since early 2020. If a conflict with Iran breaks out, the Saudis and Emirates will likely repatriate their wealth to the Arabian Peninsula and launch a “fire sale” of their U.S. treasuries, causing a financial crisis in the U.S. and the West on the scale of the Great Depression.  Less conspicuous, but no less important, is Turkey’s decision to break relations with Israel. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has also signaled that Turkish Forces are ready to launch operations in Northern Syria to destroy U.S.- and Israeli-backed Kurdish forces that threaten Turkish and Syrian security. Turkish forces could easily be committed to the defense of Lebanon or Egypt. Question 4. What is the strategic cost to the American people if Washington declines to participate in a regional war begun by Israel?  Since October 7, 2023, Israel’s political and military goals have extended far beyond the defense of Israeli national territory. Netanyahu seems confident that, with American financial aid and military support, Israeli forces can remove millions of Palestinian Arabs from Gaza and the West Bank, and Hezbollah from Southern Lebanon. Nevertheless, to secure Israel’s victory, PM Netanyahu insists that Iran and its proxies in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen must also be destroyed. What do Netanyahu’s goals mean for the health of the American economy and the stability of the international system? Can Israel survive without attacking its numerous enemies?  In 1956, President Dwight Eisenhower refused to risk war with the Soviet Union over Hungary’s revolution against Communism. In the same year, Eisenhower refused to support the Anglo-French-Israeli intervention to seize the Suez Canal. In 1968, President Lyndon Johnson refused to employ American military power to halt the Soviet military intervention reasserting control of Czechoslovakia. None of these decisions harmed American national interests. Eisenhower viewed the success of American Arms in the Second World War as the result of the carefully constructed grand strategy drawn by civilian leaders and executed by the senior leadership of the armed forces. Stanley Kubrick’s 1964 film, Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, not only lampooned the thinking prevalent in the 1960s about nuclear war, but demonstrated the breakdown of this important policy-making process. The film, starring Peter Sellers and George C. Scott, begins with a rogue Air Force general who orders nuclear-armed B-52 Bombers to attack targets inside the Soviet Union. Meanwhile, the president, who says he does not want to go down in history as a mass murderer, suddenly discovers that the Soviets created a doomsday machine consisting of cobalt bombs set to strike the continental United States if the Soviet Union is attacked. Eventually, all the bombers are recalled, except for one B-52 commanded by Major T.J. “King” Kong. Unaware of the recall order, “King” Kong completes his mission, yelling and waving his cowboy hat as he rides the bomb to his death. The outcome is nuclear Armageddon.  Hardly the stuff of comedy, but it is a cautionary tale. Any number of accidents or false flags could precipitate conflict in the Middle East, but Dr. Strangelove need not become a reality. In the words of the great coach Vince Lombardi, “The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.” It is up to Trump to use American power wisely. The post Trump and the Storm of the Century appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Survival Prepper
Survival Prepper  
32 w ·Youtube Prepping & Survival

YouTube
Sootch Nation Limited Edition USA Made T-Shirt Pre-Order by Dec 3rd
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
32 w

INVERTED WORLD ORDER! It's the REPUBLICANS Who Are Bgringing in the NWO With A.I. Governance Rebel C
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

INVERTED WORLD ORDER! It's the REPUBLICANS Who Are Bgringing in the NWO With A.I. Governance Rebel C

INVERTED WORLD ORDER! It's the REPUBLICANS Who Are Bgringing in the NWO With A.I. Governance Rebel Call - 7,233 views November 18, 2024 Rebel Call - Nations Conspire - FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES Mirrored From: https://www.youtube.com/@nationsconspire
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 3361 out of 56666
  • 3357
  • 3358
  • 3359
  • 3360
  • 3361
  • 3362
  • 3363
  • 3364
  • 3365
  • 3366
  • 3367
  • 3368
  • 3369
  • 3370
  • 3371
  • 3372
  • 3373
  • 3374
  • 3375
  • 3376

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund