The worst performance by a Democrat in the Big Apple since 1992

'Rampant sexual abuse of young people in the fashion industry'

'You’re not going to have a change for at least a decade'

The West Coast is most glaring

Attack ad blitz

Mobile networks have been the backbone of connectivity, evolving from 1G to the advanced 5G networks we rely on today. This rapid evolution has transformed our communication methods and redefined consumer experiences and business operations. With 5G’s introduction, we’re witnessing unprecedented speeds and reliability, setting the stage for even more innovative developments. This article explores […]

'When Republicans have the resources to tell this story, we win'

The Golden Age of Hollywood is one that will never be forgotten, with the likes of legendary actors James Dean, Elizabeth Taylor, John Wayne, and Grace Kelly – to name a few. Classic Hollywood cinema spanned multiple genres from epic Westerns like The Searchers to film noir thrillers like Rear Window. Despite a stark difference in quality and acting style that are characteristic of the era... Source

The 2024 presidential campaign is ending pretty much where it began: loathing the never-ending presence of Donald Trump. On the day before the election, The New York Times’ front page displayed a gaudy editorial (badly disguised as “News Analysis”) under the title “Torrent of Lies Redefines Political Norms.” Doesn’t that sound like a hard-charging rerun of 2016? Nothing ever seems to change from the paper that gaudily proclaimed under Trump that “The Truth Is More Important Now Than Ever.” You can point and laugh, since The New York Times refused to admit that Hunter Biden’s laptop full of corruption details was authentic until 2022, and then it acknowledged reality in a story on page A-20, in paragraph 23. It was buried, almost like an unmarked grave. Chief White House correspondent Peter Baker’s editorial bubbled over with contempt for how many lies Trump told in the first 300 seconds of an interview with Tucker Carlson on Halloween. “Public appearances by Mr. Trump throughout this year’s campaign have been an Alice-in-Wonderland trip through the political looking glass, a journey into an alternate reality often belied by actual reality.” Baker thinks it’s amusing that Trump will sell his administration as the greatest ever seen in American history. Baker can’t imagine anyone thinks he and his journalist wife Susan Glasser and his journalist friends sound like the exact opposite. They have sold Trump’s administration as the most horrendous years America has ever seen.  Every American who pays even a moment’s attention to American politics knows that Trump exaggerates wildly and egotistically, selling himself like he’s closing another real estate deal. Everything is the best or the worst ever. Everyone loads that into their political calculus. But Democrat-coddling journalists act perpetually shocked, like they’re all starring in “50 First Dates” and forget every night how Trump operates. What’s really shocking here is how the major media pretend that the Democrats are dramatically more honest, like 10 times more honest. Set apart on page A-16 is their New York Times analysis of candidate speeches: 64 is the number of false or misleading statements at a typical Trump rally, according to them. By contrast, six is the number of false or misleading statements at a typical rally for Kamala Harris. The obvious joke is that Trump’s rally speeches can go on for 90 minutes, while Harris is closing out the campaign with 10-minute speeches. So, what’s the minute-by-minute falsehood rate? Under these stilted numbers is “33%”—as in the percentage of registered voters who agree with Trump’s false claims that Joe Biden “did not legitimately win.” The Times can’t acknowledge that this fraction of voters who believe dramatic media suppression of Biden scandal news can translate into “illegitimate” victory. You can accept the result and yet protest the unfair process. Then the partisanship is underlined by their selected expert. “No one in American politics has ever lied on this scale,” said Bill Adair, a founder of PolitiFact whose new book is titled “Beyond the Big Lie.” The Times left out Adair’s partisan subtitle: “The Epidemic of Political Lying, Why Republicans Do It More, and How It Could Burn Down Our Democracy.” Republicans could “burn down our democracy” since they lie so much more, maybe 10 times more. Adair is quite candid about how he thinks the Republicans were aggressive liars before Trump, so put the Democrat donkey ears on his head. Republicans refuse to accept the “norm” that political news must be dominated by people who want the Republicans disparaged and then destroyed—as they identify themselves as nonpartisan truth-tellers. That’s a very large and egotistical lie. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post The Media Are Egotistical Exaggerators and Liars appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Election Day wasn’t the only item on President-elect Donald Trump’s calendar in November. The once and future president has a date Nov. 26 with a New York judge for his sentencing hearing. One day after the election, the Justice Department reportedly determined that special counsel Jack Smith’s investigations—of Trump’s contesting the results of the 2020 election and of the classified documents case—should be dropped because it’s department policy not to prosecute a sitting president.  Both Fox News and MSNBC reported the termination of  Smith’s cases. Meanwhile, a criminal case in Georgia is pending albeit troubled.  The new Trump administration’s Justice Department likely could dismiss federal charges against him, but that leaves state charges in place.  “Plenary authority of the president, with respect to the pardon power, affects federal cases,” said Charles “Cully” Stimson, a former assistant U.S. attorney in the District of Columbia and co-author of the book “Rogue Prosecutors.”  “It does not affect state cases because, of course, we live in a republic and we have 50 sovereign states where the police power resides,” Stimson said. “So it does not affect the state cases.”  “For all intents and purposes, his legal problems, although not over, are about to be sent to the dustbin of history,” Stimson, deputy director of the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal.  Among the progressive prosecutors elected with the support of nonprofit organizations backed by billionaire George Soros is Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. The Democrat won Trump’s conviction in May on 34 counts of fraud involving money paid to porn star Stormy Daniels to keep her quiet about a tryst with Trump. “Alvin Bragg can read English. He sees of course now the sixth high-profile Soros rogue prosecutor, [Los Angeles County District Attorney] George Gascon, lost in his race,” Stimson said.  “Alvin Bragg is not stupid. The case was on thin ice to begin with,” he said. “So, I’m sure people around him will either advise him it would be prudent not to even move forward.” However, Stimson said, anti-Trump motives might drive Bragg to keep the case alive.  “A more practical approach, if he were reasonable—and of course he has shown himself not to be reasonable—is to withdraw the case and dismiss it with prejudice now,” Stimson said. “But he won’t do that. That’s not the way these people are wired. Trump derangement syndrome will live in some segments of society. Whether Alvin Bragg wakes up and smells the coffee remains to be seen.” Bragg’s office did not respond to phone and email inquiries from The Daily Signal for this story.  New York Judge Juan Merchan, who oversaw the Manhattan trial, scheduled the sentencing hearing for Nov. 26 after Trump’s lawyers twice pushed for a delay—and they could argue for more delays.  Stimson said it’s possible that Merchan will decide on how the U.S. Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling affects the Manhattan case.  In Georgia, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis secured a RICO indictment against Trump for challenging the 2020 election result in Georgia, which Joe Biden won on the way to the presidency. RICO is an acronym for Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations. “The Fani Willis case will die on the vine of its own weight,” Stimson predicted.  Defense lawyers in the case brought a complaint against the prosecution after discovering that Willis had a romantic relationship with a lawyer she hired to handle the Trump case. They alleged that Willis benefited through vacation trips with him. Willis and the special prosecutor she hired, Nathan Wade, denied wrongdoing.   The Fulton County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to inquiries from The Daily Signal for this story.  Georgia has an independent State Board of Pardons and Paroles, which makes clemency decisions. But New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, has the authority to issue pardons or commutations.  Hochul’s office did not respond to phone and email inquiries from The Daily Signal.  On Wednesday afternoon, though Hochul and New York state Attorney General Letitia James both spoke about plans to combat the incoming Trump administration.  Hochul made mention of immunity.  “New York has been a bastion of freedom and rule of law,” Hochul said.  She then said, addressing Trump: “If you try to harm New Yorkers or roll back our rights, I will fight you every step of the way.” James, who brought a successful state $450 million civil fraud lawsuit against Trump, later followed with a warning for Trump.  “As attorney general for the great state of New York, my job is to protect and defend the rights of New Yorkers and the rule of law,” James, also a Democrat, said Wednesday. “I will not shrink from this responsibility.” The post Trump Is President-Elect. So What Happens to Those Indictments? appeared first on The Daily Signal.