Perhaps the greatest tool astronomers have is the ability to look backward in time. Since starlight takes time to reach us, astronomers can observe the history of the cosmos by capturing the light of distant galaxies. This is why observatories such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) are so useful. With it, we can study in detail how galaxies formed and evolved. We are now at the point where our observations allow us to confirm long-standing galactic models, as a recent study shows. This particular model concerns how galaxies become chemically enriched. In the early universe, there was mostly just hydrogen and helium, so the first stars were massive creatures with no planets. They died quickly and spewed heavier elements, from which more complex stars and planets could form. Each generation adds more elements to the mix. But as a galaxy nurtures a menagerie of stars from blue supergiants to red dwarfs, which stars play the greatest role in chemical enrichment? One model argues that it is the most massive stars. This makes sense because giant stars explode as supernovae when they die. They toss their enriched outer layers deep into space, allowing the material to mix within great molecular clouds from which new stars can form. But about 20 years ago, another model argued that smaller, more sunlike stars played a greater role. The Cat’s Eye nebula is a remnant of an AGB star. Credit: ESA, NASA, HEIC and the Hubble Heritage Team, STScI/AURA Stars like the Sun don’t die in powerful explosions. Billions of years from now, the Sun will swell into a red giant star. In a desperate attempt to keep burning, the core of a sun-like star heats up significantly to fuse helium, and its diffuse outer layers swell. On the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, they are known as asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. While each AGB star might toss less material into interstellar space, they are far more common than giant stars. So, the model argues, AGB stars play a greater role in the enrichment of galaxies. Both models have their strengths, but proving the AGB model over the giant star model would prove difficult. It’s easy to observe supernovae in galaxies billions of light years away. Not so much with AGB stars. Thanks to the JWST, we can now test the AGB model. Using JWST the study looked at the spectra of three young galaxies. Since the Webb’s NIRSpec camera can capture high-resolution infrared spectra, the team could see not just the presence of certain elements but their relative abundance. They found a strong presence of carbon and oxygen bands, which is common for AGB remnants, but also the presence of more rare elements such as vanadium and zirconium. Taken altogether, this points to a type of AGB star known as thermally pulsing AGBs, or TP-AGBs. Many red giant stars enter a pulsing phase at the end of their lives. The hot core swells the outer layers, things cool down a bit, and gravity compresses the star a bit, which heats the core, and the whole process starts over. This study indicates that TP-AGBs are particularly efficient at enriching galaxies, thus confirming the 20-year-old model. Reference: Lu, Shiying, et al. “Strong spectral features from asymptotic giant branch stars in distant quiescent galaxies.” Nature Astronomy (2024): 1-13. The post Webb Confirms a Longstanding Galaxy Model appeared first on Universe Today.

Politics Can Democratic House Candidates Run Away From Harris? The fate of the lower chamber seems to depend on the up-ballot race. Credit: image via Shutterstock All eyes are on the top of the ticket. The former President Donald Trump is looking to do what only one president has done before: return to the White House after spending four years in the wilderness. The polls have Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris locked in a dead heat. For both Trump and Harris, however, making a lasting impact in the first two years of their respective administrations hinges on down-ballot races, particularly those that will determine which party controls the House of Representatives. Certainly, taking back the Senate in 2024 remains vital to the success of a second Trump administration. But with an almost guaranteed victory for Gov. Jim Justice in West Virginia to make the Senate 50–50, Republicans need to only take one more seat from Democrats across a map that heavily advantages the GOP. Republican senate candidates in Montana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, and Nevada all stand a fighting chance to flip a Democratic Senate seat. According to 538’s simulations, Republicans take the upper chamber in 90 of 100 simulations. It’s the House that remains much more up for grabs—especially as Republicans won the popular vote in the 2022 midterms by a much larger margin than their current slim majority would suggest. 538’s model has Republicans maintaining control of the House in 53 out of 100 simulations. And while the betting markets currently give Trump and Senate Republicans major edges over their Democratic counterparts, Polymarket currently has Republicans with only a 54 percent chance of carrying the House. The Cook Political Report currently identifies 22 toss-up races in the House, split almost evenly between Democrats and Republicans, with 10 Democrats and 12 Republicans defending these seats.  Five of those 12 Republican seats are scattered across Harris’s home state of California, from Orange County to the Central Valley. In Orange County, for example, Rep. Michelle Steel is hoping to keep the 45th District from Democratic challenger Derek Tran. Although Cook has the district as a D+2, Steel won her first election in that district by just over 5 points. Three of the 12 seats Republicans are hoping to hold are in swing states—two in Arizona and one in Pennsylvania. The Keystone State’s Rep. Scott Perry, the former chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, is trying to stave off a challenge from Janelle Stelson, a former TV news anchor. While Perry came to Washington in 2019, Republicans had held PA-10 since 2010. Stelson has publicly run away from the Biden-Harris administration’s record, but reports suggest that Stelson and Harris’s campaign are working arm in arm on the ground. Stelson is far from the only Democratic House candidate distancing themselves from the Biden-Harris administration—several of which Cook identifies as toss-ups Democrats are trying to defend. In Maine, Rep. Jared Golden has abstained from endorsing Harris. Golden, who flipped the seat in the 2022 midterms, faces Austin Theriault, a Republican member of the Maine House of Representatives in the R+6 Maine’s Second District. Golden was one of only three Democrats to vote in favor of House Speaker Mike Johnson’s plan to pass the SAVE Act (which prohibits illegal immigrants from voting in federal elections) attached to the continuing resolution. The other two Democrats who voted for Johnson’s plan, Reps. Don Davis and Mary Peltola, are among Democrats facing tough challenges. Davis is defending his seat in North Carolina’s First District, which is R+1, from retired Army colonel Laurie Buckhout. Davis has raised the most money out of any Democratic House candidate in the Tarheel state. Peltola, Alaska’s at-large representative, faces an R+8 disadvantage. She came to office in 2022 after Republican infighting, and the ranked-choice voting system unexpectedly propelled her to victory. It was weird in 2022, and it’s weird in 2024. While the Republican challenger Nick Begich remains the favorite, Alaskan Independence Party candidate John Wayne Howe could still play spoiler. Now, Peltola’s campaign apparatus is running ads in favor of Howe over Begich. As November 5 nears, the House appears likely to be determined by whether Democratic House candidates can run faster away from Harris than House Republican candidates can run towards Trump. And that doesn’t seem to bode well for Harris’s presidential aspirations. The post Can Democratic House Candidates Run Away From Harris? appeared first on The American Conservative.

Liberals Turn On Legacy Media For Lying About Trump’s Liz Cheney Comments [WATCH]

All five answers to the questions below have something in common. Can you figure it out?

A strange connection. The post The one musician Jimmy Page called their own “genre” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

A talented singer also admired by John Lennon. The post “Madly in love”: The singer George Harrison called his favourite first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

"Just completely outrageous". The post The four bands who helped to set up punk, according to Pete Townshend first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

"The classic of the century". The post The critically acclaimed greatest album of all time, according to science first appeared on Far Out Magazine.