Chinese hackers recently targeted the phones of Donald Trump and JD Vance. The FBI and other officials had previously confirmed that Iran hacked Trump’s campaign. Three Iranians were charged with that crime. The hackers sent information to Biden’s team. Some of it was leaked, and the only person it helped was Harris. Politico, The New […] The post Chinese Hackers Target Donald Trump’s and JD Vance’s Phones appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Actress Gina Carano took the stage in Las Vegas to talk to supporters of former President Donald Trump and explained why it’s important to “speak even if your voice shakes.” During the Turning Point Action rally on Thursday for Trump, Carano started out her speech pointing to celebrities who say they will leave the country if Trump wins the election and said, regardless of who wins on November 5, she will stay and fight for America. She said she suspects those celebrities will end up leaving the country, too, if Vice President Kamala Harris wins, once the Democrats have “installed a government” that “seeks to destroy us.” “I’m an actress who got my start professional fighting right here in your mixed martial arts gyms in Las Vegas. … I’d rather be being punched in the face than giving a speech right now, but I’m doing this for America,’ Carano said. “I’m doing this because this election is so important, it’s so valuable,” she added. “I didn’t actually start voting until 2020, and I realized that, my gosh, there was such a prejudice here. I was voting for who I thought was the best candidate, and that was Donald Trump, and that still is Donald Trump.” MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 “I was targeted, discriminated against, shamed, and fired from one of the most powerful entertainment companies in the world [Disney],” Carano continued. “They fired me at the height of my career. … I mean, they’ve gone out of the way to make an example out of me. But I think by the grace of God, he’s helping me make an example out of them. I’m currently suing Disney with Elon Musk’s and X’s backing.”   View this post on Instagram   A post shared by G I N A J?Y C A R A N O (@ginajcarano) Later, she called on Trump supporters in Nevada to get out and vote and make the election an “overwhelming majority vote for Donald Trump.” “I want to encourage you to never give up,” the actress explained. “Cast your vote. This is our first and most important step toward saving America. It is the healthiest act. It is the right thing to do so we do not look back and say we didn’t go through the motions of the best possible outcome.” “Don’t get cocky — we’ve seen how easily votes can change in the middle of election night,” she added. “Make this election overwhelmingly obvious. I truly hope this is the start of the great awakening.” Later, in a post on Instagram, Carano wrote about “electric night” and said, “Speak even if your voice shakes…Thank you for the beautiful reception today. All my love! Keep voting, don’t let up. Make it overwhelming. The time is now. Glory to God.” The star of the DailyWire+ film “Terror on the Prairie” filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against Disney and Luscasfilm after she was fired from the “Star Wars” spinoff series “The Mandalorian” over what it deemed “offensive” social media posts. The trial is scheduled to begin on September 29, 2025. Related: Gina Carano Celebrates After Disney Loses Effort To Stall Her Suit

Israel has started its long-expected military response to Iran’s missile barrage at the start of the month as massive explosions have been seen and felt throughout Iran’s capital city of Tehran and nearby Karaj. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced the strikes against Iranian military targets in a statement, saying that they were in direct response to the “months of continuous attacks from the regime in Iran against the State of Israel.” “The regime in Iran and its proxies in the region have been relentlessly attacking Israel since October 7th – on seven fronts – including direct attacks from Iranian soil,” the statement added. “Like every other sovereign country in the world, the State of Israel has the right and the duty to respond. Our defensive and offensive capabilities are fully mobilized. We will do whatever necessary to defend the State of Israel and the people of Israel.” The airstrikes appear to have hit multiple locations throughout Tehran, including the eastern, western, and southern parts of the city, according to The New York Times. In the east, there are military bases and secretive military sites, and in the west is the headquarters for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the report said. The Times added that explosions also were happening near Imam Khomeini international airport, which is in the southern part of the city. The strikes come in response to the Islamic regime firing approximately 180 ballistic missiles into Israel at the start of the month, which sent the entire country running for bomb shelters. Current and former Israeli officials had said for weeks that the country’s response to Iran would include a significant military response that would be deadly. Israel reportedly told Iran prior to their ballistic attack that if any missiles hit Israeli territory — regardless of whether anyone was hurt or there was damage to any infrastructure — Israel would respond by targeting sensitive facilities inside Iran. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 Iran launched the missile attack on Israel in response to Israel terminating the leaders of two Iranian-backed terrorist organizations, Hezbollah’s Hassan Nasrallah and Hamas’ Ismail Haniyeh. Nasrallah was killed in an airstrike in southern Lebanon at the end of September after a year of Hezbollah firing thousands of missiles, rockets, and drones into Israel, which displaced tens of thousands of civilians. Haniyeh was killed at the end of July in Tehran by a bomb that was planted inside his room at an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) facility where he was staying. Israel has decimated both Islamic terrorist groups over the last year following Hamas’ unprecedented October 7 terrorist attack in which 1,200 people were murdered inside Israel, 5,000+ were injured, and hundreds were taken hostage. Israel also killed Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar in southern Gaza last week when a tank opened fire on a structure that the terrorist was hiding in. Recent intelligence released by Israeli officials showed that Iran knew about Hamas’ October 7 terrorist attack at least several months before it was executed. The New York Times obtained minutes of 10 secret meetings that Hamas held that included Sinwar and his top commanders. The Israeli military discovered the documents on a computer in January 2024 as they searched an underground command center in Khan Younis. “Members of and experts close to Hamas” confirmed to the Times that the documents were legitimate and authentic, the report said. The Washington Post reported that other documents from Hamas showed that the terrorist group had even deadlier plans for its attack on Israel. Hamas’ plans were based on more than 17,000 photographs of Israel that were taken from satellites, drones, and social media postings. Hamas planned attacks at additional Israeli military facilities, Ben Gurion International Airport, a 70-story skyscraper, and “the Azrieli Center complex which comprises three skyscrapers, a large shopping mall, train station and cinema.” The terrorist group searched for ways to destroy the skyscraper, hoping to replicate, on a smaller scale, Al-Qaeda’s September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the U.S. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has publicly claimed that Iran had nothing to do with the attack and was not aware of its planing. However, documents obtained by the various publications also debunk this false claim. It has already been established that hundreds of Hamas terrorists received “specialized combat training” inside Iran from the country’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF) in the months leading up to October 7. Iran sent Hamas at least $10 million, the documents state. But Sinwar wanted more and launched a “vigorous appeal” directly to Khamenei, requesting $500 million over the course of two years and training for 12,000 Hamas terrorists. “Iran trained Hamas and encouraged them to do exactly the things they did on Oct. 7,” said Farzin Nadimi, an Iran expert and senior fellow with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “Their goal was to get to the core of the Israeli state and crush it.” Hamas was ready to carry out the attack in July 2022, but decided to postpone it. The documents do not state why the attack was postponed, but based on details included in the notes, it is believed to be because they were trying to enlist support from Hezbollah and Iran. However, the terrorist group did not want to wait too long to launch the attack because Israel was on the verge of deploying a new laser defense weapon to shoot down rockets and missiles, the report said. Sinwar’s deputy, Khalil al-Hayya, discussed the attack in the summer of 2023 with senior IRGC commander Mohammed Said Izadi and asked for Iran’s help with striking sensitive Israeli military sites within the “first hour” of the attack, the report said. Izadi said that Iran supported the plan, but needed time “to prepare the environment.” While Iran did not conduct military strikes against Israel that day, it is not known, at least publicly, whether they provided any kind of logistical, surveillance, or other type of assistance to fulfill Hamas’ request for support during the first hour of the attack. It is clear, however, that Iran knew about the attack well in advance of the massacre. The Wall Street Journal reported that some of the documents dated back to 2019, when Qassem Soleimani was still the head of the IRGC-QF. Soleimani told Hamas that they had few allies in the region and that even Turkey, which likes Hamas, couldn’t provide “a single bullet” to the terror group. “The reality,” Soleimani said, “is that there is no one but Iran.” This is a breaking news story; refresh the page for updates. 

Alec Baldwin has won another victory in court after a New Mexico judge denied the state’s motion in the “Rust” case to reconsider the dismissal of the involuntary manslaughter charge against him. On Thursday, New Mexico Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer filed her judgment that the prosecutors’ arguments have already been presented and said they provided nothing new that would warrant reconsidering her prior decision to dismiss the charges against Baldwin, the Associated Press reported. “Because the state’s amended motion raises arguments previously made, and arguments that the state elected not to raise earlier, the court does not find the amended motion well taken,” the judge wrote, adding that the request was also untimely (outside the time frame for appeal). Earlier this year, Baldwin was charged with involuntary manslaughter. He faced up to 18 months in prison, as previously reported. However, the charges were dismissed on the third day of his trial in July, with the judge ruling prosecution hid evidence from the defense. A judge on Friday refused to reopen the manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin, standing by her earlier decision to throw out the charge due to withheld evidence.https://t.co/q0WIdAZK3A — Variety (@Variety) October 25, 2024 The charges stem from an incident on the New Mexico film set of Baldwin’s movie “Rust,” on October 21, 2021, when Baldwin began filming a scene and the gun he was holding fired a live round that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and injured the film’s director, Joel Souza. Baldwin repeatedly maintained that there was “no trigger pull.” Following the decision Thursday, the special prosecutor in the case, Kari Morrissey, told the AP she would be appealing the latest ruling, disagreeing with the judge. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 In January, a grand jury indicted the “Saturday Night Live” star for involuntary manslaughter. Two special prosecutors, Morrissey and Jason Lewis, presented their case to the grand jury after receiving further analysis about the gun used, Variety noted. Baldwin’s attorneys, Luke Nikas and Alex Spiro, released a statement at the time that said, “We look forward to our day in court.” In January 2023, the Santa Fe County District Attorney’s Office charged Baldwin with two counts of involuntary manslaughter following Hutchins’ death. The charges were dismissed without prejudice in April after the actor’s legal team claimed the gun had been modified in some way which caused it to malfunction, the Associated Press noted. Prosecutors made clear at the time, “This decision does not absolve Mr. Baldwin of criminal culpability and charges may be refiled.” In April, the film’s weapons supervisor, 26-year-old Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, was sentenced to 18 months in prison after she was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the fatal shooting of Hutchins. In September, Sommer rejected Gutierrez-Reed’s request to dismiss her conviction or have a new trial following the dismissal of charges against Baldwin, the AP noted. Related: Judge Dismisses Criminal Case Against Alec Baldwin After Prosecutors Hid Evidence

Consider this a Public Service Announcement for Team Harris/Walz. The Democratic ticket is struggling to coax men to vote Democrat on November 5. All the farcical hunting trips and faux-tough rockers can’t sell half the population on Vice President Kamala Harris. And let’s not get started on that macho men for Harris ad. John Wayne never crossed his legs the way that one actor does in the spot. The Democrats would be better off watching the following movies to get pointers on Manhood 101. “Shane” (1953) Hulton Archive/Getty Images It’s OK to tear up during the Western’s final moments. Honest. Up until then, director George Stevens’ film showcases why masculinity matters. Alan Ladd plays the title character, a retired gunslinger who decides to help ranchers at the mercy of a local thug. Shane wants to put killing behind him, but getting to know the Starrett clan changes those plans. Decent people deserve someone who can protect them. Their survival comes first. Shane memorably teaches young Joey Starrett (Brandon deWilde) how to use a gun and wrestles a massive tree trunk with the Starrett patriarch in another iconic scene. He even feels a romantic tug for Mrs. Starrett (Jean Arthur) but knows not to break up their nuclear family. The final gunfight remains a thing of beauty all these years later, a testament to cool under fire. “Jaws” (1975) English actor Robert Shaw (1927 – 1978) as Quint, viewed through a set of shark jaws, in a publicity still for ‘Jaws’, directed by Steven Spielberg, 1975. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images) The ultimate shark thriller doubles as a treatise on masculinity. The three male characters capture the shades of the modern man. Roy Scheider’s Sheriff Brody is a calm, cool and committed leader. He also knows when he’s out of his depth. He pushes past his fear of the water to stop a shark from snacking on more Amity beach dwellers. Quint, memorably played by Robert Shaw, is the ultimate Alpha Male. Richard Dreyfuss’s scholarly Matt Hooper looks like a “Revenge of the Nerds” castoff, but he proves his mettle when it counts. He’s also not afraid to show fear in the face of what seems like insurmountable odds. One of the film’s best lines? Hooper struggles to clean his diving mask seconds before he descends into the steel cage for an up close and personal look at the shark. “I’ve got no spit,” he confesses, capturing both fear and resilience. He’s still going down to confront the shark. That’s what a man does. “Rocky” (1976) Sylvester Stallone, Carl Weathers, Lou Fillipo and Burgess Meredith in “Rocky” 1976. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios. Rocky Balboa could have lived down to everyone’s expectations. Sylvester Stallone’s character wasn’t bright, nor was he born with anything resembling a silver spoon in his mouth. He was a journeyman fighter granted a chance to make something of himself. That’s assuming he can last a few rounds with the great Apollo Creed (Carl Weathers). Stay down, Rocky. No one expects you to win. Rocky won’t quit. He screws up his courage, trains harder than he’s ever trained before and manages to woo a shy pet shop clerk named Adrian (Talia Shire) along the way. “Ain’t gonna be no rematch,” Creed grunts late in the fight, knowing Rocky will never quit. There’s a reason Stallone remains a star at 78. Fans love his aspirational characters, none more than the Italian Stallion. Rocky represents a puncher’s chance, the notion that anyone in America can corral their destiny with hard work, hustle and an indomitable spirit. “Predator” (1987) Arnold Schwarzenegger, Shane Black, Jesse Ventura, Carl Weathers, Bill Duke, Richard Chaves, Sonny Landham. “Predator”. 1987. 20th Century Fox. Lawrence Gordon Productions. Silver Pictures. Photo by Sunset Boulevard/Corbis via Getty Images You may never see more unchecked testosterone in a feature film. Arnold Schwarzenegger leads this manly ensemble, a war picture that takes a Sci-Fi turn when the title creatures appears. Co-stars Jesse Ventura, Bill Duke, Carl Weathers and Sonny Landham tear down half the jungle trying to swat their invisible foe. Only Schwarzenegger’s character lives long enough for the battle royale. Muscle. Sweat. Blood. It’s the perfect ‘80s action movie in a decade loaded with over-the-top male heroes. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 “Die Hard” (1988) Bruce Willis as John McClane in “Die Hard.” 20th Century Fox. Gordon Company. Silver Pictures. 1988. Sure, it’s a Christmas movie, but beneath the yuletide tinsel lies a tribute to a father and husband. Det. John McClane (Bruce Willis) gets the worst Christmas present possible – a gang of Eurotrash thieves overtakes Nakatomi Plaza on December 24. McClane’s ex (Bonnie Bedelia) is among the hostages, and he’ll stop at nothing to save her. He’ll walk barefoot over broken glass and stare down one of Hollywood’s most memorable villains, Hans Gruber (Alan Rickman). He’s got the heart of a champion, showcased in four increasingly diminished sequels. He also knows when it’s best to use a wisecrack to keep the enemy off balance. Willis lacked the cartoonish physique of Stallone and Schwarzenegger, the ‘80s defining action stars. He made do with a wife-beater T-shirt and a never-say-die spirit. “Road House” (1989) “Be nice. If he won’t walk, walk him. But be nice.” Patrick Swayze’s James Dalton can crack skulls with the best of him. The bouncer would rather de-escalate a bar fight than pour gasoline on its flames. Masculinity can evoke restraint, too. Dalton could take on a roomful of drunks, but being a man means knowing when violence is the very last resort. Being a man also means treating a lady right. Dalton proves he’s aces on that front, too, while courting his lovely physician (Kelly Lynch). * * * Christian Toto is an award-winning journalist, movie critic and editor of HollywoodInToto.com. He previously served as associate editor with Breitbart News’ Big Hollywood. Follow him at @HollywoodInToto. The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

'Lawler maintains a slight lead over former Democratic Rep. Mondaire Jones'

Arab media reported that the strikes may have targeted the headquarters of IRGC

'We reverse the district court’s contrary judgment'

Was it just a coincidence that Vice President Kamala Harris showed up, 15 minutes late, to be interviewed by Fox News anchor Bret Baier a day before Nate Silver’s poll aggregation website showed her chances of winning the election slipping below 50%? Probably not. What may link Harris’ slide in the polls and her tardy appearance for an interview in which she served up word salads to Baier’s questions on illegal immigration and inflation and then segued, sometimes awkwardly, to denunciations of former President Donald Trump? October hasn’t been a good month for Harris or her party. Nor has it been an entirely bad one. Silver’s model still gives her a 47% chance of winning, much higher than Trump’s 29% on election eve 2016. But it’s perceptibly below her 57% chance Sept. 27, which reflected poll results after the Sept. 10 debate. “Since then,” Silver writes, “the race has slightly drifted away from her.” Slightly but perceptibly. Silver’s model gives reduced weight to polls conducted as long as six weeks ago. Another way of looking at the trend is to take a raw average of all polls conducted over a month. That method shows Harris leading Trump nationally by 3.6% in September and 1.7% in October. The RealClearPolitics average, which includes only polls conducted starting Oct. 9, puts Harris’ lead lower, at 0.8%. A Harris popular vote plurality of less than 2%, Silver estimates, has only a 16% chance of producing a Harris electoral vote majority. Poll averages in this year’s seven target states show something similar. September polling had Harris ahead in four of the seven states. October polling showed her leading in one, with Trump ahead in four and tied in two. The 34 target-state polls listed by RealClearPolitics conducted primarily or totally since Oct. 9 show Trump ahead in all seven states, by an average of 48.5% to 47%. There have been similar shifts below the presidential level. In RCP’s generic vote for the House of Representatives, Democrats’ lead was cut in half, from 1.8% on Sept. 30 to 0.9% now. That’s been consistent in past years with Republicans winning a majority of House seats. In Senate races, Republicans seem to have captured two Democratic seats—in Montana, where challenger Tim Sheehy has led three-term incumbent Jon Tester in two polls by 52% to 44%, and in West Virginia, where no one seems to have bothered polling because Gov. Jim Justice, a Republican, seems sure to replace retiring Democrat Joe Manchin. In Trump-Vance’s Ohio, Democrat incumbent Sherrod Brown leads Republican challenger Bernie Moreno by only 0.6% in three October polls—a danger sign for a three-term incumbent. Republicans are challenging five incumbent or better-known Democrats in presidential target states. Democrats are still ahead in October pollings—by between 2.2% and 3.8% in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, and by a significantly larger 5% and 6.2% in Nevada and Arizona. In no case is the Democrat topping the magic 50% mark, which leaves at least three and perhaps all five Democrats vulnerable under standard political rules of thumb. Why has the campaign been trending away from Democrats? Three hypotheses: One is that “vibes” are not enough for even a four-month campaign. The “joy” that partisan Democrats felt after President Joe Biden’s withdrawal prevented a disastrous defeat was not shared by most voters. Plus, what I’ve called the Democrats’ “hide the candidate” strategy and Republican analyst John Ellis calls their “bubble wrap” strategy left many voters uncertain what Harris really thinks. Choosing a president is a voter’s most personal political choice, and even Harris’ careful discipline and great smile have not established personal connections. Her campaign seems to have recognized this by switching strategy and booking “60 Minutes,” Fox News, and CNN appearances, with disappointing results so far. That has left Harris open—my second hypothesis— to attacks on radical positions she has taken, especially in her 2019 campaign for the 2020 presidential nomination. Republicans, including Senate candidates as well as the Trump campaign, have been running TV ads on Harris’ opposition to fracking (especially in Pennsylvania), her support of phasing out nonelectric cars (especially in Michigan), her endorsement of transgender surgery for prisoners, and her support of biological boys in girls sports. “Kamala’s agenda is they/them, not you,” is one effective tagline. If you’re outside a target-state TV market, you probably haven’t heard much about these ads. As I wrote in September, part of the Harris strategy is to “trust a mostly sympathetic press, something like 90% of whose members want to see Trump lose, not to press hard on any subject that might not help the campaign.” Reporters and commentators, who mostly agree with Harris’ positions but recognize they’re widely unpopular, have tried to avoid these inconvenient subjects. But they can’t suppress the Harris videotapes or convince voters that a Harris administration, once installed, won’t pursue policies the candidate endorsed enthusiastically, and which have been repudiated unconvincingly by anonymous staffers’ tweets or Harris’ grudging promises to “follow the law.” My third hypothesis, advanced the day after the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, is that the reassuring tone of Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, tamped down fears of an erratic second Trump administration, while the flustered performance of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, “may damage the morale of Democratic voters” by making it harder for its core of liberal college graduates “to think of themselves as the smart people’s party.” That may have been a stretch—or it may turn out to help explain what appears to be lower Democratic participation in early voting this year. The one clear example is in the target state of Nevada, where well-respected veteran journalist Jon Ralston notes that Republicans lead in early voting this year and concludes that “if this becomes a trend and not an anomaly, it will be over” for Democrats. Anecdotal data suggesting similar trends in other target states should, however, be treated with caution. Of course, the polls once again could be wrong. They show fewer undecideds this year, leaving less room for Trump to overperform his poll percentages. It’s possible, as New York Times analyst Nate Cohn suggests, that polls weighting responses by voters’ recollected 2020 votes may understate Harris’ current strength. On the other hand, we’ve also seen increased Trump support from Hispanic and black men, and census data show population declines and, thus, probable turnout declines in central cities such as Philadelphia and Detroit and some counties. The fundamentals still favor Trump on the issues, with voters rating the Trump-Pence administration more positively than the Biden-Harris administration. Although many voters have problems with Trump’s character, his personal ratings are higher than they were in 2016 or 2020. Perhaps as indicative as Trump’s small but steady gains this October have been, the reactions to his stint at the fryer and drive-through window at a McDonald’s in Pennsylvania last weekend were even more revealing. Trump supporters, like the candidate, have been all smiles, while Trump opponents—check out the internet chatter—have been bristling with rage. Guess which side thinks it’s winning. (C) 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post The Democratic Party’s Bad October appeared first on The Daily Signal.

In what remains a nail-bitingly close presidential race, fewer than 25,000 votes could decide Wisconsin and its 10 Electoral College votes. Donald Trump won the Badger State in 2016 by 22,748 ballots. In 2020, he lost it by 20,982 votes. Given these low numbers and high stakes, this week’s findings by CommonSense Elections/StopBogusBallots.com are deeply worrisome. The vote-security watchdog group that I recently helped launch uses high-level fractal computing to reconcile current voter rolls with other government databases. These typically include property-tax records, post office change-of-address forms, Department of Motor Vehicles files, and the like. CommonSenseElections/StopBogusBallots.com’s recent analysis discovered mail-in ballot requests from—among others—the following active “voters.” They are registered at suspicious addresses in Wisconsin within these categories of doubt: 2,777: Permanently moved out of state 1,158: Moved to new Wisconsin counties but still are registered in old counties 275: Moved away but left no forwarding addresses 2,325: Undeliverable addresses, not found in U.S. Postal Service database 442: Nonresidential business locations 7,571: Missing or wrong apartment numbers (where stray ballots stack up in lobbies) 3,408: Duplicate registrations 1,251: Residents have received no mail for at least 90 days 10,877: Components of these addresses do not match the Postal Servicd database These anomalies alone (and there are others) affect 30,084 mail-in ballot requests associated with unqualified, possibly illegal addresses in Wisconsin. This number will rise, as more mail-in ballots somehow get completed and returned to election administrators’ offices, in numbers that already exceed Trump’s 2016 and Joe Biden’s 2020 margins of victory. Here is the key question: If these supposed “voters” have vacated Wisconsin, are duplicates, or “live at” nonresidential addresses, then who is requesting these mail-in ballots? “These registrants are at addresses that another official government database, other than the voter roll, says cannot receive ballots,” says election-security expert Jay Valentine, a cofounder of CSE/SBB.com. “These mail-in ballots are addressed to people who are gone,” Valentine explained. “They are undeliverable or dupes. When ballots cannot be delivered, they pile up in apartment-building mail rooms and lobbies or on the ground, where ballot harvesters collect them. These mail-in ballots also languish with junk mail at former residences or get returned to the post office. From there, they too often wind up in the hands of ballot crooks who vote them and submit them to be counted.” Is this the black magic of left-wing nongovernmental organizations, drop-box hucksters, and other shady activists? If there is an innocent explanation for this hanky-panky, let’s hear it! Next: CSE/SBB will scrutinize Pennsylvania’s voter rolls. We expect equally disturbing results. We will expose any skulduggery that we uncover, stir public outrage, and challenge such chicanery in the swing states: When mail-in ballots arrive from illegitimate—even illegal—addresses, we will try persuasion to convince election officials not to tabulate these bogus ballots. Failing that: Litigation remains an option. For further details—and to support these efforts—please visit Common Sense Elections at StopBogusBallots.com. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Who Requested 30,084 Mail-In Ballots From Fishy Addresses in Wisconsin? appeared first on The Daily Signal.