from RT: Yemeni Houthis claim to have hit three American Navy destroyers Yemen’s Houthi rebels have attacked American warships in the Middle East with a combined drone and cruise missile strike, the Pentagon confirmed on Friday. Earlier in the day, the military group claimed to have struck three US destroyers heading toward Israel in the […]

Diddy was jailed after the FBI found 1000 bottles of baby oil on his property. Diddy’s Lawyer accused Costco of providing baby oil in bulk to Diddy. Costco says they don’t even sell baby oil let alone in bulk. Drugstores and big box stores are scrambling to secure their baby oil. Baby oil will now... The post Baby Oil Under Assault. appeared first on DogFacePonia.

Some of President Donald Trump’s critics have endorsed everything from prison to assassination in their effort to derail his political movement. Then there was the New York case that sought to target Trump’s millions. His team of attorneys have been fighting the judgment handed down by Judge Arthur Engoron, and seemed to make a compelling case in appeals court recently. As Fox News reported: Engoron ruled that Trump and other defendants were liable for persistent and repeated fraud, falsifying business records, issuing false financial statements, conspiracy to falsify false financial statements, insurance fraud and conspiracy to commit insurance fraud. A five-judge panel on a New York appeals court in Manhattan heard oral arguments on the appeal on Thursday. The former president did not attend the oral arguments but was instead represented by his legal team. Trump attorney D. John Sauer argued that James’ lawsuit stretched New York consumer protection laws and said there were “no victims” and “no complaints” of Trump’s business from lenders and insurers. Sauer said the cause “involves a clear-cut violation of the statute of limitations,” pointing to transactions used in the non-jury civil fraud trial that dated back more than a decade. The appeals process has been underway for months, attracting significant social media attention along the way: HUGE UPDATE!!! The panel that is hearing President Trump’s appeal of the Judge Engoron civil fraud case where Trump was ordered to pay $454 Million is leaning towards reversing the ruling. These cases are the REAL FRAUD. TRUMP IS INNOCENT pic.twitter.com/5vNUqZ13yJ — Ty’s Tough Talk (@toughtalkty) September 26, 2024 In case you missed it, Trump’s appeal for the $454 million dollar judgement in NY did not go well for the Democrats. Soo bad in fact, that their closing statement was basically them begging to not be sanctioned for their impropriety… pic.twitter.com/dGd2jG877c — 1776 (@TheWakeninq) September 27, 2024 Maybe the appeals court saw the video of Letitia James campaigning on suing Trump into bankruptcy before she took office & while he was president & thought maybe this obvious abuse of power shouldn’t standhttps://t.co/Rb0um6xX67 https://t.co/WerDtk9wK6 pic.twitter.com/1X2KHBdfDS — Sean Fitzgerald (Actual Justice Warrior) (@IamSean90) September 27, 2024 As the New York Post reported, at least some of the arguments made by Trump’s attorneys seemed to resonate with the panel of judges: Trump’s lawyers, who have called Judge Arthur Engoron’s February ruling “draconian, unlawful, and unconstitutional,” appeared before a five-judge panel of a Manhattan appeals court Thursday to plead their case. Some judges appeared receptive to changing the bond. Judge Peter Moulton questioned whether James’ lawsuit turned into “something it was not meant to do.” Moulton observed that the “immense penalty in this case is troubling.” Here’s some Fox News Channel analysis of the latest developments:

One of the most infamous lines uttered during the 2016 presidential campaign came when Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton described millions of Americans as part of a “basket of deplorables.” Video of @HillaryClinton “basket of deplorables” remarks pic.twitter.com/4EMz6hciEp — Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) September 10, 2016 The attack on her rival’s supporters almost instantly backfired, with critics across the political aisle insisting that she went too far. Nearly a decade later, Clinton has not only refused to apologize or disavow her divisive language, she now thinks she didn’t go far enough. As Breitbart reported: Clinton reflected on the infamous and divisive comment she made during a fundraiser in 2016 in a Washington Post op-ed published on Wednesday, adapted from her new book Something Lost, Something Gained: Reflections on Life, Love, and Liberty. In the article, the former secretary of state recalled a meeting she had with a former white supremacist who now works to deprogram people leaving hate groups as an entry to discuss her “deplorables” comment, and said the term is “too kind a word” for some of Trump’s most fervent followers. “In 2016, I famously described half of Trump’s supporters as ‘the basket of deplorables.’ I was talking about the people who are drawn to his racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia — you name it. The people for whom his bigotry is a feature, not a bug,” Clinton wrote. “It was an unfortunate choice of words and bad politics, but it also got at an important truth. Just look at everything that has happened in the years since, from Charlottesville to Jan. 6. The masks have come off, and if anything, ‘deplorable’ is too kind a word for the hate and violent extremism we’ve seen from some Trump supporters,” she continued: Clinton also addressed part of her 2016 comment in which she said some Trump supporters are “irredeemable” and “not part of America,” writing that “part of me would still say this is objectively true.” She added that “empathy for people you agree with is easy. Empathy for someone you deeply, passionately disagree with is hard but necessary,” and that “as a Christian, I aspire to this kind of radical empathy but often fall short.” Of course, Clinton has issued similar denunciations of her political rivals in various forums since she lost the 2016 election. ‘VERY DANGEROUS’: Hillary Clinton faces backlash for stoking division with sharp rhetoric against Trump during an interview on a liberal network, one day after a second assassination attempt on the former president. She warned Trump would “do harm to our country” if re-elected. pic.twitter.com/HfPwTjMhyU — Fox News (@FoxNews) September 17, 2024 Hillary calls for “formal deprogramming” of Trump supporters. I believe Stalin had a word for that: gulags. pic.twitter.com/qMBZuCc9IC — toddstarnes (@toddstarnes) October 6, 2023 This woman is truly sick. The problem is what she’s saying is in line with the vast majority of Democrat party leaders today. When we call them, Marxists everyone must understand that that is not hyperbole and hasn’t been for quite some time pic.twitter.com/6XhMlcdZXx — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) October 6, 2023 By the same token, Clinton has been doing her best to prop up Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, including with her recent claim that Harris doesn’t need to actually tell voters what she would do if elected. As Fox News reported: Hillary Clinton forcefully argued that Vice President Kamala Harris didn’t need to clarify her policy positions in interviews and said that the 2024 Democratic candidate was facing a “double standard” from voters and the media. “She does not have to do it, Kara. I’m going to just cut to the chase,” Clinton told journalist and podcast host Kara Swisher on the “On with Kara Swisher” podcast this week. “In fact, she’s put out policies on her campaign website. Anybody who’s truly interested can go and read about them. She referenced policies. She actually doesn’t just have policies and concepts. She has plans about what to do,” Clinton said, referring to a policy page Harris added to her campaign website earlier this month. “I think it’s, um, you know, it’s a double standard, and it’s a double standard that is partly because they are still getting to know her. But also because they’re still grappling with the idea like, ‘Oh, am I really going to vote for a woman to be president and commander in chief?’” she continued. Here’s Bill O’Reilly’s take on Clinton’s recent media blitz:

The Michigan GOP and RNC just got their ninth win against Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D). They argued her new guidance was terrible at verifying absentee ballots. Was her goal to ensure that the verifying wasn’t secure? The court agreed because it’s still a bad idea to make voting security optional. Easy to vote, hard to cheat, why does that get so much pushback from Democrats? And the winnings keep coming. Cheating this year won’t be as easier, which leads us to guess that something big will be tried instead. BREAKING – A major victory for election integrity in Michigan as clerks are now required to verify signatures before counting mail ballots. LETS GO! GOP Chairman Michael Wheatley stated, “This decision ensures that every legal vote is counted, and the integrity of our… pic.twitter.com/B9EjxJ4VHN — Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) September 27, 2024 The Gateway Pundit reports: The RNC and Michigan GOP won a lawsuit against Michigan officials for failing to verify absentee ballots. Earlier this month Michigan Republicans sued Michigan’s Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson for failing to verify mail-in ballots. This was the NINTH lawsuit Jocelyn Benson has lost to the Republican Party! “Recent guidance issued by the Michigan Secretary of State will undermine protections for absentee voters, leading to improper handling and counting of absentee ballots. We are suing to protect absentee ballot safeguards in Michigan which will help make it easy to vote and hard to cheat in the Wolverine State.” Michigan Republican Party Chairman Pete Hoekstra stated: “Our Secretary of State is actively interfering in Michigan’s elections, disregarding the very laws she’s supposed to enforce. The Michigan Republican Party will never stop fighting for the safety and security of our elections, so every single Michigander can feel confident in their vote, no matter how they choose to exercise that right.” Great election integrity news out of battleground Michigan. Clerks were counting mail ballots without proof of signature verification, opening the door to fraud. The @GOP sued. Result? Ballots will now only be counted after proof that signatures are verified — a key win. — Michael Whatley (@ChairmanWhatley) September 27, 2024 Something else happened in Michigan, back in 2020. What was it again? Let me think… And here it is, CONSPIRACY DAY November 3, 2020, 16,000 HOURS OF SURVEILLANCE VIDEO VIOLATING THE LAW, 3 hours and 15 minutes after polls closed in Michigan, Detroit Heilmann voting center. Dana Nessel and Jocelyn Benson loading thousands of MAIL-IN- BALLOTS into a minivan… pic.twitter.com/KD7W8QS9yW — RealRobert (@Real_RobN) September 25, 2024