The final and most serious of Moscow’s “red lines” was crossed this week after the United States decided to “allow” Ukraine to use the weapons it and other Western nations donated to strike targets deep within Russian territory. Article by Ethan Huff, republished with permission from Naturalnews.com Washington’s plan, according to Congressman Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) as cited by Axios journalist Juliegrace Brufke, is to lift all restrictions on Kiev’s use of U.S.-provided ATACMs (Army Tactical Missile System). President Biden has confirmed that Washington is “working that out now.” Pretty much all the other major Western nations are in agreement that crossing Vladimir Putin’s infamous red lines is both “permissible” and reasonable in light of all the deep state assets and criminal schemes, i.e., human trafficking, that are protected by Ukraine’s very existence under Volodymyr Zelensky. Up until now, the West has merely been sending Ukraine the weapons and letting Zelensky do with them as he wishes, just so long as he does not use them to strike deep within Russian territory. This changed after Zelensky threw a hissy fit and demanded that he be allowed to use all of his new toys where Putin told him not to. “So far, the United States has given Kiev about $200 billion or more in both funding and military equipment and weapons,” reports SHTFplan.com about these latest developments. “Kiev has been clamoring for the restrictions against using long-range missiles as long-range missiles to be lifted since May. That also begs the question; was the U.S. always going to ‘allow’ Ukraine to cross Russia’s red lines? Because Washington did give kiev [sic] the long-range weaponry, so why would they ban them from using it indefinitely?” (Related: Be sure to check out our earlier report to learn more about how NATO and the West are plotting to trigger WWIII.) Has the final red line been crossed? Truth be told, the West likely planned this whole thing out ages ago. Western powers pretended to just be arming Ukraine for its own “self-defense,” knowing all the while that eventually Zelensky would use them against Russia in a major provocation towards World War III. “This should serve as a warning for the U.S.,” SHTFplan.com warns. “If Kiev does strike Russian territory using these donated weapons, it may be the final straw as Russia’s last red line is crossed.” U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced the policy changes this week during a visit to Kiev with David Lammy, his United Kingdom counterpart. “I talked to Blinken two days ago, and he is traveling with his counterpart from the UK to Kiev to basically tell them that they will allow them [to hit Russia with ATACMS],” McCaul confirmed. According to State Department spokesman Matt Miller, Blinken flew to Kiev “to show continued support for Ukraine’s defense.” Miller made no mention of any policy changes being made. What Blinken did was merely “signal,” according to Bloomberg, that Washington intends to change the rules now that reports have surfaced claiming that Iran has supplied Russia with ballistic missiles. Iran, in response, claims it did no such thing, claiming it supports neither side of the conflict. Whenever the U.S. needs an excuse to send more cash or weapons to foreign criminals, it most often trots out the “Iran is producing nuclear weapons” line. In this case, they upped the ante by claiming that Iran is sending those nuclear weapons to Russia, the other bogeyman Washington routinely uses to try to push unpopular foreign policy. “Forget that we are supporting a fake president, forget that we are supporting an aggressor on RF (Russian Federation) territory and forget that we are supporting a cabal that is killing Christians only. What is this mindset? You can’t understand their mental setup anymore,” one commenter wrote about the insanity of the West. Will the deep state succeed at unleashing a global nuclear holocaust before the election? Find out more at WWIII.news. Sources for this article include: SHTFplan.com NaturalNews.com

Slipknot forced to play earlier than planned and were onstage for under an hour as weather turned ugly

Fellow musicians rally to support Journey frontman Arnel Pineda after apparent vocal wobble at Rock In Rio

A Haitian community leader thinks the United States should have a fully open border. “America is a beacon of the world in terms of democracy, where they say that human [rights] have to be respected and where they say that they treat people with respect and dignity,” Viles Dorsainvil, the executive director of Springfield’s Haitian […] The post Haitian Leader: America…Should Be Open for Everybody appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Matt Walsh spent some time this week discussing his hit new comedy, “Am I Racist?” with media personality George Janko and musician Zuby. The conversation with Janko inevitably turned to what sparked the idea for the documentary. Previously, Walsh had starred in the 2022 documentary “What Is a Woman?,” which exposed radical gender theory in society. Walsh said his idea stemmed from the success of “What Is a Woman?” and the simple act of asking that question of so-called gender experts, which “takes down the whole house of cards.”  He said after the movie had “a real impact in the culture,” he was eager to take on another topic, especially since films have longer staying power compared to daily podcasts. “There was a question of, well what’s the next big topic?” Walsh said. “What’s the other big one? It’s pretty clearly race. And so we decided that has to be the topic.”  He also talked about taking a new approach for this film instead of being skeptical and asking questions. “With this, we thought it would be an interesting strategy if instead of being skeptical, I’ll start by asking questions to these race hustlers… and I’ll just believe whatever they tell me. I’ll let them guide me down the rabbit hole.”  “I’ll try to put into practice whatever they say,” Walsh added. “And we’ll see where it takes us. Where do we end up 90 minutes later into the film, if I’m actually believing all this stuff? That’s the journey of the movie.”  Walsh also said making this kind of movie made sense because he’s “contrarian by nature” and for right now, everything in the culture is so wrong that being contrary is actually the correct path. The podcast host and documentary star also appeared on “The Real Talk with Zuby” podcast to delve into details about the film. Zuby agreed with so many other reviewers, saying “Am I Racist” is “genuinely hilarious.” The pair spent some time talking about how Walsh was able to access some of the guests, and he said it all came down to one thing: money. “This thing is a grift; it’s a scam,” Walsh told Zuby. “We fully embraced the fact that we paid them. I think maybe they get dollar signs in their eyes and they’re willing to overlook things that would otherwise be red flags.” He also mentioned the “bubble” that most self-professed DEI experts live in, saying they aren’t even aware of people who disagree with them. “They live very insulated lives,” Walsh added. “To them it’s kind of unthinkable that they’d ever be in a room with anyone who would challenge them or try to expose them,” he said. Zuby said he was “amazed” that Walsh was able to speak with “White Fragility” author Robin DiAngelo, which Walsh said he did by wearing a very simple disguise and even using his real name.  The “Am I Racist?” star said DiAngelo was on the “wish list” when he and the crew first figured out what kind of movie to make, but he didn’t imagine they’d be able to get her. As for the motivations of the anti-racist followers, Walsh gave his thoughts on why they’re motivated to do what they do.  “I think that all of them have to believe it at some level, like psychologically… I think 75%, it’s a full on grift for them, where they know what they’re saying isn’t true, and there’s a 25% where they tell themselves that a lot of this stuff isn’t true, a lot of this stuff might be surface level harmful, but it’s for the greater good, and so this is what we have to do.” “I do think they believe in their own moral superiority,” he added. “Am I Racist?” debuted at number four at the box office alongside major Hollywood productions with much higher production and marketing budgets, The Daily Wire previously reported. The film currently has a 98% audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes and is Certified Hot on the site’s popcorn meter, which means at least 500 of those reviews come from verified ticket purchasers. Tickets are available at amiracist.com.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said over the weekend that he is most concerned about foreign actors interfering in U.S. elections by introducing deep fakes that go viral on social media and end up tilting who people vote for before the videos can be debunked. Rubio, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, made the remarks during a Sunday CBS News interview on “Face The Nation” with Margaret Brennan. He said that the scenario that he worries about is in the 48 hours before an election where a foreign action could release “fake audio or fake video generated using A.I.” that could influence the results of the election. “In very close races, it could tip the scales,” he said. “I do think all the way around, here’s the bottom line. If you see something out there, a video that just seems way too scandalous, I would pause for a second and make sure that it can be verified. That’s my advice to everybody is, don’t just believe something you see for the first time. It may have been something that happened five years ago, and they’re making it look like it happened yesterday.” “It may be something that – that has been made up using an A.I. mechanism to do so,” he continued. “And so that would be my advice to people as well. Again, I’m not saying 48 hours before the election is irrelevant in America. I am saying it’s probably less impactful than it is in some of these other countries, who don’t have mail voting, early voting, where so many of the votes are already in by then.” He then warned that the foreign operations targeting American elections could have their greatest impact at the congressional-level. “I think some of these lower ballot races are the ones that are particularly more susceptible, because, if you’re running for Congress or Senate somewhere, let’s say a congressional seat, and someone dumps something like this on you, it’s much harder to get the truth out there in time for it to be cleared up,” he said. “There just isn’t going to be as much interest, and there isn’t going to be as much people covering it.” WATCH:

Former President Donald Trump ruled out running again for president in 2028 if he does not win November’s election against Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump made the remarks in an interview that aired Sunday on “Full Measure” with host Sharyl Atkisson. “If you’re not successful this time, do you see yourself running again in four years?” Atkisson asked. “No, I don’t. No, I don’t,” Trump said. “I think that that will be, that will be it. I don’t see that at all.” Trump said that he does not think that it will come to that because he believes that he will be successful with his current campaign. Polls currently show a very tight race between Trump and Harris that is going to come down to just a handful of swing states where there is little distance between the two candidates in the polls. WATCH: Trump says he won’t run for office in 2028 if he doesn’t win the election in 2024. “I think that that will be, that will be it. I don’t see that at all. I think that hopefully we’re gonna be successful.” pic.twitter.com/bm6fsltaAH — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 22, 2024