Reading the Lie of the Green (and Polls)

Hey Nevadans, Whether you like it or not, your government will now make you pay for women you’ve never met to kill their unborn babies!  An unchallenged court ruling has officially made Nevada the 18th state to start spending Medicaid funds on “free” abortions for low-income women. This decision argues that denying coverage through the taxpayer funded program violates Nevada’s “Equal Rights Amendment” adopted in 2022.  “With this victory, more Nevadans will be able to make the best personal medical decisions for themselves and their families,” cheered Erin Bilbray-Kohn, executive director of the Silver State Hope Fund, in a statement obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union. She leaves out the part where those “personal medical decisions” are being paid for with other people’s money.  Now that 30 days have passed without the state government appealing it, the ruling is solidified. Nevada residents will be forced to pay taxes for abortions starting no later than early November, according to the judge who made the ruling. This upcoming Election Day, Nevadans will also vote whether the right to kill an unborn baby should be added as an amendment in their state constitution.  

These no-bake chocolate oatmeal cookies with peanut butter are a classic for a reason. They are so easy to make and always a hit. If you love no-bake recipes you must give these Avalanche Treats a try.. so easy and so good! Perfect for any occasion, these chocolate oatmeal cookies go great with them. ❤️WHY...

Republican vice presidential candidate Sen. JD Vance (Ohio) equated CNN anchor Dana Bash to a "Democratic propagandist" on Sunday after she appeared to accuse him of inciting violence.For several weeks, Vance has brought attention to the immigrant problem overwhelming the city of Springfield, Ohio, refusing to accept the media's outright dismissal of allegations that immigrants are targeting animals in the area. 'You accused me of causing a bomb threat. ... Don't you realize you're engaged in basic propaganda to silence the concerns of American citizens? Please.'Vance believes the allegations should be fully investigated not only because there is some evidence pointing to their validity but because his office has fielded numerous calls from constituents testifying to the problems.On CNN's "State of the Union," Bash accused Vance of placing his constituents "at risk" for bringing attention to the problems in Springfield.At first, Vance took the high road, ignoring the accusation. He told Bash the media "completely ignored" Springfield's problems until recently, explained how Vice President Kamala Harris' policy record would create more Springfield situations, and disclosed how many constituents have called his office to report problems in Springfield."My attitude is: Listen to my constituents," Vance explained. "Sometimes, they're going to say things that people don't like. But they're saying things that people don't like because their town has been overwhelmed, and it's my job to try to fight for them and to protect them."But instead of addressing the substance of Vance's comments, Bash responded by trying to fact-check him.The CNN anchor — who admitted to going light on Harris in her one sit-down interview with the Democratic presidential nominee — dismissed 911 calls and social media videos seemingly providing credibility to the animal-targeting allegations. Then she went a step further and directly accused Vance of "saying things that are wrong and actually causing the hospitals, the schools, the government buildings to be evacuated because of bomb threats."With that accusation, Vance finally had enough.The Republican lawmaker called Bash's accusation "disgusting," characterizing it as a comment that "is more appropriate for a Democratic propagandist than it is for an American journalist.""There is nothing that I have said that has led to threats against these hospitals," Vance added. "These hospitals, the bomb threats and so forth, it's disgusting. The violence is disgusting. We condemn it. We condemn all violence and threats of violence."As the interview went on, Vance tried, once again, to explain how policies that Harris supports hurt communities like Springfield. But Bash told Vance she did not want to discuss policies while repeatedly interrupting him."Dana, would you like to ask me questions and then let me answer them, or would you like to debate me on these topics?" Vance said. "I noticed that when you had Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, you gave them multiple choice answers to the questions that you asked and you allowed them to answer the questions. I'm happy to be here to talk about policy, but if you're going to interrupt me every single time that I open my mouth, then why am I even doing this?"For the rest of the interview, Bash asked Vance more leading and charged questions while repeatedly implying that he is lying about Springfield. Vance, for his part, tried to discuss immigration policies. But something incredible happened at the end of the interview.Despite having accused Vance of "saying things" that are "causing ... bomb threats" and suggesting that Vance and Donald Trump are responsible for the bomb threats because they happened after Vance and Trump brought attention to Springfield's problems, Bash outright denied having accused Vance of inciting violence. But Vance wouldn't let her get away with it."You accused me of causing a bomb threat," he said. "Don't you realize you're engaged in basic propaganda to silence the concerns of American citizens? Please."In her denial, Bash excused herself by claiming she was merely quoting the mayor of Springfield. But even that backfired on her."Look, the Springfield mayor, he's dealing with a lot of terrible things," Vance shot back. "But he did not accuse me of inciting a bomb threat. He just didn't. "And if we're going to take the firsthand accounts of people who are on the ground in Springfield, why don't you bring on some of the people on your program who say that the migrants are eating their pets?" he continued. "You're applying a double standard here. You're saying if one person accuses JD Vance, I'm going to take that person's word as the gospel truth even if you misrepresent it. If you have another person who's saying they're eating the cats, you're going to completely ignore them, attack them, silence them, and harass them."That double standard is why that people don't trust the media and why we're not talking about public policy 51 days out from a presidential election," Vance said. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A new poll says that the endorsement from pop superstar Taylor Swift won't make any difference in the voting habits of a vast majority of voters. The poll from ABC News/Ipsos found that 81% of respondents said the singer's endorsement of Democratic candidate Kamala Harris would have no effect on their vote. Another 13% said the endorsement would make it less likely that they back Harris. 'He went on to say he liked Swift's boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs star player Travis Kelce.' Only 6% of respondents said the endorsement would make it more likely that they back the Democrat in the presidential election. Swift said that abortion rights, LGBTQ rights, and in vitro fertilization were the leading issues that led her to support Harris over former President Donald Trump. Many other female celebrities "liked" her post on Instagram including Selena Gomez, Jennifer Garner, Jessica Alba, and Reese Witherspoon. Trump lashed out at her on Sunday, writing simply, "I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!" in a post on Truth Social. Later that day, shots rang out while the former president was golfing, and police arrested a man for allegedly trying to assassinate Trump. In February, Trump opined that Swift would never endorse President Joe Biden, who was the Democratic candidate at the time, and be disloyal to Trump because he had signed the Music Modernization Act and made her a lot of money. He went on to say he liked Swift's boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs star player Travis Kelce, "even though he may be a Liberal, and probably can’t stand me!" He also said that she was likely to pay a price in the marketplace for her support of Harris. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Despite multiple assassination attempts on former President Donald Trump, left-wing outlets have continuously suggested that Trump supporters would be the ones to turn to violence and even killings. They've even claimed that Trump has perpetuated this through violent rhetoric. For years, pundits have done their best to predict a militant uprising by Trump supporters who would apparently find inspiration in the allegedly ever-present, threatening tone that he instills in them at rallies and press conferences. Some of the worst offenders included blunt messaging that some Trump supporters were "highly likely" to commit murders due to Trump's rhetoric.'Trump Is Okay with Political Violence (by His Supporters).'University professor Brian Klaas appeared on MSNBC in October 2023 and said that Trump had been "saying things that could get people killed" so often that he had brought "normalcy" to it."What is highly likely going into the 2024 election is that a small subset of Trump's very well-armed and extremist base will try to kill people," Klaas told a panel.He added that Trump is guilty of "crazy incitement to violence."Following the second attempt on Trump's life, Klaas said on X that "political violence is abhorrent" but also that Trump "remains a serious threat to American democracy." — (@) CNN said in 2020 that Trump supporters could be "incited to future violence" by Trump's continued promotion of "2020 election lies." At the time, federal judges and prosecutors from the Justice Department were pushing this expectation of violence from Trump supporters, citing the threat of "disinformation" being used to radicalize them.In August 2022, the Atlantic claimed that Trump supporters had used violence to support him, with the "bad news" being that many other of Trump's "armchair revolutionaries'" were sincere in their violent rhetoric.The outlet also stated that the "dark talk" from Trumpers was intended to intimidate those who were investigating Trump's "many abuses of power" and galvanize and organize his "true believers."These believers, of course, were predicted to commit violence in his name.In August 2024, outlet the Bulwark published a piece titled "Trump Is Okay with Political Violence (by His Supporters)."The website, which describes itself as "honest news" in "good faith," said that Trump refused to condemn political violence committed by his supporters. The article went on to state that not only does Trump not accept jury verdicts against himself, he doesn't accept them against his supporters — who were referred to as "thugs" — either. There also exists a "Trump Hate Map" published by America's Voice. The page has the goal of mapping the locations of any hate crime that could possibly be connected to Trump in any way."We’ve seen the proof since his campaign launch in June 2015," the website reads.Often using the backdrop of January 6 as their hidden ace, these hopeful predictions of violence typically ignore the George Floyd riots in 2020 that resulted in 19 deaths and billions in property damage. They also failed to recognize CHOP and CHAZ, the short-lived communist occupied zones in Seattle and Washington, D.C., that featured the firebombing of police stations.Also forgotten are the many statues and monuments torn down by leftist protesters, as well as the fires set near the White House, including the Church of the Presidents.Accusations against Trump supporters are measured by the lowest bar possible, while left-wing violence seemingly is not measured at all.With now two attempts on Trump's life, it should be noted that taking shots at the former leader of the country and candidate for president barely hits the radar for many.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A teenage girl was killed after a hit-and-run driver plowed into a crowd following an after-midnight fight involving multiple teens over the weekend in downtown Minneapolis — and business owners and residents are fed-up with the lawlessness, WCCO-TV reported.Officers responded to a report of a hit-and-run crash on Fifth Street North at Hennepin Avenue around 12:23 a.m. Saturday, the station said, citing police, who said the female suspect drove in reverse on Hennepin and then drove the wrong way on Fifth Street into the crowd.Chief O'Hara added to WCCO, presumably in reference to the involved teenagers, that 'I'm not their parent, right? So I can tell you my kid isn't gonna be hanging out on Hennepin Avenue at 12:30 at night in the middle of all this stuff going on here with bars.'Six people were taken to Hennepin Healthcare, including a 16-year-old girl who later died, the station said, adding that another victim sustained life-threatening injuries while a handful of others suffered less serious injuries."The video of this incident is absolutely horrific," Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara said, according to WCCO. "There aren't words to describe how tragic and senseless it is."The station interviewed residents and business owners who expressed outrage and frustration over what they call an out-of-control environment that plays out on a weekly basis."It's a nuthouse out here, man," one downtown resident told WCCO. "That's every weekend. I'm surprised it hasn't happened sooner." The resident added to the station off camera that "it's a zoo out here, man, and it's not getting any better."Daniel Stensgaard, a business owner, added to the station that city leaders "should have their asses down here starting at 11 o'clock at night and let them walk around and watch the shortage of police officers and what's happened."Chief O'Hara added to WCCO, presumably in reference to the involved teenagers, that "I'm not their parent, right? So I can tell you my kid isn't gonna be hanging out on Hennepin Avenue at 12:30 at night in the middle of all this stuff going on here with bars."The police report added that the suspect drove out of downtown but that witnesses followed her, the station said. Police noted that representatives from multiple law enforcement agencies stopped the suspect on the 2300 block of Bryant Avenue North and arrested her, after which she was booked into Hennepin County Jail, WCCO said, adding that charges are pending.You can view a video report here about the incident, which includes interviews with concerned locals and business owners as well as a brief clip of the hit-and-run, which appears to end prior to the moment of impact.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The rain is pouring outside your window, drumming a staccato beat as you knock back your third whiskey of the evening. Work’s slow - too slow - but you can hear the wail of police sirens and the distant thump of gunfire. You know trouble’s coming and then in it walks, in the form of Fallen Aces, a retro noir immersive sim that just got a brand new update filled with gangsters, gabagool, and more. Continue reading Retro immersive sim Fallen Aces gets huge free gangster filled update MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best FPS games, Best classic games , Best indie games

Nir Barkat, often described as a potential Netanyahu successor, also told NR that Qatar is waging a trillion-dollar ‘soft war’ against Israel and the Jews.

Donald Trump was targeted by a shooter for the second time in two months, and, somehow, the former president is the one being blamed for it.