YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #camping
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Alexander Rogge
Alexander Rogge  shared a  post
1 y

Donte Money to INFOWARS

.


Amount

$
Search by username or email
INFOWARS
INFOWARS
1 y

Trump-Harris Debate Highlights — WATCH HERE https://www.infowars.com/posts..../trump-harris-debate

Attention Required! | Cloudflare
Favicon 
www.infowars.com

Attention Required! | Cloudflare

Site has no Description
Like
Comment
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Evil Techno Fascist Eric Schmidt Caught on Video, Incriminates Himself, Proves He is an Asshole
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Evil Techno Fascist Eric Schmidt Caught on Video, Incriminates Himself, Proves He is an Asshole

Evil Techno Fascist Eric Schmidt Caught on Video, Incriminates Himself, Proves He is an Asshole - Eric Schmidt: How Oligarchs Speak (when they think no one is listening) - 67,533 views September 7, 2024 UNFTR Media - Have you ever wondered what oligarchs talk about when they think no one is listening? Wonder no more. This week we dissect Eric Schmidt’s recent Q&A at Stanford University where he talks about remote work culture, the future of AI and how big tech intervenes at the highest levels of government. - The kicker is…he thought it was private and didn’t realize it was being recorded. Some of his comments regarding the laziness of remote workers and the “arrogance” of the programmer community went viral prompting Schmidt to apologize and scramble to have the video removed. - Considering he ran the world’s biggest internet search engine he should have known that nothing ever really disappears. In fact, we dug up his own words from 2013 when he said exactly that. Beyond the comments that got the most attention in the media (for a minute) the conversation reveals much more about the dark side of oligarchy in the United States. - CHAPTERS 00:00 - Introduction 01:41- Stealing Intellectual Property 05:10 - AI Energy and Investment Needs 08:45 - Work-Life Balance 09:51 - Startup Culture 13:03 - Competing with China 16:04 - War in Ukraine 18:14 - We don’t understand AI 20:37 - Free Market - Forgiveness over Permission 21:40 - AI Investment Bubble 23:37 - Election Misinformation 25:10 - Closing Thoughts 26:20 - Credits - ABOUT UNFTR Unf*cking the Republic (UNFTR for short) is progressive media organization that produces a longform podcast, YouTube videos, a twice weekly newsletter and original editorials on U.S. politics, socio economics and civil liberties. Our features attempt to explain how we arrived in Bizarro America, the funhouse mirror version of what was originally intended. - SUPPORT THE SHOW Become a Member or Leave us a Tip https://www.unftr.com/memberships Listen to the UNFTR Podcast https://www.unftr.com/episodes Buy our Native Roasted Coffee https://www.unftr.com/shop Check out our book list https://bookshop.org/shop/UNFTRpod Shop UNFTR Merch! https://www.unftr.com/merch Follow us on social @unftrpod - You can access all of our work at www.UNFTR.com #SocioEconomics #AmericanHistory - FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES - Mirrored From: https://www.youtube.com/@UNFTR
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Argentina Zionist President Milei Turns Authoritarian & is Blocking Freedom Of Information Rights
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Argentina Zionist President Milei Turns Authoritarian & is Blocking Freedom Of Information Rights

Argentina Zionist President Milei is Turning Authoritarian & is Blocking Freedom Of Information Rights 9-9-2024 - Restrictions on Freedom of information in Milei's Argentina - September 9, 2024 A Bloke in Buenos Aires - Does Freedom of Information in Milei's Argentina have limits? And what's so secret about the president's dogs? "Viva La Libertad, carajo" was Milei's campaign slogan last year. It means: "long live freedom, dam it!" And his political party is "La Libertad Avanca" - "freedom advances". But in Javier Milei's Argentina, what exactly does freedom mean? Argentine's love their dogs, and President milei seems to have a special afinity with his. He loved his dog - an Englsh Mastiff called Conan - so much, that when he died he had 4 clones made. - Biography in English: Javier Milei: An Economist Beyond Boundaries: https://amzn.to/3AaGX0y - News Theme 2 by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... Artist: http://audionautix.com/ 00:00 Introduction 00:26 Freedom of information in Milei's Argentina 02:39 Open government 04:34 Conan Milei and dogs in Argentina 06:17 Outro - FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES - Mirrored From: https://www.youtube.com/@ABlokeinBuenosAires
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

PUTIN: NO HOSTILE NATIONS JUST HOSTILE ELITES
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

PUTIN: NO HOSTILE NATIONS JUST HOSTILE ELITES

by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star: For some time I’ve been trying to warn that the current course of the West vis-a-vis its relations with Russia are on exactly the wrong course, and that the western leadership is seriously misunderstanding (1) the nature of the current situation, (2) how Russia views it, and (3) […]
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Ancient Celtic Helmet Unearthed in Poland
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Ancient Celtic Helmet Unearthed in Poland

The ancient Celtic helmet mid-excavation. Source: State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw and University of Warsaw, Poland.   An ancient Celtic helmet—the first of its kind to be found in Poland—was recently unearthed by an archaeological team at the Mazovia region’s Łysa Góra site. Over the course of a year, the team—hailing from the State Archaeological Museum and Warsaw University—also discovered hundreds of other artifacts related to farming, logging, and animal husbandry.   Celtic Helmet Dates Back 2,400 Years Source: State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw and University of Warsaw, Poland.   When the ancient Celtic helmet was discovered, archaeologists first assumed “it might be some kind of ancient vessel, because bronze vessels are much more common on Polish soil than helmets,” explained excavation leader Bartłomiej Kaczyński to Science in Poland. “It was only during the discovery of one of the characteristic elements, the so-called neck piece—an arched plate near the edge—that Dr. Andrzej Maciałowicz of the UW Department of Archaeology pointed out that it could be a helmet.”   Kaczyński continued, “The helmet is an example of the most advanced Celtic metallurgy and it seems that it may have been in the possession of a Celt. It was probably not given to this population, which existed at that time on the outskirts of any ancient world. The discovery therefore changes the previous perception of the scale of contacts with the Celtic world in the earlier pre-Roman period.”   Celtic Helmet Likely Linked to La Tène Culture Source: State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw and University of Warsaw, Poland.   Archaeologists believe the ancient Celtic helmet is linked to the La Tène culture. This was a group of European Celts who lived during the Late Iron Age. La Tène originated during the 5th century BCE when Celts first came into contact with Etruscan and Greek civilizations. The culture existed for hundreds of years, spreading across Europe and encompassing various local differences. The La Tène style of Celtic art typically features curving decorative lines, especially in metalwork.   The Long History of the Łysa Góra Site Remains of the pagan wall at the Łysa Góra site in Poland. Source: Wikipedia Commons.   Łysa Góra, where the Celtic helmet was unearthed, translates to “Bald Mountain” in Polish. At 1,952 feet, it is the second-tallest mountain in Poland‘s Mazovia region. In prehistoric Poland, it was likely a sacred site with a pagan temple. Łysa Góra is also at the center of a local legend about witches’ sabbaths.   Today, the archaeological site contains the ruins of a pagan wall from the 9th century and a Benedictine monastery that originated in the 11th century. The hill is also home to the 20th-century Święty Krzyż TV Tower, which is Poland’s tallest free-standing TV tower. Archaeological investigations at Łysa Góra have yielded La Tène artifacts since the 1970s, most of which were small fragments.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

10 Presidents Who Changed the US
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

10 Presidents Who Changed the US

  Since 1789, the United States has been led by forty-six presidents. Some have been more consequential than others, sometimes due to their own leadership and sometimes due to events outside of their control. While some presidents created change of their own accord, others managed change that was thrust upon the nation. Often, these chief executives combined the two, matching powerful external events with their own skills, tenacity, and ideas. In terms of presidents who changed the United States, it is difficult to narrow it down to a top ten list, but these ten commanders-in-chief are undeniable leaders of managing drastic changes in American life. From George Washington to Barack Obama, here are our top ten change-creating presidents.   1. George Washington (1789-96): Precedent-Setter Portrait of George Washington by Charles Willson Peale, 1780. Source: Virginia Humanities   A two-time war hero, Washington was famous well before being the only person unanimously elected president of the United States by the Electoral College. The tall, stately retired general and president of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was virtually the only man the Founding Fathers trusted to hold the powerful new position of chief executive. Fortunately for all, Washington was up to the task. Realizing that everything he did would set a precedent for future commanders-in-chief, Washington took his job as president seriously.   Most importantly, Washington limited his own power. Although his popularity would likely have allowed him to win re-election until his death, the winner of the American Revolutionary War limited himself to two terms. He also accepted a salary so that, someday, a non-wealthy man could afford to be president. Finally, Washington stayed true to the US Constitution and did not attempt to break its separation of powers and checks and balances. Famously, he urged America to continue to heed the document in his 1796 Farewell Address.   2. James Madison (1809-16): Constitutional Scholar General Andrew Jackson by John Vanderlyn, c. 1824. Source: The White House Historical Association   America’s fourth chief executive was the man who penned most of its Constitution: Virginia scholar James Madison. Although Madison did much work to lay the foundations of America before becoming a two-term president, his time in office was also noteworthy. Madison was president during the War of 1812, which saw the United States become embroiled in large-scale warfare for the first time since the Revolution. Although rarely seen as a great wartime leader, Madison presided over what is often seen as a US victory by holding off the British.   Domestically, Madison expanded the role of the federal government by creating the Second National Bank, a precursor to today’s monetary policy. He also led the United States to acquire lots of Native American territory, beginning the nation’s relentless westward expansion. After the War of 1812, the nation entered the Era of Good Feelings, which was characterized by relative peace and prosperity. Thus, between Madison’s Constitutional and presidential endeavors, the United States found a solid political and economic footing.   3. Andrew Jackson (1829-36): Mr. Populism General Andrew Jackson by John Vanderlyn, c. 1824. Source: The White House Historical Association   The Founding Fathers wanted the people to have power…but not too much power! America’s early republic was relatively limited in terms of popular democracy, thanks to voting requirements like property ownership and paying taxes. One champion of opening up the vote to all (white men) was War of 1812 hero Andrew Jackson. Jackson was America’s first champion of populism, or political power for the common man. Despite losing the election of 1824, thanks to controversial wheeling and dealing in the House of Representatives, Jackson tried again in 1828 and succeeded in a landslide.   A graph showing the political polarization of US presidents by political party support. Source: Cambridge University   Now president, Jackson began the era now known as Jacksonian Democracy. He substantially increased the power of the presidency, prompting criticism from traditionalists. Aggressively, he cleared more territory in the South of Native Americans and pursued continued westward expansion. However, he broke with his predecessor, James Madison, over the national bank, which he considered a tool of the elites to control the economy. Famously, Jackson refused to approve the national bank’s new charter, vetoing the bill and showing his willingness to use the powerful veto tool.   4. Abraham Lincoln (1861-65): Saver of the Union A photograph of sixteenth US president Abraham Lincoln, who guided the nation through the American Civil War (1861-65). Source: National Park Service   While Jackson was known for brashness, Abraham Lincoln was a master of calm, firm leadership. It was desperately needed, for the nation plunged into the American Civil War within mere months of Lincoln’s inauguration in 1861. The Illinois politician, who had famously opposed slavery, was forced to walk sociopolitical tightropes as he tried to guide the Union through the Civil War. How could he defeat the Confederacy soundly without causing too much strain on the Union’s economy and manpower?   Fortunately, Lincoln was able to walk the line and maintain an aggressive war that led to the unconditional surrender of the Confederacy while preventing political and economic chaos at home. He abolished slavery and set the stage for the United States to become an economic powerhouse. His signing into law of the Homestead Act of 1862 definitively settled the West and achieved America’s Manifest Destiny. It is little surprise that Lincoln’s presidency, which ended with his tragic assassination only weeks before the end of the Civil War, is often considered the end of the United States’ first volume of history in history classes.   5. Theodore Roosevelt (1901-08): Trust-Buster A photograph of Theodore Roosevelt, the youngest-ever US president at age 42 in 1901. Source: Library of Congress   Brashness, aggression, and populism returned to the White House with Theodore Roosevelt in 1901. “Teddy” Roosevelt was the nation’s youngest chief executive and had moved from vice president to president after the assassination of William McKinley in 1901. Like Andrew Jackson, Roosevelt was a war hero—volunteering to be a cavalry officer during the Spanish-American War. Unlike Jackson, however, Roosevelt was a staunch opponent of the spoils system and was a Progressive Era reformer.   Theodore Roosevelt was the iconic Progressive Era president who worked hard to move America past the inequalities of the Gilded Age and the spoils system of politics championed by Jackson. He wanted to reform the civil service, bust up trusts (monopolies), and keep European powers out of the Western Hemisphere. Roosevelt aggressively grew federal government power, both domestically in terms of regulating industries and internationally in terms of military power. He spoke softly and carried a big stick.   6. Woodrow Wilson (1913-20): Foreign Policy Leader A 1916 photograph of US president Woodrow Wilson throwing out the ceremonial first pitch at a baseball game. Source: Virginia Humanities   Republican president Theodore Roosevelt’s efforts were largely cemented by his (hated) successor, Democrat Woodrow Wilson. Despite their partisan differences, both men were Progressive Era reformers. Wilson created the National Park Service, which Roosevelt had championed. Wilson also presided over the passage of the 18th Amendment to prohibit the sale of alcohol and the 19th Amendment to give women the right to vote. However, Wilson’s true claim to fame was foreign policy. Wilson guided America through World War I, which he had first sought to avoid.   With conscious deliberation to enter the war after multiple aggressions by Germany, Wilson skillfully helped mold America into a world power that aided the Allied Powers in inflicting a decisive defeat on Germany. After the war, Wilson himself traveled to Paris to try to craft a post-war peace. Famously, Wilson’s Fourteen Points created the League of Nations, an international body that attempted to prevent conflicts. Although the League ultimately failed, years after the US Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles that would have mandated America’s entry into the body, Wilson gets credit for the idea that would eventually lead to the United Nations.   7. Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933-45): Depression Fighter A photograph of Franklin D. Roosevelt, the US president during both the Great Depression (1929-39) and World War II (1941-45). Source: National Public Radio (NPR)   Despite the rapid growth of the federal government during the Progressive Era and World War I, there was still one policy area where there was little federal presence: social welfare. When the Great Depression erupted after the stock market crash of 1929, there were few tools for the government to assist the collapsing economy. Millions lost their jobs and their homes. Despite a popular outcry for assistance, conservative US President Herbert Hoover believed that the federal government should not be in the business of providing direct aid to citizens. In the 1932 presidential election, Democratic rival Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) promised to reverse this…and was elected in a historic landslide.   True to his word, FDR immediately put the power of the executive order—along with laws passed by a supportive Congress—to work in channeling federal dollars to the unemployed. His New Deal reforms allowed for deficit spending to get money flowing through the economy again. When World War II erupted after Pearl Harbor, FDR’s strong leadership continued. By the time FDR passed away in April 1945—after winning an unprecedented four terms as president—he had turned the United States into the world’s superpower. The Great Depression was over, and America had helped the Allies defeat both Nazi Germany and imperialist Japan.   8. Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-68): Big Dreamer A photograph of US president Lyndon B. Johnson meeting with American soldiers in Vietnam. Source: LBJ Presidential Library   FDR’s use of the federal government to fight poverty was revitalized in the mid-1960s under fellow Democratic president Lyndon B. Johnson. Johnson, a former Senate Majority Leader, used his strong ties to Congress to push through more groundbreaking legislation than any president aside from FDR himself. He helped push through the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended segregation in all public accommodations, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which drastically increased voter registration by minorities by ending Southern states’ use of biased literacy tests.   Johnson also created broad programs to fight poverty and social inequality in his War on Poverty and Great Society initiatives. These initiatives led to the creation of Medicare (complementing FDR’s Social Security), Medicaid, and the passage of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to guarantee all public school students an equitable education. Although Johnson’s aggressive escalation of the Vietnam War quickly tainted his image and led to him not seeking re-election in 1968, his domestic policy effects cannot be overstated.   9. Ronald Reagan (1981-88): Conservative Resurgent Ronald Wilson Reagan by Everett Raymond Kinstler, 1991. Source: The White House Historical Association   The opposite of Democratic president Lyndon B. Johnson is often seen as Republican president Ronald Reagan. Johnson sought to expand the federal government to fight inequality, while Reagan sought to reduce the size of the federal government to eliminate burdensome taxes and regulations that had allegedly sapped economic growth. Reagan was elected in 1980 after the post-Vietnam economic malaise of the 1970s, promising to cut taxes and boost defense spending to restore vigor and competitiveness to American society. Reaganomics, the popular name for Reagan’s tax cuts and boosted defense spending, did restore the economy’s growth by 1984, leading to a record-breaking landslide re-election victory. The defense spending also essentially bankrupted America’s Cold War rival, the Soviet Union, leading to its eventual collapse in 1991. Although Reagan’s tax cuts and defense spending caused the national debt to soar, the former California governor is largely credited with winning the Cold War. He is also often credited with restoring confidence in America’s vitality to many citizens.   10. Barack Obama (2009-16): Inspirer of the Marginalized A photograph of Barack Obama, the first nonwhite US president (2009-16). Source: Occidental College   In 2008, the United States elected its first Black candidate to the White House, answering a question that many had asked since the end of slavery: could anyone other than a white man ever hold the nation’s highest elected office? Barack Obama’s election in 2008 was more than just a victory for social equality: the Democratic candidate came with domestic policy goals as well. Obama carried on the Democratic Party’s goal of increased healthcare coverage with the largest healthcare reform since Lyndon Johnson’s Medicare and Medicaid programs: the Affordable Care Act.   Also known as Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act affected health insurance coverage for millions of Americans. It required health insurance plans to offer comprehensive coverage, allowed dependents to remain on parents’ plans through age 25, and prevented plans from rejecting applicants for pre-existing conditions. Although many complained that the new health insurance plans were more expensive than their predecessors, supporters argued that the new plans were a better deal and provided better protection for patients. While historians have years to debate Obama’s legacy, his personal characteristics and titular health care reform definitely make him a change-creator.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Who Won the Battle of Fredericksburg?
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Who Won the Battle of Fredericksburg?

  At the Battle of Antietam in September 1862, the Union won a great victory and prevented the Confederacy from securing diplomatic recognition from European powers. Three months later, however, public pressure was on the Union to show that it could destroy a Confederate army. Thus far, the Confederates had always been able to retreat relatively unscathed. Union general Ambrose Burnside went on the offensive, hoping to score a decisive victory.   Victory Goes to the Confederacy A Currier & Ives image of the Battle of Fredericksburg, fought on December 13, 1862 in Virginia. Source: The Huntington Library, Art Museum, and Botanical Gardens, San Marino, CA   The Battle of Fredericksburg was a significant victory for the Confederacy and perhaps its most lopsided victory in a major battle. Fredericksburg was one of several attempts by the Union to break up the stalemate at the Virginia border. US President Abraham Lincoln had selected Union General Ambrose Burnside as the more aggressive replacement for General George McClellan, whom Lincoln blamed for not sufficiently pursuing the retreating Confederates after the Battle of Antietam in September 1862.   With a large force of some 120,000 men, Burnside set off to finally accomplish what had been attempted before at the Battle of First Manassas in July 1861 and the Battle of Second Manassas in August 1862. Burnside’s plan was to move as quickly as possible to surprise the Confederates and hopefully break through to an open path toward Richmond, Virginia. On December 11, 1862, the battle began when Burnside’s forces crossed the Rappahannock River and landed at Fredericksburg, Virginia. Union forces used frontal wave attacks against entrenched and experienced Confederate defenders, resulting in few gains and massive casualties. By the evening of December 14, a clear Confederate victory emerged, and Burnside retreated the following day back across the river.   Timeline of the Battle of Fredericksburg A map showing the Union and Confederate movements between 10:00 AM and 5:00 PM on December 13, 1862 during the Battle of Fredericksburg. Source: American Battlefield Trust   By November 17, 1862, General Burnside had stationed his army of three oversized divisions on the northern side of the Rappahannock River. For over a week, he waited for pontoon bridges that would allow his men to cross in force into the town of Fredericksburg, Virginia, to arrive.   On December 11, New York engineers began trying to construct the pontoon bridges but quickly came under Confederate gunfire. The Union responded with a massive artillery bombardment of the town of Fredericksburg, Virginia, hoping to dislodge the Confederate sharpshooters who were preventing the assembly of the pontoon bridges. Despite some 8,000 shells battering the town, the Confederate sharpshooters remained.   Union forces now used pontoon boats to cross the river, arriving at Fredericksburg and engaging in street-to-street urban combat. The city was taken, and the bridges were completed to allow the rest of Burnside’s army to cross by December 12.   Early on the morning of December 13, the Union forces began to advance out of Fredericksburg, only to encounter well-entrenched and experienced Confederate defenders led by General “Stonewall” Jackson and his superior officer, Robert E. Lee. Multiple frontal assaults by Union troops failed, resulting in massive casualties.   By the next day, December 14, Burnside accepted that he had lost after his subordinate officers convinced him that future attacks would be fruitless.   What Caused the Battle of Fredericksburg? US President Abraham Lincoln (center, with top hat) with Union General George McClellan and staff in 1862 shortly after the Battle of Antietam. Source: Humanities Texas   The Battle of Fredericksburg was caused by mounting political pressure to secure a victory against the Confederacy. Despite having driven back the Southerners at Antietam in September, many were frustrated that General George McClellan had allowed Robert E. Lee’s forces to return home relatively unscathed. In the elections of 1862 in October and November, anti-war Democrats made political gains, worrying Lincoln’s administration. If the war continued to go sluggishly, Democrats might win enough power to force negotiations with the Confederacy.   Thus, McClellan’s replacement, Ambrose Burnside, knew exactly what was expected of him: strike quickly and hopefully open a path to Richmond to end the Confederacy once and for all. President Abraham Lincoln approved General Burnside’s plan to move against Lee immediately. One reason the battle erupted was the oncoming winter. The pontoon bridges had arrived slowly, and Burnside either needed to attack immediately or wait for better weather in the spring of 1863. Worried that Lincoln would be upset by a delay of several months, Burnside chose to attack on December 11.   Why Was the Battle of Fredericksburg Significant? Framed photographs of Union general Ambrose Burnside (left) and US President Abraham Lincoln (right), with a message from the latter to the former. Source: Library of Congress   The Battle of Fredericksburg was significant for multiple reasons. First, it was the largest battle in terms of forces committed (actual troops in battle) during the Civil War. Second, it was the Confederacy’s most lopsided victory in a large-scale battle, with the South suffering only half as many casualties as the North. The Union’s poor performance in the battle signaled that there would be no quick end to the war, underscoring previous failed attempts at rushing on Richmond. As a result, Lincoln’s political woes continued, with critics going so far as to call the president weak.   In the South, the victory did much to reinvigorate morale. Despite the Confederacy’s ailing economy and lack of foreign recognition and aid, many felt that superior Southern military leadership and fighting skills would win the war. Thus, Fredericksburg contributed to Southern enthusiasm that led to the Battle of Chancellorsville the following May, which then led directly to the decision to invade the North again at Gettysburg. Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville can be seen as the one-two punch that locked in the Confederate decision to go on the offensive again in 1863.   5 Facts About the Battle of Fredericksburg A drawing of Union troops arriving at Fredericksburg, Virginia at the start of the battle in December 1862. American Battlefield Trust   1. Casualties Casualties at Fredericksburg were relatively low for such a large number of troops committed, coming in at only 18,500 reported casualties. However, the figure was very lopsided, with Union troops suffering some 12,500 casualties compared to only about 5,300 for the Confederacy. This is not to imply that the combat was not intense—it was very intense but occurred in a small area. However, despite the North suffering more than twice the rate of casualties as the South, its vast advantage in manpower and industrial output quickly replenished the Army of the Potomac.   2. Commanders Union forces were led by Ambrose Burnside, whose distinctive style of facial hair is now named after him. A native of Indiana, Burnside graduated from West Point during the Mexican-American War as part of the Class of 1847, thus making him younger than most of his general officer compatriots. Despite being relieved from leading the Army of the Potomac after his loss at Fredericksburg, Burnside went on to become a US Senator from the state of Rhode Island.   Confederate forces were led by Robert E. Lee, commander of the Army of Northern Virginia. Seventeen years older than Burnside, Lee saw action in Mexico in 1847 and became renowned as a military officer. Despite being offered command in the Union upon the outbreak of the Civil War with the Battle of Fort Sumter, Lee chose instead to fight for his native state of Virginia as part of the Confederacy. Lee died five years after the end of the Civil War, during which time he became president of Washington College in Lexington, Virginia.   3. Number of Forces Involved A map showing the location of Union (blue) and Confederate (red) armies in the December 1862 Battle of Fredericksburg. Source: Virginia Humanities   Roughly 200,000 troops were present at the Battle of Fredericksburg, with up to 123,000 from the Union and some 78,000 from the Confederacy. However, not all these forces engaged in fighting, with reports indicating that only 114,000 Union troops were engaged against about 72,000 Confederates. Compared with earlier battles in the Civil War, these were staggering numbers of troops that significantly outmatched both Second Manassas and Antietam.   4. Visiting Fredericksburg, Virginia Today Today, the battlefield can be seen as part of the Fredericksburg & Spotsylvania National Military Park. Due to the large number of Civil War engagements fought in the area, it can be difficult to separate each battle into its own distinct landmark. The specific battlefield for the Battle of Fredericksburg is now located near downtown Fredericksburg, Virginia. Visitors can take a driving tour and visit individual monuments dedicated to skirmishes and participants during the battle.   5. Trivia: First Large-Scale River Crossing While Under Fire The Battle of Fredericksburg saw many rather unique features, including urban combat. One true first, however, is a large-scale river crossing while under fire. When Union troops tried to cross the Rappahannock River by pontoon boat on December 11, 1862, they were fiercely attacked by Confederate sharpshooters stationed in the town of Fredericksburg. The bitter fighting during the river crossing later contributed to Union forces pillaging the town in anger, which was considered the worst war looting up to that point in the conflict.   Aftermath of Fredericksburg: Stalemate in Virginia A paper from the 1890s describing similar experiences during the US Civil War under Ambrose Burnside at Fredericksburg and Joseph Hooker at Chancellorsville. Source: Library of Congress   Burnside’s defeat at Fredericksburg was tragic and humiliating, leading the general to briefly consider a January offensive. The “Mud March” of January 1863 was a brief but miserable attempt to once again outpace Robert E. Lee and pass him to get to Richmond. After two days of marching in a torrential downpour, Union forces spotted the Confederates already in position. The offensive was aborted, and Burnside would later be relieved of his command to be replaced by General Joseph Hooker.   The stalemate between the Union’s Army of the Potomac and the Confederacy’s Army of Northern Virginia would continue until the final months of the war when the exhausted South could no longer maintain defenses. A later attempt to attack Lee, Hooker’s offensive at Chancellorsville in May 1863, would also result in failure and add to Lee’s glowing reputation as a military strategist. As with Burnside before him, Hooker was forced to retreat back across the Rappahannock River, leaving the Confederates celebrating their success…but suffering irreplaceable casualties.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Taylor Swift Endorsing Harris While Calling Herself "Childless Cat Lady"
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Trump vs. Harris AND Moderators - Will There Be Another Debate? With Halperin, Hogan, and Spicer
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Megyn Kelly Says She's "Disgusted" by Terrible Performance of Biased ABC Debate Moderators
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 12695 out of 56669
  • 12691
  • 12692
  • 12693
  • 12694
  • 12695
  • 12696
  • 12697
  • 12698
  • 12699
  • 12700
  • 12701
  • 12702
  • 12703
  • 12704
  • 12705
  • 12706
  • 12707
  • 12708
  • 12709
  • 12710

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund