YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #camping
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

The 3 Rolling Stones albums Keith Richards said are underrated
Favicon 
rockandrollgarage.com

The 3 Rolling Stones albums Keith Richards said are underrated

The Rolling Stones are one of the most prolific bands of all time since they have released 31 studio albums and 13 live records during the last six decades. With Mick Jagger and Keith Richards as the main songwriters, the band sold an estimated amount of more than 250 million records worldwide, making them one of the best-selling groups in the history of music. With so many records to listen to, some of them tend to get a little bit overlooked and Richards agrees with that. The guitarist already mentioned three albums from their discography that he considers to be underrated. The 3 Rolling Stones albums Keith Richards said are underrated “Bridges To Babylon” (1997) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUjd8lt2EBY&pp=ygUXSG93IENvdWxkIEkgU3RvcCBzdG9uZXM%3D The first one is "Bridges To Babylon", which was the last studio album Stones released in the 90s. Richards talked about that record in an interview with GQ in 2020. He was asked to pick his favorite album of the band but he said it was a really hard thing to do because he liked all of them. So he mentioned many albums he liked and noted that "Bridges To Babylon" is an underrated one. Always hard to pick favorites. I would go anywhere between Beggars Banquet, Sticky Fingers, Let It Bleed, Exile on Main St. And I will go also to Bridges to Babylon, which is, I think, much underrated. During a press conference to promote the album in the late 90s, the guitarist was asked how they kept coming up with good songs. His answer was: “It never stops. You don’t write them, they come to you. It’s the thing you gotta do. You receive, you transmit. You don’t create, you know.” That record has famous tracks like “Anybody Seen My Baby”, “Out Of Control”, “How Can I Stop” and “Saint Of Me”. It peaked at number 3 on the US Billboard 200 chart and 6 on the UK albums chart. "Undercover" (1983) and "Emotional Rescue" (1980) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iw_BE_X9sA&pp=ygUQRW1vdGlvbmFsIFJlc2N1ZQ%3D%3D Back in 1998, when the band was promoting "Bridges To Babylon", Keith Richards gave an interview to Dean Goodman. He asked the guitarist if he believed albums like "Undercover" and "Emotional Rescue" were underrated. The musician agreed with that and even mentioned a few songs from other records he liked. “Yeah (I agree), it’s a funny thing. I can’t really put a finger on that. You even mentioned 'Get Some Sleep Tonight (From 'Dirty Work' - 1986).' Not a lot of people know that one! And it’s always been another one that I’ve wanted to work up." "We also rehearsed 'How Could I Stop' (From 'Bridges To Babylon' - 1997) as well. Knowing that we’re kinda carrying on next year, I figured well I’ll stick with this lot for a bit. I’ll do some different ones when we get back,” Keith Richards said. Released in 1980, "Emotional Rescue" had the famous title-track and also praised songs like "She's So Cold" and "Send It To Me". That album peaked at number 1 on the UK albums chart and US Billboard 200. "Undercover", released in 1983, wasn't as successful as "Emotional Rescue". There were no big hits in it and the most famous songs are "Undercover of the Night" and "She Was Hot", for example. It peaked at number 3 on the UK albums chart and number 4 on the US Billboard 200.The post The 3 Rolling Stones albums Keith Richards said are underrated appeared first on Rock And Roll Garage.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Attention Ladies: This Lady Cuts Open Her Padded Bra and Finds This in it...
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Attention Ladies: This Lady Cuts Open Her Padded Bra and Finds This in it...

Well there you go......they'll do anything to help you DIE........
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Prosecutors: Trudeau Facing Prison for Destroying 'mRNA Genocide' Evidence
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Prosecutors: Trudeau Facing Prison for Destroying 'mRNA Genocide' Evidence

The Canadian government has urgently withdrawn all Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines following a series of momentous scientific discoveries about the mRNA shots, and mainstream media has been ordered to cover up the magnitude of what is taking place before our eyes. Trudeau and Health Canada have ordered tens of millions of Covid vaccines to be returned to the government and destroyed following the revelation that mRNA technology contains self-assembling nanobots. As investigators scramble to preserve evidence of the crime against humanity in Canada, international prosecutors are warning that Trudeau and leading figures behind the vaccine roll out are facing decades behind bars. With thanks to:- https://rumble.com/c/THEPEOPLESVOICE - Stay safe with life-saving meds: https://affordablerxstore.com Promo Code TPV10 for 10% off. - Become a member of the world’s first ever cyber nation: https://joseon.com - Visit https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/IPV6 to take back control of the Internet
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Nanotech, Injections, and Surveillance - "Internet of Bio-Nanotech"
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Nanotech, Injections, and Surveillance - "Internet of Bio-Nanotech"

Remember when Japan trashed millions of vaccines after they found black precipitates that interacted with magnets? Now a Japanese study has found evidence of self-assembling nanotech as we look at a research paper from 2015, "The Internet of Bio-Nanotech" from IEEE. "Tiny, concealable, and non-intrusive Things are needed" and organized with… ◦ Control Unit ◦ Memory Unit ◦ Processing Unit ◦ Power Unit ◦ Transceivers ◦ Sensing & actuation Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver Learn what you can do to help the American bee population at https://patriotbeebest.com/ Enter Promo code DKS10 for 10% off any subscription or single issue purchase. Follow The David Knight Show on Rumble and watch the show live every weekday 9:00am EST – 12:00pm EST: https://rumble.com/c/TheDavidKnightShow For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code KNIGHT Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764 Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.com Cash App at: $davidknightshow BTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7 https://rumble.com/c/TheDavidKnightShow
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Australia - Typical LOW IQ Leftists call COVID INVESTIGATION 'kooky conspiracy theory'
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Australia - Typical LOW IQ Leftists call COVID INVESTIGATION 'kooky conspiracy theory'

The most unhinged Senate Speech ever given. This week in the chamber, a motion was put forward to hold a Royal Commission into Covid. The response from Labor was to insult anyone who supported the motion as you guessed it “a conspiracy theorist.” This shows that the Labor Party clearly have no interest in putting the people first. They always have and always will be about command and control. Thanks Senator Rennick. Thanks to Milkbar TV for the mashup. #auspol
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

Mom who saved pet goose from eagle while breastfeeding is a mascot for moms everywhere
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Mom who saved pet goose from eagle while breastfeeding is a mascot for moms everywhere

How do you explain motherhood in a nutshell? Thanks to Cait Oakley, who stopped a preying bald eagle from capturing her pet goose as she breastfed her daughter, we have it summed up in one gloriously hilarious TikTok. The now viral video shows the family’s pet goose, Frankie, frantically squawking as it gets dragged off the porch by a bald eagle—likely another mom taking care of her own kiddos. Wearing nothing but her husband’s boxers while holding on to her newborn, Willow, Oakley dashes out of the house and successfully comes to Frankie's rescue while yelling “hey, hey hey!” The video’s caption revealed that the Oakleys had already lost three chickens due to hungry birds of prey, so nothing was going to stop “Mama bear” from protecting “sweet Frankie.” Not even a breastfeeding session. Oakley told TODAY Parents, “It was just a split second reaction ...There was nowhere to put Willow down at that point.” Sometimes being a mom means feeding your child and saving your pet all at the same time. As for how she feels about running around topless in her underwear on camera, Oakley declared, “I could have been naked and I’m like, ‘whatever, I’m feeding my baby.’”Needless to say, people were impressed with Oakley’s fierce multitasking abilities. “Tell me you're a super mom without telling me you're a super mom,” wrote one person. Another added, “this was 100% the most badass, amazing, award deserving feat I have ever seen.”To no one’s surprise, moms were finding the situation ultra relatable. “I wish I could say I hadn’t run out mid breastfeed to save a chicken lol but that would be a lie,” one mom commented. “My husband sent [this] to me and said hey look it’s you,” wrote another.And perhaps the best comment of all:“Girl I thought that was a water gun. Read the caption and realized it was a baby.”Though she clearly wowed the internet, Oakley sees the entire fiasco as a mundane reality. "It feels like an accomplishment, I suppose,'' she told TODAY, “but for me this was a day in the life." Not every mom has to save a pet goose from an eagle attack and breastfeed at the same time, but most mothers can relate to the almost comical, certainly never-ending juggling act that is parenting. This article originally appeared on 6.27.22
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

Wil Wheaton gave a perfect explanation of how to separate problematic artists from their art
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Wil Wheaton gave a perfect explanation of how to separate problematic artists from their art

When you find out an actor whose work you enjoy is blatantly racist and anti-semitic in real life, does that realization ruin every movie they've been a part of? What about an author who has expressed harmful opinions about a marginalized group? What about a smart, witty comedian who turns out to be a serial sexual assaulter? Where do you draw the line between a creator and their creation? As someone with his feet in both worlds, actor Wil Wheaton weighed in on that question and offered a refreshingly reasonable perspective. "Question: I have more of an opinion question for you. When fans of things hear about misconduct happening on sets/behind-the-scenes are they allowed to still enjoy the thing? Or should it be boycotted completely? Example: I've been a major fan of Buffy the Vampire Slayer since I was a teenager and it was currently airing. I really nerded out on it and when I lost my Dad at age 16 'The Body' episode had me in such cathartic tears. Now we know about Joss Whedon. I haven't rewatched a single episode since his behavior came to light. As a fan, do I respectfully have to just box that away? Is it disrespectful of the actors that went through it to knowingly keep watching?" And Wheaton offered this response, which he shared : " Answer: I have been precisely where you are, right now. In fact, we were just talking about this a few days ago, as it relates to a guy who wrote a ton of music that was PROFOUND to me when I was a teenager. He wrote about being lonely and feeling unloved, and all the things I was feeling as a teenager. He grew up to be a reprehensible bigot, and for years I couldn't listen to one of the most important bands in my life anymore. But this week, someone pointed out that he was one member of a group that all worked together to make that thing that was so important to me. And the person he was when he wrote those lyrics is not the person he is today. And the person I was when I heard those lyrics doesn't deserve to be shoved into a box and put away, because that guy is a shit. This is a long way of saying that Joss sure turned out to be garbage. Because of who my friends are, I know stuff that isn't in the public, and it's pretty horrible. He's just not a good person, and apparently never was a good person. BUT! Buffy is more than him. It's all the actors and crew who made it. It's all the writers who aren't Joss. Joss is part of it, sure, and some of the episodes he wrote are terrific. At least one of the episodes he wrote was deeply meaningful to you at a moment in your life when you'd experienced a loss I can only imagine. The person you are now, and the 16 year-old you were who just lost their dad, are more important than the piece of shit Joss Whedon revealed himself to be. His bad behavior is on him. He has to live with it, and the consequences of it. Wil Wheaton | Wil Wheaton speaking at the 2012 Phoenix Comic… | Flickr www.flickr.com 16-year-old you, who just lost their dad, shouldn't have to think about what a shit Joss Whedon is for even a second. That kid, and you, deserve to have that place to revisit when you need to go there. I can't speak for the other actors, even the ones I know. But I will tell you, as an abuse survivor myself who never wanted to be in front of the camera when he was a kid: it's really okay for you to enjoy the work. The work is good and meaningful, and if nobody is going to watch it because of what one piece of shit did two decades ago, what was it all for? I'm not the pope of chilitown, so take this for what it's worth: I believe that when some piece of art is deeply meaningful to a person, for whatever reason, that art doesn't belong to the person who created it, if it ever did. It belongs to the person who found something meaningful in the art. If it feels right to you to put it away and never look at it again, that's totally valid. But if it brings you comfort, or joy, or healing, or just warm familiarity to bring it out and spend some time with it, that's totally valid, too. I've written a lot of words. I hope some of them make sense and are helpful to you." upload.wikimedia.org As with practically everything in this world, the question of whether art can or should be separated from the artist is complex. It involves philosophical questions about the nature of art—where it comes from and who it belongs to—as well as questions about how imperfect a person has to be for us to reject everything they create. Wheaton's response feels right, especially when we're regarding art that is collaboratively created. This article originally appeared on 10.16.21
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

Rewrites and renunciations: The story of Radiohead’s rejected James Bond themes
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

Rewrites and renunciations: The story of Radiohead’s rejected James Bond themes

“A spectre of my mortal soul.” The post Rewrites and renunciations: The story of Radiohead’s rejected James Bond themes first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

Finding the ultimate hypnotic muse in Glass Beams
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

Finding the ultimate hypnotic muse in Glass Beams

"Pure awareness and ecstatic freedom." The post Finding the ultimate hypnotic muse in Glass Beams first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Nostalgia Machine
Nostalgia Machine
1 y

‘Jeopardy!’: Fans React to 10 Major Changes From Alex Trebek’s First Episode, 40 Years Later
Favicon 
www.remindmagazine.com

‘Jeopardy!’: Fans React to 10 Major Changes From Alex Trebek’s First Episode, 40 Years Later

Trebek started hosting the game show on September 10, 1984 — but the gameplay, set, and audience reactions were very different.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 12748 out of 56669
  • 12744
  • 12745
  • 12746
  • 12747
  • 12748
  • 12749
  • 12750
  • 12751
  • 12752
  • 12753
  • 12754
  • 12755
  • 12756
  • 12757
  • 12758
  • 12759
  • 12760
  • 12761
  • 12762
  • 12763

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund