YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
29 w

FACT CHECK: Viral X Post Does Not Show Authentic Trump Statement About Arrest Related To JFK Assassination
Favicon 
checkyourfact.com

FACT CHECK: Viral X Post Does Not Show Authentic Trump Statement About Arrest Related To JFK Assassination

A viral image shared on X purports to show a Trump/Vance transition team statement ordering the Dallas Police Department to prepare for an arrest related to the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy. Hold on to your butts! https://t.co/6ba85H1mQY pic.twitter.com/mfexjWjJZq — Jeremy Rys – The ‘Alien’ Scientist – MAHA (@Alien_Scientist) November 27, 2024 Verdict: False […]
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
29 w

Police Launch Sexual Assault Investigation Against Malcolm Barrett: REPORT
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Police Launch Sexual Assault Investigation Against Malcolm Barrett: REPORT

The alleged victim said she woke up to find she was being violated
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
29 w

Browns’ Jameis Winston Asks God To Deliver Him From Pick Sixes After Disastrous Monday Night Football Performance
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Browns’ Jameis Winston Asks God To Deliver Him From Pick Sixes After Disastrous Monday Night Football Performance

Ya gotta love Jameis Winston
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
29 w

Reading The Wheel of Time: Something is Deeply Wrong With the Town of So Harbor in Crossroads of Twilight (Part 18)
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Reading The Wheel of Time: Something is Deeply Wrong With the Town of So Harbor in Crossroads of Twilight (Part 18)

Books The Wheel of Time Reading The Wheel of Time: Something is Deeply Wrong With the Town of So Harbor in Crossroads of Twilight (Part 18) Perrin and co. visit an eerie town… By Sylas K Barrett | Published on December 3, 2024 Comment 0 Share New Share This week in Reading The Wheel of Time we’ll be covering chapters 25 and 26 of Crossroads of Twilight, in which Perrin is no closer to rescuing his wife than he was when we saw him last. He is closer to running out of food, however, which means Traveling to a town where they can buy more. It’s a gross town. And a very creepy town. You don’t need Perrin’s wolf senses to tell that something is very wrong in So Harbor. But it helps. The men Perrin sent after the people from Malden have returned, but the only helpful information they were able to obtain was a map; the only people the Shaido allowed to flee were the young and the old and the sick, who were no use as gai’shain. The map was a puzzle, with its maze of streets and the lady’s fortress and the great cistern in the northeast corner. It tantalized him with possibilities. But they were possibilities only if he found a solution to the greater puzzle that was not shown on the map, the huge mass of Shaido surrounding the walled town, not to mention four or five hundred Shaido Wise Ones who could channel. So the map went back into his sleeve, and he continued to pace. Perrin has been counting the days by making knots in a length of cord, which he touches from time to time as though it can connect him to Faile. Perrin has started to rely on Berelain as one person he can talk to about missing her. He doesn’t understand what changed, exactly, but Berelain has stopped smelling like she thinks of him as prey and now only smells of sympathy. Arganda comes into the tent, looking as exhausted and haggard as Perrin feels. He has brought money from his Queen’s strongbox to add to what Perrin and Berelain have contributed, because the camp is starting to run out of food; the surrounding area has mostly been hunted clean, and the supplies they came with are very low. Perrin and Berelain are taking a party of Mayener and Tarabon soldiers, along with the Aes Sedai and their Warders, to find a town where they can buy food. Perrin is worried about leaving Arganda behind, and also about Aram, who isn’t allowed to come on this trip as punishment for getting into a fight with two Ghealdanin soldiers. Aram has become increasingly sullen and snappish, and Arganda is becoming increasingly frantic at not being able to rescue his Queen. Perrin asks Dannil to keep an eye on both of them. Masuri and Seonid are the last to join the mounted party, but as they strike out, Perrin notices movement in the trees—a watcher racing to tell Masema about their departure. When they reach the clearing where Neald and the carts and drivers are waiting, Perrin is surprised to see Balwer waiting for him. Balwer has taken all of Faile’s people under his wing since her disappearance, and has them watching and eavesdropping everywhere in the camp. He asks permission to visit “a friend” and promises to be responsible for his two companions. On the other side of the gateway, Perrin starts to notice that the countryside seems abandoned. The farmhouses are all dark, and there is snow on the road. Suddenly, Masuri spots one of the Seanchan creatures circling high above, with a human riding on its back. Everyone watches until the thing flies out of sight, but Perrin assures the others that it has nothing to do with them. The town, when they reach it, proves to be protected by massive stone walls with towers, and Perrin reflects that So Harbor would have little to fear from the Prophet’s men or any other bandits. Neald jokes that he’s relieved to see people on the walls, proving that there’s someone alive in this country, but his grin looks forced. Leaving the carts and the Two Rivers men behind, Perrin and his party ride down until they reach the walls, as Perrin tries to quell his growing unease. There is a sour smell to the air that no one else seems to notice. Gallenne calls up to the men on the walls, formally announcing Berelain, Perrin, and the Aes Sedai. It’s an impressive recital of names and titles, but when he’s finished there is a long pause. “How do we know you’re alive?” a hoarse voice shouted down at last.Berelain blinked in surprise, but no one laughed. It was fool talk, yet Perrin thought the hair on the back of his neck really was standing stiff. Something was very wrong, here. Seonid responds sternly, and after a moment the gates are opened and the stench gets immediately worse, plenty strong enough for everyone to smell it. A shifty man in filthy clothes pokes Perrin in the leg to see if he’s real, then tells them stammeringly that the Lord of So Harbor is away. He directs them to the Golden Barge where they can find the grain merchants. Perrin tells his companions that they should find somewhere else, but Berelain answers that there is nowhere else, that they are already here, and that she’s sure been to towns that smelled worse than this. Balwer quickly leads his protegés down a side street.  Perrin tells himself that it’s only imagination that makes it feel like the buildings might fall down on his head at any moment and the colors are too dim. He does notice that the village is also too quiet; there is no sound of people talking, not in the streets or the shops, and everyone seems to be hurrying away from something. When they reach the inn, Perrin, Berelain, and Annoura go inside. Despite the gilded sign and the quality of the interior, the inn is cold and dark, without even a fire in the fireplace, and the group of eleven merchants seem startled to see them. Annoura demands to know what has happened in the town, but doesn’t get an answer. The merchants brighten somewhat when they learn that their visitors are looking to buy grain and other supplies. Perrin leans against the wall and watches, having agreed to let Berelain do the negotiating. They show her samples of the grain, and Perrin notices that they aren’t bargaining as enthusiastically as Perrin is used to. Eventually, he comes over to inspect the grain himself, and the box, and declares that he wants to see the grain in the warehouses. One of the merchants, Mistress Arnon, blusters and acts offended, but Berelain chimes in that she was just about to suggest a visit to the warehouses. The merchants drag their heels, pretending to have forgotten workers to lift the bars on the warehouses, and then to have forgotten a lantern, but Perrin’s strength and Annoura’s channeling quickly overcome this difficulty. Inside smells of barley, and of rats and cats. There were always rats in grain barns, and cats to hunt them. It was comforting, and normal. Almost enough to soothe his uneasiness. Almost. He smelled something else, a smell he should know. A fierce yowl deep in the warehouse turned to rising cries of pain that died abruptly. Apparently the rats of So Habor sometimes hunted back. Perrin’s hackles stirred again, but surely there was nothing here the Dark One would want to spy on. Most rats were just rats. When Perrin cuts into one of the sacks of barley, he finds it full of weevils, despite the fact it’s too cold for the insects to live. Berelain alters her offer to the merchants to account for the quality of the goods and to ensure that the barley is winnowed before purchase. Suddenly, a man’s scream draws them back outside where they find Kireyin, one of the Ghealdan officers, who claims to have seen a man walk through the wall. Perrin thinks he might be drunk, but Seonid, who has been out looking around the town, arrives and tells him that she saw the same thing. “The dead are walking in So Habor. Lord Cowlin fled the town for fear of his wife’s spirit. It seems there was doubt as to how she died. Hardly a man or woman in the town has not seen someone dead, and a good many have seen more than one. Some say people have died from the touch of someone dead. I cannot verify that, but people have died of fright, and others because of it.” She adds that people have been striking out at anything that surprises them, occasionally killing a loved one instead of hitting something already dead. She has no idea what is happening, or why, but she wants Perrin to leave one Aes Sedai behind to help. Perrin needs every asset he has for Faile, and replies that So Harbor must face its dead alone. Privately, he thinks that even fear of ghosts doesn’t explain everything that is wrong with the town. They just did not seem to care anymore. And weevils thriving in winter, in freezing cold? There was worse wrong in So Habor than spirits walking, and every instinct told him to leave at a dead run, without looking back. He purely wished that he could. I knew it. I just knew that the ghost thing from chapter 10 was going to come back. When Elayne was visiting House Matherin, the maid Elsie thought she saw the Lord’s deceased grandmother. Elayne dismissed the girl as a ninny, but I was quite certain that someone else would be seeing ghosts before too long, because I know that Jordan never puts anything in randomly—all those little clues and moments always come back. It was quite a rollercoaster to read this section, especially for two pretty short chapters. But I really enjoyed the way the descriptions were written, and trying to puzzle out what was going on as more and more details were revealed. My initial thought was that perhaps there was some direct connection between the town of So Harbor and the area where House Matherin is, but a glance at the map showed me that House Matherin is on the wrong side of Andor and So Harbor isn’t anywhere near even being on, say, the same road or the same river. My next suspicion was that the strangeness had something to do with the Seanchan. The appearance of a raken above the party as they emerged from the gateway briefly made for a nice little red herring, and a Seanchan attack and takeover could possibly have explained the empty farmhouses and the way the man who poked Perrin’s leg stammered and licked his lips when asked about the Lord’s location. Granted, the Seanchan haven’t traditionally bothered farmers or any of the other ordinary citizenry, as long as those folks haven’t actively resisted Seanchan rule, and it’s not terribly like them to rule with fear or from the shadows, but they did recently suffer an unprecedented defeat at the hands of men who can channel. They have reasons to try sneaking around instead. And while they are (aside from the whole slavery thing) usually strict but just as rulers, if it served their interests I wouldn’t necessarily see them balking at harsh or even inhumane treatment of prisoners. (Again, the slavery thing.) The initial suspicion and wariness from the guards at the gates and the sense that the people of So Harbor were hiding something from their visitors fit with the idea that the town might have been taken by the Seanchan, perhaps for some kind of secret outpost or other maneuvering. But even before Kireyin’s sighting and Seonid’s explanation of what was going on in the town, I was already beginning to suspect something more sinister than the Seanchan. For one, Perrin’s wolf senses were clearly responding to something supernatural. There were shadows where they shouldn’t be, people seemed to be losing touch with reality, and they were also losing connection with basic self-care as well—Perrin notes that the people can’t be starving if they have grain to sell, but they still seem gaunt and unwashed. Perhaps So Harbor is becoming a sort of Shadar Logoth. Not one created by Mordeth, I don’t think, and not exactly like Shadar Logoth, but something similar. The vibes just feel very like Shadar Logoth: There’s the aforementioned shadows where they don’t belong, and the sense of unnatural rot and decay suggests that the city is eating itself from the inside. The fall of Aridhol was caused by the populace (under Mordeth’s direction) turning inward, and focusing on becoming as hard and cruel as the Shadow they hoped to defeat. In time, that cruelty also became its own Evil, as dark as, if not darker than, the Shadowspawn themselves, and manifested itself in the supernatural abilities of Mordeth and in the creation of Mashadar.  I could see something similar happening in some other town or city. For example, what would happen if  a town became focused on a sense of despair and hopelessness? We’ve seen individuals before now who have stopped caring for themselves even enough to accept money or food. These were some of the refugees affected by Rand’s ta’veren powers, Many people seem to be wandering aimlessly, like the woman with the baby that Elayne saw in the crowd in Caemlyn. If that effect was focused on many people in a single place, it might look the way So Harbor looked. Or if some person was encouraging such an attitude, the way Mordeth encouraged the hardening of Aridhol, perhaps that would have the results we’ve seen there. However, as good as that explanation seems in some respects, none of these hypotheses explains the ghosts. If that’s what they are. They certainly could be—the Heroes of Horn are basically ghosts, so we have precedent for that concept within this world. But the Heroes of the Horn are souls that are kept in Tel’aran’rhiod instead of going wherever all the other souls go after death and before reincarnation—the Creator’s hand, I guess. There is no in-between place, as far as we know, where a spirit might exist neither with the Creator nor within a living body. Why would the souls of ordinary people suddenly start showing up in the waking world when that doesn’t seem to be something that has ever happened before? I believe (though I may be misremembering) that someone saw human figures as well as monstrous ones in the mist that sprang up around the rebel camps in Cairhien when Rand was visiting them, so there may be a clue there. The bubbles of Evil seem much more dramatic, but also much more short-lived, than what is happening in So Harbor, but the town’s condition could be the lingering effects of one that appeared earlier. Or perhaps not every bubble comes on suddenly—perhaps some rise and burst very very slowly, and this is the first time one of our main characters has encountered such a one. If there were slow versions, those would be harder to recognize for what they are, anyway. I like this as a theory, because there is certainly an aspect of the Dark One’s touch in the decay-like suffering of the people of So Harbor. Rand often likened the taint to the feel and scent of midden heaps and other filth. And while that filth is also literal in this case, the real-world filth and the metaphysical filth seem to go hand in hand, in the same way that vermin and pest and carrion birds are the only animals that might be spies for the Dark One. Most are normal, just as most death and decay is normal, but the connection exists as well. The presence of so many weevils when it’s too cold for them to live also reminds me that we have seen other instances where there were vermin where they shouldn’t be. The Salidar Aes Sedai found weevils in their grain, too, despite those supplies being kept inside a Keeping, and there are rats in Tar Valon. Perhaps it isn’t that the wards and weaves are failing in a general sense, as Egwene and Alviarin both seemed to suspect. Perhaps the spoilage and infestation has something to do with the Dark One being able to touch the world more directly. He might be stepping up his game from affecting the weather to causing things to decay and rot, whether that be in food, or in people’s very minds. We also know that the Dark One gets the souls of everyone who swears to him, and that he can put those souls back into other human bodies. If he can do that, maybe he could just set them loose in the world without bodies. It is stated that people are seeing loved ones, so I don’t know if that’s too high of a percentage of Darkfriends for one town, but maybe it was already kind of a crappy place even before the ghosts. After all, it sounds like the Lord of the town murdered his wife, which doesn’t necessarily mean he’s a Darkfriend but certainly would fit if he was. The other suggestion that this might be the Dark One’s touch, and perhaps a more direct touch than we’ve seen before now, is Perrin’s observation that the colors in the town seem dim. Descriptions such as “It had to be imagination. The sky was not that gray,” feel like the inverse of a channeler’s experience of having their senses heightened by touching the True Source. Perhaps this experience of everything being more vivid isn’t because their senses are being altered, but because while they are actively holding the One Power they are much more connected, literally, to the Pattern. In the same but opposite way, perhaps the Dark One’s touch is making people less connected to the Pattern, coming between it and them and the way the taint used to stand between a male channelers and the pure flow of saidin.  Finally, we’ve seen that channeling the True Power can rip a hole in the Pattern, and we also know that using balefire can erase things from the Pattern, even to the point of causing the Pattern to start unraveling in places if it is used too much. Perhaps the Dark One’s influence has a similar effect, and he can actually tear or unravel the Pattern in some way, if he gets close enough. Even a few threads might result in some very dramatic effects on reality. Only time will tell which, if any, of these theories are heading in the right direction, but I feel pretty solidly that I’m on the right track here. Whatever is going on, I do agree with Perrin that the ghosts are only part of it, and that what’s happening in So Harbor is more than just the result of the fear of seeing dead loved ones as spirits. If ghosts were the only problem, I feel like most people would just pick up and leave—yes it’s a harsh winter, but Malden isn’t that far away, and they have guards on the walls and probably men who work as protection for the merchants. If they went in large groups they’d at least have a good chance of making it to Malden without being attacked by bandits or the Prophet’s men. Not 100%, but when the alternative is ghosts I think most people would feel willing to take those odds. It’s interesting to note that Perrin doesn’t even hesitate before deciding that he can’t spare a single Aes Sedai to help the people of So Harbor. There are innocents and children in that town, but he doesn’t even consider it; he isn’t willing to risk depleting his strength of even one Aes Sedai. I don’t know what a single Aes Sedai could do, anyway, and she would probably end up subsumed by whatever is affecting the townspeople, so as a reader I was kind of relieved that he said no. But the quickness of the decision, the fact that he doesn’t consider any alternatives or have even one guilty moment when he thinks about how he can’t save everyone no matter how much it hurts is really telling about his state of mind, and about how much Faile’s loss has changed him at least for the moment. We’ll get into this more next week, because it’s going to be very important to the choices Perrin makes. I don’t want to get ahead of myself, but that state of mind is so clear here, perhaps even clearer than when we’ve seen him pushing his people too hard or neglecting the growing problem of Aram. Speaking of Aram, I’m very worried about him. His issue is not an easy one to deal with, and I don’t really know what the answer would be, but it’s clear that he needs more from Perrin than he is getting. Perrin’s plate is full to overflowing, but I think he is more responsible for Aram than for the others who follow him because Perrin was responsible in shaping the young Tinker’s new world view. He believed that he had no right to deny Aram’s desire to fight, but he did more than not deny it. He facilitated it, provided the sword and the men to train him, and gave Aram a place among his followers. Perrin might not think of himself as a Lord or a leader, but he is both, and that slightly paternal responsibility is not something he understands, or even recognizes yet, I think. Faile did, and she was able to help balance things with Aram, at least to an extent. Without her, Aram seems to be deteriorating rapidly. Granted, so is Perrin. In some ways, it seems that the narrative is building a parallel between them; Perrin wasn’t ever a follower of the Way of the Leaf, but he has always been pacifistic in nature. He abhorred violence when he first had to engage with it, and struggled with whether or not it was morally okay for him to choose fighting. He eventually felt that it was necessary, as did Aram, but choosing violence is not the end of that journey. It is the beginning. Next week we will see Perrin reach a crossroads in his journey toward understanding his own violence, and I suspect that Aram may reach his own crossroads soon, as well. And I worry for both of them. I’m also very curious about what conflict exists between Annoura and Berelain. And I share Perrin’s confusion over Berelain’s change in attitude towards him. I understand that she doesn’t want to distract him further when he’s already at the breaking point, and she seems to have a sense of morality around her pursuit of him that deems it unfair to chase him when Faile’s not there to fight back. Or maybe she’s just realizing how deeply Perrin loves Faile, and how nothing Berelain can do will change that. Just one chapter next week, chapter 27, because it’s such a momentous one that I need a whole post just to talk about one moment. You know the one.[end-mark] The post Reading The Wheel of Time: Something is Deeply Wrong With the Town of So Harbor in <i>Crossroads of Twilight</i> (Part 18) appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
29 w

Women Shouldn’t Be in Combat Roles
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Women Shouldn’t Be in Combat Roles

It’s amazing how controversial common sense is these days. Look at the reaction to Pete Hegseth‘s comments about women in combat roles. President-elect Donald Trump wants Hegseth to be his secretary of defense. He served in the Army National Guard, deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan. He’s talked repeatedly about the problems he sees in today’s woke military. “We should not have women in combat roles,” Hegseth said on a podcast in November. “It hasn’t made us more effective. Hasn’t made us more lethal. Has made fighting more complicated.” That wasn’t a popular opinion with the propaganda press. “Pete Hegseth’s remarks about women in combat are met with disgust and dissent,” NBC News said. “Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin gave an impassioned defense of women in combat,” ABC News reported. What a shocker that the woke military establishment wants women in combat. Here’s why Hegseth is right. First, it’s important to define terms. Hegseth isn’t saying women shouldn’t be in the military or even combat. In the modern battlefield, cooks and IT specialists also may need to start shooting. Many women have performed valiantly under fire. Hegseth is referring to certain physically demanding jobs, like infantry and special operations. Next, this issue is a part of a larger debate—whether the differences between men and women are innate or societally imposed. “The new woman revealed by this scientific data is as strong, strategic, and smart as anyone else,” states the blurb for the book “Inferior: How Science Got Women Wrong—and the New Research That’s Rewriting the Story.” Many people agree. “Among those who see differences between men and women, there is little agreement about whether these differences are mostly based on biology or on societal expectations,” Pew Research reported in October. If the differences between men and women were imposed by society, it’d be much less concerning to have women in combat roles. They aren’t. Just look at how mediocre male athletes dominate women’s sporting events. Or consider the Army Combat Fitness Test, which consists of six events. The Army originally wanted the test to be sex-neutral. But too many women failed, so the Army instituted lower scores for women. For instance, an 18-year-old man has to dead-lift 340 pounds three times for max points. For an 18-year-old woman, it’s 210 pounds. These physical strength differences matter in combat. In 2015, the Marines put out a study comparing male squads with mixed-sex ones. The all-male teams were faster on 69% of tasks. The squads with women were faster on 1.5% of tasks. The all-male squads “were faster than the gender-integrated squads in each tactical movement,” the study found. Also, women were more than twice as likely to suffer a “musculoskeletal injury.” A handful of exceptional women likely can meet the minimum physical standards for these demanding combat roles. The military still shouldn’t allow them in. For one, if sex-neutral standards produce few qualified women, leftists will push to lower those standards. It already happened in the Army’s Ranger training. More fundamentally, men act differently when there’s a woman in the group. That’s especially true when the men are 18 to 24, full of testosterone, and the woman is attractive and physically fit. Romantic relationships inside a unit are distractions that hurt morale and cohesion. The military routinely discriminates in ways society wouldn’t tolerate in other jobs. If you are too fat, old, or slow, you can get kicked out. That’s permitted—even encouraged—because the military should prioritize its ability to kill people and break things. Having women serve in combat roles makes the military less lethal, so women shouldn’t serve in combat roles. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Women Shouldn’t Be in Combat Roles appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
29 w

Identity Politics, Not Biden, Cost Democrats the Election
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Identity Politics, Not Biden, Cost Democrats the Election

With his presidency ending in a few weeks, Joe Biden’s legacy is only getting messier. For many Democrats, he’s the man to blame for returning Donald Trump to the White House. If only Biden hadn’t selfishly run for reelection, the story goes, Kamala Harris would have had time to mount a better campaign—or maybe the party could have had a proper primary contest to find somebody, anybody stronger than Biden or Harris. The trouble with that theory is that Democrats haven’t won a presidential election without Biden on the ticket since 1996. Perhaps Barack Obama didn’t really need Biden as his running mate in 2008 and 2012; yet he needed someone for the No. 2 slot, and he evidently thought Biden the best thing available. Democrats at the time should have pondered what that said about their talent pool. If they’d done so, they might have avoided the mistake that really set them up to lose this year—a mistake named Kamala Harris. Elite Democrats knew perfectly well Biden was already showing his age, then 77, when he won the 2020 nomination, but at the height of COVID-19 lockdowns, his lack of cogency and energy wouldn’t be noticed on the campaign trail—because there wouldn’t be a campaign trail. If Biden was the best the party could field at the ticket’s top, though, what was left below him? By making Biden his veep, Obama had missed the chance to elevate a leader from his own generation. And Hillary Clinton, hell-bent on having the White House for herself, sucked all the air out of the 2016 primaries, leaving only enough oxygen for Bernie Sanders to challenge her from the Left—which the then-75-year-old Vermont democratic socialist did surprisingly well. Senior Democrats in effect prevented the next generation of leadership from being born—perhaps a fitting thing for a party so fiercely dedicated to abortion. What they had in lieu of fresh presidential material was identity politics. So, fully aware Biden wasn’t fit to be a two-term president, Democrats accepted Harris as his running mate. Her qualification as Biden’s heir apparent wasn’t that she was popular with voters: On the contrary, she never made it to the first primary in her bid for the 2020 nomination, so pathetic were her polls. Nor did Harris represent, like Sanders, an ideological force within the party; her opportunism was already transparent long before she turned repudiating her own words and past policies into the hallmark of her ’24 campaign. What argued for making her Biden’s running mate was simply her race and sex. After all, the central message of Clinton’s campaign four years earlier had been that a woman deserved to be president. How could a party that ran on that not put any woman on its ticket next time? Yet it was also the year of George Floyd, and the party of Black Lives Matter couldn’t afford not to take color into consideration as well. Harris wasn’t popular, she wasn’t principled, but she was ambitious—and she ticked the right boxes. Yet when a party selects candidates this way, it can’t be surprised that it loses, especially after Clinton had already proved identity politics wouldn’t beat Trump. Elite Democrats may blame Biden now, but the truth is they knew all about his condition and still preferred to have him run again rather than risk the party’s fortunes on Harris. There was no one else: The choice was Biden or Harris, and until his debate meltdown—and for some time afterward, in fact—Democratic insiders saw Biden as obviously the stronger candidate. The party sealed its fate in 2020 when it elevated Harris for reasons having nothing to do with electability. Yet Democrats put their philosophy to the test: If race and gender preferences are needed in higher education and corporate America to right the wrongs of racism and sexism, isn’t it all the more important those wrongs be righted with preferences at the highest level, that of presidential politics? But trying to do that landed Democrats with a substitute for Biden who couldn’t win, even with the media branding her opponent an outright fascist. Harris’ campaign has revealed its internal polling never showed her ahead. Biden, Harris, Clinton, and Obama led Democrats to a dead end. To escape, the party will have to rethink its identity politics—but given Trump’s gains with black men and Latinos, Democrats may fear any retreat from affirmative action will unravel their already fraying coalition. By rejecting Harris and electing Trump, however, the nation’s voters—of both sexes and all colors—sent Democrats a clear message. The question is whether they’re willing to hear it. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Identity Politics, Not Biden, Cost Democrats the Election appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
29 w

Trump to Trudeau: If You Don't Like Tariffs, Canada Can Become 51st State...
Favicon 
hotair.com

Trump to Trudeau: If You Don't Like Tariffs, Canada Can Become 51st State...

Trump to Trudeau: If You Don't Like Tariffs, Canada Can Become 51st State...
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
29 w

How Many People Descended From Genghis Khan?
Favicon 
www.iflscience.com

How Many People Descended From Genghis Khan?

Love him or loathe him – and there are plenty of reasons for both – Genghis Khan was undeniably one of the most impressive figures in world history, yet he’s somehow most famous today for his sex life.
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
29 w

If You Find These Walnut-Like Growths On Your Xmas Tree "Don't Bring Them Inside"
Favicon 
www.iflscience.com

If You Find These Walnut-Like Growths On Your Xmas Tree "Don't Bring Them Inside"

"They were on the tree branches and then they just started running."
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
29 w

'F*** The Norms' Vs. 'Guy Committed Crimes': Late Night Struggles With Hunter Pardon
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

'F*** The Norms' Vs. 'Guy Committed Crimes': Late Night Struggles With Hunter Pardon

The men of late night comedy struggled on their Monday shows to reconcile their support for President Joe Biden and his decision to pardon his son, Hunter. Some hosts decided to make the story about Republicans, while others made more “Biden is old” quips, while others welcomed the news, but hoped Democrats would apply the logic behind it to ordinary people too. CBS’s Stephen Colbert declared on The Late Show, “I don't know if that was the right thing to do, but you certainly earned that ‘World's Greatest Dad’ mug.” Colbert also theorized that “this pardon proves that with less than two months to go, Joe is officially out of malarkeys. And by 'malarkys,' I mean “[bleep].” I say he should go full bucket list. Just pardon everybody. Just load up those pardons to a nerf machine gun and go pop, pop, pop. Just hit 'em all. Pardon all the Jan 6 people before Trump can do it. That would really burn him up.”      Alluding to the idea Trump may target him, Colbert suggested, “You know what would really be funny, this would be really funny, if Joe pardoned, like, every late night host! And, just because I think it would be a funny bit, I would accept the pardon.” As for the pardon itself, Colbert came close to crossing the line of criticizing Biden, but ultimately stopped just short, "The language is so broad that experts say we haven't seen a pardon as sweeping as Hunter Biden's in generations. So, it's less of a blanket pardon and more of a tarp. Now, one reason some people are upset is that Biden reversed his long-standing pledge not to use his presidential powers to protect his son and I get why they'd be angry. Does Biden's word mean nothing? Can we trust anything he says? When he goes, ‘I'm serious, folks, I'm not kiddin' around. No joke.’ Was he, in fact, kiddin' around, yes joke?" Colbert left it there, but over at ABC, Jimmy Kimmel declared, “In other words, the Biden presidency has now entered the ‘Grandpa doesn't give a damn about what you think’ phase. Biden said he arrived at the decision to pardon Hunter over the weekend. The Bidens went to church in Nantucket on Saturday. At one point during the mass, Hunter turned to his father, he said, 'Dad, did you hear what the priest said about forgiveness?'"  Turning to conservative reaction to the news, Kimmel introduced a montage of various conservative media personalities and GOP politicians, “And of course, the right-wing media is going so nuts over this, you'd almost think they got a tape of Biden calling Georgia asking for 11,000 votes.”     Kimmel also struggled to reconcile his apparent belief Hunter should not have been pardoned with his party loyalties, “Everyone who voted to let a 34-time convicted felon off the hook is very mad about Joe Biden letting his son off the hook. And, by the way, I don't necessarily disagree. The guy committed crimes, but let's take a stroll through reality here. Not only did Trump pardon his son-in-law Jared's dad, who went to prison for hiring a hooker to frame his own brother-in-law, this weekend he named that same man U.S. ambassador to France. And yes, Joe Biden did say he wasn't going to pardon Hunter. But to be fair, there's a very good chance he doesn't remember saying that. Of course, Trump moved on this news like a bitch.” Over at The Daily Show on Comedy Central, Monday host Jon Stewart acknowledged the hypocrisy, but sought to downplay it, “But you know what, ladies and gentlemen, hypocrisy isn't illegal, nor is it particularly unusual in politics. It's not like he's ever going to run again. So why not take care of your kid, even if you said you weren't gonna? I respect it. I don't have a problem with it. The problem is, the rest of the Democrats made Biden's pledge to not pardon Hunter the foundation of their defense of America, this grand experiment.     Part of the problem with people like Stewart and Kimmel is they think history began with Donald Trump, “Look, man, the Democrats made this case an example of why Americans should believe in our system. And it is hard. Democrats have the tougher road of defending our institutions and systems as being flawed but still valuable. Republicans just run on blowing this shit up. But at every turn, Democrats keep getting caught creating a purity test they can't seem to pass themselves.” Stewart concluded by urging Democrats to expand on the reasoning behind the Hunter pardon, “The distance between the systems Democrats say they are revering, and the one that they're using when they need to is why people think it's rigged. Use the rules, use the loopholes, [bleep] the norms, but also use it to help the people! Not just those people related to you! All of us are somebody's son or somebody's daughter! And we all need that break too.”     Finally, over at NBC and The Tonight Show, Jimmy Fallon quipped, “Yeah, Biden went back on his long-standing pledge to not use his presidential powers to protect his son. In Biden's defense, there's a 99 percent chance that he forgot he said that.” Fallon’s NBC colleague, Late Night's Seth Meyers, has the week off.  Here are transcripts for the December 2 shows: CBS The Late Show with Stephen Colbert 12/2/2024 11:37 PM ET STEPHEN COLBERT: With Thanksgiving behind us, we are now strapped to a runaway sleigh, careening toward Christmas Junction, and one family opened their gifts a little early this year, because yesterday, Joe Biden gave a full pardon to his son Hunter. You go, Joe. You go! I don't know if that was the right thing to do, but you certainly earned that "World's Greatest Dad" mug. Now, Biden announced it last night, right, he announced it last night, but technically, he snuck Hunter's pardon in last week while he was doing the turkeys.  I think this pardon proves that with less than two months to go, Joe is officially out of malarkeys. And by 'malarkys,' I mean “[bleep].” I say he should go full bucket list. Just pardon everybody. Just load up those pardons to a nerf machine gun and go pop, pop, pop. Just hit 'em all. Pardon all the Jan 6 people before Trump can do it. That would really burn him up.  Or, you know what would really be funny, this would be really funny, if Joe pardoned, like, every late night host! And, just because I think it would be a funny bit, I would accept the pardon.  Now, this pardon doesn't just cover the charges Hunter is currently facing but also "Offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024."  Coincidentally, that's also the window of time for the Comcast guy to arrive. The language is so broad that experts say we haven't seen a pardon as sweeping as Hunter Biden's in generations. So, it's less of a blanket pardon and more of a tarp.  Now, one reason some people are upset is that Biden reversed his long-standing pledge not to use his presidential powers to protect his son and I get why they'd be angry. Does Biden's word mean nothing? Can we trust anything he says? When he goes, "I'm serious, folks, I'm not kiddin' around. No joke." Was he, in fact, kiddin' around, yes joke?" *** ABC Jimmy Kimmel Live! 12/2/2024 11:41 PM ET JIMMY KIMMEL: Now, I am not a presidential historian, but I believe this is the first time a U.S. president has pardoned both his son and a turkey in the same week. Biden released a statement saying that the charges in Hunter's case were politically motivated and that his son was "selectively and unfairly prosecuted." In other words, the Biden presidency has now entered the "Grandpa doesn't give a damn about what you think" phase. Biden said he arrived at the decision to pardon Hunter over the weekend. The Bidens went to church in Nantucket on Saturday. At one point during the mass, Hunter turned to his father, he said, "Dad, did you hear what the priest said about forgiveness?"  And it was done. I wonder if Joe now has to get Hunter anything for Christmas? This is good enough, right? And of course, the right-wing media is going so nuts over this, you'd almost think they got a tape of Biden calling Georgia asking for 11,000 votes. JEANINE PIRRO: Joe Biden has lied to us from the get-go. AINSLEY EARHARDT: You lied to us. KAT CAMMACK: He has now graduated to the liar-in-chief. CHARLES PAYNE: It's a true travesty against everybody in this country. THOMAS DUPREE: This is just total disrespect for the rule of law. KISA MCCLAIN: Hypocrisy at its best and a threat to democracy. KAYLEIGH MCENANY: Melania Trump has her closet raided by Merrick Garland's DOJ and then Biden's White House pardons his son. People see the disparity. CHARLES MARINO: This whole thing stinks. CHRIS ALONZO: I woke up today, I am absolutely furious with this. MARK ALFORD: He and his family are so full of slime that Nickelodeon is going to sue for trademark infringement. KIMMEL: Good one. I bet you haven't used that joke 55,000 times. This is-- they have to be kidding, right? Everyone who voted to let a 34-time convicted felon off the hook is very mad about Joe Biden letting his son off the hook. And, by the way, I don't necessarily disagree. The guy committed crimes, but let's take a stroll through reality here. Not only did Trump pardon his son-in-law Jared's dad, who went to prison for hiring a hooker to frame his own brother-in-law, this weekend he named that same man U.S. ambassador to France.  And yes, Joe Biden did say he wasn't going to pardon Hunter. But to be fair, there's a very good chance he doesn't remember saying that.  Of course, Trump moved on this news like a bitch. He wrote, "Does the pardon given by Joe to Hunter include the J-6 hostages, who have now been imprisoned for years?" No, it doesn't. But it'd be pretty funny if it did, right? "I hereby pardon my son, Hunter, and what the hell, the Q-Anon Shaman too!" *** Comedy Central The Daily Show 12/2/2024 11:08 PM ET JON STEWART: But you know what, ladies and gentlemen, hypocrisy isn't illegal, nor is it particularly unusual in politics. It's not like he's ever going to run again. So why not take care of your kid, even if you said you weren't gonna? I respect it. I don't have a problem with it. The problem is, the rest of the Democrats made Biden's pledge to not pardon Hunter the foundation of their defense of America, this grand experiment. … Look, man, the Democrats made this case an example of why Americans should believe in our system. And it is hard. Democrats have the tougher road of defending our institutions and systems as being flawed but still valuable. Republicans just run on blowing this shit up. But at every turn, Democrats keep getting caught creating a purity test they can't seem to pass themselves. … Rules, loopholes, and norms! The distance between the systems Democrats say they are revering, and the one that they're using when they need to is why people think it's rigged. Use the rules, use the loopholes, [bleep] the norms, but also use it to help the people! Not just those people related to you! All of us are somebody's son or somebody's daughter! And we all need that break too. *** NBC The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon 12/2/2024 11:37 PM ET JIMMY FALLON: Yeah, it was a big shopping weekend and millions of people got great deals, but nobody got a better deal than Hunter Biden. That's right. Last night, president Biden announced that he's pardoning his son, Hunter. Democrats are divided. Some of them are upset, while others are Hunter Biden.Yeah, both Republicans and Democrats are upset. It's kind of nice. It's like for his last act as president, Biden united the country. Isn't that nice? Yeah, Biden went back on his long-standing pledge to not use his presidential powers to protect his son. In Biden's defense, there's a 99 percent chance that he forgot he said that.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 1435 out of 56666
  • 1431
  • 1432
  • 1433
  • 1434
  • 1435
  • 1436
  • 1437
  • 1438
  • 1439
  • 1440
  • 1441
  • 1442
  • 1443
  • 1444
  • 1445
  • 1446
  • 1447
  • 1448
  • 1449
  • 1450

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund