Officials in Pierce County, Washington State, have announced that a woman who initially refused to be treated for tuberculosis (TB), even spending three months evading the police in order to do, has successfully been cured of the disease.Staff from the local health department had been attempting to persuade the Tacoma resident, known only as V.N., to get treated for a TB infection for well over a year. Under most circumstances, people have the right to refuse medical treatment, but in Washington, it’s a different matter when it comes to TB.“State code directs us to prevent the spread of tuberculosis,” explained Tacoma-Pierce County Health Officer James Miller in a blog post. “In the unusual situation in which a patient refuses to isolate, we have a legal responsibility to take steps to protect community health. Occasionally, that can include seeking a court order to persuade patients to isolate,” he continued, noting that such an approach is used as a very last resort.A court order was given out to the woman and renewed several times, until in March 2023, a judge found the woman in contempt of court and issued a civil arrest warrant.The story didn’t end there though – V.N. managed to avoid custody for three months, even taking a bus trip to a local casino. Eventually, however, law enforcement agents caught up with her, and she was taken to Pierce County Jail.There, said Miller, “she realized how serious her situation was and decided to treat her illness.”TB is a serious illness that primarily affects the lungs and can be fatal when left untreated. In fact, it’s the world’s most deadly infectious disease, killing 1.5 million out of the 10 million people it infects around the globe each year.While it’s more often seen in low- and middle-income countries, cases of TB in the US have been increasing every year since 2020, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In Washington, an average of four people are diagnosed with TB per week.The disease is, however, curable (and preventable). Though some drug-resistant forms of TB exist and take a little longer to treat, many infections can be tackled with a one to six-month course of four different antibiotics.Having spent the last year in custody receiving such treatment, V.N. has now been successfully cured of TB.“With her family’s help, our disease investigators earned her trust. She began to take her medication and regained her health over time,” said Miller. “She’s tested negative for tuberculosis (also called TB) multiple times. She gained back weight she’d lost and is healthy again.”

As an undergraduate at the University of New South Wales, Dr Erica Barlow picked up a rock that would change her life, and quite possibly how we see the history of life on Earth. It took a long time to work out what she had, however, and even today no one can be sure the rock contains what Barlow and others suspect.Barlow was in Western Australia's Pilbara region to study stromatolites, some of the oldest fossils we know. The trip involved many long walks between the campsite and the fossils; on one journey back Barlow noticed a shiny black rock catching the setting Sun against the region’s famous red dirt. She picked it up as a reminder of the trip. “I kept it on my desk as a kind of pet rock while I wrote my [honors] thesis,” Barlow said in a statement.Barlow was still working on stromatolites when her supervisor, Martin Van Kranendonk, noticed the rock and identified it as black chert. Kranendonk told her black chert has been known to hold microfossils from early in life’s development on Earth, (although this is debated) and suggested she check it out. Buried in her thesis, Barlow needed some encouragement to take the time to prepare and examine a sample, but was astonished when she did.One of the specimens Barlow found showing some of the complexity.Image credit: Erica BarlowFossils in the chert looked like nothing Barlow had seen before. Moreover, no one else had seen anything like them either. Given the chert’s age, if there were any microfossils inside they were expected to be of single-celled organisms. The microfossils Barlow had found look more like a soccer ball: almost round, but with a complex outline and an internal honeycomb structure.“There was nothing else like the microfossil I found in the geological record,” Barlow said. The closest living analog for what Barlow found appears to be certain algae, such as this sample of Volvocacean coenobial, showing hollow structures surrounded by hair-like flagella, which are both encircled by a thick, gum-like substance called mucilage.Image credit: Antonio GuillénThat’s a big claim under any circumstances, but considerably bigger when the chert was thought to date back long before complex life was thought to have appeared.The stromatolites Barlow had been studying involve thousands of cells that collectively form layered structures out of their own bodies and sand. However, they are not what we consider complex life.As far as anyone knew, the first complex life forms were hundreds of millions of years younger than this discovery. Barlow’s find might be a predecessor of the eukaryotes, the branch of the tree of life that includes all animals, plants, fungi, and algae. Or it might be an evolutionary dead-end, an early flowering of complexity that was snuffed out. Then again, it might be just an illusion, mimicking complexity in some way we can’t explain.There was only one thing for it – make the rock the subject of her PhD.First Barlow needed to know if the chert was unique. Returning to the collection site answered that almost immediately. Barlow found a rock wall dotted with thousands of black chert nodules 30 meters (100 feet) up a nearby slope. Like the Pilbara itself, the wall stretched out of view in both directions.  Barlow told IFLScience she has since measured the formation at 12 kilometers (7 miles) long, all laden with chert nodules averaging 20 centimeters (8 inches) wide and 7 centimeters (3 inches) high.It's a thin line through the vastness of the Pilbara, but the chert-containing formation stretches out of view.Image credit: Erica BarlowMany chert samples appear to contain no fossils at all. Others hold organisms that look like those found worldwide from this time – “either long thin filaments or unicells – like bubbles,” Barlow told IFLScience. A scientist who collected a small sample could easily go home thinking there was nothing unusual.Aware of the potential significance of her discovery, however, and the need to replicate it, Barlow collected hundreds of samples. Back in Sydney she found several contained specimens resembling her original, with some even having amber spheres within the honeycomb shapes. She has now expanded the specimens to 19, including half a dozen from a single rock. Barlow’s hundreds of samples also contain some that might have originally looked similar, but are too degraded for her to be sure. If she’d picked up one of these instead, she would probably not have recognized its value.The formation is not primarily black chert, but the modules are not hard to find.Image credit: Erica BarlowThe chert samples are clearly of the same age, and independent testing verified they all formed about 2.4 billion years ago. Crucially, that coincides with the date geologists have now settled on – after much debate – for the Great Oxidation Event. This is the point where oxygen levels in the atmosphere and the oceans grew so dramatically that it became possible to breathe, opening the door to complex life.Previously there had been an unexplained gap of around 750 million years between oxygen becoming available and the first eukaryote fossils, demonstrating something was taking advantage of it.Unfortunately, however, none of the specimens Barlow has found can be proven to be predecessors of eukaryotes.“When you’re working with material from this time, it’s really hard to prove or disprove something like this, because we just don’t have enough information preserved,” Barlow said in the statement. Geneticists date the timing of major advances in life using “molecular clocks”, but Barlow told IFLScience these produce “a huge range of estimates” for the time when eukaryotes emerged. Some of these are close to the age of her chert, but others are hundreds of millions of years later. “One problem is molecular clocks are informed by fossil record, which makes it a bit grey when you look back this far, where the fossil record is so patchy,” she said.There are 6-700 million years represented by a handful of sites on the planet.Dr Erica BarlowTheoretically, chemical analysis might provide valuable evidence. “If we can identify the type of carbon, it might tell us what the organism ate,” she said, potentially proving its complexity. However, this is nearly impossible because samples are so easily contaminated with carbon from the modern world.“Working with such tiny fossils, with so little carbon, if we got a positive result the [scientific] community would not believe it because of possibility of contamination,” Barlow told IFLScience.Some future technology might improve the process, but in the meantime Barlow’s work has struggled to get recognition. The remoteness of the location might be part of the problem. When the oldest animals were found in the Ediacaran Hills in South Australia, many palaeobiologists refused to believe they were real until they saw them personally. The location made that a slow process.If similar fossils were found elsewhere in the world it might help Barlow’s case, particularly if something somewhat later showed signs of further development. So far, nothing has turned up. Barlow admitted to IFLScience this could be the only evidence of an early experiment with complexity that was snuffed out, and did not reoccur for a long time.On the other hand, the lack of another location is not entirely surprising given how few sites preserve fossils more than 1.6 billion years old. “There are 6-700 million years represented by a handful of sites on the planet,” Barlow told IFLScience. It’s not easy to preserve a fossil site, but Barlow thinks such an extreme shortage may be a consequence of the state of plate tectonics at the time.If these specimens are ancestral eukaryotes, they wouldn’t have looked very exciting by modern standards. “From what we can tell, the life would have been soft, squishy and gooey – kind of like slime that you see at the edge of a pond,” Barlow said in the statement. Nevertheless, Van Kranendonk noted the similarity to modern eukaryotic algae,While Barlow waits for something to break that could help us learn more about her discovery, she has completed a postdoc with NASA in the marvellously named Laboratory for Agnostic Biosignatures. There she tried to design ways to identify life on other worlds if it doesn’t look like Earth-life; she might have had about the best training that exists for such a task.Barlow’s most recent study on the discovery is published open access in Geobiology. 

Gag me with an iPhone! Morning Joe opened Friday's show with a clip of Kamala Harris acting surprised as she was handed a phone, only to find it was -- what a shock! -- Barack and Michelle Obama on the line, expressing their endorsement! That was about as authentic as Kamala's laugh. You'll hear Kamala enthuse: "aww: you're both together"—as if she hadn't been entirely aware in advance that such would be the case! Substitute host Jonathan Lemire vouched for the Obamas' enthusiasm for Kamala, saying: "There had been some chatter on the right, nonsensical, that the Obamas were having doubts about the Vice President. That could not be further from the truth." And Lemire knows that how?  He was presumably alluding to this New York Post article, which reports that Obama "doesn’t think she can beat Donald Trump." And as National Review noted, after Biden dropped out: "Obama expressed confidence in Democratic leaders’ ability to 'create a process from which an outstanding nominee emerges' but pointedly declined to endorse Harris." Lemire himself noted that Obama didn't endorse Kamala when others were doing so, to give room for "a process for somebody else to get in the race." If Obama hadn't had doubts about Kamala, why would he have wanted to make it easier for someone else to challenge her? So spare us, Jonathan Lemire, your claim that it is "nonsensical" to suggest that Obama isn't confident about Kamala's ability to win. He also insisted "I think also the Obamas wanted to give room to President Joe Biden. He, of course, a friend. And yes, the Obamas behind the scenes certainly had concerns about his ability to win, but after Biden dropped out, they wanted to give him a little more space." As Mark Halperin has mentioned on his 2Way Zooms, the MSM's all-in backing of Harris will be worth billions of dollars in advertising. Morning Joe's highlighting at the top of the show this blatantly staged phone-call endorsement is a good illustration of the liberal media's contributions in kind.   Here's the transcript. MSNBC Morning Joe 7/26/24 6:02 am EDT JONATHAN LEMIRE: We'll begin this hour with a big development in the race for president here in the United States, where former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama have officially endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president.  Here's a video released by the Harris campaign, showing the moment the Obamas called the Vice President to offer their full support. BARACK OBAMA: Kamala! KAMALA HARRIS: Hello, hi-i-i-i! MICHELLE OBAMA: Hey there. HARRIS: Aww: you're both together. Oh, it's good to hear you both. MICHELLE: I, I, I can't have this phone call without saying to my girl, Kamala, I am proud of you. This is going to be historic. BARACK: We called to say, Michelle and I couldn't be prouder to endorse you and to do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office. HARRIS: Oh, my goodness. Michelle, Barack, this means so much to me. I am looking forward to doing this with the two of you, Doug and I both, and getting out there, being on the road.  But most of all, I just want to tell you that the words you have spoken and the friendship that you have given over all these years mean more than I can express. So thank you, both. It means so much. And we're going to have some fun with this, too, aren't we? LEMIRE: Jen Palmieri, no surprise here. This was, of course, part of a coordinated roll-out of endorsements. Though there had been some chatter on the right, nonsensical, that the Obamas were having doubts about the Vice President. That could not be further from the truth.  So, no surprise, but still important. Tell us what you think this means. JENNIFER PALMIERI: Well, I think, you know, one thing that's important about it is that Mrs. Obama was on the call, right? And that the president said they're both going to do everything they can. She, yu know, politics is her husband's thing. And she's been a phenomenally effective campaigner, but it doesn't always -- she doesn't necessarily look for opportunities to spend a lot of time campaigning. But, I think, for her to be on the call, too, says how important it is to her and that she wants to help, as well. And the two of them are such a major force, and there is a, they are long-time friends. And I think that President Obama had stepped back from endorsing, as other party leaders had, to sort of give there room to be a process for somebody else to get in the race if they wanted to, but also to show that this was -- this is a real, you know, legitimate nominating process. And now you're at the point where both of the Obamas are fully able to express being on board and wanting to campaign for her. And that's going to be a huge help. LEMIRE: Yeah. And Sam Stein, I think also the Obamas wanted to give room to President Joe Biden. He, of course, a friend. And yes, the Obamas behind the scenes certainly had concerns about his ability to win, but after Biden dropped out, they wanted to give him a little more space. We also shouldn't lose sight of the history here, Sam. Where this is the nation's first black president endorsing the woman who could be the second.

With the Paris Olympics set to begin on Friday, PBS’s Amanpour and Company devoted their entire show to the games on Thursday, including a wild history lesson on the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, where The Other Olympians: Fascism, Queerness and the Making of Modern Sports author Michael Waters tried to tie Nazism with opposition to transgender ideology. As part of his history lesson, Waters touched on the Czech runner, Zdenek Koubek. Koubek was a champion female runner who would later identify as a man. It should be noted that Koubek was intersex, not transgender.     However, as CNN International’s Hari Sreenivasan claimed, not everyone was thrilled with the idea, “There's an interesting character you write about, kind of—it's sort of behind this interest in figuring out how to test athletes. His name is Wilhelm Knoll. Tell us a little bit about him. Who is he? Who was he?” After recalling the publicity around Koubek, Waters recalled, “While the public is just kind of curious about, like, okay, it's literally, like, how is it possible to move between these categories? Like what are the medical advances that, that sort of allow this, you do see this small group of sports officials who have a very different reaction. And the most prominent among them is Wilhelm Knoll, who in January 1936, writes this op-ed, essentially accusing Koubek of being a fraud and deceitful in some way.” Waters further claimed, “Knoll seemed to take issue with the fact that Koubek had been in women's sports at all. And Knoll, just for some background context, you know, he was a quite influential sports doctor in 1936. He was the head of this group of sports doctors who advised, you know, the IOC, the Track and Field Federation. This is a very early era of sports science. And so, he, just by nature of having that position, had a lot of cachet.” However, he “was also a registered Nazi at the time and he was really an ardent believer. You know, he taught at a university and he wore the brown shirt uniform to classes. And he, you know, like, separately from Koubek, he had all of these writings about how he wanted to eliminate Jewish athletes, athletes of color from sports in general. So, he just kind of has a tendency because of his belief in eugenics to push out athletes. And he saw Koubek and this possibility of transition as some kind of threat. And you know, something that needs to be weeded out.” The controversy around transgenderism and sports today relates to men competing in women’s sports, not the other way around. Women have been football kickers, competed in male golf tournaments, and played on male baseball teams, so that’s not the sports problem. However, Waters still tried to tie opposition to the “possibility of transition” to Nazism, and that is simply ridiculous. Men are men and women are women, the existence of intersex individuals do not change that.  Here is a transcript for the July 25 show: PBS Amanpour and Company 7/25/2024 HARI SREENIVASAN: There's an interesting character you write about, kind of -- it's sort of behind this interest in figuring out how to test athletes. His name is Wilhelm Knoll. Tell us a little bit about him. Who is he? Who was he? MICHAEL WATERS: Yeah, so, so Koubek transitioned -- like announced that he was transitioning gender at the end of 1935. And like I said, you know, it becomes a global news story that is written about, you know, really with this sense of curiosity about the possibilities of transition. And so, while the public is just kind of curious about, like, okay, it's literally, like, how is it possible to move between these categories? Like what are the medical advances that, that sort of allow this, you do see this small group of sports officials who have a very different reaction. And the most prominent among them is Wilhelm Knoll, who in January 1936, writes this op-ed, essentially accusing Koubek of being a fraud and deceitful in some way. And Knoll seemed to take issue with the fact that Koubek had been in women's sports at all. And Knoll, just for some background context, you know, he was a quite influential sports doctor in 1936. He was the head of this group of sports doctors who advised, you know, the IOC, the Track and Field Federation. This is a very early era of sports science. And so, he, just by nature of having that position, had a lot of cachet. He was also a registered Nazi at the time and he was really an ardent believer. You know, he taught at a university and he wore the brown shirt uniform to classes. And he, you know, like, separately from Koubek, he had all of these writings about how he wanted to eliminate Jewish athletes, athletes of color from sports in general. So, he just kind of has a tendency because of his belief in eugenics to push out athletes. And he saw Koubek and this possibility of transition as some kind of threat. And you know, something that needs to be weeded out.

Is the media coordinating with Democrats to claim that Vice President Kamala Harris was never the border czar?On Thursday, Fox News senior correspondent Peter Doocy confronted White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre over a card with talking points that is being distributed to Democrats on Capitol Hill.'Do you think that the border would be less of a talking point now if there was less migration to the border, say, if somebody had to address root causes of migration?'That card claims Harris was never "border czar," insists a "border czar" position never existed, and claims Republicans "invented" the title. She was tasked only with combating the "root causes" of migration from a small group of Central American nations, the talking points claim.And of course: The card insists that Harris succeeded at her job, whatever it actually was. — (@) “Democrats on Capitol Hill are being handed this card with talking points about the vice president and the border. Do you know who’s handing this out?" Doocy asked."I have no idea. You probably should ask her campaign," Jean-Pierre responded with a smirk.When Doocy pressed the issue, Jean-Pierre predictably blamed Republicans and Donald Trump for the border crisis. Her response, however, only provided Doocy with ammunition for a follow-up question. "Do you think that the border would be less of a talking point now if there was less migration to the border, say, if somebody had to address root causes of migration?" he asked.The question, of course, hits at the heart of the issue. Even if Harris was only in charge of the "root causes" of the migration crisis, it's clear she failed at her job because the border crisis has been a significant problem for the entirety of the Biden presidency. Unfortunately, Jean-Pierre did not answer Doocy's follow-up question. Rather, she again blamed Republicans for the problems that occurred under the watch of President Joe Biden and Harris.Meanwhile, the media's narrative about Harris — that she was never "border czar" — matches the talking points on the card.And while it's true that Harris never received the official title "border czar," no one disputed that Harris was tasked with the job of a border czar for the last three years. Only when Biden ended his re-election campaign and Harris became the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee did the media begin to claim it wasn't true. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Now that the country is being forced to take Kamala Harris seriously, as she could soon become the Democratic presidential nominee, people are dredging up her past. Dave Rubin plays an old clip from 2019 that’s resurfaced since the Harris hysteria began. According to him, it’s a perfect example of how Kamala “ is a communist [and] a socialist” and “does not believe that America is a fundamentally good place.” Resurfaced ‘The View’ Clip That Kamala Harris May Regret youtu.be “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the new darling of the party,” said Meghan McCain. “She's promoting policies like saying that every single carbon emission in the country – every car – should be eliminated within the next 11 years, everything from a 70% to 80% tax rate. Do you agree that she could possibly, in this ideology of the socialist left, could splinter your party?” “No! You know, I think that she is challenging the status quo. I think that’s fantastic,” Harris began. “You know, I used to teach … and the thing that I always loved about teaching was when you teach, it requires you to defend the premise, and it requires you to re-examine the premise and question is it still relevant? Does it have impact? Does it have meaning? And I think that [AOC] is introducing bold ideas that should be discussed,” she concluded. Dave thinks that the only reason Harris defended AOC is because she is a fellow radical socialist. “You are one of them,” he condemns. Want more from Dave Rubin?To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Though 2024 is already stuffed with solid strategy games like Manor Lords, Homeworld 3, and Songs of Silence, the year continues to be a surprisingly excellent one for the genre. The most recent strategy game to come out with positive reviews and plenty of buzz is Cataclismo, an RTS with a heavy emphasis not just on castle building and defense, but also physics interactions of the kind that make games like Besiege stand out. Now, the addition of an unexpected new sandbox mode has just been announced, making the game even better. Continue reading Beloved Steam RTS Cataclismo suddenly gets a big new sandbox mode MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best RTS games, Best strategy games, Best city-building games

A PSVR2 app has appeared on Steam, with a release date set for August 6, 2024, hinting at imminent PC support. While little is known about how the app will work, and all we have is some screenshots of the setup process, it's an exciting time for virtual reality enthusiasts after a relatively quiet period. While PSVR2 is one of the best VR headsets on paper, its restricted compatibility held it back enormously. Like its predecessor, the PSVR2 headset is soon to be PC compatible alongside the Meta Quest 3 and Valve Index, but very little is known about how this will work. Continue reading PSVR2 app appears on Steam, hints at PC compatibility date MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Steam FAQ, Steam family sharing, Steam in-home streaming

Joe Was Better? LOL! CNN Has BAD News for the Democrat Elite Hoping for BUMP With Kamala Harris (Watch)

CACKLE! Kamala Reportedly Tried to Get Tough with Netanyahu About a Ceasefire and It Did NOT Go Well