YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
2 yrs

The guitarist Eddie Van Halen called a “chameleon”
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

The guitarist Eddie Van Halen called a “chameleon”

Working in every situation. The post The guitarist Eddie Van Halen called a “chameleon” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 yrs

Democrats Can’t Stand Trump’s Constitutional Immunity
Favicon 
spectator.org

Democrats Can’t Stand Trump’s Constitutional Immunity

It was a “no-brainer” that the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) would rule that a president has absolute immunity from prosecution for “actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority,” and also has “presumptive immunity” for all official acts in general — but not for unofficial acts. (READ MORE from Dov Fischer: Dr. Jill Biden: Perfect Wife Amid the Panic of 2024) C’mon, what was the question? Was there ever any serious doubt on this one? It was so simple that even Joe Biden, who graduated 76th in his law school class of 85, would be able to figure it out if he still were able to figure anything out. Nevertheless, Dr. Jill Biden can explain it all to him anyway: “Joe, the Supreme Court was asked to decide on a few questions about presidential immunity — and they answered every single question!” The No-Brainer That Is Presidential Immunity for Presidential Actions But really. If an American president holds up a bank (as opposed to the Social Security Trust Fund or the national treasury), brandishing a pistol, yells “Let’s Go Brandish!,” while wearing a mask (whether a white Fauci N95 or an appropriately colored ivy “River to the Sea, Let’s Burn Down Our College” mask), and passes a note to the teller saying “Give me all your cash or I’ll shoot and kill you,” and then actually shoots and kills her, he is going to face the death penalty if he murdered in Texas or will be warned by District Attorney Alvin Bragg that he better not do it again if in New York. No way can a president imagine in a million years that the Supreme Court would allow him to claim “presidential immunity” after robbing a bank and killing the teller, or if raping a 12-year-old girl (or a mother of five, or a college co-ed) as if he were an illegal immigrant from El Salvador or Venezuela. On the other hand, if he makes a terribly foolish mistake and launches a war in Iraq that ends a beautiful decade of Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Iranian mullahs and ayatollahs sending hundreds of thousands to kill each other, or if he exits Afghanistan with such incompetence that 13 brave American heroes die unnecessarily, he certainly can expect political payback and maybe even impeachment, but he should not face personal criminal liability for murder. Presidents must make grave decisions on issues of life and death. Obama presided when Navy Seals whacked Osama. President Trump oversaw the eliminations of Qassem Soleimani and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. How can he be expected to face civil lawsuits, needing to defend himself in court for military-related tragedies if sued by the survivors? Even if the military kills the wrong Arab terrorist, in a case of mistaken keffiyeh, how can a president conceivably be expected to face civil liability? Likewise, if a president makes cynical taxing and spending decisions aimed at boosting his electoral standings with voters too foolish to realize they are voting against themselves, or if he acts to defund the National Guard, or makes otherwise costly and foolish decisions, the answer must be to vote him out or impeach and perhaps convict him, but not civil liability. Immunity was and is a “no-brainer.” Even if a president is an idiot — and we have had and continue to have our share of those — he must know assuredly that the law protects his decisions when made in the conclusive and preclusive context of his constitutional authority. We cannot have our presidents hemming and hawing out of fear that, if their decision is proven to be impolitic, they might go to prison. That would be Banana Republic stuff. They won’t be able to lead. They will be afraid to lead on anything, bringing about perilous paralysis even worse than we now have. Imagine if Lincoln had, hanging over his head, the possibility he could be locked up if civil charges were brought against him for going to war against the South after Fort Sumter or for suspending habeas corpus. Or that the survivors of 600,000 Civil War dead could have sued him in civil court. For acts like those, if ultimately judged ultra vires, the public’s sane and constitutional remedy is voting him out of office or demanding their representatives impeach him. It is that simple. Phony Politicians Are Screaming. Good. Of course, Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) now are screaming and threatening to overthrow the Supreme Court. Ironically, Schumer himself could have been arrested when he threatened the Supreme Court justices that they would reap and be destroyed by the whirlwind. Imagine if Ocasio could be sued in thousands of civil lawsuits brought by people in her district for costing them countless millions of lost personal income by driving Amazon out of her district when they wanted to bring in lucrative jobs that were going to pay enormously more than her constituents were earning and now are stuck with. They are phonies and the reason I sometimes hate politics even though I love so much about following it. The dishonesty and cynicism sometimes are just too much for a person who endeavors to live his life devoted to the truth. If the shoe were on the other foot, with a Clinton or Obama facing prosecution, and if a majority of Democrat-appointed Obama judges now had ruled to let them off the hook, the same Ocasio and Schumer would be praising the Court’s wise decision. Instead, they are threatening impeachment — they who opposed impeaching Mayorkas for lying under oath and knowingly breaking the laws of our land. It is because of the Schumers and Ocasios that our Founding Fathers made Supreme Court justices and all federal judges lifetime appointments so that no amount of threats of whirlwinds and impeachments could deter them from executing their constitutional duties. The Ocasios and Schumers are so despicably dishonest and phony. But it is pleasing to watch them griping, grumbling, whining, and squawking. Wait till SCOTUS overturns the Marchan-Bragg-Stormy farce. Buy your earplugs now. The post Democrats Can’t Stand Trump’s Constitutional Immunity appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
2 yrs

??? ??????? ????? ???? ?????????
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

??? ??????? ????? ???? ?????????

??? ??????? ????? ???? ????????? This is from the 2008 case: Palm Beach prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek in front of the grand jury tells Epstein victim that she committed the crime of prostution, even though she was 14 years old when Epstein molested her… pic.twitter.com/uBmvE86ila — Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) July 1, 2024
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
2 yrs

Respected Economist Warns Global Economic Bubble Now Collapsing / Deep State Planning War
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Respected Economist Warns Global Economic Bubble Now Collapsing / Deep State Planning War

from BANNED.VIDEO:  TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
2 yrs

Maria Zeee: MSM Preprogramming Of Containment Camps REVEALED
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Maria Zeee: MSM Preprogramming Of Containment Camps REVEALED

Maria Zeee: MSM Preprogramming Of Containment Camps REVEALED@zeee_media pic.twitter.com/SLF4ZvFeIE — Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 2, 2024
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
2 yrs

Biden’s Performance Exposed The Deep State Treachery While ‘Propaganda Programmers’ At The NYT Have Changed Their Tune And Are Now Calling For Him To Be Removed From The ‘Dumb And Dumber’ Presidential Ticket
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Biden’s Performance Exposed The Deep State Treachery While ‘Propaganda Programmers’ At The NYT Have Changed Their Tune And Are Now Calling For Him To Be Removed From The ‘Dumb And Dumber’ Presidential Ticket

by J.B. Shurk, All News Pipeline: I know the country’s going to hell in a handbasket.  Inflation is killing working-class families.  Illegal immigrants are raping and murdering little girls.  “Woke” corporations are pushing “transgender” madness on young children.  Public schools are telling students that they will not survive the “climate apocalypse.”  Biden and the build back better buffoons in control of Western governments are […]
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
2 yrs

The Odd Historical Origins of the Humpty Dumpty Nursery Rhyme
Favicon 
www.historydefined.net

The Odd Historical Origins of the Humpty Dumpty Nursery Rhyme

Nearly all children who grew up during the twentieth century are familiar with the nursery rhyme of Humpty Dumpty. This modern version of the short rhyme runs as follows: “Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall, Humpty Dumpty had a great fall; All the King’s horses And all the King’s men, Couldn’t put Humpty together again.” So far, the story is quite simple. But, there is a much wider story to how this nursery rhyme came into existence and developed over five or six hundred years. This is the story of the strange historical origins of the Humpty Dumpty nursery rhyme. Artist Rendition of Humpty Dumpty The Modern Origins of Humpty Dumpty Humpty Dumpty has been around for centuries, but the modern, standardized version of the rhyme is largely derived from the version published by an English publisher and organist Samuel Arnold in 1797. This ran: “Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall, Humpty Dumpty had a great fall. Four-score Men and Four-score more, Could not make Humpty Dumpty where he was before.” Slight evolutions occurred after that throughout the nineteenth century until the twentieth-century version was arrived at. Was Richard III the inspiration for Humpty Dumpty? The Humpty Dumpty rhyme can be traced back to at least the late fifteenth century and is an allusion to King Richard III. Richard III briefly reigned as King of England between 1483 and 1485 after his brother, King Edward IV, passed away. Edward was to be succeeded by his son and namesake, Edward V, but as the young Edward was a minor in 1483, Richard was chosen to serve as regent until he reached adulthood. Richard can hardly be said to have honored his brother’s faith in him and quickly placed young Edward and his younger brother Richard in the Tower of London, from where they never reappeared. The assumption is Richard had his two young nephews killed, and thereafter he usurped the throne. He did not go unchallenged in this, and Henry Tudor, a Welsh upstart, overthrew him in 1485 by defeating Richard in combat at the Battle of Bosworth Field. Richard III All of this is relevant to Humpty Dumpty because Richard suffered from scoliosis and was a hunchback. Additionally, his horse was allegedly called ‘Wall.’ So, in later years when figures such as the great playwright, William Shakespeare, wrote about Richard, they emphasized his humped back. By modern standards of ethics, it hardly seems acceptable to refer to somebody with a physical disability as ‘Humpty Dumpty,’ but this seems to have been a reference to Richard’s humped back. When the rhyme refers to him falling off of a ‘wall,’ this would seem to be a reference to his horse, which Richard is recorded as falling off of at the Battle of Bosworth Field, and the King’s soldiers and men are a reference to his forces at the battle being unable to win the day against Henry Tudor’s army. Other Possible Origins of Humpty Dumpty Richard III’s story is the most plausible origin of the Humpty Dumpty rhyme, but several others exist. Some suggest that Humpty Dumpty is a derivative of a Swedish or Germanic fairy tale character, many of which were immortalized by the Brothers Grimm and Hans Christian Andersen in the nineteenth century. There is also a plausible link to seventeenth and eighteenth-century slang terms. For instance, Humpty Dumpty was a drink consumed in Stuart-era Britain composed of a mix of brandy and ale. A 1904 adaptation of Humpty Dumpty by William Wallace Denslow. This, combined with other pejorative terms which were used at the time to refer to people of shorter stature, would suggest that at least in the eighteenth century before Arnold publicized the largely modernized version of the rhyme, Humpty Dumpty was a bawdy, insulting comedic figure of some sort which term was widely applied to people when inebriated. Humpty Dumpty and the English Civil War One final interpretation is that Humpty Dumpty was the name of a large piece of ordnance, or a canon, which was mounted on the walls of the town of Colchester in the mid-seventeenth century. During the 1640s, England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland were enveloped by a series of conflicts collectively known as the Wars of the Three Kingdoms or the English Civil War in England. Colchester was besieged during the civil war between King Charles I and the English Parliament in 1648, and Humpty Dumpty was the name of a huge canon atop the town’s walls. The Royalists, the King’s supporters, held the town while the Parliamentarians besieged it. During this, the wall which Humpty Dumpty was perched on top of was shattered by parliamentary ordnance fire, and Humpty Dumpty fell off this great wall. The King’s Men, in this interpretation, were the Royalists, who could not remount the canon and eventually, after an eleven-week siege of Colchester, were forced to surrender to the Parliamentary forces. Again, the theory that the Humpty Dumpty rhyme originates in the siege of Colchester in 1648 is speculative. What seems clear from all of this is that there is no one origin story for the Humpty Dumpty rhyme. Rather, it was a rhyme inherited from the early modern world from medieval times. Each successive generation reimagined it to suit the circumstances of their age, whether that was Richard III falling from his horse in 1485, a canon falling from the walls of Colchester in 1648, or somebody who had drank too much brandy and ale falling over in the seventeenth or eighteenth centuries. Each generation brought its interpretation to the rhyme we all know today. Sources Iona Opie and Peter Opie (eds.), The Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes (Second Edition, Oxford, 1997), pp. 213–215. Chris Skidmore, Bosworth: The Birth of the Tudors (London, 2014). Opie and Opie (eds.), Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes, pp. 213–215. Alf Thompson, ‘The Siege of Colchester, 1648: The Earl of Northampton’s Regiment Orders of the Day’, in The Sealed Knot, Vol. 32, No. 2 (April, 2000). The post The Odd Historical Origins of the Humpty Dumpty Nursery Rhyme first appeared on History Defined.
Like
Comment
Share
Bikers Den
Bikers Den
2 yrs ·Youtube General Interest

YouTube
Now that's a Chopper ?
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
2 yrs

Democrat Congressman Declares Donald Trump Will Win Election And He’s “OK With That”
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Democrat Congressman Declares Donald Trump Will Win Election And He’s “OK With That”

Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME) wrote in an op-ed for the Bangor Daily News that Donald Trump is going to win the presidential election. “After the first presidential debate, lots of Democrats are panicking about whether President Joe Biden should step down as the party’s nominee. Biden’s poor performance in the debate was not a surprise. It also didn’t rattle me as it has others, because the outcome of this election has been clear to me for months,” Golden wrote. “While I don’t plan to vote for him, Donald Trump is going to win. And I’m OK with that,” he added. Just in: Maine Democrat Congressman Jared Golden writes “Donald Trump is going to win. And I’m OK with that.” Via Bangor Daily pic.twitter.com/A8SjgKzMNa — The Calvin Coolidge Project (@TheCalvinCooli1) July 2, 2024 Dem Rep. Jared Golden in a new op-ed: “While I don’t plan to vote for him, Donald Trump is going to win. And I’m OK with that.”https://t.co/PKsfTBE8GS — Reese Gorman (@reesejgorman) July 2, 2024 Golden writes in the Bangor Daily News: This election is about the economy, not democracy. And when it comes to our economy, our Congress matters far more than who occupies the White House. Some of Congress’ best work in recent years has happened in spite of the president, not because of him. A handful of responsible Democrats, including myself and West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, rejected Biden’s bloated “Build Back Better” bill and instead passed a law that supercharged American energy production, saved Medicare billions of dollars and reduced the deficit. Years earlier, Congress stood up to the GOP establishment who tried to hijack Trump’s agenda to achieve their long-held goal of repealing the Affordable Care Act. Defeating them saved health coverage for tens of millions of Americans and protections for people with preexisting conditions. It was Congress that wrote and passed the CHIPS Act and the Inflation Reduction Act to bring back manufacturing so we can once again be a nation of producers, not just consumers. We wrote laws to unleash American energy by tapping domestic natural resources — oil and gas, biomass, the sun and wind — as well as nuclear power to ensure a steady supply of affordable, reliable energy. And we passed an infrastructure law that’s already building and improving roads, bridges and ports. In 2025, I believe Trump is going to be in the White House. Maine’s representatives will need to work with him when it benefits Mainers, hold him accountable when it does not and work independently across the aisle no matter what. Congress will need to stand up to economic elites and so-called experts in both parties who are already working overtime to stop Trump’s proposed trade policies that would reverse the harms of globalization and protect American businesses from unfair foreign competition. We need to protect from extremists the law I helped pass that caps seniors’ insulin costs at $35 and forces Big Pharma to negotiate and lower the cost of prescription drugs. Perhaps more importantly, members must stand up to the GOP old-guard who will use a Trump presidency as cover for handouts to the wealthy and powerful at the cost of America’s working families and communities. Democratic Rep. Jared Golden says he expects Trump to win the 2024 election https://t.co/OTgo1cwxTQ pic.twitter.com/SpWO7u45e1 — TheBlaze (@theblaze) July 3, 2024 In an op-Ed, Democrat Rep. Jared Golden of Maine writes: “Trump is going to win the election and democracy will be just fine. Unlike Biden and many others, I refuse to participate in a campaign to scare voters with the idea that Trump will end our democratic system.” pic.twitter.com/4k8jIo9Juh — Bad Hombre (@joma_gc) July 2, 2024 The Hill reports: Golden, like all other House lawmakers, is up for reelection this year. He will take on Maine state Rep. Austin Theriault, a Republican, in the general election this fall. Cook Political Report, a nonpartisan index, ranks Golden’s district as a toss-up. Trump carried the district by 6 points in 2020. His op-ed is a stark contrast to comments from Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who on Tuesday became the first House Democrat to publicly call on Biden to remove himself from the race. In a post on social media platform X, Theriault said Golden’s piece was “a very phony attempt to avoid accountability.” He asked Golden if he supports Biden or not and whether he believes the president is mentally competent. “He won’t say, because he puts politics ahead of Mainers,” Theriault said.
Like
Comment
Share
The First - News Feed
The First - News Feed
2 yrs ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
More Bad News for President Joe Biden
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 21957 out of 56670
  • 21953
  • 21954
  • 21955
  • 21956
  • 21957
  • 21958
  • 21959
  • 21960
  • 21961
  • 21962
  • 21963
  • 21964
  • 21965
  • 21966
  • 21967
  • 21968
  • 21969
  • 21970
  • 21971
  • 21972

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund