Last month, a Manhattan jury found former President Donald Trump guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records. But Trump's attorneys have "several paths for appeal," legal experts told Blaze News.Following the guilty verdict in late May, Trump's legal team immediately announced its plan to challenge the ruling and expressed confidence that it would be successfully overturned. "This was a verdict that we were expecting. We're going to appeal, and we're going to win on appeal," Todd Blanche, Trump's attorney, told the "Today" show after the jury's verdict was revealed. "The goal is to appeal quickly and hopefully be vindicated quickly."Blanche noted that they did not anticipate that Trump would "get a fair shake in Manhattan.""Every single person on the jury knew Donald Trump as president, as candidate, from 'The Apprentice,' so I don't accept that this was a fair place to try President Trump," he said in an interview with CNN. "The law doesn't say, 'But if you can't avoid it, tough luck.' That's not what the law says. The law says a person is entitled to a fair trial in front of a jury of their peers, and we just think that because of everything around the lead of this trial, it made it very difficult for the jury to evaluate the evidence kind of independent of what they knew coming in."Grounds for appealMike Davis, founder and president of Article III Project, told Blaze News that "Trump has several paths for appeal," including filing a substantive appeal on the merits of the case and an emergency relief from the judgment."The immediate focus should be getting a stay of the execution of the judgment," Davis explained, noting that Trump has "a very good chance" of securing an emergency petition and having his conviction reversed on appeal."The emergency petition can move very fast. That can happen before Trump actually goes to prison or is otherwise confined," he continued. "The appeal on the merits takes many, many months."Trump and his attorneys have argued that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case against the former president was "rigged," pointing to the assignments of acting Justice Juan Merchan and one of Bragg's lead prosecutors, Matthew Colangelo. In a post on Truth Social ahead of the jury's verdict, Trump called the case a "highly political, unconstitutional, and election interfering witch hunt."Merchan's daughter, Loren, is the president of a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm. Two of the company's Democratic clients have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations, according to a report from the New York Post. The clients' solicitation emails mentioned the New York case against Trump, leading the former president's legal team to argue that Judge Merchan has a conflict of interest with his daughter profiting from the case.Trump's campaign spokesperson, Steven Cheung, has called Merchan "highly conflicted."'Unprecedented republic-ending lawfare and election interference.'Merchan was also slated to preside over a criminal fraud trial against Trump's former presidential adviser Steve Bannon. CNN recently reported that a different judge will be assigned to the case because of a scheduling conflict.Criminal defense attorney David W. Fischer told Blaze News, "Trump's most salient issue on appeal is whether the outside invoices from Michael Cohen and other sources constitute 'business records' under New York law." Fischer previously explained that it is one of the most straightforward strategies for dismissing the case, and he now believes it is the best approach for appeal. "To falsify a record means to take an existing record and change it in a way that changes the character of the record," Fischer stated. "It is not the addition of a false record into a business." "The second strongest issue is that the jury was allowed to convict without being unanimous as to which federal crime they believed Trump committed," Fischer told Blaze News.As part of Merchan's jury instructions, he told the panel that they did not need to be unanimous on "whether the defendant committed the crime personally, or acted in concert with another, or both." Additionally, the jurors were told they did not have to all agree about the "unlawful" means, which could have included violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act, falsification of other business records, or violations of tax laws.Merchan told the jury, "You need not be unanimous as to what those unlawful means were ... you may consider: violations of FECA, falsification of other business records, violation of tax laws."Fischer told Blaze News that the appeals process in the New York case "will not be resolved until well into 2025."Trump referred to Colangelo, a leading prosecutor in the New York criminal trial, as a "top Democrat DOJ official," pointing to his former senior role in the Biden administration's Department of Justice. During his previous employment at the New York attorney general's office, Colangelo oversaw a lawsuit in 2018 that led to the closure of Trump's charitable organization. He was also involved in an investigation into the Trump Organization.Colangelo's move from the top-ranking DOJ position to Bragg's team in 2022 was effectively a demotion, raising concerns that the transition was politically motivated. His former position with the DOJ has sparked allegations that the Biden administration was behind Trump's prosecution in New York.A letter from the Biden administration Department of Justice obtained by the Associated Press contended that the department had nothing to do with Bragg's case.Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte wrote, "The District Attorney's office is a separate entity from the Department. The Department does not supervise the work of the District Attorney's office, does not approve its charging decisions, and does not try its cases.""The Department has no control over the District Attorney, just as the District Attorney has no control over the Department," Uriarte added.The House Judiciary Committee launched an investigation into Colangelo's appointment. In a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) demanded "documents and communication" related to Colangelo and his "hiring, employment, and termination" at the DOJ. Bragg and Colangelo will testify before the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on July 12, a day after Trump is scheduled to be sentenced in the New York criminal case, in which he faces up to four years in prison. Jordan has argued that Colangelo's appointment to Bragg's team has "given the perception that the Justice Department is assisting in" the "politicized prosecution" of Trump.Bragg's office accused the committee of spreading false information."It undermines the rule of law to spread dangerous misinformation, baseless claims, and conspiracy theories following the jury's return of a full-count felony conviction in People v. Trump," a spokesperson from Bragg's office stated. "Nonetheless, we respect our government institutions and plan to appear voluntarily before the subcommittee after sentencing."The prosecution's star witness in the case, Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen, leading up to the trial, used his platform on social media to criticize Trump and his presidential campaign and promote the sale of T-shirts bearing an illustrated image of Trump behind bars. During his testimony, Cohen admitted to earning roughly $4.4 million since he began writing books and making podcast appearances disparaging Trump. Cohen also admitted to repeatedly lying and even stealing money from the Trump Organization.Porn actress Stormy Daniels, another lead witness in the case, also made a profit from the scandal, claiming she had an affair with Trump decades ago. Daniels signed a book deal and also profited from a strip club tour dubbed "Make America Horny Again," which she testified that she did not name.Merchan placed a gag order against Trump, preventing him from speaking publicly about anyone involved in the case or their family members, with the exception of the judge and DA Bragg. Next steps for TrumpDavis told Blaze News, "Trump should absolutely file a civil lawsuit against all of these Biden Democrat prosecutors who are engaging in this unprecedented republic-ending lawfare and election interference against Trump. And state attorneys general, like in Florida, in Georgia, and elsewhere, should open criminal probes — so should the Maricopa County Attorney in Arizona. Congress should assume more aggressive oversight. And when Trump is back in office, his Justice Department on day one should open civil rights and other criminal investigations on this republic-ending lawfare by Biden and his aides and allies."Will Scharf, Trump's attorney, stated last month that the former president's legal team is "considering all options" to appeal the conviction. 'A weak legal case but a strong public relations move.'Scharf told Fox News, "This case is replete with reversible error going back to the very first day, continuing through jury instructions. Every aspect of this case is ripe for appeal. We are going to appeal as quickly as we can. We will seek expedited review of this case.""All options are on the table," he continued. "And we are actively considering all options that could lead to justice for President Trump here, because justice has not been done in this New York courtroom today."Scharf stated that Trump's legal team is considering filing a lawsuit against Bragg for "malicious prosecution," noting that he believes the case "is extraordinarily strong.""This is not a case that would have been brought against any defendant not named Donald Trump and any defendant who frankly wasn't running for president," Scharf told Fox News.Fischer told Blaze News that the potential "lawsuit against Alvin Bragg would be a weak legal case but a strong public relations move for candidate Trump."Ahead of the Thursday evening CNN Presidential Debate, Judge Merchan partially lifted the restrictive gag order against Trump, allowing him to publicly discuss the witnesses, including Cohen and Daniels. The gag order still prevents Trump from speaking about Bragg's team, Merchan's daughter, or others involved in the case.During the debate, Trump claimed that the New York case against him was President Joe Biden's way of attacking his political opponent."[Biden] basically went after his political opponent because he thought it was going to damage me," Trump stated, adding that his campaign has never generated more contributions than it did after the jury's guilty verdict. "That case is going to be appealed and won."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

We are living through the darkest period in U.S. history when it comes to our fundamental rights of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of association.In more than two centuries of free government, no administration has attempted to muzzle, jail, or perhaps even murder its principal political opponent as the current one has. Never before have lawyers been professionally ruined and criminally indicted for standing up for honest elections or the rights of political defendants. Never before has an administration worked with Big Tech allies to keep ordinary Americans from expressing and sharing their concerns and grievances about failures and corruption in high places, no matter how evidence based. Never before have some of our leading universities joined with the bureaucracy, the secret police, and the spy agencies to combat wide-ranging and well-grounded dissent.My fellow political felons, indicted and unindicted: Be of good cheer!We’re all aware of these menaces, but we need also to remind ourselves of the successes in uncovering and standing up to them. X (formerly Twitter) was liberated from the censorship-industrial complex by the largess of Elon Musk and once again provides a fair and open forum for political discussions, often informative if sometimes intemperate. Murthy v. Missouri (better known as Missouri v. Biden), a legal challenge to the core censorship partnership between the administration and Big Tech, after successes before lower courts, made it to the Supreme Court (which unfortunately then chose to evade the issue on jurisdictional grounds).COVID dissenter Alex Berenson, who played a key role in the transformation of Twitter, is marching forward in court against the Biden officials who gave that firm its censorious instructions. The Stanford Internet Observatory, which harnessed the key university in Silicon Valley against freedom of speech, has closed its doors and seemingly dissipated its personnel and resources.The increasing and spreading awareness of the sheer magnitude, dishonesty, and brazenness of this censorship is itself an important sign. The enemies of freedom have been outed. Their names and agencies are known more and more widely. And now that they are outed, they can be countered in the courts, in the press, on social media, and in the voting booth. So, too, we should take new hope from the fact that so many Americans, including many prominent critics of Trump, have rallied to his side despite the unconscionable legal warfare waged against him.So, my fellow political felons, indicted and unindicted: Be of good cheer! “This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.” Americans from the wealthy and powerful to the modest and ordinary are waking up — and waking up in time — to the destruction of their liberties the Biden administration and its deep state and Big Tech allies have wrought.Those of us who saw these dangers early must continue the alarm and reinforce the rally. The citadel of censorship still stands under its meretricious banner of “fighting misinformation,” but as one can see every hour on X, we have taken the war for the restoration of our liberties into the enemy’s country, and the friends of liberty are being joined by new allies from every political grouping.This July 4 let us draw new strength not only from our ancestors’ struggle for independence but their struggle against later armies of darkness and enslavement. This time next year, if everyone does their duty, we will raise a toast amid the ruins of the citadels of censorship that we have overthrown.

AMD has apparently slightly pushed back the availability date of its upcoming Ryzen AI 300 Zen 5 laptop CPUs, with the previously expected date of July 15 now scrapped in favor of a July 28 launch. However, while this may seem a surprising move so close to the launch date, neither the original expected date nor the newly speculated date have been officially announced or confirmed by AMD, so we can't technically consider this a delay. Whenever AMD's new gaming laptop CPUs - based on its new Zen 5 architecture and codenamed Strix Point - do actually land, we fully expect them to be used in some of the best gaming laptops when it comes to those seeking an affordable, thin and light model without a separate GPU. However, based on various new leaks, we could have a little longer to wait than originally hoped. Continue reading AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 CPU launch apparently just got delayed MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Ryzen 7 7800X3D review, Best gaming CPU, Radeon RX 7800 XT review

Steam has so many roguelikes these days that it's nigh impossible to cut through the noise. Procedural generation and permadeath mechanics are everywhere, but there's still a place for old-school, grid-based, roguelike action. With a newly announced release date that's just over the horizon, The Dark Cave looks like the perfect answer to the ever-expanding genre. Sometimes simpler is better. Continue reading Inventive grid-based roguelike sets Steam launch, you can try it now MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best card games, Best roguelike games, Best indie games

Given the alliance’s challenges, it needs real leadership at the top, not a conciliatory Eurocrat.

Progressive reaction to the Alitos’ flags has run headlong into the otherwise quaint debate over changing the state flag in Maine.

In last week’s debate, Donald Trump showed his superficial, box-checking commitment to the pro-life cause.

The leadership of Teamsters has maintained far-left values, even as Teamsters members have drifted right.

Compromising on issues such as abortion, American global leadership, the centrality of the nuclear family, and our nation’s fiscal solvency would be a mistake.

On the Good Book in public schools; Joe Biden and the 2024 campaign; Israel and Charles Krauthammer; and more.