YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
29 w

SECURITY RISK? Lawmaker Slams Dems Who Oppose NDAA’s Protections Against Military Kid Gender Transitions
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

SECURITY RISK? Lawmaker Slams Dems Who Oppose NDAA’s Protections Against Military Kid Gender Transitions

The House of Representatives voted 281-140 on Wednesday evening to approve an annual defense policy bill, the National Defense Authorization Act, that for the first time protects children of members of the military from irreversible transgender medical interventions. “We should not be funding this with our military,” Rep. Greg Murphy, R-N.C., told The Daily Signal. “We should be funding our military to keep the nation safe and secure.” The $895 billion National Defense Authorization Act includes a prohibition on the use of taxpayer funds for gender transition procedures for children who get their medical care through the military’s health care program. It prevents TRICARE, the military’s health care program, from covering specific treatment: “Medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization may not be provided to a child under the age of 18.” This is the first instance of such a restriction being enshrined in federal law. President-elect Donald Trump has promised to ban such transgender medical treatments for children without parental consent. Many progressive Democrats said they wouldn’t support the bill because of the ban on taxpayer-funded transgender medical procedures. “Blanketly denying health care to people who clearly need it, just because of a biased notion against transgender people, is wrong,” Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., said in a public statement Sunday. Murphy said Democrats such as Smith and Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., who refused to advance the bill due to “ideological riders,” are risking national security. “It’s unfortunate that they literally put to risk the security of the nation over a social justice issue that I think has really so many flaws as far as its appropriateness,” Murphy said. Murphy, a medical doctor, said it’s “ridiculous” to allow children with undeveloped prefrontal cortexes to make permanent changes to their bodies through surgeries and medications. He said this isn’t something the U.S. military should be endorsing. “We’re trying to deal with the defense and security of our country,” Murphy, co-chair of the GOP Doctors Caucus, told The Daily Signal, “and we’re dealing with a social justice issue.” Not every GOP lawmaker is on the same page, however. Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., told The Hill that he doesn’t think the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, should include such a provision. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., “didn’t talk to me about it,” Rogers said. “My preference would have been that we just let the president, on Jan. 20, deal with these, which he’s already indicated he’s going to do,” the Alabama Republican said. Passage of the NDAA with the contested provision comes as the Supreme Court considers whether states may ban transgender medical procedures for minors. In U.S. v. Skrmetti, the high court is expected to decide the constitutionality of a Tennessee law protecting kids from transgender medical interventions—sterilizing puberty blockers, hormone replacement regimens, and irreversible transgender surgeries. In a video last year, Trump, who takes office again Jan. 20, promised to “pass a law prohibiting child sexual mutilation in all 50 states.” “The left-wing gender insanity being pushed at our children is an act of child abuse,” Trump said. “Very simple. Here’s my plan to stop the chemical, physical, and emotional mutilation of our youth.” The post SECURITY RISK? Lawmaker Slams Dems Who Oppose NDAA’s Protections Against Military Kid Gender Transitions appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
29 w

Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Caitlin Clark for Her 'Sad' 'White Privilege' Pandering
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Caitlin Clark for Her 'Sad' 'White Privilege' Pandering

We have seen it many times: the mindless, reflexive recitation of a woke catechism that has no basis in reality. Still, the performance feels different now. In fact, it almost seems as if the oblivious performer has somehow traveled to our time from the recent past. Tuesday on social media...
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
29 w

Bill Clinton Gives Surprise Answer About Whether Biden Should Pardon Hillary
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Bill Clinton Gives Surprise Answer About Whether Biden Should Pardon Hillary

Bill Clinton was on The View today and was asked: “Do you think it would be wise of President Biden to preemptively pardon any potential targets? What about your wife?” It’s actually a tough question. One of those double-binds where you have trouble if you say Yes and you also have trouble if you say No. So Bill chose to defiantly say (with a straight face) that Hillary did nothing wrong! And he even got kind of mad about it. Watch here: Bill Clinton, on The View, is asked, “Do you think it would be wise of President Biden to preemptively pardon any potential targets? What about your wife?” With a straight face and everything, Clinton says, “They’ve got a problem with her because, first, she didn’t do anything… pic.twitter.com/7QLPrLG1yO — Melissa Hallman (@dotconnectinga) December 11, 2024 He went on to call it a “Fool’s Errand” to waste time trying to get even. Oh, I get it Bill…. After President Trump chose NOT to prosecute Hillary despite a mandate to “Lock Her Up” — choosing the high road instead — and then Democrats chose to spend the last 4 years applying every form of lawfare known to man against President Trump in return…..that was all ok, but now we should all just shift to “don’t waste your time trying to get even.” Pretty hilarious! The View Asks Bill Clinton If Hillary Should Be Preemptively Pardoned “It’s normally a fool’s errand to spend a lot of time trying to get even”pic.twitter.com/rpIvQp0yDR — Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) December 11, 2024 You can watch the full segment here (if you can stomach it): .@BillClinton on if his wife Hillary should be considered for a preemptive pardon: “If Pres. Biden wanted to talk to me about that, I would talk to him about it, but I don’t think I should be giving public advice on the pardon power. I think… it’s a very personal thing.” pic.twitter.com/WY1VfOwRvg — The View (@TheView) December 11, 2024 What are your thoughts? Meanwhile, people are still calling the Hunter Biden pardon unprecedented on its own: NEW: Pardon attorneys and historians confirm Biden’s pardon of his felon son Hunter, which includes crimes uncharged over an 11-year span, is the most sweeping and unconditional in US history, broader even than the Nixon pardon. Here’s the actual language:https://t.co/5lus5d4sq0 — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) December 3, 2024 Potentially creating new and even bigger challenges: Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter opens up potential new legal problems: Napolitano FULL INTERVIEW: https://t.co/OJRpLCJnBf pic.twitter.com/vyDphLyFWj — Gerald Celente (@geraldcelente) December 5, 2024 And some are seeing a new wave of sweeping, preemptive pardons may be Unconstitutional: If you go back and research the topic of Presidential pardons from the time period of Trump’s first term, there is a bunch of leftist research explaining why Biden’s apparent blanket pardon of Hunter shouldn’t and wouldn’t cover any of their Burisma quid pro quo shenanigans. https://t.co/ILwkKNVvbe pic.twitter.com/WO9jsSK0Vm — Jon Herold (@patel_patriot) December 2, 2024 The argument that President Joe Biden issuing mass preemptive pardons for everyone in his administration could be deemed unconstitutional involves several legal considerations: Scope of Pardon Power: The Constitution grants the President the power to “grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment” (Article II, Section 2). While this power is broad, it has traditionally been interpreted to apply to specific offenses known to the law. Issuing preemptive pardons for unspecified future crimes could be seen as extending beyond this traditional understanding, effectively nullifying the checks and balances inherent in the legal system. The historical precedent, such as Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon, was for specific acts related to Watergate, not for any potential future crime. Precedent and Judicial Interpretation: Legal scholars and historical precedents suggest that pardons are generally understood to apply to offenses that have already been committed or at least identified. The Supreme Court case Ex parte Garland (1866) affirmed that the power of the pardon is unlimited except in cases of impeachment but did not extend to pardons for acts not yet committed or even specified. There’s a significant difference between pardoning known offenses and creating a blanket shield for hypothetical future crimes, which could be seen as an abuse of executive power. Separation of Powers: A mass issuance of preemptive pardons could infringe on the separation of powers. By potentially immunizing his administration from judicial scrutiny, Biden would be preempting the judicial branch’s role in determining guilt or innocence. This could be interpreted as an unconstitutional expansion of executive authority, effectively allowing the President to control what should be the independent operation of the judiciary. Potential for Abuse: The argument against such pardons also rests on the potential for abuse, where future administrations might use this as a precedent to protect themselves from accountability, thereby undermining the rule of law. If every administration could preemptively pardon its members for any future legal action, it would fundamentally alter the balance of power and the accountability mechanisms established by the Constitution. Constitutional Intent: The framers of the Constitution did not explicitly provide for the use of pardons to prevent prosecution of future, unspecified crimes. The intent was likely to provide mercy or correct judicial errors for offenses already committed, not to shield administration members from potential future legal accountability. This broad application of the pardon power could be argued to contradict the spirit and intent of the constitutional design. Legal Challenges: Should such pardons be issued, they might face legal challenges where the courts would have to interpret whether this use of the pardon power aligns with constitutional principles. While no such challenge has directly tested this scenario, the implications could lead to a Supreme Court decision questioning the constitutionality based on the above arguments. In conclusion, while the President’s pardon power is broad, the issuance of mass preemptive pardons for unspecified future actions could be seen as stretching this power beyond its intended scope, potentially nullifying legal accountability and thus infringing on the separation of powers and the rule of law established by the Constitution.
Like
Comment
Share
The People's Voice Feed
The People's Voice Feed
29 w

NASA Unearths Secret Underground City With Vast Tunnel Network 100 Feet Beneath the Ice
Favicon 
thepeoplesvoice.tv

NASA Unearths Secret Underground City With Vast Tunnel Network 100 Feet Beneath the Ice

NASA scientists have discovered the long-buried remains of Camp Century, a secret U.S. military base from the Cold War, hidden 100 feet below Greenland’s ice sheet. Originally presented as a research station, the base was [...] The post NASA Unearths Secret Underground City With Vast Tunnel Network 100 Feet Beneath the Ice appeared first on The People's Voice.
Like
Comment
Share
The People's Voice Feed
The People's Voice Feed
29 w

US-Made Missiles Strike Deep Inside Russia Hours After Biden Sends Another $20 Billion to Ukraine
Favicon 
thepeoplesvoice.tv

US-Made Missiles Strike Deep Inside Russia Hours After Biden Sends Another $20 Billion to Ukraine

In a dramatic escalation of the Ukraine conflict, Moscow announced Wednesday that six US-made ATACMS ballistic missiles were launched against a Russian airfield in the Black Sea port city of Taganrog. The escalation came hours [...] The post US-Made Missiles Strike Deep Inside Russia Hours After Biden Sends Another $20 Billion to Ukraine appeared first on The People's Voice.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Satire
Conservative Satire
29 w ·Youtube Funny Stuff

YouTube
Christopher Wray Fired From FBI
Like
Comment
Share
One America News Network Feed
One America News Network Feed
29 w

Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders Calls For Federal Action To Ban SNAP Recipients From Purchasing Junk Food
Favicon 
www.oann.com

Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders Calls For Federal Action To Ban SNAP Recipients From Purchasing Junk Food

Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders wrote to officials in Washington, D.C., about proposed amendments to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Like
Comment
Share
One America News Network Feed
One America News Network Feed
29 w

Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC Ratings Spiral Down 43% Following Trump’s Election Victory
Favicon 
www.oann.com

Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC Ratings Spiral Down 43% Following Trump’s Election Victory

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow has been dumped by almost half of her audience since President-elect Donald Trump’s Election Day win, according to recent statistics.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
29 w ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
Sen. Rand Paul's UNFILTERED Take on a Possible PARDON for Dr. Fauci
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
29 w ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
Chris Salcedo: There's a price for hiring 'incompetent, unqualified' government
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 231 out of 56666
  • 227
  • 228
  • 229
  • 230
  • 231
  • 232
  • 233
  • 234
  • 235
  • 236
  • 237
  • 238
  • 239
  • 240
  • 241
  • 242
  • 243
  • 244
  • 245
  • 246

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund