This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn More
Got It!
YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #cosplay #costume #outfit #weatherproof #unique
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Nostalgia Machine
Nostalgia Machine
32 w

The Unusual And Unapologetic Life Of Hunter S. Thompson
Favicon 
www.pastfactory.com

The Unusual And Unapologetic Life Of Hunter S. Thompson

Hunter S. Thompson was an American author and journalist, best known as the founder of the "gonzo journalism" movement. A struggling writer, he saw initial success after the release of his 1967 book about the Hell's Angels motorcycle gang, and slowly became well-known for his unique writing style and hard living. Along with his best-known novel, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, several of his works... Source
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
32 w

This Trump Pick Can Silently Strangle the Deep State
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

This Trump Pick Can Silently Strangle the Deep State

The Office of Management and Budget is a less well-known entity within the executive branch, but few are as critical for ensuring the implementation of the president’s agenda. President-elect Donald Trump has once again placed that awesome responsibility in Russ Vought’s hands. The previous Trump OMB director will return to the White House, where he says there is “unfinished business on behalf of the American people.” Trump released a statement announcing Vought’s nomination as OMB director on Friday evening. “I am very pleased to nominate Russell Thurlow Vought, from the Great State of Virginia, as the Director of the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB). He did an excellent job serving in this role in my First Term – We cut four Regulations for every new Regulation, and it was a Great Success! Russ graduated with a B.A. from Wheaton College, and received his J.D. from the Washington University School of Law,” Trump’s statement read. “Russ has spent many years working in Public Policy in Washington, D.C., and is an aggressive cost cutter and deregulator who will help us implement our America First Agenda across all Agencies. Russ knows exactly how to dismantle the Deep State and end Weaponized Government, and he will help us return Self Governance to the People. We will restore fiscal sanity to our Nation, and unleash the American People to new levels of Prosperity and Ingenuity. I look forward to working with you again, Russ. Congratulations. Together, we will Make America Great Again!” Thank you @realDonaldTrump! There is unfinished business on behalf of the American people, and it’s an honor of a lifetime to get the call again. https://t.co/iqxO733w63— Russ Vought (@russvought) November 23, 2024 OMB is not just the president’s budget division. While OMB oversees the structure and execution of the budget, it also has oversight powers over federal agencies and federal regulations to ensure the commands of the president, bestowed executive powers by the American people, are being followed. In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, Vought explained how OMB can use those powers to kill the deep state—a death by a thousand cuts. “OMB is the nerve center of the federal government, particularly the executive branch,” Vought told Carlson. “Office of Management and Budget has the ability to turn off the spending that’s going on at the agencies. It has all the regulations coming through it to assess whether it’s good, or bad, or too expensive, or could be done a different way, or ‘What does the president think?’” In short, “presidents use OMB to tame the bureaucracy,” Vought said. “It is the President’s most important tool for dealing with the bureaucracy, the administrative state,” he reiterated. “And you know, the nice thing about President Trump is he knows that, and he knows how to use it effectively.” Vought was previously atop the OMB, first in an acting capacity and then confirmed by the Senate, for the second half of Trump’s first term. His foremost achievement as OMB director was helping lay the groundwork for Trump’s most important campaign promise; namely, the construction of a wall along the southern border. While Trump issued an executive order instructing the federal government to build the wall his first week in office, actually getting the government to fund and construct it—whether because of Congress, the courts, or rogue bureaucrats—proved difficult. Trump, in consultation with Vought and others, used the transfer authority (provided by Congress in appropriations) and assumed emergency powers to construct hundreds of miles of border wall. “We at OMB gave him a plan to be able to go and fund the wall through money that was in the Department of Defense, and to use that because Congress wouldn’t give him the ordinary money at the Department of Homeland Security,” Vought told Carlson of the fight over the wall. In Vought, Trump has found a rare talent with the ability to articulate a vision to return government to the people with the technical knowledge to implement it. “The left has innovated over 100 years to create this fourth branch of an administrative state—you and I might call it the regime—this administrative state that is totally unaccountable to the president,” Vought said in his interview with Carlson. “The Left stopped talking about constitutional amendments because they innovated to this new fourth branch, which is totally different than anything the Founders would have ever understood.” “[When] Republicans that take office,” Vought continued, “you find that it’s incredibly difficult to wield power to get them to deal with all of that muscle memory, to get them to do what you want.” What’s needed, Vought added, is “a president kind of steps in and says, ‘I am fully aware of where I sit in the Constitution. I am fully aware of the tools at my disposal, and I’m going to use them on behalf of the American people, because I just won a massive agenda-setting election, and I’m going to go do what I said I would do.’ ” As Trump and Vought prepared to depart the White House in 2021, Vought told the president of his intention to start the Center for Renewing America, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank that sought to keep Trump’s policy vision alive in the nation’s capital. Trump was supportive of Vought’s endeavor, and the pair remained in close contact while Trump was out of power.  Vought’s fingerprints have been all over Republican politics and the conservative movement for the past four years. He wrote the Project 2025 chapter on how to reform the Executive Office of the President of the United States. In the media, he was an outspoken proponent for “draining the swamp” by making the federal agencies once again accountable to the president and the American people. And, over the summer, Vought lead the Republican National Convention’s policy platform committee. Now, his fingerprints will be all over bringing the bureaucracy to heel. The post This Trump Pick Can Silently Strangle the Deep State appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
32 w

Jack Smith Drops Trump Election Case
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Jack Smith Drops Trump Election Case

Special counsel Jack Smith filed a motion in D.C. District Court to drop the Jan. 6 case against President-elect Donald Trump with Judge Tanya Chutkan.  “As a result of the election held on November 5, 2024, the defendant, Donald J. Trump, will be inaugurated as President on January 20, 2025,” Smith’s motion said. NBC News just broke in to announce "Special Counsel Jack Smith just filed a motion to dismiss the federal criminal case against the president-elect."This is a MASSIVE WIN for the rule of law. pic.twitter.com/2lkzsE2v1t— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) November 25, 2024 “It has long been the position of the Department of Justice that the United States Constitution forbids the federal indictment and subsequent criminal prosecution of a sitting President. But the Department and the country have never faced the circumstance here, where a federal indictment against a private citizen has been returned by a grand jury and a criminal prosecution is already underway when the defendant is elected President.” Smith first secured a grand jury indictment in the election interference case 16 months ago. A federal court in Florida previously ruled that Smith lacked standing to bring the classified documents case against Trump The post Jack Smith Drops Trump Election Case appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
32 w

Are Illegal Migrants Less Likely to Commit Crime? Guess Again.
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Are Illegal Migrants Less Likely to Commit Crime? Guess Again.

In June, illegal alien Victor Martinez-Hernandez was charged with the murder of Rachel Morin, a mother of five in Maryland. Police in Oklahoma tracked the accused repeat offender down with a sample of his DNA recovered from a Los Angeles home invasion in which a 9-year-old girl and her mother were assaulted. Police say Martinez-Hernandez came to the U.S. illegally to escape prosecution for at least one other murder in his native El Salvador in December 2022.  “That should never have been allowed to happen,” said Harford County Sheriff Jeffrey Gahler, referring to the numerous missed red flags the case presented. His office apprehended Hernandez in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Like the member of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua sentenced to life in prison last week for the murder of nursing student Laken Riley in Georgia, Hernandez’s case is shining a light on the federal government’s failure to properly vet and keep track of lawless migrants. These gaps have led to broad claims that illegal immigrants have less involvement with the criminal justice system than native-born Americans. A review of the available data, however, shows that the criminal records of millions of migrants—the ones President-elect Donald Trump vows to prioritize for deportation—remain unknown due to illegal crossings, lax enforcement, and lax data collection by federal and “sanctuary” jurisdictions.  In addition, an analysis of the available statistics by RealClearInvestigations suggests that the crime rate involving noncitizens is vastly understated. A separate RCI analysis based on estimates developed by the Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice suggests that crime by illegal aliens who entered the U.S. by July 21 cost the country some $166.5 billion. These criminals disproportionately entered the U.S. during the Biden-Harris administration. The problem begins with incomplete initial vetting by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE. The criminal histories of migrants from far-flung countries with often shoddy record-keeping are somewhat hard to determine. It is also impractical to hold each person until he or she has passed a rigorous background check. As a result, ICE routinely releases many illegals into the country on their own recognizance and then discovers afterward that many had criminal records in their home countries.  In response to a request from Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-Texas, ICE reported this summer that it has released  7.4 million such “nondetained” noncitizens into the U.S. during the past four decades. ICE reports that these include 662,566 noncitizens with criminal histories—435,719 individuals with criminal convictions in their home countries and another 226,847 with pending criminal charges. These precise figures, however, do not say whether the crimes of the latter group were committed in the accused’s home country or the U.S.  In a July 21 letter to Gonzales, ICE reported that 13,099 of these nondetained individuals have convictions for homicide, with 1,845 facing criminal homicide charges. Another 9,461 have convictions for sex offenses (not including assault or commercialized sex), and 2,659 face pending charges. The convictions include other crimes such as assault (62,231), robbery (10,031), sexual assault (15,811), weapons offenses (13,423), and dangerous drugs (56,533).  These figures only suggest the extent of criminality because they only list the most serious crime committed by each individual. A murderer, for example, who also committed a sex offense is counted only as a murderer. A listing doesn’t include the fact that millions of migrants are violating the law because of their presence in the U.S. It also doesn’t account for the lawbreaking involved in working without proper authorization or the widespread use of stolen Social Security numbers to secure employment.  The 662,566 convicted and likely criminals make up 9% of the 7.4 million released noncitizens in the last four decades.  The statistics miss much of the relationship between crime and illegal aliens. Noncitizens in the “national docket data” either surrendered to Border Patrol agents or were apprehended at the border. Those who avoid surrender likely have reasons to evade authorities, such as a criminal background.  But there are others who avoided being caught and won’t be in these numbers. That group includes “gotaways”—individuals observed crossing the U.S. border illegally but not apprehended or turned back. With up to 38% of border agents shifted from monitoring to processing duties and 30% of surveillance cameras not functioning, millions more likely entered the U.S. undetected, potentially including the most dangerous individuals. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or CPB, estimates that some 2 million such “gotaways” have entered the country since 2021. The data on migrants who have been processed also understates the problem. Criminals rarely commit just one crime. For example, from 1990 to 2002, in the 75 most populous U.S. counties, 70% of those convicted of a violent felony had a prior arrest and 56% had a prior criminal conviction. In 2023 in Washington, D.C., the average homicide suspect had been arrested 11 times before committing a homicide. Data for 30 states shows that 60.1% of criminals released from prison in 2005 had been arrested again within two years, and 73.5% had been arrested within four years. The ICE data set provides a single entry for each individual. Most violent crimes don’t result in an arrest, so looking at arrests or convictions in other countries will underestimate whether illegal aliens are criminals. Across all U.S. cities in 2022, only 35.2% of violent crimes resulted in an arrest. While 50.6% of murders resulted in an arrest, just 24.1% of rapes produced an arrest, 22.7% of robberies, and 39.9% of aggravated assaults.  As the Laken Riley and Rachel Morin murder cases make clear, it is difficult to calculate all the victimization costs of crime to families and society. Using tools developed by the National Institute of Justice, RealClearInvestigations estimated the likely bare-minimum economic costs of crimes committed by illegal aliens. It arrived at an estimated cost to victims in dollar terms by assuming that each of the 662,566 “nondetained” noncitizen offenders on ICE’s list committed just once in the U.S. the crime for which he had been previously accused. ICE presented Gonzales with numbers on 42 different types of crime, but the National Institute of Justice calculated the cost to victims for only eight types of crime. Professor Mark Cohen at Vanderbilt University, who co-authored the original NIJ report, updated the list with 15 of the crime categories reported by ICE: murder, sexual assault, sexual offenses, robbery, assault, arson, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, weapon offenses, drugs, fraud, liquor offenses, gambling, and stolen property. Cohen’s updated numbers also provide estimates for the damage from child abuse, drunk driving, and vandalism, but ICE didn’t collect numbers on those crimes. The National Institute of Justice’s estimated losses from crime victimization include medical care/ambulances, mental health care, police/fire service costs, social/victim services, property loss/damage, reduced productivity (at work, home, and school), and nonmonetary losses (fear, pain, suffering, and lost quality of life).  Murders account for almost $153.8 billion of the $166.5 billion in estimated criminal victimization costs (a breakdown of the costs of crime for each type of crime is available here). Another $6 billion involves sexual assaults/offenses, and an additional $5.2 billion comes from sexual assaults and sexual offenses. Half of the crimes these nondetained individuals commit don’t have cost estimates. These crimes include kidnapping, embezzlement, extortion, smuggling, traffic offenses, and weapon offenses. These criminal illegal aliens entered the U.S. under multiple presidential administrations, but the size of the problem was likely larger under the Biden-Harris administration. That isn’t just because so many more illegal aliens were entering the country. Under the first Trump administration’s remain-in-Mexico policy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services performed background checks on immigrants. That included contacting their countries of origin.  ICE agents can’t access the same databases to check on migrants, and the agents don’t contact their home countries. Plus, the massive inflow of illegal immigrants has overwhelmed the system. ICE’s deputy director blames the “enormous workload” agents face, preventing them from doing even limited background checks. There are so many coming in that the government can’t house these immigrants until their backgrounds are properly checked. ICE has been processing criminals as they enter the country, but without identifying them as criminals. So, under the Biden-Harris administration, they have simply been released into the country. Now, they are walking freely in the United States, and no one knows where they are. As bad as these numbers are, the reality may be even worse. The Biden-Harris administration is accused of presenting the border crisis so that it does not look as bad as it is. In mid-September, retired San Diego Border Patrol Chief Aaron Heitk testified how the Biden-Harris administration ordered him not to publicize the arrests of illegal border crossers identified as having terrorist ties. The American Immigration Council, which strongly opposes Trump’s deportation policies, estimates that it could cost $88 billion to deport 1 million illegal immigrants. But if we accept this estimate and ignore the various government benefits that these individuals might be receiving, ICE’s number of 662,556 illegal criminal immigrants implies a cost of $58.3 billion to remove them—just over one-third of the conservative estimate given here of the cost of the crimes by these criminals. The estimate of over $160 billion in costs from criminal illegal aliens is quite likely an underestimate. It assumes the average criminal coming into the country commits only one offense similar to what he committed in his home country. We also aren’t counting the costs of half of criminal illegal aliens. This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire The post Are Illegal Migrants Less Likely to Commit Crime? Guess Again. appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
32 w

Elon Musk Slams Australia’s Online Safety Bill as Backdoor to Internet Control
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

Elon Musk Slams Australia’s Online Safety Bill as Backdoor to Internet Control

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Australia’s Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 has been formally introduced, to use age verification to prevent users under 16 from accessing social networks. The draft immediately attracted criticism centering on the methods of establishing internet users’ age, rather than the stated purpose, namely – to keep children away from social sites for their own good. These methods would involve either collection of biometric data, or users being forced to submit proof of government-issued ID. What this translates to has been summed up by X owner Elon Musk as “a backdoor” that will affect all Australians, in the way they access the internet. This, like similar age verification proposals and already passed laws, relies on everyone having to prove they’re not a minor, rather than finding a way of identifying minors while avoiding unmasking every online user. This could be because that way does not exist – and it also could be that various governments see absolutely nothing wrong with ending online anonymity, or using the cynical “think of the children” cliche to finally achieve that. That’s not something leading digital and civil rights in general groups and advocates think should be allowed to happen. But, one might say – “the push is real.” If and when this becomes law, parents in Australia won’t have the right to give consent for their under-16 children to use social media, while the onus, where it concerns fines, is on the companies behind these sites. The proposal is for the fines to go up to the equivalent of $32 million when a platform is found as not complying with the rules, the center-left cabinet now hopes to impose. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese chose to speak about this massive controversy in the making as, “a landmark reform.” “We know some kids will find workarounds, but we’re sending a message to social media companies to clean up their act,” he is quoted as saying. This can be read as – “The kids aren’t really our first priority here. It’s to have more leverage over tech companies running social platforms, and, of course, ending online anonymity would be a bonus.” Katie Maskiell of UNICEF Australia fears that this “solution” might actually end up driving children to “covert and unregulated online spaces.” If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Elon Musk Slams Australia’s Online Safety Bill as Backdoor to Internet Control appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
32 w

With a Few Tweaks, Meta’s Smart Glasses Can Expose Names, Addresses, and Even Family Details With a Single Glance
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

With a Few Tweaks, Meta’s Smart Glasses Can Expose Names, Addresses, and Even Family Details With a Single Glance

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post With a Few Tweaks, Meta’s Smart Glasses Can Expose Names, Addresses, and Even Family Details With a Single Glance appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
32 w

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt: Social Media’s Failure to Police “Misinformation” Is a “Regulatory Problem”
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt: Social Media’s Failure to Police “Misinformation” Is a “Regulatory Problem”

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt has stirred controversy by criticizing social media’s handling of “misinformation,” describing it as a regulatory failure and branding social media as a “threat to democracy.” His comments were made in response to ideas raised by a fourth-year graduate student in molecular biology, during a discussion on the broader impacts of technology and artificial intelligence. Schmidt, who played a pivotal role in shaping the digital world, including the carelessness when it comes to online privacy, asserted that the original developers of social media did not foresee its potential negative impacts on democratic values. “None of us thought when we invented social media that we would become a threat to democracy,” Schmidt said. In his critique, Schmidt called out social media companies for their allegedly lax approach to “misinformation,” suggesting that their failure to police content stemmed from a lack of regulatory compulsion and was driven by profit motives. “The misinformation one is easy,” Schmidt explained, claiming that “the social media companies have chosen not to police it because they haven’t been required to and they make more money because of it.” However, Schmidt’s stance will raise concerns among free speech advocates who argue that his call for more stringent regulation could lead to excessive censorship and infringe on free expression. Critics argue that the solution to “misinformation” should not rely solely on increased regulation and censorship, but by encouraging open discourse that allows ideas to be debated and scrutinized in the public space. Related: Eric Schmidt’s AI Think Tank Urges NATO to Monitor “Disinformation” in Real-Time, Coordinate Responses Schmidt has been a controversial figure in privacy and surveillance discussions. His leadership saw Google vastly expand its data collection, using personal information to tailor advertisements, which raised significant privacy concerns. Schmidt’s views on privacy, epitomized by his statement, “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place,” showed a dismissive attitude toward privacy concerns and alarmed both privacy advocates and the public. Schmidt’s tenure also involved privacy breaches, such as the unauthorized collection of data from unsecured WiFi networks by Google Street View cars, leading to international fines and investigations. Further controversy stemmed from Google’s alleged cooperation with the US National Security Agency (NSA), sharing user data without clear user consent. Schmidt has, more recently said there should be no online anonymity when using AI. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt: Social Media’s Failure to Police “Misinformation” Is a “Regulatory Problem” appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
32 w

Anti-Police Activist Spent Charity Money on Travel, Clothes
Favicon 
hotair.com

Anti-Police Activist Spent Charity Money on Travel, Clothes

Anti-Police Activist Spent Charity Money on Travel, Clothes
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
32 w

Washington Post Describes Distraught Lefty 'News Quitters' as Just... 'Some People'
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Washington Post Describes Distraught Lefty 'News Quitters' as Just... 'Some People'

Democrat newspapers like The Washington Post love to tag conservatives as "conservative," and also as "ultraconservative," "far right," and "extremist." But they seem absolutely incapable of describing leftists and progressives as....leftists and progressives. On the front page of Monday's Style section is a hilarious piece on depressed lefties turning off and tuning out their "news" sources. These "news quitters" are described as... "some people." The headline:  No news is good news Some people disappointed in the election results are tuning out the media as a form of self-care  Nowhere in Izadi's story is anyone identified as on the left, or as a Democrat. The complete lack of ideological labeling includes the captions on C-2: TOP: People watch a broadcast in Seattle on Election Day. ABOVE: TV watchers in Atlanta react as Vice President Kamala Harris gives a speech conceding the presidential election earlier this month. Some people are now skipping the news after Donald Trump's win.  Here's the story's lede:  Andrew DelPonte, a teenager in Maryland, started his days listening to NPR. Brandon Wilson, a professor in California, drove his long commute home blaring MSNBC on SiriusXM. And Michelle Mullins, who works on corporate food loss and waste in Arkansas, fell asleep most nights watching CNN’s Anderson Cooper. That is, until Nov. 6. Since the election, they’ve had it with the news. NPR, MSNBC, CNN: sources that the Post knows are Democrat strongholds. You have to love how much these Democrats don't want to hear Democrats blaming each other. Professor Wilson is unintentionally funny:  It was the Monday-morning quarterbacking he couldn’t stand; he felt it was too early to nitpick about how Harris had run her campaign, and he found “the finger-pointing and bashing of the Democratic Party” to be counterproductive. (It’s worth noting that liberal-leaning MSNBC saw a big drop-off in audience the week after the election, whereas Fox News saw a big jump.)  “We’re all absorbing a lot about what this win is going to mean, and the last thing I need is a lot of things that raise my blood pressure,” says Wilson, 53. “Like blaming the candidate for some obvious problems with the electorate, like misinformation and disinformation.” Blame the electorate! They voted Republican, which means they were misinformed! Izadi of The Post even implied that The Post had been essential reading for frustrated Democrats, like 36-year-old Drew Stanecki:  So he immediately turned off the notification alerts on his Washington Post and New York Times apps. During Trump’s first term, he read so much news that he had to institute a “no-Washington-Post-after-7-p.m.” rule so he could sleep at night. Now he doesn’t want anything pushed to him. Izadi doesn't want to trash these "news quitters" as overly emotional or immature, just adaptive. "Look at that: Humans doing something psychologically beneficial for a change." Unless they never return to reading the Post. Permanent "news quitters" won't be good for them. 
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
32 w

NFL issues security warning to players about 'organized and skilled' criminals targeting their homes
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

NFL issues security warning to players about 'organized and skilled' criminals targeting their homes

The NFL's security team told its players that thieves are looking to exploit their team schedules and target athletes' homes on game days.After Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes was burglarized and tight end Travis Kelce was robbed of $20,000, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has been looking into the string of robberies that are allegedly connected to a crime syndicate in South America.Reporter Diana Russini has since revealed that the NFL told players to be aware that their homes were being targeted on days the criminals might suspect the players are absent."The homes of professional athletes across multiple sports leagues have become increasingly targeted for burglaries by organized and skilled groups," the memo posted on X stated. "Law enforcement officials have noted these groups appear to exploit team schedules to target athletes' homes on game days."'Do not post public images of expensive items.'The memo also stated that burglary groups appear to have been gathering information from a combination of public records, media reports, and social media posts.As such, the league advised players against making any social media "check-ins" about their daily activities or whereabouts. "Do not post public images of expensive items (e.g., jewelry, vehicles, or clothing) on social media accounts. Do not post images of or comments about your residence or hotel accommodations," the memo continued.The NFL said the thieves have been essentially performing disguised heists, often conducting extensive surveillance on targets, their residences, and even their security measures. Then, the purported burglars are posing as delivery men, grounds maintenance, or even joggers in the neighborhood.Side doors, balconies, and second-floor windows have been used to gain entry to houses, with patio furniture or ladders sometimes used to scale walls.In terms of what has been taken from the athletes, NFL officials said that master bedrooms have been the predominant targets where the thieves look for jewelry, handbags, cash, and watches. Of course, safes have been a popular target, as well.The NFL Network previously reported that the robberies are in connection with a "transnational crime ring" that has focused on NBA and NFL players "all over the country."A former FBI agent told ABC News that athletes are easily targeted due to the plethora of public information regarding their whereabouts."Their schedules were going to be published when they're going to play a game, so it makes it easy when to go to the house," said former agent Brad Garrett. "These high-profile folks are really ripe targets."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 2452 out of 56666
  • 2448
  • 2449
  • 2450
  • 2451
  • 2452
  • 2453
  • 2454
  • 2455
  • 2456
  • 2457
  • 2458
  • 2459
  • 2460
  • 2461
  • 2462
  • 2463
  • 2464
  • 2465
  • 2466
  • 2467

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund