One of the many side quests available in Wuthering Waves is “Investigate the theft of camp supplies,” and this quest guide will help you figure out where to find the clues and reveal the culprit. How to find the clues in “Investigate the theft of camp supplies” side quest Once you begin this side quest, you’ll be tasked with examining the area for clues. This can be a tricky one to figure out if you don’t know where to look or who to talk to. The easiest way to spot clues is to use the Sensor ability. This should immediately warn you about the footprints on the ground not too far from the NPC you got the quest from. Screenshots: PC Invasion The next clue is this box that doesn’t seem like a clue at all until you trigger it with your Sensor Utility. Finally, you’ll find the last clue right across from the NPC you chatted with. You’ll find documents sitting on a table with a blue light. Screenshot: PC Invasion Aside...

Echo Hunters is one of the first events in Wuthering Waves. To complete it and earn a bunch of free Astrite, all you need to do is hunt down five target Echoes, level up your Data Bank, and complete a quest called Silver-Haired Echo Trainer. This is actually much easier than it sounds, but a lot of players are struggling with Echo Hunters because of the confusing UI and menus that you have to shuffle through in order to track down your targets. Once you get the hang of things, however, you can cross the event off your list in no time. Target Echo Locations How to Reach Data Bank Level 10 How to Complete Silver-Haired Echo Trainer All 5 Target Echo Locations in Wuthering Waves Screenshot: PC Invasion The main part of the event is tracking down all five target Echoes. The game seemingly doesn’t give you any hints, but you can actually click on the blank pictures of each target Echo and the game will show you exactly where to find them on the map. You don̵...

If you’re having trouble affording groceries, don’t expect sympathy from the White House. In a recent interview, President Joe Biden was told that food prices are up more than 30% on his watch. But he casually dismissed this fact, claiming people have money to pay those elevated prices. This doesn’t just demonstrate Biden’s tone-deafness to the plight of Americans who struggle to afford necessities like groceries; it shows his ignorance of his own administration’s data. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, average weekly paychecks have increased about $150 under Biden, or 14.1% in roughly three years. Normally, that would be cause for celebration, but not in the inflationary environment of “Bidenomics.” Because prices have risen an average of 19.3% during Biden’s tenure, the average real, or inflation-adjusted, weekly paycheck has shrunk by about $50, or 4.4%. Today’s larger paychecks buy less, and consumers are being squeezed by higher prices everywhere. This drop in purchasing power has many families relying on credit cards to make ends meet, pushing outstanding balances up to $1.1 trillion, even while the interest rate on that debt is at a record high. Contrary to the president’s claim, it doesn’t sound like Americans have the money to pay 30% more for food. As Americans put more necessities on their credit cards, finance charges alone have exploded to more than $200 billion per year. If people can’t afford rent and food, they certainly can’t afford mounting interest costs. Those higher interest costs can also be seen on mortgages, student loans, and car loans. Between those higher finance charges and the lost buying power from declining real earnings, a typical American family lost $8,100 of their annual income compared with when Biden took office. It’s no wonder people struggle to get by amid this cost-of-living crisis. Some major expenses, like a home renovation, can be put off in hard times. But food is a necessity, and there’s no avoiding these higher prices. This hits lower-income families particularly hard, because consumers shift their buying habits when inflation is high to save money. As middle- and even upper-income shoppers buy lower-priced items from their grocer to save money, there is a surge in demand for foodstuffs that were disproportionately bought by lower-income households. Eggs are just one example of this phenomenon. They have historically been a relatively inexpensive source of protein, vitamin D, and other nutrients. As more Americans swap purchases of things like beef with eggs to save money, the higher demand for eggs has pushed prices up much faster than the average inflation rate for food. That’s a key reason why egg prices are up 40.9% under Bidenomics. And eggs aren’t the only things at the grocery store that will induce sticker shock. Prices of other consumer staples such as flour, sugar, and butter have skyrocketed in price under Biden’s tenure, increasing 38.3%, 30.7%, and 35.9%, respectively. Americans’ incomes haven’t risen nearly as quickly as food prices have during the Biden administration, resulting from failed public policy. Spending and borrowing trillions of dollars we didn’t have, manipulating interest rates, and printing money to try to pay it all has crushed American consumers under an elephantine cost of living and burgeoning debt. Sadly, Biden seems blissfully unaware not only of the extent of this problem, but also of his role in taking food out of the mouths of Americans. Originally published at WashingtonTimes.com The post Oblivious Biden Pretends Rising Food Prices Aren’t a Problem appeared first on The Daily Signal.

The Lithium-Ion Battery 'Energy Storage' Facility Blaze You Hadn't Heard About...Is Still Burning

Sandy Hernandez, a resident of Miami, experienced an incredible twist of fate after losing his two beloved dogs. Sandy’s journey began when his two huskies, Ragnar and Cloud, disappeared after managing to hop the fence in his backyard. This unexpected escape led Sandy on a determined quest to find his furry companions, utilizing every possible... The post Man interrupts huskies’ adoption photoshoot shouting ‘those are my dogs’ appeared first on Animal Channel.

Swifties are not gonna like this. After weeks of backlash against Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker for his pro-woman, pro-tradition, and pro-religion speech at the commencement ceremony at Benedictine College in Atchison, Kansas, his celebrity teammate Travis Kelce spoke out in defense of Butker - which is huge, considering the fact that Kelce is dating pop singer/songwriter Taylor Swift, whose fans roasted Butker’s stance and traditional values. Here’s an excerpt from Butker’s speech on May 11 that garnered so much controversy: How many of you are sitting here now about to cross this stage and are thinking about all the promotions and titles you are going to get in your career? Some of you may go on to lead successful careers in the world, but I would venture to guess that the majority of you are most excited about your marriage and the children you will bring into this world. Butker also condemned IVF and abortion as ways of “playing God.” Butker has been roasted by mainstream media, celebrities, and even other athletes over his traditional views and values. But on Friday, the Kansas City Chiefs tight end came out in defense of Butker. Related: ‘Feminist Hags’ Blast Butker’s Pro-Woman Speech: MRCTV’s Mandelburg on OANN “I’ve known him for seven plus years, probably, eight plus years. And I cherish him as a teammate,” Kelce said on “New Heights,” a podcast he hosts with his brother Jason Kelce, a former Eagles player.   Kelce added the following about Butker, who he calls “Harry”: He’s treated friends and family that I’ve introduced to him with nothing but respect and kindness and that’s how he treats everyone. When it comes down to his views and what he said at Saint Benedict’s commencement speech, those are his. I can’t say I agree with the majority of it or just about any of it outside of just him loving his family and his kids and I don’t think that I should judge him by his views, especially his religious views, of how to go about life. That’s just not who I am. Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes shared a similar sentiment on Wednesday, noting that Butker was a “good person” regardless of whether or not he necessarily agreed with him. While Travis Kelce annoys me and Taylor Swift can’t sing, I appreciate that Kelce, given his place in pop culture right now, defended his friend and acknowledged what we’ve been saying throughout this whole process: we’re all entitled to our own opinions and have a constitutional right to proclaim those opinions.  Follow us on Twitter/X: Despite the leftist mob coming to cancel him, The Kansas City Chiefs are standing behind Harrison Butker. Patrick Mahomes & Andy Reid address their support. pic.twitter.com/h446W0ykAK — MRCTV (@mrctv) May 23, 2024

MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell spread straight-up disinformation on her Friday show as she accused Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of condemning the famous 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education that ruled segregation unconstitutional because, apparently, nobody at MSNBC knows how to read. The context was the Court ruling that South Carolina did not do anything illegal in not drawing a second district where black voters would’ve made a substantial portion of the electorate. Addressing the NCAAP’s Janai Nelson, Mitchell read, “something that really was striking to me is Justice Clarence Thomas in his concurring opinion with the majority, he also went after Brown v. Board of Education, saying quote ‘such extravagant uses of judicial power are at odds with the history and tradition of the equity power and the Framers’ design.’”     Flabbergasted, she continued, “Now, Clarence Thomas took the seat of Thurgood Marshall, who argued Brown v. Board for the Legal Defense Fund. This landmark case that changed America forever. So, I’m just-- I can't get over that. Tell me what your reaction is.” Most people know Brown was decided in 1954 and banned segregation, but fewer people are aware of a second case decided in 1955 with the same name. It was that one Thomas was criticizing. Here’s what he wrote in full context: The Court’s ‘impatience with the pace of desegregation’ caused by resistance to Brown v. Board of Education, … ‘led us to approve . . . extraordinary remedial measures,’ … In the follow-on case to Brown, the Court considered ‘the manner in which relief [was] to be accorded’ for vindication of ‘the fundamental principle that racial discrimination in public education is unconstitutional.’ Brown v. Board of Education, … (1955) (Brown II). In doing so, the Court took a boundless view of equitable remedies, describing equity as being “characterized by a practical flexibility in shaping its remedies and by a facility for adjusting and reconciling public and private needs. That understanding may have justified temporary measures to 'overcome the widespread resistance to the dictates of the Constitution' prevalent at that time, but, as a general matter, ‘[s]uch extravagant uses of judicial power are at odds with the history and tradition of the equity power and the Framers’ design.’” Thomas clearly wrote “Brown II” and was clearly not condemning desegregation. Of course, Nelson wasn’t going to call Mitchell out on her disinformation. Instead, she also claimed Thomas was talking about Brown I and accused Thomas of being the one spreading fake news, “Well, we know Justice Thomas took the seat, but he did not fill it and what he did in disseminating disinformation about a landmark decision whose commemoration we just honored this past Friday, 70 years since Brown we see a Supreme Court justice who benefitted from Brown, as did every American, castigating that case, misconstruing it and suggesting that it stands for something that it does not.” Andrea Mitchell has been forced to issue multiple corrections for spreading fake news. It is time she does so again. Here is a transcript for the May 24 show: MSNBC Andrea Mitchell Reports 5/24/2024 12:49 PM ET ANDREA MITCHELL: And also, Janai, something that really was striking to me is Justice Clarence Thomas in his concurring opinion with the majority, he also went after Brown v. Board of Education, saying quote “such extravagant uses of judicial power are at odds with the history and tradition of the equity power and the Framers’ design.” Now, Clarence Thomas took the seat of Thurgood Marshall, who argued Brown v. Board for the Legal Defense Fund. This landmark case that changed America forever. So, I’m just-- I can't get over that. Tell me what your reaction is. JANAI NELSON: Well, we know Justice Thomas took the seat, but he did not fill it and what he did in disseminating disinformation about a landmark decision whose commemoration we just honored this past Friday, 70 years since Brown we see a Supreme Court justice who benefitted from Brown, as did every American, castigating that case, misconstruing it and suggesting that it stands for something that it does not. Brown requires that we provide equal access to our democracy through education, and it's anchored in the idea of citizenship. Brown said that one of the most important functions of local and state government is to provide an education for purposes of citizenship, and citizenship could not be more clearly exercised than through the voting process, and what the Supreme Court has done in Alexander v. South Carolina is completely distort that process, manipulate it, and allow partisan actors to completely capture that process in a way that directly harms black voters. It’s an invitation to exploit black voters for partisan gain.

Syndicated radio host Mark Levin excoriated President Joe Biden for presiding over an economy so bad that even fast food is increasingly unaffordable.  During the May 22 edition of The Mark Levin Show, Levin tied steep prices hikes at formerly affordable fast food chains to out-of-control spending in D.C. Levin addressed the historical importance of cheap, processed food in America, before tackling a Breitbart report that detailed major price increases at chains such as Chick-fil-A, Popeyes, Wendy’s, Burger King, Taco Bell, McDonald's, Chipotle and Starbucks.   After addressing how many Americans have long relied on processed food or fast food, Levin pointed out that Americans need cheap food prices more than ever. “Now when you have an economy where the interest rates are through the roof, where the inflation is through the roof and you have a husband and a wife and two or three or four kids or a single parent with two or three kids it is tough going,” Levin said. He added: “I’m sure those kids would love to have fresh beef or chicken or fish or turkey. I’m sure they would love to have fresh vegetables. I’m sure they’d love it. But they can’t afford it, not with Bidenomics!” Levin didn’t mince words on the reason for these higher prices. “This is what happens when you have massive government spending, massive government debt, massive government borrowing. I’ve said it here for 22 d*mn years, inflation, inflation, inflation, it is a killer,” Levin said. “It destroys the market system. It distorts the value of the dollar.” The radio host also ripped Biden for being deceptive about inheriting 9% inflation from former President Donald Trump (Inflation was 1.4% in Jan 2021). Levin called out another Biden attempt to deflect blame onto the fast food companies. “So he blamed the businesses that are trying desperately to cope with the economic conditions he created, with the minimum wage conditions that he and others have created, with the supply chain problems he has created,” Levin said.  Conservatives are under attack! Contact ABC News at (818) 460-7477, CBS News at (212) 975-3247 and NBC News at (212) 664-6192 and demand they tell the truth about the Bidenomics disaster.

College students were quizzed by social media influencer Zach Sage Fox, and despite offering them a $100 prize for correct answers, they weren’t able to pull it off. “Have you guys chanted, ‘From the river to the sea'?” Fox asks one student, who answers, “Yes.” “Okay, which river? Which sea?” He presses. This particular student is attending Sarah Lawrence, where the tuition is over $85,000 a year. “She knows it's Jordan and Mediterranean,” Pat Gray says. “She knows that.” “Because the state of education right now, with Biden in office, is so good that you would think she’d immediately know,” he jokes. While Gray had hope, the girl, who was holding a pro-Palestinian sign, did not know the answer. “What does Hamas say their number one goal is according to their charter?” Fox asked another pro-Palestinian student. “They just want to free Palestine,” the student answers. “No,” Fox says. “Murder all Jews around the world.” “How many years did Israel occupy Gaza?” he asks more students, who all get it wrong. “It was actually under Egyptian control for the first twenty or so years, and then Israel actually left Gaza in 2006,” Fox explains to the clueless students, before asking one of the most chilling questions of all. “How much have our foreign adversaries donated to American universities in the last decade?” he asks, to which again, no one knows the answer. “The answer was over six billion,” he says. “That says everything right there. You don’t think they have influence over your kid’s education?” Keith Malinak says. Want more from Pat Gray?To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

When Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s wife flew an upside-down American flag over their home, the New York Times was not happy. Now, the New York Times is upset with the justice again — this time because he flew an "Appeal to Heaven" pine tree flag outside his New Jersey beach home. The Times is claiming this is a popular symbol among January 6 “insurrectionists.” While the New York Times clearly has no idea what they’re talking about, they’re in luck. Because Glenn Beck does know what he’s talking about, and he’s here to give them a much needed history lesson. “That was the symbol of New England since the 16th century. Why? Because New England had big pine trees. Why was that important? Because they could build ships and build them for England or whoever and ship giant masts, which were hard to find because nobody had the giant pine trees that New England had,” Glenn explains. The flag is also symbolic of “the Great Peacemaker,” who was with the Iroquois Indians. The peacemaker had convinced warring nations to bury their weapons under a pine tree. “So, it is also the symbol of the tree of peace,” Glenn says. “It was also on the coinage produced by the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and it became the symbol of the colonial iron resistance as well as a multi-tribal support for independence now,” he adds. The phrase “Appeal to Heaven” is also an expression of the right to revolution, which Glenn jokes comes from the “outrageous killer John Locke.” “Let me just boil this down,” he explains. “This flag is first a sign of the pine tree as trade, okay? It is also a sign of peace among the Indians. It is then added to that ‘the appeal to heaven’ comes from John Locke and what he wrote in 1690. It was a refute of the theory of the divine right of kings.” Glenn has his own interpretation of the flag, and it’s not a symbol of insurrection. “I always interpreted that flag as an appeal to heaven for common sense and for help. Please Lord, help us, and it would go right along with an upside-down flag,” he explains, adding, “We’re in distress. Can we please look to God and beg for his mercy and guidance. How unbelievably controversial is that.” Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.