French MPs are in a mad race to promote death at any price. Members in the French National Assembly are currently debating a bill on euthanasia. A worrying momentum has been building over the last few days, causing widespread alarm both in public opinion and among the medical profession. One by one, ethical barriers are being removed, making this proposed law one of the most permissive in the world. The members of parliament are currently meeting in a special committee before the general debate due to take place in the chamber on May 27th. Since work began on examining the law, there has been a dramatic surge of amendments and new provisions aimed at getting rid of all the safeguards initially proposed in the government’s plan to limit recourse to ‘aid in dying.’  In recent months, President Emmanuel Macron had called for “caution,” while health minister Catherine Vautrin wanted to “maintain the balance.” These calls for vigilance may have been insincere, but at least they were said. They were, however, not heeded. The first significant shift was the introduction of assisted dying into the public health code. This choice, apparently purely formal, is very important. It implies that euthanasia will henceforth be considered as “care.” A few months ago, some left-wing MPs were already using this term to describe abortion.  A second serious shift concerns the eligibility criteria for aid in dying. The initial wording referred to “a short or medium-term life-threatening condition”. Against the government’s advice, the members of the Special Committee voted to replace the wording with the notion of an “advanced or terminal phase” of the illness. Yannick Neuder, a Les Républicains MP and doctor, expressed his alarm at this serious change in terminology on X: “There are hundreds of cases of illnesses that are curable even though they are terminal.” In these cases, patients run the risk of inappropriately being pushed towards aid in dying.Power up with Nitric Boost that’s now 40% OFF! This potent formula gives you the massive edge in strength and superior circulation for that unparalleled performance you've been looking for! The heart of the law is Article 5, which defines the term “aid in dying,” i.e., the administration of a lethal substance by the person concerned. Euthanasia, in which the lethal act is carried out by a carer or a third party, was initially intended to be an exception for patients who were “physically unable to carry it out.” Here again, the debates in committee changed the initial draft. An amendment removed the criterion of physical impossibility, leaving the patient freer to decide between these two methods of aid in dying. Euthanasia is therefore no longer an ‘exception.’ In countries that had planned to allow the two methods to coexist, euthanasia is ultimately carried out in the overwhelming majority of cases. The 48-hour period for patients to consider whether they wish to receive aid in dying has been relaxed: it can now be shortened on the advice of a doctor.  Catholic lawyer and columnist Erwan Le Morhedec, a volunteer in palliative care, whistleblower, and author of a book on the march towards euthanasia in France, follows the changes in the legislation on a daily basis and reports on all the abuses that have been recorded and are well known in countries that are ‘ahead’ of France on the issue of euthanasia. Drawing parallels with the laws in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Canada, he concludes that the French proposal will go much further, and that the remedies available to oppose mass recourse to euthanasia will be woefully inadequate. Far-left LFI MP Danielle Simonnet is campaigning “for it to be possible to access aid in dying if you are no longer fully conscious.” Le Morhedec points out that in the Netherlands and Canada, this approach has made it possible to euthanise Alzheimer’s patients, once the ‘end of life’ criterion has been removed.  In the latest provisions to be ratified by the MEPs, we learn that it will be possible to challenge the decision to refuse euthanasia, but that it will not be possible for a relative to challenge the decision to grant it. On the model of what exists for abortion, an “offence of hindering assisted dying” was created, while the creation of an “offence of inciting assisted suicide” was rejected. The parallel between abortion and euthanasia is perfectly obvious: #DirectAN Amendement 1918 propose d'établir un délit d'entrave à l'aide à mourir, sur le modèle de celui pour l'IVG. La ministre donne un avis favorable. "Il faut anticiper" avance @SimonnetDeputee et soutient un parallélisme entre aide à mourir et IVG. pic.twitter.com/bmREnFE1Nf— Gènéthique (@Genethique) May 17, 2024 Also rejected was the ban on third parties requesting assistance in dying taking out death insurance—a ban initially included to avoid abuse of weakness. It’s easy to imagine the sordid scenarios that would ensue from such a situation.  Many MPs, both Left and Right, are concerned about the direction the debate is taking. Centre-right LR MP Annie Genevard believes that a “Pandora’s box” has been opened, while Communist Pierre Dharréville speaks of a “tipping point” with “dizzying anthropological dimensions.” The chair of the committee, Agnès Firmin Le Bodo, from the governing Renaissance party, also feels worried: “We’re no longer working under the same law. This is not the balance of the law that was intended.”  LR MP Philippe Juvin denounced the “manipulation of words” surrounding the debates. He explained on X that “the words ‘euthanasia’ and ‘assisted suicide’ are totally absent from the text of a law that only talks about them.” The debates prefer to talk about “attractive ‘care and support homes’ presented as major advances.” Under these conditions, how can we fail to think of the famous “merciful death” extolled by the National Socialists in the Aktion T4 programme designed to implement the physical elimination of the disabled in the Third Reich in 1939?  Although still timidly, voices of protest are being raised in the public debate. Former centrist minister François Bayrou, interviewed on the LCI channel, explained that he was in favour of “another vision” which he believes “is much more generous and powerful as a society and civilisation.” Jeanne-Françoise Hutin, an 85-year-old campaigner for European integration, announced in the press that she would be giving up her Legion of Honour if the bill were to be adopted. She explains in the daily Ouest-France: I would no longer be able to join this Order of the Legion of Honour—this order that has always defended the most vulnerable. The law would reintroduce into our legal arsenal a right that was withdrawn in 1981: the right to give death. The purpose of this law is to end life, to kill people who are in a very fragile situation, with, moreover, limits that are completely blurred … and we have seen in recent years what has happened when the limits are blurred! For the moment, the voice of the Catholic Church in France remains very timid, as if the high clergy had not grasped the seriousness of what is happening. There has been no recent official communication on the subject. Nevertheless, we can remain hopeful. These crazy measures were decided by a “special committee”—a small group of MPs. It will be up to the members of parliament, and then the senators in a full session, to change the course of this evil reform that seems to be taking shape by invalidating it. They have the power—but will they have the courage? Globalists May Release New Bird Flu Strain In Attempt To Stop Trump, Warns Edward Dowd

Are Biden's gaffes a consequence of his aneurysm? President Joe Biden suffered two aneurysms in the late 1980s that almost ended his life, according to a report by the Washington Post (WaPo). According to the Jeff Bezos-owned news outlet, the first aneurysm happened to Biden in February 1988 when he was 45 years old. It had been misdiagnosed as a pinched nerve, with the then-U.S. senator for Delaware taking at least 10 acetaminophen tablets a day to provide at least a modicum of pain relief. However, doctors discovered the dangerous warping of a blood vessel; had it burst, it would have likely been fatal. Biden then underwent an emergency surgery to correct the condition and address its potentially deadly consequences. This severe February 1988 aneurysm stemmed from the initial misdiagnosis. Biden’s refusal to seek immediate medical attention even as the pain in his neck became unbearable also made things worse. WaPo reported that a Catholic priest was even called in to administer the Last Rites to him. Citing an account by the president’s sister Valerie Biden Owens, WaPo recounted that Jill Biden intervened and prevented the priest from giving the U.S. senator the Viaticum.Save 40% on our limited edition Brain Force Ultra that’s loaded with proprietary super ingredients! “Jill Biden, who had been ordered to stay out of the room, burst in, yelling at [the priest] to leave. ‘You’re not giving him the Last Rites. He’s not going to die,’ she said,” according to WaPo. Doctors pushed through with the risky surgery, which ultimately saved Biden’s life. But the then-senator wasn’t out of the water yet, as he suffered a pulmonary embolism while in recovery. The National Pulse explains that a pulmonary embolism is “sudden blockage of arteries that brings blood to the lungs.” Biden did recover from this embolism, but the earlier aneurysm was followed by a second one found in May 1988, which again required surgery. The senator recovered from this second surgery and eventually made his way to the White House – spending eight years as vice president before being elected as chief executive in the rigged 2020 elections. Are Biden’s gaffes a consequence of his aneurysm? “An aneurysm is a warping in a blood vessel, commonly as a bulge or bubble. Aneurysms can fill with blood and subsequently rupture. When ruptured, aneurysms are fatal in about 50 percent of cases,” the Pulse continued. “Even among those who survive, two-thirds will suffer long-term neurological damage. Aneurysms can be genetic and continue to appear in a patient over time. At 81 years old, Biden’s history of aneurysms may raise additional concerns about the closely guarded state of his health.” In February, the Pulse reported how Biden refused to take a cognitive test during his annual physical examination at the time. “I’m squared away, they say I look too young,” he told reporters at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Maryland where he had his physical exam. (Related: Doctors urge Biden to take MENTAL COMPETENCY test following increasing evidence of president’s cognitive decline.) White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre also confirmed that Biden didn’t undergo a cognitive test during his physical exam, arguing that he “doesn’t need one.” Former President Donald Trump has poked fun at Biden’s failing cognitive function – as evidenced by the incumbent’s various verbal gaffes – in multiple instances. She also declined to make Biden’s physician available for questioning by reporters, contending that it’s not the standard practice. According to the Pulse, “This deviates from the usual protocol during the Trump administration, when the former president’s physician was subjected to extensive questioning.” Head over to JoeBiden.news for more stories about the incumbent president’s health. Watch this video from “Fox and Friends First” about the White House scolding reporters on their “false” coverage of the president’s health. Globalists May Release New Bird Flu Strain In Attempt To Stop Trump, Warns Edward Dowd

You know when 4 year olds figure out ‘The Tele-Tubbies’ aren’t real? Why can’t adults do the same? pic.twitter.com/IUFHLXMHxs — Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) May 20, 2024

by Michael Snyder, The Economic Collapse Blog: Have you ever felt like you can never seem to get ahead no matter how hard you try?  If so, you are definitely not alone.  The gap between the ultra-wealthy and the rest of us has never been greater, and more wealth is being transferred to the top […]

by Pam Martens and Russ Martens, Wall St On Parade: Last Thursday, in a stunning 7-2 win for the little guys and gals in America, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd., et al. Making the decision all the more […]

from Lunar Landing Discussions:  TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

What kind of White House transgression merits the punishment of being given the Herculean task of correcting the official transcripts of President Joe Biden's speech for official release? Making fun of Kamala's laugh? Biting Joe's German shepherd back when it bites you? Heck, if we find out who's currently editing...

One individual has died and dozens others sustained injuries after a Singapore Airlines Boeing flight encountered severe turbulence and plunged several thousand feet. The flight had left London for Singapore and diverted to Suvarnabhumi Airport in Bangkok. The aircraft reportedly made an emergency landing in Bangkok at 3:45 p.m. local time. “We can confirm that there are injuries and one fatality on board the Boeing 777-300ER. There were a total of 211 passengers and 18 crew on board,” the company stated. Singapore Airlines Boeing 777 flight SQ321 from London to Singapore dropped about 6000 feet due to an air pocket & severe turbulence. 1 Passenger has died and over 30 injured #SingaporeAirlines #Boeing pic.twitter.com/zwSFfnERaX — Rosy (@rose_k01) May 21, 2024 “Singapore Airlines offers its deepest condolences to the family of the deceased,” the airline said, according to the New York Post.  From the New York Post: It wasn’t immediately clear if the onboard fatality was a passenger or crew member. Roughly 11 hours into the flight, FlightRadar24 tracking data showed the Boeing jet sharply dropping from an altitude of about 37,000 feet to 31,000 feet within just five minutes as it flew over the Andaman Sea. “Suddenly the aircraft starts tilting up and there was shaking so I started bracing for what was happening, and very suddenly there was a very dramatic drop so everyone seated and not wearing seatbelt was launched immediately into the ceiling,” Dzafran Azmir, a 28-year-old student on board the flight told Reuters. “Some people hit their heads on the baggage cabins overhead and dented it, they hit the places where lights and masks are and broke straight through it.” One person dead after severe turbulence on London-Singapore SIA flight SQ321 dropped about 6000 feet due to an air pocket. One person deadhttps://t.co/8C6Ya22B46 pic.twitter.com/YEK6CwvJPu — Andrew Darwis (@adarwis) May 21, 2024 Per CNN: Turbulence occurs when a plane flies through clashing bodies of air moving at widely different speeds. With light and moderate turbulence passengers might feel a strain against their seatbelt, and unsecured items could move around the cabin. But in severe cases turbulence can throw passengers around the cabin, causing severe injuries and occasionally death. In March 2023, severe turbulence on a private jet resulted in the death of a former White House official, just days after seven people were transported to hospitals after a separate commercial flight hit significant turbulence. In July 2023, seven people were injured on a Hawaiian Airlines flight to Sydney, Australia, when the plane was buffeted by severe turbulence, and 36 people were injured on a Hawaiian Airlines flight from Arizona to Honolulu in December 2022, with 20 people taken to emergency rooms.