At least 42 companies in the Fortune 100 pay for employees to travel for an abortion in states where it isn’t available, according to a new report from the Washington-based Ethics and Public Policy Center. Forty-two companies is likely an undercount because coverage for abortion travel is becoming standard in many health care plans for procedures not available nearby, according to the EPPC report from Alexandra Desanctis and Nathaniel Blake. Two other corporations suggest they also provide abortion travel coverage. Most of the companies that publicly affirmed coverage for abortion-related travel don’t provide public information on their child-care benefits. The cost of covering abortion is much cheaper for a corporation than paying for maternity leave, prenatal and maternal health care, child care, and the possibility of losing the employee, the report says. “If corporations are going to cover 100% of abortions and abortion travel while covering none or only a fraction of other costs, such as adoption, that really shows an anti-child and anti-family attitude,” said Blake, a fellow in the Life and Family Initiative at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.  After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022, many major corporations added abortion travel costs to employee benefits. Amazon announced in May 2022, following the leak of the high court’s draft opinion overturning Roe, that it would pay up to $4,000 in travel expenses for elective abortions if the procedure isn’t available within 100 miles of an employee’s home. Amazon offers up to 20 weeks of paid parental leave for women, whom the company refers to as “birthing parents,” including four weeks before birth. Amazon allows up to six weeks of paid leave for “supporting parents” and adoptive parents. Walmart, the nation’s largest private employer, announced Aug. 19, 2022, that it would expand health care plans to cover abortion travel expenses. Apple’s medical coverage plans include “fertility treatments” and egg-freezing as well as a lifetime maximum of $20,000 for in vitro fertilization. Apple’s existing benefits package allows employees to travel out of state for medical care if it is unavailable in their home state. This policy extends to travel for abortions, an Apple spokesperson told CNBC in 2012. “There was a tendency, in tech in particular, to treat [abortion] as somehow essential to women’s equality,” Blake told The Daily Signal. “It seemed like tech was really unanimous on not just funding abortion, but loudly saying that they fund abortion tourism.” UnitedHealth Group, the fourth-largest company in the United States by revenue, announced it would cover abortion travel expenses following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe and abortion on demand, sending the abortion issue back to states and state lawmakers. Drug store giant CVS pledged in 2022 to “continue to provide colleagues, clients, and consumers with the flexibility to choose medical and pharmacy benefits to best suit their needs.” “This includes, subject to plan terms and customer direction for self-funded plans, making out-of-state abortion health-care services more accessible and affordable,” CVS said in a statement. CVS has announced it will sell the abortion pill in states that allow it. The pharmacy company offers financial reimbursement or access to specialists related to fertility, egg-freezing, in vitro fertilization, surrogacy, and more. “They should not be funding commercial surrogacy because that is buying and selling babies literally, and it is also exploitative of women who are renting their wombs,” Blake said. “We’re constantly inundated with imagery from ‘The Handmaid’s Tale,’ but this is literally renting women for reproduction and corporations should not be doing that.” Though many corporations include abortion as a health care benefit, abortion isn’t health care, said Dr. Susan Bane, an OB-GYN and vice chair of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, or AAPLOG. “Central to the field of obstetrics and gynecology is the care of two patients—a maternal and fetal patient,” Bane told The Daily Signal. “This duty to care for both patients is evident in almost all we do in our clinical practice, except induced abortion—an intervention intended to terminate a pregnancy and that does not result in a live birth.”  “The purpose of medicine is for health and healing,” she said. “The direct and intentional killing of one of our patients accomplishes neither of these and is not health care.” The post Over 40 Fortune 100 Companies Cover Abortion Travel appeared first on The Daily Signal.

A vaunted Democrat "first" on election night now requires a Republican first in the upcoming 119th Congress: a resolution to ensure that men and women use the bathroom facilities designated for men and women, no matter what they may fancy themselves. Representative-elect Sarah McBride of Delaware became the first elected...

Tom Homan, President-elect Donald Trump's "border czar" nominee, threw down the gauntlet to Democrats who plan to defy Trump's mass deportation of illegal aliens, underscoring that to do so is a federal crime. Homan, who previously served as acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement during Trump‘s first term, said...

It was almost 15 years ago that billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates decided to weigh up the cost of keeping “terminally ill” Americans alive. In 2010 he suggested a “death panel” system be implemented in the [...] The post In 2010 Gates Suggested Implementing A ‘Death Panel’ System In The US appeared first on The People's Voice.

"I didn’t think I had it in me": Steven Wilson released a surprise Christmas song in 2023 after an unlikely challenge from a friend

On Monday, in a bipartisan move, the House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a bill that would ban contracts with Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro’s regime. Rep. Mike Waltz (R-FL). President-elect Donald Trump’s choice for national security advisor, and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) introduced the bill. “The BOLIVAR Act compliments existing sanctions by prohibiting the U.S. government from contracting with any person that has business operations with the illegitimate government of Nicolas Maduro, as well as any successor government of Venezuela not recognized as legitimate by the United States,” Waltz noted. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ “Venezuela is in crisis due to the illegitimate, authoritarian rule and the Marxist policies of Nicolas Maduro and his Caracas cartel,” Waltz stated. “Maduro and his cronies have mocked and ignored the electoral will of the Venezuelan people, inciting violent action against the democratic opposition. Our policy must be based on solidarity with the brave activists that strive to break the shackles of oppression and not provide aid and comfort to their oppressors. We must maintain existing sanctions against the regime and seek to expand sanctions to minimize Maduro’s resources to abuse the freedoms and prosperity of the Venezuelan people.  This legislation sends a clear and powerful message to Maduro, as well as other dictators around the world, that there will be no appeasement, there will be no tolerance, there will be no reward for their rogue, illegal actions. … I urge the Senate to quickly pass this important bill and send it to the President’s desk for his signature.” In September, Maduro ordered the arrest of presidential opponent Edmundo González Urrutia on grounds he had claimed that Maduro stole the election. Prosecutors charged him with “‘usurpation’ of public functions, ‘forgery’ of a public document, incitement to disobedience, sabotage, and ‘association’ with organized crime and financiers of ‘terrorism,'” according to AFP. “The head of an executive agency may not enter into a contract for the procurement of goods or services with any person that the head of an executive agency determines, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, knowingly engages in significant business operations with an authority of the Government of Venezuela that is not recognized as the legitimate Government of Venezuela by the United States,” H.R. 25 states.

When it’s time for a nap, a toddler will try anything to avoid the inevitable. This little guy has a unique concept but isn’t experienced enough to make it convincing. We’re unsure where he learned this trick, but his execution needs some practice. When you watch the video, you’ll probably need the sound way up because it is difficult to hear him. @britt_rae1 I want to remmeber these moments forever! #toddlersoftiktok #boymom #momsoftiktok #toddlerfunny #funnyvideos #naptime ♬ original sound – britt_rae1 Did you catch those cute little snorts? He tried to snore convincingly to fool his mom into thinking he was sleeping. The toddler did not fool his mom, who was still making him take a nap. The fake snoring and his insistence that he’d had a “perfect nap, make for an awesome memory. However, the sympathetic comments under the video were hilarious. The mom let the toddler get out of his nap when it was all said and done. She posted under a comment about giving in but not whether the toddler took a nap after receiving his reward. Sometimes, as parents, we just need to pick our battles. Image from TikTok. TikTok user Jeanette said, “I’m a witness to him having a perfect nap.” Rebecca T added, “C’mon lady….we can all see he napped TWICE!” Kristine B added the minutes from a meeting that supposedly occurred, “Tiktok aunties have met and upon conclusion of our meeting we have confirmed he did nap. In fact he napped 2 times so he gets to go outside twice.” Many commenters were on the toddler’s side, urging the mom to consider the nap complete. Some users were wishful, like Lynn Montemayor, who added, “Wish someone made me take naps for rewards.” If that were the case, many adults would happily take up the challenge of earning rewards for naps. You can find the source of this story’s featured image here. The post A Toddler’s Hilarious Attempt At Cheating The Nap System appeared first on InspireMore.