In 2015-16, we first observed the “Trump Boomerang Effect”, which essentially was this: anyone who would attack President Trump would see their attack fail and the attack would then “boomerang” and end up taking them down in the same fashion in which they aimed it at Trump. We saw it time and time again, so much so that we named it the “Trump Boomerang Effect”. Now we’re seeing it return, and it feels like 2016 all over again. The latest victim? It may soon be Fani Willis. The woman who launched a lawfare campaign against President Trump may soon see the Court system being her own demise. How absolutely poetic, don’t you think? Here’s what’s happening….. Fani was ordered by a Court to turn over all private communications she had with Jack Smith.  It was a Court Order, not a request or suggestion. And she has now openly defied that order: Fani Willis is STILL refusing to comply with a court order to turn over any private communications she had with Jack Smith. At what point does she become disbarred from practicing law in the state of Georgia? — Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) December 10, 2024 Kyle Becker had more details: Breaking News. Fulton County Superior Court has issued a default judgment against District Attorney Fani Willis for refusing to turn over records that could document her collusion with the J6 committee and Special Counsel Jack Smith. The court order states: “By finding the… pic.twitter.com/pipBiByFyW — Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 10, 2024 Breaking News. Fulton County Superior Court has issued a default judgment against District Attorney Fani Willis for refusing to turn over records that could document her collusion with the J6 committee and Special Counsel Jack Smith. The court order states: “By finding the Defendant in default, the Court has effectively declared that she violated the ORA [Open Records Act]. The Court further ORDERS the Defendant to conduct a thorough search of her records for responsive materials within five business days of this Order’s entry.” “Within the same five-day period, the Defendant is ORDERED to provide the Plaintiff with copies of all responsive records that are not legally exempt or excepted from disclosure. If the Defendant must or chooses to withhold any portion of a requested record, she is instructed to adhere to the procedures outlined in the ORA.” However, the Fulton County D.A. claims that such records don’t exist, potentially putting her at legal risk of perjury and obstruction of justice. The court makes it clear that it has substantive reason to believe Willis is withholding records: “Defendant is further ORDERED to provide an explanation why such correspondence does not exist in Defendant’s records (or why it is being withheld).” However, if Willis does turn over the records, it could provide proof of a criminal conspiracy. Oh, the irony. Here is swole Tom Fitton explaining exactly what’s happening here and what consequences she might face next: FANI WILLIS FOUND IN DEFAULT: Judicial Watch has filed FOIA lawsuits for 30 years, and never has a government official been found in default by a court for a simple open records lawsuit. This shows you where Fani’s competency/corruption is. @TomFittonhttps://t.co/RnaZp6gj6c pic.twitter.com/waoVDoYBOc — Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch) December 10, 2024 My take? She’s stuck between a rock and a hard place. Disclose the documents and risk incriminating herself. Fail to disclose and risk being in breach with the Court. No good option = the swift hammer of justice is coming! Here’s more from Judicial Watch: Judicial Watch announced today that the Superior Court in Fulton County entered an order granting a motion for default judgment against District Attorney Fani Willis in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit for communications Willis had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. In doing so, the court grants Judicial Watch’s request for attorneys’ fees and orders Willis to search for and provide releasable records to Judicial Watch within five business days. The March 2024 lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County, GA, after Willis and the county denied having any records responsive to an August 2023 Georgia Open Records Act (ORA) request for communications with the Special Counsel’s office and/or the January 6 Committee (Judicial Watch Inc. v. Fani Willis et al. (No. 24-CV-002805)). In its lawsuit Judicial Watch stated that Willis’ “representation about not having records responsive to the request is likely false.” Judicial Watch referred to a December 5, 2023, letter from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan to Willis that cites a December 2021 letter from Willis to then-House January 6 Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-MS). In that letter Willis requested assistance from the committee and offered to travel to DC. In May 2024, Judicial Watch asked the court to declare a default judgment, noting that Willis was served with the lawsuit in March 2024 and had “not filed an answer,” which “was due 30 days after service.” The recently issued default judgment states: “The Court finds Defendant [Willis, in her official capacity] is in default and has been since 11 April 2024.” Further, Willis “never moved to open default on any basis (not even during the period when she could have opened default as a matter of right), she never paid costs, and she never offered up a meritorious defense.” Plaintiff is thus entitled to judgment by default as if every item and paragraph of the complaint were supported by proper and sufficient evidence. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-55(a). Here, this means Plaintiff has established that Defendant violated the ORA by failing to either turn over responsive records or else notify Plaintiff of her decision to withhold some or all such records. In its complaint, Plaintiff sought the following relief: 1) a declaration that Defendant has violated the ORA; 2) an order for Defendant to search for all records responsive to Plaintiff’s request without further delay; 3) an injunction ordering Defendant to cease withholding non-exempt public records responsive to the request; 4) an award of attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-18-73(b); 5) a writ of mandamus, ordering Defendant to provide the requested records; and 6) any other relief the Court deems proper. By finding Defendant in default, the Court has in effect declared that she has violated the ORA. The Court also hereby ORDERS Defendant to conduct a diligent search of her records for responsive materials within five business days of the entry of this Order. Within that same five day period, Defendant is ORDERED to provide Plaintiff with copies of all responsive records that are not legally exempted or excepted from disclosure. If Defendant is required or decides to withhold all or part of a requested record, she should follow the procedures set forth in the ORA (see O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71(d)). If the records are stored electronically, they may be produced electronically in a commonly used format such as PDF. The Court expects that such production will include the correspondence identified by Plaintiff in its complaint. If it does not, Defendant is further ORDERED to provide an explanation why such correspondence does not exist in Defendant’s records (or why it is being withheld). Beyond that, no other relief, injunctive or otherwise, is necessary at this time (to include striking Defendant’s answer, which is of no effect based on the Court’s finding of default). The court set a hearing on the Judicial Watch’s attorneys fees award for December 20. “Fani Willis is something else. We’ve been doing this work for 30 years, and this is the first time in our experience a government official has been found in default for not showing up in court to answer an open records lawsuit,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “Judicial Watch looks forward to getting any documents from the Fani Willis operation about collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised ‘get-Trump’ prosecution.” Judicial Watch is assisted in the case by John Monroe of John Monroe Law in Georgia. Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump: In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans. (Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.) In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes. In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing. Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump. In his new book Rights and Freedoms in Peril Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton details a long chain of abuses officials and politicians have made against the American people and calls readers to battle for “the soul and survival of America.” RELATED REPORTS: BREAKING: Sources Say Georgia Supreme Court Set To Dismiss Fani Willis Case Against President Trump Did Fani Willis Wear Her Dress Backwards To Court? Before I go, you know I'm not leaving until I replay my favorite song of all time, right? Please enjoy: "Now I ain't sayin' she a vote rigger"#TrumpMugShot at Fulton County By the Memefellas of the Dilley Meme Team@Ramble_Rants @TAftermath2020 @MakaveliMemez @C3PMeme @Fuknutz pic.twitter.com/npHltFhIwC — Ramble_Rants (@ramble_rants) August 25, 2023 Backup here on YouTube at least for right now: Rumble Backup: I can't even pick a favorite line, so many good ones... If it's not the chorus  "But Fatty only make my lead bigger" then I think MAYBE it would have to be "You will see her at the Court House, Call Her Fatty Willis": Humor and satire always hit stronger than most anything else. Reaction is off the charts: Please share.

More than 30 former and present employees have accused a married couple, who own one of the biggest LGBTQ+ media companies in the world, of sexual misconduct and sexual assault.

Tomorrow, Christopher Wray is holding a press conference at 2 p.m. Our corrupt FBI Director will reportedly resign. The Washington Examiner‘s Kerry Picket reports he will be gone on or before the inauguration. Sources inside the bureau said he wants to leave before Donald Trump fires him. Our new incoming FBI director, Kash Patel, can […] The post Corrupt FBI Director Wray Is Expected to Resign, Maybe Tomorrow appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

One of the outlying symptoms of evil is to use broad-based rationalizations about systemic problems in order to justify individual acts of evil. The most recent example: the murder of Brian Thompson, a father who was the CEO of UnitedHealthcare. I know a lot of doctors who don’t like how UnitedHealthcare runs. They think UnitedHealthcare rips off customers and fights them at every turn. But whatever you think about U.S. health care is irrelevant to the question of whether Thompson should have been shot to death on the streets of New York. According to The Wall Street Journal, it appears the reading interests of Thompson’s alleged murderer started with ideas about activism but crossed over to an interest in violence at some point. He is an upper-class citizen from an upper-class family. He attended the University of Pennsylvania, where he majored in computer science and earned a master’s degree. So, he apparently has quite a high IQ. He also underwent some sort of recent serious health crisis, which, as The Wall Street Journal reports, was probably exacerbated by psychedelic use. He may have had a spinal fusion surgery, which has a very low rate of success; it often leaves people with significant pain for life. His friends said they had not heard from him for months. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show The alleged murderer also seems to have posted about the Unabomber’s manifesto on Goodreads. What he wrote offers a window into his mind and illuminates how people who have “social concerns” can start channeling those into acts of individual evil. The review reads:  Clearly written by a mathematics prodigy. Reads like a series of lemmas on the question of 21st century quality of life.  It’s easy to quickly and thoughtless write this off as the manifesto of a lunatic, in order to avoid facing some of the uncomfortable problems it identifies. But it’s simply impossible to ignore how prescient many of his predictions about modern society turned out. He was a violent individual – rightfully imprisoned – who maimed innocent people. While these actions tend to be characterized as those of a crazy luddite, however, they are more accurately seen as those of an extreme political revolutionary. The review also quotes someone who had written about Kaczynski in a Reddit thread, saying he “had the balls to recognize that peaceful protest has gotten us absolutely nowhere.” The commenter also wrote that “‘violence never solved anything’ is a statement uttered by cowards and predators.” The extreme political radicalism is obvious and suggests violence is justified because the system is unworkable and unfixable and because grievances are justified. Ironically, many of the same people who were presumably cheering on the alleged shooter in this case are in favor of a health care system that ends with lower life expectancy and actual government rationing of care. Yet there is something deeper, a sickness that is going on in our political class, best exemplified by the absolute nutjob Taylor Lorenz, who used to work for The Washington Post and for Vox. She was fired yesterday after proclaiming on Piers Morgan’s show that she felt actual joy when Thompson was murdered on the street. “I do believe in the sanctity of life,” she stated. “And I think that’s why I felt, along with so many other Americans, joy, unfortunately.” How can this make you joyful? Thompson was a father, and he was gunned down in the middle of Manhattan.  People in the United States who cheer for murderous criminals is nothing new. This has happened for a very long time in the United States. Bonnie and Clyde were made famous in a film. John Dillinger, who robbed some 24 banks with his gang, was widely proclaimed a folk hero in the 1930s by one segment of the population. You can easily see the logic of this extending to most aspects of free market enterprise in the United States, including health care, oil companies, banks, anything. If you don’t like the way a business is acting, this logic says you should shoot somebody. Why is that? Why is that happening? There is now an entire media and political class dedicated to a simple proposition: that America is so flawed and its systems are so corrupt that criminality is a reasonable response to those flaws. This is demagoguery. The way to change policy is by electing politicians. And then those politicians work with each other and with regulators at both the state and local levels in order to change the policy. Once you say that the system is so broken that the only resort is revolutionary violence, you have to make the case for overthrowing the entire system. But that’s not what these people are doing. It’s just nihilistic violence, lashing out at a system that these people believe is targeting them in some way. Why do they believe that? Because instead of saying the truth, which is that these systems are really complex and difficult to fix, there’s a whole class of demagogues in political office and in the media who spend their days saying that all problems are easily solved, but aren’t because there is an intractable coterie who want to keep people in misery for their own profit and they just don’t care. If they just cared more, then all would be solved. This is ugly, stupid, and not true. There may be those who are perfectly willing to keep people in misery for profit, but they are not the vast bulk of people in the United States or in positions of high power or in positions in high industry.  That is not how it works. This is a political strategy discussed by the philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, involving the idea that instead of making an argument against the policy a person is promoting, you ascribe bad motivations to that person. That person is evil. That person is wrong. And they are not just wrong, but they are motivated by a sociopathic evil. CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE The only way someone kills a man like Brian Thompson is by suggesting his motivation is not to keep the company working and operative in a very difficult regulatory environment with a bizarre system of subsidies and administrative details and so on. Instead of disagreeing with his decisions, someone says he’s evil and just trying to maximize profit. This attitude can be found on both sides of the political aisle. It is predominantly on the Left, but there is a swath of people on the Right who are also espousing this. And it’s ugly. I will say that there are elites who have lent credibility to this particular argument through their malfeasance. People like Anthony Fauci have told platonic lies to the American public, lying for their own purposes, and, in many cases, quashing their political opposition. But the generalized argument is made too much in politics, and it does boil the pot. It leads to an increasing temperature that justifies violence. It’s an argument that says the reason the health care system is a mess is because Brian Thompson is an evil person who is trying to kill grandma. It’s the same argument that says the reason the oil companies are attempting to pump more oil is not because there is high demand for carbon-based fossil fuels or because it’s still the most effective form of energy production on the planet, but because they don’t care about destroying the Earth. It’s an argument that says the reason the bank denied your loan is not because the bank looked at your loan, assessed the risk, and found it wasn’t worth the price; it’s because the bank manager is actually Mr. Potter and is trying to deny your bank loan because he himself is evil. And the argument is dangerous.

The NAACP attempted to use Marine veteran Daniel Penny’s acquittal to stir racial unrest on X, and immediately got hit with a community note laying out several key points explaining why race had absolutely no bearing on that case. Penny was acquitted on Monday in the death of Jordan Neely, a black man who had a relatively impressive rap sheet before he began behaving erratically and threatening people on a New York City subway. Penny stepped in to stop him, briefly placing Neely in a choke hold — and while he died later, Neely was alive when police arrived on the scene. The NAACP shared a CNN report on the acquittal and added the following commentary: “The acquittal of Daniel Penny in the death of Jordan Neely has effectively given license for vigilante justice to be waged on the Black community without consequence. It’s a painful reminder of the inequities in our justice system. Jordan deserved compassion. Instead, he was met with violence. We stand with his family in calling for accountability.” The acquittal of Daniel Penny in the death of Jordan Neely has effectively given license for vigilante justice to be waged on the Black community without consequence. It's a painful reminder of the inequities in our justice system. Jordan deserved compassion. Instead, he was met… https://t.co/JOdxjZJXBi — NAACP (@NAACP) December 9, 2024 The response from Community Notes was as thorough as it was quick: “Daniel Penny did not act alone in defending himself and others from Neely. A black man can be clearly seen assisting Penny to subdue Neely. A black woman testified in defense of Penny. There is no evidence that Penny was motivated by race,” the note read — and included video showing proof that at least one black man had aided Penny in restraining Neely. “It should be noted that another black man attempted to restrain Jordan Neely,” the video was captioned. “This event was not racial nor was the verdict. If you wanted to show compassion to Mr. Neely it should’ve [come] during the 100+ prior times he was arrested. He was a danger to his community. Just a fact.” It should be noted that another black man attempted to restrain Jordan Neely This event was not racial nor was the verdict. If you wanted to show compassion to Mr. Neely it should've came during the 100+ prior times he was arrested. He was a danger to his community. Just a fact. pic.twitter.com/zqlkTHl1GD — Clint Russell (@LibertyLockPod) December 9, 2024 Sage Steele also responded to the NAACP, adding, “Stop. Please read/stop ignoring the facts of the case. Not only is your claim of racism inaccurate, it’s divisive, and it causes the @NAACP to lose even more credibility, which affects those in need when racism is actually taking place.” CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE Stop. Please read/stop ignoring the facts of the case. Not only is your claim of racism inaccurate, it’s divisive, and it causes the @NAACP to lose even more credibility, which affects those in need when racism is actually taking place. https://t.co/db2JNNN0lF — Sage Steele (@sagesteele) December 9, 2024

The Biden-Harris Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced today that it would offer work permit extensions to newly arrived migrants, even as the vast majority of jobs have gone to immigrants for the past five years. The new rule from the DHS drastically increases the extension period for certain migrants’ work permit renewal from up to 180 days to up to 540 days. “Now we learn that the agency intends to increase temporary work permits from 180 days to 540 days,” Immigration Subcommittee Chairman Tom McClintock (R-CA) said in a recent hearing, addressing the new policy. “If anyone wonders why real wages for working families have declined under this administration, look no further than the agency before us today.” One report from the Center for Immigration Studies indicated that the vast majority of jobs have gone to foreign-born residents since 2019. The study, published in June, explained that data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates that 971,000 more natural-born Americans were employed in May of 2024 than were in 2019. For foreign-born residents, however, “It is true that the country has added millions of jobs since the height of Covid,” the analysis states. “However, most of that employment growth has gone to immigrants, both legal and illegal.” DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas argues that the new rule will benefit the American economy. “Increasing the automatic extension period for certain employment authorization documents will help eliminate red tape that burdens employers,” Mayorkas stated, also contending that it will “further strengthen our nation’s robust economy.” “USCIS is committed to reducing unnecessary barriers and burdens in the immigration system to support our nation’s economy,” added Ur M. Jaddou, the Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. “This final rule will help U.S. employers better retain their workers and help prevent workers with timely-filed EAD renewal applications from experiencing lapses in their employment authorization and employment authorization documentation through no fault of their own.” Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni notes however that natural-born Americans lost 800,000 jobs in the last year while foreign-born residents gained more than 1 million jobs. “The US labor market is turning into a temp agency for foreign workers,” he wrote.

A senior FBI official testified to Congress on Tuesday that the bureau is completely flummoxed by suspected drones flying over New Jersey that have yet to be identified, causing a stir among residents and prompting officials to demand answers. The FBI and other agencies are investigating a growing number of sightings, including near the Picatinny Arsenal military research center and President-elect Donald Trump’s golf club in Bedminster, which have been happening for weeks now. WATCH: @RepPfluger asked CBP, FBI, & DOJ witnesses what we're all wondering—"What is going on in New Jersey?" pic.twitter.com/mCaF9dN1EZ — House Homeland GOP (@HomelandGOP) December 10, 2024 “What is going on in New Jersey?” House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Law Enforcement, and Intelligence Chairman August Pfluger (R-TX) asked Robert Wheeler Jr., the FBI’s assistant director of the Critical Incident Response Group, during a hearing on Capitol Hill. CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE Wheeler said the FBI is “actively investigating” the “unexplained sighting of drone activity” over New Jersey, including “proximity to sensitive sights and areas of concern,” and stressed investigators “do not attribute that to an individual or group yet.” Pfluger asked if there are “nefarious intentions” that could lead to a national security or public safety incident that could put Americans at risk. Wheeler replied, “There is nothing that is known that would lead me to say that. And that’s the concerning part.” RELATED: Authorities Taking Mysterious UFO Sightings In New Jersey ‘Deadly Seriously,’ Governor Says Noting that there have been other “incidents,” including last year when “unknown drones” were flying over Langley Air Force Base in Virginia, Pfluger then asked “why can’t we take action” against drones flying over sensitive sites. “Authority exists to mitigate a UAS in flight when authorized, and that could certainly apply to a sensitive site,” Wheeler said, using the acronym for unmanned aircraft systems. He also suggested it would be a decision for the Department of Defense. Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) shared that a Coast Guard officer said a 47-foot boat “was followed by between 12 and 30 of these drones as they went through the water.” The lawmaker said he wants to know why drones are not shot down over water. Actual Jersey Shore: A Commanding Officer in New Jersey Coast Guard told Rep. Chris Smith his 47-foot ship “was followed by between 12 and 30 of these drones as they went through the water — followed, right behind them,” Smith told FBI, DOJ & CBP officials today. https://t.co/gnQRacslgc pic.twitter.com/avbizOtblL — Matt Laslo (@MattLaslo) December 10, 2024 Wheeler testified alongside Keith Jones, the deputy executive assistant commissioner of Air and Marine Operations for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and Deputy Assistant Attorney General for National Security Brad Wiegmann. Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX) also pressed Wheeler, saying, “You’re telling me we don’t know what the hell these drones are in New Jersey. Is that correct? ” After Wheeler responded with, “That’s right,” Gonzales declared, “That’s crazy. … That’s madness that we don’t know what these drones are.” Suspected drones or UAS have also been spotted in the vicinity of Staten Island and Brooklyn, where there is a power plant, Coast Guard base, and military installation, Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) said during the hearing. Today, I joined @HomelandGOP demanding answers from the FBI and its partner agencies regarding the unidentified drones and unmanned aircrafts flying over NY & NJ, as well as the lack of action taken by these agencies to intervene. I will continue to press them to get answers &… pic.twitter.com/ufjTMf86B3 — Office of Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (@RepMalliotakis) December 10, 2024   Picking up on Wheeler saying officials do not know of any threats, Malliotakis asked him if there is “still a possibility” of there being one. Wheeler said “yes” to the question. He also said he did not know whether the sightings could be related to tests of security technologies for emergency responders. Watch the full hearing below:

The King of Pop‘s only daughter, Paris Jackson, is getting married. The 26-year-old confirmed her engagement to music producer Justin Long on Instagram. In addition to sharing a sweet birthday message with Justin, Paris included a few shots from the proposal and a sneak peek at her ring. Interestingly, the couple didn’t choose a flash diamond. They opted for something a bit more unique. Justin Long gave Paris Jackson a lab-grown diamond engagement ring. The choice fits the couple’s aesthetic, which relies heavily on sustainability and is earth-friendly. Instagram Paris Jackson Chose A Leader in Lab-Grown Diamonds To Help Design Her Ring The stone is large and elegant but not over-the-top. It looked beautiful on Paris’ hand, and she very clearly loves the ring and Justin. Paris tagged Jean Dousset in her engagement post, crediting the brand with helping design her portrait-cut ring. Jean Dousset shared well wishes with the couple, “Congratulations @parisjackson and @thejustinlong. Thrilled to have been part of this special journey in creating your engagement ring. It was an exciting creative process bringing all the meaningful, symbolic details to life. Feeling the love jackpot!” View this post on Instagram A post shared by ?? (@parisjackson) In addition to sharing her ring, Paris Jackson gave followers a glimpse into her life with Justin. She wrote, “happy birthday my sweet blue. doing life with you these last years has been an indescribable whirlwind and i couldn’t dream of anyone more perfect for me to do it all with. thank you for letting me be yours. i love you.” Fans wished Paris and Justin Someone wrote, “This man LOVES you. Shows you be his face and yours! Blessed.” A fan agreed, “Damn!! This is beautiful!!! You both are GORGEOUS!!!” Friend Elliot Mintz wrote, “Happy birthday, Justin. I have witnessed the love the two of you share over the last two years….and recognize ‘forever’ when I see it. my congratulations and blessings.” This story’s featured image is by Dave Benett/Getty Images for Fashion Trust Arabia. The post Paris Jackson’s New Fiancé Gave Her A  Sustainable Ring—See The Gorgeous Sparkler appeared first on InspireMore.