Ever since President-elect Donald Trump made the surprising announcement that he intends to nominate veteran and Fox News host Pete Hegseth to be Secretary of Defense, the media has tried to portray him as a troublesome right-wing culture warrior. However, MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell took things one step further on Wednesday as she spread straight up fake news about Hegseth. With the context being that Hegseth has said he opposes putting women in combat roles, Mitchell told Sen. Chris Van Hollen, “Finally, the choice of Fox News host and military veteran Pete Hegseth as the Defense Secretary. He has denounced diversity, equity, and inclusion. He disagrees with women in combat. I don't know what he would say to Senator Duckworth, you know, and all the other women pilots, some of whom, like Senator Duckworth, you know, were grievously wounded in combat. But women have been a key part of piloting these fighter jets, and this goes back more than a decade. So, this would not be viewed a vote on until it would get to the floor if it gets out of committee.”     Here is what Hegseth actually said about female pilots: “Gimme a female pilot all day long. I have no issues with that.” It was also clear that Hegseth was talking about roles in the special forces “where strength is a differentiator.” For his part, Van Hollen was happy to play along, “Yeah, a very troubling history of statements like that. We know that women can perform incredibly ably in our military like Senator Tammy Duckworth did. So, this is concerning just as the early conversation you were having is concering where the president would try to, sort of, just pick generals with personal loyalty to him, not to the Constitution. People who are, sort of, more political cronies rather than people are best for our national security.” It is one thing to ask what Hegseth’s strategic vision for the country and the Pentagon are or if he can make the jump from TV host to massive bureaucratic administrator, but making things up about him is quite another. Here is a transcript for the November 13 show: MSNBC Andrea Mitchell Reports 11/13/2024 12:35 AM ET ANDREA MITCHELL: Finally, the choice of Fox News host and military veteran Pete Hegseth as the Defense Secretary. He has denounced diversity, equity, and inclusion. He disagrees with women in combat. I don't know what he would say to Senator Duckworth, you know, and all the other women pilots, some of whom, like Senator Duckworth, you know, were grievously wounded in combat. But women have been a key part of piloting these fighter jets, and this goes back more than a decade. So, this would not be viewed a vote on until it would get to the floor if it gets out of committee. CHRIS VAN HOLLEN: Yeah, a very troubling history of statements like that. We know that women can perform incredibly ably in our military like Senator Tammy Duckworth did. So, this is concerning just as the early conversation you were having is concering where the president would try to, sort of, just pick generals with personal loyalty to him, not to the Constitution. People who are, sort of, more political cronies rather than people are best for our national security.

This magazine aims to help you discover new frontiers and highlights people who are already exploring and building within them. We live in a country that governs as though the frontier were long dead. A bureaucratic mindset, burdensome rules and regulations, “expert” control, and woke capital and its oppressive ideology constrain the thoughts and actions of millions of Americans. Our fenced-in culture rehashes the same tired themes with diminishing impact, while strictly policing anything created outside its boundaries. We write for those who hold out the possibility that, in the sound of the winds blowing through the trees in the canyon, the waters flowing over rock, no less than the stillness of the desert itself, we might yet hear the voice of God. The result is that people of all kinds and from all walks of life feel today as if there is no remaining space in their lives left open to conquer, explore, and build within. And if such a thing exists somewhere, they feel they are prevented from finding it. There may be no wall preventing people from across the world from entering America, but there are many walls that seem to block Americans themselves from finding new and better ways of life in the 21st century within their own country. Yet we are still Americans, and the frontier is always with us, if only in our hearts and minds. Many yearn for it, and some search for it still. Throughout the nation, there is a commercial-cultural movement of visionaries and builders alike who have found new frontiers and are creating and working freely within them. And a related return is now underway in search of deeper wisdom, as well as spiritual sustenance. This movement doesn’t yet have a name, and our media and institutions are hiding it from view. Frontier exists to show it to you. There’s a reason it’s hidden. Established orders don’t want you to see this rising tide for what it is, and they want to keep selling you the same ideas and products, in the same rickety old framework, and maintain their position. But men like “Buffalo Bill” Cody both made the frontier and told (and sold) its story simultaneously. This is the American way. We exist to tell it—and inspire you to make it. A Pioneering Spirit Eric Grandado The most famous American historian of the frontier, Frederick Jackson Turner, wrote that “frontier” once meant, “in general, the boundary that separates contiguous states.” The analog in nature is where the field meets the forest, or the ocean meets the sand. The word’s etymology points back to the front or face of a person that is not a façade but simply reveals him. In Europe, a frontier was a line, a nation’s front-facing border, or outer limit, of a nation. But Turner, in his 1899 entry for “Frontier” in Johnson’s Cyclopedia, also wrote that “in a more restricted sense, employed especially in the U. S.”, ‘frontier’ meant something different. In America, the frontier was not a line, but a space. A space beyond official borderlines. Not an empty space, but one defined by the geographic landscapes of America and the peoples who roamed across them. More specifically, the frontier was an area that was not yet settled: “In the reports of the U.S. census the frontier-line has been defined as the inland line limiting the area which has an average, county by county, of two or more inhabitants to the square mile. This area is called the settled area.” These sparse territories were not the frontier, exactly, but expanded behind it. As Turner put it, “Between this census frontier-line and the Indian country the belt of territory sparsely occupied by Indian traders, hunters, miners, ranchmen, backwoodsmen, and adventurers of all sorts, constitutes the traditional frontier.” In America, the frontier referred to the “outlying regions which at different stages of the country’s development have been but imperfectly settled, and have constituted the meeting-ground of savagery and civilization”; the frontier was on “the outskirts of civilization, the regions but partially reclaimed from savagery by the pioneer.” The American frontier was not a mere boundary but a place, not a line but a region. And this notion of frontier came to define what America was for the entire world. In the 1700s, George Washington was internationally known for his early exploits on the frontier. However, he became the greatest American of the century because he answered the unsettled question of governance in America, fathering a nation that would long outlast him. In the 1800s, William “Buffalo Bill” Cody, gained notoriety for his early exploits settling the unsettled West. He became the most famous American in the world owing to his traveling show, which revealed that frontier to the world, inspiring a century of mass media depictions long after he died. That Western American frontier of a certain time and place is gone. But it is this region, this kind of place, that we desperately need to find within ourselves and within our nation once again. Who Will Build the Future? Peter Gietl What is at stake in the region of any frontier is this question: Who will ultimately settle and shape it, and how? Just outside the “settled areas” of habit and experience within ourselves, we each find “the meeting-ground of savagery and civilization.” This, too, is never an empty space: its contours arise from our human nature, our specific personality, and where and how we live our lives. Like any geographic frontier, this space within is neither good nor bad of its own accord, but the cutting-edge potential and never-ending battle within us to explore, build, and develop ourselves—or devolve into addiction, vice, and evil. We cannot find this inner frontier when we are habituated to self-harm and then self-medication to numb the results, immersed in screens, hypnotizing ourselves into slumber rather than exploring, confronting, conquering, and building in the very real frontier within ourselves. But as Marshall McLuhan once said, “’Numbed to death by booze and tranquilizers’ is an average strategy for ‘keeping in touch’ with a runaway world.” If we don’t escape the screens and find an inner frontier, we can’t question the distortions within us. As unthinking products of our environment and civilization, we don’t own or control ourselves and can’t reshape ourselves for the better. As McLuhan also said: Since in any situation 10 percent of the events cause 90 percent, we ignore the 10 percent and are stunned by the 90 percent. Without an anti-environment, all environments are invisible. The role of the artist is to create anti-environments as a means of perception and adjustment. In other words, like the proverbial fish, we can’t see the water we are swimming in if we don’t get out of it from time to time. Great artists, leaders, and visionaries strain to do this in both healthy and destructive ways. They explore and inhabit unsettled territory and, in so doing, are sometimes able to look clearly at their society and its way of life and critique it with fresh eyes. All human beings who seek fulfilling lives need to do the same from time to time. If they cannot, they wither and eventually long for death. The desire for an “anti-environment” can lead us into darkness or into the light. The desire for emptiness and silence amidst the noise must not devolve into a retreat from reality into nothingness, into nihilism, or Western civilization’s increasing desire for suicide. As James Poulos explains in “Freakout at the Final Frontier,” “There is no such void, no proper hiding place. It is even more artificial and far more unreal an escape than the first hiding place stitched together from fig leaves among the trees of Eden.” But each of us needs silence still—to grow and shape ourselves we need purposeful time in the wilderness, and we depend on leaders who have spent time being formed there. The most complete natural wilderness is the desert, where Christ was tempted, and the Desert Fathers made their home. The sea and the space between the planets and stars are similar. Here all other aspects of life fade away. In the wilderness, you battle and shape yourself. As Poulos writes, “The longing for empty spaces—the lure of the desert, not the void—is an answer to the perpetual call to purification, from all the distraction and delusion to which our senses and our passions, no matter how well-intentioned, always tempt us.” But this is purifying precisely because isolation is not natural to us. While we rightly desire purification for its own sake, as we desire our own happiness, we also need that purification in order to build a better human society and to better live within it. The time of decline in which we live requires refounding and rebuilding. It is only on the frontier that we can not only radically reconsider how we live but also begin to live differently. The frontier is not simply a wilderness; it is a space to recreate and reform our civilization. The Borders of Reality In part, this is because of necessity. To live in an actual, geographic frontier outside of civilization requires us to pay closer attention to how we obtain the basic necessities of life, which means paying more attention to the natural world and its rhythms. Similarly, if we can find space to question the way of life we each live now without thinking and by default—as defined for us by the rest of society and culture—we are suddenly forced to confront ourselves and our own human nature. But the frontier also enables us to experiment, to build differently, and to correct mistakes and wrong turns long since made by settlements and established cities. We live by habit, and move within the paths, streets, and highways that custom and the architecture of civilization have built up over the centuries. If the ancient city has built wrongly somewhere along the line, and for many years, it seems impossible to change. We write for those who refuse to accept incompetence and decay and still seek excellence—who seek work and love alike with meaning and higher purpose. But this is not so on the frontier. Here, one can look back on civilization and bypass any stifling layers built on wrong turns. For while savagery may meet civilization on the frontier, all civilizations decay and descend into refined savagery over time, while praising the descent into savagery as progress. Adjacent to civilization, the frontier allows its inhabitants to rethink principles and purposes, and to reconceive how things might be done best. We bring our habits and knowledge from civilization and are free to reapply them and channel what’s good, drop what’s bad, and attempt to develop new and better models of living.And it is this frontier that we are still interested in finding and settling in the 21st century. Our survival may depend upon it.The Outlaw American Spirit Martin Jernberg On the frontier you will find grifters, losers, criminals, and con men, along with many others who are not comfortable or successful in “civilized” society. But you will also find visionaries, builders, missionaries, and individuals and families seeking a better way of life. You will find new institutions, new ways of doing things, new ways to live well.Those who thrive on the frontier disagree—often radically—about the vision for the future they are working towards. In fact, these disagreements are often the ones that matter most, and are much more salient than the stale old disputes among people droning on in “normal” society. This is to say that the people and the movements we highlight for you here will often not agree, and we may not agree with them, or even among ourselves.For instance, Chris Rufo and Matt Taibbi do not agree on politics, but both dissent from settled opinion. In order to pioneer new thought and action, one must first get past the obstacles now in our way.In, “Behind the Twitter Files,” Taibbi describes what led to the historic series of Twitter threads published after Elon Musk’s purchase of the social media platform. “At the end of that first day my head was spinning. What had been a relatively minor story about Twitter’s private censorship of a New York Post report on Hunter Biden’s laptop now looked like it might be of major, even historic importance, and involve a range of government agencies.”The Twitter Files would go on to reveal the extent of censorship and control the federal government was exercising on legacy media. Twitter, subsequently transformed into X, is now one of the only remaining free speech frontiers in media, with profound effects on the national elections and other matters of great importance in this volatile and historic year.In Peter Gietl’s interview of Rufo (“The Godfather”) after his successful effort to fire the president of Harvard University for plagiarism, Gietl reveals a model of a man attacking the most powerful institutions in America from outside the settled areas while also rebuilding alternatives. It is perhaps no coincidence that Rufo spent five years documenting people’s lives in the forgotten cities of Youngstown, Ohio, Memphis, Tennessee, and Stockton, California, and says “I have learned more from the streets than in any classroom.”On the frontier, those who are truly successful and build well carry with them deeper purposes from civilizations gone wrong, and they often seek to save their history and ideals from destruction. This is the difference, as Glenn Beck explains, between the success of the Plymouth colony and the failure of Jamestown. While many know Beck as a “media figure,” fewer understand that he is a man on a mission to save the American story, which means preserving our historic artifacts from civilizational decline, come what may. Any righteous settlement of the future will require saving the past from present destruction:The story is who we are. Our story is being destroyed right now, being rewritten in real-time. We must paint, film, learn to tell, and collect the story of America.The freshness one encounters when entering unsettled areas often makes a return to something older, deeper, and higher possible. The American frontier was and still is a place where one can look directly into the great cathedral of nature, as Katarina Bradford reminds us the great American conservationist John Muir once did: “Muir was, first and foremost, a man driven by the sacred.”But the spirit of the frontier allows us to look directly into our human nature. Against the rising “Cyborg Theocracy,” our technological advancement gone awry, Mary Harrington works back, in her article “Cannibalizing Feminism,” through our basic understandings of men, women, sexuality, and our own happiness. In “Anti-Natalism and the Impossibility of Consent," Emma Waters chooses life and rediscovers the gift of life and family that must be sought for itself, as simply good, rather than for the sake of GDP and the stuff of white papers. And Josh Centers points to his own modern family’s turn back towards ancient wisdom, ever new, and the divine in “Take Me to Church.”At the same time, the frontier requires an appreciation that “developed” societies lose for the hard work that makes them possible.Mark Levin tells us how he “learned to admire people who work hard, and who work with their hands,” who are “among the most important people in supporting our way of life”– that is, “the people who make America work.” These are the forgotten people whose virtues that are now essential to respect and recover if we are to build anew. In “Blue Collar Blues,” Joe Allen, now writing for a living, recounts what he learned while engaged in such work. In the aftermath of a hurricane, Auron MacIntyre rethinks our “learned helplessness” to take basic care of ourselves and our families, and the necessity of developing tight-knit local communities.Yet we also are in desperate need of innovation and new enterprises. Underneath the tottering edifice of California, now a one-party state that people and businesses are exiting by the year, Isaac Simpson finds the driven young men who are building the bold companies of the future. From literally making rain and fire (in this case, plentiful and inexpensive nuclear power), their startups aim to compete against the bloated, corrupt prime contractors that hose up billions annually from the federal government: “these guys are a little too young and handsome to be this angry, yet conversations often turn to success as the best revenge.”Finally, in the midst of all our current political madness, there is also a renaissance in recreation: new poetry (McLuhan, Yarvin), new TV shows (Dusty Bluffs), new video games (Prudentialist), a new return to fitness (photo essay), new food (Rhinehart) that nourishes us, new spirits (bourbon review) that soothe our own, and a new consideration of the best places to drink them (Bedford).A New American Era Martin Jernberg Volatility will increase in America. But we write for all those who seek truth, goodness, and beauty, regardless.We write for all those who dissent, who question The Narrative and The Discourse and the systems of control that created them.We write for those who refuse to accept incompetence and decay and still seek excellence—who seek work and love alike with meaning and higher purpose.We write for those who still love the human and seek to perpetuate and enrich humanity rather than snuff it out.We write for all those who simply want to find and live a better way of life.We write for those who hold out the possibility that, in the sound of the winds blowing through the trees in the canyon, the waters flowing over rock, no less than the stillness of the desert itself, we might yet hear the voice of God.You are not alone. We are not alone. Welcome to Frontier.Matthew J. Peterson is Editor in Chief of Blaze News.

After perhaps the most contentious presidential election season in modern history, Americans were finally gifted a moment of peace and comity when President-elect Donald Trump joined President Joe Biden in the Oval Office on Wednesday.Last week, Trump crushed Biden's vice president, Kamala Harris, both in the popular vote and the Electoral College, meaning that in just a few weeks, he will return to office to serve a second term.'Politics is tough, and it's, in many cases, not a very nice world, but it is a nice world today.'To signal the beginning of the transition to the next administration, Biden invited Trump to a friendly meeting in the Oval Office, and Trump agreed.On Wednesday, with a blazing fire as a backdrop, the two former political foes shook hands warmly and exchanged pleasantries.Addressing Trump as "Mr. President" and acknowledging him as a "former president," Biden congratulated Trump on his recent victory and promised a "smooth transition" in the days and weeks to come."We're gonna do everything we can to make sure you're accommodated, what you need," Biden said."Welcome. Welcome back," he added to the man he recently called "the greatest threat to our democracy."Trump graciously accepted Biden's remarks and offered a few conciliatory statements of his own."Politics is tough, and it's, in many cases, not a very nice world," Trump replied, "but it is a nice world today, and I appreciate it very much." — (@) Shortly after their brief exchange, rancor arose among a group of reporters who were also gathered in the Oval Office. While some attempted to ask questions, the two presidents ignored the noise and instead smiled at one another as though laughing at an inside joke, another clip showed.Notably absent at the White House Wednesday was once and future first lady Melania Trump. Reports indicated that first lady Jill Biden invited Mrs. Trump for a meeting, but a statement from Melania's office confirmed that she would not attend."Mrs. Trump will not be attending today’s meeting at the White House," her office said in a statement posted to X. "Her husband’s return to the Oval Office to commence the transition process is encouraging, and she wishes him great success."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Disney actress Rachel Zegler said she was "heartbroken" over Donald Trump winning the election and urged her fans not to use Elon Musk's platform X due to his support of the president.In a series of social media stories on Instagram, the "Snow White" actress said the election results left her "speechless.""Another four years of hatred, leaning us towards a world I do not want to live in," the 23-year-old opined. "Leaning us towards a world that will be hard to raise my daughter in. leaning us towards a world that will force her to have a baby she doesn't want. leaning us towards a world that is fearful."On top of admitting she shouldn't be shocked, the actress said she was "heartbroken" for her friends who woke up fearful the morning after the election. She expressed to her fans that she is "here" for them should they need to "cry," "yell," or "hug.""The left continues to fail us in forging a new path forward. this loss should not have been. and it certainly should not have been by so many votes," she waxed on.'There is no help, no counsel, in any of them.'Zegler's tone turned darker as she said she agreed with the sentiment that "more than anything," Trump supporters, voters, and Trump himself should "never know peace."Adding to the long-held Democratic Party claim that Trump is a threat to democracy, Zegler said there is a "deep, deep sickness" in the United States, proven by the tens of millions of people who voted for Trump. She also called the number of people who support Trump "terrifying," saying they are subscribing to a "false sense of security, of masculinity, of intelligence, of patriotism, and of humanity.""There is no help, no counsel, in any of them," Zegler said of Trump supporters. "I could go on. i won't. i feel sad. you probably do, too. f*** this." The young actress also urged her followers not to use Musk's platform because he "helped get that man elected," accusing those who are on X of "giving [Musk] business." The New Jersey-born star has frequently rejected backlash for her commentary, attributing it to prejudice related to her ethnicity.She said in October 2023 that those speaking against her were doing so because she is one of the many "fearless and loud" Latino performers who are "loud about having seats at the tables they deserve to be at." The same account that posted Zegler's recent anti-Trump rant also noted her recent hyperbolic post describing why she was voting for Vice President Kamala Harris."I'm voting for kamala harris because either she or donald trump will be president come january, and if hillary clinton (another deeply flawed candidate) had won in 2016, roe v. wade would be law today and women who are now dead from treatable pregnancy complications would be alive," she claimed.In addition, she also implied that the Republican ticket believes "trans people and immigrants are the root" of the nation's problems. Zegler also suggested that the National Guard would be unjustly deployed on protesters if Trump wins."If [Kamala] loses, i worry i may never vote again."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

On Monday, June 17, 2024, Alexis Nungaray received news that would shake any loving parent to the core. Her daughter, Jocelyn Nungaray, was murdered and thrown in a bayou of water underneath a creek. Jocelyn was only 12 years old when she walked to the corner store to grab a soda, where she was taken and then murdered by two illegal Venezuelan immigrants: Johan Jose Martinez Rangel, 22, and Franklin Pena Ramos, 26 years old. Border Patrol had apprehended Johan Martinez near El Paso on March 14, but he was promptly released the same day on an order of recognizance with a notice to appear. On May 28, Franklin Pena was also apprehended before being let go on a promise to appear in court at a later date. Not three weeks later, they took Jocelyn’s life. “The hard facts of reality is there will unfortunately be more Jocelyns, but that’s why I’m being so courageous, and that’s why I’m using my voice, since her voice was viciously ripped away from her,” Nungaray tells Alex Stein of “Prime Time with Alex Stein.” “This unfortunately is a desperate wakeup call that this country needs to realize that Jocelyn needs to be the last Jocelyn. She needs to be the last child for this to happen,” she continues. Stein is horrified, especially considering the Biden administration’s “catch and release” program allowed these two immigrants — who had Venezuelan gang affiliations — to roam freely on the streets of the United States. “The fact is, they’re letting people come into this country unvetted, and a lot of these people have gang affiliations, and both of these guys had gang affiliations,” Stein says. After the pair murdered Jocelyn in cold blood, one of the immigrants attempted to change his appearance to go under the radar. “He had a full beard, and once he was watching the news with the still shots on them, he completely shaved his face clean, and he thought that was going to be the bandaid over his mistake, but it didn’t work because he was still caught within days of them doing what they did to her,” Nungaray explains. While liberals have remained steadfast in their claim that illegal aliens deserve to be here, Stein doesn’t think they truly understand that this can and will affect them negatively. “This is a serious issue that you can be affected by. Doesn’t matter your political leaning, it doesn’t matter your race, your ethnicity, you can be affected by this,” Stein says. “It’s just, you never know who can be a victim.” Want more from Alex Stein?To enjoy more of Alex's culture jamming, comedic monologues, skits, and street segments, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

UFC legend Jorge Masvidal said that his support of President Donald Trump comes from years of watching him push his own thoughts and ideas forward, while other politicians were bought off.Masvidal is of Cuban descent and has defended Trump for years while condemning Democrats, saying they are slowly creeping toward communism.During election coverage on the night of the Republican victory, Masvidal was asked by podcast host Patrick Bet-David why he likes Trump so much."2015/16 I started seeing him do his thing, and he said one thing right in the beginning that caught my eye," Masvidal began. "That was, he said nobody was in his pockets. He said he was in all these politicians' pockets [and] he got them to do whatever he wanted to do, and nobody was ever in his pocket. He paid everybody off."The fighter, who is the inaugural "Baddest Motherf***er" (BMF) champion in the UFC, added that it has been Trump's individuality and willingness to push his own ideas that has led to his near decade-long support. "He was coming into the game with his own ideas, his own thoughts, and nobody could buy him. When I heard that I was like, 'This is a man that if he says what he's going to do, it's going to be the best thing for us.'"'This is one person with his own thoughts, and he loves America.'The fighter told Bet-David that there are no "secret corporations" controlling the president behind the scenes and no foreign governments he is beholden to. "This is one person with his own thoughts, and he loves America, that's how long I've been rocking with Trump. I love this guy."In 2023, Masvidal defended Trump in the face of indictments in New York City, likening the charges to the actions of communist governments."My family has lived through it, and history has told us that this is a play right out of the communist playbook," Masvidal said at the time.The 40-year-old warned that if the charges went through on Trump, there was no telling where government persecution would stop. "This has been done before in history, and every time it's happened, it only gets worse. We can't let the left take over," Masvidal warned.Masvidal lost fought in July in a boxing match against fellow UFC legend Nate Diaz, losing in a decision.In September, Masvidal said he was eyeing a UFC comeback. He is still under contract with the organization, and according to ESPN, told the UFC he wants to fight No.1-ranked middleweight Leon Edwards.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

I’ve spent years of my life traveling across Azeroth, fighting people, demons, monsters, boars, and murlocs in World of Warcraft. It’s been a long and glorious adventure, but there’s always been a problem. The one thing that’s always been missing, especially when you compare WoW to other MMOs like Lord of the Rings Online, Final Fantasy 14, or the Elder Scrolls Online, is the lack of player housing. There’s never been anywhere to call home, but after more than two decades, that’s about to change. In the next expansion, World of Warcraft Midnight, player housing will finally arrive. Continue reading Over 20 years after launch, World of Warcraft will finally get player housing MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best MMORPGs, WoW The War Within review, The best WoW addons

When life gets a bit too stressful, do you ever wish that you could build yourself your own little utopia away from all the chaos? Do you wish that utopia was on a floating island above that you can gracefully pilot through the clouds? And do you wish that you could co-habit that island with alpacas? Well, you’ll soon be able to (virtually) make those wishes a reality with Aloft, a brand new survival game from Astrolabe Interactive and Funcom, which just announced its early access launch date. Continue reading Sky-high sandbox survival game Aloft locks in early access launch date MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best survival games, Best farming games, Best sandbox games

Tiresome 'The View' Panel Spreads Misinformation on Pete Hegseth Without Correction

A 'NY Times' Young Undecided Voter Shares What Radicalized Her to Pull the Lever for Trump