Is the Lovely Mrs. Fetterman Not As Impressed As the Rest of Us With John Ver. 2.0?

In a world where the bond between humans and animals often goes unnoticed‚ Kevin Richardson’s story stands out among the crowd. Kevin‚ a man with a heart as big as the African savannah‚ made a life-changing decision seven years ago. He rescued two lion cubs‚ Meg and Amy‚ from a fate unknown‚ nurturing them with... The post Man reunites with lions he saved as cubs 7 years later and films the encounter appeared first on Animal Channel.

On Sunday‚ ABC’s Martha Raddatz tried and failed to get Gen. Charles Brown to attack Donald Trump as he tries to pull a Grover Cleveland and return to the presidency. On Wednesday‚ it was CNN’s Poppy Harlow’s turn to try to get someone to denounce Trump. However not only did Harlow‚ like Raddatz‚ fail‚ but NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg actually had positive things to say about Trump. Harlow teed up a clip of Trump by declaring that he “is likely the Republican nominee for president. He has been very clear how he feels about NATO. He reiterated that feeling just a couple days ago. Listen to this.”     Trump was then shown at a rally telling the crowd “We're paying for NATO‚ and we don't get so much out of it. And‚ you know‚ I hate to tell you this about NATO. If we ever needed their help‚ let's say we were attacked‚ I don't believe they'd be there.” Harlow then asked “You look at the Trump campaign website‚ Mr. Secretary General‚ it says‚ quote‚ ‘we have to finish the process that we began under my administration of fundamentally re-evaluating NATO's purpose and NATO's mission.’ Would a second Trump presidency concern you about the future of U.S. membership in NATO? NATO did come to the defense of the United States after 9/11‚ but Stoltenberg refused to be drawn into American electoral contests “I believe that the United States will continue to be a staunch NATO ally regardless of the outcome of the U.S. elections because it is in the U.S. interest to have a strong –” After Harlow interrupted to add “Even under President Trump?” Stoltenberg recalled his time working with Trump‚ arguing he highlighted a very real problem and got results‚ “Well‚ I worked with him for four years and I listened carefully because the main criticism has been about NATO allies spending too little on NATO and the message has been taken across the alliance in Europe and Canada.” Stoltenberg elaborated‚ “So‚ over the last years‚ NATO allies have significantly increased defense spending. More and more allies meet the NATO guideline on spending two percent of GDP on defense. Poland is actually spending four percent of GDP‚ no other allies spending more than that. And in total‚ they have added 450 billion extra for defense. So‚ the message from the United States that the European allies have to step up has been understood and they are now really moving in the right direction and that strengthens also the transatlantic bond within the alliance.” Earlier in the interview‚ Harlow tried to get Stoltenberg to go after another Republican‚ “Just earlier this week you said‚ quote‚ ‘I'm confident that all NATO allies‚ including the United States‚ will continue to provide support to Ukraine.’ And I wonder if you are still confident in that after your meeting with Speaker Johnson yesterday. Stoltenberg said he was while acknowledging and respecting the Congressional back-and-forth over the “important and difficult” issue of border security. Here is a transcript for the January 31 show: CNN This Morning 1/31/2024 7:17 AM ET POPPY HARLOW: Just earlier this week you said‚ quote‚ “I'm confident that all NATO allies‚ including the United States‚ will continue to provide support to Ukraine.” And I wonder if you are still confident in that after your meeting with Speaker Johnson yesterday. JENS STOLTENBERG: Yes‚ I continue to expect that also the United States will find a way to support Ukraine‚ because that is in the security interest of the United States. If President Putin wins in Ukraine‚ it will embolden him‚ but also other authoritarian leaders to use military force. Today‚ it is Ukraine‚ tomorrow it could be Taiwan. And when I visited the Hill yesterday‚ I met many politicians from both parties‚ and I saw broad support for Ukraine‚ but then‚ of course‚ there is this link to the border issue‚ which I respect is an important and difficult issue‚ but I believe it's possible to find a way forward to support Ukraine‚ regardless of how the border issue is handled. HARLOW: If you could take us inside that meeting with Speaker Johnson‚ what did he say that made you so confident‚ like that this would be separated and he thinks the border deal has no path forward‚ so it would be separate and that funding would come for Ukraine? STOLTENBERG: Well‚ the Speaker and I‚ we agreed a joint statement where we clearly stated that President Putin must not win the war in Ukraine. And the only way to prevent President Putin from winning is to provide support. And we all hoped for more advances in the offensive the Ukrainians launched last year‚ but we need to also remember where the whole thing started when the full-fledged invasion happened in 2022. Most experts expected that Russia would take control over Kyiv within days‚ and the rest of Ukraine within weeks. That did not happen. The Ukrainians have liberated 50 percent of the land Russia occupied in the beginning. They have opened the corridor in the Black Sea‚ pushing back the Russian fleet. And they are inflicting heavy losses on the Russian Armed Forces. So‚ with a fraction of the U.S. defense budget‚ significant combat capabilities of the Russian Army has been destroyed. So‚ our support is making a difference on the ground every day. … HARLOW: Former President Trump is likely the Republican nominee for president. He has been very clear how he feels about NATO. He reiterated that feeling just a couple days ago. Listen to this. DONALD TRUMP: We're paying for NATO‚ and we don't get so much out of it. And‚ you know‚ I hate to tell you this about NATO. If we ever needed their help‚ let's say we were attacked‚ I don't believe they'd be there. HARLOW: You look at the Trump campaign website‚ Mr. Secretary General‚ it says‚ quote‚ “we have to finish the process that we began under my administration of fundamentally re-evaluating NATO's purpose and NATO's mission.” Would a second Trump presidency concern you about the future of U.S. membership in NATO? STOLTENBERG: I believe that the United States will continue to be a staunch NATO ally regardless of the outcome of the U.S. elections because it is in the U.S. interest to have a strong – HARLOW: Even under President Trump? STOLTENBERG: Well‚ I worked with him for four years and I listened carefully because the main criticism has been about NATO allies spending too little on NATO and the message has been taken across the alliance in Europe and Canada. So‚ over the last years‚ NATO allies have significantly increased defense spending. More and more allies meet the NATO guideline on spending two percent of GDP on defense. Poland is actually spending four percent of GDP‚ no other allies spending more than that. And in total‚ they have added 450 billion extra for defense. So‚ the message from the United States that the European allies have to step up has been understood and they are now really moving in the right direction and that strengthens also the transatlantic bond within the alliance.

Leftist Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella made clear in an interview on artificial intelligence (A.I.) that Microsoft will be fixated on fighting so-called disinformation in the 2024 election. Nadella told NBC anchor Lester Holt on the Jan. 30 edition of NBC Nightly News that the tech industry was putting in a lot of work to build the technology to “identify the issues around disinformation and misinformation.” Holt had put a question to Nadella on how he planned to deal with the “first A.I. election‚” asking Nadella if he was nervous about “how A.I. Can help and how it may be weaponized?" The CEO of the censor-happy company gave a concerning answer. “This is not the first election where we dealt with disinformation or propaganda campaigns by adversaries and election interference‚” said Nadella‚ before elaborating on techniques his company employs. “We're doing all the work across the tech industry around watermarking‚ detecting deep fakes and content IDs. There is going to be enough and more technology quite frankly in order to be able to identify the issues around disinformation and misinformation.”     MRC Free Speech America Director Michael Morris‚ however‚ called out Nadella for his comments‚ given infamously leftist Microsoft’s terrible track record on free speech. Morris said‚ “The left often hides behind the veneer of providing for public safety when in actuality they intend to step on Americans’ freedoms. Suggesting that technology will be utilized to protect against election interference‚ Nadella appears to use the in-vogue words ‘mis-’ and ‘disinformation’ here as a dog whistle of sorts to do precisely that in calling for what will likely ultimately amount to more censorship.” Microsoft has a history of pushing censorship. In fact‚ the head of Microsoft’s Xbox division Phil Spencer once proclaimed that “Xbox Live is not a free speech platform‚” before whining that users were more free to act on social media platforms. Additionally‚ a then-Microsoft product program manager Dare Obasanjo‚ once publicly clamored in 2019 for Facebook to remove 80 percent of Fox News’s and The Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro’s videos from the platform.  Microsoft-owned social networking site LinkedIn locked 2024 Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy out of his account. In Vivek’s case‚ as well as a number of others‚ LinkedIn censored free speech to protect environmentalist talking points on “climate change.”    As for A.I.‚ Microsoft has invested $10 billion into OpenAI‚ the parent company of ChatGPT. If ChatGPT’s track record of left-wing bias is any indication of the path Microsoft will take the technology in 2024‚ Americans should be concerned. Eric Spitznagel of The New York Post documented repeated instances of ChatGPT demonstrating a leftist bias and refusing to provide requested responses to non-politically correct prompts.  Conservatives are under attack! Contact your representatives and demand government agencies and Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency‚ clarity on so-called hate speech and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored‚ contact us at the Media Research Center contact form‚ and help us hold Big Tech accountable

I feel like if you work at a school called “Catholic University‚” you should know what things are and aren’t “Catholic.” Melissa Goldberg‚ a now former psychology lecturer at the Catholic University in Washington D.C.‚ was let go after she invited a self-declared “abortion doula” to give a lesson on helping a “birthing person” get an abortion. Carbonneau is the founder and CEO of the doula company Family Ways. A doula’s role is usually to help provide physical and emotional support to women giving birth. Whether it’s before‚ during or after the actual birthing process‚ a traditional doula role is to help mom and baby.  Doulas‚ as Catholic News Agency noted‚ also have been known to help women through miscarriages. Carbonneau‚ however‚ talked about a doula’s role as a support during an abortion.  A student who attended the January 23 lecture by Rachel Carbonneau recorded the lesson in which Carbonneau was heard saying that the “goal for a lot of providers is to try to perform the abortion before the baby’s nerve endings are formed...at a time when the baby is not going to feel any pain.” She also referred to a pregnant lady as a “birthing person.”  I wonder if she knew she was at a Catholic university before she said something so obviously against biblical teachings. Here’s what Catholic News Agency reported about when Carbonnneau was challenged by a student in the class: When asked by a student to expand on her use of the term “birthing persons‚” Carbonneau said that she works with clients who identify as transgender. “Birthing person” is a term transgender advocates often use to avoid gendered language such as “woman” or “mother.” According to the audio recording‚ the “abortion doula” also talked about helping “pregnant men” deliver in what she called a “seahorse birth.” Related: Catholic All-Girls College to Admit Transgender Girls (Men) For Fall 2024 When word broke‚ Catholic University President Peter Kilpatrick sent an email indicating that the professor’s contract was “terminated” over inviting Carbonneau. “As a Catholic institution‚ we are committed to promoting the full truth of the human person and to protecting human life from conception to natural death. In our rigorous pursuit of truth and justice‚ we engage at times with arguments or ideologies contrary to reason or to the Gospel‚” Kilpatrick noted including‚ “But we do so fully confident in the clarity given by the combined lights of reason and faith‚ and we commit to never advocate for sin or to give moral equivalence to error.” Needless to say‚ Carbonneau was advocating for sin (abortion) and Goldberg‚ who’s equally at fault for inviting her‚ was doing the same. Catholic University also told The Daily Signal that “The guest speaker will not be speaking again to the class‚ and we are re-communicating the terms and expectations by which all outside speakers are vetted and invited.” Let’s hope they stick to their word. Follow us on Twitter/X: Woke of The Weak: Cutting Off Genitals &; Songs About Pronouns Does anyone else feel like the pool of crazies is getting larger? These wackos are doing their best to make that argument for us. pic.twitter.com/syyaJuFPY2 — MRCTV (@mrctv) January 30‚ 2024

In anticipation of the start of Black History Month on Wednesday‚ ABC’s The View decried “the downward spiral of black Republicans” and smeared ALL of them as “grifters” that would betray America and their race for “power.” They singled out South Carolina Senator Tim Scott‚ mocking and ripping his engagement to a white woman and claimed he would choose to placate former President “Trump’s ego” over the Constitution. They spoke with race baiter and author Clay Cane about his new anti-black Republican book: “The Grift: The Downward Spiral of Black Republicans from the Party of Lincoln to the Cult of Trump.” Moderator and racist‚ Whoopi Goldberg suggested that since “Black History Month starts tomorrow” Cane’s book “should be required reading.” Teeing up her guest‚ Goldberg agreed that “grifters” was “the right word for them.” Cane‚ a liberal extremist‚ said he was “so saddened at the direction” black Republicans were going. He went on to argue that black Republicans were providing no benefit to the black community: And when you think about the original black Republicans‚ they were the first progressives. They were the ones that pushed Abraham Lincoln into emancipation. They were the ones who forced him into glory. After the Civil War‚ they are forming communities that will help black folks and poor white folks. “So‚ I wanted to examine how did black Republicans go from Frederick Douglass to Clarence Thomas‚” he huffed. Without evidence‚ he asserted that black Republicans would do “anything to get access to power‚ even if it means demeaning your own community.”     The focal point for most of their racist hatred during the segment was directed at Senator Scott. Co-host Joy Behar‚ who once claimed Scott didn’t know what it was like to be a black man in America‚ said it was “horrible to watch” a “strong black man” like him “shamelessly groveling” before Trump. “I didn't like it at all. And can you explain how -- what happened to him?” she asked Cane. According to Cane‚ Scott had “gone full-blown down grifter road‚” with Behar adding that Scott was “So desperate for the power.” Behar and Cane then attacked Scott’s recent engagement to a white woman. They mocked how their names rhymed and suggested he only decided to marry her because it was good optics for a shot at being vice president: BEHAR: And also‚ this other business that he recently got engaged. CANE: Ah‚ Timothy and Mindy. [Laughter] BEHAR: Timmy and Minnie. That's because he wants the job as VP‚ right? So‚ the engagement was a good way to say‚ “Hey‚ I'm going to be married. I'm going to be legit. I can be a vice president to Trump.” CANE: I mean‚ it's so obvious. It's clear as day that he's saying‚ “Pick me I want to be the vice presidential pick.”   Cane mocks Scott's engagement to a white woman and claims Scott would betray America for "power at any cost."Whoopi called Scott "a looney tune." Sunny Hostin falsely claims he "insulted" her when he was on the show (meanwhile‚ all they do is insult him). pic.twitter.com/nglOMU8ruN — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) January 31‚ 2024   Last week‚ staunchly racist and anti-Semitic co-host Sunny Hostin insisted that Scott’s engagement proved he was a puppet of white people. The conversation took a break with Goldberg calling Scott a “looney tune” for denying that America was inherently racist. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: ABC’s The View January 31‚ 2024 11:37:41 a.m. Eastern WHOOPI GOLDBERG: Welcome back. Black History Month starts tomorrow and there’s a new book that should be required reading called The Grift: The Downward Spiral of Black Republicans from the Party of Lincoln to the Cult of Trump. JOY BEHAR: Wow. GOLDBERG: Yeah. SUNNY HOSTIN: Yeah. GOLDBERG: Please welcome author‚ Clay Cane. HOSTIN: Yes. CLAY CANE: Thank you. Thank you. BEHAR: Let's hear this. GOLDBERG: You know‚ I listened to it‚ and I was -- it knocked me out so I'm show glad you're here today because you describe the current era of black Republicans as “grifters” and I say that's the right word for them. HOSTIN: Yeah. GOLDBERG: But you need to explain to people what you mean when you say it and what made you decide to write this book? CANE: Well‚ first and foremost I wrote this book because I care about this country and I've been so saddened at the direction that it's going in under the Republican Party. It really broke my heart. And when you think about the original black Republicans‚ they were the first progressives. They were the ones that pushed Abraham Lincoln into emancipation. They were the ones who forced him into glory. After the Civil War they are forming communities that will help black folks and poor white folks. So‚ I wanted to examine how did black Republicans go from Frederick Douglass to Clarence Thomas. HOSTIN: Yeah. CANE: How did we get here? How did we get here? And so‚ what I realize is now the current version‚ they are grifters. And what I mean by that is somebody who is hustling and scheming that will say anything and do anything to get access to power‚ even if it means demeaning your own community. And in many way‚ they provide racial cover for the issues in the Republican Party. So‚ this book is also about the downward spiral of racial politics in the GOP. (…) 11:42:26 a.m. Eastern BEHAR: Let's talk about Tim Scott. CANE: Ah‚ Tim. HOSTIN: Yes. BEHAR: Because we saw him shamelessly groveling the other day‚ telling Trump that he loves him. It was really kind of – [makes groveling sound] CANE: “I just love you.” BEHAR: It was horrible to watch‚ to tell you the truth‚ to see a strong black man grovel like that. I was very -- I didn't like it at all. And can you explain how -- what happened to him? CANE: It's interesting. He exists before and after the Trump era. And he has gone full blown down grifter road. BEHAR: So desperate for the power. CANE: Exactly. What's sad about Tim Scott is that I think he knows that if he called out the bigotry in his own party versus endorsing a bigot for president‚ he knows they would throw him out faster than Liz Cheney. BEHAR: Probably. CANE: And being that he knows that‚ that's why it's a grift because he knows better. He knows better‚ it's conscious. BEHAR: It's pathetic to watch. CANE:  Yeah. BEHAR: And also‚ this other business that he recently got engaged. CANE: Ah‚ Timothy and Mindy. [Laughter] BEHAR: Timmy and Minnie. That's because he wants the job as VP‚ right? So‚ the engagement was a good way to say‚ “Hey‚ I'm going to be married. I'm going to be legit. I can be a vice president to Trump.” CANE: I mean‚ it's so obvious. It's clear as day that he's saying‚ “pick me I want to be the vice presidential pick.” But what scares me is that‚ if for some reason he was‚ Tim Scott‚ I believe‚ would show Trump the loyalty that Mike Pence didn't. GOLDBERG: Did not. That’s right. CANE: And if Tim Scott had to choose between the Constitution and Trump's ego‚ what do you think he's going to choose? BEHAR: What is the matter with him? What is the matter? CANE: Access to power at any cost. SARA HAINES: Mike Pence actually looks better right now. I didn’t even think about that. HOSITN: He’s a grifter. CANE: And let's not forget he voted against the Voting Rights Act‚ gutted the George Floyd Policing Act‚ came on this very show and denied systemic racism. HOSTIN: Insulted me. Yes‚ he did. Yes‚ he did. GOLDBERG: I was here too. HOSTIN: You came behind me and we both looked at him like he was crazy. GOLDBERG: He was a looney tune. CANE: [Laughter] (…)

The Department of Defense recently held a staff event discussing the "rise of far-right terrorism" in America‚ according to a Tuesday report by the Daily Caller News Foundation.The DCNF revealed that the Pentagon launched a new "brown bag events" series featuring both internal and guest speakers. An email invitation obtained by the outlet appeared to invite "all" staff with the DOD's Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict office‚ also known as the SO/LIC.Bruce Hoffman‚ a professor at Georgetown University and senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations‚ and Jacob Ware‚ a research fellow at the CFR‚ were invited by the Pentagon to discuss their book titled "God‚ Guns‚ and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America." "Reminder to please join us at 1200 tomorrow morning via Teams (link below) for this virtual brown bag book talk event — renowned terrorism scholars Dr. Bruce Hoffman and Jacob Ware‚" read the invitation obtained by DCNF."This is the first of what we hope will be a series of brown bag events featuring internal and external speakers‚" it continued. "This talk‚ derived from the speakers' new book‚ God‚ Guns‚ and Sedition (Columbia Univ. Press) discusses the rise of far-right terrorism in the United States‚ the impact of U.S. domestic terrorism on our foreign policy and our allies‚ and policy recommendations to counter far-right terrorism."The email invitation included information about the book and a link to the authors' biographies.A description of the book on the CFR's website states‚ "Shocking acts of terrorism have erupted from violent American far-right extremists in recent years‚ including the 2015 mass murder at a historic Black church in Charleston and the January 6‚ 2021‚ attack on the U.S. Capitol. These incidents‚ however‚ are neither novel nor unprecedented. They are the latest flashpoints in a process that has been unfolding for decades‚ in which vast conspiracy theories and radical ideologies such as white supremacism‚ racism‚ antisemitism‚ xenophobia‚ and hostility to government converge into a deadly threat to democracy."The recently released book purports to account for the "rise of far-right terrorism in the United States — and how to counter it." During a podcast interview in early January‚ Hoffman defined and explained "far-right terrorism.""One of the challenges we had in researching the book is we're talking about a vast movement with many different constituent parts‚ not a hierarchical single organization‚ and that's been part of the movement's strength is that it is consistently over decades‚ one could argue over a century and a half‚ has sought to appeal to an increasingly diverse constituency. You have the Ku Klux Klan types‚ racists‚ anti-Semites‚ xenophobes‚ anti-LGBTQ‚ and so on‚" Hoffman stated. "We're talking about people that are militantly opposed to paying federal income tax‚ that militant zealous adherence to the Second Amendment‚ that believe that there is an ongoing attempt by the federal government to seize their arms. So a diverse array of people‚ conspiracy theorists‚ militant‚ anti-globalists‚ and so on that come together to comprise this movement."It is unclear who approved the book discussion event‚ the DCNF reported. The outlet noted that domestic terrorism is outside the DOD's purview. Neither the DOD‚ Hoffman‚ nor Ware responded to the DCNF's requests for comment regarding the event.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Pop star Taylor Swift’s relationship with Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce has been the topic of plenty of contention lately. Fans complain that they don’t care to watch the games if the cameras are going to be focused on Swift in the stands instead of the players on the field. However‚ Front Office Sports estimates that Swift has had greater than a $300 million impact on the Chiefs and the NFL’s bottom line. Shannon Sharpe believes Swift’s presence is a smart move for the Chiefs. “Y’all need to understand. NFL playing chess‚ y’all playing checkers. Y’all talking about stop playing Taylor Swift‚” Sharpe says‚ adding that "she’s bringing a different demographic and a new set of eyeballs.” Sharpe also notes that while he loves artists like Beyonce who have played Super Bowl halftime shows in the past‚ “Beyonce ain't moving the needle like this chick.” “She’s the closest thing to moving the needle like Michael Jackson that we’ve seen‚” he adds. Jason Whitlock agrees with Sharpe. “I agree with Shannon as it relates to Taylor Swift moving the needle more than Beyonce‚” Whitlock tells Shemeka Michelle. “I don’t think she’s remotely in the same stratosphere as Michael Jackson.” “When Michael Jackson died‚ he did look like a skinny white woman‚ so that is maybe what they have in common‚” Michelle adds. To hear the full conversation‚ watch the clip belowWant more from Jason Whitlock?To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture‚ faith‚ sports‚ and comedy with Jason Whitlock‚ subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America‚ defend the Constitution‚ and live the American dream.

The pharmaceutical industry for 60 years failed to produce a safe RSV vaccine‚ following a botched attempt in the 1960s. We’ve all lived with this virus‚ and most babies afflicted with it are treated easily with a nebulizer. Yet suddenly‚ the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control have approved three different vaccines — all for different demographics — at warp speed (ahem)‚ despite serious safety concerns. Now‚ pharmacies are carelessly mixing up each type of vaccine and even giving children the adult version because‚ when it comes to vaccines‚ “it’s all good.” When it comes to vaccination‚ we are being sold a bill of goods that it’s all or nothing — but if you know what’s good for you‚ it better be all. The FDA last year approved RSV shots for three different groups: GSK’s Arexvy and Pfizer’s Abrysvo for seniors over 60; Pfizer’s Abrysvo variant for pregnant women; and AstraZeneca’s Nirsevimab‚ a monoclonal antibody‚ for newborn babies. They all have serious problems. Last week‚ the CDC issued an alert warning that more than 150 women and babies have been administered the wrong shot — and those are just the ones we know about. According to a report from the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy‚ 25 babies were given Pfizer’s RSV shot for pregnant women or GSK’s shot for seniors‚ while at least 128 pregnant women were given the senior shot!The tragic irony is that members of the CDC’s own Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices raised questions about the fact that this shot “can overstimulate the immune system‚ which is why it is only used for the elderly or immunocompromised.” Set aside the fact that any drug that “overstimulates” the immune system probably should never be approved for anyone after all we’ve seen with COVID and all the associated problems with neuropathies and autoimmune disorders stemming from such overstimulation. But now we know that this shot was given to pregnant women. Can you imagine the long-term effects of overstimulation in an unborn baby? According to FDA briefing documents‚ two people in the Pfizer RSV trial for people over 60 experienced a dangerous form of neuropathy known as Guillain-Barré syndrome. The rate was 1 in 9‚000‚ which is bad enough. But we’ve seen from COVID that GBS is a known reaction to the jab‚ and Bell’s palsy‚ a similar form of neuropathy‚ has racked up 16‚755 entries in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Of course‚ we know that the shot for pregnant women is just as problematic as the one for seniors‚ so maybe it doesn’t make a difference which potion they received. GSK was forced to abort its version due to preterm and neonatal deaths during clinical trials. Pfizer’s shot‚ which was approved last summer‚ has the same safety signals. No matter. We’re off to the races jabbing as many pregnant women as can be guilted into it. Red-state health departments have an obligation to begin auditing the CDC vaccine schedule — beginning with this wretched RSV vaccine. The CDC recently reported that 13.1% of pregnant women had received the Abrysvo vaccine since the product went to market in the fall‚ while nearly 21% of mothers of eligible infants (8 months and older) reported they accepted the experimental shot for their babies. Another 27% reported that they “definitely plan” to vaccinate their children. That means half the babies in the country are on their way to getting this shot‚ as if we’ve learned nothing from the past few years. The disgusting carelessness of the industry in giving people the wrong shots is emblematic of a culture that treats vaccination as more of a religious ritual than a medical procedure. When it comes to medical procedures‚ we don’t categorically offer them to every living human as if “it’s all good.” We don’t give everyone pre-emptive drugs‚ surgeries‚ or chemotherapy. Asking someone if he’s pro- or antivaccine is like asking whether he’s pro- or anti-surgery. There is a time and a place even for proven interventions. They must be precise and tailor-made to individuals. Vaccination is no different. Yet we are being sold a bill of goods that it is all or nothing — but if you know what’s good for you‚ it better be all. Just get the ever-increasing litany of jabs‚ and if they happen to throw in a few extra doses of the wrong potion‚ no biggie. This is why every time someone wants a tetanus shot‚ they add the quite unnecessary diphtheria vaccine‚ because … well‚ why not? It’s all good! In 1983‚ the CDC's vaccine schedule included just three routine vaccines: diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis; measles‚ mumps‚ and rubella; and the oral polio vaccine. Not surprisingly‚ once the industry was indemnified from liability under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act‚ the number of vaccinations steadily grew. Now‚ the CDC has 17 routine vaccines of 90 doses for children. We created the below image to help visualize the CDC's vaccine schedule (and only until 12 months of age) pre-1986 Act (which gave pharma companies immunity for vaccine injuries) and today. — (@) Congress extended the liability shield for childhood vaccines to pregnant patients under the 21st Century Cures Act‚ with the proviso that the CDC recommends it. Including the new RSV shot‚ pregnant women are now under pressure to get five different shots. We’re still assessing the damage from the COVID shots. We may not know for decades how many people died needlessly. We will feel the effects of countless miscarriages‚ stillbirths‚ fertility problems‚ and birth defects for generations. We already have 3‚000 reports of injuries from the RSV shots reported to VAERS‚ according to data Dr. Jessica Rose sent me. How can we continue to trust the CDC when we absolutely know it is harming us? It’s really just a question of which of the vaccines are bad. The CDC is using “One Health‚” a World Health Organization concept that would impose a centrally controlled system of enforcement‚ surveillance‚ and incentives on every human being. The goal is to replicate and expand the COVID regime to impose mass vaccination and a host of economic and social objectives in the name of public health. If you thought the last “emergency” was bad‚ just you wait. It is simply indefensible for red-state health departments to adopt One Health. They have an obligation to begin auditing the CDC vaccine schedule — beginning with this wretched RSV vaccine.

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor told law students on Monday that she lives in "frustration" over rulings from the high court's conservative majority.Under former President Donald Trump‚ the Supreme Court experienced a generational ideological shift because Trump was able to appoint three conservative-leaning justices. Under that 6-3 majority‚ the conservative-leaning justices have protected Second Amendment rights‚ rolled back affirmative action‚ and protected unborn lives by overturning Roe v. Wade. These decisions were not born out of ideological political bias. Rather‚ fundamental differences regarding the interpretation of the law and the role of government undergird the decisions.Sotomayor‚ speaking to students at UC-Berkeley School of Law‚ admitted that "every loss" leaves her "traumatize[d].""I live in frustration‚" Sotomayor admitted. "And as you heard‚ every loss truly traumatizes me in my stomach and in my heart. But I have to get up the next morning and keep on fighting." Sotomayor: 'I live in frustration' after Supreme Court rulings www.youtube.com The court's senior liberal-leaning justice claimed her "originalist colleagues" — referring to the court's conservative-leaning justices — are coming up with "new ways to interpret the Constitution" and thus are changing some interpretations "that some of us believed were well established‚" the San Francisco Chronicle reported. Sotomayor‚ however‚ didn't provide any examples of these "new interpretations." Differences aside‚ Sotomayor reaffirmed that she and her colleagues are friends. She even went out of her way to praise Justice Clarence Thomas‚ who she said "is the only justice who knows the name of every employee on the Supreme Court."Sotomayor is not the first liberal-leaning justice to defend Thomas.As progressive activists targeted Thomas last year with allegations of ethical violations — none of which stuck — former Justice Stephen Breyer spoke out in defense of Thomas."As far as I’m concerned‚ I sat next to him on the bench for 28 years. I like him. He’s a friend of mine. I’ve never seen him do anything underhanded or say anything underhanded‚" Breyer said. "My personal point of view is he’s a man of integrity."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!