CNN senior political analyst Nia-Malika Henderson admitted to an amused Dana Bash that President Joe Biden’s messaging going into the 2024 election cycle has fallen rather flat — in fact‚ she said it was often simply “a noun and a verb and January 6.” Henderson made the comment during a Wednesday appearance on CNN’s “Inside Politics‚” where she explained that the Biden team was going to have to find a way to make things “fresher” if they expected to hold onto the White House past 2024. Referring to former President Donald Trump — who won the Iowa caucuses handily on Monday evening — as a “wounded candidate‚” Henderson said Biden still needed to be prepared to fight. WATCH: CNN's Dana Bash Busts Out Laughing When Reporter Calls Biden Strategy 'A Noun And A Verb And January 6' https://t.co/QSsJnsM2KM via @mediaite pic.twitter.com/kIV9RUyCPR — Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@tommyxtopher) January 17‚ 2024 “I think if you’re Biden‚ you can look at what Chris Christie said‚ those comments‚ that is an ad in and of itself‚ the idea that this is a battle for the soul of America‚ something that Joe Biden said back in 2020‚” she said — but she noted that the Biden team‚ tying Trump to the Capitol riot on January 6th‚ 2021‚ had already repeated that argument ad nauseam. “So‚ listen‚ you know‚ I think this argument around democracy is a‚ it’s an argument they made recently. It’s an argument they made going into 2022‚” she said. “They do have to figure out a way to make it fresher. Right? Because it can’t just be a noun and a verb and January 6th‚ right?” Bash responded with a laugh as Henderson added‚ “It’s got to be much broader than that. And they’re clearly trying to connect it to day-to-day issues.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP At the end of the segment‚ Bash reminded the audience that Henderson was using Biden’s own jab against him — one he used during a 2008 primary debate to slam then-Republican candidate Rudy Giuliani for referencing his own experience as Mayor of New York City at the time of the September 11 terrorist attacks. “Rudy Giuliani. There’s only three things he mentions in sentence: a noun‚ and a verb‚ and 9/11‚” he said at the time. "Rudy Giuliani. There's only three things he mentions in sentence: a noun‚ and a verb‚ and 9/11." — Joe Biden‚ 10/30/2007 pic.twitter.com/ho4MHEcPf1 — Howard Mortman (@HowardMortman) December 15‚ 2023 Because of Biden’s tendency to repeat the same stories over and over again‚ Henderson was not the first to use that construction against him. Jim Treacher‚ in 2021‚ posted‚ “Joe Biden once said of Rudy Giuliani: ‘Every sentence he says has three things: a noun‚ a verb‚ and 9/11.’ Well‚ every sentence Biden says has a noun‚ a verb‚ and his son dying of cancer.” Joe Biden once said of Rudy Giuliani: "Every sentence he says has three things: a noun‚ a verb‚ and 9/11." Well‚ every sentence Biden says has a noun‚ a verb‚ and his son dying of cancer. https://t.co/WAdCHQA7eY — jimtreacher.substack.com (@jtLOL) August 30‚ 2021

Pakistan threatened the Islamic Republic of Iran with “serious consequences” on Wednesday after Iran fired missiles and drones into the country that it claimed were aimed at militant bases near the border. The strikes reportedly targeted two bases of the militant group Jaish al-Adl after it mounted attacks against Iranian forces on the Pakistan-Iran border. Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry said that the attack resulted “in [the] death of two innocent children while injuring three girls‚” adding that the violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty was “completely unacceptable and can have serious consequences.” “It is even more concerning that this illegal act has taken place despite the existence of several channels of communication between Pakistan and Iran‚” the statement said. “Pakistan’s strong protest has already been lodged with the concerned senior official in the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Tehran. Additionally‚ the Iranian Charge d’affaires has been called to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to convey our strongest condemnation of this blatant violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty and that the responsibility for the consequences will lie squarely with Iran.” Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani told his counterpart in Iran on Wednesday that the incident has caused “serious damage to bilateral ties between Pakistan and Iran” and that Pakistan reserves the right “to respond to this provocative act.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Iran’s attacks inside Pakistan came only a day after it launched strikes inside Syria and Iraq‚ one of which was very close to the U.S. Consulate in Erbil‚ Iraq. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed that they were targeting the “headquarters of spies” and “anti-Iranian terrorist gatherings in parts of the region.” The IRGC claimed the facilities it targeted belonged to Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency. Iran claimed that Mossad was behind “terrorist activities in the region.”

The third-ranking House Republican‚ Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY)‚ condemned on Wednesday an endeavor to censure her by Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) in connection to the U.S. Capitol breach on January 6‚ 2021‚ and beyond. “Desperate corrupt Far Left House Democrats are attempting to force a vote to censure me for my unwavering support for the Constitution‚ the rule of law‚ and election integrity‚” Stefanik said in a post to X. Stefanik‚ the House Republican conference chairwoman‚ included a link to a fundraising page that claimed she was being retaliated against for her effectiveness in “exposing” the lies and corruption of President Joe Biden and the Democrats as well as her “unwavering support” of former President Donald Trump. 🚨🚨Desperate corrupt Far Left House Democrats are attempting to force a vote to censure me for my unwavering support for the Constitution‚ the rule of law‚ and election integrity. Democrats are in desperate free fall because they know President Trump will defeat Joe Biden this… — Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) January 17‚ 2024 Goldman‚ who served as lead counsel in the first Trump impeachment‚ has emerged as the Democrats’ most vocal defender of Biden and critic of GOP-led inquiries. His office argued in a statement announcing the censure resolution on Wednesday that Stefanik has engaged in “conduct unbecoming” of a member of Congress and Goldman took particular issue with her recently “echoing” Trump’s rhetoric when she referred to January 6 inmates as “hostages.” The resolution also lists a number of other grievances against Stefanik‚ including raising concerns about the 2020 election results and her criticisms of special counsel Jack Smith’s January 6 case against Trump‚ and calls for her to present herself to the well of House for the pronouncement of the censure. Throughout history‚ 27 members have been successfully censured‚ which is a formal rebuke and a less severe form of punishment than expulsion‚ though there has been an uptick of late. House members who were censured last year included Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA)‚ Rashida Tlaib (D-MI)‚ and Jamaal Bowman (D-NY). Still‚ the resolution against Stefanik faces long odds considering the GOP has a narrow hold on the House while more than 110 House Republicans — roughly half of their total number — back Trump in his latest White House campaign. Among those to defend Stefanik was House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA). “I just heard about Goldman’s censure resolution against Elise Stefanik. I think it’s patently absurd. She’s one of the best leaders and best communicators in Congress. She is doing an exceptional job and the idea that he would use censure to attack a political opponent is just ridiculous‚” Johnson said‚ per Punchbowl News.

Top pediatricians who promote gender ideology previously admitted that puberty blockers are not as reversible as many claim‚ newly surfaced videos show. The videos come from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s (WPATH) educational sessions held back in September 2022‚ according to the Daily Caller News Foundation‚ which obtained the clips. On Puberty Blockers being more invasive than portrayed in media: “Oh puberty blockers are just reversible and it’s a very noninvasive treatment‚’ I would say it’s more invasive than often times the media makes it out to be or other people.” pic.twitter.com/2yXXysSvzH — Meg Brock (@MegEBrock) January 16‚ 2024 On calcium deficiency: "The puberty blockers slow that calcium accrual back into the bones quite a bit‚ back to the prepubertal level." "This is a concern that not everybody is getting their piggy bank completely filled up with calcium.” pic.twitter.com/b8DBNHOet2 — Meg Brock (@MegEBrock) January 16‚ 2024 WPATH issues Standards of Care that are seen as the gold standard for transgender medical treatment. The Standards recommend that children be put on puberty blockers‚ cross-sex hormones‚ and receive gender surgery. The filmed educational sessions were part of an optional transgender medical certification program for WPATH-licensed clinicians. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP One doctor voiced concerns with how “reversible” puberty blockers really are — Dr. Scott Leibowitz‚ who is a WPATH board member and helped lead the development of the adolescent chapter of the WPATH Standards of Care. “I think when we just say‚ ‘Oh puberty blockers are just reversible and it’s a very noninvasive treatment‚’ I would say it’s more invasive than often times the media makes it out to be or other people‚” Leibowitz said. “There’s challenges with puberty suppression that we have to acknowledge and that’s why it’s ‘reversible asterisks‚’” Leibowitz said. “One cannot be on puberty suppression endlessly. You get to a place where physiologically‚ we need hormones.” Leibowitz added that evidence is only one consideration in treating trans-identifying people. Other concerns are “ethics” and “justice for trans people.” “We don’t rely on evidence for every single treatment we do in medicine‚” Leibowitz said. In another one of the educational sessions‚ Dr. Daniel Metzger‚ a WPATH-certified pediatric endocrinologist‚ describes how puberty blockers can prevent children from building up the calcium they need in their bones‚ potentially putting them at risk for osteoporosis. “Normally puberty is the time of putting the calcium into your piggy bank. This is how I explain it to families. You’ve got a piggy bank for your calcium and you better get it all in by 25 because at 25 you’re going to live off that piggy bank‚” Metzger said. He continued‚ “The puberty blockers slow that calcium accrual back into the bones quite a bit‚ back to the prepubertal level. We do know that even if you look at people now age 22‚ if you’ve done all of this and you’ve gone off and then you go back on the hormones that you want to have‚ you have not caught up by age 22. Which is about the time you need to fill up your piggy bank. This is a concern that not everybody is getting their piggy bank completely filled up with calcium.” Metzger also said more research is needed on how puberty blockers affect children’s brains. “Obviously teenagers‚ their brains are changing. They’re unwiring‚ they’re rewiring. And if we’ve started one kid unwiring and half rewiring‚ and then we changed their puberty the other way and we’re unwiring‚ people have been trying to figure out what this does for kids’ brains‚” said Metzger. “They seem to do reasonably the same as their friends‚ but we’re not looking at their IQ and their learning ability and lots of other things‚” the physician said. Metzger also said that for boys‚ puberty blockers can prevent enough genital tissue from growing and cause problems later when they want to get a vaginoplasty‚ but there is not enough tissue. The effects of puberty blockers on fertility also need more research‚ Metzger admitted. Puberty blockers stop boys from developing sperm‚ and for girls‚ it is unknown whether girls in early puberty would have eggs mature enough to preserve for fertility before they are put on puberty blockers. “Kids have zero idea about their fertility‚” he said. Both puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones come with serious health risks. Puberty blockers can affect bone growth and density and cause sexual dysfunction‚ voice damage‚ and infertility‚ among other issues. Cross-sex hormones can cause infertility‚ deadly blood clots‚ heart attacks‚ increased cancer risks of the breasts and ovaries‚ liver dysfunction‚ worsening psychological illness‚ and other serious conditions. Meanwhile‚ it is more popular than ever for youth to adopt new gender identities. An estimated 300‚000 minors aged 13 to 17 identified as transgender as of last year‚ and that number has only continued to grow.

A judge halted on Wednesday a top Maine official’s move to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 primary ballot. Superior Court Justice Michaela Murphy remanded the matter to Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows‚ but ordered a pause until a decision is made in a similar case from Colorado for a new ruling to be issued on Trump’s eligibility. The result “minimizes any potentially destabilizing effect of inconsistent decisions and will promote greater predictability in the weeks ahead of the primary election‚” the judge wrote. “The Court therefore concludes that its remand of this matter is in the public interest.” Bellows‚ a Democrat‚ removed Trump from her state’s ballot for the March 5 primary last month on the view that he violated the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause due to his conduct leading up to the U.S. Capitol breach on January 6‚ 2021. Trump responded by appealing the decision to the Maine Superior Court. His lawyers argued that Bellows was biased against their client and made a decision based on “untrustworthy evidence.” A flurry of 14th Amendment cases in other states have been dismissed in court or remain active. One particular lawsuit‚ in Colorado‚ led to the state’s supreme court last month to kick Trump off the primary ballot. The U.S. Supreme Court‚ on which there are three Trump nominees‚ agreed to review the Colorado decision. Oral arguments are scheduled to take place on February 8. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “I fought really hard to get three very‚ very good people‚ and they’re great people‚ very smart people‚ and I just hope that they’re going to be fair‚” Trump said at a recent event in Iowa‚ according to NBC News. Trump is running a third campaign for the White House while also facing a bevy of criminal cases‚ some of which are tied to January 6‚ as well as civil litigation. The former president has broadly denied any wrongdoing. Despite the legal hurdles‚ Trump leads in polls examining the Republican primary contest. On Monday‚ he emerged victorious from the Iowa caucuses over his GOP rivals‚ which include Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and former South Carolina Governor and U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley.

New York City is imposing a curfew on several migrant shelters after complaints from the nearby communities about the newcomers’ behavior‚ including panhandling. Starting Tuesday‚ Mayor Eric Adams imposed an 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew at four migrant shelters holding about 1‚900 people‚ just a small fraction of the tens of thousands of illegal migrants who have streamed into the city recently. For now‚ the curfew only affects four shelters — the JFK respite center‚ and one on 35th Street in Astoria‚ along with the Lincoln shelter on 110th Street in Manhattan and the Stockton Street shelter in Brooklyn. However‚ the mayor is reportedly considering expanding the curfew to up to 200 total shelters and respite centers. “Part of it is just sort of to help us better manage things at the site. Part of it is community feedback‚” New York City Emergency Management Commissioner Zach Iscol told CBS. Panhandling‚ shoplifting‚ knocking on doors asking for clothing‚ and violent episodes were some of the complaints from residents about the newly arrived migrants at the shelters. “My constituents are terrified‚” City Council member Joann Ariola told FOX 5 New York. “They have people that they don’t know at their doorbell. They usually have a child with them. They have their telephone‚ their iPhone and on it‚ it says‚ in English‚ ‘I’m a migrant from Floyd Bennett Field‚ please give me money.’ It’s very‚ very concerning because at times‚ they find them on their property.” Earlier this month‚ Adams admitted that some migrants are engaging in a “robbery pattern.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP About 161‚000 migrants‚ mostly from Venezuela‚ have flooded into New York City since the spring of 2022‚ and about half of them are still in the city’s care. The crisis has forced the city to open new shelters and slash the budget of every city agency‚ even including police‚ public schools‚ and sanitation. “This policy will allow for more efficient capacity management for migrants in the city’s care‚” a city spokesperson said in a statement. Adams predicted that the influx of migrants would ultimately cost the city as much as $12 billion. The new curfew rule comes as some migrant families were evicted this week under Adams’ new policy requiring migrants to reapply for shelter after 60 days‚ a rule meant to encourage those living in the city’s packed shelters to find new living arrangements. Some migrants said they planned to reapply for shelter‚ while others said they were meeting up with family members in other cities.

It’s easy to get the idea that the city of Boston has lost its creative spark. This is the place that once brought America a lot of firsts — the first public park‚ the first subway system‚ the first tea party‚ the first massacre and so on. Now whenever you hear Boston in the news‚ it’s usually pretty uninspiring stuff by comparison. You’re hearing about how the mayor is banning white people from holiday parties‚ or the fact that the president of Harvard has never had an original thought in her life‚ or the decision by Mass General to bring back mask mandates. Despite all that‚ it would be a mistake to say Boston has given up on innovation. They’re still doing groundbreaking stuff up there‚ at least if you ask them. For example‚ back in 2019‚ Suffolk County‚ Massachusetts — which includes the city of Boston — embarked on a first-of-its-kind‚ real-life social experiment. Under the leadership of their new district attorney‚ Rachel Rollins‚ Suffolk County decided to stop prosecuting criminals who were accused of most non-violent misdemeanors‚ including disorderly conduct and shoplifting. The cops would arrest the shoplifters‚ and then the prosecutors would just let them off the hook. This was a relatively new strategy for a major American city — remember‚ this was before the “racial reckoning” of 2020. The theory was these kinds of prosecutions did more harm than good‚ and that it’s better to refer these criminals to counseling sessions instead of throwing them in prison. A few years after that policy went into effect‚ leading researchers at major universities — including Rutgers‚ Texas A&;M‚ and NYU — published a lengthy paper declaring Boston’s strategy had been successful. They found that‚ “the recent policy change in Suffolk County imposing a presumption of non-prosecution for nonviolent misdemeanor offenses … [decreased] the likelihood of subsequent criminal justice involvement.” In other words‚ if you let criminals get away with shoplifting‚ they’re less likely to get in trouble with the law in the future. In Left-wing circles‚ this is known as “restorative justice‚” and officials in Boston said it was proof their idea had worked. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show What no one seemed to grasp at these universities‚ however‚ is that this is the exact result you should expect when you legalize shoplifting — and it’s not a good one. It’s not surprising that shoplifters don’t get in trouble with the law anymore if you stop prosecuting them for petty crimes. But that doesn’t mean they’ve stopped shoplifting and committing petty crimes. In fact‚ if anything‚ it means they’re shoplifting a lot more than they used to‚ because why wouldn’t they? They’re going to shoplift so much that it becomes impossible for businesses to stay open‚ which means that very quickly‚ so-called “disadvantaged communities” will lose access to convenience stores and pharmacies. They will become even more disadvantaged‚ which is supposedly the opposite of “restorative justice.” We don’t have to speculate about this. All we have to do is look at what’s happening right now in Boston. Walgreens has just announced it’s closing its fourth location in Boston in the past year. Every single time‚ it’s been a low-income community‚ mostly black or Hispanic‚ that’s been affected. This time‚ they’re closing a store in the mostly black neighborhood of Roxbury. You might think this development would prompt some reflection from the media in Boston‚ or the politicians‚ or activists in the local community. You might think they’d ask whether allowing people to rob stores is‚ in fact‚ a bad idea. But that’s not what’s happening. Instead‚ we’re getting reports like this one‚ from CBS Boston: Well‚ that last question is easy to answer: Walgreens‚ just like every other private business‚ has no obligation whatsoever to lose money. They don’t have to stay open to provide any kind of “service” to the local community. Their job is to make money. That’s not greed. That’s called economics. It’s the government’s job to make sure there is law and order‚ so that thugs don’t just walk into the Walgreens and take everything. And in the past several years‚ the government has deliberately decided not to do that. But there’s no sense anywhere in that entire segment that Boston’s policy of encouraging shoplifting might be to blame. You can go online and watch the whole clip if you want. It’s not there. There’s no sense that Boston’s recent decision to defund its police department could be playing a role‚ either. Instead‚ we’re left with the implication that Walgreens just doesn’t like black people. The argument appears to be that Walgreens should keep its business open as a charity‚ where it keeps bleeding money in order to provide various services to the local community. But if you do some digging‚ it’s not hard to conclude why Walgreens is shutting down this Roxbury location. Here’s footage taken by a citizen journalist in Boston a couple of years ago. He films as police finally arrest a woman they said shoplifted three separate times in one day. Watch this to get a sense of what it’s like at these Walgreens locations in the area: This is how common shoplifting became in Roxbury and the surrounding areas after Boston’s big push to legalize shoplifting. The cops don’t arrest the shoplifters anymore‚ for the most part. They released this woman several times before arresting her out of exasperation. And when they finally feel compelled to make an arrest‚ everyone knows it doesn’t really matter. The shoplifters know they won’t get prosecuted‚ so they keep coming back. That woman will be back robbing the store within a few hours. That’s why Walgreens is now shutting down all these stores in Boston. This is a massive problem‚ as the cops say in that video. According to one study‚ shoplifting in Boston is up roughly 40%since June of 2019‚ when the city’s experiment began. That’s in the city overall. In neighborhoods like Roxbury‚ the figures are presumably far higher. And it’s not just shoplifting that’s out of control. Recently the Boston Globe ran a story that was intended to portray Walgreens in a bad light‚ and make them seem like an evil greedy megacorp for closing their Roxbury location. But they included this information in their report. “[The] generational impact is felt by Roxbury residents like Lucille Culpepper-Jones. … She said she doesn’t see herself visiting the Columbus Avenue drugstore [a mile away]‚ because she doesn’t feel safe walking there alone.” So this is a neighborhood that’s so dangerous that elderly women don’t want to go outside. And yet we’re expected to believe that businesses should stay open in these kinds of neighborhoods‚ where their stores will get robbed and their employees will get attacked. That’s just an assumption CBS and the NAACP demand you make. So naturally they’re telling everyone to protest Walgreens‚ instead of the politicians that CBS and the NAACP support. Of course‚ protesting Walgreens’ decision to pull out of this neighborhood is a bit like protesting the laws of gravity. You can whine all you want‚ but basic economic principles still exist. Businesses exist to make a profit‚ and when they can’t make a profit‚ they have to close down. But the other day‚ the residents of Roxbury dutifully protested anyway. Watch: So CBS does some investigative reporting in that segment‚ by which I mean their reporter sat in the parking lot for a little while and noticed a “steady stream” of customers at the Walgreens. We’re apparently supposed to conclude from this that the store is doing great businesses‚ and has no reason to close. But the problem with shoplifting isn’t that no one goes into the store. It’s that too many people go into the store — specifically criminals — and then they don’t pay. But the reporter can’t explore that avenue whatsoever‚ because that would be racist. In fact‚ in their statement‚ Walgreens couldn’t really blame shoplifting either. They had to give some coded language about market dynamics. That’s a contrast to what we saw last year‚ when Target shut down nine stores‚ including its store on Folsom Street in San Francisco and one location in Harlem. In that instance‚ Target explicitly blamed‚ “theft and organized retail crime [which] are threatening the safety of our team and guests‚ and contributing to unsustainable business performance.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP After Target made that decision‚ various Left-wing publications‚ including CNBC‚ attacked Target. They rushed to point out that Target was closing stories with relatively low reports of shoplifting‚ compared to stores Target was leaving open. And from this data point‚ we were supposed to conclude that Target was racist. Of course the whole argument was absurd. One of the problems with this analysis is that stores where shoplifting is common often don’t report it. That led to a comical moment in 2021‚ when a single Target store decided to start reporting shoplifting incidents‚ which doubled the entire city’s shoplifting rate in the month of September. None of this is compatible with social justice narratives‚ so you never hear about it. Now stores like Walgreens have learned to just avoid mentioning organized theft entirely. But that hasn’t appeased these activists. They still want you to conclude that there’s a vast racist conspiracy among various pharmacies to pull out of black communities‚ just to spite them. You’re supposed to believe that this is why‚ in just the past two years‚ between Walgreens‚ Rite Aid‚ and CVS‚ more than 1‚500 stores have closed.  It’s completely insane‚ but it’s not just activists in Boston who are pushing this narrative. We’re seeing this denial of reality everywhere‚ including San Francisco. And once again‚ the NAACP is involved. Watch: Black community leaders are outraged over the impending closure of a 40-year-old inner-city Safeway in San Francisco. The closure comes despite the increased security measures at the store. pic.twitter.com/EPi5Ziqjll — TENET Media (@watchTENETnow) January 11‚ 2024 So they’re going to get rid of the business and replace it with housing‚ probably because housing is a little tougher to steal. But once again‚ in that news report‚ there’s not even a suggestion that San Francisco’s policies might be to blame. And that’s odd‚ given that San Francisco’s policies mirror Boston’s. According to NBC San Francisco‚‚ “Under current state law‚ shoplifting merchandise valued under $950 is considered a misdemeanor and often not investigated.” Could that be the issue‚ perhaps? Let’s see. Chicago is another city that stopped prosecuting shoplifters unless they steal more than $1‚000 worth of goods. And even then‚ cops aren’t allowed to chase them. How are things going there? Last year‚ the mayor at the time‚ Lori Lightfoot‚ had to respond to Walmart’s decision to pull out of the South Side. You’ll never guess what she said. Watch: It’s amazing how unified the messaging has been on this issue‚ going back years. This is nothing new. And still‚ there’s no self-reflection at all. There’s no accountability for the people who have actually made these communities into dead zones for businesses. The next time you hear complaints about “food deserts” or “pharmacy deserts‚” keep in mind this is what’s causing the problem. It’s a systemic issue plaguing every city that has implemented the bold experiment Boston launched back in 2019. Now one of two outcomes is possible: Either this experiment can finally end‚ we can enforce the law‚ and people living in these black communities can get their prescriptions and their groceries. Or these residents can continue voting for politicians who will only make the problem progressively worse‚ until elderly women are quite literally dying in the streets because they can’t get their medication. It’s clear that’s what the NAACP and corporate press want. And unless these communities start taking some responsibility‚ that’s exactly what they’ll get.

Newsom for Prez

'Abused loopholes'

'Is he lying then?'