This Pokémon-inspired open-world game lets you farm crops‚ craft items‚ and collect adorable Pals. But is Palworld co-op multiplayer‚ and how does it work? Before you get ahead of yourself‚ there’s a lot you need to know about the single-player and multiplayer aspects of Palworld. Palworld: How does the co-op multiplayer work? Luckily‚ there is a co-op multiplayer mode in Palworld‚ but let me explain further how this works. It’s not just your typical 4-player game‚ except for the fact that it’s certainly a feature. In a private server‚ up to four players can explore dungeons‚ catch and breed Pals‚ and even create factories. Screenshot: Pocketpair Of course‚ you’re free to play on your own. But did you know that you can create a dedicated server that allows up to 32 players? That’s a pretty huge number‚ and you may not ever reach it. But it’s neat to see that up to 32 people can live in one Palworld server to...

There are tons of companions you can romance in this game‚ but there are also others that aren’t‚ but should be. For that reason‚ we’ve created a list of 10 Baldur’s Gate 3 characters that should’ve been romanceable. While I understand that not every NPC could get the chance of having a romantic storyline‚ there are so many possibilities in an alternate universe that would be incredible. And no‚ I’m not choosing Isobel or Dame Aylin‚ they’re in a very happy relationship with each other that I refuse to break. Baldur’s Gate 3: 10 characters that should be romanceable Screenshot: PC Invasion Dammon Dammon is a truly underrated character in BG3. This Tiefling serves as a blacksmith and helps Karlach tame her Infernal Engine. He never really asks for payment for the work he does with Karlach‚ he helps because he’s a good friend. I really found Dammon to be a wonderful character that I wished to get...

The Peacekeepers is an Exotic Leg Armor piece for Titans that players can earn in Destiny 2. It’s a useful piece of gear that reloads stowed Submachine Guns and massively improves your handling with them. Here’s you can get them for yourself in Destiny 2. Where to find the Peacekeepers in Destiny 2 The Peacekeepers can be found within any Exotic Engram earned through Ritual Activities in Destiny 2. So by completing Vanguard Strikes‚ Crucible Matches‚ or sets of Gambit‚ there’s a chance you’ll gain the Peacekeepers as a reward. This is of course dependent on you playing as a Titan when unlocking the Engram. Screenshot: PC Invasion It can also appear as an item sold by Xur when he appears on weekends but due to the huge pool of available items‚ this is a rarity. It’s worth watching for what he has in stock anyway though. And once you’ve unlocked the Peacekeepers in Destiny 2‚ you can reroll them again via Red War L...

The budget deal reached this past weekend between Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress fails to include real spending cuts or to secure the border‚ warns Ryan Walker‚ the executive vice president of Heritage Action for America.  “The American people are begging Congress to secure the border and rein in the unprecedented government spending and woke policies that are making it impossible for them to afford basics‚ like groceries and gas‚” Walker said in a statement Tuesday.  “As reported‚ the spending framework does neither. Conservative lawmakers should not support appropriations bills that perpetuate [President Joe] Biden’s destructive economic agenda while funding the ongoing invasion at our borders‚” he added. Heritage Action is the policy advocacy arm of The Heritage Foundation‚ of which The Daily Signal is the news outlet.     Walker commended House Speaker Mike Johnson‚ R-La.‚ for small victories in the spending agreement in scaling back money for the Internal Revenue Service and pulling back spending on COVID-19.  The deal for fiscal year 2024 keeps discretionary spending at $1.59 trillion‚ about the same as in the deal reached last May by then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy‚ R-Calif.‚ and the Biden administration. Democrats gave up their push to spend $10 billion more on the IRS and $6.1 billion on COVID-19.  Walker said the top-line spending numbers in the deal are still too high for fiscal year 2024.  “While negotiating FY24 spending‚ any bill that addresses or funds the border or immigration policy—like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appropriations bill—should include HR 2 in its entirety‚” he said.  House Resolution 2 is the Secure the Border Act‚ which the GOP-controlled Congress passed in May‚ at a time‚ Republicans say‚ the Department of Homeland Security is failing in its border protection responsibilities. The House majority is weighing a possible impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in connection with the border crisis.  “Lawmakers should not provide additional funding to the Biden DHS while allowing Secretary Mayorkas to continue encouraging asylum fraud‚ granting mass immigration parole and work authorization‚ employing catch-and-release‚ paying [nongovernmental organizations] to transport illegal aliens throughout the country‚ or enticing unaccompanied alien children (UACs) to come to the border by allowing them to stay in the U.S.‚” Walker added. Sen. James Lankford‚ R-Okla.‚ is the Republican point man for negotiating a border deal with the Biden administration. But the negotiations are hardly relevant‚ he contends.  “Finally‚ the House should move forward with securing our border‚ regardless of the Lankford-Mayorkas deal that’s percolating in the Senate‚” Walker said‚ adding: We know that deal will ultimately be tied to the White House’s supplemental-funding package‚ which sticks taxpayers with another $110.5 billion in reckless spending‚ most of which will be shipped overseas. Worse‚ the measure will be a ‘compromise’ on border security‚ negotiated by the very Cabinet secretary set to be impeached for actions and inactions on these very issues—Secretary Mayorkas. It’s time lawmakers stop pretending this bill is relevant to the conversation ahead of us and reject it outright. Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com‚ and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post ‘Spending Framework’ Fails to Secure Border or Cut Spending‚ Heritage Action Warns appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Former President Donald Trump’s claim to presidential immunity from prosecution came under intense questioning Tuesday by a three-judge federal panel. Surrounded by high amounts of security and media due to the former president’s attendance‚ the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard arguments Tuesday to consider Trump’s appeal of U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan decision not to dismiss his election-interference case based on presidential immunity. The panel included Judges Karen Henderson‚ a George H.W. Bush appointee‚ and Michelle Childs and Florence Pan‚ Biden appointees. “Could a president order SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival?” Pan asked Trump’s attorney‚ Dean John Sauer. Sauer argued that there is “a political process that would have to occur” under the structure of the Constitution‚ which requires impeachment and conviction by the Senate prior to criminal prosecution. Department of Justice lawyer James Pearce contended that would lead to an “extraordinarily frightening future‚” where a president can simply resign before he is impeached and evade responsibility for a crime. “Never in our nation’s history has a president claimed that immunity extends beyond his time in office‚” Pearce argued. “The president has a unique constitutional role‚” he said. “But he is not above the law.” Sauer said authorizing prosecution of a president for official acts would open a “Pandora’s box.” For example‚ it could lead to “shocking results‚” like indicting President Joe Biden after he leaves office for “mismanaging the border.” Pan said Sauer’s concession that a president could be prosecuted if first impeached and convicted by the Senate seemed to mean his other arguments for immunity “fall away.” She pressed Sauer to answer whether Trump could have been “properly prosecuted” if he had been impeached on the same or related conduct as is contained in the indictment. “The issue that falls to us is your interpretation of the impeachment judgment clause‚” Pan said. “That’s all we need to decide.” Pan noted there is also an executive interest in “enforcing criminal laws.” “I think it is paradoxical to say that his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed allows him to violate criminal laws‚” Henderson said. Childs and Pan both expressed hesitancy at some points to reach an answer on the immunity question at all‚ pointing to arguments raised in an amicus brief filed by American Oversight that the appeal is premature and that the court lacks jurisdiction. Pearce urged the court to reach a conclusion “even if it entertains doubts.” “At least since the Watergate-era 50 years ago‚ there has been widespread societal recognition by presidents and the executive branch that a former president is subject to criminal prosecution‚” Pearce argued. The Supreme Court shot down in December special counsel Jack Smith’s bid to fast-track the appeal and bypass review at the D.C. Circuit. Once the panel issues a ruling‚ the issue could be back before the justices if Trump chooses to appeal. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com‚ and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post Appeals Court Pushes Back on Trump’s Presidential Immunity Claim appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The social media platform X‚ previously known as Twitter‚ abruptly suspended the accounts of numerous journalists and mostly left-leaning commentators without providing a clear rationale. Some of the affected individuals include Steven Monacelli of Texas Observer‚ Ken Klippenstein from The Intercept‚ podcaster Rob Rousseau‚ Alan MacLeod from MintPress News‚ and @zei_squirrel. Visitors to their profiles are met with a suspension notice‚ yet the reason for this action remains unspecified‚ with a generic message stating that “X suspends accounts which violate the X rules.” This action by X lacks a comprehensive explanation. The accounts linked to the platform’s terms of service‚ which encompass a broad spectrum of potential infringements. Former British politician and now political commentator George Galloway brought the suspensions to the attention of Elon Musk who said he would “investigate” the issue. The banned accounts were all soon reinstated but still with no clear reason why they were banned in the first place. All of the banned accounts have been leveling criticism against the Israeli government. Responding to the incident‚ X owner Elon Musk wrote‚ “There are around 600 million active accounts on this platform. Mistakes are bound to be made at such a scale‚ but we try to fix them quickly. “There will always be some false positives and false negatives‚ but we aspire to take corrective action rapidly. The post X Temporarily Suspended Several Accounts Critical of Israel appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The social media platform X has announced a new partnership with several notable names‚ including former CNN anchor Don Lemon‚ Tulsi Gabbard‚ the renowned Army Reserve officer‚ veteran‚ four-term congresswoman‚ and 2020 presidential candidate‚ and sports talk show host Jim Rome. According to the platform‚ this collaboration marks a significant step in the platform’s commitment to promoting diverse voices and perspectives. X’s official statement highlights the essence of this partnership with Gabbard: “We’re excited to announce a new partnership with Tulsi Gabbard! She will be sharing her unique [point of view] through an exclusive series of documentary-style videos and broader content on X.” And of Don Lemon: “We’re delighted to announce a new content partnership with @DonLemon for his new project‚ The Don Lemon Show. The award winning TV journalist will share his unique and honest voice in 30 minute episodes‚ three times a week‚ covering politics‚ culture‚ sports and entertainment.” And of Jim Rome: “Renowned sports commentator @JimRome will be bringing his wildly popular content to digital video‚ for the first time ever. The show will stream exclusively on X‚ five days a week‚ starting after the Super Bowl.” Tulsi Gabbard‚ known for her outspoken stance on free speech and her political career‚ expressed her enthusiasm for this new venture. In her statement‚ she emphasized the importance of free speech‚ especially in the current social climate where debate and dissent are often suppressed. “Freedom of speech is a fundamental right in America‚” Gabbard said. “Sadly‚ we live in a time where debate‚ dialogue‚ and dissent can be cause for cancellation and censorship by those in power.” Don Lemon said that he was pleased to join X‚ due to the lack of “hall monitors.” Lemon “parted ways” with CNN after being reprimanded after saying presidential candidate Nikki Haley was not “in her prime” – saying for that to be the case she would have to be “in her 20s‚ 30s and maybe her 40s.” When asked if he meant “prime for childbearing or…prime for being president‚” Lemon said: “Don’t shoot the messenger‚ I’m just saying what the facts are.” In a statement‚ Lemon said “…you’ll find it first on X‚ the biggest space for free speech in the world. I know now more than ever that we need a place for honest debate and discussion without the hall monitors. This is just the beginning so stay tuned.” Gabbard will focus on a series of short films that promise to shed light on the truth of what’s happening in America and the world – stories that‚ according to her‚ are often overlooked by those in power. Under the leadership of Elon Musk‚ X has been positioning itself as a bastion of free expression‚ which is significantly more free than under previous ownership‚ though this has been sometimes rocky. The post X Announces Exclusive Deals With Tulsi Gabbard‚ Don Lemon‚ Jim Rome appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The American Psychological Association (APA) is among those organizations enlisted to join the “war on misinformation” back in 2021‚ when APA took a $2 million grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to help push the Covid narratives of the time. APA’s particular task there was to come up with “a scientific consensus statement on the science of misinformation.” Now‚ APA is clamoring for even more federal money as it declares psychology to be “leading the way on fighting misinformation” and advertises psychologists as the right people to research the problem (as it has been presented over the last years)‚ and also be “part of the solution.” An article on APA’s site doesn’t shy away from using terminology that spreads a sense of alarm‚ such as “the scourge of misinformation” and asserting that clinicians now have to treat patients “subsumed” by conspiracy theories‚ while institutions and communities are all allegedly suffering unspecified “harm.” And APA also doesn’t shy away from mentioning the US presidential election‚ or from positioning that event as something that makes combating misinformation “messier and more important than ever.” Messy it is‚ alright. To position itself properly among all those vying for funding/influence by exaggerating the threat posed by misinformation as a new phenomenon‚ APA actually states that‚ with the election in mind‚ fighting misinformation is “one of the top trends facing the field (physiology) in 2024.” Really‚ APA? Maybe the author meant – a top trend faced by the organization itself‚ since it has had to show something in return for the $2 million 2021 CDC grant given to it to research “the science of stopping misinformation.” (Spoiler: that “science” is already well-developed and applied; it’s called censorship.) Beside the general alarmist tone‚ APA also came up with “recommendations.” First‚ shut up – “don’t repeat misinformation.” Next‚ leverage “trusted sources to share accurate information.” At this point APA is pretty much parroting Big Tech’s various “guidelines” that have justified a lot of legitimate information getting obliterated over the past years as (never precisely and objectively defined) “misinformation.” The “recommendations” address fellow physiologists‚ urging them to become “literate” in this newly crafted “science” – in order to be able to take active part in “the solution.” According to APA’s current standards‚ helping people (as psychology professionals) should now include the total of eight recommendations (prominent and fairly ominous‚ free speech-wise‚ among which is – “collaborate with social media companies to understand and reduce the spread of harmful misinformation”). And practitioners should do this everywhere – “(in) our labs‚ our communities‚ or our families.” The post The American Psychological Association Wants (More) Federal Funding To Curb Online “Misinformation” appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Highlighting the tension between free speech and over-sensitivity in workplace discussions‚ a Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) employee in the UK faced disciplinary action for expressing views during an online event about transgender issues. The event‚ held on March 11‚ 2021‚ was an International Women’s Day discussion titled “What trans is and some of the issues faced‚” featuring a transgender woman civil servant. Participants were encouraged to ask questions via an online chat. According to an initial report by The Telegraph‚ the controversy began when the civil servant‚ a lesbian woman‚ questioned the concept of trans women identifying as lesbians‚ expressing confusion over the alignment of sexual and gender identity. Further‚ she expressed discomfort with the controversial term “cis” and raised concerns about the inclusion of trans women in women’s sports‚ questioning the underlying assumptions about gender. “Cis” is a term that the transgender community use to refer to non-transgenders. The report states her remarks included‚ “One of the things I struggle to understand as a lesbian myself is‚ how can trans women be lesbian as lesbian is same sex attracted‚ not gender?” – “I find the term cis very offensive‚” “Sport is segregated because there is a difference‚” and “What if you don’t believe in gender? I don’t.” In the same discussion‚ the employee made a statement advocating for the consideration of diverse perspectives: “I think it’s useful to hear both sides of a subject.” However‚ a DWP investigator found this remark “inappropriate‚” stating the event was not intended as a debate platform. The investigation concluded with the employee receiving an official warning for violating the department’s behavior policy and harassment rules. Particularly‚ the use of the phrase “drink the kool aid” in response to arguments supporting trans women in women’s sports was deemed offensive‚ due to its origin in a tragic mass suicide event. Additionally‚ the employee’s insistence on centering International Women’s Day around biological women and her reaction to being called a “Terf [Trans exclusionary radical feminists]” in all caps‚ were found inappropriate. The DWP declined to comment on the specific case. The post UK Civil Servant Warned for Remarks on Trans Debate in Online Meeting appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Sign Up To Keep Reading This post is for Reclaim The Net supporters. Gain access to the entire archive of features and supporters-only content. Help protect free speech‚ freedom from surveillance‚ and digital civil liberties. Join Already a supporter? Login here The post The TVs That Watch You Back: Unveiling the Growing Surveillance Risks Lurking in Your Smart TV appeared first on Reclaim The Net.