In a bizarre act of frustration‚ a woman threw food at a Chipotle worker. But just wait until you hear the punishment the judge came up with for her! The sentiment‚ ‘Never judge a person until you've walked a mile in their shoes‚' has taken on a whole new meaning to 39-year-old mother of four Rosemary Hayne. Customer Throws Food On Chipotle Worker Rosemary lost her cool the day she ordered a burrito bowl at Chipotle. Instead of taking the poorly made burrito bowl in stride‚ she threw the steaming bowl of food in the face of a Chipotle employee. Rosemary was charged with a misdemeanor assault charge. Her case went before Judge Gilligan‚ who opted for wisdom mixed with a lesson of empathy instead of punishment. RELATED: Angry Customer Flings Drink At Pregnant Fast Food Worker But Good Samaritan Makes It Right Instead of a conventional jail term‚ Judge Gilligan presented Rosemary with a choice: either spend 90 days behind bars or opt for 30 days in jail coupled with 60 days of mandatory service as a fast food worker. The latter option would allow Rosemary to experience firsthand the challenges faced by the Chipotle worker she had wronged. In a Seinfeld-esque turn of events‚ the judge asked Rosemary‚ “Do you want to walk in her shoes for two months and learn how people should treat people‚ or do you want to do your jail time?” To everyone’s surprise‚ Rosemary replied‚ "I'd like to walk in her shoes." Rosemary chose to don the uniform and work in a fast-food establishment instead of wasting 30 days of her life behind bars. Judge Gilligan‚ in a display of creativity within the bounds of the legal system‚ believes that the fast food experience will offer valuable lessons‚ both in humility and empathy. A Lesson In Humility Sometimes‚ the road to redemption takes unexpected turns‚ guided by a divine hand seeking to impart valuable life lessons through people like Judge Gilligan‚ where we are indeed taught to walk a mile in another person's shoes. May this be a reminder to treat fast food service workers with dignity and respect. Judge Gilligan has shown that when it comes to delivering punishment‚ he’s no small fry. By making Rosemary Hayne trade her hot-headedness for a hot grill‚ he’s taken legal proceedings to a whole new level-a fast-food level‚ to be precise. This unconventional twist proves that in the court of culinary karma‚ sometimes you have to roll with the burrito bowls life serves you. YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Judge's Unconventional Punishment For Animal Cruelty Let’s hope Rosemary learns to wrap up her temper‚ appreciates the true art of fast food‚ and‚ most importantly‚ discovers that throwing a tantrum is just as unappetizing as a poorly prepared burrito. In this case‚ justice isn’t just blind; it’s got a taste for irony and a side of guacamole. May this unique sentence be a lesson to all-when life hands you a poorly made burrito bowl‚ bless the hands that prepared it. "Who is wise and understanding among you? Let them show it by their good life‚ by deeds done in the humility that comes from wisdom‚" James 3:13. WATCH: Woman Who Threw Food At Chipotle Worker Must Work In Fast Food  LISTEN: Baby Born at 1lb Goes Home After Nearly 500 Days | When Disaster Strikes‚ FEMA Calls Waffle House h/t: Good News Network Featured Image Credit: Youtube/WGN News The post Judge Has Clever Punishment for Woman Who Lost It and Threw Food at a Chipotle Worker appeared first on GodUpdates.

We’ve heard a lot about “Insurrection” over the last 3 years… Way more than I ever care to hear for the rest of my life. A made up and fake “scandal” designed to divert your attention from the truth. Basically‚ this meme: But while we’ve heard copious amounts of talk about “acts of insurrection” we haven’t heard much about the “Insurrection Act”. Two very different things. I’m going to explain the “Insurrection Act” to you in just a moment‚ but first let me show you this very angry‚ panicked video from a recent Biden speech. If you ask me‚ they know what’s coming and they are terrified: Biden says that “Trump plans to invoke the Insurrection Act which will allow him to deploy US military forces on the streets of America.” This panic-ridden speech is absolutely hilarious. It’s so cartoonish that they are either scared to death of what’s to come or they are… pic.twitter.com/0JrxtkjIo7 — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) January 5‚ 2024 Biden says that “Trump plans to invoke the Insurrection Act which will allow him to deploy US military forces on the streets of America.” This panic-ridden speech is absolutely hilarious. It’s so cartoonish that they are either scared to death of what’s to come or they are purposely sabotaging themselves. Cartoonish is absolutely right. Just look at how his face contorts with anger and evil‚ that’s some wild stuff! But back to the topic at hand‚ why is Joe Biden so panicked about President Trump using the Insurrection Act? Let me explain…. Trump May Deploy “Ironic” 1795 Law To Clean Up America Occam’s Razor says that the simplest answer is usually correct. Elon Musk often jokes that the most “ironic” outcome is usually the most likely to occur. And he might just be right on this one. What is the one word the Crooked Media and Crooked Congress has tried to sink President Trump with since January 2021? “Insurrection” In that context‚ people afraid that President Trump will win again (big league) in 2024‚ have tried to use the “Insurrection Clause” of the 14th Amendment to bar him from the ballot: Prohibition Against Holding Office: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states that no person shall hold any office‚ civil or military‚ under the United States or under any state‚ who‚ having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress‚ or as an officer of the United States‚ or as a member of any state legislature‚ or as an executive or judicial officer of any state‚ to support the Constitution of the United States‚ shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same‚ or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Of course we know that’s completely bogus‚ but did you know there is actually a different law on the books from 1795 called The Insurrection Act? Totally different thing‚ and the irony above all ironies is that President Trump may deploy it on Day 1 of his Presidency to clean up America: The Insurrection Act of 1795 is a United States federal law that empowers the President to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in specific circumstances‚ such as to suppress civil disorder‚ insurrection‚ and rebellion. The key aspects of this act include: Authorization for Use: The Act allows the President to use the armed forces to address an insurrection in any state which requests it‚ or in situations where it’s necessary to enforce federal law. Conditions for Deployment: Before deploying troops‚ the President must first issue a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse within a limited time. If the situation does not resolve after this proclamation‚ the President can then use military force. Historical Context: Enacted in 1795‚ the law was a response to the Whiskey Rebellion‚ a 1794 uprising against federal tax collections in western Pennsylvania. Subsequent Amendments: The Act has been amended several times‚ most notably by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878‚ which limits the use of military personnel under federal command for law enforcement purposes within the United States. Modern Usage: The Insurrection Act has been invoked on several occasions throughout history‚ including during the Los Angeles riots in 1992 and in response to Hurricane Hugo in 1989. America has become a third world country. Our major cities are not even safe to walk in any more. Have you seen this from Chicago? Chicago has fallen. Third worldShithole! pic.twitter.com/Z2WoZybUVa — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) September 17‚ 2023 Or this filth from New York? Breaking News: Democrats Piss Themselves on Trains Now… pic.twitter.com/oBdPGn6RF7 — Rob/1865 (@Rob1865_) November 28‚ 2023 Or this TERRIFYING attack on a woman in Chicago? THIS IS THIRD WORLD COUNTRY SHIT! Lock these thugs up or just execute them if needed….YES or NO? https://t.co/tAUZsRlQsA — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) November 28‚ 2023 Time to clean it up‚ and President Trump is just the man to do it. Here is The Associated Press: “You look at these great cities Los Angeles‚ San Francisco you look at what’s happening to our country… We cannot let it happen any longer. And one of the other things I’ll do.. Because you know you’re supposed to not be involved in that you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in… The next time‚ I’m not waiting. One of the things I did was let them run it‚ and we’re going to show how bad a job they do‚” he added. You can see the clip in this speech at the 1:50:00 mark — the play button should cue it up right to that spot: Here’s more from the Associated Press on how it may play out: The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states‚ an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails merely requires the president to request that the participants disperse. “The principal constraint on the president’s use of the Insurrection Act is basically political‚ that presidents don’t want to be the guy who sent tanks rolling down Main Street‚” said Joseph Nunn‚ a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice. “There’s not much really in the law to stay the president’s hand.” A spokesman for Trump’s campaign did not respond to multiple requests for comment about what authority Trump might use to pursue his plans. Congress passed the act in 1792‚ just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Nunn said it’s an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s‚ a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement. “It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn’t exist anymore‚” he said. It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act‚ which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes. Trump has spoken openly about his plans should he win the presidency‚ including using the military at the border and in cities struggling with violent crime. His plans also have included using the military against foreign drug cartels‚ a view echoed by other Republican primary candidates such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley‚ the former U.N. ambassador and South Carolina governor. What do you think? Here’s something else that’s very interesting…. Apparently‚ AI was asked what would have happened if President Trump had used the Insurrection Act back in January of 2020 before he left office…. The answer? It would have destroyed the country. In other words‚ this is EXACTLY why we had to have the 3-year “Pause”. President Trump Once Again Explains “The Pause” — This Time In More Detail WOW: AI Confirmed The Insurrection Act Would Have Destroyed The Country This is really interesting... Yes‚ this is from the Charlie Ward show‚ but let me explain. I've been fairly public over the years of saying I'm not a big fan of Charlie Ward and I'm a much lesser fan of Simon Parkes. But I do really like Juan O'Savin (which I'm sure is not his real name). I do believe Juan is not just a casual observer‚ I believe he's probably someone very connected‚ which I assume from the way he speaks. Just my two cents. I also really appreciate his Biblical world view. Even in this interview he tells people to not "follow a guru" but to get a direct connection to "Our Father in Heaven". And he's made many comments in the past that lead me to believe that's a Biblical‚ Christian view of God and not what these evil Elites think of their "gods". But anyway‚ back to the interview. Juan was on with Charlie Ward and Simon Parkes and while I d0n't put too much stock in what they say‚ I did find the interview fascinating. And most of it was Juan speaking. This is an entirely new interview‚ so even if you've heard some of his recent interviews there is a lot new in here. Perhaps the most interesting part to me was his discussion of The Insurrection Act and whether or not Trump signed it. Juan says absolutely not. And for the record‚ President Trump has also said absolutely not. Although it was considered. According to Juan‚ President Trump was extremely close to signing it but then decided not to after Artificial Intelligence computer modeling ran all the scenarios and determined it would send our country into a new Civil War (65% vs. 35%) -- one we likely would never have recovered from. There's a lot more in here too‚ including a full breakdown of the Brunson Supreme Court case and why it's likely to succeed. FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING. The whole interview is great (just take Charlie and Simon with a grain of salt‚ although they do say we're going to have a very good Christmas‚ so that is encouraging if true). Please enjoy this one... Watch here on Rumble: And speaking of the SCOTUS case‚ we could use your help! Brunson vs. Adams‚ Here's What Can You Do To Help! Calling all patriots! Since early November‚ I've been telling you about the Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case‚ Brunson v. Adams. I've been telling you it's special. I've been telling you it's unlike all the rest. And now I'm calling for your help... Thanks to WomenImpactingNation and PrayingMantis‚ I've got a great Q&;A for you to answer some of the top questions... ...as well as a call to action that everyone can help with! I know the deadline says December 15‚ but if you take action today it may still make a big difference. So please jump in. From WIN (originally sourced from PrayingMantis)‚ please read the following: This post is about the very important Brunson vs. Alma S. Adams‚ et al. case that is now before the U.S. Supreme Court.  Please read to the end! THE INFORMATION BELOW HAS BEEN REPRINTED IN PART WITH PERMISSION FROM PRAYING MANTIS at SUBSTACK.  Links to the full‚ original posts are at the end of this article‚ with instructions and links to the letter you are being asked to write and mail ASAP!  It must be mailed BEFORE DECEMBER 15!   If you attended the W.I.N. Christmas party‚ you heard a little intro to what’s going on.  Perhaps you have read a newsletter or an online media report about how critical this case is to our freedom. You need to know what is at stake and the “Hail Mary” action that we the people must take to save our United States of America republic. Please read this post in its entirety to get a better understanding of what the case is about and how it impacts every American. This is not about party or politics – each person has the right to their own opinions and affiliations. However‚ we can’t have a functioning society or country unless our voting system is trustworthy. Since 2020‚ many have investigated and proven electoral malfeasance. Now‚ after the 2022 midterms‚ most have realized that our electoral system is untrustworthy.  Without election integrity‚ we are no longer a free nation. Brunson v. Adams would seem to be a rather obscure case originating in Utah that seeks redress for the violation of Mr. Brunson’s constitutional rights to participate in a fair and honest election. After the overwhelming irregularities observed in the 2020 Presidential election‚ ordinary citizens questioned the validity of those results. So did some intelligence agencies. In fact‚ there was palpable concern that foreign entities colluded with domestic actors to subvert the election‚ affect the outcome‚ and perform maneuvers favoring of a candidate aligned with their interests.  Some congressmen and a few senators raised valid arguments regarding electoral malfeasance. United States law provides a 10-day pause for Congress to review election-related data when such circumstances arise. This examination should have been conducted prior to certifying the electors that placed Biden into office.  Instead‚ Congress rushed to install what is arguably a Manchurian candidate into the Presidency of the United States. 291 Representatives failed to perform the legal requirement of reviewing prior to certifying. They intentionally refused to investigate the evidence and conspired to cover it up. By allowing fraudulent votes to be counted‚ they knowingly mocked their oath to support and protect the U.S. Constitution against all enemies‚ foreign and domestic. Brunson v. Adams focuses not on the outcome of the Presidential election‚ but on the representatives’ failure to fulfill their legal duties. The defendants should have rejected the electoral college votes from those states with untrustworthy‚ unreliable‚ and unworthy electoral systems. Instead‚ they committed what technically amounts to an act of war and treason. Should Brunson v. Adams succeed‚ the implications are staggering and life-altering. 291 Representatives‚ 94 US Senators‚ President Biden‚ V.P. Harris‚ and former V.P. Pence are defendants who could be removed from office and/or tried for high crimes for their participation in this illegal operation. We MUST convey to the Supreme Court our support of case 22-380. We feel our nation has been captured by corruption at the highest levels and are concerned that our country has experienced a national security breach. Our greatest right as citizens has been violated because our vote has been compromised and devalued. We are asking the Justices to grant Brunson’s petition.  So we are IMMEDIATELY writing letters to the Supreme Court of the United States – and are asking you to do the same. Imagine if SCOTUS received one million letters from ordinary Americans.  How about if 10 million students‚ grandmas‚ aunts‚ moms and dads sent them a note of encouragement? If America falls‚ so does the rest of the world. How about letters from Australia‚ Canada‚ Italy‚ Brazil … China? We must speak up now! While SCOTUS can choose to hear this case at any time‚ interestingly enough‚ it is scheduled to be in conference on January 6‚ 2023. Therefore‚ it is critical the justices receive a wave of our letters before they break for Christmas – so we must act TODAY.  Tell your friends and family and coworkers.  Have them tell theirs and those folks tell theirs!  Share this post.  Copy-and-paste it into an email.  Forward the W.I.N. newsletter.  Get this out to every single person you know. Here is how (please read all of the instructions): 1) Mail a letter to SCOTUS. The text is provided in the link but please make sure you add a P.S. Handwritten is best since personalization is extremely meaningful. Have your kids and grandkids send a letter as well. Ask them to draw a picture or decorate with stickers! CLICK HERE to go directly to the document which you can print‚ edit‚ personalize and mail. 2) Copy your letter. 3) MAIL the original to the Supreme Court and MAIL a copy to the Brunson Brothers. This is critical so the Brunson legal team can validate the amount of letters the Supreme Court is receiving. Supreme Court Address: Supreme Court of the United States Attn: Chief Justice John Roberts‚ Jr. and All Associate Justices 1 First Street N.E. Washington‚ DC 20543. Brunson Address: Loy &; Raland Brunson 4287 South Harris Blvd. Apt. 132 Ogden‚ Utah 84403 4) Consider donating to the Brunsons to help pay for the legal costs of this litigation – CLICK HERE. 5) Send these instructions to your friends and family. Have letter-writing parties or host a zoom call to write letters together. Be creative‚ action-oriented‚ and effective! Reach out overseas: America may be the last light out unless we all come together. 6) Time is of essence. Please mail NOW. CLICK TO VIEW/DOWNLOAD SCOTUS 22-380 SAMPLE LETTER in PDF format To read the original posts with greater detail‚ go to: https://prayingmantis.substack.com/p/scotus-save-us Here is the link to the letter itself: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vpq-CWbB7mAihrYbmFNVM0FDfIKKWWkg2Nt8HQSZ2oA/edit# Here is a link to a site with a chronology of the lawsuit: https://www.newstreason.com/post/supreme-court-brunson-v-alma-s-adams-et-al-case-summary-and-timeline DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH – THIS CASE IS ALL OVER THE INTERNET. BUT GET THOSE LETTERS WRITTEN TODAY! This thing is really heating up... When I very first reported on it‚ people didn't even think it could be real. Now? Now EVERYONE is talking about it... 👇👇👇👇👇 Mike Huckabee: "I Guarantee This Supreme Court Case Is Real..." When I first started covering the Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case‚ I got a lot of doubts and complaints. Grumbling‚ really. I compared it to the Israelites in the desert. Fair comparison. People saying the case wasn't real... People asking why The Gateway Pundit and Epoch Times hadn't covered it if it was real.... All this despite the fact that I showed the Supreme Court website and docket confirming it was real. Still‚ grumbling. And then? Then the Gateway Pundit covered it. Then the Epoch Times covered it. Now? Now Mike Huckabee is covering it‚ and not only that he says "I guarantee this is real". The leader paving the way always gets some slings and arrows in his back‚ and that's ok.  I'm used to it. But I was right and you should trust my reporting. We don't run with a story if it's not verified. And I had this one locked down to the "T". As in‚ President T may be returning soon! Here is Mike Huckabee: The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably --- PLEASE consider this the longest of long shots --- overturn the election of 2020‚ throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again‚ even for town dogcatcher. The case has been added to the docket for‚ appropriately‚ January 6‚ 2023. There’s essentially no media attention being given to this case; most news outlets find it much too hot to touch. But the heat doesn’t faze us; we keep a pair of oven mitts close by for times like this. As Joshua Philipp reported in a podcast for EPOCH TV‚ the case Brunson v. Alma Adams‚ et. al.‚ alleges that members of Congress who voted against the proposed 10-day audit of the 2020 elections and certifying those results --- with no investigation after being “properly warned” of a credible threat from enemies of the Constitution --- were violating their oath of office to “preserve‚ protect and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic.” It says that “this action unilaterally violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and perhaps the rights of every person living‚ and all courts of law.” If SCOTUS ruled in favor of the plaintiffs‚ the remedy would conceivably involve removing the sitting President and Vice President and all those representatives and empower the Court to authorize the swearing-in of the rightful President and Vice President. Not kidding; that’s the remedy the plaintiffs are asking for. The Brunson brothers are an interesting group –- literally a band of brothers‚ as they play in a trumpet band. Here they are‚ with their summary of the suit‚ which was reportedly written by just themselves‚ without legal counsel (!). https://ralandbrunson.com Note: Philipp’s report was made before SCOTUS agreed to hear the case‚ and he said then he would be “very surprised” if they did. So I guess he’s very surprised right now. Actually‚ I am‚ too‚ considering the way the Court refused to look into those very allegations in the weeks after the election‚ when they were brought by President Trump. (Of course‚ now we know much more about the lengths to which Trump’s enemies went to interfere with the outcome. Maybe enough Justices are feeling some guilt right now about calling the issue “moot.”) Philipp also pointed out that this segment of his show‚ “Crossroads‚” would not be allowed on YouTube. (Good news‚ though: he can now post the link on Twitter!) We’ll include the EPOCH TV link here… https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-weighs-on-brunson-v-alma-case-that-could-overturn-2020-election_4907648.html The argument in this case is that by not looking into serious allegations of election fraud‚ those who voted to confirm the results of the 2020 election broke their oath of office and are ineligible to run for any elected office again. To give you an idea of the scope of the potential fallout‚ Kamala Harris is in that group‚ and so is Mike Pence. This started as two separate lawsuits brought by four brothers in Utah‚ but only one of them is advancing to the Supreme Court. To get it there‚ the brothers bypassed the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals‚ where it was stalled‚ by saying in a cover letter that this suit was a matter of national security. The Court was apparently so interested in this case that they received a personal call from the Court clerk asking how soon they could get their documents together. The brothers got it all to them in one week. The suit names President Biden‚ VP Harris‚ former VP Pence‚ and 385 members of Congress‚ and‚ no‚ that is not a typo. Those are all the members who voted against a proposition for them to investigate claims that “enemies of the Constitution rigged the 2020 election.” So‚ this case is NOT about whether or not election fraud occurred. It’s about whether or not these people violated their oath by failing to investigate credible allegations of election rigging by enemies of the Constitution –- allegations that had been made by over a hundred of their own colleagues. In their words: “Is this about a rigged election? No‚ it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation‚ thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.” The suit says this violation is an act of treason and fraud. “A successfully rigged election has the same effect as an act of war: to place into power whom the victor wants‚ which in this case is Biden‚ who‚ if not stopped immediately‚ will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.” “When the allegations of a rigged election came forward‚ the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office.” According to Philipp‚ a finding for the plaintiffs would “also restore Trump to office because he would have been the legitimate candidate.” We’re not yet sure how that part of the argument works but are researching. Even if a majority of the Justices found merit in this case‚ would they be willing to do something this huge? They would be keeping in mind the potential consequences and‚ of course‚ possible effects on the balance of power. If this happened‚ it would be the wildest things ever to happen within our government --- a purge‚ really‚ which‚ I have to admit‚ sounds pretty great with the state our country is currently in. But you know the saying‚ if something sounds too good to be true‚ it probably is. And here is more of my original reporting: TRUMPet Supreme Court Case Moving Forward! Several weeks ago‚ I was one of the ONLY websites to tell you about Brunson v. Adams‚ the Supreme Court Case that may upend the 2020 election steal. In fact‚ I was so early that many people doubted it was real. Our articles are ALWAYS real. If I can't vet the article‚ I don't run it. And this was 100% vetted by the best source possible: the Supreme Court website! That's kind of what it means to be a journalist.... You take in all the information and sometimes you break the story! That's what we did here. So much so that one comment I read to my article said: I don't think it's real‚ I haven't seen the Epoch Times or Gateway Pundit cover it! Well....with all apologies to the commenter‚ the Epoch Times covered it shortly thereafter and The Gateway Pundit covered it today....again. I'm still waiting for my apology from the commenter (I forget who it was‚ they are not memorable) but I won't stay up all night waiting. In all seriousness‚ the story is VERY real and very exciting! From my friends at The Gateway Pundit‚ here is Tim Canova: While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting‚ that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election. In contrast‚ a little-known case that appeared recently on the Court docket could do just that. The case of Brunson v. Adams‚ not even reported in the mainstream media‚ was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris‚ along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6‚ 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency. The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6‚ 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward. It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for Justices‚ and thereby open the door to packing the Court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III‚ Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.” In addition to such institutional threats to the Supreme Court‚ several Justices and their families have been living under constant threats to their personal security since the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Perhaps these institutional and security threats have provided powerful incentives for the Court to put Brunson v. Adams on its dockets as a shield to deter any efforts by the lame duck Congress to infringe on the Court’s independence. Or perhaps conservatives on the Court are serious about using the Brunson case as a sword to remove public officials who they believe have violated their constitutional Oaths of office by rubber-stamping Electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of serious allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference. Moreover‚ recent weeks have brought a cascade of news suggesting the likelihood of an impending constitutional crisis that could be difficult to resolve without the Court’s intervention. It is now clear that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was colluding with social media giants Twitter and Facebook to censor news of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election – a most egregious First Amendment violation intended to rig the election outcome and perhaps to install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government. Meanwhile‚ the January 6th committee may soon send a criminal referral to the Justice Department to arrest President Trump even though his reinstated tweets are a reminder that he was not calling for insurrection but for peaceful protest on January 6th. More recently‚ the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was reportedly working with Big Tech to censor election critics.   Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election‚ we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit. When they break the Constitution — the supreme law of the land — to rig an election‚ the only recourse may be the Supreme Court or military tribunals.   As the Brunson lawsuit argues‚ all of Congress was put on notice prior to its January 6th vote by more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations. Moreover‚ the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was required to submit a report on foreign threats to the 2020 Presidential election by December 18‚ 2020. That deadline was set by executive order and by Congress itself. When December 18th came and went without ODNI submitting its report‚ Congress should have started asking questions and investigating. In fact‚ DNI John Ratcliffe announced on that day that the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies he was overseeing had found evidence of foreign election interference but were split as to its significance and whether such breach of national security was sufficient to overturn the outcome of the election. And yet there was no action whatsoever by Congress‚ no inquiry and no investigation. Instead‚ Congress approved the possibly fraudulent election results on January 6th without asking any questions of the DNI and the Intelligence Community. When the results of the 1876 presidential election were in doubt‚ Congress created a special Electoral Commission made up of five House members‚ five Senators‚ and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate. In contrast‚ in early 2021 Congress had nearly two weeks to investigate before the January 20th date of the Presidential Inauguration. Had Congress waited even just one more day to January 7th‚ they would have received the long-awaited ODNI report reflecting a split in the Intelligence Community and the DNI’s own conclusion that the People’s Republic of China had interfered to influence the outcome of the presidential election. As Dr. Barry A. Zulauf‚ the Analytic Ombudsman for the Intelligence Community‚ concluded at the time‚ the Intelligence Community shamefully delayed their findings until after the January 6th Electoral College certification by Congress because of their political disagreements with the Trump administration. This paints a picture of collusion and conspiracy involving members of Congress and U.S. intelligence agencies to coverup evidence of foreign election interference and constituting the crime of High Treason. The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen‚ merely that a large majority of Congress‚ by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security‚ violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies‚ foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military. And if all of this is new to you‚ please allow me to bring you up to speed! Here was my most recent post explaining it all: TRUMPet Brothers Supreme Court Case Update! Simplified and Next Steps EXPLAINED! I continue to be laser focused on this Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case... And the more I learn the more I am blown away! And the more I am encouraged we have something very big happening here! I have a simplified summary of the case for everyone who is still confused and I also have an INCREDIBLE video you need to watch. Plus my take on what the next key date is... First‚ a few housekeeping comments. I know there is general fatigue out there. People are tired. People are weary. We've seen disappointments and defeats along the way and I fear that just as the victory is about to present itself‚ too many people have fallen asleep‚ became complacent or became downright grumpy! Take heart friends! I can't guarantee this case will be successful‚ but it does seem to have almost everything going for it. And I can promise you this: God will not fail.  That part I know. There might be a delay --- and how appropriate this is ADVENT season --- the season of waiting. Did you know that? Speaking of the Bible‚ I have a general warning and caution for anyone who has fallen asleep‚ became complacent or outright grumpy‚ and that warning is this: make sure you don't become an Exodus 14:11-12 Israelite. Exodus 14:11-12 They said to Moses‚ “Why did you bring us out of Egypt? Did you bring us out here in the desert to die? We could have died peacefully in Egypt; there were plenty of graves in Egypt. We told you this would happen! In Egypt we said‚ ‘Please don’t bother us. Let us stay and serve the Egyptians.’ It would have been better for us to stay and be slaves than to come out here and die in the desert.” The parallels are so apt.We've been calling for a Red Sea moment since the 2020 election was stolen‚ and now with our backs against the waters what I read in the comments section sounds EXACTLY like what I read above from Exodus.Don't go there.Take heart!Take hope!Hold strong!Stay in the fight! Now let me give you my short paraphrase of the case‚ as well as a short summary from The American Thinker and then I'll roll into a video that you HAVE TO see. Here's the short summary... You have 4 brothers‚ the Brunson Brothers. A couple of the brothers are attorneys. All four of the brothers are semi-famous for their TRUMPet playing. How cool is that? You can't make this stuff up. So the four brothers start asking the lawyer brothers what can be done about the election fraud. They come up with a theory. They file in Utah. That case stalls out in the 10th Circuit‚ intentional delay. So then they fine a "loophole" to file it directly to the Supreme Court. And guess what? 95% of cases are never taken by the Supreme Court.  They're simply ignored‚ and if they get ignored they are essentially rejected. The SCOTUS only chooses to accept a very small amount of cases filed. But in this case they don't ignore this one. In fact‚ according to reports‚ the Clerk of the Supreme Court reaches out to the brothers and tells them they need to make a couple changes to their filing...and they ask how quickly that can happen. The brothers say 2-4 weeks and the Court says please hurry. The brothers get it done in 1 week‚ and almost as soon as it's filed it is ACCEPTED by the SCOTUS. This already defies almost all odds. You need 4 Supreme Court Justices to agree to take a case and obviously 5 to win when the case is heard. I've seen comments from people saying: "This court is corrupt‚ they will never do anything about the election!" Oh how soon you forget! That's why God told Israel to build EBENEZER stones in the Bible...so they would not forget things so quickly! It was less than 6 months ago that this court did the unthinkable: they overturned Roe vs. Wade after 50 years! Did you forget about that? This same court may very well do the same thing here. At least 4 of them have already seemingly tipped their hand that they will. And it may end up being in their own self interest‚ because if they don't act the court may end up getting "Court Packed" by Liberals in the upcoming lame duck session. Very dangerous. Here's more from The American Thinker: "The Question: How can you support‚ and defend‚ the Constitution against all enemies‚ foreign and domestic?  Answer: You investigate.  If there are claims that there is a threat‚ even if you don't believe there is a threat‚ you investigate.  How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate?  You can't.  Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution?  Yes.  Where did these serious claims come from?  100 members of Congress.  What was the threat?  That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election.  Is this lawsuit about a rigged election?  No‚ it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation.  Was this a clear violation of their oath?  YES." —Question of Law in the Supreme Court case known as Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al. (Biden‚ Harris‚ Pence &; 385 Members of Congress) They Broke Their Oaths Loy‚ Raland‚ Deron‚ and Gaynor Brunson all witnessed what they believed to be the theft of the 2020 election and decided to file suit.  However‚ the interesting approach that they have taken is not to make a formal complaint that the election was stolen; instead‚ they have chosen to sue members of the U.S. Congress who voted not to investigate whether any election irregularities may have occurred that could have affected the outcome.  In other words‚ the Brunson Brothers were motivated to sue because these elected officials broketheir oaths to protect the Constitution of the United States. The Brunson Brothers believed that‚ to support and defend the Constitution‚ an investigation into possible fraud needed to take place.  Otherwise‚ how could anyone know with certainty whether the election had been secure? What shocked the Brunson Brothers was that only 147 members of the US Congress voted in support of the proposed ten-day audit of the election before certifying the ballot count of the Electoral College‚ while‚ according to the Washington Post‚ 377 members voted against the proposed ten-day investigation‚ and eight abstained. Supreme Court Docket No. 22-380 Eventually‚ the case — Raland J. Brunson‚ Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams‚ et al.— ended up on the docket of the Supreme Court .  The "Questions Presented" section‚ in Raland J. Brunson's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari‚ goes like this: A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from this Court and lower appeal courts‚ along with constitutional provisions and statutes‚ in deciding whether the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case. This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression‚ and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress‚ while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal‚ State‚ County or local Governments found within the United States of America‚ and at the same time the trial court also has the authority‚ to be validated by this Court‚ to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States. In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country.  These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice.  Equitable maxim created by this court‚ which the lower court used to dismiss this case‚ sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions. These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts‚ which has not‚ but should be‚ settled by this Court without delay. So...what is next? That's the really fun part. A ruling could come at ANY minute! Literally today (on a Sunday)‚ tomorrow‚ Friday‚ later this month‚ January....we don't know. But there is nothing stopping the SCOTUS from ruling on this immediately. Here's my speculation....what if it came on December 24? Bo Polny has told us to watch 9/24‚ 10/24‚ 11/24 and 12/24. Many people said nothing has happened‚ except if you look at the filings in this case‚ they've all happened on the 23/24 of the month: Next up: December 24. Christmas Eve. And what did Kim Clement say about Winter and Christmas? "I will make them happy‚ says the LORD!" Is this the year we get our big Christmas surprise? Keep reading for the video... The "Trumpet Brothers" Supreme Court Case Could RULE At Any Moment! Simple Explanation! This is gonna blow some minds... A lot of minds I assume! Let's start with October 24 and November 24‚ two key dates Bo Polny told us to watch. Nothing happened‚ right? Wrong! It turns out‚ perhaps the biggest Supreme Court case EVER to be filed was filed on October 24 with reply deadline on November 24 and this thing is going to absolutely blow your mind! We've covered it before‚ but I know it can be a little confusing so I have the PERFECT explanation of what is going on. Juan O'Savin (who I really like!) was on Elijah Streams today and he laid it all out. I mean‚ everything! It was SO easy to understand and by the end I couldn't even sit down‚ I was just pacing in my room with excitement! Folks‚ it's all coming together. You have to understand this: the Clerk of the Supreme Court contacted the Brunson Brothers and asked them if they could speed up their filing! That is almost unprecedented! The Supreme Court wants this case! And if it's successful‚ the end result means all 388 people elected in 2020‚ including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were elected Unconstitutionally and they DO NOT HOLD public office! They'd be gone in one moment! Just like Bo Polny told us‚ in a 24 hours period‚ everything changes! Wiped out! Gone! Trump immediately back in‚ as if he never left! And here's more beauty to the case: they don't have to prove election fraud! The case is much simpler than that. Oh‚ and the case comes from four TRUMPet players‚ and the meaning of "four" is actually very significant‚ as Juan explains. It's the final act! The final kill shot to the Bull. I don't want to spoil too much‚ but the Bull = Moloch. Just trust me on this‚ this will be the BEST video you've seen in a long time‚ perhaps ever! Yes‚ I mean that. Watch here on Rumble and then leave a comment and let me know what you think: Here's a lot more about the Brunson Brothers and their Supreme Court case.... Remember‚ we were one of the FIRST news outlets to report on this! Check this out: For more on that‚ you can watch their interview below‚ and near the end they talk about how they play the TRUMPet... What a coincidence! Watch here on Rumble: Now let's wrap things up by getting back to my friend Bo Polny. And if you still have no idea about what I'm talking about‚ keep reading and I will fill you in... HUGE Update On “Miracle” SCOTUS Case! About a week ago‚ we reported on a HUGE case to reach the Supreme Court. We were one of the first to do so. In fact‚ even now not many outlets are reporting on this. But it's 100% real and verified by the court docket. Let me bring everyone up to speed on what the case is first before I give you the updates. It turns out‚ a huge case (a Petition for a writ of certiorari) was filed with the Supreme Court of the United States  (SCOTUS) just last month... The case is captioned: Raland J. Brunson‚ Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams‚ et al. And now the updates! A response was due from the Defendants by November 23‚ 2022...and we got one! Actually we got a VERY STRANGE one. They didn't ignore it or refuse to reply. They actually filed a reply but waived their right to respond! Yes‚ you read that and understood that correctly... The Government WAIVED its right to respond. Here is the actual filing (which you can see for yourself is real right here on SupremeCourt.gov): Folks‚ this is crazy! The case is real. It's moving forward. The Government just WAIVED its rights. And the stage is set for something truly epic! Bo Polny Predicted The Bitcoin Crash TO THE DAY‚ Here's What Comes Next... I had Bo Polny back on my show today and we talked a LOT about crypto... If you've been following the crypto markets or even just the news in general‚ you know crypto had an ugly week. Huge crash... Big players and exchanges going bankrupt over night! In fact‚ I'm working on a big story right now that is set to expose and explain exactly how we may have just uncovered the biggest money laundering operation of all time... And it may just be the thing that brings down Joe Biden and the entire evil regime. Yes‚ it's that big. Here's a sneak-peak: 🧐 pic.twitter.com/kS5ZWrfPfs — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) November 13‚ 2022 But here's the deal... Bo Polny predicted the EXACT DAY of the crash with perfection! He told his Newsletter subscribers back in October this was coming. I couldn't post about it ahead of time out of respect for the people that subscribe to his Newsletter‚ but now that it happened and he was right to the very day‚ I had to have him back on my show to break it all down. We had a blast‚ and yes we also talked about September 24‚ October 24 and November 24. You might be surprised to learn some of the details! We also talked about Switzerland‚ the Egyptian Sphinx on top of Europe‚ gold and silver and a lot more! Oh and of course Donald Trump! This is so good and I'm excited for you to hear it. Watch safely here on Rumble: Backup here on YouTube: Download Bo's slides for free: https://qrco.de/bdUurf If you want Bo's trading Newsletter‚ go to https://www.gold2020forecast.com/cryptocurrency-index  use code WLT49. (LIMITED TIME) For access to the Easy Crypto School‚ go to https://www.easycryptoschool.com  use code WLT49. (LIMITED TIME) The discounts are only good for a short time‚ so grab them if you want now. The entire history of the Newsletter is available to you when you sign up‚ which is something I love. You can go back and read and see exactly how accurate Bo has been: And then for anyone who wants to get started but is scared to do it wrong or doesn't know how‚ this is for you. A trusted guide‚ from a trusted friend. There's a lot of bad stuff out there‚ but I'm always happy to send people to Bo's Easy Crypto School: Enjoy!

Just when you think you’ve heard it all…. And just when you think you couldn’t possibly loathe Nikki Haley any more than I already do‚ you get something new like this. Actually‚ it isn’t “new” but it may be “new to you”. It was new to me. Probably because this comes from Nikki’s 2012 book‚ and just as I don’t care about her now‚ I didn’t care about her back then either. But major credit to Anons for digging and putting this gem back in the spotlight. Haley admits‚ even gleefully recounts‚ how she started calling her husband by “Michael” simply because she didn’t like his given name “Bill” and she thought he looked more like a Michael. Unreal. I love the summary Alex puts on this: Nikki Haley made her husband change his first name because she didn’t like it LMAO. That Karen energy needs to stay far away from the Oval Office.https://t.co/d5FPGmuBHh — Alex Bruesewitz (@alexbruesewitz) January 5‚ 2024 From Fox News‚ here are more details on the story from the book: Nearly 12 years ago‚ now-Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley wrote about how she renamed her husband‚ which resurfaced amid the Republican primary. A senior politics correspondent for Vox took to social media on Wednesday and posted an excerpt from her 2012 book “Can’t Is Not an Option” in which Haley recounted how she modified how people refer to her now-husband‚ Michael Haley. “You may be wondering how ‘Bill’ became South Carolina First Gentleman Michael Haley‚” Haley wrote in her book. “After we started dating‚ I looked at him one day and said‚ ‘What’s your name?’” “‘You know it’s Bill‚’ he said‚ puzzled.” “‘You just don’t look like a Bill. What’s your whole name?’” “‘William Michael.’” “From that point on‚ I started calling him Michael‚ and all my friends did the same. When he transferred to Clemson his sophomore year‚ my friends became his friends‚ and before we knew it‚ he was universally known as Michael. Everyone who knew him before I did knows him as Bill‚ and everyone who met him after I did knows him as Michael.” “He looks like a Michael‚” she wrote. The responses on Twitter are HILARIOUS…. SugarLuvsU4sho points out that the woman who once famously said it should be a law that everyone on social media use their real names is the same person who does not call her husband by his real name: She also said that it should be a law that every one who uses social media should be required to use their real name — (@sugarluvsu4sho) January 5‚ 2024 Oh the irony! But then again‚ she changed her own name too! Her REAL name is Nimarata Randhawa — gee “Nikki” what’s wrong with that name? Why did you change that one? It seems to be the way with her since she changed her name as well going by Nikki Haley when her real name is Nimarata Randhawa! — Emily (@Emily42420) January 5‚ 2024 Unhealthy‚ narcissistic behavior is 100% correct: That is unhealthy‚ narcissistic behavior lmfao — ConservamemeHQ (@ConservamemeHQ) January 5‚ 2024 Here’s more on Nikki’s own name change: Vivek Ramaswamy Reveals Nikki Haley’s Real Name Vivek Ramaswamy took a jab at Nikki Haley on his campaign website. In a new post‚ Ramaswamy called out Haley for claiming that he doesn’t support Israel. The Vivek campaign wrote “WRONG. Keep lying‚ Nimarata Randhawa.” The post continued “The desperation is showing. By the end of Vivek’s first term‚ the US-Israel relationship will be deeper and stronger than ever because it won’t be a client relationship‚ it will be a true friendship.” Nimarata Randhawa is Nikki Haley’s birth name but since childhood‚ she has been called by close friends and family Nikki. Vivek Ramaswamy to Nikki Haley: “Keep lying Nimarata Randhawa” Vivek Ramaswamy used Nikki Haley maiden name on his website because of the heated exchange they had on the debate. Vivek Ramaswamy is irritated of Nikki Haley for telling the TRUTH and EXPOSING him for who he is! pic.twitter.com/etE1Mqx41A — Dark Brandon (The 46) (@ajalexander944) August 29‚ 2023 Here’s what Fox News shared: Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley is hitting back at GOP nomination rival Vivek Ramaswamy‚ who called her “lying Namrata (sic)‚” referencing her given Indian name and originally misspelling it on the website. On a new page on the newcomer’s campaign website called “TRUTH. Over myth‚” Ramaswamy‚ a multi-millionaire biotech entrepreneur‚ author‚ and culture wars crusader‚ attempts to set the record straight on Haley’s recent jabs at his foreign policy positions. One such criticism is Ramaswamy’s position on U.S. support to Israel‚ an accusation leveled by Haley last week during the first GOP presidential nomination debate – and reiterated on Monday at Haley’s town hall in Indian Land‚ South Carolina. “WRONG. Keep lying‚ Namrata (sic) Randhawa. The desperation is showing‚” Ramaswamy’s website read earlier today. It has since been updated with the correct spelling for Haley’s birth name. “Nimarata Randhawa” appears to be a reference to Haley’s birth name of Indian origin‚ but it leaves out “Nikki‚” which is her legal middle name that she goes by. Policy differences between two Indian-Americans seeking GOP nomination get personal. Vivek Ramaswamy‚ on his website‚ tells Nikki Haley‚ “Keep lying‚ Nimarata Randhawa.” Nikki Haley says he has a “childish‚ demeaning side.” (Like Bobby Jindal‚ she changed her name and religion.) — Brahma Chellaney (@Chellaney) August 29‚ 2023 Per Times of India: Indian-origin Republican candidate Nikki Haley has lashed out at her GOP rival Vivek Ramaswamy after the entrepreneur’s “childish” reference to her Indian birth name on his website. The two Indian-origin candidates‚ who are vying for a Republican nomination for the 2024 US Presidential polls‚ have been taking potshots at each other over the last few weeks with the GOP race getting intense. Haley has called out Ramaswamy for his “lack of foreign policy experience” and has been targeting him over his position on America’s ties with Israel. During the GOP debate last week‚ the former South Carolina governor said that Ramaswamy wants US to stop funding Israel. Haley repeated her charge at Monday’s town hall. Hitting back‚ Ramaswamy’s campaign website referred to Haley by her birth name and said that her “desperation is showing”. “WRONG. Keep lying‚ Namrata (sic) Randhawa. The desperation is showing‚” Ramaswamy’s website read earlier with an incorrect spelling of her birth name. The spelling was later rectified. Nimarata Randhawa is Nikki Haley’s birth name Here’s what led to Vivek calling out Nikki on his campaign site: Vivek Ramaswamy to Nikki Haley: “I wish you well in your future career on the boards of Lockheed and Raytheon.”#VivekRamaswamy pic.twitter.com/vray5YyJil — Longbow Foolride (@LFoolride) August 24‚ 2023 Nikki Haley — EXPOSED I don’t think she has a snowball’s chance in hell of winning the primary‚ but nevertheless I want to make sure we take those odds all the way down to zero. Because we do not need the war-mongering NEO-con RINO anywhere near our Government. So now I give you Nikki Haley exposed….in her own words. Here is a wonderful montage of 3 minutes of Nikki Haley telling you EXACTLY who she is. And it ain’t someone I want as President or anywhere in Government for that matter. NO MORE RINOS. No Nikki Haley. Watch for yourself: Meet Nikki Haley.Anti-Trump‚ pro-JEB!Climate change defender.Supports Black Lives Matter.Against federal abortion ban.Passed red flag gun law in SC.Pushed Russia meddling hoax.Wants to expand worker visa program.Believes immigrants are more patriotic than Americans. What… pic.twitter.com/TabAgjt3jc — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) September 5‚ 2023  

New York Attorney General Letitia James requested an additional $120 million in her civil fraud lawsuit against Donald Trump and his co-defendants. James originally sought $250 million in the lawsuit‚ bringing the total fine amount to $370 million. “The myriad deceptive schemes they employed to inflate asset values and conceal facts were so outrageous that they belie innocent explanation‚” James wrote. Happening Now: New York AG Letitia James has decided to increase the amount she wants from Donald Trump in his civil trial. Initially she requested $250 million‚ but now wants $370 million plus interest on that from over a decade. I hope everyone can see this for what it… pic.twitter.com/xE9lDnTUJQ — Travis (@Travis_in_Flint) January 5‚ 2024 She also called for a lifetime ban on Donald Trump and two of his former company executives from the real estate industry in the state. NBC News reports: Attorneys from James’ office requested the punishment in post-trial motions filed Friday in the Trump fraud case. They said that Trump owes $168 million of interest allegedly saved through fraud; $152 million from the sale of the Old Post Office building in Washington‚ D.C.‚ the site of one of Trump’s hotels; $60 million through the transfer of the Ferry Point Golf Course contract; and $2.5 million from severance agreements for former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Howard Weisselberg and ex-Trump Organization controller Jeff McConney. James also called for lifetime bans for Trump‚ Weisselberg and McConney from participation in the real estate industry as well as from serving as officers or directors in New York corporations or entities. The attorney general also asked for five-year bans for Trump’s eldest sons‚ Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump‚ with the same conditions. The summary judgment in the case found the former president‚ his company and top executives liable for repeated and persistent fraud in preparing and certifying as true Trump’s statements of financial condition‚ which were falsely inflated by between $812 million and $2.2 billion. Trump has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and called the lawsuit a partisan “witch hunt.” He has vowed to appeal the judge’s ruling. “Letitia James is doing this to me‚ No Victims‚ No Crime‚ Great Financial Statements‚ yet Murder and other Violent Crime is RAGING OUT OF CONTROL in New York‚ as People and Businesses flee‚ in Record Numbers‚ to other States!” Trump said Friday on Truth Social. Letitia James is doing this to me‚ No Victims‚ No Crime‚ Great Financial Statements‚ yet Murder and other Violent Crime is RAGING OUT OF CONTROL in New York‚ as People and Businesses flee‚ in Record Numbers‚ to other States! Donald Trump Social 03:22 PM EST 01/05/24 — Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) January 5‚ 2024 JUST IN – New York Attorney General AG Letitia James @TishJames seeks $370 million from President Trump in his civil trial. She just increased the amount from $250 million to $370 million. This is nothing more than a WITCH HUNT! https://t.co/6DMc3F77d6 — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) January 5‚ 2024 From Just the News: Presiding Judge Arthur Engoron already found Trump could be held liable for defrauding banks and insurers by inflating the value of his assets‚ the issue at the center of the case. He also ordered Trump’s business certificates be canceled in New York. Trump’s attorneys argued on Friday that Engoron should reject the most recent allegations by James‚ arguing that they are beyond the statute of limitations‚ according to CNN. “There is no evidence in the record that the terms or pricing of any of the subject loans would have been different based on the purported misstatements alleged by Plaintiff‚” Trump’s lawyers wrote‚ according to the outlet. “Not a single witness from any bank (or anywhere else) testified to this at trial.”

Luke…..I am your father! And Chelsea‚ Bill is NOT your fatherrrrrrr — at least that is‚ according to Juanita Broaddrick. More on that in a minute‚ but first I can’t gloss over a really interesting Mandella Effect story…. Do you know the Mandella Effect? It’s this very strange phenomenon where most of the population all remembers something one way‚ and it turns out it did not happen that way. It’s named after Nelson Mandella who millions of people remember dying in prison‚ but that never actually happened. Mass psychosis? It’s so fascinating‚ one day I am going to do a full article on it. But the famous line from Star Wars where Darth Vader says to Luke:  “Luke — I am your father” never actually happened! Nope. He says‚ “No‚ I am your father.” Watch for yourself: Crazy‚ right? Ok‚ now back to our story. Speaking of fathers‚ Juanity Broaddrick just posted this: After Bill Clinton viciously raped me – he said‚ “Don’t worry‚ I’m sterile due to mumps when I was a boy.” Then he told me‚ “You’d better put some ice on that‚” pointing to my swollen and bleeding lip. There are good men…….and then there’s Bill Clinton. — Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) January 4‚ 2024 After Bill Clinton viciously raped me – he said‚ “Don’t worry‚ I’m sterile due to mumps when I was a boy.” Then he told me‚ “You’d better put some ice on that‚” pointing to my swollen and bleeding lip. There are good men……. and then there’s Bill Clinton. At first it didn’t jump out to me right away…. But then I read it again and it was like a giant lightbulb going off over my head. If what she says is true‚ then Bill Clinton is not Chelsea’s father. He couldn’t be. Juanita herself followed that first Tweet up with a second one confirming the implication we all drew from the first Tweet: TRUE https://t.co/NcYcjgiS9M — Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) January 5‚ 2024 I’m not here to judge whether or not what she said is true‚ I’m just reporting that the verified Twitter account for Juanita Broaddrick‚ with over 1 Million Followers‚ just posted that Bill Clinton has been sterile since he was a child. If that’s true‚ then that would make THIS story below make a lot of sense‚ wouldn’t it? Chelsea Clinton’s Real Father REVEALED? DISCLAIMER: I am not reporting this as factually correct‚ I’m merely reporting that many people out there BELIEVE Bill Clinton is not Chelsea Clinton’s real father. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. SECOND DISCLAIMER: I know many of you have seen this before and are aware of it‚ but many may not be. Ok‚ here we go. Simply put‚ many people believe Chelsea looks much less like Bill…. Chelsea and Bill pic.twitter.com/uiSTvmdCeo — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) November 10‚ 2023 And much more like a guy named Webb Hubbell: Chelsea and Webb pic.twitter.com/OsYIxGjwgp — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) November 10‚ 2023 Again‚ not MY take….I’m just reporting on what all these people think: From 2015 Chelsea Clinton Book Tour. Question to Chelsea Clinton: “Has your mother ever told you that you’re the daughter of Webb Hubbell‚ and not Bill Clinton?” A: “I am so proud to be my parents’ daughter‚” responded Chelsea Clinton to the question.Source: CBS News. pic.twitter.com/ZUuehAIruE — Mo Green (@KeithRuscitti) May 22‚ 2023 TWO of Webb Hubbell’s four daughters. Chelsea Clinton on the left/Rebecca Hubbell on the right… pic.twitter.com/Q7MhcnYidN — Sensible Southerner (@Rriittzziiee) June 11‚ 2022 Chelsea Clinton couldn’t sneak up on a glass of water because she’s Webb Hubbell and Crooked Hillary’s coyote ugly offspring‚ plain and simple #HogJaws pic.twitter.com/CR2sezK3P4 — Mike Engleman (@RealHickory) January 29‚ 2023 You do know The National Enquirer tends to get things right more often than the MSM‚ right? Chelsea Clinton would like to wish Webster Hubbell a Happy Father’s Day! pic.twitter.com/GAmBOoOxpR — LivePDDave (@LivePDDave1) June 20‚ 2021 Father’s Day is a tough one for old Chels? Who does Chelsea Clinton buy a Father’s Day gift for… Slick Willie or Webb Hubbell? pic.twitter.com/XSGyO1MIvq — LivePDDave (@LivePDDave1) June 18‚ 2021 Which do you think? Just every time hillary is laying! The real father of Chelsea Clinton is weber hubble but bill Clinton laying #1 laying #2 with Christopher steele dossier laying #4 email probe laying #5 uranium one scandals laying #6 hillary foundation falsification &; the like hillary is layer! pic.twitter.com/7H8xfO5kJ5 — Endeshaw Mekonnen (@EndeshawMekonn1) October 19‚ 2019 The Business Standard has previously reported the following (NOTE: not my take‚ I am quoting the Business Standard): Bill Clinton’s former aide has claimed that the former president had once admitted that Chelsea Clinton is not his biological daughter. According to Larry Nichols‚ the 42nd President of the United States had allegedly said the real father is the former mayor of Little Rock‚ Ark.‚ Webster Hubbell‚ who was once a law partner of his wife Hillary Clinton‚ Radar Online reported. Nichols said that Bill had admitted that he “shoots blanks” after contracting measles as a kid rendered him sterile‚ and added that Hubbell was the real father of his daughter‚ who is currently pregnant with her first child with her husband Marc Mezvinsky. Earlier‚ anti-Clinton blogger Robert Morrow had claimed that Hillary had an affair with Hubbell in 1984 at the Governor’s Mansion during Bill’s second term. That all said‚ if Juanita’s claim is correct‚ it would make the Webb Hubbell story make more sense‚ but it would mean this other story below would be impossible: Meet Bill Clinton’s “Lost” Son? Meet Danney Williams. As with Chelsea and Webb Hubbell‚ the resemblance is fairly uncanny. At least I think so. I’m no doctor and I haven’t ran a DNA test‚ but man oh man do Hillary and Webb look similar! And the same goes for Danney and Bill. Check this out: Do you know about the Black man that claims he is the son of Bill Clinton? pic.twitter.com/34soYxMz5q — Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) December 6‚ 2023 Danney is on Twitter/X and has been VERY vocal about his allegations that Bill is his father. Here is his post from 2017: Even though you abandoned me and only took care of Chelsea‚ I still want to thank you for giving me life. Happy Father’s Day @billclinton. pic.twitter.com/EMKla9lPM1 — Danney Williams (@danney_williams) June 18‚ 2017 You look at those pictures and tell me what you think? Do they look similar? If a picture could talk‚ I can almost hear this one saying “I did not have sex with that woman!” Danney has remained adamant in his claims‚ also posting this picture of HIS son with hashtag #BillClintonGrandson: My baby boy . #BillClintonGrandson pic.twitter.com/oqHUDYTs4n — Danney Williams (@danney_williams) June 10‚ 2020 Why don’t they just take a paternity test you ask? Danney has tried. Many times. Bill is seemingly not interested: On Father’s Day Danney Williams Calls on Bill Clinton to Take Paternity Test https://t.co/7maGA6epcS via @gatewaypundit — The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) June 17‚ 2018 The Gateway Pundit reported the following back in 2018 on Father’s Day: Today is a happy day for most fathers and sons. But not for Danney Williams. Danney claims he is Bill Clinton’s illegitimate son. The 27-year-old black man from Arkansas put new pressure on the former President and his wife Hillary. Danney’s mother‚ a prostitute who lived in Arkansas in the mid-1980s‚ claimed she had sex with the the Arkansas governor at the time. In her interview‚ Bobbie said that Clinton rubbed her belly and said‚ “Girl‚ that can’t be my baby.” But I knew it was. I just had this kind of woman’s feeling that this was his child”. The liberal media ignored or attacked Danney Williams during the election. So…what do you think? What a tangled web we weave….and what a messed up family tree over at the Clinton family! ALLLLLEGEDLY! From one real son never admitted (??)(allegedly) we go to one daughter falsely claimed (??)(allegedly): Chelsea Clinton’s Real Father REVEALED? DISCLAIMER: I am not reporting this as factually correct‚ I’m merely reporting that many people out there BELIEVE Bill Clinton is not Chelsea Clinton’s real father. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. SECOND DISCLAIMER: I know many of you have seen this before and are aware of it‚ but many may not be. Ok‚ here we go. Simply put‚ many people believe Chelsea looks much less like Bill…. Chelsea and Bill pic.twitter.com/uiSTvmdCeo — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) November 10‚ 2023 And much more like a guy named Webb Hubbell: Chelsea and Webb pic.twitter.com/OsYIxGjwgp — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) November 10‚ 2023 Again‚ not MY take….I’m just reporting on what all these people think: From 2015 Chelsea Clinton Book Tour. Question to Chelsea Clinton: “Has your mother ever told you that you’re the daughter of Webb Hubbell‚ and not Bill Clinton?” A: “I am so proud to be my parents’ daughter‚” responded Chelsea Clinton to the question.Source: CBS News. pic.twitter.com/ZUuehAIruE — Mo Green (@KeithRuscitti) May 22‚ 2023 TWO of Webb Hubbell’s four daughters. Chelsea Clinton on the left/Rebecca Hubbell on the right… pic.twitter.com/Q7MhcnYidN — Sensible Southerner (@Rriittzziiee) June 11‚ 2022 Chelsea Clinton couldn’t sneak up on a glass of water because she’s Webb Hubbell and Crooked Hillary’s coyote ugly offspring‚ plain and simple #HogJaws pic.twitter.com/CR2sezK3P4 — Mike Engleman (@RealHickory) January 29‚ 2023 You do know The National Enquirer tends to get things right more often than the MSM‚ right? Chelsea Clinton would like to wish Webster Hubbell a Happy Father’s Day! pic.twitter.com/GAmBOoOxpR — LivePDDave (@LivePDDave1) June 20‚ 2021 Father’s Day is a tough one for old Chels? Who does Chelsea Clinton buy a Father’s Day gift for… Slick Willie or Webb Hubbell? pic.twitter.com/XSGyO1MIvq — LivePDDave (@LivePDDave1) June 18‚ 2021 Which do you think? Just every time hillary is laying! The real father of Chelsea Clinton is weber hubble but bill Clinton laying #1 laying #2 with Christopher steele dossier laying #4 email probe laying #5 uranium one scandals laying #6 hillary foundation falsification &; the like hillary is layer! pic.twitter.com/7H8xfO5kJ5 — Endeshaw Mekonnen (@EndeshawMekonn1) October 19‚ 2019 The Business Standard has previously reported the following (NOTE: not my take‚ I am quoting the Business Standard): Bill Clinton’s former aide has claimed that the former president had once admitted that Chelsea Clinton is not his biological daughter. According to Larry Nichols‚ the 42nd President of the United States had allegedly said the real father is the former mayor of Little Rock‚ Ark.‚ Webster Hubbell‚ who was once a law partner of his wife Hillary Clinton‚ Radar Online reported. Nichols said that Bill had admitted that he “shoots blanks” after contracting measles as a kid rendered him sterile‚ and added that Hubbell was the real father of his daughter‚ who is currently pregnant with her first child with her husband Marc Mezvinsky. Earlier‚ anti-Clinton blogger Robert Morrow had claimed that Hillary had an affair with Hubbell in 1984 at the Governor’s Mansion during Bill’s second term. RELATED: Anthony Weiner MELTS DOWN When Confronted About The Clinton Kill List! There’s a reason we keep “efforting” Patrick Bet-David to come on my show. Because he will fit right in! We are gonna make it happen eventually‚ you can mark it down… We’re already great friends‚ he just doesn’t know it yet!   Oh I know he’s way bigger than we are‚ but we are cut from the same cloth. I love what he’s doing and I absolutely LOVED his interaction with Anthony Weiner this week. Buckle up‚ this one gets rocky…and it’s oh-so-good! Bet-David never backs down from having controversial guests on his show‚ nor does he only have on people who agree with him. In fact‚ he seems to really enjoy getting diverse viewpoints‚ which is what we’re all supposed to do. Vigorous‚ free and open debate is what made this country great. From the Founding Fathers debating in the Federalist Papers all the way to today‚ it’s the open exchange of ideas and iron-sharpening-iron that produces great results. Not echo chambers… Not censorship… So now back to the interview. So Bet-David has Weiner on his show and proceeds to tell him how he has a reputation of texting teenage girls. Epic. Told him right to his face! And let’s be real folks‚ when your name is literally “Tony Weiner” maybe you want to shy away from sex crimes? I don’t know‚ just seems like that would be good advice. But of course he’s known as the laptop teenage sexting guy — which‚ by the way‚ wasn’t a lot of that criminal? I’m no criminal prosecutor‚ but isn’t it illegal to text teenage girls your Ween-Ween? But I digress. So Bet-David calls him out for his reputation like a boss‚ but that’s not where things fall off the rails. The minute Bet-David starts asking him about the Clinton Kill List‚ Weiner FREAKS out. Goes into complete meltdown mode. You can see he’s visibly shook and viscerally reacting. Bet-David never backs down‚ he sticks to his guns‚ he remains calm and cool and in full control of the interview. I can’t speak for everyone‚ but I walked away thinking Bet-David was rock solid and expressed a question that so many of us are thinking‚ meanwhile Weiner’s meltdown was very suspect. He claimed it was somehow disrespectful to the “victims” although failed to really develop that thought. Look‚ the whole thing is UNPROVEN‚ I will state that right now — we clear? But I will also state this‚ as I have so often said: do YOU know anyone who has had 90+ close friends and/or business associates die under strange circumstances? How about 10? 5? You get my point. And that was Bet-David’s point too. Also‚ why does this “Conspiracy Theory” only pop up around the Clintons? I’m no fan of the Bush family either‚ but there’s no George W. Bush Kill List rumors. No Obama ones either. Why the Clintons? Fair question. ALL fair questions. Yet Weiner freaked. Wouldn’t answer. Watch this amazing clip and then scroll down for details on the “List”. Here you go: You know‚ there’s always the chance that Bet-David and I are just wrong. Just in the minority. So I thought I would open up a poll on Twitter to ask. See if we’re off base? The poll is still live so you can add your vote here if you want: The Clinton Kill List is: — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 21‚ 2023 And here are the results so far: Guess we’re not in the minority according to those results! Now let’s dig into the Clinton Kill List. Let’s start with Wikipedia because Weiner tried to discredit the question by discrediting the source Bet-David was reading from. So here’s (Lefty) Wikipedia covering the topic: Wikipedia calls it a “Conspiracy Theory”. Let me just say this….I’ve lost track of how many “Conspiracy Theories” I’ve looked into that later turn out to be 100% Fact! How about you? But fair enough…. We’re not calling this hard news. Neither was Bet-David. We’re not saying everyone on this list was killed by or at the behest of the Clintons. Of course not! Maybe some were‚ maybe a lot were‚ we don’t know! We’re simply asking why so many people surrounding this couple end up DEAD under mysterious circumstances. Just the worst luck ever? Cursed? Or….? Here’s an update on the list: Updated Clinton Kill List: The List of People “Who Mysteriously Died” After Being Associates With The Clintons [July 2023] From time to time‚ we update this list and now seemed like a good time.   So…let me ask you a question… How many people in your circle of friends or coworkers have turned up mysteriously dead in the course of your LIFETIME?  None?  Maybe one in rare circumstances and you probably tell the story all the time because of how strange it was that it happened to someone you know! In other words‚ have you ever seen Dateline?  Have you ever seen one of those Datelines where the husband has had 2 or 3 wives all die under bizarre circumstances?  Each time they claim it was an accident.  “A million to one shot!”  Terrible tragedy!  Except the investigators start to get REAL suspicious by the time the 2nd and especially 3rd wife dies “accidentally”. Ok‚ now image it happened 47 times!   Or 93! You think that husband isn’t going straight to prison for dozens of consecutive life sentences?  You’d better believe it. And that‚ my friends‚ is [easyazon_link identifier=”1455568899″ locale=”US” tag=”s0d58f-20″]Bill and Hillary Clinton[/easyazon_link].  How many associates of theirs have turned up dead under very bizarre circumstances?  According to ClashDaily.com‚ the list is up to at least 47!  What!?!  And that list of 47 people does not include Seth Rich.  No‚ these are just the close Clinton associates.  Close‚ that is‚ until they wind up dead. Add to that‚ many of these “mysteriously dead” were getting ready to testify against the Clintons for a number of criminal acts.  What a coincidence that they all had such weird “accidents”! Overall the Clinton’s have known close to 100 associates that ended up dead in completely mysterious ways. Here is a list of 47 people who were associated with the Clinton’s that ended up dead according to CBS 6 News… But before I give that list‚ I noticed something interesting when re-researching this story. I noticed the CBS article had been taken down. Gee‚ I wonder why? But thank goodness for a little thing called the Wayback Machine! That’s right‚ Web.Archive.Org has many archived versions of that article and here is a screenshot proving it is legit: The Internet is written in ink‚ even when you’d like to delete it. That‚ my friends‚ is CBS Las Vegas. So Patrick‚ the next time Anthony Weiner wants to try and discredit your source‚ ask him what he thinks of CBS! From that article‚ here it is: 1- James McDougal – Clintons convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack‚ while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation. 2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder …happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House. 3 – Vince Foster – Former White House counselor‚ and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of mutiple gunshot wounds to the head‚  but still ruled a suicide. 4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated‚ and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the Air Traffic controller committed suicide. 5 – C. Victor Raiser‚ II – Raiser‚ a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992. 6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock ‚ September 1992. Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted advisor.” 7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser‚ found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events. 8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock .. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house. 9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas 10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater. 11- Kathy Ferguson‚ ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson‚ was found dead in May 1994‚ in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases‚ as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones. 12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee‚ he was found dead in June‚ 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee. 13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater‚ died by jumping out a window of a tall building January‚ 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor. 14 – Florence Martin – Accountant &; sub-contractor for the CIA‚ was related to the Barry Seal Mena Airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds. 15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head‚ ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death. If you got this far things get stranger. The Clinton’s have had 12 bodyguards that ended up dead after being hired. They are the following also according to that same CBS article: 16. Todd McKeehan 17. Steve Willis 18. Sgt. Tim Sabel 19.  Captain Scott J . Reynolds 20. Conway LeBleu 21. Robert Williams 22. Major William S. Barkley‚ Jr. 23. Spec. Gary Rhodes 24. Sgt. Brian Hanley 25. Col. William Densberger 26. Major General William Robertson 27. Col. Robert Kelly It doesn’t end there though. Six people died after being a witness or suspect for the Ives/Henry Case(Two boys who were hit by a train in Arkansas but when an autopsy came out it was revealed  that they were murdered before the train hit them‚ it was a major case in Arkansas at the time and Bill Clinton was then the governor. The place where the boys were murdered is believed to be a major drug trafficking hub that was protected by Clinton while he was Governor.) They are the following: 28. Gregory Collins: Died in 1989 by a gunshot wound 29. Richard Winters: Who was a suspect in the Ives/Henry Case died by a set-up. 30.Keith Coney: Died in an accident. 31. Jeff Rhodes: Was shot and the body was fan burned in a trash can. 32. Keith McMaskle: Was stabbed over 100 times. 33.James Milan: Found decapitated. We are not done yet. Clash Daily put out a list for the rest… And interestingly‚ the ClashDaily article has also been taken down! Here is the Web Archive version: https://web.archive.org/web/20201108130650/https://clashdaily.com/2016/07/hilarious-guns-dont-kill-people-clintons-kill-people/ Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9‚ 1992. She died in a one car accident. Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists‚ apparently‚ in the middle of his investigation. Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22‚ 1993 in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno three weeks before his death Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington‚ Virginia apartment balcony August15‚ 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guarantee scandal. Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29‚ 1996. Her bruised‚ nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce. Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance‚ died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash. Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee‚ died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard‚ in addition to serving on Clinton’s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother‚ stepfather and brother. Barry Seal – Drug running pilot out of Mena‚ Arkansas‚ death was no accident. Johnny Lawhorn Jr. – Mechanic‚ found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole. Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guarantee. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released. Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fund raiser died March 1‚ 1994 when his plane exploded. 47. Jeffery Epstein: Epstein who was charged with child sex trafficking and was awaiting trial died by “hanging himself” which is very hard to believe. Most believe he was taken out and evidence backs this theory up. Bill Clinton had close ties with Epstein and even visited his island where he took underage girls to be sex slaves. 48.Seth Rich: A DNC committee member who was murdered after receiving two gunshot wounds to the back. Rich’s death was claimed to be a result of an attempted robbery‚ but that doesn’t seem possible being his wallet was never touched. 49.Klaus Eberwein: Was a former Haitian government official that was found dead in his room from a gunshot wound in the head. Eberwein was supposed to appear before the Haiti Ethics and Anti Corruption Commission where many speculated he was going to call out the Clinton Foundation for misusing donations for earthquake victims. 50-84. People on Flight with Ron Brown: We covered Ron Brown earlier on the list but left out the 34 others that were on the flight with him. To recap Ron Brown was the United States Secretary of Commerce during the first term of President Bill Clinton.  Brown and 34 others died in a plane crash in Croatia. The strange part about the rash was both Brown’s autopsy show he had a major wound to his head that looked to be from a gunshot. The navigation chief at the Croatian airport responsible for the GPS location of Brown’s plan was found dead with a bullet hole through his chest just before he was going to be interviewed by the Air Force. Brown has a lot of inside knowledge on Clinton’s dirty dealing in Croatia and in Asia‚ maybe he‚ unfortunately‚ knew too much which ultimately led to his assignation. 85-89. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens‚ Information Officer Sean Smith‚ and  CIA operatives‚ Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods: These four men died under the eye of Hillary Clinton. Both Smith and Woods filed a lawsuit against Hillary Clinton for wrongful death and defamation. The lawsuit even stated that  Hillary’s use of a private email server contributed to their sons’ death.  But honestly….”what difference does it make at this point?” right HillRod? 90. Beranton Whisenaut: was a young Federal prosecutor that was found was up on a beach in Florida. Many believe he was murdered because of his role in an investigation involving former DNC head and current South Florida congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz who was a known affiliate of Hillary Clinton. 91-93. JFK Jr. and his wife and Sister-in-law: Like many on this list mysteriously died in a plane crash. So‚ how is JFK Jr’s death tied to the Clinton’s? Let’s take a look when Daniel Moynihan announced he was retiring his Senate seat representing New York‚ John F Kennedy Jr. expressed interest in claiming the seat. JFK Jr. wasn’t the only person interested in the seat Hillary Clinton knew Bill’s time in office would come to an end and the Lewinksy scandal coming to light Hillary wanted to have a political career of her own. On July 6th Clinton filed her paperwork with the Federal Election Committee to officially run for the open Senate seat. Just 10 days later on July 16‚ 1999‚ Kennedy’s plane went crashing in Massachusetts. With the Clinton’s past of several associates dying in plane crashes and then all of the sudden the man who would absolutely destroy Hillary in the polls mysteriously dies in a plane crash it definitely raises eyebrows. Many believe JFK Jr. didn’t die in the crash and believe he is looking to make a return back to the political scene very soon and expose the deep state once and for all. This concludes the HIGHLY CONSPIRATORIAL () “Clinton Kill List”. More reference here: https://legacyfirearmsco.com/news/the-list-of-clinton-associates-who-died-mysteriously-check-it-out/ I’m sure they’re more names to add to the list being Hillary and Bill are both highly connected to the CIA and other deep state operatives but these are the names that are highly reported of and have a clear connection to the Clinton’s or their Foundation. Did the Clintons kill them or have them killed? I’m not saying that.  I would never say that. I’m just saying I don’t personally have 93 friends or close associates who all died under mysterious circumstances or “committed suicide” and I bet you don’t either! Heck‚ I don’t even have FIVE‚ or even ONE or TWO! Do you? Enough said. Draw your own conclusions. So…did we miss any? If you have any to add‚ drop a comment below… [May 21‚ 2022: we are hopeful Elon Musk is not soon added to this list. Stay safe Elon!] https://welovetrump.com/2022/05/21/elon-musk-sets-his-sights-on-hillary-clinton-the-clinton-campaign-hoax/

A Transportation Security Administration (TSA) official was arrested last week on an outstanding warrant. “TSA Assistant Federal Security Director Maxine McManaman was arrested in Atlanta by U.S. Customs and Border Protection‚” Fox News reports. The St. Lucie County (Florida) Sheriff’s Office had a warrant for her arrest for allegedly working with an accomplice‚ Delroy Chambers Sr.‚ to exploit a relative with dementia by falsifying documents in their name. TSA official accused of exploiting a family member with #dementia is arrested https://t.co/k3Sl9aqSUt by @minyvonneb @nbcnews via @BrauneisAmy #Alzheimers #abuse — Ian Kremer (@LEAD_Coalition) January 5‚ 2024 Fox News reports: The Florida authorities allege that the duo forged signatures on a quitclaim deed transferring ownership of a property in the relative’s name over to themselves. The relative whose property was transferred to McManaman and Chambers allegedly could not have signed the quitclaim deed‚ because the individual was found to have been in Atlanta on the date listed‚ according to police. Chambers was previously arrested on Dec. 20 in Port St. Lucie‚ charged with two counts of exploitation of an elderly or disabled adult‚ simple neglect and two counts of forgery. He eventually bonded out of jail. McManaman is facing a third-degree felony charge of forgery. She was reportedly apprehended after touching down in Atlanta on an international flight. Top TSA official busted for alleged “exploitation of a family member with dementia.” ⁦@DHSgov⁩ https://t.co/dvlPeFV9pw — J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) January 5‚ 2024 Per NBC News: McManaman is currently detained at the Clayton County Jail in Georgia awaiting extradition to St. Lucie County. In a redacted probable cause statement‚ she told authorities during a recorded call that her brother has made these allegations multiple times. TSA said it is aware of McManaman’s arrest “for a non-work related charge” and he is on leave pending further law enforcement action. “TSA holds its employees to the highest professional and ethical standards and has no tolerance for misconduct on or off-duty. Any employee who fails to meet our fundamental ethical standards is held accountable‚” a spokesperson said Friday.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to take the case on whether Donald Trump could be deemed ineligible to run for president because of the ‘insurrection clause’ in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The high court will rule on the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump from the state’s Republican primary ballot. Oral arguments will begin on February 8th. JUST IN: The US Supreme Court will take up the case of President Trump being removed from the ballot in Colorado and Maine. Oral arguments will begin on February 8. Their decision will determine whether or not states can remove President Trump from the ballot over Section 4… pic.twitter.com/yIdjsWOnfj — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) January 5‚ 2024 “The brief order said the case would be argued on an accelerated schedule on Feb. 8‚ indicating that a ruling will follow soon after‚” NBC News reports. BREAKING: The Supreme Court agrees to weigh whether Trump can be kicked off Colorado’s Republican primary ballot. — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) January 5‚ 2024 Per NBC News: If the Supreme Court rules for Trump‚ then he would stay on the ballot. But should the court uphold the Colorado ruling‚ then other states could be encouraged to follow suit. There is also the possibility that if Trump is kicked off the ballot‚ Republicans could take retaliatory action by doing the same to President Joe Biden. Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has already floated such a move. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Dec. 19 that Trump was ineligible to appear on the Republican primary ballot in the state‚ although it put the ruling on hold to allow for appeals of its decision. In the meantime‚ Maine’s top election official reached a similar conclusion‚ further heightening the stakes. Unless the Supreme Court acts quickly‚ any decision could have limited impact during the primaries‚ but the logic would likely apply to the general election as well. The Colorado Supreme Court based its ruling on language in the Constitution’s 14th Amendment that prohibits those who “engaged in insurrection” from running for various federal offices. Among the novel legal questions presented by the case are whether the language applies to candidates for president and who gets to decide whether someone engaged in an insurrection. “Trump is separately appealing to state court a ruling by Maine’s Democratic secretary of state‚ Shenna Bellows‚ that he was ineligible to appear on that state’s ballot over his role in the Capitol attack‚” the Associated Press writes. The appeal of the Colorado ruling will be the most significant moving forward. The Supreme Court has never ruled on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment‚ adopted in 1868 to prevent Confederates from regaining their former government posts. Whatever the high court decides for Colorado will apply to the other 49 states. Both rulings are on hold until the appeals conclude. From the Associated Press: The high court’s decision to intervene‚ which both sides called for‚ is the most direct involvement in a presidential election since Bush v. Gore in 2000‚ when a conservative majority effectively decided the election for Republican George W. Bush. Only Justice Clarence Thomas remains from that court. Three of the nine Supreme Court justices were appointed by Trump‚ though they have repeatedly ruled against him in 2020 election-related lawsuits‚ as well as his efforts to keep documents related to Jan. 6 and his tax returns from being turned over to congressional committees. At the same time‚ Justices Amy Coney Barrett‚ Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have been in the majority of conservative-driven decisions that overturned the five-decade-old constitutional right to abortion‚ expanded gun rights and struck down affirmative action in college admissions. Some Democratic lawmakers have called on Thomas to step aside from the case because of his wife’s support for Trump’s effort to overturn the results of the election‚ which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden. Thomas is unlikely to agree. He has recused himself from only one other case related to the 2020 election‚ involving former law clerk John Eastman‚ and so far the people trying to disqualify Trump haven’t asked him to recuse.

French scientists have warned that babies are who receive RSV vaccines are dropping dead in unprecedented numbers. The researchers identified alarming safety signals in babies coinciding with the rollout of Beyfortus‚ a recently approved monoclonal [...] The post French Scientists Warn Newborns Who Receive RSV Shots Are Dropping Dead appeared first on The People's Voice.