YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Let's Get Cooking
Let's Get Cooking
34 w

Little Debbie Is Selling Nostalgic Candles Inspired By All Your Favorite Treats
Favicon 
www.thekitchn.com

Little Debbie Is Selling Nostalgic Candles Inspired By All Your Favorite Treats

“Can’t wait to get them!” one shopper wrote. READ MORE...
Like
Comment
Share
Country Roundup
Country Roundup
34 w

Zach Bryan's Ex Says He Once Flew Into a Rage Over Morgan Wallen
Favicon 
tasteofcountry.com

Zach Bryan's Ex Says He Once Flew Into a Rage Over Morgan Wallen

In an explosive new episode of her podcast, Brianna Chickenfry says Bryan was emotionally abusive and didn't allow her to listen to certain music. Continue reading…
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
34 w ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Royce Gracie: America is The Greatest Country in The World. Link in bio.
Like
Comment
Share
The People's Voice Feed
The People's Voice Feed
34 w

Almost 1,000 People A Day Diagnosed With Cancer As Cases In England Hit Record High
Favicon 
thepeoplesvoice.tv

Almost 1,000 People A Day Diagnosed With Cancer As Cases In England Hit Record High

Cancer cases in England have hit a record high, with almost 1,000 people a day diagnosed, according to recent NHS figures. There were 346,217 diagnoses throughout 2022, 5 per cent higher than the 329,664 recorded [...] The post Almost 1,000 People A Day Diagnosed With Cancer As Cases In England Hit Record High appeared first on The People's Voice.
Like
Comment
Share
Independent Sentinel News Feed
Independent Sentinel News Feed
34 w

Election Results Map 2024: The House Is Going to the GOP
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

Election Results Map 2024: The House Is Going to the GOP

The Fate of the US House Republicans have a great advantage in winning the House. “If all goes as expected, the GOP will win 221 to 214.” “Former political pollster Adam Carlson wrote on X: Based on race calls from AP & DDHQ (plus a candidate concession), here’s where the House stands: “Republican: 216 (+2 […] The post Election Results Map 2024: The House Is Going to the GOP appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.
Like
Comment
Share
BlabberBuzz Feed
BlabberBuzz Feed
34 w

Iran Furious Over "Absurd” DOJ Claim: The Inside Scoop On The Alleged Trump Plot
Favicon 
www.blabber.buzz

Iran Furious Over "Absurd” DOJ Claim: The Inside Scoop On The Alleged Trump Plot

Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
34 w

‘Embarrassment To Science’: Scientific American Editor Blasted For Ripping Trump Voters
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

‘Embarrassment To Science’: Scientific American Editor Blasted For Ripping Trump Voters

The editor-in-chief of Scientific American, the nation’s oldest continuously-published magazine, has come under harsh criticism for her politically-charged comments in the wake of President-elect Donald Trump’s victory on Tuesday. Laura Helmuth, who has led the publication since April 2020 took to her personal Bluesky account to air her grievances in since-deleted posts. Any advice for what workplaces can do to help people who are devastated by the election? Thanks so much. I apologize to younger voters that my Gen X is so full of f***ing fascists. Solidarity to everybody whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted high-school classmates are celebrating early results because f*** them to the moon and back. Every four years I remember why I left Indiana (where I grew up) and remember why I respect the people who stayed and are trying to make it less racist and sexist. The Moral arc of the universe isn’t going to bend itself. TRIGGERED: Read these posts by Laura Helmuth the Editor-in-Chief of Scientific American. These are the 'experts' we're supposed to trust? h/t @TheRabbitHole84 pic.twitter.com/dcJcry5eeh — @amuse (@amuse) November 6, 2024 Historian Michael Shermer took Helmuth to task, writing, “I wrote a monthly column for Scientific American for 18 years and could not have been prouder to have been part of that 150-year old standard bearer of science and the search for truth. Those days are gone. @sciam is now a shill for far left woke progressives.” I wrote a monthly column for Scientific American for 18 years and could not have been prouder to have been part of that 150-year old standard bearer of science and the search for truth. Those days are gone. @sciam is now a shill for far left woke progressives. Here is the EIC: pic.twitter.com/1renJW1TZe — Michael Shermer (@michaelshermer) November 7, 2024 Other figures have also criticized Helmuth, who previously served as The Washington Post’s editor of Health, Science and Environment. Scientific American editor-in-chief is an embarrassment to science. Get politics out of science, engineering, STEM education. Science and engineering is about building cool shit, and exploring the mysteries of physics, chemistry, biology, etc. — Lex Fridman (@lexfridman) November 8, 2024 The problem is that she places political activism above science https://t.co/ANsmLdmfEG — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 8, 2024 Scientific American editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth has issued an apology, expressing a commitment to "editorial objectivity". Anyone who has observed the far-left politicization of @sciam's reporting over the last several years knows her words ring hollow. Laura Helmuth must go. pic.twitter.com/8sRVSL0VVs — Kevin Bass PhD MS (@kevinnbass) November 7, 2024 Roughly three weeks before the 2024 election, Scientific American published a piece claiming “Former president Donald Trump, in his inimitable way, has done at least one service to the cause of honesty. In his blundering ramblings, he regularly exposes the racism, and its science-flavored pseudoscientific companion, eugenics, that still wounds America.” In November 2023, Scientific American published an article which stated, “Inequity between male and female athletes is a result not of inherent biological differences between the sexes but of biases in how they are treated in sports.” Laura Helmuth has to go. As an editor, it's her job to not let Scientific American become ideological and unscientitic. And she has utterly failed. Here are three examples: 1. Men and women would run equally fast, if it wasn't for biases in how they are treated in sports. 2.… https://t.co/yUvFvcqkqJ pic.twitter.com/1nhCK2rHBk — Jonatan Pallesen (@jonatanpallesen) November 8, 2024 On November 7, Helmuth issued an apology on her website, writing: I made a series of offensive and inappropriate posts on my personal Bluesky account on election night, and I am sorry. I respect and value people across the political spectrum. These posts, which I have deleted, do not reflect my beliefs; they were a mistaken expression of shock and confusion about the election results. These posts of course do not reflect the position of Scientific American or my colleagues. I am committed to civil communication and editorial objectivity. Helmuth is not the only editor working at a scientific publication to express their political views. In August 2023, Holden Thorp, editor-in-chief of the Science family of journals, who just been hired as a professor at George Washington University, stated, “The @NRA and everyone who supports them should burn in hell.” His tweet followed a shooting at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which he had previously attended. Science Editor-in-Chief Holden Thorp exhibits partisanship, identitarian idiocy, and indifference to truth on levels at least equal to Scientific American Editor-in-Chief Laura Helmuth. At a journal almost infinitely more important and impactful than Helmuth's. pic.twitter.com/U2sTWNnZ0i — Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) November 8, 2024
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
34 w

FLASHBACK: Media (Wrongly!) Claimed GA Law Would ‘Restrict’ Voting
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

FLASHBACK: Media (Wrongly!) Claimed GA Law Would ‘Restrict’ Voting

Preliminary numbers show a record 5.29 million Georgia voters cast their ballots in the 2024 presidential election on Tuesday, an increase of at least 290,000 from the 4.99 million who voted four years ago. Just three years ago, the liberal media trumpeted how a new Georgia law was an effort to “make it harder to vote,” to “restrict voting rights” or amounted to “voter suppression.” There’s no way to reconcile a significant increase in voter turnout with media claims that Georgia Republicans had rigged the system to “suppress” voter turnout. That doesn’t mean you’ll hear a lot of apologies from journalists who got it wrong in 2021, even though the record shows their coverage consisted of credulously repeating Democratic talking points that turned out to have no basis in reality. “The Georgia Senate on Tuesday pushed through the first batch of what could be a raft of restrictive voting measures,” warned the Associated Press in a February 23, 2021 story. “Rolling back voter rights,” CBS anchor Norah O’Donnell proclaimed on the March 1 Evening News, blaming “the Republican push in more than 40 states to limit voting access.” “Why do you [Republicans] bring back the most odious laws suppressing the black vote, almost by design, since Jim Crow?” CNN’s Chris Cuomo sneered on his Cuomo Prime Time on March 15. “This is becoming some kind of perverse holy war for you guys.” “What we’re seeing the Republican Party do now is actually go back to the norm of voting behavior, the norm of American voter suppression,” MSNBC contributor Jason Johnson alleged three days later on MSNBC’s Deadline: White House. “We have to stop these people at every single turn because they will take America back to the 1930s, ’40s, and ’20s, and make sure that nobody who’s not a straight white male Christian is actually able to vote and exercise their right in this country.” The final bill was passed by the Georgia House of Representatives on March 25, 2021 and signed into law by Governor Brian Kemp. “This is the most serious thing that we’ve seen since the January 6 siege,” MSNBC host Joy Reid fretted that night. “It’s Jim Crow America!” “Make no mistake about it. This bill is about nothing less than taking away the right to vote. That is all it is, plain and simple. A right that generations of Americans fought and died for,” Don Lemon insisted on CNN Tonight. “The bill the governor signed tonight is a slap in the face to John Lewis, who gave his life, who risked his life for the right to vote....And tonight Governor Kemp is taking away that right from the people he was elected to serve.” The next morning on NBC’s Today, White House correspondent Kristen Welker matter-of-factly referred to “Republicans...attempting to limit voting rights,” as if that was a neutral description of the bill, rather than an outrageous Democratic accusation. CBS This Morning brought aboard their in-house “election law expert” Dave Becker, who challenged the premise of the Georgia law: “It’s important to note first that all of these efforts in the states like Georgia are based on the Big Lie, based on the lie that the election lacked integrity, when in fact this was the most secure and transparent election we’ve had....President Biden was absolutely right yesterday when he called the effort ‘anti-American.’” On CNN, daytime anchor Brianna Keilar insisted: “We are watching the Big Lie turn into voter suppression before our very eyes.” On MSNBC’s The ReidOut, frequent guest Michael Eric Dyson raged: “This is Jim Crow, this is Jane Crow, this is their kids, this is the nesting of white supremacy....The real religion, the real politics in America is whiteness and whiteness unhinged.” He faced no challenge from host Joy Reid, who chose to nod along: “That is sad but true. Sad but true.” That Sunday (March 28) on ABC’s Good Morning America, co-host Dan Harris asked reporter Jon Karl about “the situation we’re seeing in Georgia with these voting restrictions,” as if anyone’s vote was being restricted. Karl charged that “Republicans... are looking at ways across the country... to make it essentially harder to vote, to bring down voter turnout.” The next day on Nightly News, anchor Lester Holt casually described it as “Georgia’s new law restricting voting rights.” The next morning, MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski branded it “Georgia’s crackdown at the ballot box.” In the Washington Post, columnist Greg Sargent claimed that Georgia’s law and others were part of “a huge wave of voter suppression efforts.” On MSNBC, Joy Reid called it “Georgia’s Jim Crow voter suppression law.” “This is what the Republican party is now. It’s not a party of ideas or reasonable debate. It exists to play up fears and push ideas of right-wing victimhood,” growled fill-in host Mehdi Hasan on MSNBC’s All In on March 30. “Take for instance that new Georgia voting law which will hit black people disproportionately hard....” All across the dial, the media mantra was the same: voting rights were being slashed. “As Republicans in dozens of states seek new limits on how people can vote...” CBS’s Gayle King misinformed viewers on CBS This Morning on March 31. That same day on CNN, anchor Ana Cabrera referred to how Georgia’s “Governor Kemp was signing sweeping voting restrictions into law...” “Jim Crow is making a comeback,” CNN reporter Joe Johns intoned in a taped piece for CNN Tonight that evening. “As hundreds of new proposals to scale back voter participation in elections make their way through state legislatures, the parallels with the past are inescapable....And some of those proposals have already become law, like the one in Georgia.” “Governor Brian Kemp says there’s nothing Jim Crow about this law,” MSNBC’s Ali Velshi asked the Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson on The 11th Hour on April 7. “What’s your take on whether it is, or isn’t?” “Well, I say it is, and, I mean, I did grow up under Jim Crow laws,” Robinson argued. “If this is not a complete and total verbatim repeat of that, it is certainly a very close rhyme.” The idea that the law made voting more difficult for blacks in Georgia is refuted by the data. In 2020, exit polls showed 29% of Georgia’s voters identified themselves as black; this week, that number actually, rose to 30% of those who cast ballots. That suggests that while overall turnout as a whole increased, black turnout increased even more. And the notion that the Republican law had damaged the Democratic turnout machine is also not true. Vice President Kamala Harris actually received nearly 70,000 more votes this year (2,544,281, as of 9am on Sunday, November 10) than President Biden received in 2020 (2,474,507) when he won the state. But while Democratic turnout increased, Republican turnout increased even more, as Donald Trump improved from 2.46 million votes four years ago to 2.66 million this year, an increase of roughly 200,000. Three years ago, the media claimed Georgia’s votes would “restricted” or “suppressed” by Republicans in a racist fashion. None of that happened. In 2024, Democrats just got out-voted in Georgia, plain and simple — and a lot of other states as well. For more examples from our flashback series, which we call the NewsBusters Time Machine, go here.  
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
34 w

Abercrombie & Filth: Inside a predator’s playground
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Abercrombie & Filth: Inside a predator’s playground

Some predators hide in plain sight, shocking those around them when their crimes are finally revealed. Others give off subtle — and not-so-subtle — clues that something is deeply amiss. Former Abercrombie & Fitch CEO Mike Jeffries, arrested on sex trafficking and interstate prostitution charges last week, falls squarely in the latter category.Victims were reportedly subjected to horrific experiences, including being injected with liquid Viagra by men dressed in Abercrombie uniforms. During his time at the helm of the iconic American brand, Jeffries pursued a relentlessly hyper-sexualized marketing strategy built around homoerotic imagery and a cult-like worship of half-naked teens. As this fetishization of youthful innocence intensified, Jeffries' face — like a reversal of Oscar Wilde's "The Picture of Dorian Gray" — seemed to bear witness to his depravity. A nightmarish regimen of fillers and plastic surgery turned the blandly handsome executive into a grotesque parody of the ideal Abercrombie customer. As one Reddit wag put it, "He looks like he was bobbing for apples in a bucket of bees." Epstein reduxThe revelations surrounding Jeffries mirror the monstrous abuses of Jeffrey Epstein, with the former CEO reportedly using his power to orchestrate a calculated pattern of sexual exploitation. Like Epstein, Jeffries also had a private jet.The indictment paints a grim picture. Specifically, an international sex trafficking ring as part of which Abercrombie’s brand was weaponized to lure and trap vulnerable young men, exploiting their ambitions with false promises of professional opportunities. From 2008 to 2015, Jeffries, along with his partner Matthew Smith and employee James Jacobson, allegedly ran this operation with impunity all while exerting tight control over the company.This was both a full-time operation and a depraved hobby.Final saleWitness accounts and legal filings describe a sordid quest for sexual gratification, with Jeffries and Smith luring young men with lavish trips to luxurious destinations in Europe, the Hamptons, and Morocco.Once there, theses victims were reportedly subjected to horrific experiences, including being injected with liquid Viagra by men dressed in Abercrombie uniforms — agents of Jeffries who served more as enforcers than employees. One Los Angeles man recounted being coerced into Jeffries’ hotel suite and enduring unwanted sexual advances that escalated to forced acts despite his repeated attempts to say no.Jeffries headed Abercrombie from 1992 until 2014, turning it into one of the most successful clothing brands of the new millennium and generating massive profits for the company. Given the brazenness of Jeffries alleged behavior, the frantic efforts of current Abercrombie leadership to distance themselves from the scandal ring hollow. It’s delusional to think Jeffries and his accomplices acted completely under the radar. His predatory actions were fueled by a culture of silence, sustained by a network of enablers who willfully ignored the abuse. As in Epstein's case, powerful people could have intervened and stopped the abuse. They simply chose not to.J CruelJeffries’ control of Abercrombie extended far beyond the brand’s image. That he even dictated the attire and behavior of his private jet staff reveals a tyrant detached from reality, consumed by his own twisted desires. Jeffries' dictatorial rule went unchallenged for years — and no doubt would've continued had he continued to deliver. His downfall was not the result of a reckoning for his crimes but a response to declining sales and changing cultural attitudes that made his vision unsustainable. But the issue, I suggest, goes far beyond Jeffries himself. This is a story of a brand culture that fostered tyranny and silenced dissent, one that thrived on reducing people to their body fat percentages. Abercrombie’s entire aesthetic — a fixation on youth, beauty, and chiseled abs — was built on a foundation of control and exploitation. The implications of this culture are not isolated to one corrupt CEO but extend to an entire industry, where the commodification of innocence creates an environment ripe for abuse.More precisely, the abuse of children.Bait and FitchA recent Stop The Traffik report highlights the broader reality of the modeling industry, where hopes and dreams are weaponized by traffickers and predators. In countries like Colombia, Ethiopia, and Russia, assurances of a glamorous lifestyle are used to bait young, impoverished individuals into exploitative situations. Promises of modeling careers quickly become coercive, trapping victims in cycles of manipulation and sexual exploitation. The entire industry is run by multi-millionaires and billionaires, people with their own private security and private islands. People who, on the whole, play by a very different set of rules. Or no rules at all.Dirty laundryAs we reflect on Abercrombie & Fitch’s dark legacy of sexualizing teens, it’s vital to remember that this culture was crafted by an immoral predator. Naturally, the company hopes you’ll forget. In fact, it’s banking on it.Rather incredibly, retail analysts suggest the brand's campaign to memory hole its sleazy past is working. Newer customers are too young to remember while older ones seem to have accepted Abercrombie's reinvention into something more muted and mature. But no amount of rebranding can erase the reality that Abercrombie didn’t just enable Mike Jeffries — it rewarded him handsomely. It wasn’t merely a matter of giving a platform to a possible psychopath (and I don’t use that term lightly); Abercrombie empowered and enriched him while turning a blind eye to his behavior. For all its attempts to exorcise the memory of Jeffries, the company will forever be tied to a man whose degeneracy nearly destroyed it. The exploitation of kids wasn’t an accident — it was the business model. Jeffries was the architect, and Abercrombie was his enabler.And that’s a legacy you can’t wash away.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
34 w

God never makes someone LGBTQ+: The 5 biggest victims of the rainbow agenda
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

God never makes someone LGBTQ+: The 5 biggest victims of the rainbow agenda

I’ve spent the last few days walking the streets and alleys of one of my favorite small rural villages in the Northwest. The coffee, the flowers, the food, the views, everything is made so beautiful by the hearts and hands of these local artists. Perhaps the only things more ubiquitous than the thoughtful touches of creativity are the LGBTQ+ pride flags and signs proclaiming things like “everyone is loved here” and "this is a safe place." Really? Is everyone loved? Is everyone made more safe?Amid all of this beauty, I find these messages strangely dissonant. Why? Because these signs aren’t loving to everyone, and they make some safe and others less safe. But the other side of these well-meaning messages is hidden. So we need to spotlight those being excluded and often injured by the ideology these messages are promoting. Pointing this out is important because the reason for the boldness with which shop owners and churches fly these flags betrays the fact they either don’t know or don’t care about the cruelty their “kindness” perpetrates on other parties. Here are the five parties you choose to injure by flying your Pride flags. ChildrenCelebrating LGBTQ+ pride is the practice of acting compassionate to some children while being cruel to others. Children are hurt more than any other party by a culture that champions individual identities over family identities. Flying these flags is a signal that the movement that says your sexuality is the place from which you form your deepest identity is deeply anti-family. The United States has now surpassed Sweden as the country with more single-parent households than any country in the world. The other thing that the U.S. and Sweden have in common (along with all the other top countries where family bonds dissolve most frequently) is these places are where hyper-individualism is being most aggressively embraced. Stop disrespecting the gift of life given to you by your ancestors and celebrate continuing your family line — not ending it. Children growing up without both a mother and father are at an enormous disadvantage. But even researchers who have most documented this fact refuse to draw the obvious connection between hyper-individualism and the refusal to create a culture that encourages children to find their identity in their family over their sexuality. A culture championing hedonistic sexuality and the primacy of sexual identity may seem momentarily safer for someone wishing to explore alternative sexual identities. But it is decidedly neither safer nor more loving for countless millions of children affected by the weakening of the family that is the inevitable result. Your ancestorsEvery person you meet is part of a family line so resilient, so resourceful, so powerful that it stretches back unbroken to the very beginning of the human race. Did thousands of your ancestors persevere through countless unremembered sacrifices in order for their descendants — at a time when we enjoy more peace and safety than they could ever have dreamed — to choose to end their family lines forever? This alone is reason not to be proud of LGBTQ+ identities. Challenges like same-sex attraction make the tragedy of ending a resilient family line more likely, but this is not something to celebrate. Stop disrespecting the gift of life given to you by your ancestors and celebrate continuing your family line — not ending it. Your descendantsMuch of our suffering is caused by our shortsighted forefathers, and we return the favor by ignoring how our decisions impact our descendants. Break this cycle in your generation. I once read that when a Jewish child dies before having children, the family mourns not only the loss of that child but the 10,000 descendants of that child who now will never be born. This, of course, is true at the death of any child. But today, instead of mourning the loss of descendants, we celebrate identities that make cutting off a person’s future descendants some kind of accomplishment. The covenant of marriage “It’s just a piece of paper …” No, a wedding is an act of covenant-making before God. This is a brilliant idea that gives stability to entire civilizations. We diminish its significance at our own peril. The reason for the narrow sexual ethic in Scripture is to create a culture that promotes multigenerational families. One man and one woman for life is the only sexual ethic worth celebrating. The reason we throw a party when a couple has stayed faithfully married for 50 years is that something remarkable has been genuinely accomplished, not just for that couple or for that couple’s family, but for society as a whole. Now that’s a flag worth flying. The next time you see a business or church proclaiming their compassion, understand the real trade-off of cruelty they are celebrating as well. Instead, today, we celebrate the bravery of people publicly championing their desires at the expense of others. Our culture refuses to face the fact that every time we loosen the biblical sexual ethic, we weaken the marriage covenant at the core of the family for future generations, and our grandchildren will pay the price. The marriage covenant has never been weaker, starting with no-fault divorce and culminating in the redefinition of marriage to include alternative arrangements. We don’t see the cultural cruelty being unleashed by our supposed compassion because it launches a slow-moving disease that will be most fully experienced by those not yet born. God “As followers of Jesus, our allegiance is to the King, and His kingdom is our priority. Submitting to Christ as King is an act of worship.” —Bailey Gillespie Last but not least: Any follower of Jesus believes that this world was designed for a purpose by an all-knowing, all-loving God. These flags have become a growing symbol of conquest. They represent an alternate kingdom. They say, “We have dethroned Jesus and now worship the idol of self.” God never makes someone LGBTQ+ — this is a false identity category created by a culture determined to free itself from the purpose behind its design. Yes, some struggle more than others to live in the design of the Creator, but we don’t celebrate the decision to give in to the wrong side of that struggle. We should have genuine compassion for these challenges without encouraging a lifestyle of sin along with all of the inevitable consequences that result. So the next time you see a business or church proclaiming their "compassion," understand the real trade-off of cruelty they are celebrating as well. We become what we celebrate, and today it takes wisdom and courage to stand up to the collective blindness to injuries and corruption being unleashed by this ideology. This essay was adapted from an article originally published at Jeremy Pryor's Substack.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 4590 out of 56666
  • 4586
  • 4587
  • 4588
  • 4589
  • 4590
  • 4591
  • 4592
  • 4593
  • 4594
  • 4595
  • 4596
  • 4597
  • 4598
  • 4599
  • 4600
  • 4601
  • 4602
  • 4603
  • 4604
  • 4605

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund