YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
36 w

Nessie Strikes Back: The Loch Ness Horror (2023)
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Nessie Strikes Back: The Loch Ness Horror (2023)

Column SFF Bestiary Nessie Strikes Back: The Loch Ness Horror (2023) A little creative license and a decent effects budget… By Judith Tarr | Published on October 28, 2024 Comment 0 Share New Share It’s the most wonderful time of the year. Ghosts are walking, portals are opening. Everyone’s free to be scary. How better to celebrate the season than a good, bad monster movie? After all, it’s the Loch Ness Monster. She just needs a little creative license and a decent effects budget. The Loch Ness Horror is surprisingly not awful. I don’t recognize anyone in the cast, but they do their jobs competently. There’s a little gore but not too much, and the screaming keeps down to a reasonable level. The plot even makes sense, more or less, and there’s quite a nice twist toward the end. It opens with a research sub hunting something at sea. The man and woman on board seem kind of paramilitary, with space-station-like uniforms and lots and lots of buttons and gadgets. We learn that what they’re hunting is female; she’s escaped her loch and is headed out to sea. They’re trying to find her and take her back. She finds them first. She’s a gigantic aquatic reptile with a blobby body, shortish flippers, a long neck, and a truly incredible number of very, very sharp teeth. Those teeth close on the sub, with screaming and cries for help. Fade to a boardroom full of actors who look remarkably like a gang of villains from a Superman movie. The research sub is missing. The woman in charge wants it found. New scene. New set of actors. These look a little less villainous and a little more hero-like. They’re boarding a very techie-looking yacht whose captain and his henchman and henchwoman could be understudies for Zod and his minions. Stalwart Bryce and tough, smart Lara are here to head the rescue mission, along with diver Willow, nebulously qualified redhead Ava, and Drake, who gets seasick. All too soon they learn it’s not a rescue mission, it’s a hunt. The sub and its crew are gone. They’re taking over its mission: to find the monster and bring her back, presumably to Loch Ness. Nessie has other plans. While the humans bicker and squabble and wave guns at each other, she closes in on the boat. Willow goes down in a cage to look for the wreckage and, not incidentally, the monster. Henchman Travis follows in what he calls the pod—a small sub. The rescue team and the boat’s crew are not getting along. But they have worse problems than guns and arguments. Nessie is a good deal bigger than the boat, and she’s hungry. She starts picking people off, starting with Willow in the cage and Drake on the boat. Then the weather goes bad. And the boat’s power goes out. Let me pause here to salute the ship’s engineer, the Amazonian Natalya. She’s tough, smart, gorgeous, and dressed in a skimpy top. On the open ocean. At night. In a thunderstorm. While everyone else is dressed for heavy weather. Or, in Willow’s case, a deep-sea dive. The gender balance is strikingly unusual for an adventure movie. Instead of the standard Hollywood ratio of three men to one woman, the boat features four of each. The diver’s a woman, the ship’s engineer ditto. Ava seems to be some kind of marine biologist, though she doesn’t get much chance to show it. Lara is in charge, more or less, and she and Bryce are a thing. Bryce is mostly there to run around with a gun and be Manly. In a way I suppose he’s the guy version of Natalya in her skimpy top. This film aims to appeal to a range of genders and orientations. So far it’s chugging along fairly predictably. Humans hunt monster. Monster hunts and starts eating humans. Evil captain gets clobbered by Nessie, but this time she’s not looking for dinner. The rescue team get him below, where he proceeds to be drastically and lengthily sick, spewing mouthfuls of nasty-looking foam. Ava nurses him, not particularly competently, while Travis and Lara exchange frantic communications—Lara from the boat, Travis from the pod—and Bryce tries to help Natalya get the boat’s power  up again. Nessie eats Natalya. And the captain gets progressively worse, with more foam and escalating convulsions. Ava flutters and dithers and doesn’t do much. Now comes the twist. I let out a yell when it happened, and scared the cat. OH BOY IT’S AN ALIEN IT LOOKS LIKE A NASTY LITTLE SPIDER IT POPS OUT OF HIS BODY WHOA. Yes! It’s an Alien! And now we have big giant monster circling the boat, Travis in the pod with—lesser twist!—a load of torpedoes, and a tiny skittery monster hunting Bryce and Ava and Lara through the bowels of the boat. The tiny spidery thing doesn’t stay tiny. It’s growing. At the rate it’s doing that, Ava says, while she’s covered with evil captain’s blood and starting to giggle wildly, give it a day and it will be as big as a human. Right, so. Nessie is a she, and apparently she’s an Alien, though she looks like a giant plesiosaur. This is how she reproduces. She spits goo all over a host, the goo burrows in and eats the host from the inside out, and out pops tiny spidery baby Nessie. Presumably when baby finishes growing, it morphs into a giant plesiosaur with many, many teeth and a hate on for humans who hunt it. Baby Nessie gets Ava, who holed up in a space with only one exit. Not smart, Ava. That leaves Lara and Bryce on the boat and Travis in the pod. But Travis is running out of air. He has his torpedoes, and he’s ready to make the sacrifice. He’ll blow up mama. The other two will have to take care of baby. The pod blows. Lara and Bryce have a sad moment, and apparent amnesia about baby Nessie. But they’re alive, and they’ll get the boat running and head back to shore. Victory! Not so fast, says Nessie, rising up out of the sea. And that’s a wrap. I have questions. Will VillainCorp try again? Will they nuke Nessie from orbit? Or will she vanish into the depths of the ocean? Will the boat float away with its deadly parasitic cargo, waiting for some unsuspecting rescuer? Or will mama retrieve her baby and leave the boat empty except for a couple of baffling bodies? It’s a big ocean. It could be years, if ever, before she’s found again—if she even wants to be. Unless she’s hungry. Or it’s breeding season. Or she decides to continue her vendetta against the humans who tried to hunt her down.[end-mark] The post Nessie Strikes Back: <i>The Loch Ness Horror</i> (2023) appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
36 w

How Degenerate Are the Harris People? This Degenerate.
Favicon 
hotair.com

How Degenerate Are the Harris People? This Degenerate.

How Degenerate Are the Harris People? This Degenerate.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
36 w

Exclusive: How the Capitol Police were set up to fail on January 6
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Exclusive: How the Capitol Police were set up to fail on January 6

As part of Blaze Media’s three-part mini-documentary series “A Day in the Life of Harry Dunn,” we continue to update readers on how we arrived at this point in our “Truth About January 6” series. You can find part one here. Despite denials from the U.S. Capitol Police and some congressional investigators, evidence quickly emerged after the January 6, 2021, protests and riots that Capitol Police officers were intentionally under-deployed. Testimonies from Capitol Police officers in various Jan. 6 trials, along with radio transmissions and whistleblower statements, have provided many answers. These findings also suggest a coordinated cover-up to keep this information from the American public. If the Capitol Police had been fully deployed that day, the breach likely would not have occurred. Ashli Babbitt and Rosanne Boyland might still be alive, and the Department of Justice’s 1,500 prosecutions — ranging from trespassing to seditious conspiracy — might never have happened. Additionally, members of the Capitol Police, D.C. Metropolitan Police, and several convicted Jan. 6 participants might not have died by suicide in the aftermath. Although I have long suspected that trained provocateurs manipulated the events of January 6 under the watch of the Capitol Police command center, many believe that frontline, uniformed Capitol Police officers were knowingly complicit and even initiated the violence. Video evidence contradicts that claim. Here’s a sample of the social media comments that followed my initial blog series — written before my time at Blaze Media — in which I referred to the Capitol Police as “sacrificial pawns” on January 6: “The Capitol Police were willing participants by following those D.C. fascists’ orders. I have no sympathy for them or their families.” “Don’t sign up to collect a paycheck defending a corrupt government.” “They’re a disgrace to the uniform and America. How f***ing dare they.” “You’re being played.” These comments came from the political right, but the left wasn’t silent either. Some were quite bloodthirsty, suggesting that every Capitol Police officer should have replicated Lt. Michael Byrd’s gunshot and left us with “a thousand more Ashli Babbitts.” Many who called for defunding the police after George Floyd’s death in 2020 suddenly became strong supporters of “Back the Blue” following the events of January 6, 2021. In my January 6 writings, I’ve often stressed that I had to reassess some of my initial assumptions as more evidence surfaced. For example, in my first article about January 6, published on January 13, 2021, I misidentified the officers in “fluorescent-sleeved jackets racing down steps toward the first upper tier above street level” as Capitol Police. They were actually members of the D.C. Metropolitan Police. This may seem like a minor distinction — especially to the “all cops are bastards” crowd — but these details are crucial as we work to uncover and present the full truth of that day. Most importantly, who in the command chain set up or allowed these events to unfold? When it comes to the many unanswered questions, odd circumstances, and unindicted figures, we don’t need to agree on every detail. We also don’t need to agree on each event, video, or police officer’s actions to find common ground on one key point I’ve emphasized about January 6: I saw bad people doing bad things, good people doing good things, and even otherwise good people doing really stupid things. This observation applies to both individual protesters and police officers. There were heroes and villains on both sides of that thin blue line on January 6. My questions about the Capitol Police’s deployment, orders, and actions on January 6 began with my first published article. From the moment my Uber driver dropped me off at the Washington Monument around 9:30 a.m. until I reached the lower west terrace of the Capitol Building at exactly 1:19 p.m., neither I nor my camera saw a single law enforcement officer. My video captured no police presence at the Washington Monument lawn on January 6.Screenshot/Steve Baker As the crowd swelled from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, it was hard to imagine not seeing any police presence among such a massive group in the nation’s capital. Police and Secret Service officers heavily guarded the Ellipse stage, where President Trump was set to speak, but the crowd’s density kept me from entering that area. When I eventually started walking from the Washington Monument lawn toward the Capitol Building again, I still didn’t see or capture on camera a single police officer. As I approached the Peace Monument, sirens signaled the arrival of D.C. Metro Police units. At the Reflecting Pool, I finally spotted Metro Police officers in fluorescent jackets streaming down the Capitol steps toward the lower west terrace. I then heard the first flash-bang grenades and saw tear gas released on the lower west terrace. No barricades or police lines blocked my way — initial agitators and provocateurs had removed them about 20 to 25 minutes earlier — so I ran to the terrace and began recording the violence at exactly 1:19 p.m., just three minutes after President Trump left the Ellipse stage, more than a mile away. A screenshot from my video as I approached the Capitol on January 6, 2021.Screenshot/Steve Baker For a year, I publicly asked: "Why wasn’t there a police presence on the Washington Monument lawn? Why didn’t I see any police on the mile-long walk to the Capitol?" and "Why were so few Capitol Police officers on duty at the Capitol, considering the planned rallies, marches, and legally permitted events on the Capitol lawn that day?" I initially estimated that fewer than 200 Capitol Police officers were at the Capitol on January 6. A year later, on the anniversary of the event, I returned to D.C. to seek answers. I asked patrolling Capitol Police officers those questions, and I also wanted to know what orders they received that day. I was particularly interested in what seemed like a "stand-down" or "pull-back" order at around 2:00 p.m. None of the officers I approached on the streets or at the Capitol would answer. At the time, I didn’t know about the nondisclosure agreements Capitol Police had signed under Yogananda Pittman during her seven-month tenure as acting chief of police. On December 16, 2021, Forbes made a convoluted attempt to answer the question about Capitol Police deployment on January 6: USCP documents show that at 2 p.m. on that day, only 1,214 officers were “on site” across the Capitol complex of buildings. Congressional investigators concluded, however, that USCP could only account for 417 officers and could not account for the whereabouts of the remaining 797 officers. In late 2022, when I first met with former Capitol Police officer turned whistleblower Lt. Tarik Johnson, he confirmed that my initial estimate of “fewer than 200” Capitol Police officers at the Capitol Building during the first wave of violence on January 6 was accurate. Johnson explained that during previous protest events, the standard operating procedure required an “all hands on deck” approach for Capitol Police. On those days, officers working the night shift were required to stay and work a double shift through the next day. But on January 6, Capitol Police command sent those officers home after their shifts, treating it like a routine day at the office. In a follow-up phone conversation, Johnson revealed more about the deceptions Capitol Police leadership spread regarding force deployment on January 6. Addressing internal department and congressional investigations that claimed officials “could not account for the whereabouts of the remaining 797 officers,” Johnson said, "It's a bald-faced lie, and you can quote me on that." Johnson explained that all Capitol Police officers clock in and clock out electronically at the start and end of each shift. Once clocked in, each officer is tracked throughout the tour of duty, making it impossible for their commanders not to know their whereabouts. This information should still be available in the computer logs — assuming the logs haven’t been erased. When asked why Capitol Police leadership would cover up information about force deployment, Johnson responded, “Because they don’t want to tell you where the officers were or what they were doing. They don’t want anyone to know how many of our officers were on administrative leave that day.” My investigations, which include interviews with Capitol Police officers and congressional investigators, revealed further embarrassment, as several officers went into hiding once the violence began, locking themselves in offices and closets. Another key issue involves the “diversion events,” when two pipe bombs were coincidentally discovered within minutes of the first provocateurs breaching the west side Capitol barricade. The pipe bombs were found at both the Republican National Committee and Democratic National Committee headquarters — two of nearly 20 buildings under the Capitol Police’s security purview. Johnson couldn’t estimate how many officers were diverted to the RNC and DNC after the bombs were discovered. However, he emphasized that the emergency response still doesn’t account for the missing whereabouts of 797 officers. He noted that exact records of how many officers were diverted, and precisely who, should be easily retrievable from Capitol Police computer records. Set up to fail? The first Oath Keepers trial featured the testimony of Stephen Brown, a Florida-based event planner hired by the controversial figure Ali Alexander, a Trump supporter and founder of Stop the Steal. Brown’s job was to secure permits from the Capitol Police for an event on the Capitol grounds. He was also responsible for organizing the rental of the staging and public address system and coordinating the scheduling of VIP speakers and stage security, handled by members of the Oath Keepers. Brown testified that he had previously planned many protest events in the nation’s capital, with attendance ranging from as few as 5,000 to as many as 300,000 protesters. Under direct examination by Oath Keeper Kelly Meggs’ defense attorney Stanley Woodward, Brown described the surprisingly small presence of Capitol officers during the delivery and setup of the staging and PA system. He noted that at previous events he’d organized on Capitol grounds, he had seen “three, four, even five times the size of police presence, including SWAT teams,” compared to what was present on January 6. The inconvenient truth is that my camera, Stephen Brown’s testimony, and statements by Lt. Johnson and other Capitol Police officers suggest a deliberate under-deployment of officers that day — a day in which we now know, and as I have previously written: Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, Asst. Chief Yogananda Pittman, head of protective and intelligence operations, the D.C. Metro Police, the United States Park Police, the White House, the Pentagon, the National Guard, both the Senate and House of Representative Sergeants-at-Arms, Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, the FBI, and other federal agencies all knew that tens of thousands of protestors would be descending upon the Capitol grounds that day. An unnamed Capitol Police officer, just days after the melee, told the Associated Press, “During the 4th of July concerts and the Memorial Day concerts, we don’t have people come up and say, ‘We’re going to seize the Capitol.’ But yet, you bring everybody in, you meet before. That never happened for this event.” According to the Washington Post, only a week after the Capitol was breached, “an FBI office in Virginia issued an explicit warning that extremists were preparing to travel to Washington to commit violence and ‘war,’ according to an internal document reviewed by The Washington Post.” Instead of “all hands on deck,” frontline Capitol Police officers were somewhere between one-tenth to one-fifth strength when it came time to respond to what was coming their way. Whether an operational failure or deliberate under-deployment, this set up the circumstances enabling the breach of the Capitol Building by a relatively small number of aggressive and violent rioters. Ultimately, it remains inexplicable why only 200 to 300 violent perpetrators wielding sticks, flagpoles, clubs, and bear spray were able to overpower two fully armed law enforcement agencies, the tactical units of nearly every three-letter federal agency, and an unknown number of undercover law enforcement assets to breach what is supposed to be one of the most secure government facilities in the world. Unless, of course, they were set up to fail. Most Capitol Police officers on duty that day believe that to be the case. This would explain why Capitol Police union members gave then-acting Chief Yogananda Pittman a 92% “no-confidence” vote only five weeks after her curiously absent leadership from their command center on January 6.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
36 w

MSNBC joins Dems in smearing Holocaust survivor, other Trump supporters at Madison Square Garden as Nazis
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

MSNBC joins Dems in smearing Holocaust survivor, other Trump supporters at Madison Square Garden as Nazis

MSNBC, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, and other Harris allies smeared a Holocaust survivor and tens of thousands of other Americans who attended President Donald Trump's high-energy campaign event Sunday at Madison Square Garden, characterizing them as today's equivalent of Nazis and fascists. Despite the efforts of New York state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal and other radical Democrats to shut down the event and a campaign by Lincoln Project false-flaggers to empty the stands, a diverse crowd filled the Garden to hear from numerous speakers, including former first lady Melania Trump, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Hulk Hogan, and Tony Hinchcliffe — a comedian who appears to have broken leftists' thin skin with his usual cutting humor. Trump, exuding the joy his opponent once laid claim to, spoke of the dormancy of American greatness during the Biden-Harris years and the prospect of its return and maximization if he wins a second term. While the crowd of tens of thousands appeared receptive to the speakers' remarks, Democrats and their media allies descended into fits of hysteria, leaning hard into preplanned Nazi comparisons and more of the incendiary rhetoric that set the stage for two known assassination attempts. MSNBC went the distance for the Harris campaign in its coverage of the event, effectively smearing the multitudes in attendance — including Trump's numerous Jewish supporters and even a Holocaust survivor — as Nazis and fascists. In a segment captioned, "Trump's MSG rally comes 85 years after pro-Nazi rally at famed arena," MSNBC talking head Jonathan Capehart said that the event was "particularly chilling because in 1939, more than 20,000 supporters of a different fascist leader, Adolf Hitler, packed the Garden for a so-called pro-America rally — a rally where speakers voiced anti-Semitic rhetoric from a stage draped with Nazi banners." MSNBC juxtaposed clips of a Nazi rally with footage from Trump's event at the Garden. 'I know more about Hitler than Kamala will ever know in a thousand lifetimes.' Capehart — who refrained from noting that the Democratic Party held its national conventions at the Garden in 1976, 1980, and 1992 — then appealed to anti-Trump historians Ruth Ben-Ghiat and Anne Applebaum for help smearing Trump and his supporters as Nazi parallels. Steve Benen, the producer of "The Rachel Maddow Show," similarly likened the Sunday campaign event to a Nazi rally, writing, "The Republican’s Madison Square Garden event was ugly. It was offensive. It was vulgar. It was hateful. It drew obvious parallels to the 1939 event." Time magazine, which again demonstrated its aversion to the truth last month, released an article ahead of the rally titled "How the Trump Rally at Madison Square Garden Follows a Long Tradition in Politics," emphasizing that Nazis once gathered where Trump supporters would soon rally. Jerry Wartski, a 94-year-old Holocaust survivor who survived Auschwitz and the Nazis' death marches, was among those at the rally smeared by MSNBC and other Democratic propaganda outfits. Wartski noted in a recent video, "Adolf Hitler invaded Poland when I was 9 years old. He murdered my parents and most of my family. I know more about Hitler than Kamala will ever know in a thousand lifetimes. For her to accuse President Trump of being like Hitler is the worst thing I've ever heard in my 75 years of living in the United States." The Holocaust survivor appears to have singled out Harris because of her suggestion at a recent CNN town hall that Trump is a fascist and previous insinuations on the same theme. The Nazi narrative embraced Sunday by MSNBC began in earnest earlier this month when Hoylman-Sigal wrote on X, "Let's be clear. Allowing Trump to hold an event at MSG is equivalent to the infamous Nazis rally at Madison Square Garden on February 20, 1939." At the time, Blaze News senior editor and Washington correspondent Christopher Bedford noted, "A better comparison might have been Young Americans for Freedom's 1962 Madison Square Garden Rally, when those teenagers organized well over 18,000 attendees, and more outside, for a rally against global communism." "New York liberals were shocked then how many of the kids rejected their tired ideas, but guys like Hoylman-Sigal don't actually know any history, so they just prove their own intolerant bigotries by calling for anyone who opposes their own tired ideas to be shut down," added Bedford. Hoylman-Sigal was later aided in his narrative campaign by failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who — apparently happy to forget her husband's 1992 rally at the Garden — told CNN that Trump would be "re-enacting the Madison Square Garden rally in 1939." 'They are a collection of hypocritical, mentally unstable children.' Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz soon joined in, saying, "There's a direct parallel to a big rally that happened in the mid-1930s at Madison Square Garden and don't think that he doesn't know for one second exactly what they're doing there." The Democratic National Committee even projected Nazi accusations onto the Garden's exterior on the day, claiming, "Trump praised Hitler." DNC spokesperson Abhi Rahman noted on X, "@TheDemocrats are reminding voters that Americans can’t afford Trump’s unstable and unwell behavior — even at his own rallies." Critics of the apparently coordinated Nazi smear suggested that the media was not only agitating for violence but diminishing the true horror of the Holocaust and the evil of the Nazis for political gain. Manhattan Institute fellow Ilya Shapiro noted, "Those who liken Trump to Hitler and the MSG rally to the Nazi rally aren't just smearing Trump, but minimizing Hitler/Nazis - which, given the antisemitic nature of the progressive left, may well be the point." "INCITEMENT," wrote the popular X user @amuse. "Yesterday's Trump rally was filled with Americans from every walk of life including orthodox, conservative, reform, and secular Jews. I saw a woman in a burka. It wasn't an anything like a Nazi rally. Shame on MSNBC." Dr. Simon Goddek tweeted to MSNBC, "You deserve to be canceled to the core." Some users shared images of John F. Kennedy and other former presidents speaking at the Garden, while others asked whether the Knicks might be Nazi-like for playing at the venue. Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk wrote, "Never mind that JFK and FDR both spoke at the same arena. Nope, those speeches were fine, because they were Democrats. Now, they're rewriting the rules so that big political rallies in a big city is 'Nazi' behavior. The left call themselves 'the adults in the room,' but they are the exact opposite. They are a collection of hypocritical, mentally unstable children. They cannot be allowed to hold power." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
Gamers Realm
Gamers Realm
36 w

New tactical RPG Flint is like XCOM 2 mixed with pirates and a great story
Favicon 
www.pcgamesn.com

New tactical RPG Flint is like XCOM 2 mixed with pirates and a great story

You play Assassin’s Creed Black Flag, or maybe Sea of Thieves or Skull and Bones, and you realize that being a pirate actually takes an enormous amount of skill. Yes there are big brawls and rambunctious parties, but you’ve also got to be shrewd, imaginative, and, surprisingly, an effective organizer and people manager. The best pirates use strategy and cunning - like the perfect party composition in Baldur’s Gate 3, the right combos in Diablo 4, and the visionary flanking maneuvers necessary in XCOM 2, if you want to rule the Seven Seas, you need vision as well as violence. Enter Flint: Treasure of Oblivion, a smart, tactical CRPG with dice rolls, deckbuilding, and a distinctive visual style. Coming very soon to Steam, PCGamesN just got an exclusive look at its new fact-and-fight-filled trailer. Continue reading New tactical RPG Flint is like XCOM 2 mixed with pirates and a great story MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best RPG games, Best pirate games, Best PC DnD games
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
36 w

'Interesting Hypocrisy': Chris Hayes Found It Unacceptable for Cop to Appear at Trump Rally in Uniform
Favicon 
twitchy.com

'Interesting Hypocrisy': Chris Hayes Found It Unacceptable for Cop to Appear at Trump Rally in Uniform

'Interesting Hypocrisy': Chris Hayes Found It Unacceptable for Cop to Appear at Trump Rally in Uniform
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
36 w

Tony Hinchcliffe Takes Critics (Especially Tim Walz) APART for Losing it Over His PR Joke, TRIGGERS AOC
Favicon 
twitchy.com

Tony Hinchcliffe Takes Critics (Especially Tim Walz) APART for Losing it Over His PR Joke, TRIGGERS AOC

Tony Hinchcliffe Takes Critics (Especially Tim Walz) APART for Losing it Over His PR Joke, TRIGGERS AOC
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
36 w

Alaska Man Monday - National Christmas Tree, Highway Flagging, and the Alaska Highway
Favicon 
redstate.com

Alaska Man Monday - National Christmas Tree, Highway Flagging, and the Alaska Highway

Alaska Man Monday - National Christmas Tree, Highway Flagging, and the Alaska Highway
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
36 w

Monday Morning Minute
Favicon 
redstate.com

Monday Morning Minute

Monday Morning Minute
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
36 w

Fourth Circuit Sides With DOJ in Virginia Non-Citizen Voter Skirmish; Next Stop: Supreme Court
Favicon 
redstate.com

Fourth Circuit Sides With DOJ in Virginia Non-Citizen Voter Skirmish; Next Stop: Supreme Court

Fourth Circuit Sides With DOJ in Virginia Non-Citizen Voter Skirmish; Next Stop: Supreme Court
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 6411 out of 56666
  • 6407
  • 6408
  • 6409
  • 6410
  • 6411
  • 6412
  • 6413
  • 6414
  • 6415
  • 6416
  • 6417
  • 6418
  • 6419
  • 6420
  • 6421
  • 6422
  • 6423
  • 6424
  • 6425
  • 6426

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund