'charred remains were found inside the walk in oven'

Former independent presidential candidate  Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was terrified to hear of renowned  Dr. Robert Epstein’s study uncovering Google's election interference and censorship. On the Oct. 22 edition of the RFK Podcast, Kennedy learned from Epstein about Alphabet's attempt to influence the upcoming presidential election through its search engine Epstein is widely celebrated for his research involving big tech censorship, influence, and monopolization. Epstein began the conversation by sharing how Google’s homepage disproportionately incentivizes Democrats to vote and warned of the control this gives it. “They’re sending out various kinds of vote reminders—register to vote, mail in your ballot, go vote—to Democrats at about two and a half times they’re doing to Republicans,” he told Kennedy. “Now think about that. Think how that impacts the vote over time, that’s why Google can control so many votes”  Kennedy inquired about methods Google employs to impact the thinking of undecided voters during an election year. Epstein shared the disturbing reality. “The one way they do it is by censorship. In other words, they suppress content and again, you don't know what they don't show,” he said.  Kennedy shared recent research Epstein had exposed to the public from a study done on Google’s bias: “A Google search suggestion can shift undecided voters' opinions from a 50/50 split to almost 90/10, all without user awareness. That is terrifying. That is the end of democracy” Epstein followed this comment by sharing the minimum it could influence voters, stating: “So 4% is the absolute bare minimum that Google alone can shift without anyone knowing.”  This research Epstein and Kennedy cite is directly from his testimony on December 13, 2023, before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights.  MRC released a study on Oct. 15 that put this to the test. The results were disturbing. They displayed Google’s bias as the tech giant buried former President Donald Trump’s campaign website under an array of news stories by leftist outlets. On the contrary, Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign website came first in results, any conservative media did not appear until page eight of the results.  Epstein shifted the conversation to Google’s subsidiary, YouTube, which reaches an audience of over 120 million users daily. “Google has admitted that 70% of the content people watch on YouTube has been recommended by their algorithm,” Epstein said. He then warned about the particular danger it poses to a younger audience, unaware of the attempt to persuade their thinking. Epstein once more made the glaring connection between Google and the Democratic party clear. “These people, by the way, are very determined—Google more than the other companies because Google has a very very strong progressive left culture,” he shared, going on to share the disturbing metrics regarding political donations coming from Google employees. “More than 96% of their donations go from their employees go to Democrats.” Conservatives are under attack! Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on hate speech, and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Earlier this week, leaked documents from Britain’s nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate sparked a massive scandal when it was discovered that the organization’s top priority is to “kill Musk’s Twitter.” In other words, its top priority is to eliminate the only social media platform left that acknowledges free speech. The founder of CCDH, Morgan Sweeney, not only helped install current Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who he now serves under as chief of staff, he also has close ties to the Biden-Harris administration. The Labour Party, which has been destroyed by socialism, even paid to send Sweeney to the DNC this year. The leaked documents also revealed the nonprofit’s intentions to strengthen its ties to America’s Democratic Party. And it certainly seems that’s happening. In addition to the CCDH meeting with U.S. lawmakers to influence legislation regarding platform regulation and censorship, nearly 100 Labour Party staffers are currently in the United States campaigning for Kamala Harris. That certainly seems like foreign election interference. However, it’s “apparently legal here in the United States as long as there’s no money changing hands,” says Glenn Beck. Former U.K. Prime Minister Liz Truss, however, suspects that whatever is going on is far from legal. — (@) “These people who are coming over. Who's paying for their airfare? Who’s paying for their accommodation? Has that been properly accounted for? Have the receipts been produced?” she asks. Under U.S. Federal law, “contributions, donations, expenditures (including independent expenditures) and disbursements solicited, directed, received or made directly or indirectly by or from foreign nationals in connection with any federal, state or local election” are strictly prohibited. England’s Electoral Law states the same — that only British citizens can donate to U.K. campaigns. Truss says that if the situation were reversed and Americans were flown to the U.K. to campaign in a British election, “that would count towards election expenses, and it would be classed as a foreign donation, which is illegal.” To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above.

Depending where you are in the western hemisphere, freedom of speech is either all but gone or it’s precariously hanging in the balance, as governments try to crush the very right that has differentiated the West from other more draconian regions. In America, Elon Musk has become the face of the movement to preserve our First Amendment. As the owner of X, a global company, Musk would like to champion free speech overseas by keeping the X platform free of government censorship. But he’s been met with hostility from would-be totalitarians all over the world who despise him for fighting for the rights of the people. The latest example of this is Great Britain, where leaked plans from the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a British nonprofit, reveal the company’s top priority — “kill Musk’s Twitter.” What’s even more disturbing is the reality that the CCDH has strong ties to Keir Starmer, the current prime minister of the United Kingdom, and the Biden-Harris administration. The founder of the organization, Morgan McSweeney, not only played a major role in Starmer’s rise to power, he also serves as Starmer’s chief of staff. Further, McSweeney is currently meddling in American politics by gunning for Harris and Walz to win the election. The Labour Party even paid for him to attend this year’s DNC. In the United States, McSweeney’s CCDH has been meeting with lawmakers to urge legislation aimed at increasing platform regulation and censorship. Former Prime Minister Liz Truss recently met with Glenn Beck and shared her thoughts on the leaked documents and the overall state of both the U.K. and U.S. — (@) “Our governments are in cahoots doing really bad things to the public,” said Glenn. “There have been numerous public attacks on X by the prime minister. Now, I don't believe that he will succeed if he takes on Elon Musk, but the mentality isn't to have an honest discussion about what's happening in Britain. The mentality is to try and quash any dissent and stop people talking about the very real issues that are affecting us,” said Truss, noting that one of the most glaring issues is “the sheer scale of illegal immigration into [the U.K.].” Truss, who’s been following the U.S. election, says that comments from the likes of Hillary Clinton and other “members of the Democrat campaign” reveal that the United States and England are on the same path. “Not only are [Democrats] putting in place these disastrous policies; they’re also trying to stop anybody from talking about them,” she said. “This is not about left versus right, Democrats versus Republicans. This is about elites against the people,” added Glenn. To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above. Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Less than two weeks from the presidential election, Republicans are breaking turnout records for early voting and mail-in ballots across several key states.In previous election cycles, Democrats have overwhelmingly outperformed Republicans when it comes to voting early. In 2020, over 22 million Democrats voted early, while just 15 million Republicans and nearly 12 million independents did the same. Although more Democrats have voted early, Republicans are actually outperforming them in some crucial swing states.Early voting was notably higher in 2020 due to the pandemic, but the trend remains true for previous election cycles. In 2016, just eight million Republicans voted in advance, as well as nearly 10 million Democrats and five million independents. This time around, Republicans are narrowing the gap. With over 26 million early votes counted, 11 million have been from Democrats, over 10 million have been from Republicans, and nearly five million have been from independents. Historically, the Republican Party has been averse to the idea of early voting. This time around, Trump has made the change to embrace it, and Democrats are beginning to panic. "A few more days like this, though, and the Democratic bedwetting will reach epic proportions," Jon Ralston, CEO of the Nevada Independent, told The Hill about early voting in Clark County, home of Las Vegas. "I think it comes solely down to the fact that last cycle, Donald Trump told Republicans not to vote early, and this time, the party is telling them to vote early," Jon McHenry, a GOP polling analyst and vice president at North Star Opinion Research, told Blaze News. "Pretty simple."Although more Democrats have voted early, Republicans are actually outperforming them in some crucial swing states. In Georgia, 48% of the early votes have been cast by Republicans, while 46% have been from Democrats. Similarly, in Arizona, Republicans are outperforming Democrats 42% to 36%, as well as 40% to 36% in Nevada.The two parties are nearly tied in North Carolina, with 35% of early votes coming from Democrats and 34% from Republicans. “The large mail ballot lead enjoyed by Dems has been erased and more by the GOP lead in in-person early voting,” Ralston told The Hill. While Republicans are making strides in the Sun Belt, Democrats have held onto their lead in the Rust Belt states. In Michigan, 52% of early votes were cast by Democrats, while just 38% came from Republicans. In Pennsylvania, the swing state with the highest electoral vote count, 62% of early votes came from Democrats and 29% came from Republicans. In Wisconsin, 37% of early votes were cast by Democrats and 21% of Republicans did the same. "It doesn't matter a whole lot, whether you get them early or you get them late, as long as they get there," McHenry told Blaze News. "The advantage of getting them early is that you know that they're already banked. You won't have to sweat Election Day quite as much."Notably, nearly half of early votes in Wisconsin and a third of votes in North Carolina came from independents. Roughly a quarter of early votes in Nevada and Arizona also came from independents. Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia have had the lowest independent turnout, bringing in 10%, 9%, and 6%, respectively. "Just because you're registered as a Democrat doesn't mean you voted for Kamala Harris," McHenry told Blaze News. "You might be registered as a Democrat, but you've gotten sick to death of the Democrats over the last four years and just didn't bother to change your registration. You might just vote for Trump." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Vice President Kamala Harris' less-than-stellar performance at her town hall with CNN on Wednesday was filled with awkward answers and nonanswers to basic questions on her stance on several important topics.One such example was when an audience member asked her to name one of her weaknesses.Starting off by saying she would actually consider it to be a strength, Harris said she surrounds herself with a team of people with different viewpoints.'Her habit is to kind of go to word salad city.'"My team will tell you, I am constantly saying, ‘Let‘s kick the tire on that. Let‘s kick the tires on it,’ because, listen, I — as I mentioned earlier, I started my career as a prosecutor. I was a courtroom prosecutor. I‘ve tried everything, from low-level offenses to homicides, and I learned at a very early stage of my career and adult life that my actions have a direct impact on real people in a very fundamental way," Harris explained.Because of that supposed self-awareness, Harris said she oftentimes does not have a quick answer to a question in settings like interviews because she needs to consult with that team."So I may not be quick to have the answer as soon as you ask it about a specific policy issue sometimes because I‘m going to want to research it. I‘m going to want to study it — I‘m kind of a nerd sometimes, I confess — and some might call that a weakness, especially if you‘re, you know, in an interview or just kind of, you know, being asked a certain question and you’re expected to have the right answer right away, but that‘s how I — that‘s how I work," Harris said as she laughed.Word salad answers like that did not impress even longtime Democrats on CNN. Former Obama adviser David Axelrod said, "The thing that would concern me is when she doesn't want to answer a question, her habit is to kind of go to word salad city, and she did that on a couple of answers."CNN host Dana Bash said she had been hearing from Democrats that "if her goal was to close the deal, they're not sure she did that."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Progressive journalists and politicians have endlessly accused Donald Trump of colluding with Russia to influence U.S. elections. But a new bombshell report reveals that the Kamala Harris campaign is working with the British Labour Party to censor social media and news outlets within the United States, hoping to sway the 2024 presidential election.Many Republicans had already raised concerns when reports emerged this month that more than 100 Labour staffers traveled to the United States to campaign for Harris in North Carolina and Pennsylvania. Journalist Paul Thacker and Matt Taibbi’s report revealed a deeper relationship between the Harris campaign and foreign political agents, with a shared agenda that includes destroying Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter).Americans’ free-speech rights must be protected from all enemies, foreign and domestic.After eight years of accusing Donald Trump of treasonous foreign collusion, it’s now clear that the Democratic Party is comfortable working with elements of the British government to manipulate U.S. politics.Thacker and Taibbi show how foreign political operatives are not only advising the Harris campaign but also directing critical aspects of it. The highly partisan nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate has served as a vehicle for foreign influence. CCDH, a subsidiary of British think tank Labour Together, is led by progressive strategist Morgan McSweeney, who also advises Harris.In the U.K., CCDH has championed censorship under the guise of fighting “misinformation.” Its U.S.-based office has helped organize advertiser boycotts of right-leaning news outlets like the Federalist and Zero Hedge.McSweeney, credited with Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s rise, has pushed for extreme measures to suppress free speech in Britain. After riots erupted in response to the mass knifing of several children earlier this summer, Starmer emptied prisons of violent criminals to make room for political dissidents. His government has cracked down on social media posts, even arresting people for sharing content critical of immigration policy. Additionally, Starmer’s government has been arresting Christians for silently praying in public. This is the level of censorship the Democrats wish to enforce, First Amendment be damned.The ruling classes of the U.S. and U.K. share more in common with each other than with their citizens. Both the Labour and Democratic Parties are trying to suppress populist movements while demographically transforming their nations to secure permanent political power. Both parties’ leaders view themselves as part of a global order with a duty to establish a unified political consensus. That’s why Harris’ campaign did not hesitate to work with a foreign government to manipulate the U.S. political process.Thacker and Taibbi also uncovered an internal CCDH document outlining annual priorities. It reads like a cartoon villain’s to-do list. It calls for regulatory action in the EU, U.K., and United States, with the top priority being the destruction of Twitter. The fact that they used the phrase “kill Musk’s Twitter” in a professional document shows how sinister this operation truly is. Foreign agents are working with Harris’ campaign to undermine Americans’ free speech, using the oppressive tactics they’ve employed in their own countries as the model.Other disclosed documents suggest coordination between the CCDH and U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.). An invitation-only conference hosted by the foreign influence group included White House advisers, Democratic Party staffers, and members of influential progressive NGOs.The Labour Party’s influence extends far beyond the Harris campaign. It is deeply intertwined with the broader progressive sphere. If China or Russia engaged in political infiltration of this magnitude, it would be seen as a dangerous threat to U.S. sovereignty and security. Yet, the Democratic Party has facilitated this foreign interference at every turn.Just weeks ago, I wrote about former Biden-Harris administration climate envoy John Kerry’s remarks to the World Economic Forum, where he lamented how the First Amendment protects American citizens from the censorship regimes installed in other Western nations. It’s clear that the global elite is working to unify control over communication in Western countries. Starmer, McSweeney, and the British Labour Party have created a model based on partnerships with advocacy groups targeting “disinformation,” which the Democratic Party now seeks to import to America.American progressives have already built an entire NGO complex focused on this goal, and they are now turning it against Elon Musk’s X, which has declared itself a haven for free speech. Musk recognizes the profound danger of this attack and has vowed to take on not just the CCDH but also its donors. It’s a start.Kamala and her foreign friends are engaging in criminal, deceitful actions that threaten U.S. national security. Those responsible must face consequences, and this foreign influence must be expelled. The free-speech rights of the American people must be protected from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Barry Wernick, a Republican running for Texas House District 108, reported Tuesday that he filed a complaint with the Texas secretary of state against the Dallas County Elections Department after he claimed he found his actual ballot posted online.Wernick, endorsed by former President Donald Trump, shared the news on X, explaining how he made the shocking discovery.'Irreparable damage may have already been done.'According to Wernick, he went to the DCED's website to view his sample ballot and was redirected to the Clarity Elections portal.Clarity Elections is an election night reporting portal that is operated by SOE Software. "After clicking on the link & being transferred to the Clarity Elections portal, instead of seeing a sample ballot, I viewed a downloadable & printable .pdf file of my actual die-cut mail-in ballot with a colored stamp of the initials (HG) of Election Administrator Heider Garcia," Wernick stated.Wernick shared a screenshot of Garcia's initials at the bottom of the ballot. He noted that the online ballot's markings were consistent with an actual ballot and not a sample. The images of the online ballot were "not locked, encrypted, or watermarked in any way," Wernick added. He called for the DCED to immediately take the ballots offline. "Because there is no law against publishing an actual mail-in ballot, anyone with access to a registered voter's legal first name and last name and the same voter's birth date could easily and legally print out or digitally manipulate that voter's ballot," he continued. "Then that person could illegally and potentially surreptitiously inject it into the system thereby disenfranchising and diluting my vote, in this instance, and any other registered voter's vote without getting caught."Wernick added, "Irreparable damage may have already been done. But enjoining Dallas County Elections Department from publishing this information could mitigate any future potential damage to our election system."Blaze News replicated the process Wernick used to access his ballot by using another Texas voter's information. The results were identical: The ballot displayed online lacked a "sample" watermark, included timing marks, and featured Garcia's initials at the bottom, just like Wernick's.Rick Weible, who appeared in Dinesh D'Souza's documentary "Vindicating Trump" and has repeatedly attempted to expose the vulnerabilities of the Election Systems & Software accumulator, said, "This ballot can be printed and used for swaps and injections ... no timing marks or initials should be on any sample ballot."In a statement to Blaze News, the Texas secretary of state said, “I cannot speak to any formal election complaints because that information is considered private.”“I can point out that printing a sample ballot does not provide a means for it to be inserted into the election process as there are checks for ballots both for in-person voting and voting by mail. There is not a way for voters to use a sample ballot in place of a regular ballot,” the secretary of state added.The Dallas County Elections Department and SOE Software did not respond to a request for comment. — (@) Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) appears willing to kneecap his party before stepping down as Republican leader at year's end. The 82-year-old, who figures he has a shot at re-election in 2026, reportedly lashed out against the increasingly diverse, populist, and anti-war GOP in an upcoming biography, claiming the "MAGA movement is completely wrong." In an excerpt from the biography obtained by CNN, McConnell told the Associated Press' Michael Tackett, "I think Trump was the biggest factor in changing the Republican Party from what Ronald Reagan viewed and he wouldn't recognize today." 'We are all on the same team now.' The book, which reportedly draws on an "oral history" that McConnell has been recording for the past 30 years, is apparently replete with anti-Trump barbs that Democrats will likely liberate from context and utilize in the final stretch before Election Day. McConnell told CNN in a statement that despite the anti-Trump venom that lines the pages of the book, things between him and Trump are now copacetic. "Whatever I may have said about President Trump pales in comparison to what JD Vance, Lindsey Graham, and others have said about him, but we are all on the same team now," said McConnell. Prior to endorsing Trump in June, the nominal Republican clearly had plenty to get off his chest. "Unfortunately, about half the Republicans in the country believe whatever [Trump] says," McConnell complained sometime before the end of Trump's first term. "I think I'm pretty safe in saying it's not just the Democrats who are counting the days until he leaves on January 20, but the Republicans as well." In addition to suggesting that Trump should have been impeached, McConnell called the 45th president a "sleazeball" and a "narcissist" and accused him of being "stupid as well as being ill-tempered." According to McConnell, President Donald Trump — who recently overtook Kamala Harris in four national polls and beat the odds in 2016 — has "done a lot of damage to our party's image and our ability to compete." Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) recently accused McConnell of adversely impacting his compatriots' ability to compete, telling BlazeTV host Mark Levin, "McConnell runs the largest Republican super PAC in the country and has $400 million, but that super PAC is used to reward the Republican senators who obey him and to punish those who dare to stand up to him." Cruz, referring to the Senate Leadership Fund, which is run by McConnell's former chief of staff, noted that he had not received a penny from the fund. The McConnell-aligned fundraising group also starved Florida Sen. Rick Scott of funding this cycle. 'The Senate Republican leader is supposed to help Republicans, not undermine them.' Extra to complaining about Trump, McConnell criticized Florida Sen. Rick Scott, who unsuccessfully challenged him in 2022. “I don't think Rick makes a very good victim," said the nominal Republican. "I think he did a poor job of running the [Senate campaign] committee. His plan was used by the Democrats against our candidates as late as the last weekend [before the election]. He promoted the fiction that we were in the middle of a big sweep when there was no tangible evidence of it. And I think his campaign against me was some kind of ill-fated effort to turn the attention away from him and on to somebody else." Scott said earlier this year that McConnell effectively neutralizes Republican voters' representation in the U.S. Senate, lording over one part of a two-person dictatorship. "In the Senate, there's two dictatorships," said Scott. "There's a McConnell dictatorship on the Republican side, and then there's the [Chuck] Schumer dictatorship." McConnell's biography reportedly also highlights the trouble he had with Trump calling his wife, former Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, the senator's "China loving wife, Coco Chow," and details how he wept during the Jan. 6, 2021, protests. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) responded to McConnell's quotes, calling his attacks on Trump and Scott "indefensible." "Those running for Senate GOP leadership posts need to weigh in on this & commit never to sabotage Republican candidates & colleagues — particularly those who are less than two weeks away from a close election," tweeted Lee. "We must have clarity from the candidates running to replace McConnell on where they stand on these attacks. They must be clear on how they plan to lead the conference, and on the role of its members." Lee added that "the Senate Republican leader is supposed to help Republicans, not undermine them. Sadly, we've had too much of the latter." Responding to McConnell's indication that he plans on "arguing more with [Republicans] probably than the Democrats" in the months to come, Blaze News senior editor for politics Christopher Bedford wrote, "McConnell has been at odds with Republican voters for years. He doesn't care, and it's becoming increasingly obvious." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Suffolk Young Democrats Chair Hilariously Claims Women Have to Hide their Votes From Trumpy Men