During a campaign rally in Atlanta, Georgia, 2024 Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris claimed 2024 Republican nominee and former President Donald Trump “intends to cut Social Security and Medicare.” Verdict: Misleading Trump’s official 2024 campaign platform states he will protect Social Security and Medicare. Some experts and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget […]

'More vulnerable than she deserves to be'

Serious question...

'Increasing problems for the Democratic Party'

'charred remains were found inside the walk in oven'

Former independent presidential candidate  Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was terrified to hear of renowned  Dr. Robert Epstein’s study uncovering Google's election interference and censorship. On the Oct. 22 edition of the RFK Podcast, Kennedy learned from Epstein about Alphabet's attempt to influence the upcoming presidential election through its search engine Epstein is widely celebrated for his research involving big tech censorship, influence, and monopolization. Epstein began the conversation by sharing how Google’s homepage disproportionately incentivizes Democrats to vote and warned of the control this gives it. “They’re sending out various kinds of vote reminders—register to vote, mail in your ballot, go vote—to Democrats at about two and a half times they’re doing to Republicans,” he told Kennedy. “Now think about that. Think how that impacts the vote over time, that’s why Google can control so many votes”  Kennedy inquired about methods Google employs to impact the thinking of undecided voters during an election year. Epstein shared the disturbing reality. “The one way they do it is by censorship. In other words, they suppress content and again, you don't know what they don't show,” he said.  Kennedy shared recent research Epstein had exposed to the public from a study done on Google’s bias: “A Google search suggestion can shift undecided voters' opinions from a 50/50 split to almost 90/10, all without user awareness. That is terrifying. That is the end of democracy” Epstein followed this comment by sharing the minimum it could influence voters, stating: “So 4% is the absolute bare minimum that Google alone can shift without anyone knowing.”  This research Epstein and Kennedy cite is directly from his testimony on December 13, 2023, before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights.  MRC released a study on Oct. 15 that put this to the test. The results were disturbing. They displayed Google’s bias as the tech giant buried former President Donald Trump’s campaign website under an array of news stories by leftist outlets. On the contrary, Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign website came first in results, any conservative media did not appear until page eight of the results.  Epstein shifted the conversation to Google’s subsidiary, YouTube, which reaches an audience of over 120 million users daily. “Google has admitted that 70% of the content people watch on YouTube has been recommended by their algorithm,” Epstein said. He then warned about the particular danger it poses to a younger audience, unaware of the attempt to persuade their thinking. Epstein once more made the glaring connection between Google and the Democratic party clear. “These people, by the way, are very determined—Google more than the other companies because Google has a very very strong progressive left culture,” he shared, going on to share the disturbing metrics regarding political donations coming from Google employees. “More than 96% of their donations go from their employees go to Democrats.” Conservatives are under attack! Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on hate speech, and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Earlier this week, leaked documents from Britain’s nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate sparked a massive scandal when it was discovered that the organization’s top priority is to “kill Musk’s Twitter.” In other words, its top priority is to eliminate the only social media platform left that acknowledges free speech. The founder of CCDH, Morgan Sweeney, not only helped install current Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who he now serves under as chief of staff, he also has close ties to the Biden-Harris administration. The Labour Party, which has been destroyed by socialism, even paid to send Sweeney to the DNC this year. The leaked documents also revealed the nonprofit’s intentions to strengthen its ties to America’s Democratic Party. And it certainly seems that’s happening. In addition to the CCDH meeting with U.S. lawmakers to influence legislation regarding platform regulation and censorship, nearly 100 Labour Party staffers are currently in the United States campaigning for Kamala Harris. That certainly seems like foreign election interference. However, it’s “apparently legal here in the United States as long as there’s no money changing hands,” says Glenn Beck. Former U.K. Prime Minister Liz Truss, however, suspects that whatever is going on is far from legal. — (@) “These people who are coming over. Who's paying for their airfare? Who’s paying for their accommodation? Has that been properly accounted for? Have the receipts been produced?” she asks. Under U.S. Federal law, “contributions, donations, expenditures (including independent expenditures) and disbursements solicited, directed, received or made directly or indirectly by or from foreign nationals in connection with any federal, state or local election” are strictly prohibited. England’s Electoral Law states the same — that only British citizens can donate to U.K. campaigns. Truss says that if the situation were reversed and Americans were flown to the U.K. to campaign in a British election, “that would count towards election expenses, and it would be classed as a foreign donation, which is illegal.” To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above.

Depending where you are in the western hemisphere, freedom of speech is either all but gone or it’s precariously hanging in the balance, as governments try to crush the very right that has differentiated the West from other more draconian regions. In America, Elon Musk has become the face of the movement to preserve our First Amendment. As the owner of X, a global company, Musk would like to champion free speech overseas by keeping the X platform free of government censorship. But he’s been met with hostility from would-be totalitarians all over the world who despise him for fighting for the rights of the people. The latest example of this is Great Britain, where leaked plans from the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a British nonprofit, reveal the company’s top priority — “kill Musk’s Twitter.” What’s even more disturbing is the reality that the CCDH has strong ties to Keir Starmer, the current prime minister of the United Kingdom, and the Biden-Harris administration. The founder of the organization, Morgan McSweeney, not only played a major role in Starmer’s rise to power, he also serves as Starmer’s chief of staff. Further, McSweeney is currently meddling in American politics by gunning for Harris and Walz to win the election. The Labour Party even paid for him to attend this year’s DNC. In the United States, McSweeney’s CCDH has been meeting with lawmakers to urge legislation aimed at increasing platform regulation and censorship. Former Prime Minister Liz Truss recently met with Glenn Beck and shared her thoughts on the leaked documents and the overall state of both the U.K. and U.S. — (@) “Our governments are in cahoots doing really bad things to the public,” said Glenn. “There have been numerous public attacks on X by the prime minister. Now, I don't believe that he will succeed if he takes on Elon Musk, but the mentality isn't to have an honest discussion about what's happening in Britain. The mentality is to try and quash any dissent and stop people talking about the very real issues that are affecting us,” said Truss, noting that one of the most glaring issues is “the sheer scale of illegal immigration into [the U.K.].” Truss, who’s been following the U.S. election, says that comments from the likes of Hillary Clinton and other “members of the Democrat campaign” reveal that the United States and England are on the same path. “Not only are [Democrats] putting in place these disastrous policies; they’re also trying to stop anybody from talking about them,” she said. “This is not about left versus right, Democrats versus Republicans. This is about elites against the people,” added Glenn. To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above. Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Less than two weeks from the presidential election, Republicans are breaking turnout records for early voting and mail-in ballots across several key states.In previous election cycles, Democrats have overwhelmingly outperformed Republicans when it comes to voting early. In 2020, over 22 million Democrats voted early, while just 15 million Republicans and nearly 12 million independents did the same. Although more Democrats have voted early, Republicans are actually outperforming them in some crucial swing states.Early voting was notably higher in 2020 due to the pandemic, but the trend remains true for previous election cycles. In 2016, just eight million Republicans voted in advance, as well as nearly 10 million Democrats and five million independents. This time around, Republicans are narrowing the gap. With over 26 million early votes counted, 11 million have been from Democrats, over 10 million have been from Republicans, and nearly five million have been from independents. Historically, the Republican Party has been averse to the idea of early voting. This time around, Trump has made the change to embrace it, and Democrats are beginning to panic. "A few more days like this, though, and the Democratic bedwetting will reach epic proportions," Jon Ralston, CEO of the Nevada Independent, told The Hill about early voting in Clark County, home of Las Vegas. "I think it comes solely down to the fact that last cycle, Donald Trump told Republicans not to vote early, and this time, the party is telling them to vote early," Jon McHenry, a GOP polling analyst and vice president at North Star Opinion Research, told Blaze News. "Pretty simple."Although more Democrats have voted early, Republicans are actually outperforming them in some crucial swing states. In Georgia, 48% of the early votes have been cast by Republicans, while 46% have been from Democrats. Similarly, in Arizona, Republicans are outperforming Democrats 42% to 36%, as well as 40% to 36% in Nevada.The two parties are nearly tied in North Carolina, with 35% of early votes coming from Democrats and 34% from Republicans. “The large mail ballot lead enjoyed by Dems has been erased and more by the GOP lead in in-person early voting,” Ralston told The Hill. While Republicans are making strides in the Sun Belt, Democrats have held onto their lead in the Rust Belt states. In Michigan, 52% of early votes were cast by Democrats, while just 38% came from Republicans. In Pennsylvania, the swing state with the highest electoral vote count, 62% of early votes came from Democrats and 29% came from Republicans. In Wisconsin, 37% of early votes were cast by Democrats and 21% of Republicans did the same. "It doesn't matter a whole lot, whether you get them early or you get them late, as long as they get there," McHenry told Blaze News. "The advantage of getting them early is that you know that they're already banked. You won't have to sweat Election Day quite as much."Notably, nearly half of early votes in Wisconsin and a third of votes in North Carolina came from independents. Roughly a quarter of early votes in Nevada and Arizona also came from independents. Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia have had the lowest independent turnout, bringing in 10%, 9%, and 6%, respectively. "Just because you're registered as a Democrat doesn't mean you voted for Kamala Harris," McHenry told Blaze News. "You might be registered as a Democrat, but you've gotten sick to death of the Democrats over the last four years and just didn't bother to change your registration. You might just vote for Trump." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Vice President Kamala Harris' less-than-stellar performance at her town hall with CNN on Wednesday was filled with awkward answers and nonanswers to basic questions on her stance on several important topics.One such example was when an audience member asked her to name one of her weaknesses.Starting off by saying she would actually consider it to be a strength, Harris said she surrounds herself with a team of people with different viewpoints.'Her habit is to kind of go to word salad city.'"My team will tell you, I am constantly saying, ‘Let‘s kick the tire on that. Let‘s kick the tires on it,’ because, listen, I — as I mentioned earlier, I started my career as a prosecutor. I was a courtroom prosecutor. I‘ve tried everything, from low-level offenses to homicides, and I learned at a very early stage of my career and adult life that my actions have a direct impact on real people in a very fundamental way," Harris explained.Because of that supposed self-awareness, Harris said she oftentimes does not have a quick answer to a question in settings like interviews because she needs to consult with that team."So I may not be quick to have the answer as soon as you ask it about a specific policy issue sometimes because I‘m going to want to research it. I‘m going to want to study it — I‘m kind of a nerd sometimes, I confess — and some might call that a weakness, especially if you‘re, you know, in an interview or just kind of, you know, being asked a certain question and you’re expected to have the right answer right away, but that‘s how I — that‘s how I work," Harris said as she laughed.Word salad answers like that did not impress even longtime Democrats on CNN. Former Obama adviser David Axelrod said, "The thing that would concern me is when she doesn't want to answer a question, her habit is to kind of go to word salad city, and she did that on a couple of answers."CNN host Dana Bash said she had been hearing from Democrats that "if her goal was to close the deal, they're not sure she did that."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!