YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #cosplay #costume #outfit #weatherproof #unique
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
37 w

Here Are the 2024 World Fantasy Award Winners
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Here Are the 2024 World Fantasy Award Winners

News World Fantasy Awards Here Are the 2024 World Fantasy Award Winners By Vanessa Armstrong | Published on October 24, 2024 Comment 0 Share New Share The winners of the 2024 World Fantasy Awards, which are given to works published in 2023, were announced at the World Fantasy Convention that took place last weekend in Niagara Falls, NY. Here are the winners in each category, as reported by Locus magazine. Best Novel WINNER: The Reformatory, Tananarive Due (Saga; Titan UK) The Possibilities, Yael Goldstein-Love (Random House) Starling House, Alix E. Harrow (Tor; Tor UK) Shigidi and the Brass Head of Obalufon, Wole Talabi (DAW; Gollancz) Looking Glass Sound, Catriona Ward (Viper; Nightfire) Witch King, Martha Wells (Tordotcom) Best Novella WINNER: “Half the House Is Haunted,” Josh Malerman (Spin a Black Yarn) The Crane Husband, Kelly Barnhill (Tordotcom) Thornhedge, T. Kingfisher (Tor; Titan UK) “Prince Hat Underground,” Kelly Link (White Cat, Black Dog) A Season of Monstrous Conceptions, Lina Rather (Tordotcom) Mammoths at the Gates, Nghi Vo (Tordotcom) Best Short Fiction WINNER: “Silk and Cotton and Linen and Blood,” Nghi Vo (New Suns 2) “How to Raise a Kraken in Your Bathtub,” P. Djèlí Clark (Uncanny 1-2/23) “Once Upon a Time at The Oakmont,” P. A. Cornell (Fantasy 10/23) “John Hollowback and the Witch,” Amal El-Mohtar (The Book of Witches) “Waystation City,” A. T. Greenblatt (Uncanny 1-2/23) “The Sound of Children Screaming,” Rachael K. Jones (Nightmare 10/23) Best Anthology WINNER: The Book of Witches, Jonathan Strahan, ed. (Harper Voyager US; Harper Voyager UK) Christmas and Other Horrors, Ellen Datlow, ed. (Titan UK) Year’s Best Canadian Fantasy & Science Fiction: Volume One, Stephen Kotowych, ed. (Ansible) The Best American Science Fiction and Fantasy 2023, R.F. Kuang & John Joseph Adams, eds. (Mariner) Out There Screaming: An Anthology of New Black Horror, Jordan Peele & John Joseph Adams, eds. (Random House; Picador) Best Collection WINNER: No One Will Come Back for Us and Other Stories, Premee Mohamed (Undertow) The Essential Peter S. Beagle, Volumes 1 & 2, Peter S. Beagle (Tachyon) The Fortunate Isles, Lisa L. Hannett (Egaeus) White Cat, Black Dog, Kelly Link (Random House; Ad Astra) Jackal, Jackal, Tobi Ogundiran (Undertow) Jewel Box, E. Lily Yu (Erewhon) Best Artist WINNER: Audrey Benjaminsen Rovina Cai Stefan Koidl Charles Vess Alyssa Winans Special Award – Professional WINNER: Liza Groen Trombi, for Locus Bill Campbell, for Rosarium Books E. M. Carroll, for A Guest in the House (First Second) M. John Harrison, for Wish I Was Here: An Anti-Memoir (Serpent’s Tail; Saga; 9/24) Stephen Jones, for The Weird Tales Boys (PS) Special Award – Non-Professional WINNER: Lynne M. Thomas & Michael Damian Thomas, for Uncanny Scott H. Andrews, for Beneath Ceaseless Skies Trevor Kennedy, for Phantasmagoria Brian J. Showers, for Swan River Press Julian Yap & Fran Wilde, for The Sunday Morning Transport [end-mark]  Ginjer Buchanan and Jo Fletcher also received Lifetime Achievement awards, which are given to those who have demonstrated outstanding service to the fantasy field. Congratulations to all the winners and finalists! [end-mark] The post Here Are the 2024 World Fantasy Award Winners appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
37 w

“A gentle, supportive mutiny!” — Star Trek: Lower Decks: “Dos Cerritos” and “Shades of Green”
Favicon 
reactormag.com

“A gentle, supportive mutiny!” — Star Trek: Lower Decks: “Dos Cerritos” and “Shades of Green”

Movies & TV Star Trek: Lower Decks “A gentle, supportive mutiny!” — Star Trek: Lower Decks: “Dos Cerritos” and “Shades of Green” Lower Decks is never better than when it embraces the entirety of the Trek universe—even the goofy parts. By Keith R.A. DeCandido | Published on October 24, 2024 Comment 0 Share New Share One of the common tropes of a long-running serial narrative like Star Trek is that you can do retcons. Short for retroactive continuity, a retcon puts a new spin on an existing bit of lore. Sometimes it’s to reconcile an inconsistency, sometimes it’s to put a new spin on an old story, and sometimes it’s to fix a mistake. (As an example, Strange New Worlds has done a lovely job of retconning the Spock-Chapel relationship in the original series by establishing that they dated in the past.) Lower Decks has already done a certain amount of retconning of the Orion people. Indeed, they’ve given us a retcon of a retcon. When they were introduced way back in “The Cage” in 1964, they were described by Dr. Boyce as “green animal women,” who were there for sex appeal, and who were traded as slaves. Enterprise then retconned Orion women in 2005’s “Bound” as being the real brains of the Orion people, using pheromones to make men stupid in their presence. LD, thankfully, fixed that, making it a bit more nuanced. But there was one appearance of the Orions that had not been taken into account one way or the other: the species’ appearance in the animated episode “The Pirates of Orion.” That animated episode was mostly ignored up until this new fifth season of LD, but this show is never happier than when it’s embracing the entirety of the Trek universe—even the goofy parts. Especially the goofy parts. The animated series was produced by Hal Sutherland, who had issues with colors, which resulted in some entertaining palate choices on the show (e.g., pink tribbles). So the Orions, established in “The Cage” as well as “Whom Gods Destroy” as having green skin, instead had blue skin. In addition, the uniforms they wore were, to say the least, goofy, and also every voice actor was given bad information as to the pronunciation of “Orion.” (Everyone in the episode pronounced it “ORE-ee-un,” rather than “oh-RYE-un.”) The two-episode debut of LD’s fifth and, sadly, final season makes this seeming discontinuity into a plot point. The blue-skinned Orions are one of the many races among the Orion people—which only makes sense, given the variations in pigments among other humanoid species on Trek. They all pronounce their species name “ORE-ee-un,” and they’re proud of their silly outfits. Credit: CBS / Paramount+ The B-plots of each of the two new episodes focus on Tendi, last seen taking a leave of absence from Starfleet in order to fulfill her duties as the Mistress of the Winter Constellations, pirating for her sister D’Erika. And because Tendi is still Starfleet through and through, she tries very hard to be a kinder pirate. In particular, she doesn’t want to kill anyone while plundering. Unfortunately, this gets her in trouble. First the blue Orions are pissed that she’s not following the spirit of pirating in “Dos Cerritos.” That leads to a war between the blue Orions and House Tendi. This pisses off the Orion queen in “Shades of Green,” who says this war is taking time away from proper plundering. So they must do a solar-sail race through a nebula and retrieve a treasure. The winner gets all the loser’s wealth. Tendi once again acts more like a Starfleet officer than a pirate in two critical ways during the race. One is that she accidentally discovers that D’Erika is pregnant. This results in tiresome sitcom nonsense where Tendi tries to keep her sister from doing anything strenuous. The other is more useful: when the Tendi solar ship crashes (because the blue Orions fired on them with rifles), Tendi is able to technobabble a solution. But once again her attempt at compassion—to wit, having both ships come in together in a tie—fails, as the Orion queen doesn’t let them all keep their wealth. Instead, the queen claims both sides’ wealth, leaving them both destitute. Luckily, there’s an out that Tendi is able to provide once she reports back to the Cerritos, D’Erika having decided that she’s paid off her debt. The ship has been assigned to Targalus, which has just joined the Federation and is having a currency-destroying party now that they are enjoying the fruits of the post-scarcity replicator-based economy of the Federation. Credit: CBS / Paramount+ Once again, we get LD looking at the loopier side of Trek, taking things to their absurdist extreme. If a planet is moving to the moneyless economy of the Federation, of course they would celebrate by getting rid of all their money. We see paper money being burned and jewels and such being abandoned. Since the Cerritos was just going to recycle all the jewels and gold anyhow, instead, at Tendi’s suggestion, Freeman donates it to D’Erika, who then can restock House Tendi’s wealth and make them an important family again. Plus it improves relations between the Federation and the Orions… The premiere episode gives us an old Trek standby: the alternate universe story. An attempt to close a quantum fissure leads the Cerritos into a parallel timeline which is just different enough to be weird. Shaxs has long hair, Billups embraces his status as a member of the Hysperian royal family (he wears a coronet and cape over his uniform), Ransom has a mullet, Boimler is bearded and confident, and T’Lyn says “Remarkable” rather than “Fascinating” (which, of course, is literally the only difference between the two). The biggest changes, though, are to Mariner, Rutherford, and Freeman. Mariner has gone back to using her family name of Freeman, and is now the commanding officer, Captain Becky Freeman. As for her mother, she’s apparently been assigned to Starbase 80 (a fate worse than death, as established back in “Terminal Provocations” and seen in “Trusted Sources”). And then there’s poor Rutherford. The mainline version has been neglecting things like personal hygiene and friends, instead throwing himself completely into his work to distract himself from the fact that his best friend is gone. But “Otherford,” as Rutherford calls him, has taken that to an extreme: he’s more cyb than org, as it were, and has shut off all his emotions and erased his memories of Tendi. This proves to be a watershed moment for Rutherford, who doesn’t want to become all Borg… As for Mariner’s counterpart, she proves to be a bigger hardass than her mother ever was, going so far as to whack subordinates with a riding crop if they get out of line. But then we find out that she hates being captain, and pulls a Lore-in-“Datalore” and swaps places with Mariner, hoping to be the carefree junior officer who does what she wants once again. Boimler is particularly taken with his counterpart, and in “Shades of Green,” we see him working on facial hair and doing things he’s found in his counterpart’s service record, pulled from a padd he liberated from the alternate timeline. One of those is “Bointers,” different pointers on how to behave. At first it seems like the ensigns he’s bossing around are not thrilled with this, but they actually are able to use a “Bointer” to save their lives when they’re kidnapped by formerly rich Targalans who don’t want to give up being wealthy and powerful. Credit: CBS / Paramount+ I have to admit to some minor disappointments with “Dos Cerritos.” Usually the fun of these things is to watch the actors play different versions of themselves, but they’re not quite different enough—especially not vocally—for it to matter that much. The exceptions are Gabrielle Ruiz’s T’Lyn, as the fact that she sounds exactly the same is part of the joke, and Tawny Newsome’s Mariner/Freeman, as she’s the most different. Seeing the alternate Cerritos crew flinch around their captain is heartbreaking, and we learn that Mariner is the worst in any timeline, as she goes from being a horrible junior officer to being an incredibly horrible captain. I hope that this results in some changes to Mariner, but her changes to date have been incremental to nonexistent, so I’m not holding my breath. Boimler, on the other hand, has been genuinely developing, his natural talent swimming upstream against his insecurities. It’s especially frustrating to see him go all-in on doing what his counterpart does when it isn’t necessary—but it’s also completely in character. In addition, the banter between Boimler and Mariner has gotten much more fun since Boimler got more confident. It feels more like best-friend banter than the more abusive relationship they had in the first season, and Newsome and Jack Quaid have superlative friendly chemistry. (“Let’s do this!” “Yes, totally—but you are sitting on it backwards.” “Dammit!”) I adored the subplot in “Shades of Green” involving T’Lyn and Rutherford. For one thing, Rutherford is the only one of the “big four” who hadn’t had significant one-on-one scenes with T’Lyn up until now. And it’s heartening to see T’Lyn trying to help Rutherford through his post-Tendi funk, first by encouraging him to work on the shuttlecraft that he and Tendi had been repairing. Once she discovers that he’d been avoiding working on it because it was his and Tendi’s project, T’Lyn proceeds to completely demolish the shuttlecraft so the pair of them can continue to work on it. It’s incredibly adorable. After a really rocky first season, LD has settled into an absolute delight of a Trek show, mostly because it’s embraced its most successful version of itself: a Star Trek comedy, rather than a twenty-first-century office comedy with Trek bits. It’s still very much a Trek show in all the most important ways: the themes of both these episodes are to not be mean to other people and to be the best version of yourself. I’m gonna be sorry to see it go, and Paramount+ should be ashamed of themselves for cancelling it. Random thoughts I was really worried about “Shades of Green” from the title, which feels like a riff on “Shades of Grey,” the nadir of The Next Generation as a TV show. Luckily, this wasn’t a clip show like that 1989 TNG disaster, but rather a descriptive title, since so much of the episode is about the green-skinned Orions versus the blue-skinned ones. “Dos Cerritos” opens with a delightful heist sequence, as Tendi goes undercover on a ship run by someone of the same species as Palor Toff, the character played by Nehemiah Persoff in TNG’s “The Most Toys.” At one point, one of the Orions wants to tear out the twisty metal band that runs from ear to nose, with the poor alien crying in protest that “it’s prescription!” which is hilarious. The quantum fissure seen in “Dos Cerritos” is very much like the one that started the plot going in TNG’s “Parallels,” one of Trek’s better alternate-timeline episodes. Other examples of alternate-timeline versions of familiar characters include the original series’ “Mirror, Mirror,” TNG’s “Yesterday’s Enterprise,” DS9’s “Crossover,” “Through the Looking Glass,” “Shattered Mirror,” “Resurrection,” and “The Emperor’s New Cloak,” Voyager’s “Living Witness” (sort of), Enterprise’s “In a Mirror, Darkly” two-parter, Discovery’s “Into the Forest I Go,” “Despite Yourself,” “The Wolf Inside,” “Vaulting Ambition,” “What’s Past is Prologue,” and the “Terra Firma” two parter, Picard’s “Penance,” and Prodigy’s “Cracked Mirror.” For those who might think it silly that some Orions pronounce it “ORE-ee-un” rather than “oh-RYE-un,” I present as evidence my mother’s side of the family. The branch of the Andreassi family that is in the New York Metropolitan Area pronounce it “an-dree-AH-see,” while the branch of the same family that is in western Pennsylvania pronounce it “an-DRESS-ee.” Mind you, this drove my paternal grandfather crazy whenever he visited family in Pennsylvania, though it was on one of those trips that he met my grandmother, so he probably got over it…[end-mark] The post “A gentle, supportive mutiny!” — <i>Star Trek: Lower Decks</i>: “Dos Cerritos” and “Shades of Green” appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
37 w

Good Omens Season 3 Will Only Be 90 Minutes Long
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Good Omens Season 3 Will Only Be 90 Minutes Long

News Good Omens 3 Good Omens Season 3 Will Only Be 90 Minutes Long By Vanessa Armstrong | Published on October 24, 2024 Credit: Prime Video Comment 0 Share New Share Credit: Prime Video The third season of Good Omens will now be one 90-minute episode, according to Variety. The show was greenlit for a full third and final season in December 2023, and production was underway. Work was put on hold this September, however, when several women publicly accused showrunner Neil Gaiman of sexual assault. Good Omens, which is based on the novel by Gaiman and Terry Pratchett, centers on the angel Aziraphale (Michael Sheen) and the demon Crowley (David Tennant) who form an ineffable, loving relationship despite being from opposite celestial sides. While the two kissed in the Season Two finale, they parted on less-than-stellar terms after Aziraphale accepted a top-tier job in Heaven. Season Three of the series was meant to follow a sequel story created by the Good Omens co-authors before Pratchett passed away in 2015. According to Variety, Gaiman “had contributed to the writing of the series finale, but he will not be working on the show once production resumes.” He will also not be listed as an executive producer on the upcoming final episode. Production is scheduled to start up again in 2025 in Scotland, though there’s no news yet on when the one-episode third season will make its way to Prime Video. [end-mark] The post <i>Good Omens</i> Season 3 Will Only Be 90 Minutes Long appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
37 w

The DOJ Is Wrong: Federal Law Doesn’t Prevent States From Removing Aliens From Voter Rolls
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

The DOJ Is Wrong: Federal Law Doesn’t Prevent States From Removing Aliens From Voter Rolls

The Biden-Harris Justice Department is wrong in claiming that federal law bars Virginia and other states from removing aliens from their voter rolls. And if the law DOJ cites is misinterpreted by a court to agree with the agency’s erroneous claim, then the law likely would be unconstitutional. The Justice Department sued Virginia after it removed the names of 6,303 aliens and Alabama after it moved 3,251 aliens to an “inactive” list. Keep in mind that it’s a felony under several federal statutes for an alien to claim fraudulently to be a citizen so he or she may register to vote or vote in U.S. elections, including 18 U.S.C. §§ 611, 911, and 1015(f). The Justice Department has a duty to enforce these statutes, something the agency apparently has no interest in doing under President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. The federal voter registration form established by the National Voter Registration Act, or NVRA, not only asks applicants whether they are U.S. citizens, it requires them to attest under penalty of perjury that they are citizens. The form has a strict warning that if the would-be voter provides false information, he or she may “be fined, imprisoned, or (if not a U.S. citizen) deported from or refused entry to the United States.” However, the Justice Department claims that Virginia and Alabama violated the law’s 90-day preelection deadline for “systematic” list maintenance programs. This, according to the DOJ led by Attorney General Merrick Garland, prevents all “systematic” removals from a voter registration list within 90 days of an election. What the Justice Department fails to point out is that the 90-day deadline is in the second part of a section of the National Voter Registration Act that deals only with the removal of the names of registered voters who have moved.  The first part outlines the rule for removing the names of individuals who have moved to a different residence either within the state or another state. The second part then applies the 90-day deadline for such removals. That section of the law also says that the deadline doesn’t apply to “correction of registration records” or to removal of names of voters who have requested it or who have died or become ineligible due to a criminal conviction or mental incapacity.  The common factor in all of those exceptions is that each deals with individuals who were eligible to vote when they registered but subsequently became ineligible.  The 90-day deadline obviously doesn’t apply to an alien who wasn’t eligible to register to vote in the first place and, in fact, was committing a felony violation of federal criminal law by registering.  Critics, including the Justice Department, have claimed that those exceptions are the “exclusive” reasons that a state may remove the names of registered individuals from the voter rolls. In 2012, in Arcia v. Detzner, a federal case out of the Southern District of Florida, Judge William Zloch said that claim would “produce an absurd result.” Zloch ruled that would mean a state couldn’t “remove from its voting rolls minors, fictitious individuals, individuals who misrepresent their residence in the state, and non-citizens.”  The 90-day deadline, the judge decided, “simply does not apply to an improperly registered noncitizen.” In another 2012 federal case, U.S. v. Florida, Judge Robert Hinkle of the Northern District of Florida concluded that Congress drafted these provisions of the law to deal with the removal of names of registered voters “on grounds that typically arise after an initial proper registration.” The provisions don’t apply to “revocation of an improperly granted registration of a noncitizen,” Hinkle ruled. In fact, the judge wrote, “the NVRA does not require a state to allow a noncitizen to vote just because the state did not catch the error more than 90 days in advance.” Moreover, the Justice Department is also wrong in claiming that the law bars all “systematic” removals of voters’ names.  As Hinkle ruled, during the 90-day period “a state may pursue a program to systematically remove registrants on request or based on a criminal conviction, mental incapacity, or death but not based on a change of residence.”  What “matters here,” the federal judge added, “is this: none of this applies to removing noncitizens who were never properly registered in the first place.”  It is true that in a deeply flawed, cursory analysis, a divided panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the Southern District of Florida decision and held that the 90-day deadline did apply to the removal of aliens’ names from voter rolls.  But Florida didn’t appeal this obviously wrong decision by two appeals court judges to the entire 11th Circuit or to the Supreme Court. The 11th Circuit panel’s decision not only is wrong based on the text of the statute, but any interpretation of the National Voter Registration Act that would force a state to allow an ineligible alien who violated criminal law by registering to remain registered so he may cast a ballot in an upcoming election likely would render the law unconstitutional. In 2019, in Bellitto v. Snipes, another case arising out of Florida, a different 11th Circuit panel held that in applying the NVRA, “Congress would not have mandated that the state register” an individual who “is not eligible to vote.” If the NVRA does not require a state to register an ineligible alien to vote, it cannot be construed to require a state to maintain and continue the registration of an ineligible alien. Alabama and Virginia should fight the Justice Department and be willing to take these cases all the way to the Supreme Court. Maintaining the security and integrity of the American election process and protecting voters against foreign interference that voids their votes requires no less. Read Hans von Spakovsky’s complete Legal Memorandum: “The National Voter Registration Act Does Not Prevent States From Removing Aliens from Voter Registration Rolls at Any Time.” The post The DOJ Is Wrong: Federal Law Doesn’t Prevent States From Removing Aliens From Voter Rolls appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
37 w

Why Trump at McDonald’s Matters
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Why Trump at McDonald’s Matters

This week, Donald Trump set the political world afire with an appearance at a McDonald’s in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. There, he donned the famous McDonald’s apron, cooked up some fries and served customers at a drive-thru window. All the while, he looked like he was enjoying himself thoroughly—which he certainly was. Trump has the momentum, and he knows it. But it’s more than that. Whatever Trump’s other failings, at his root, Trump likes people. And not just people of his class or who share his background. He likes dealing with human beings. Two weeks ago, I had the opportunity to commemorate Oct. 7 with Trump, where he met with the family of an American hostage held by Hamas in Gaza. Trump connected with them on an emotional level. Whether it’s Jewish Americans from New Jersey dealing with the horror and tragedy of having their son held by the world’s most vicious terrorist group or Pennsylvania voters who just want to meet Trump and pick up a Happy Meal, Trump is comfortable with his fellow Americans because he’s unapologetically what he is. That’s simply not true of Kamala Harris. Off-script, Harris remains a disaster. Her “60 Minutes” interview with Bill Whitaker was filled with word slaw, spin, and platitudinous drivel. Her Fox News interview with Bret Baier flew completely off the rails, with Harris unable to defend even the most basic decisions by the Biden administration. She took time off the campaign trail to prepare for an NBC News interview as well as a CNN town hall—events that, for a normal candidate, would require zero prep time in a hotel conference room. Then again, this is the same woman whose staff had to hold a “mock dinner” to prepare her for a dinner with Washington journalists and newsmakers. Axios reported, “Harris aides even considered including wine in the mock prep so Harris could practice with a glass or two.” What’s more, Harris seems to be a permanent resident of the uncanny valley. She does a mildly credible job of appearing warm and human … but only just. Her interactions always reek of the staged and the manipulated. Every move is calculated—and transparently so. Twelve-time Best Actress nominee Katharine Hepburn once reportedly described Meryl Streep’s acting as too mechanical: “Click, click, click,” she reportedly told biographer Scott Berg, “referring to the wheels turning inside (Streep’s) head.” That’s Harris with actual, real human beings. And it shows. Which is why the media have gone apoplectic about Trump’s McDonald’s visit. Trump’s critics pointed out that the McDonald’s was actually formally closed for his visit and claimed that the event was “staged”—a peculiar critique, given that Trump has been the victim of two assassination attempts, and presidential campaigns require places of business to be secured before candidates enter. The critics even went so far as to attack the local franchise for its health record years ago. The desperation comes from an obvious place: This was a Trump win. (Screenshots: Facebook) And it was a Trump win because Trump wasn’t pretending. He didn’t don jeans and a T-shirt in order to cosplay as one of the boys, Tim Walz-style. Instead, he showed up in his traditional suit, put on an apron, and started handing out fries and chitchatting with the customers. It was a moment of authenticity, and it showed as such, compared with the polyester joy presented by the Harris campaign. Harris can’t shake the fundamental reality that she has been, for decades, a highly stylized political product. Kamala 1.0 was a progressive prosecutor; Kamala 2.0 was a hard-charging prosecutor; Kamala 3.0 was the furthest left member of the U.S. Senate; Kamala 4.0 was a moderate. And Kamala 5.0 is whatever she needs to be at any given moment. But what she truly needs to be is human. And that’s the problem: She isn’t. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Why Trump at McDonald’s Matters appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
37 w

Child Services Dept Working With Biden-Harris Admin Tracked ‘Trans Kids’ on Secret Database
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Child Services Dept Working With Biden-Harris Admin Tracked ‘Trans Kids’ on Secret Database

DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION—An Ohio child welfare agency created a “confidential spreadsheet” tracking the sexual orientation and transgender identity of children as young as 5, according to a document exclusively obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The Cuyahoga County Division of Children and Family Services created a database tracking the sexual orientation, transgender identity, and pronouns of children who interacted with the child welfare system in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, featuring entries dated from March 2018 to the most recent entry in August 2024. The spreadsheet was part of its “Safe Identification” program, which teaches social services staff how to collect information about the sexuality and gender identity of children. In 2017, Cuyahoga County DCFS was one of four social services agencies nationwide chosen to research, develop, and evaluate transgender ideology-based child welfare interventions that suggest parents and caregivers who do not affirm a child’s sexual orientation or gender confusion are unsafe and may need to have their children removed from their home. Members of the Biden-Harris administration called the Cuyahoga County group “trailblazers” and wanted to nationalize their model. The Cuyahoga County DCFS team influenced the recently finalized Biden-Harris rule, which requires child welfare systems to validate and support gender confusion. On the confidential spreadsheet, Cuyahoga County DCFS staff detailed how they helped children obtain sex-change drugs, purchased a chest binder for a “nonbinary” child, and noted at least one tracked child was 5 years old. The document tracked if children were “transgender or gender diverse,” labeling them as pansexual, bisexual, gay, lesbian, straight, or “questioning” their sexual orientation. One entry for a boy listed as gay said: “Youth says his gay b/c his peers told him so.” A section of the “confidential spreadsheet” used by Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services. Nearly half the children in the confidential spreadsheet were listed as living outside of the foster care system in their “own home” with their parents. The spreadsheet notes if parents are “accepting” or “rejecting” of their child’s gender confusion. Some transgender activists view rejecting a child’s gender confusion, such as not letting a child cross-dress, as an act of abuse or neglect. The spreadsheet was one of hundreds of documents reviewed during the Daily Caller News Foundation’s investigation into the federally funded transformation of the child welfare system into that which rejects a male-female understanding of sex and instead teaches social workers, children, and families to proactively “affirm,” meaning to validate, support, and embrace gender ideology. ‘Very Appreciated’ Emails obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation show Cuyahoga County DCFS worked closely with the Biden-Harris administration to influence and “imbed” their work into new federal regulations requiring child welfare systems to validate the gender confusion of children.  Julie Kruse, a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services senior adviser, called the Cuyahoga County DCFS “trailblazers” for “creating better services and outcomes for LGBTQIA2S+ children and families in child welfare,” saying their work was “very appreciated” by the Biden-Harris administration. “Thank you so much for all you do in being trailblazers to creating better services and outcomes for LGBTQIA2S+ children and families in child welfare, you are very appreciated at ACF,” wrote Kruse. “I would really love ACF leadership to see first hand what it looks like when folks address the challenges LGBTQIA2S+ youth face in care, and deal with the hard issues – data collection, organizational culture, etc. etc.” The research was funded by a $10 million federal grant awarded to the University of Maryland School of Social Work from the Children‘s Bureau, an agency within HHS. The grant funded the creation of a research group cumbersomely named National Quality Improvement Center on Tailored Services, Placement Stability, and Permanency for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, and Two-Spirit Children and Youth (QIC-LGBTQ2S) in Foster Care.  The QIC-LGBTQ2S sought to systemically transform child welfare systems by teaching social workers, children, and families to reject a male-female view of sex and proactively “affirm”—meaning to validate, support, and embrace—the gender confusion of children. Ways parents and staff can be LGBTQ “affirming” include using preferred pronouns, taking children to LGBTQ events, and supporting their desired sex change. The Daily Caller News Foundation has written an in-depth report on the research interventions developed by the QIC-LGBTQ2S, which are being pushed by the Biden-Harris administration. Kruse did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s requests for comment. A press secretary for the Administration for Children and Families declined to comment. ‘Child Is 5’ In the spreadsheet, the Cuyahoga County DFCS staff noted if children had LGTBQ “affirming” parents or needed assistance to obtain sex-change medications. For example, one entry about a 5-year-old labeled as “transgender or gender diverse” reads: “Child is 5 y/o and has recently come out to the family. The family accept her and are reportedly supportive.” Another entry notes: “Request for hormones submitted to Dr. to send in prior authorization to insurance. DCFS Director signed.” The spreadsheet does not list the child’s age. One entry describes how the agency bought a chest binder, a garment that flattens female breasts, for a “nonbinary” girl living with her parents. “Youth is binding, new binders purchased by DCFS as old one broke. Youth is fluid in gender at times,” reads the spreadsheet. Other notes describe a child engaged in a polyamorous relationship, having more than a single partner at a time, and another entry even notes a child identifies as a “furry”—a person who identifies as an animal. There are also columns to track if parents are engaging in services aimed at training them to validate and support their child’s chosen sexual orientation or transgender identity. The most recent entry on the spreadsheet is dated Aug. 4. ‘Safe Identification’ The confidential spreadsheet was a part of the AFFIRM.ME program developed by Cuyahoga County DCFS through the QIC-LGBTQ2S research grant. The AFFIRM.ME program is a practice model that provides a road map for child welfare systems to undergo a systemic transformation through a series of social services interventions that teach staff, youth, and parents to be LGBTQ-affirming. As previously reported, these interventions include programs that train “non-affirming” parents to validate their child’s gender confusion and assist in finding children a “chosen affirming” family if their parents are not LGBTQ-affirming. Part of the AFFIRM.ME program is called Safe Identification, an intervention that proactively seeks to identify any LGBTQ youth that encounters the child welfare system, including those living outside of the foster care, and trains social workers to collect their sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression (SOGIE) data. In April 2022, Cuyahoga County adopted a policy requiring all DCFS staff to collect SOGIE data from youth ages 13 and older using their SOGIE Disclosure and Safe Identification forms. The policy states: “Cuyahoga County DCFS believes that all youth involved with the agency have the right to live in an environment that is both physically and emotionally safe. Youth in their own homes or in substitute care deserve to reside with affirming caregivers and other household members. We can help ensure this by safely identifying LGBTQ2S + youth and understanding their individual needs.” The SOGIE Disclosure form specifies that staff members can have a gender identity conversation with children as young as 3 if they “are very aware of their gender.” According to a 2022 report on the AFFIRM.ME program, the Safe Identification intervention was originally meant for use for youth ages 12-21 who were in the care of the state. However, the report notes the “age range was later changed to 5–21 years old to account for younger children disclosing diverse gender identity or expression and to include youth involved with DCFS, not just those in the care of DCFS.” It also notes that approximately 10% of all identified youth were under age 12. This was seen as a “positive change” as it created an opportunity to “provide services to families and youth not in agency care in an effort to keep them from entering agency custody,” according to the report. Ohio state Rep. Gary Click, who sponsored an Ohio bill banning pediatric sex change, disagrees that the AFFIRM.ME program is creating a “positive change” in Ohio. “The policies of the Cuyahoga County DCFS are the ultimate in government grooming practices and must stop immediately—their ‘Affirm.Me’ program goes far beyond the role of government to ensure the safety of children and serves only to indoctrinate and discriminate against families whose values differ from their official government mandate,” Click told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Additionally, their belittling, discrimination, and attempted reprogramming of people of faith is hideous, un-American, and very likely unconstitutional,” Click said. “The Legislature will not sit idly by while local government attempts to usurp the role of the family.” Cuyahoga County Department of Child and Family Services SOGIE Disclosure form. ‘Emotional Harm’ “Emotional harm” is included in the Federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act definition of child abuse and neglect. Some transgender activists believe that rejecting a child’s gender confusion, such as refusing to use a child’s chosen name or pronouns, causes emotional harm and is a form of abuse and neglect. During an HHS webinar filmed last fall, one LGBTQ activist stated “transphobia is child abuse,” comparing it to denying a child food or access to school, the Daily Caller News Foundation previously reported. If a community member believes a parent is causing a child “emotional harm” by refusing to “affirm” their gender confusion, they could call the Child Protective Services Hotline and report suspected child abuse or neglect. In Ohio, after a report of suspected abuse or neglect is made, a CPS investigator will interview the child and family and determine if the child is being abused or is at risk for abuse. Then, they may refer the case to additional social services or criminal court, according to the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services website. Erin Friday, a California attorney and co-founder of the parent group Our Duty, whose mission is to protect children from the harms of pediatric sex changes, told the Daily Caller News Foundation it’s difficult for parents to fight accusations of emotional harm in court. “A problem with emotional stress accusations is there is wide latitude or discretion at the trial court level,” Friday said. “So when a judge says ‘Yes, you’ve been emotionally abusive,’ it is very hard to appeal that because they have wide discretion.” “Parents are losing custody of their children over a name and a pronoun. That should scare parents,” Friday added. Friday submitted an amicus brief in the upcoming Supreme Court case United States v. Skrmetti, which could determine the future of pediatric sex changes in America. Friday told the Daily Caller News Foundation the outcome of this case will have long-lasting reverberations for the child welfare system. “The basis of my brief was if Tennessee or if the Supreme Court finds that there is a discrete group called transgender kids, then every parent in the United States, every single one, who doesn’t affirm their child is at risk of losing custody of their child,” said Friday. “Because it becomes de facto lifesaving, de facto standard of care. And so, it’s massively important that we win this case,” Friday said. In the brief, Friday described the potential consequences for parents who refuse to affirm their child’s gender confusion if pediatric sex change is “deemed a constitutional right, in children’s best interests, or medically necessary.” “Parents in custody disputes who refuse medical intervention may not be granted custody of gender dysphoric children, and non-affirming parents could be adjudicated emotionally abusive or medically negligent,” reads Friday’s brief. ‘We Have a Form’ The investigation of a child and family after a report of abuse or neglect provides Cuyahoga County DCFS staff members the opportunity to collect the SOGIE data of a child using their SOGIE Disclosure form. The form states that the conversation about the child’s sexual identity “should be done in a private setting,” emphasizing that keeping the disclosed information private is “utmost importance to the Division of Children and Family Services.” It further specifies that any information shared by the youth will not be disclosed to anyone else, which would include their parents, unless there is a safety concern. Included on the SOGIE Disclosure form is a script that recommends social workers introduce themselves using their preferred pronouns, ask the child if they feel like a girl, boy, or “something in between,” and find out who the child has crushes on. If a Cuyahoga County DCFS staff member discovers a child has a “diverse SOGIE,” which the SOGIE Disclosure form defines as “anything other than heterosexual, male or female,” the staff member fills out a Safe Identification form that asks the child if their parents or caregiver affirm their sexual or gender identity. A Safe Identification form used by the Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services. DFCS staff are instructed to send the Safe Identification form to Kori Sewell, a social services supervisor at Cuyahoga County Health and Human Services, who inputs the information into a secret database. Sewell previously said on a podcast that only she and her colleague could access the confidential spreadsheet. “We have a form that we have staff fill out when they have a young person who identifies as LGBTQ. That form then comes to me, and I start logging that information into the confidential spreadsheet,” said Sewell on the podcast. Sewell explained how the Safe Identification process helps them identify non-affirming parents and refer them to courses aimed at convincing them to accept their child’s gender dysphoria, if needed. “I have a conversation with the staff around what the needs of the family are, what the dynamics are, we call that our triage, so that we can triage the case to see if it may qualify for a service,” said Sewell. “We had Chosen Affirming Family Finding and The Youth Acceptance Project. Those two services were available to families that we were working with here at the agency, and so part of the triage process was to see if those families qualified for one of those services,” Sewell continued. Chosen Affirming Family Finding is a social services intervention that places LGBTQ kids with “affirming” caregivers. The Youth Acceptance Project works to reeducate non-affirming parents to validate their child’s LGBTQ identity and avoid having them removed from their care. The confidential spreadsheet contained several columns indicating if caregivers were engaged in “YAP” services. The Daily Caller News Foundation obtained a series of communications showing the Cuyahoga County DCFS team working with HHS officials from May 2023 to October 2023, providing input on how interventions like Safe Identification could be implemented at the federal level. Sewell did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s requests for comment. ‘Insightful Meeting’ Emails indicate Kruse, the senior adviser for LGBTQI+ Initiatives in the Biden-Harris administration, had an “insightful meeting” meeting the Cuyahoga County DCFS team on June 9, 2023, which led to a July 7 call with the then-assistant secretary for the Administration for Children and Families. In preparation for this call, Kruse sent the Cuyahoga County DCFS team a series of questions it should be prepared to answer, asking how its programs assure “transgender and nonbinary children” have access to binders and pediatric sex-change medical interventions. Kruse also asked how its data collection model was tied to providing “affirming” services. The Cuyahoga County team put together a presentation agenda for the HHS call, which indicated it would explain why its program was “a promising model for replication” with “safe ID as foundation,” according to an agenda obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. After the call, the Cuyahoga County team thanked HHS for considering how to “imbed” their “lifesaving” work into policy. The Cuyahoga County DCFS did not provide the Daily Caller News Foundation with a comment. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation The post Child Services Dept Working With Biden-Harris Admin Tracked ‘Trans Kids’ on Secret Database appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
37 w

Pennsylvania Faces Scrutiny Over Secretive Partnership with CISA Amid Free Speech Concerns
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

Pennsylvania Faces Scrutiny Over Secretive Partnership with CISA Amid Free Speech Concerns

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Amid concerns raised over possible incursions on free speech, The Federalist’s appeal for a more transparent look into the Pennsylvania Department of State’s partnership with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), has been met with significant resistance. The State Department has declined to relinquish pertinent documents and correspondence linked to its collaboration with the agency, which has previously been implicated in operations suppressing free expression. The Federalist had discovered the state’s partnership with CISA, the pro-censorship government organization, a move purposed to counter threats jeopardizing elections, to include what is being deemed as “misinformation.” However, repeated attempts to derive a clearer understanding of what this partnership entails through Pennsylvania’s Right To Know Request (RTKR) have been largely unmet. The Federalist, chastising the state for being reticent with important details, highlights that the specifics of the “intelligence” shared among government agencies involved, as well as the usage of such information, remain obscure. Such omissions were demonstrated in an email from Secretary of State Al Schmidt to a group, including CISA affiliates, discussing efforts to enhance “information sharing.” The opaque nature of the state’s interaction with the agency carried over into protracted delays in furnishing the requested material. Having been informed it would require more than a month to conduct the necessary investigations, the state asked The Federalist to wait a fortnight more for it to sift through pertinent records. The Federalist complied, but following the approval of the extension, was subjected to a string of promises of imminent responses and subsequent extensions, which culminated in finally receiving a response on October 21. However, the information ultimately dispatched skirted over the core issue, as The Federalist was merely granted access to uncomplicated email correspondence related to planning meetings and events, relevant webinar overviews and conveyed well-wishes for a CISA agent’s recovery following a leg injury. Valuable insight into the state’s functioning with the government censorship hub remained unearthed as they were withheld under the justification of their contribution to “internal, predecisional deliberations” or potential security risks if made public. The Federalist has lodged an appeal against the state’s decision to keep critical information under wraps, unearthing a similar pattern with House Judiciary Chairman, Jim Jordan. He had earlier in the year pointed out that CISA had failed to meet their subpoena obligations over similar concerns relating to the dubious partnership. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Pennsylvania Faces Scrutiny Over Secretive Partnership with CISA Amid Free Speech Concerns appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
37 w

Facial Recognition in Retail: Privacy Concerns Loom as Kroger Tracks Shoppers
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

Facial Recognition in Retail: Privacy Concerns Loom as Kroger Tracks Shoppers

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Facial recognition – in the service of price gouging? While both would be serious problems, framing the first as mostly “problematic” in terms of the other looks truly like an example of “burying the lede.” The “lede” concerning facial recognition tech deployed (or planned to be deployed) in places frequented by huge amounts of people such as retail chains like Kroger in the US is – number one (two, and three) – mass surveillance and possible (if not likely) short, mid, and long-term consequences on by and large unsuspecting shoppers’ digital security and privacy. And that means everyone’s privacy, security – and constitutional rights. Yet, here we have one of the supposedly “most progressive” US House of Representative Democrats – Rashida Tlaib – complaining about Kroger’s facial recognition as a tool for surge pricing, not least, according to her, in the context of “studies (that have) shown that facial recognition is flawed and can lead to discrimination in predominantly Black and brown communities.” We obtained a copy of the letter for you here. It might also be a (clever, or otherwise) intent to keep the focus away from the inflation that’s plagued the US, and affected the general standard of living these last years. Kroger did itself no favors by teaming up with Microsoft and its cameras to use EDGE (Enhanced Display for Grocery Environment) “smart shelves,” as well as Electronic Shelf Labels (ESLs), which are supposed to enable “dynamic price adjustments” and in this way harvest customer data – such as gender and age. The real story here seems to be a major retail chain monitoring you for those two major personal data points, as you shop, period. But Congresswoman Tlaib is building on an August letter by fellow Democrats Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bob Casey who were worried about the “potential misuse” of the tech – the existence of this technology in stores in the first place is already misuse, many critics would say. Many politicians refuse to address the core issue. Kroger’s response claims it, “(…) does not and has never engaged in ‘surge pricing’. Any test of electronic shelf tags is designed to lower prices for more customers where it matters most. To suggest otherwise is not true.” If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Facial Recognition in Retail: Privacy Concerns Loom as Kroger Tracks Shoppers appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
37 w

Ireland Unveils EU-Wide Online Safety Code with Strict Censorship, Online Digital ID Verification, and Fines for Big Tech
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

Ireland Unveils EU-Wide Online Safety Code with Strict Censorship, Online Digital ID Verification, and Fines for Big Tech

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Ireland is about to start implementing its Online Safety Code in November, with full implementation expected by the middle of next year. The country’s media regulator (Coimisiún na Meán) is behind these rules that apply in all 27 EU member countries as that concerns online platforms that have their headquarters in Ireland. The highlight of the Code is the ban on uploading and sharing a wide range of content, both user-generated (“third-party”) and commercial, in case the document defines the content as “harmful” – even in instances where it is actually not illegal under either Irish or EU law. Critics are referring to this kind of approach as the authorities acting without “any democratic mandate,” but that doesn’t seem to bother them; instead, the highly controversial age verification has also found its way to this seemingly “para-democratic” move that does not need to be approved by Ireland’s parliament. The age verification requirement has to do with platforms considered to permit “pornography and extreme or gratuitous violence” – and that could affect Meta’s Facebook and Instagram, X, Microsoft’s LinkedIn, Google’s YouTube, TikTok, Pinterest, Tumblr, etc., and all their users. The Irish regulator has decided to use the “money stick” as the main instrument to ensure compliance. Thus any platform that is found to be non-compliant will be ordered to pay the equivalent of some $21.6 million in fines. Alternatively, the figure will be 10 percent of the company’s global annual turnover – whichever is higher. Video platforms will reportedly come under stricter scrutiny under the Online Safety Code, and will have to include the Irish regulator-mandated provision into their terms of service, banning uploading “restricted video content” – as that is described in the Code. Ireland will be able to impose its new rules everywhere in the EU thanks to the EU’s own Audiovisual Media Services Directive 2018. For now, “disinformation” is not a part of what the Irish regulator seeks to ban and fine, but reports say that its representatives made a note of the fact they could “make a proposal that a particular type of content should be added to the categories of harmful content.” That proposal would then be considered by the country’s cabinet minister in charge of the media portfolio. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Ireland Unveils EU-Wide Online Safety Code with Strict Censorship, Online Digital ID Verification, and Fines for Big Tech appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
37 w

Polls Show Prop 36 is Going to Pass Easily in California
Favicon 
hotair.com

Polls Show Prop 36 is Going to Pass Easily in California

Polls Show Prop 36 is Going to Pass Easily in California
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 6846 out of 56666
  • 6842
  • 6843
  • 6844
  • 6845
  • 6846
  • 6847
  • 6848
  • 6849
  • 6850
  • 6851
  • 6852
  • 6853
  • 6854
  • 6855
  • 6856
  • 6857
  • 6858
  • 6859
  • 6860
  • 6861

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund