We all remember that Election Night four years ago actually lasted a lot longer than one night. It stretched on for several days. And with each hour that passed — particularly in the overnight hours — Donald Trump’s lead slowly trickled away, until finally, the media declared Joe Biden had emerged victorious. What followed was widespread suspicion of election fraud, January 6, a lot of lawsuits, and so on. Whatever you think of the results themselves, this was a clear failure of our government. Their job is to ensure that elections are beyond reproach. The appearance of fairness is almost as important as actual fairness and that clearly didn’t happen four years ago. To quell the outrage that unfolded after the race was called for Joe Biden, Democrats came up with an explanation for what had occurred. They stated it was completely foreseeable that Donald Trump’s lead would dissipate, then vanish over several days. And the reason they said it made sense is that, in key states like Pennsylvania, all of the votes weren’t counted on Election Day. They told us that, as counties east of the Appalachian Mountains reported their results, it was only natural for Joe Biden’s lead to continue to grow. Democrats said there was no cause for alarm here, because when you look at the demographics of the late-reporting counties, it all makes sense. Those counties included cities like Philadelphia and Atlanta, which have very large black populations. And black voters, in every presidential election in memory, have always turned out in very large numbers for the Democrat. Therefore, they said, there’s nothing to see here. There’s no fraud. This is the expected result. That’s the excuse they went with, and a lot of Republicans bought it. As we head into the final days of the 2024 presidential election, it’s becoming clear this excuse probably won’t work this time around. They won’t be able to say, with a straight face, that late-reporting counties in majority-black areas all broke for Kamala Harris by 90% at the last minute. That’s because Kamala Harris’ support among black voters, according to every major poll, is collapsing. Everyone admits this is happening — even CNN. Watch: To be as fair as possible to Kamala Harris, her support is dropping among a lot of demographic groups. It’s not just black voters. The New York Times just reported: Vice President Kamala Harris’s support among Hispanic voters is in dangerously low territory for Democrats … More than one-third of Hispanic voters say they support both building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and deporting immigrants who are living in the United States illegally. But interestingly enough, you’ll notice that the Harris campaign isn’t going on the offensive against Hispanics. They’re not lecturing Hispanics about how they’re racists and misogynists. CNN isn’t freaking out either. Instead, the Kamala Harris campaign, their surrogates, and their allies in the media, have all united to go after black voters specifically. This has been going on for some time now. A few weeks ago, I talked about Barack Obama’s literal finger-wag at black men. He showed up at Kamala Harris’ campaign headquarters and told black voters that, if they’re hesitating about supporting Kamala Harris, then they probably hate women. Here’s part of what he said, one more time: This is the kind of outburst that, if you’re being charitable, you might chalk up to a bad day. Maybe the kite-surfing wasn’t great on Martha’s Vineyard that day, and so Barack Obama decided to go off-script and take out his frustrations on insolent black voters who won’t do what he commands them to do. Certainly, if you’re a Kamala Harris supporter, that’s the best-case scenario. The worst-case scenario is that Barack Obama was delivering the campaign’s well-rehearsed, scripted closing argument — which is that if you’re a black guy and you don’t vote for Kamala Harris, then you’re a horrible person who hates women. If that’s the campaign’s closing argument, then they’re obviously in a lot of trouble. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show  Unfortunately for anyone who’s pulling for Kamala, it does appear that, indeed, this is the message they’re going with. You can tell because Barack Obama isn’t the only surrogate for Kamala Harris who’s talking like this. Here for example is a Georgia “pastor” named Jamal Bryant. Kamala Harris visited his church this weekend. Watch: He’s saying that black men were misogynists because they didn’t support Stacey Abrams. And now they’re misogynists because they won’t support Kamala Harris. This is the pastor Kamala is trying to court. And just to be clear about who this pastor is and what he stands for, here’s the vision for his church he laid out in a podcast last year: This is the person Kamala is relying on to scold black men: A pastor who wants to turn his churches into marijuana farms, where they talk about sex toys. This is the quality of surrogate that she now has.  And it gets even worse. CNN asked Stacey Abrams about Jamal Bryant’s comments. You see, Stacey Abrams, unlike Donald Trump, is allowed to claim that all of her election losses are illegitimate, so CNN still pretends to take her seriously. And in this interview, Abrams basically agreed with what the pastor said. (Well, they didn’t bring up the sex toys and weed farms, although Stacey Abrams is an erotic fiction author, so we can fill in the blanks there anyway.) Watch: This is a refrain we’re hearing again and again from Kamala’s defenders. They are lashing out at black men, and only black men, for failing to support Kamala Harris. They’re not going after Hispanics, or even white guys. This is maybe the first time in the history of the modern Democrat Party that they’re leaving all of those other demographic groups alone, so that they can harangue black men. It’s hard to imagine a more counterproductive strategy, with under two weeks until the election. Let’s just assume that everything they’re saying is true, and that there’s an unusually large number of black men out there who are skeptical of electing a female president, solely on the basis of the fact that she’s a woman. The way to convince those people that a woman can lead this country isn’t to badger them. It’s not to nag them. That’s what you’d do if you wanted to reinforce every stereotype and negative perception in their minds. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 What you should do, if you really think there’s a critical mass of black men who are hesitant to vote for a woman, is to actually respond to their concerns. Explain to them why Kamala Harris is deserving of their respect, even though it’s true that various authoritarians and foreign adversaries probably won’t treat her with any kind of respect. Explain all the ways that Kamala Harris has demonstrated leadership and projected toughness, so that these voters can rest assured that they’re leaving the country in capable hands. None of Kamala’s surrogates can do that because they know that Kamala Harris isn’t capable of projecting toughness. She’s not capable of projecting a coherent thought, other than the idea that she grew up in a “middle-class family” and worked in a McDonald’s somewhere, even though there’s no record of either of those things occurring. So we’re left with this. Here’s just one more example. This is Jenn Psaki, the former Biden spokeswoman: If you do what none of these surrogates want to do, which is actually talk to black people, you’ll find that they happen to have the same concerns that other demographic groups have. They’re worried that Kamala Harris is unqualified. And they think she’d be bad for the economy. Here are just a couple of examples. The first is a clip from a voter in Pennsylvania. The second is a focus group conducted by the Daily Mail. The third is a group interview conducted by Anton Daniels. Watch: The second is a focus group conducted by the Daily Mail. The third is a group interview conducted by Anton Daniels. Watch: Imagine that. All of these black voters share some very fundamental concerns that millions of other people have, for good reasons. All of these concerns reflect very real problems with Kamala Harris. This is why Democrats probably shouldn’t have installed her in a coup. This is one of the benefits of actually holding a primary. Nowhere in any of these clips do these voters say that they hate women, or that they don’t think a woman is capable of being president. They obviously aren’t faking their answers, either. These are clearly their actual beliefs. This is why black voters, and in particular black men, aren’t supporting Kamala Harris to the extent they supported other Democrats. You can draw your own conclusions about why the Kamala Harris campaign is so irate about this. Maybe they’re realizing that the late-night vote counts from majority-black counties in eastern Pennsylvania aren’t going to swing their way this time around. (Or if they do swing their way, it’ll look even more suspicious). Maybe that’s why they’re so upset about what black voters are doing, as opposed to other demographic groups. Or maybe Democrats have so little respect for black people that they take their vote as a given, every single election cycle, regardless of the candidate they put forward. Maybe it’s all of the above. Regardless of what exactly is going on here, the Kamala Harris campaign is making its desperation as transparent as possible. This is their closing argument of the 2024 election: Vote for Kamala Harris or you hate women. This is like a parody of how to finish a campaign when you’re trying to elect the first woman president. And the reason the Kamala Harris campaign is losing its mind is that, contrary to all of their expectations, voters can see right through it.

If a significant number of illegal aliens and other non-citizens manage to vote in the upcoming election, the voting bloc could flip swing states in favor of Vice President Kamala Harris and deliver victory to the Democratic candidate, a new study reveals. The report from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) found that the number of voting age citizens in certain key swing states outnumbers the margins of victory in the 2020 election, indicating that non-citizens could materially change the outcome of the November 5th election if they are able to vote in significant numbers in violation of the law. “Census Bureau data collected earlier this year indicates that there are 23.2 million voting-age non-citizens in the country, roughly half of whom are illegal immigrants,” CIS states. “Our analysis does show that in a dozen states, plus the Nebraska 2nd district, the non-citizen population in 2024 is potentially large enough to exceed the state winner’s margin in 2020.” “Mathematically, there are 12 states, plus the Nebraska 2nd congressional district, where the voting-age non-citizen population is larger in 2024 than the state winner’s margin of victory in the last presidential election,” CIS reported before highlighting specific swing states that could be most impacted by illegal immigrant and other non-citizen voting. There are 12 states, plus the Nebraska 2nd congressional district, where the voting-age non-citizen population is larger in 2024 than the state winner’s margin of victory in the last presidential election. Full report: https://t.co/RtB6NDBkBF pic.twitter.com/HQK7UEIdgm — Center for Immigration Studies (@CIS_org) October 23, 2024 Less than two percent of the non-citizen populations of Arizona and Georgia would need to vote in each state in order to equal the margins of victory in the 2020 election, the study found. The two states, which together have 27 electoral votes, are both crucial swing states that will have an outsized role in deciding the winner of the presidential contest. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 A larger share of non-citizens would have to vote in other key swing states in order to eclipse the 2020 margin of victory, however. In North Carolina, 10.26 percent of non-citizens would have to vote, while over 15 percent would have to vote in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Existing data indicates that non-citizen voting would likely be a boon for Harris, giving her an advantage over former President Donald Trump. About two-thirds of foreign-born citizens favored the Democrats over the Republicans in the 2016 election. “Assuming non-citizens would have the same voting preferences as naturalized citizens in 2016, then it would require 4.49 percent of non-citizens to vote in Georgia and 5.13 percent to vote in Arizona in 2024 for the net gain in votes for Harris to exceed the margin of victory in the last presidential election,” CIS explained. Some recent data, however, indicates that Harris holds a more modest 20 point advantage over Trump. Leftwing organizations and donors appear to agree that bringing in large numbers of immigrants and allowing them to vote would help the Democratic Party. The analysis from CIS comes as a recent investigation from The Daily Wire found that far-Left organizations funded by Democratic mega donor George Soros have naturalized citizens in order to turn them into voters, saying the plan could “sway the outcome” of national elections. The role of mass immigration on American elections has come into sharp focus this year, with conservative figures warning of its long-term implications. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) alleged that Harris supports mass immigration because it will shift America “dramatically to the left,” allowing Democrats to “win every election forever.” Elon Musk has similarly warned that illegal immigration bolsters the population figures of liberal sanctuary states and cities, resulting in the areas receiving a higher number of Congressional districts. Any legislation that provides amnesty for illegal aliens could have an even more drastic impact on the fate of American elections. Over 10 million people have crossed the border under the Biden-Harris administration, with an estimated 1.7 million illegal immigrant gotaways recorded since the two took office in January 2021. In the final days of the race, the Harris campaign has even run an advertisement that claims Democrats are the party of border security, featuring an image of former president Donald Trump’s border wall.

In the early hours of the morning Friday, St. Anthony of Padua Catholic Church in Arizona went up in flames. Father Ariel Luston was fast asleep when he got the call, and he rushed to his parish to find the fire mostly contained. But the damage to the historic church was extensive, he shared in a phone interview with The Daily Wire: the sanctuary was heavily damaged, the pews and organ in the choir loft were destroyed, stained glass windows were shattered, and the entire interior had suffered severe smoke damage. “I hope the insurance will cover everything,” the parish priest said. He says he stayed at the church that day from 1:30 in the morning until 9:00 that evening, working with authorities, dealing with the devastation, and speaking with concerned parishioners. He was overwhelmed at the love and support shown to his parish by the community and other Christian churches in the area. “We will rise from the ashes,” he said he told his parishioners. “Ironically, it’s the people who are giving me words of support and love.” St. Anthony of Padua is one of almost 300 Catholic Churches that have suffered fires or acts of vandalism since the leak of the draft Supreme Court opinion indicating Roe v. Wade would soon be overturned. Many of these incidents have been discovered to be pro-abortion attacks, accompanied by graffiti that warns, “If abortions aren’t safe than neither are you,” or “Jane’s Revenge,” referring to “Jane Doe” in the original Roe v. Wade case. Fr. Luston does not know if his church suffered a pro-abortion attack. But he is not ruling that out. “Who knows,” Luston told The Daily Wire. The state is about to vote on Proposition 139, an amendment pushed by far-left abortion groups that would establish a “fundamental right to abortion” in Arizona, thereby allowing unlimited abortions up until birth in the state (Arizona for Abortion Access did not immediately respond to requests for comment). His parish has repeatedly pushed back against the amendment in social media posts. “Join our Bishops in saying NO to Proposition 139. SAY NO TO ABORTION!” the church posted on Facebook on September 17. “What makes a constitutional amendment especially grave is that our own Arizona legislators could lose the ability to regulate abortion in any meaningful way, leaving us with the potential for what would likely become nearly unrestricted abortion,” the bishops said in their statement. “Arizona law currently allows for abortions up until 15 weeks of pregnancy. Proposition 139, however, would go far beyond even this current law.” The bishops also pointed out that the amendment would allow minors to get abortions without parental involvement or permission and remove safeguards for girls and women already in place at abortion clinics. Casa Grande Fire Department fire marshal Frank Ricci told The Daily Wire on Wednesday that the incident continues to be under investigation “and is considered suspicious in nature.” Ricci shared that he requested the assistance of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) as soon as he was notified that there was a fire at the church — particularly due to the fact that the parish is “a place of worship and has significant meaning to my community.” The ATF confirmed to The Daily Wire that it is assisting the Casa Grande Fire Department in their investigation. Asked if there was any reason to believe the incident was tied to Proposition 139, Ricci responded: “Not at this time. We are still awaiting evaluation of a lot of evidence that was sent to the crime lab.” “At this time we are not ruling anything out,” he added. “I took the approach from the begining of this investigation that I was classifying this as a crime until proven otherwise by the data and science, just because it was a place of worship. Much like the police agencies do when there is a suicide. They classify it as a homicide until proven otherwise. ” In an Oct. 18 press statement, Ricci also shared that the “fire caused extensive damage to the interior of the church, particularly affecting the southwest side of the building. Significant fire damage also occurred in the eastern portion of the church, and the main worship area was impacted by heavy smoke and some fire.” “Fortunately, there were no injuries, as the building was unoccupied at the time of the incident,” he said. The national Catholic organization, CatholicVote, has tracked attacks on Catholic Churches and pregnancy centers for a number of years. And in a Wednesday statement to The Daily Wire, the organization’s director of the Catholic Accountability Project, Tommy Valentine, urged investigators to quickly get to the bottom of the matter. “CatholicVote has warned for months that there is a strong correlation between pro-abortion violence — including firebombings, arson, threats and more — and states where abortion is on the ballot,” Valentine said. “We hope and pray that the fire at St. Anthony of Padua’s is unrelated to political violence, however, Catholics have reason to be suspicious as it comes on the heels of over 400 attacks on Catholic Churches throughout the past few years,” he added. “We encourage investigators to quickly get to the bottom of this incident and for our local leaders to step up protections for Catholics and people of faith.”

Survivor of Mao’s China Xi Van Fleet talked about the gender insanity under the communist dictator, comparing it to what she’s seen in the United States with the transgender push. Speaking on “The Megyn Kelly Show” podcast, the Chinese woman and author of “Mao’s America” talked about growing up in Communist China during the Cultural Revolution, and issued a stark warning to Americans about the similar rhetoric she hears from Vice President Kamala Harris and the Left to that of Mao Zedong’s. “I know dear to your heart is the transgender issue. And people ask me, ‘Did Mao do transgender in China?’” Van Fleet told Megyn Kelly. “No, he didn’t. He did not have to because he had enough in tactics to achieve his goal, but he did attack gender role.” “And so growing up in China, the girls were all taught that femininity is toxic and it is weak,” she added. “It is bourgeois. It is not revolutionary. It is something to get rid of. … women and young girls, we think, talk, act, and dress like men and we become kind of like men.” “And that is what Mao did to China. Mao was dealing with a people that never knew freedom and always, always live under tyranny,” Van Fleet continued. “In America, this is the free people. And so they have to be more sophisticated. And what they’re doing in America, I have to say, it’s more evil than what Mao did, only that Mao killed more people. But this idea of you can transition from one gender to another just by identifying yourself, that is absolutely evil.” Kelly pointed out that it’s also “very destabilizing for the family unit, for the community, for the school, and that seems to be of some benefit to a Mao-type thinker.” Van Fleet also talked about how the communist dictator used “identity politics to divide people and control people and set them against each other” and said this is exactly what the Critical Race Theory aims to do — except with race. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 “Back then I really did not know. I did not pay that much attention,” Van Fleet explained. “I tell everyone that when I came to America, I thought I left communism behind me. I thought, I really thought there’s nothing for me to worry about and as myself, I made this mistake.” “I did not share my stories of the Cultural Revolution with my friends, my family,” she added. “I just want to forget about it. And so now in 2020, I realized that people just don’t know. They don’t know and that is why actually in 2022, I finally decided that a short interview here and a speech over there won’t do it. I quit my job and wrote that book, and that book really explained the parallels of these two Cultural Revolutions, and [I] tell everyone this is history repeating.”

We are now less than two weeks out from Election Day. The state of the race is that Donald Trump appears to be ahead going into the homestretch. In fact, poll analyst reporter Mark Halperin said as much yesterday, claiming that if the early voting numbers hold up the way they are right now, and if the date of voting goes the way that it did in 2020, Trump will have wrapped up this election before the Election Day even begins — because Democrats basically need to win it in the pregame or they’re going to lose it day of.  Halperin explained, saying: Let’s lead with the lead, as they say in journalism. If the early vote numbers stay the way they are, and that’s a big if, we’ll almost certainly know before Election Day who’s going to win the election. We’re going to talk a lot about that: the reasons why Democrats might be underperforming, the prospect that they’ll recover. But again, make no mistake, if these numbers hold up in the states where we can understand even partially what the data is like, we’ll know that Donald Trump’s going to be president on Election Day.  Halperin’s not the only one saying this. The Washington Post reported on this yesterday as well: Dozens of states have opened in-person early-voting locations, and turnout has been robust. In Georgia, more than 1.6 million people had cast in-person ballots by midmorning Tuesday — nearly one-third of the total vote from four years ago. North Carolina hit 1.4 million Tuesday, the sixth day of early voting. And in Nevada, Republicans voting in person have outnumbered Democrats — a reversal from four years ago. Nationwide, more than 18 million Americans have cast ballots in person or by mail. Republican participation is radically up from where it was in 2020, after Trump encouraged people not to vote early. Now, tons of Republicans are voting early, and that means in states like Nevada, there are serious danger signs for Democrats.  Attorney Jon Ralston, an excellent reporter at the Nevada Independent, has noted that since the rise of the political machine that late former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid built for Democrats, this has never happened. The Republican turn out amounts are unprecedented in modern times, leading early voting in Nevada. Harris is running really, really weak in the early voting thus far. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show Again, it could be that that’s cannibalizing the day of voting. It’s possible the people who are voting right now are people who would have normally voted on Election Day, or it’s possible that Republicans have actually gotten smart and many of the people who weren’t going to show up on Election Day are now voting early just to get it done. By the way, if you are voting early, that is good because the party for which you are voting can see that you have voted. They don’t have to waste campaign resources door knocking if they already know that you voted. A senior official working on Harris’s campaign is already sounding the alarm about the Veep’s narrowing electoral path. According to NBC News, three sources with knowledge of the campaign strategy say the campaign is worried the blue wall could at least, in part, go red this November. One senior campaign official told NBC there’s been a thought that Michigan or Wisconsin may fall off and North Carolina may no longer be in reach. If the Democrats lose North Carolina and Michigan or Wisconsin, it is difficult to see how they will win the election because, at that point, they would have to peel off Georgia. Politico is reporting the same, pointing out that time is ticking off the clock for Harris: Vice President Kamala Harris and former Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney descended on the crucial Milwaukee suburbs Monday night and, sitting side by side, delivered compelling political sermons. The problem was they were preaching to the converted. The event was explicitly aimed at those moderates and onetime Republicans who remain up for grabs, and may decide the election, but the rhetoric seemed better suited for those in the audience wearing “The Lincoln Project” and “,LA” t-shirts. They’ve got a problem on their hands, and so it is now time to pull out all the stops, which could be that Harris could run a better campaign. That, of course, is highly unlikely. She’s not going to run a better campaign because she’s not a good candidate. Hilariously, there was an op-ed in The Hill two days ago wondering if perhaps Joe Biden was, after all, a better candidate than Kamala Harris, which of course, is what Joe Biden has been saying all along, despite being dead. Kamala Harris, for her part, can’t even answer simple questions as to whether Biden is sentient and alive. She will not answer questions on the decline of the person she shoved off the back of the train and stole the nomination of. In an interview with NBC News, Harris attempted to explain Joe Biden’s mental state when pointblank asked about him:  JACKSON: You have made it clear that you believe this is a binary choice between you and Donald Trump. That’s — those are candidates that are on the ballot, of course. HARRIS: There’s only two choices…yes.  JACKSON: Of course, yes, but, and I know that Joe Biden is not on the ballot, I understand that, but the reason that you are at the top of the ticket is because he dropped out of this race. And so I want to ask you, and it was largely because of that debate performance back in June. You defended him in the days before and in the days after, as you were campaigning for another four years for President Biden. Can you say that you were honest with the American people about what you saw in those moments with President Biden, as you were with him again and again, repeatedly in that time?  HARRIS: Of course. Joe Biden is an — extremely accomplished, experienced and capable in every way that anyone would want of their president. Absolutely. JACKSON: And you never saw anything like what happened at the debate night behind closed doors with him?  HARRIS: It was a bad debate. People have bad debates. That — he is absolutely… JACKSON: But that’s the reason why you’re here, and he’s not running for the top of the ticket.  HARRIS: Well, you’d have to ask him if that’s the only reason why.  JACKSON: What do you think? HARRIS: I am running for President of the United States. Joe Biden is not, and my presidency will be about bringing a new generation of leadership to America that is focused on the work that we need to do, to invest in the ambitions and aspirations of the American people.  This lady has absolutely nothing. The reason that she has lost all steam is because she has nothing. She cannot even answer the simple question, “Why are you in that chair and Joe Biden isn’t in that chair?” — when everyone in America knows the answer to that question, including, of course, Kamala Harris.  Harris has basically been relegated to throwing out bribes to various constituency groups. Just a couple of weeks ago, she pledged to hand out $20,000 to black people in forgivable loans. She is now doing the same for Latinos because she’s been losing Latino votes.  In a statement yesterday, she wrote: Donald Trump has disrespected and insulted Latino men in communities. As president, I will invest in them.” What does that mean? It means that she will “help Latino men and others start and grow small businesses with no interest loans or deferred loan repayments, and fully forgivable loans up to $20k. Bribery. We are now in the realm of open bribery. By the way, you are not allowed to give out government grants by race. That is illegal in the United States. This is her campaign and it’s failing. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 Now the time has come for October surprises. The Democrats have a problem when it comes to surprises with Trump. This has been true for years because Trump is a monster made out of mud. When you throw more mud at a monster made out of mud, it turns out he just looks like a monster made out of mud. Trump is the black socks of presidential candidates. Black socks never get dirty. The longer you wear them, the blacker they get. That is who Donald Trump is. The more you throw at him, the more he just looks like Donald Trump because he is the most well-established political figure in the American mind in my lifetime — and my parents lifetime as well. There is no one in America who does not have an opinion about Trump right now. The question for undecided voters is not what they think about Trump. The question is what they think about Harris. Trump’s numbers have been incredibly steady for the entirety of this election cycle. In polling, Trump’s national average polling has been between 46% and 48% of the entirety of this race. Meanwhile, there is much more variability for Harris. So, the Democrats are getting desperate.

'Wildly unethical and likely illegal'

Republican Texas Rep. Brian Babin and a group of House Republicans sent a letter Tuesday to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), slamming them over a recent announcement that Lebanese nationals inside the U.S. will now be eligible for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and work authorization due to war in the Middle East. The Daily […]

'So tight in her answers'

'Protect reproductive freedom'

'He has been caring ... compassionate'