If you're looking for an all-natural way to keep your skin clean and smooth, you'll love this homemade body wash! My recipe includes coconut oil, raw honey, Castile soap, essential oils and Vitamin E – these ingredients are totally natural and great for keeping your skin soft and smooth. Plus, it smells amazing! Check out the tutorial below to see how I made mine, and don’t forget to leave your own homemade home product ideas in the comments. How to Make This Homemade Body Wash The chilly winter season is upon us, which means it’s more important than ever to protect your skin from the harsh weather. I'm a huge fan of all-natural bath products (especially in the cold winter months), so I thought I'd share this homemade body wash with you all. It’s totally easy to make, and it really works great at keeping your skin moisturized! Simply pour these all-natural ingredients in a big glass bowl, stir the mixture thoroughly, then pour it all into a reusable container for your shower. As a homesteader, I try to make as many of my own homemade products as possible. This recipe is fantastic for homesteaders on a budget, and it's made with 100 percent all-natural ingredients. This homemade body wash is perfect for the whole family – especially those who prefer all-natural products to store-bought ones. Homemade body wash ingredients: ½ cup coconut oil ½ cup raw honey 1 cup liquid Castile soap 20 drops essential oil (vanilla or lavender) 1 tbsp. Vitamin E oil Step 1: Combine your ingredients. Use a funnel to pour 1 cup of liquid Castile soap into a reusable glass or plastic bottle. Slowly add 1/2 cup of melted virgin coconut oil. Add 1 teaspoon of Vitamin E oil, ½ cup of raw honey, and 10-15 drops of your favorite essential oil. Step 2: Shake well. Twist the cap onto your bottle, then shake the bottle vigorously to combine the ingredients. Step 3: Stick it in the shower or bath. Shake well before each use. Lather on every day for soft glowing skin. Watch the video below to see how it's done: And if you need more DIY products to try this winter, I have here 31 homemade home products ready for you! What do you think of this homemade body wash? Will you give it a try? I’m excited to know! Let me know in the comments below.

Surprising no one, the New York Times on Monday endorsed Kamala Harris for president – the 17th Democratic nominee in a row the paper has endorsed, a pattern that began with its endorsement of John F. Kennedy over Richard Nixon in 1960 – an endorsement considerably more measured and muted than 2024’s loving embrace of Harris. What was a little surprising: While the left-wing editorial board predictably praised Harris, it obnoxiously referred to her as “The Only Patriotic Choice for President.” The Times true interest was in condemning Donald Trump for a familiar litany of sins, some true, some exaggerated, some false, starting with that headline, from a paper that has long mocked conservative patriotism. It is hard to imagine a candidate more unworthy to serve as president of the United States than Donald Trump. He has proved himself morally unfit for an office that asks its occupant to put the good of the nation above self-interest. He has proved himself temperamentally unfit for a role that requires the very qualities -- wisdom, honesty, empathy, courage, restraint, humility, discipline -- that he most lacks. Those disqualifying characteristics are compounded by everything else that limits his ability to fulfill the duties of the president: his many criminal charges, his advancing age, his fundamental lack of interest in policy and his increasingly bizarre cast of associates. This unequivocal, dispiriting truth -- Donald Trump is not fit to be president -- should be enough for any voter who cares about the health of our country and the stability of our democracy to deny him re-election. For this reason, regardless of any political disagreements voters might have with her, Kamala Harris is the only patriotic choice for president. The silliness continued: Harris's "competence and an unwavering commitment to the Constitution"? Since when? As a dedicated public servant who has demonstrated care, competence and an unwavering commitment to the Constitution, Ms. Harris stands alone in this race…. Beyond the economy, Ms. Harris promises to continue working to expand access to health care and reduce its cost. She has a long record of fighting to protect women’s health and reproductive freedom. Mr. Trump spent years trying to dismantle the Affordable Care Act and boasts of picking the Supreme Court justices who ended the constitutional right to an abortion. Criticism of Harris was paltry in comparison. Many voters have said they want more details about the vice president’s plans, as well as more unscripted encounters in which she explains her vision and policies. They are right to ask…. The paper blamed Trump for an “insurrection at the Capitol” (a strong term for the January 6 riot). Unless American voters stand up to him, Mr. Trump will have the power to do profound and lasting harm to our democracy. Perhaps surprisingly, the paper briefly noted Trump’s accomplishments in office, including “his focus on Covid vaccine development paid off,” even “his decision to use an emergency public health measure to turn away migrants at the border was the right call at the start of the pandemic.” The editorial concluded that “Kamala Harris is the only choice.” Left out: Not the one, but the two attempts on Donald Trump’s life. Wouldn't a fair-minded editorial admit that not all the danger to America is coming from Trump, but is in fact targeting him? The Wall Street Journal was offended by the paper’s use of “patriotic” and reminded readers of the paper’s deep hypocrisy when it comes to the Constitution, especially the First Amendment, as Newsbusters has documented repeatedly.

Imagine if you could start from scratch and search Google without a previous internet search history. How would Google twist the results without knowing the user who is asking for it?  MRC Free Speech America VP Dan Schneider explains their latest research into Google. Gabriela Pariseau reported that a clean Google search on September 6 for the presidential candidates would lead you inevitably to Democrat media sources (Politico, New York Times, Washington Post). No one imagines those sources are going to provide anything objective on Trump, not when they rail against him as killing democracy in darkness. But they are the "trustworthy" sources, and conservative media are treated as pure misinformation. On Harris, it found a whole series of articles on Democrat expert Allan Lichtman predicting Harris would defeat Trump. It should not be seen as shocking that a Democrat reviewed all of his research and concluded the Democrat would win. What a satisfied circle of "wisdom" this made within Google.  We also discuss whether it's possible that CBS News will host a fair vice-presidential debate on Tuesday night. All evidence suggests they won't. At least they're claiming they're not going to push their moderators to "fact check in real time." Enjoy the podcast below, or wherever you listen to podcasts.   

Meet Inspiration Behind Off-Broadway Play About Son Who Turned in His Father Over January 6

Here's a Typical White Dude for Harris Getting His Groove On

Dominion and Georgia Face Heat in Court

BREAKING: Israeli Ground Forces Enter Lebanon

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green, R-Tenn., issued a subpoena to Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra regarding the whereabouts of tens of thousands of unaccompanied minor migrant children who are in the United States.

As roads in North Carolina remain impassable after Hurricane Helene ravaged the region, rescue groups are using mules to help deliver aid to residents stranded in hard-to-reach areas.