YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Survival Prepper
Survival Prepper  
1 y

EMERGENCY ALERT!! ISRAELI INVASION OF LEBANON HAS BEGUN!! (CONTINUOUS MONITORING)
Favicon 
prepping.com

EMERGENCY ALERT!! ISRAELI INVASION OF LEBANON HAS BEGUN!! (CONTINUOUS MONITORING)

#nyprepper #WW3 #breakingnews GET 25% OFF THE THREE MONTH EMERGENCY FOOD SUPPLY FROM MY PATRIOT SUPPLY HERE: http://preparewithnyprepper.com For first access to breaking news updates check out my Patreon $3/month and direct messaging to me: https://www.patreon.com/NYPrepper Leave a tip if you feel compelled: https://paypal.me/NYPrepper?locale.x=en_US "CULINARY NIGHT" - https://rumble.com/v58d1g5-culinary-night-the-night-we-came-close-to-nuclear-war.html Rumble: https://rumble.com/NYPrepper Telegram: t.me/nyprepper1 Twitter: @nyprepper1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR GREAT DEALS ON VARIOUS PREPPING PRODUCTS CHECK MY SPONSORS BELOW!! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MY WEBSITE - http://www.newyorkprepper.com for a FREE DISCUSSION FORUM, blog, and articles. SIGN UP FOR E-MAIL ALERTS AT THE BOTTOM OF MY WEBPAGE FOR CRITICAL & BREAKING UPDATES TO YOUR E-MAIL!! (I DO NOT SEND SPAM) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MY MERCHANDISE (T-shirts, mugs, towels, bags): https://teespring.com/stores/nyprepper-merchandise ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contact me at nyprepper85@gmail.com to speak anonymously and share any information you feel would be good to share with my audience. All sources will remain confidential! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MASON LEATHER - leather products made in Texas, VETERAN OWNED: http://www.masonleather.com USE PROMO CODE "NY10" for 10% OFF CRAFT HOLSTERS - fine hand-made european holsters http://www.craftholsters.com/holsters USE PROMO CODE "NYPrepper5" for 5% OFF!! OLIGHT - high quality flashlights at a good price USE PROMO CODE "NYPrepper10" for 10% OFF!! Use my affiliate link: https://www.olightstore.com?streamerId=1434870235842121731&channel=default GET 70% OFF Virtual Shield VPN use my link: https://virtualshield.com/deals/nyprepper -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

NSW Police calls a man a "Fucking retard" in front of his Child
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

NSW Police calls a man a "Fucking retard" in front of his Child

All the man was doing was asking what the charge was for?? Isn't that his right? The policeman stepped back after he said that on camera he realised he f-kd up!! ?? I hope that this power hungry idiot gets severely reprimanded for his actions!!
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Biden Isn’t Sabotaging Harris, Is He?
Favicon 
spectator.org

Biden Isn’t Sabotaging Harris, Is He?

No, this column isn’t declaring that Joe Biden is deliberately drilling holes in the hull of the S.S. Kamala. But I might just be suggesting it a little. Or maybe, what I’ll say is that if in fact Biden was trying to sabotage Harris’ campaign efforts, it might not look very different from what it looks like now. Oh, come on. The idea of Biden sabotaging Harris isn’t all that far-fetched. In fact, it’s pretty much what you’d expect him to do. You might not think he’s capable of it because you bought into the media narrative that somehow Joe Biden is a stand-up guy and a man of honor. That narrative is as false as it is persuasive. Joe Biden is a son of a b***h, and he always has been. He’s venal, crooked, petty, and narcissistic in a way that has marked him as one of the worst examples of awful American politics for 50 years. But he didn’t get that public reputation because most of Biden’s abuses have been directed at people the media doesn’t like. Robert Bork, for example. Or Clarence Thomas. Biden managed to ride the partisan-Democrat train and got a pass for his dirty tricks for decades. Most people wrote him off after he got caught plagiarizing Neil Kinnock’s speeches and was run out of the 1988 presidential primary race for it. That he ended up as Barack Obama’s vice president was a factor of Biden being Obama’s kind of SOB. That and Obama could use Biden as a bridge to the white working class voters he was actively seeking to screw over. And Biden, so desperate for power and relevance that he would even sign up to be the No. 2 man in an administration fronted by a black guy (this, remember, is one of the most unreconstructed racists in American politics over the past half-century, with the public friendships with folks like Robert KKK Byrd to prove it), was happy to join in for the screwing. Especially given the pipeline serving as Obama’s veep would establish between some of the world’s sleaziest global villains and his own bank account. That Biden is capable of betrayal is hardly news to anyone. But then you introduce the fact that Biden is the victim, rather than the perpetrator, of the most shocking political betrayal of recent years, and it further establishes the motivation for a sabotage. We are speaking here of the palace coup in which Obama and Nancy Pelosi knifed Biden in the back and took the Democrats’ presidential nomination away from him thanks to his rotten performance in the June 27 debate with Donald Trump and the multiple “senior moments” he displayed afterward. Were Obama and Pelosi justified in screwing Biden out of the nomination he won in the Democrat primaries? Yes, probably so. Biden is so far gone cognitively that he really oughtn’t still be in office. But that’s been true for well more than a year, and these people all collaborated to hide this fact from the American public. The palace coup was merely something that could and should have been executed in July of 2023, not July of 2024; had it been shoved down his throat the previous year there could have been an actual American electoral process complete with Democrat voters getting to choose the Democrat nominee. If you’re disgusted by this as a voter, think how disgusted Biden is over what was done to him. Based on multiple reports we already know that Biden rushed out to endorse Kamala Harris, effectively handing the nomination over to her against the wishes of Obama, who had been openly discussing the possibility of a mini-media primary that he apparently thought would result in Sen. Mark Kelly getting the nomination. Obama might not have been right about that. Kelly’s business ties to communist China, including a sizable investment in a company that makes spy balloons not unlike the ones wafting over the continental United States on Biden’s watch, would likely have made him a bad choice. But Biden endorsing Harris made the Democrats’ machine go all in for her, propping up a clearly deficient candidate who can’t do even softball media interviews without coming off as an idiot. Harris went from a major liability as vice president to a “cultural phenomenon,” based on … nothing. Which makes her vulnerable to sabotage. And Biden would have nothing to lose. He’s immune from negative consequences if he buries the knife in her back, after all. Obama and Pelosi have already seen to that with the palace coup. We know it’s a matter of time before he either pardons his son or commutes whatever sentence he gets from his various criminal trials. If that happens before the election, it’ll be proof that Biden aims to sabotage Harris. After all, if Trump didn’t go after Hillary Clinton, he isn’t going after Biden. Trump has already taken the position that living well is the best revenge, politically speaking and otherwise. And most Democrats, whether they’ll admit it or not, wouldn’t be philosophically opposed to sweeping the deck clear of the current people in charge of their party — they just think the price of doing that, which is to lose an election to Trump and therefore be out of political power for four years, is ruinous. If Trump were to beat Harris, that price becomes fixed — so who cares if Biden sabotaged her? And there’s nothing much you can do to him anyway. He’s so decrepit he barely knows who he is. But again, this is just a theory. I’m not the first one advancing it. And I’m not saying current events prove the theory. But they don’t disprove it, do they? After all, there is this… Ummm, okay. Yes, the federal government had resources pre-planned in advance of Hurricane Helene’s murderous swath through western Florida and into Appalachia. But that’s never the extent of what’s needed when a massive emergency like this hits. There is always supplemental aid coming. Except he just said there wouldn’t be any. Did Biden walk that back? Well, he had a press conference Monday and he rattled off a bunch of things, but then there was this: REPORTER: "On the hurricane, why weren't you and VP Harris here in Washington commanding this this weekend?" BIDEN: "I was commanding! I was on the phone…" pic.twitter.com/ak07MAcGiL — Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 30, 2024 Yikes. He phoned in his hurricane response. Meanwhile half of western North Carolina is now reduced to a state of nature and there are whole towns cut off from the outside world thanks to washed-out roads and bridges, cut power lines, downed cell towers, and other destroyed infrastructure. It doesn’t help that the worst damage perhaps anywhere in Helene’s swath lies in Asheville, which has become a haven for crunchy lefties as it has grown. The local leadership is a collection of morons more interested in transgender ideology than emergency management, which bodes ill when a massive hurricane blows through and covers the place with floodwaters. Those voters aren’t going to love hearing Biden tell them they have all they need. And when they find out that Harris was fundraising out west and has had little involvement in the Helene response, they probably won’t like it much, either. Then again, Kamala was certainly concerned about the victims of Helene; she proved that by running ads on the Weather Channel as the storm was cutting its swath of destruction through the Southeast. Could all this be a natural manifestation of, as Obama famously said, Biden’s ability to “f**k things up?” Absolutely. On the other hand, if Biden was sabotaging Harris, he couldn’t have done too much more than to express satisfaction with the federal response to the storm when it’s clearly lacking in energy so far. Then there’s this… BIDEN: "I'm more aware than you might know." You sure about that? pic.twitter.com/hZfWmfVFcs — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 30, 2024 Israel has been literally taking out the trash in southern Lebanon by decapitating nearly all of Hezbollah’s top management and much of their middle management in advance of routing them out of their positions. This, in tandem with what the Israelis have been able to do in Gaza, creates the best possibility in decades for a lasting peace in that region; destroying Iran’s proxies ringing Israel and forcing a transition to nation-state action in Middle Eastern affairs is the only way you’re ever going to have a deal anybody can stick to. But Biden continues speaking weakly about ceasefires when that’s clearly not going to happen, and it’s a level of weakness that has to be corrosive to Harris’ campaign. He isn’t taking the position that we’re going to cut off aid to Israel, although they’ve put on the brakes about sending certain kinds of ordnance to the IDF, so what’s he going to do to enforce this “diplomacy” of which he speaks? After Oct. 7, Israel is about finally winning this war rather than another ceasefire that merely buys time for the Iranians to rearm Hamas and Hezbollah. You can’t blame them. Biden can either support that cause or oppose it. Instead, he dithers in the middle, which has a poor effect on the Muslim voters Harris has to have in a state like Michigan while at the same time irritating a chunk of the Jewish support that her campaign would be broke without. Again, if he was trying to sabotage her, this would be a way to do it that would be both effective and not quite obvious. And it isn’t like Kamala Harris has the political chops to sidestep this thing as it gets worse. But what might be the coup de grace is this impending disaster: About 45,000 dockworkers are expected to strike for higher wages across three dozen East and Gulf coast ports at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday. There is potential for increased consumer costs on a wide range of goods just five weeks before Election Day, and 12 weeks before Christmas. Negotiations have been tense since June. The disagreement is between the International Longshore Association and Warehouse Union, which represents port workers across the country, and the U.S. Maritime Alliance, which represents terminal operators and ocean carriers. Wages of East and Gulf coast workers are a base wage of $39 an hour after six years. The union is asking for a 77% pay raise increase over six years. It is also asking for more restrictions and bans on the automation of cranes, gates, and container movements used to load or unload cargo. North America’s largest union of maritime workers has 85,000 longshoremen from the Atlantic and Gulf coasts, according to its website. The strike would impact 36 U.S. ports handling about one-half of U.S. ocean imports. Included are Boston, New York, New Jersey and Philadelphia. While negotiations have remained stagnant, both parties have continued to push out updates on the situations. The dockworkers’ strike could very easily give the U.S. economy a heart attack a little more than a month before the presidential election. With the amount of foreign trade the U.S. supply chain relies on, our ports are more crucial than ever. The Biden Department of Transportation has done absolutely nothing to head off this strike. Politically it should have been obvious that a Democrat administration would have sided with the longshoremen and pressured the Maritime Alliance, which has an awful lot of foreign investment and ownership (that’s generally a good thing economically, but it’s not such a great thing politically, particularly if you’re a Democrat and you’re weighing the two sides). And yet he’s done nothing. The effect? Well, just remember the supply chain meltdown back in 2021 as Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg took a powder to go on “paternity leave” complete with cutesy photos of him and his husband in what looked like a birthing bed with the two kids they adopted. That was a bleak moment you’d think the Democrats wouldn’t want to revive in the public’s perception, and yet it’s a good preview of what happens as food rots on the docks of American ports while grocery stores no longer have fresh produce to sell. Right before an election. There are lots of levers Biden could be pulling to settle the strike. Instead he’s on a beach. It’s not Biden who bears the political cost of a busted supply chain right before an election, you know. And believe me, even in his decrepit old mind, Biden is well aware of that. Again — we’re not saying he’s sabotaging Harris. But we’re not not saying it, either. If he were sticking that knife in her back, it probably wouldn’t look much different from this. READ MORE: Why Is Kamala Still Losing? Why We Inherently Despise Kamala Harris Teamsters Expose Fatal Harris Weakness The post Biden Isn’t Sabotaging Harris, Is He? appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Making the Shining City on the Hill Great Again
Favicon 
spectator.org

Making the Shining City on the Hill Great Again

What happens when the shining city on the hill becomes a tale of two cities? In one city, there is freedom and family, church and community, and patriotism and order. In another, there is anarchy and isolation, wokeism and tribes, and hatred and violence. These two cities exist all over America. One city thrives in some states, while the other city succeeds in others. Americans are choosing their favored city by voting with their feet and migrating. They’re seeking better horizons. Democrats, champions of an open border and the suffering of others, are indifferent to the plight of their own citizens. In fact, they seem to enjoy the suffering of their people — if they even view American citizens as “their” people.  Subscribe to The American Spectator to receive our fall 2024 print magazine, which includes this article and others like it. The news media and talking heads on X portray the Biden–Harris years as good. According to them, Americans are stupid and just don’t see how great this administration is. The cognitive dissonance this take induces is almost hallucinogenic. People are being asked to disbelieve their own eyes — their “lived experience.” Americans have grocery bills that aren’t 20 percent higher than four years ago; they’re 100 percent higher. Their salaries haven’t increased in this time, and so, for four years, thanks to inflation, their income has gone backwards. Everyday living becomes an anxious slog. Homelessness, suicides, loneliness, and despair are on the rise. This article is taken from The American Spectator’s fall 2024 print magazine. Subscribe to receive the entire magazine. On the world stage, there are wars and persecutions. Christians are being killed on every continent, and the media says nothing. Thousands of young Russian and Ukrainian men have died over the last few years, and for what, exactly? Israel and her surrounding neighbors sit on dry tinder as world leaders walk around them with lit matches. Art by Bill Wilson No one seems at all aware of the consequences of their provocative actions. The carelessness seems intentional. But how can that be? Who would want a collapsed society? Who would want a world war with the devastating technology that now exists? Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, and the Democrats seem immune to understanding human nature, policy, consequences — anything. They barrel along, drunk on power, stumbling into the ditch of debauchery, disease, drug abuse, and anti-family gender policies designed to foster lifelong sexual despair. A feckless Republican Party is nearly as bad: mute on what matters, divided, majoring in the minors, and on the take. It has ever been thus. In this issue, Daniel J. Flynn leads with his discussion of the coming reckoning. So it falls to Donald Trump.  Who is Donald Trump and what does he stand for? Does he recognize the culture-gutting consequences of unfettered immigration? Does he have the strength of character to resist the worldwide war machine? Does he understand that protecting the unborn is fundamental to protecting all human rights because it means being a voice for the voiceless? The shining city must prevail, or there will be no sanctuary anywhere for anyone. How is it possible to once again have no idea how Donald Trump will govern after four years in office and four years out of office to define himself and his policies? Perhaps by the time you, dear reader, find this magazine, more will be clear, but it is unlikely that the media will help you. The media specializes in theater and distraction, not in conveying truth or information. It strives to be the ultimate paid influencer. Which brings us to influencers and aliens. This inane topic seems ubiquitous now, with intelligence officers talking in conspiratorial tones about things they saw or heard other people say they saw. Nonsense. Demons? Angels? Sure. Hillary Clinton is a lizard person? Possible. But the alien thing is a diversion away from the real threat to civilization. The true enemy isn’t out there. It’s here. It’s within. It’s spiritual. In a republic, it’s in the heart of every citizen. A republic rises and falls on the character of her people, and Americans are compromising too much of their souls for expedience and pleasure. Americans and the West are like a lonely only child in a divorce: rich in material wealth but deprived of soul connection. Now, however, the material wealth is dwindling, as the parents have squandered their riches and the leaders have raped the public coffers. Can Donald Trump be the humble servant leader that the United States and the world need to stop this madness? Does he have the strength of will to dismantle the administrative state? Does he have wisdom borne of experience to choose staff thoughtfully and intentionally? Does he have the ability to discern between friend and foe, or is it to be yes-men and sycophants? Ronald Reagan talked about “A time for choosing.” After Biden, and assuming Trump wins, America will face another time for choosing, but America is not the same. It’s more diverse and not in a good way — Americans have become married to their identities of race, culture, country of origin, and sex. In some cases, they’ve married themselves. They divide themselves along their petty narcissisms. They betray their vows. They choose addiction over connection.  America is consumed by a radical individualism mixed with unassimilated immigration, and it has left too many people adrift with no real sense of family, community, or common purpose. America is fractured into shards of DEI glass, and anyone who tries to reassemble it will cut himself. This problem didn’t exist in the time of Reagan. Yes, there was the similar economic malaise, unstable world, and conflict fatigue. Yes, there was crime and racial tension and drug wars. But Americans still cohered around certain principles: they were still overwhelmingly God-fearing and Christian, they were still connected on a human level as it was before distracting technology took hold, and they still valued family and home over the superficial and material. America has changed, and not for the better. The task before Trump and American citizens is monumental. One fears that failure to succeed in this last-ditch endeavor to make America great again will be fatal and final. Americans need to face the pain induced by carelessly printing money. They need to face the fact that the young have been sacrificed on the altar of the comfort of the older generations. This is immoral and a travesty. It will take great political will for Trump to look into the dentures of these older voters and do what is right for the future of the country, not just what is expedient now. In short, Trump is going to have to be a clarion voice championing personal responsibility and community cohesion. He will have to talk about the importance of God and family. He will have to be all that is good about masculinity: resolute, self-sacrificial, courageous, and disagreeable. He will have to bring order and impose structure in a world ruled by out-of-control feminine chaos. The bureaucracy is essentially feminine and suffocating. She needs to be checked. The shining city on the hill needs to be rebuilt. Will Donald Trump be the hero that Gotham needs? Whether Trump wins or loses, whether he takes this mantle or sells out, conservatives have been making solid gains against the dark tyranny taking hold in the West. They’re taking the fight to DEI, porn, and many other social ills. They’re going back to church. They’re reclaiming their masculinity and femininity. They’re seeking communities that share their values. They’re getting married and having children — these days, a radical act. The solution to the current darkness is within each American. Each citizen must have a personal revival, as Scott McKay writes, and together, and with momentum, both conservatism and the culture can transform for the better. A house divided cannot stand. The two cities at war within America must, for the sake of Western Civilization and the world, stop warring. The shining city must prevail, or there will be no sanctuary anywhere for anyone. There will only be violence and drugs and despair and fear. Venezuelan cartels will rule, and Chinese drugs will fuel the downward spiral. Without a shot fired, America will become a nonentity as evil advances around the world. Let’s hope that Donald Trump wins and, should he win, that he has what it takes to make America great again. More importantly, let’s hope Americans have the will to fight for their country. Let’s hope the shining city shines again. Subscribe to The American Spectator to receive our fall 2024 print magazine. The post Making the Shining City on the Hill Great Again appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

The New York Times Accuses Trump of the Very Traits That Exemplify the Left
Favicon 
spectator.org

The New York Times Accuses Trump of the Very Traits That Exemplify the Left

There they go again: “It is harder to imagine a candidate more unworthy to serve as president of the United States than Donald Trump.” And with that, the New York Times Editorial Board is off and running with its latest Trump-obsessive and decidedly hysterical denouncement of the former president. And an oh-by-the-way endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris.  As is frequently true with the Times, the editorial is hysterical in both uses of that word. Humorously, the first definition of the word in Merriam-Webster’s dictionary fits the Times editorial precisely.  The dictionary writes: 1. … the paper did not hesitate to appeal to racial passions in hysterical headlines and rabid editorials. — The New Yorker “relating to, or marked by hysteria.” Amusingly, the Times editorial fits both definitions. It is replete with rants about supposed Trump deficiencies, while also so over the top as to make the editorial laughable on its face. Let’s take a look.   That first paragraph writes:  It is hard to imagine a candidate more unworthy to serve as president of the United States than Donald Trump. He has proved himself morally unfit for an office that asks its occupant to put the good of the nation above self-interest. He has proved himself temperamentally unfit for a role that requires the very qualities — wisdom, honesty, empathy, courage, restraint, humility, discipline — that he most lacks. Say what? The former president lacks “courage”? This is the president that mere months ago was literally shot, sending him to the ground with a seriously bleeding bullet wound to his right ear. A wound that missed hitting and killing him by inches.  His reaction? To get back on his feet, blood pouring from his wound, raising his fist in the air and memorably telling his horrified supporters to “Fight! Fight! Fight!” No courage? Is the Times joking? Seriously? As the American people could see, Trump was the very personification of courage. Trump, they write, has no “empathy”? This appearing as Trump showed up in hard-hit Valdosta, Georgia, with Fox reporting:  Trump was briefed by FEMA as well as state and local officials. And he toured a furniture store heavily damaged by the storm. But after criticizing the federal storm response minutes earlier, Trump said in remarks to a larger crowd assembled that “at a time like this when a crisis hits, when our fellow citizens cry out in need, we’re not talking about politics now. We all need to get together and get this solved.” … “I’ve come to Valdosta with large semi-trucks, many of them, filled with relief aid. A tanker truck filled up with gasoline, a couple of big tanker trucks filled up with gasoline, which they can’t get now. And we’ll be working to distribute it throughout the day,” Trump highlighted. So there is the former president, holding no office at all, showing up in Valdosta “with large semi-trucks, many of them, filled with relief aid.” That’s lacking empathy? Really? Where was Harris? Where has Biden been? Sleeping at the beach again? No wisdom? This is the self-same former president who made clear to America’s adversaries that he supported a peace through strength foreign policy, which in turn kept Russia’s Putin from invading Ukraine and Hamas from invading Israel. Biden and Harris, decidedly lacking that wisdom, made a point of showcasing weakness, which resulted in the invasion of both Ukraine and Israel. Which is to say neither had an ounce of wisdom. Trump has no honesty? It isn’t Trump who, as Miranda Devine details in her bestselling book, is “The Big Guy.” The “Big Guy,” of course, is Joe Biden. Biden and his web of outright corruption get not a mention in this editorial. But it’s Trump — who has done none of that — whose honesty is said to be lacking? Laughable. Then the Times claims Trump has no “discipline.” Really? The man who doesn’t drink alcohol, the man who built a global business empire from scratch, the man who runs a personal schedule that exhausts those around him — has no discipline?  No restraint? The man who has been subjected to massive attacks of lawfare and a weaponized government and has respectfully complied with instructions — coming from utterly corrupt prosecutors — has shown no restraint? Let’s get real.  In the exact unawareness style of the Left, the Times editorial accuses Trump of the very traits that exemplify the American Left itself, as shown repeatedly by the likes of Harris and Biden. It is, in this election, Harris who has shown a vivid lack of  “wisdom, honesty, empathy, courage, restraint, humility, [and] discipline.” With not a peep of opposition from the Times. Along the way, the Times castigates Trump — not Harris! — for the massively incompetent border crisis that has sent tens of thousands of unvetted illegal migrants across the border into the U.S., resulting in headlines like this one from Fox News:  Tens of thousands of illegal immigrants with sexual assault, murder convictions in US: ICE data ICE provided the new data to lawmakers this week That is not the result of Trump. It is the result of the policies of the Biden–Harris administration. And the Times editorial says Trump — not Harris, who has been running immigration policy! — is the problem? One could go on — and on and on — with the decided untruths of this Times editorial. With the “insurrection” Big Lie that is a left-wing favorite. With the Left’s addiction to running corrupt elections, as documented here in this space.  But the central fact is that old leftist standby: projection. In this case projecting onto former President Trump the traits and actions that are standard operating procedure for the Left and its editorial allies at the New York Times. Ya can’t make it up. Unless, of course, you’re the New York Times Editorial Board. READ MORE: Casey Attacks GOP’s McCormick For Holding Father Gov. Casey’s Pro-Life Views RFK Jr.’s Fight for Principle The post The <i>New York Times</i> Accuses Trump of the Very Traits That Exemplify the Left appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

The Political Book of the Year: Ken Khachigian’s Behind Closed Doors: In the Room With Reagan & Nixon
Favicon 
spectator.org

The Political Book of the Year: Ken Khachigian’s Behind Closed Doors: In the Room With Reagan & Nixon

Behind Closed Doors: In the Room With Reagan & Nixon By Ken Khachigian (Post Hill Press, 496 pages, $35) Ken Khachigian, who worked as an aide and speechwriter to Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, has written a marvelous memoir of those days that will delight political junkies and inform scholars and historians of the period. His book, Behind Closed Doors: In the Room with Reagan & Nixon, transports us back to the finale of the Watergate saga, where he and a few other brave Nixon loyalists sought to convince the president to fight against what the British historian Paul Johnson rightly called a “media putsch,” and what Geoff Shepard has shown to be a political coup de etat by Democrats, the media, the special counsel’s office, and partisan federal judges. When he went to work for Reagan, Khachigian served as a confidential go-between for Nixon and Reagan, which allowed the former but “disgraced” president to secretly funnel political and policy ideas to candidate and President Reagan. Along the way, Khachigian deliciously settles scores with the Nixon aides (especially Al Haig and David Gergen) who were complicit in arranging Nixon’s resignation and those Reagan aides (James Baker, Richard Darman, David Gergen again, Richard Wirthlin, and others) who didn’t want to let Reagan be Reagan in campaigns or as president. Khachigian joined the Nixon administration under the tutelage of Patrick J. Buchanan, the feisty wordsmith and policy adviser who, Khachigian writes, became a “mentor, colleague, and lifelong friend.” Buchanan, like Khachigian, served in both the Nixon and Reagan administrations and, like Khachigian, has remained a steadfast loyalist to both presidents. At the beginning of August 1974, Khachigian was asked to join a “working group” that he thought was convened to save Nixon’s presidency. He soon learned, however, that Nixon’s “forces were folding tents at the first whiffs of gunpowder.” Khachigian wrote a strongly worded and compellingly argued memo to Nixon “pleading that he reject resignation,” but Nixon never got to see the memo. By then, Khachigian writes, Nixon’s defenders inside the White House could be counted on one hand — and he and Buchanan were two of them. Rose Mary Woods, Nixon’s longtime secretary, was another. After Nixon’s resignation, Khachigian joined Nixon’s staff in San Clemente, where he helped shape Nixon’s memoirs and helped prepare him for the famous televised interviews with David Frost. Khachigian relished discussions with Nixon on politics, politicians, world leaders, and personal and political gossip. “Our conversations,” he writes, “were enriched by three decades of [Nixon’s] vast insights, knowledge, and background into the American and international world of politics and government.” Those dialogues with Nixon, Khachigian explains, “would prove indispensable to the success of my relationship with Ronald Reagan.” Nixon early on grasped Reagan’s “genius as a communicator,” and through Khachigian the former president became an unseen confidential adviser to Reagan in his presidential campaigns and his presidency. It was Nixon in 1978 who urged Khachigian to work on Reagan’s campaign for the presidency. Nixon admired Reagan and especially appreciated Reagan’s loyalty to him throughout the turmoils of Vietnam and Watergate. Nixon thought John Connally, who had served as his treasury secretary, was tougher and smarter than Reagan. But he believed Reagan had a better chance of winning because of his unequalled communication skills. Nixon also introduced Khachigian to Stuart Spencer, who had been with Reagan in his California gubernatorial campaigns, but who had worked for President Gerald Ford against Reagan in the 1976 GOP primaries. Khachigian credits Spencer for being the best of Reagan’s campaign strategists. Nixon’s brilliant post-presidential books ensured that his ideas and concepts would remain relevant to global geopolitics and presidential politics. Nixon’s The Real War, for example, was released during the 1980 presidential campaign. His next book, Real Peace, came out in the midst of the 1984 presidential campaign. But having Khachigian inside the Reagan campaign and White House provided Nixon with a direct avenue to advise and influence Reagan’s campaign and presidency. Throughout the book, Khachigian quotes from the memos and letters Nixon sent to Reagan via Khachigian. (Several of those memos and letters appear in the book’s appendix, and are worth reading in full.) And there were phone calls, as well, where Nixon would provide political and policy advice for Reagan through Khachigian. And Nixon undoubtedly had other Reagan campaign and White House staffers that he could utilize as intermediaries for advice to Reagan. Khachigian valued his role as intermediary between Nixon and Reagan because he respected Nixon’s experience, political wisdom, and knowledge about world affairs. Nixon’s advice helped Khachigian navigate the sometimes troubled waters of Reagan’s campaigns and his presidency. The infighting among Reagan’s campaign staff and his administration is well-known, but Khachigian provides an insiders view from someone who shared Reagan’s conservative philosophy. During the 1980 campaign, Khachigian made almost daily recordings of events, personalities, and his perceptions that resulted in a thirty-five thousand word campaign diary. This is invaluable source material because it is not shaped by hindsight. He describes it as “contemporaneous observations [by] an author with a principal role in shaping winning messages and participating in many key campaign decisions at strategic turning points as a senior member of Reagan’s campaign staff.” As the campaign wore on, both Ronald and Nancy Reagan grew more comfortable with Khachigian and more reliant on his role in shaping the campaign’s key messages. The key message of the 1980 campaign was the economy. Nixon urged Khachigian to focus on the poor economic record of the incumbent Carter administration. Inflation, unemployment, and high interest rates were what Americans most cared about. Reagan instinctively understood that. But foreign policy crises, especially the hostage crisis in Iran and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, were also key campaign issues that played in Reagan’s favor. Some Reagan campaign advisers, like James Baker, wanted to soften Reagan’s message, especially when it came to tax cuts. Influenced by economists like Arthur Laffer, scholars like Jude Wanniski, and politicians like Congressman Jack Kemp (who had served with Reagan in California), Reagan had become a supply-sider, arguing that cutting tax rates across the board would increase revenues to the government. Nixon predicted that Reagan would win comfortably as long as the campaign kept the economy front and center. Reagan won a landslide victory. The infighting continued after Reagan was sworn in as president. Khachigian helped draft Reagan’s first inaugural address, which emphasized the goals of scaling-back the federal government, unleashing private enterprise, providing tax relief to all Americans, and combating the Soviet Union. Khachigian refutes the notion that Reagan was a passive president. “The weight of his presence was greater and more emphatic than history has given him credit,” he writes. Reagan was, writes Khachigian, “intensely involved in the minutiae of his challenge.” “We came here to do things differently,” Reagan told his cabinet officers at the first meeting. And, Khachigian notes, Reagan was anything but passive when it came to editing drafts of speeches — that continued throughout his eight years as president. Among Reagan’s top White House staffers, only Ed Meese was philosophically in tune with Reagan’s core beliefs, but Meese was up against Baker, Michael Deaver, David Stockman (OMB Director), pollster Richard Wirthlin, and others who preached “pragmatism” over conservatism. Reagan, Khachigian writes, “was surrounded by accommodationists who convinced themselves that at his core, Reagan was also a pragmatist.” The main villain here, according to Khachigian, was Jim Baker who often falsely claimed credit for Reagan achievements, deflected blame from himself when things didn’t go right, looked to destroy potential rivals within the administration, sometimes hid information from the president, and serially leaked to the media to promote himself and his agenda. But Baker wasn’t the only one. Baker’s deputy Richard Darman was another, as was David Gergen. Later, during Reagan’s second term, Donald Regan, who switched jobs with Baker to become chief of staff (Baker became Treasury Secretary), let his power-hungry ambition get in the way of pursuing the president’s agenda. Khachigian accuses these staffers as having engaged in “duplicity and underhanded conduct,” and refers to them as “little men swaggering in oversized shoes.” Nixon offered advice via Khachigian during the 1984 presidential campaign, especially after Reagan did not do well in the first debate with Democratic candidate Walter Mondale. Nixon said to let Reagan be Reagan, setting forth broad themes and noting the first term’s accomplishments instead of memorizing a bunch of facts and figures. Reagan was so far ahead in the polls, Nixon said, that he could lose both debates and still win the election comfortably. Reagan won the second debate, and duplicated Nixon’s 49-state victory in November. Reagan’s second term was marred by problems — the visit to the West German military cemetery at Bitburg where some SS troops were buried, and the Iran-contra scandal. Reagan had promised German Chancellor Helmut Kohl that he would visit Bitburg as a symbol of healing the wounds of the Second World War which had ended forty years before. When it became known that some SS troops were buried there, Reagan was urged by Holocaust survivors, political leaders, some in the administration, and his wife Nancy to cancel the visit, but Reagan gave his word to Kohl and kept it. He also visited the Bergen-Belsen death camp, where he delivered one of his finest speeches, mostly written by Khachigian. Nixon told Khachigian that Reagan’s Bitburg visit showed strength and political courage that Soviet leaders would understand. Reagan survived the political and legal slings and arrows thrown at him during the Iran–Contra scandal, despite what Khachigian describes as “the rush from Reagan’s ranks to deride and ridicule him … that gave good names to rats leaving the sinking ship.” There was an “unconstrained flow of leaks” to the press, including, according to Khachigian, pollster Wirthlin providing the press with polling data that showed the public believed Reagan was lying and hiding information about the scandal. After the scandal subsided, writes Khachigian, Reagan “renewed his crusade and moved forward to shatter the Soviet empire.” Khachigian makes clear that during campaigns and his presidency, Reagan’s most trusted adviser was his wife Nancy. He credits Nancy and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher with persuading Reagan to shift from Soviet hardliner to negotiator-in-chief after Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in the Soviet Union. Khachigian noticed the change when Reagan edited some of his speeches in a way that toned down the usual “evil empire” rhetoric. Nancy was determined to erase the notion that her husband was a “warmonger.” She needn’t have worried. Reagan won the Cold War without firing a shot. Toward the end of this fascinating memoir, Khachigian settles one more score — this time with Ken Duberstein, who served as Reagan’s last chief of staff. Reagan had asked Khachigian to draft his Farewell Address, but Duberstein at Nancy Reagan’s insistence had Peggy Noonan draft it. Duberstein never informed Khachigian about the change; he only learned of it from Mari Maseng decades later when he was writing this book. Khachigian doubts that Duberstein ever informed Nancy that Khachigian was supposed to draft the address. At least Darman “wielded his knives frontally in open daylight,” Khachigian writes. “Duberstein preferred to slide the stiletto in the still of night.” In the book’s final chapter, Khachigian recounts being at a meeting with Nixon and Reagan at the dedication of Nixon’s presidential library in July 1990. It was a meeting of political giants — lions who “had shaped three decades of the twentieth century.” They talked of serious things — communist infiltration of the country in the 1940s and 1950s; past political campaigns; and the anticipated end of the Cold War. Both of those presidents contributed greatly to the Cold War’s end and, thereby, preserved the freedom and liberty of America and the West. Khachigian’s final thought summarizes this great book: “What wonderful good fortune for me to have been at their service, and, for the country, for each of them to have served.” The post The Political Book of the Year: Ken Khachigian’s <i>Behind Closed Doors: In the Room With Reagan & Nixon</i> appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

California’s Billion-Dollar Stem Cell Initiatives End in Failure
Favicon 
spectator.org

California’s Billion-Dollar Stem Cell Initiatives End in Failure

Twenty years ago, in the run-up to the 2004 election, Californians faced a vote on Proposition 71, the Stem Cell Research Initiative. The ballot measure promised life-saving cures and therapies for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and other diseases through embryonic stem cell research. “Seventy-one will support research to find cures for diseases that affect millions of people,” said actor Michael J. Fox in an ad, “including cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Please support the effort to find cures…. It could save the life of someone you love.” Christopher Reeve also got in the act. “My foundation supports cutting-edge research. And we are proud supporters of Prop 71,” Reeve said in the ad. “Stem cells have already cured paralysis in animals. Stem cells are the future of medicine. Please support Prop 71. And, stand up for those that can’t. Thank you.” Also on board was Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, whose father-in-law, Sargent Shriver, was afflicted with Alzheimer’s. With this all-star lineup, the measure passed 59.5 to 40.95, but there was more to it than grandiose promises. Proposition 71 ponied up $3 billion for California researchers — nearly $300 million annually for 10 years — with $6 billion to pay back. On the institutional side, the proposition created the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). The prime mover was Democrat insider and real estate tycoon Robert Klein, who wrote the measure to install himself as chairman, and required a 70 percent supermajority of both houses to make any structural or policy changes. In 2012, it emerged that CIRM was handing out more than 90 percent of its grants to institutions with representatives on its governing board. State Attorney General Kamala Harris ignored this blatant conflict of interest. Klein also claimed that a steady stream of fees and royalties would make CIRM self-supporting. Trouble was, the state stem-cell agency reported no royalties until 2018, and only in the amount of $190,345.87. That is less than the salary of former state senator Art Torres, a non-scientist CIRM hired when a biotech professional was willing to work for no salary at all. That same year, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, “not a single federally approved therapy has resulted from CIRM-funded science. The predicted financial windfall has not materialized.” With royalties only chump change and none of the promised cures in the offing, the institute that was supposed to be self-supporting went back to the voters. By this time celebrity support had disappeared, but CIRM bosses made a plan. Americans for Cures, a nonprofit headed by Robert Klein floated Proposition 14, the Stem Cell Research Institute Bond Initiative, this time for $5.5 billion in general obligation bonds. As this writer twice verified, signature gatherers falsely claimed the measure sought only $1.5 billion. As the deadline approached, Americans for Cures Vice President Don Reed began pushing for people to print out 16 pages and mail in the signatures. Secretary of State Alex Padilla ignored any fraud in the process and approved the measure for the November ballot. Proposition 14 passed by 51.09 to 48.91, a far cry from 2004. Last year, according to MIT Technology Review, “after 25 years of hype, embryonic stem cells have yet to reach their moment.” CIRM now claims, “We have supported research that has led to a cure for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), a deadly immune disorder.” CIRM-funded scientists are working on a “wide variety of diseases,” including “heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, among others.” In 2024, a ballpark figure for CIRM’s promised life-saving cures and therapies is zero. False promises are nothing new, but seldom have they been institutionalized in such a form, with such massive waste. If California is to conduct meaningful reform, it will have to be all about memory against forgetting. Lloyd Billingsley is a policy fellow at the Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif. READ MORE: Report Rips Biden–Harris Labor Secretary Julie Su California Democrat Defects Over School Choice The post California’s Billion-Dollar Stem Cell Initiatives End in Failure appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

The Digital Puppeteers: Big Tech’s Influence on Society
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

The Digital Puppeteers: Big Tech’s Influence on Society

by Peter Schiff, Schiff Gold: Tech companies have revolutionized the modern age, allowing for transcontinental communication, instant access to information, and unprecedented connectivity between people worldwide. But this revolution has come at a cost; these companies have undue influence over our lives, possessing the capability to shape public discourse, consumer behavior, and even political outcomes. […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Milei’s Approval Rating Is Still Above 50 Percent Despite Inflation
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Milei’s Approval Rating Is Still Above 50 Percent Despite Inflation

by Mish Shedlock, Mish Talk: Inflation is in Argentina is still high. Yet, President Javier Milei approval rating is still above 50 percent. Why? And what about the US? What’s the Proper Focus? Should we focus on Milei’s disapproval rating or approval rating? I suggest the latter. Donald Trump (46%), Joe Biden (40%), Kamala Harris […]
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Jen Psaki Praises Doug Emhoff For "Reshaping" Masculinity in Interview, with Victor Davis Hanson
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 9987 out of 56669
  • 9983
  • 9984
  • 9985
  • 9986
  • 9987
  • 9988
  • 9989
  • 9990
  • 9991
  • 9992
  • 9993
  • 9994
  • 9995
  • 9996
  • 9997
  • 9998
  • 9999
  • 10000
  • 10001
  • 10002

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund