Women’s Fencing is the latest sport to be corrupted by gender-deluded men snatching the win. A 39-year-old male named “Annika Rose” Suchoski has only been fencing for nine months, but still placed second in Ontario’s Fortune Fencing Regional Championships. He came out of left field, beating biological women who had been competing for years, according to the Daily Mail. This was Suchoski’s first tournament since taking up the sport. He reportedly began “transitioning” to a female in 2018, and underwent sex change surgery only two years ago. Fans online expressed outrage, describing how Suchoski’s height and features as a (still) biological male give him the advantages of longer reach and more upper body strength. Related: FX's 'English Teacher’ Brings Drag Queen to School to Teach Male Students How to Perform in Drag He was also called out as a “cheat” multiple times, the Daily Mail reports. But Suchoski merely called it a “tough competition,” patting himself on the back for winning a “difficult” tournament.  Perhaps he should ask all the experienced women he stepped on how “difficult” it was for them.  But Suchoski isn’t the first male to disrupt a women’s fencing competition. American fencer Liz Kocab won his eighth title as a man in a women’s competition last October. This comes after the sport's official organization, Fencing USA, vowed to support “transgender” and “nonbinary” athletes as both a “moral and ethical imperative.”  It appears no sport is safe anymore from the moral superiority of virtue-signalers who will place women at a disadvantage once again, all in the name of "social progress." Follow MRCTV on X! Judo athlete banned from competing for making the sign of the cross. https://t.co/GVc6R8VMOG — MRCTV (@mrctv) September 24, 2024  

Remember that infamous George Soros-backed group exposed by the Media Research Center for controlling race-obsessed Soros-backed prosecutors? A damning new report now accuses them of hypocritically fostering racism within their own office. The Daily Wire Investigative Reporter Luke Rosiak spoke with Fair and Just Prosecution employees about how their executive director, Miriam Krinsky, reportedly runs the office in an “authoritarian” manner, hypocritically embracing the very tactics and rhetoric in the office that she denounces publicly. The sources accuse Krinsky of being “racist and abusive” in the office, Rosiak reported in a Sept. 20 article. “The FJP staff’s experience corresponds with what conservatives have long said about the Soros judicial philosophy: that it pushes lax policies against traditional crime but draconian enforcement against critics and political opponents,” Rosiak wrote. The sources’ remarks were damning. “The workplace culture under Miriam’s leadership is oppressively authoritarian,” an employee affirmed in an interview. “Miriam manipulates a predominantly young, minority staff—exploiting their inexperience and the existing racial dynamics within the organization to tighten her grip on power.” As cited by Rosiak, the MRC Report detailed how notoriously leftist groups like FJP control and direct prosecutors to implement billionaire George Soros’s anti-police philosophy. Soros has succeeded in electing 126 leftist prosecutors across the country. The MRC acquired nearly 8,000 internal documents demonstrating how FJP and other groups push these Soros-funded prosecutors to sign their petitions, accept their staff recommendations and attend “mandatory” meetings.  According to Rosiak’s sources, current and former employees are afraid of exposing FJP over retaliatory actions, including wrongful termination and even legal threats. “Disturbingly, the organization has even orchestrated fake wellness checks as a means to weaponize the police—the same police they advocate should be defunded,” Rosiak wrote.  FJP’s hypocritical attitude—ignoring alleged internal racism while reportedly using police for intimidation—contrasts jarringly with the organization’s fixation on defunding the police. As noted by Rosiak, this hypocrisy is also a microcosm of how the FJP’s pet prosecutors approach justice in their communities, providing leniency to criminals and persecution to normal people and political enemies.  FJP is viciously anti-cop. One of FJP’s policy recommendations for its “New Vision For Justice” directly calls for state and local officials to defund their respective police departments and reallocate the resources elsewhere. In addition, FJP has sent celebratory emails at least twelve times after one of their pet prosecutors indicated or convicted a police officer.  Under Krinsky’s leadership, FJP is now at odds with one of these pet prosecutors. After FJP asked Soros prosecutors to promote their group on social media, DeKalb County District Attorney Sherry Boston, a Soros-backed prosecutor, dutifully followed these instructions, posting a sample tweet nearly verbatim. Rosiak highlighted Krinsky’s subsequent treatment of Boston after the DA  complained about being excluded from a New York City event.  “Krinsky, who is white, replied by disparaging Boston and saying she was excluded from events because of merit, not race,” Rosiak wrote. “Krinsky appeared to suggest that Boston, a black Democrat, had failed to advance ‘racial justice’ by prosecuting too many crimes.” Conservatives are under attack! Contact ABC News (818) 460-7477, CBS News (212) 975-3247 and NBC News (212) 664-6192 and demand they report Soros’ connections to radical district attorneys throughout the country.

Having seen World News Tonight anchor David Muir and streaming anchor Linsey Davis put on the horribly biased debate performance and correspondents Mary Bruce and Rachel Scott frequently shoveling anti-Trump drivel and pro-Kamala propaganda, ABC’s Good Morning America crew decided to do its part for the left on Tuesday by continuing to promote Trump-Russia collusion through the lens of a new book by two of the probe’s top lackeys.     Co-host and former Clinton official George Stephanopoulos swooned: We are back with the first look at the new book Interference: The Inside Story of Trump, Russia, and the Mueller Investigation. Two of the co-authors — Aaron Zebley, who was Mueller’s top deputy and Andrew Goldstein, a lead prosecutor — are here talking for the first time about how they investigated President Trump and the dangers of election interference right now. He first went to Zebley with a softball: “And, Aaron, why don’t you start and talk about why it was so important for you to write this book. Because we all saw the report several years ago.” Zebley gave the resistance wine moms what they wanted, which was continuing to rehash the 2016 election and, with a wink and a nudge, question Trump’s legitimacy: We thought it was important right now because there are — there are two key messages in the book. One that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. And, with recent public reports, we think they’re continuing to do that now. And then, it’s also very important that there be a mechanism to investigate presidents and the book describes how we did that. Stephanopoulos — an ardent liberal who’s publicly and privately called for Americans to reject Trump — reacted with childish lament that Americans still “call” the Mueller probe “the Russia hoax.” Goldstein took this one, declaring “it wasn’t — it wasn’t a hoax” and argued “Russia interfered in the election in 2016 in sweeping fashion” and that it’s happening in 2024 (meaning Trump has a chance to win). Goldstein dropped the funniest line of the whole segment: “[I]t’s important for American elections to be decided by Americans and not by foreign adversaries.” So, by “Americans” did Goldstein mean the corporate media and intelligence agencies? Stephanopoulos continued to help sell this grift of a book, boasting it “take[s] aim at William Barr, the attorney general” for his summary of their report. Stephanopoulos used some of the remaining time to rehash the report with Goldstein noting that, while they didn’t find an official “criminal conspiracy between the President, or his campaign, and Russia”, they unearthed “many links and outreach that the Russian government made.” The devout partisan wrapped with questions about this “important book” by worrying another probe of a president along the lines of what Mueller’s team did couldn’t happen again thanks to the Supreme Court and what Americans should “know...about...foreign interference” (click “expand”): STEPHANOPOULOS: Since — since the report came out and in this election cycle, we saw the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity. Given the findings of the Supreme Court, the conclusions of the Supreme Court, could an investigation like the one you conducted even happen today? GOLDSTEIN: It may not be. And one of the reasons we think the book has special relevance now is we document how we conducted what we think was a fair, fast, principled investigation and that kind of investigation into potential misconduct by a president might not be able to be done again. STEPHANOPOULOS: And what’s the most important thing for Americans to know right now about what foreign — what kind of foreign interference is taking place and what we can do about it? ZEBLEY: To be aware of it. It — it is happening. Andrew just said that the Russia election interference scheme was not a hoax. It really happened. It’s happening now. There are other adversaries who appear to be interfering. Iranians. There are reports as recently as today — that people need to be aware that it’s happen. To see the relevant ABC transcript from September 24, click “expand.” ABC’s Good Morning America September 24, 2024 8:36 a.m. Eastern [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: First on GMA; Mueller Prosecutors Talk New Book; “The Inside Story of Trump, Russia and the Mueller Investigation”] GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: We are back with the first look at the new book Interference: The Inside Story of Trump, Russia, and the Mueller Investigation. Two of the co-authors — Aaron Zebley, who was Mueller’s top deputy and Andrew Goldstein, a lead prosecutor — are here talking for the first time about how they investigated President Trump and the dangers of election interference right now. Thank you guys both for coming in. And, Aaron, why don’t you start and talk about why it was so important for you to write this book. Because we all saw the report several years ago. AARON ZEBLEY: We thought it was important right now because there are — there are two key messages in the book. One that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. And, with recent public reports, we think they’re continuing to do that now. And then, it’s also very important that there be a mechanism to investigate presidents and the book describes how we did that. STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s the story you want to tell. One of the thing we’ve heard from former President Trump and his allies for the last several years — and it’s become almost a cliche — they call this the Russia hoax. ANDREW GOLDSTEIN: And it wasn’t — wasn’t a hoax. The — Russia interfered in the election in 2016 in sweeping fashion. We document that both in the report and in the book. And we know that it is happening now and it’s important for American elections to be decided by Americans and not by foreign adversaries. STEPHANOPOULOS: Part of the reason this ended up the way it did is what happened is immediately after you all released your report and the attorney general basically came close, he didn’t use the word exoneration, but said he wasn’t going to continue to prosecute former President Trump — President Trump at the time and you take aim at William Barr, the attorney general in this book. ZEBLEY: Yeah, we do. What happened when we delivered the report is that the attorney general did not release our report immediately and instead released his own summary, which we think mischaracterized the full extent of our work. And we think that led to some confuse about what we had actually done and what we had actually found. STEPHANOPOULOS: We keep hearing this word — the President uses the word no — no collusion. He calls it — he calls this a hoax. What exactly did you document about the ties between Donald Trump and Russia? GOLDSTEIN: We were looking to see whether there was a criminal conspiracy between the President, or his campaign, and Russia. We did not establish that there was a conspiracy, but the report — in our book, we document the many links and outreach that the Russian government made while they were conducting their interference campaign. They were reaching out to the Trump campaign to let them know they were helping. STEPHANOPOULOS: Is there anything you believe you could have done differently in order to prevent the mischaracterization of what happened in the report? ZEBLEY: If we had to do it over again, I might think through how we delivered the report and do that in a different manner. Maybe deliver it ready for — for release immediately. It’s contrary to how prosecutors typically document results of an investigation, but I might do that differently. STEPHANOPOULOS: Since — since the report came out and in this election cycle, we saw the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity. Given the findings of the Supreme Court, the conclusions of the Supreme Court, could an investigation like the one you conducted even happen today? GOLDSTEIN: It may not be. And one of the reasons we think the book has special relevance now is we document how we conducted what we think was a fair, fast, principled investigation and that kind of investigation into potential misconduct by a president might not be able to be done again. STEPHANOPOULOS: And what’s the most important thing for Americans to know right now about what foreign — what kind of foreign interference is taking place and what we can do about it? ZEBLEY: To be aware of it. It — it is happening. Andrew just said that the Russia election interference scheme was not a hoax. It really happened. It’s happening now. There are other adversaries who appear to be interfering. Iranians. There are reports as recently as today — that people need to be aware that it’s happen. STEPHANOPOULOS: Thank you both for coming in. It’s an important book. It’s called Interference: The Inside Story of Trump, Russia, and the Mueller Investigation. It’s out now.

The days of the legacy media are numbered, and Piers Morgan is here for it. “Generally speaking, people no longer perceive CNN as the voice that people go to for utterly impartial news coverage, and that is a shame for the brand,” Morgan tells Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report.” “They’ve got an identity struggle, which is ironic given how much they bang on about identities,” he adds. “Do you think it matters anymore in a certain respect whether CNN or anything from the mainstream media survives?” Rubin asks. “I know we’re all going off into our own little corridor, and there’s some danger there, but does it really matter whether the New York Times or Washington Post or CNN survive this thing?” Morgan doesn’t believe it matters in the slightest. “It’ll be like every jungle, survival of the fittest,” he tells Rubin, adding that none of his sons — who are 31, 27, and 23 — watch legacy media. “None of them watch linear television. If they do, they do it through the YouTube app. I read the other day that 10% of American television watchers who have a TV set, a smart TV, they watch television through the YouTube app. And only 23% watch network television on their smart TV,” Morgan explains. “In five years' time, YouTube is highly likely to be the number one thing that people use as an app on their smart TV,” he adds. Want more from Dave Rubin?To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cornell University took a hard line against anti-Israel rioters in a statement about a protest that disrupted a career fair at the college campus in Ithaca, New York. The Cornell Coalition for Mutual Liberation took responsibility for the demonstration Wednesday meant to prevent college students from getting hired at defense companies involved in the Israel war on Hamas terrorists in the Gaza Strip. 'This behavior is unacceptable, a violation of university policy, and illegal.' “We are stopping Cornell University students from going to jobs in genocide. The Coalition for Mutual Liberation would view that as a success,” said CML spokesperson Yihun Stith. According to a statement from Cornell and videos available on social media, the protest grew violent and intimidating to attendees at the fair. "Cornell Police officers were pushed and shoved. Guests of the university felt threatened. And students were denied their ability to experience the Career Fair," read a statement from Joel Malina, the vice president for university relations. "This behavior is unacceptable, a violation of university policy, and illegal," he added. Malina went on to say that Cornell police were working to identify the students involved and they could face suspension as a consequence, while faculty and staff involved would be referred to human resources. "These individuals will also be subject to potential criminal charges," Malina added. Stith said the protesters had been nonviolent and claimed that “no immense cop interaction happened.”In 2023, a Cornell professor told the board of trustees that faculty there was "extremely anti-Israel" and called on the board to discontinue its efforts to implement DEI policies that could worsen extremism on campus. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Author J.K. Rowling — who has become a favorite target of leftists who attack her for speaking out against the transgender agenda — just issued the perfect response to a woke keyboard warrior who told the author on X, "My kids and I enjoyed burning your books."That wasn't all the leftist detractor said. While Rowling blotted out the individual's information in the post, leaving only the user's rainbow emoji and the date and time of the post, she included the full message."You are a stupid and horrible woman," the individual declared. "My kids and I enjoyed burning your books and roasting marshmallows over your pathetic books."Rowling also is known for her cutting wit amid such sociopolitical dustups, and she didn't disappoint here: "I get the same royalties whether you read them or burn them. Enjoy your marshmallows!" Rowling added a blow-a-kiss emoji for good measure.Rowling — who boasts over 14 million followers on X — has received over 50,000 likes in an hour (and counting) for her retort. The following are but a handful of them:"Aren’t book burners the bad guys in pretty much every history book ever?" one commenter wondered — after which Rowling responded, "And every last one of them believed they were on the right side of history.""This clap back is glorious," another commenter declared."Ahhh the layers of burn in this tweet [are] pretty epic," another commenter observed."These attacks aren’t coming from smart people," another user noted. "Smart people would realize considering opinions that differ from your own is how you get smarter.""Wait a minute. The books are great. This is an objective fact. No amount of hatred for you can change that," another commenter observed. "Just like no amount of hormones can change a man into a woman.""No words to express how much I admire J.K. Rowling," another user stated.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Sometimes it’s really easy to nail down what a game is. It’s like Elden Ring, or it’s like Skyrim, and you’re easily able to encapsulate exactly what it is that’s brilliant about a title. Then there are games like Dark Sky, which is out now, which combine so many different genres and influences together, and you really begin to struggle. Continue reading New sci-fi RPG deckbuilder Dark Sky is full of rich tactical combat MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best card games, Best RPGs, Best turn-based strategy games

'Shame on Her': Joe Manchin Will Not Endorse Kamala Harris After Filibuster Threat

Haitian Bridge Alliance Laughably Seeks Criminal Charges Against Trump/Vance for 'Eating Pets' Narrative

Kamala's Campaign CRUMBLES? Couple of Cookie Polls Have Trump Up BIGLY