Ultimate Bunny is a rather sought after Descendant in The First Descendant due to… reasons. Here’s how to get her. This is a character, not a skin, so you’ll have to research and earn Ultimate Bunny like any other Descendant in The First Descendant. She is much more powerful than Bunny, so you can use that as your excuse for unlocking her. How to unlock Ultimate Bunny in The First Descendant Ultimate Bunny has a very long list of items that are needed before you can unlock her. You’ll be playing this game for a long time. Here is everything you need to unlock Ultimate Bunny: 900,000 Gold Ultimate Bunny Enhanced Cells 450,000 Gold 949 Repton 919 Ceramic Composite 73 Encrypted Neural Circuit Ultimate Bunny Enhanced Cells Blueprint Ultimate Bunny Stabilizer 450,000 Gold 1,285 Superfluid 869 Hardener 102 Specialized Biometal Ultimate Bunny Stabilizer Blueprint Ultimate Bunny Spiral Catalyst 450,000 Gold 1,2...

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., says she intends to file articles of impeachment against Supreme Court justices. The Supreme Court ruled Monday in Trump v. United States that presidents have immunity from prosecution pertaining to “official acts” taken in office. Afterward, Ocasio-Cortez said in a post on X that she intends to file articles of impeachment against the justices and that the high court has been ”consumed by a corruption crisis beyond its control.” “Today’s ruling represents an assault on American democracy,” the New York Democrat wrote. “It is up to Congress to defend our nation from this authoritarian capture.” The Supreme Court has become consumed by a corruption crisis beyond its control.Today’s ruling represents an assault on American democracy. It is up to Congress to defend our nation from this authoritarian capture.I intend on filing articles of impeachment upon our return.— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) July 1, 2024 Trump was indicted August 2023 on four felony counts related to an alleged effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The Supreme Court decided in the 6-3 ruling issued Monday that Trump is entitled to “at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts” and maintained that “there is no immunity for unofficial acts.” The majority opinion was written by Chief Justice John Roberts, who was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh. Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined in part. The dissenting opinion was written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation The post AOC Pledges to File Articles of Impeachment Against Supreme Court Justices appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Carville: "Vox Populi!"

The US Supreme Court has killed a crucial 40-year-old legal precedent that empowered federal agencies to interpret laws and to decide on the best ways to implement them. Now, if there is a dispute over ambiguous language in laws that could be addressed by deferring to agency expertise, federal judges can simply decide what it means by themselves.In short, judges can now expand their role into policymaking and will have profound impacts on a range of areas, from environmental protection to food regulation and workplace safety.  What is the Chevron deference?The so-called Chevron deference was established in 1984 by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council. It was essentially a dispute over how the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) interpreted provisions of the 1977 Clean Air Act that regulated power plants.At the time, the EPA under President Ronald Reagan’s administration was more interested in deregulation that favored industry, rather than decreasing pollution, so it proffered interpretations of the Clean Air Act that were to the liking of facility owners. This interpretation was challenged by environmental groups, but the court ultimately ruled in favour of the EPA. In doing so, they established a two-step process for deciding how federal courts should address disputes.In essence, if Congress has been clear on what it intends with a law, then courts have no place to intervene. However, if there is ambiguity in the language or gaps, then courts should defer to agency expertise and interpretations, but only if they are reasonable and evidentially grounded.Ever since then, the deference has been applied in thousands of cases where government regulations affect anything from health and safety or climate change to business operations, schooling, the environment, and so on. However, the new ruling brings this to an end. A definitive nail in the coffin.What happened? The Chevron deference was killed by a dispute between a New England fishing company and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, challenged part of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, which sets limits to prevent overfishing and also requires fishing companies to pay for inspectors to be on board to monitor their compliance.In this case, Loper Bright argued that the NMFS had no right to force this cost. At first, a district court ruled that the NMFS did have the right, stating that Congress had empowered it to do so – the Chevron deference. However, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court in 2023, and we now know what they ruled.The 6-3 ruling allows judges to make their own decisions without the need to defer to the scientific expertise of relevant agencies.“Agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do,” Chief Justice John Roberts said.The decision is a considerable success for Conservatives who have been trying to overturn the precedent for decades. They had objected to its existence on the basis that, by giving executive agencies the freedom to implement laws, federal bureaucracies had too much power.In a dissent from the ruling, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that: “In one fell swoop, the majority today gives itself exclusive power over every open issue – no matter how expertise-driven or policy-laden – involving the meaning of regulatory law.”“As if it did not have enough on its plate, the majority turns itself into the country’s administrative czar.”One of the concerns for those who urged the high court to keep the Chevron doctrine is that the ruling will usher in a new era of administrative chaos. Courts are not likely equipped to address this form of decision-making, lacking the necessary scientific or technical knowledge experts in agencies had. It ultimately changes the foundations upon which scientific information is used in federal policymaking.Kagan offered examples of the types of technical questions judges will now need to decide on themselves. For instance, the Food and Drug Administration must decide what qualifies as a protein in relation to regulating biological products. Or, in regard to the Endangered Species Act, experts within the Fish and Wildlife Service need to determine what a “distinct population segment” is when considering plants and animals that are at risk.Looking forward, it is likely we will now see more judges from across the country weighing in on what the federal government does. It will also likely mean that Congress will have to write more explicit instructions in their laws that clearly define what agencies need to do to implement them. This in itself will probably result in further confusion as larger agencies try to carry out different programs.

Wherever American energy production and innovation are on the rise, legacy media stands in opposition yelling “stop.” In a July 1 segment of CBS Mornings, Environmental correspondent Ben Tracy aired out the frustrations of climate activists upset over the rapid expansion of liquefied natural gas (LNG) production in the United States. During the segment, Tracy nearly entirely ignored the enormous benefits of cheap and abundant energy. This massive expansion comes despite the Biden Administration’s restrictive pause on new liquified oil and gas projects. Tracy reported this tremendous news for the American people as a negative, due to alleged ‘climate change.’  Tracy explained that the number of U.S. LNG export terminals is dramatically increasing. “This is one of eight operating LNG terminals in the U.S. Seven more are under construction. U.S. Capacity has more than tripled since 2018 and is expected to double again by 2030,” Tracy said. He specifically noted this increase is all much to the dismay of the climate cult. “This unprecedented boom worries climate activists who call the new LNG plants carbon bombs,” Tracy lashed out. “Natural gas, while considered cleaner than coal, produces both carbon dioxide and methane emissions that are rapidly warming the planet.” Tracy framed a new LNG plant as a “goliath” during an interview with a local landowner opposing its construction.  The closest CBS Mornings came to acknowledging that our society desperately needs cheap and abundant energy sources like natural gas was when Tracy read one solitary comment by Venture Global LNG. “[T]he world needs more energy, specifically natural gas,” the company reportedly told CBS. CBS also featured a brief clip from an interview with Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm who defended Biden’s LNG pause. This is far from the only action Biden has taken to harm American energy. Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency recently passed a rule that CNN Climate Correspondent Bill Wehr said is designed to not only shutter existing coal plants, but also to place new burdens on new natural gas plants. The Biden Administration has also restricted drilling in Alaska, and reversed several of former President Donald Trump’s pro-energy executive orders. Despite the success of LNG in the present, American Petroleum Institute CEO Mike Sommers has warned that there will be severe future ramifications to Biden’s decision to discourage investment in oil and gas production.  Conservatives are under attack! Contact CBS News at 212-975-3247 and demand they hold Biden and his cronies accountable for attempting to restrict fossil fuel production and Americans’ choices.

Pretty much any part of history can provide us with lessons for survival. After all, the history of mankind is a history of survival. The post Survival Lessons from Roman Legionnaires appeared first on Survivopedia.

Tennessee has joined Florida in enabling trial judges and juries to put child rapists six feet under. State House Majority Leader William Lamberth introduced House Bill 1663 in January. Republicans managed to pass the legislation in both chambers despite Democratic opposition. State Rep. Aftyn Behn (Nashville), one of the bill's Democratic critics, insisted that the "death penalty is incompatible with the right to life." Behn, a pro-abortion advocate, suggested further that "it violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment and guarantees of due process of law and equal protection under the law." Behn also suggested that that victims might be less likely to report crimes if they knew their abusers would be sentenced to death. Lamberth responded to Behn, saying, "Directly from a survivor: 'My sister and I were abused by my father from a very young age. I just want you to know that I appreciate you pushing for the death penalty. I don't think it will stop people from telling about their abuse.' ... She's lived it. I trust her." Florida Republicans faced similar opposition from leftists over their child-rapist death penalty law. The leftist blog TruthOut denounced the legislation, suggesting the law was the result of an "anti-LGBTQ" legislative campaign and claiming further that the death penalty is "one of the most explicitly lethal manifestations of institutional racism and oppression." TheBody, an HIV resource blog, also suggested the legislation could be dangerous for LGBT people. Seattle Gay News expressed concern that the legislation could set the stage for the execution of persons who subject children to "gender-affirming" genital mutilations as well as those deemed to be "child groomers." After Tennessee Republicans overcame the opposition of Behn and other Democrats, Gov. Bill Lee (R) ratified the legislation on May 9. 'If someone rapes one of our children, they forfeit their own life.' Previously, an adult pedophile convicted of rape of a child aged 8-13 in the state would be looking at serving between 15-60 years in prison for a Class A felony. An adult pedophile convicted of aggravated rape of a child 8 or younger would necessarily receive life imprisonment without parole. Now, in the first case of child rape, the sentence must necessarily be death, imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole, or life imprisonment. In the second case of aggravated child rape, the sentence must be death or imprisonment for life without parole. If a jury cannot agree on a punishment, then the trial judge is to default to a sentence of life without parole for a child rapist. The law also states that defendants with intellectual disabilities cannot be sentenced to death. Ahead of his bill's passage, Lamberth noted, "We're going to protect our children in the state of Tennessee. If someone rapes one of our children, they forfeit their own life," reported the Tennessean. "Life in prison for these evil people is simply too good," added Lamberth. While the law went into effect Monday, it remains in a kind of limbo on account of Gov. Lee's moratorium on executions. In May 2022, Lee learned the state had not properly checked lethal drugs for bacterial contamination and called for an independent review. That said, Lee indicated the penalty remains on the table on a case-to-case basis. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Kennedy v. Louisiana that the Eighth Amendment prohibits states from executing child rapists in cases where the crime did not result and was not intended to result in the death of the child. Justices Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and the late Antonin Scalia dissented. Justice Alito, who wrote the dissenting opinion, noted, "The Court today holds that the Eighth Amendment categorically prohibits the imposition of the death penalty for the crime of raping a child. This is so, according to the Court, no matter how young the child, no matter how many times the child is raped, no matter how many children the perpetrator rapes, no matter how sadistic the crime, no matter how much physical or psychological trauma is inflicted, and no matter how heinous the perpetrator’s prior criminal record may be." Justice Alito stressed that the two reasons offered by the liberal majority on the court for this conclusion — that that there was a "national consensus" that the death penalty is not an acceptable punishment for child rape and that such a penalty is inconsistent with the "evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society" — were "unsound." After poking holes in the majority's opinion, Alito underscored that the Eighth Amendment is not a "one-way ratchet that prohibits legislatures from adopting new capital punishment statutes to meet new problems" and that "child rapists exhibit the epitome of moral depravity," inflicting "grievous injury on victims and on society in general." Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), who ratified House Bill 1297 last year imposing the death penalty for pedophiles who commit sexual battery against children under 12, made expressly clear that he is prepared to take the law "all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to overrule judicial precedents which have unjustly shielded child rapists from the death penalty and denied victims and their loved ones the opportunity to pursue ultimate justice against these most heinous criminals." Tennessee state Sen. Jack Johnson (R) also expressed confidence in April that the high court would rule in favor of the child-rapist execution bill he supported. "Given the makeup of the current court, there is a strong possibility that Kennedy v. Louisiana could be overturned," wrote Johnson. "I feel very certain that the Supreme Court believes there is a strong, compelling state interest to protect children, and we believe this Court will support Tennessee's efforts." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Someone's NERVOUS --> Liz Cheney SNAPS at Trump for Posting Meme That Hits TOO CLOSE to Home for Her

'Tone-Deaf Political DISASTER'! CNN Sr. Political Commentator Savagely TEARS Into Biden and Dems (Watch)

Yesterday, Funko Fusion developer 10:10 Games announced that it would be collaborating with Valve's popular first-person shooter, Team Fortress 2. The collaboration will see all Steam players receive special Heavy, Scout, Medic, and Engineer characters for free as a thank-you from the development team.