YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login

  • Day mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

History Traveler
History Traveler
2 yrs

Who Are the Zapatistas? Unmasking Mexico’s Indigenous Guerrilla Army
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Who Are the Zapatistas? Unmasking Mexico’s Indigenous Guerrilla Army

  The Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional (Zapatista Army of National Liberation) or EZLN is an Indigenous insurgent group in southern Mexico fighting for the rights of Indigenous Mexicans. The group is based in Chiapas, Mexico’s poorest state, and began its rebellion against the Mexican government on January 1, 1994. During this uprising, the Zapatistas gained control over a significant area of Chiapas, which they have since governed as an autonomous zone, free from the control of the Mexican state. The EZLN’s actions marked a critical moment in Indigenous Mexicans’ fight for autonomy, rights, and recognition.   Historical Background: Mayans and Marxists Zapatistas on the 26th anniversary of the uprising, by Anya Briy, 2020. Source: openDemocracy.   In the early hours of January 1, 1994, masked and armed EZLN insurgents marched down from the Indigenous highlands of Chiapas and took control of four important cities in the state, including its largest one, San Cristóbal de las Casas. As some Zapatista rebels engaged the Mexican army and police in gunfights, others distributed flyers, delivered speeches, and burned public records thought to be harmful to Indigenous farmers. As Mexican forces launched a counterattack, the rebels retreated to the mountains and jungles they had emerged from, preparing their next moves.   The Zapatista uprising was not impulsive; it was the result of years of planning and preparation. The roots of this movement can be found in 500 years of colonial exploitation in the largely Mayan regions of Chiapas, as well as the leftist uprisings in the urban areas of Mexico during the late 20th century.   In the summer of 1983, two revolutionary movements converged in the remote Lacandon Jungle of Chiapas. Local Maya peasants, who had been deprived of their lands and rights for centuries, joined with urban intellectual guerrilla militants of the National Liberation Front (FLN), who had recently arrived in Chiapas after fleeing state repression in the cities. The Maya aimed to put an end to the historical injustices of colonialism and its impact on the majority-Indigenous highlands of Chiapas. The Marxist guerrillas aimed to spark a proletarian revolutionary fervor by channeling the traditional grievances of the Maya. Together, they founded the EZLN and, by the early 1990s, had begun gathering weapons and setting up concealed training camps in the jungles of Chiapas.   Subcomandante Marcos, a leading spokesperson of the EZLN, by AFP, 2014. Source: BBC.   Meanwhile, officials in Washington and Mexico City were discussing a new trade policy, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which would be enacted together with the 1992 amendment of Article 27 of the 1991 Mexican Constitution. This amendment strengthened private property rights, enabling the privatization of ejidos, or agricultural parcels of communal land owned by the state and managed collectively by local farmers. These measures posed serious threats to the economic livelihoods of smallholder farmers, particularly Indigenous ones in primarily agricultural states such as Chiapas. The Indigenous peasants, who had already suffered considerably under the old system, were now at risk of losing their economic way of life entirely. As the date of NAFTA’s implementation in Mexico approached, Indigenous communities across the Chiapas Highlands prepared to resist.   The Zapatista Uprising of New Year’s Day 1994 Zapatista insurgents moving through the jungle, by Jorge Núñez, 2014. Source: The Conversation.   On January 1st, 1994, as NAFTA formally went into effect,  the EZLN made its debut, capturing several towns in Chiapas, Mexico during the early hours of the morning. Tourists on the way to visit Mayan ruins such as Chichen Itza awoke to masked and armed Maya men and women marching through the central streets of San Cristóbal de las Casas. By dawn, city hall had been taken over, land records destroyed, and prisoners freed. The rebels soon realized that the state was prepared to retaliate and left San Cristóbal shortly after.   The EZLN was initially successful in occupying several towns. However, by the end of the first week of the uprising, as Mexican state forces rallied and launched a counteroffensive, the rebels were driven out. Skirmishes continued in the Lacandon Jungle for a few more days until the two sides called a ceasefire on January 12, 1994. The conflict resulted in the deaths of approximately 145 people, mostly rebels. After the brief war, both the Zapatistas and the Mexican government largely opted to pursue peaceful means of resolving the conflict, though some government voices still called for a military solution.   The Aftermath of the Uprising Zapatista territory sign in Chiapas, by Matthew Rader, 2006. Source: Wikimedia Commons.   In the decades since the uprising, the Chiapas conflict has largely been stable, with no further extensive combat between the EZLN and the Mexican state, and the autonomous zones have been able to operate with relative freedom. Although its most radical goals outside of Chiapas failed to materialize following the uprising, the EZLN, particularly through its spokesperson Subcomandante Marcos, remained an active voice on the national political scene well into the 2000s. The March of the Color of the Earth and the Other Campaign, two Zapatista tours through Mexico in the 2000s, drew mass domestic and international support and confirmed the EZLN’s political significance on a national level. In Chiapas itself, the situation remained relatively secure until the latest escalation of paramilitary violence.   In recent years, there has been an increase in paramilitary violence against Zapatista communities. This is partly due to the Mexican drug war spreading into southern Mexico, previously considered a safer area compared to other parts of the country. Due to the unstable paramilitary situation in Chiapas, the autonomous zones are currently closed and visitors are rarely allowed to enter. As the 30th anniversary of the Zapatista uprising approaches, it is still unclear whether there will be any commemorative events open to the public or press, as there were for the 20th anniversary.   Zapatismo: What do the Zapatistas Believe? Zapatista militants standing against a mural of Emiliano Zapata, by Eduardo Verdugo, 2018. Source: The Guardian.   The Zapatistas are difficult to categorize in terms of ideology. They have been referred to as Marxists, anarchists, libertarian socialists, Indigenists, and more. Although some of these labels may be generally applicable, the Zapatistas’ ideology—often called Zapatismo or neo-Zapatismo—is best described as a blend of various influences and elements. It draws from both the Indigenous cultures of Mexico and various branches of radical leftism.   The EZLN is a movement primarily composed of Indigenous Mexicans from various communities in southern Mexico, particularly subgroups of the Maya such as the Tzotzil, Tzeltal, Ch’ol, Zoque, and Tojolabal. The main goals of the EZLN are to obtain recognition of Indigenous rights, dignity, and autonomy and to bring an end to over five centuries of colonial oppression of Indigenous peoples, as well as neoliberalism and globalization in Chiapas and beyond. The Fourth Declaration of the Lacandon Jungle, a communiqué released by the EZLN on the second anniversary of the Zapatista uprising, captures its vision: “In the world we want, everyone fits. In the world we want, many worlds fit.”   Zapatista musicians playing the Zapatista hymn under the movement’s flag, by Eduardo Verdugo, 2014. Source: CTV News.   The Zapatistas also look to the past to define their ideology, taking their name from Emiliano Zapata, a key figure in the Mexican Revolution. Zapata led the Ejército Libertador del Sur (Liberation Army of the South), fighting for land redistribution and agrarian reform. After he was assassinated by the Mexican state, Zapata became a symbol of the revolution, especially for poor, landless, and Indigenous peasants. His movement was encapsulated by the slogan “Land and Liberty” (Tierra y Libertad), which was coined by the Mexican anarchist Ricardo Flores Magón. By adopting Zapata’s name, the EZLN positions itself as the legitimate successor to Zapata’s ideology.   Political Objectives and Demands Zapatista women, by Tim Russo, 1998. Source: North American Congress on Latin America.   In March 1994, the Zapatistas issued a list of 34 demands on behalf of the Indigenous peoples of Chiapas, addressed to the Mexican national government and the state of Chiapas. While Chiapas’s Indigenous peoples took up arms against poverty and poor governance, their statement explained the reasons for their struggle and their primary demands. These demands cover a wide range of issues, including free and fair elections at all levels of government, recognition and protection of specific Indigenous rights, and the establishment of autonomous self-governance, among other issues.   Notably, this declaration includes a section specifically for the “Indigenous women’s petition.” This section closely resembles the EZLN Women’s Revolutionary Law, which was issued on the day of the Zapatista uprising. The Women’s Revolutionary Law establishes the rights of Zapatista and Indigenous women, including the right to political participation, education, freedom from gender-based violence, and bodily autonomy. The law states that the EZLN incorporates women into the revolutionary struggle regardless of their race, creed, color, or political views.   In the state of Chiapas and throughout Mexico, traditional gender and sexual norms have long held sway, making the Zapatistas a progressive force in terms of women’s rights. Women have become increasingly involved in the Zapatista movement, taking on roles such as officers and spokespeople. One notable example is Comandanta Ramona, the first Zapatista to appear in public in Mexico City, where she presided over the 1996 Congreso Nacional Indígena (National Indigenous Congress) gathering. Approximately one-third of EZLN combatants are women.   Comandanta Ramona. Source: Wikimedia Commons   After abandoning the armed struggle following the 1994 ceasefire, the EZLN has focused on pursuing legal means to establish Indigenous rights and autonomy. One of its key objectives during negotiations with the Mexican government has been the creation of a Law of Rights and Culture specifically for Indigenous Peoples. The EZLN first proposed this law in July 1998 in the Fifth Declaration of the Lacandon Jungle and reiterated its demand for it in the Sixth Declaration of the Lacandon Jungle in 2005, its most recent major manifesto. For now, the Zapatistas are dedicated to peacefully establishing legal recognition of Indigenous rights and cultures in Mexico.
Like
Comment
Share
Country Roundup
Country Roundup
2 yrs

Kevin Costner's Movie 'Horizon' Flops In Its Opening Weekend
Favicon 
tasteofcountry.com

Kevin Costner's Movie 'Horizon' Flops In Its Opening Weekend

The film brought in a fraction of its production budget. Continue reading…
Like
Comment
Share
Country Roundup
Country Roundup
2 yrs

Jelly Roll Promises to Help Put a Young Fan Through College
Favicon 
tasteofcountry.com

Jelly Roll Promises to Help Put a Young Fan Through College

Making dreams come true is all in a day's work for Jelly Roll. Continue reading…
Like
Comment
Share
Country Roundup
Country Roundup
2 yrs

Why a Major NASCAR Sponsor was Removed From Chase Elliott's Car
Favicon 
tasteofcountry.com

Why a Major NASCAR Sponsor was Removed From Chase Elliott's Car

The No. 9 car is going to look a whole lot different moving forward. Continue reading…
Like
Comment
Share
Country Roundup
Country Roundup
2 yrs

WATCH: Lainey Wilson Sings 'Dead Flowers' with The Rolling Stones
Favicon 
tasteofcountry.com

WATCH: Lainey Wilson Sings 'Dead Flowers' with The Rolling Stones

Lainey was a natural fit for the song. Continue reading…
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 yrs ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Justice Clarence Thomas Issues Warning to Jack Smith in Trump Immunity Ruling, with Charlie Kirk
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 yrs ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Supreme Court Rules on Trump's Presidential Immunity
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Satire
Conservative Satire
2 yrs ·Youtube Funny Stuff

YouTube
How Video Games Are Made In The Current Year
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
2 yrs

Donald Trump Was RIGHT About “Post Birth Abortion” — Here’s The Video Proof!
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Donald Trump Was RIGHT About “Post Birth Abortion” — Here’s The Video Proof!

I continue to see people claiming that President Trump “lied” or “exaggerated” in the Debate last week when he talked about Democrats wanting to do post-birth abortions. Not even wanting to do it….actually happening currently! Folks, President Trump was not wrong, there is video evidence of it, and I’ve got it for you right here. Trump was 100% right. And we have the receipts! Here is a direct quote from Gov. Northam explaining how he would allow a baby to be born, he would “keep it comfortable” and then a decision would be made on what to do with the baby: if a mother is in labor I can tell you exactly what would happen the infant would be delivered —  the infant would be kept comfortable the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother so so I think this was really blown out of proportion Ahhh yeah, even Democrats objected to that because, ummmm, that’s not even “abortion” that’s straight up murder of a living human being. Watch here: Backup here if needed: VIDEO EVIDENCE! Democrats not only support but PERFORM post-birth abortions! This is pure evil. Here is a direct quote from Gov. Northam explaining how he would allow a baby to be born, he would “keep it comfortable” and then a decision would be made on what to do with the… pic.twitter.com/xfhuEIWPvL — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 1, 2024 Translation: 5 minutes or even 1 minute before a happy, healthy, human being baby would be born, he supports killing it in the womb. Sick. Evil. Demonic. I think the Bible is clear that life begins at conception, but there is at least some understandable discussion people can debate about very early on in the process. But full term? One minute before birth? That’s just straight up murder. And remember this? HE’S FINISHED: RFK, Jr. goes on record saying he supports “full term” abortion. Let me decode that for you…. He just went full Governor Ralph Northam. You could literally have a baby born happy and healthy and RFK is ok with you killing it in the womb just 5 minutes before… pic.twitter.com/kysgnXzYL6 — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) May 9, 2024 Backup here: Here is RFK Jr. affirming his commitment to China-style full-term abortion, without limits, nationwide: RFK: “I believe we should leave it to the woman, we shouldn’t have the government involved.” STEELE: “Even if it’s full term?” RFK: “Even if it’s full term.” pic.twitter.com/i6GrXkPrlK — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) May 9, 2024
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
2 yrs

Tucker Carlson Confirms: Biden Is Out!
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Tucker Carlson Confirms: Biden Is Out!

The confirmations are coming in fast and furious…. We were one of the first to report that Joe Biden would be dropping out of the race soon. We had that report for you first back on Saturday evening: BREAKING: Joe Biden To Drop Out Tomorrow! Source: NBC News We then had this update: UPDATE: If Joe Biden Does Not Drop Out Today, Watch July 4th! Then Bill O'Reilly confirmed our reporting two days later: Bill O’Reilly Just Confirmed What We Told You Yesterday: Joe Biden Is Dropping Out And now today we have another confirmation, this one coming in from Tucker Carlson who cites an "unusually good source". Classic Tucker, I can almost hear him saying that with the big twinkle in his eye and trademark laugh following it. Take a look: From an unusually good source: Obama’s tweet supporting Joe Biden was disingenuous. In private, Obama is telling people Biden can’t win, and he is therefore in favor of an open convention. Obama will not say whom he supports, nor as of yesterday afternoon had he met personally with Biden to deliver the message. Relations between the Obamas and the Bidens have never been warm. At times they’ve been hostile. But recently they’ve deteriorated further, mostly due to Jill Biden. In the hours and days after the debate, she kept her husband cloistered away from anyone who might convince him to drop out. Jill Biden is the driving force behind her husband’s reelection campaign, just as she was in 2020, when other members of the family (including Biden’s sister Val) considered him too impaired to run. The next generation of potential Democratic candidates understands all this as an opportunity and they’re circling, particularly Gretchen Whitmer, who is promoting herself aggressively. From an unusually good source: Obama’s tweet supporting Joe Biden was disingenuous. In private, Obama is telling people Biden can’t win, and he is therefore in favor of an open convention. Obama will not say whom he supports, nor as of yesterday afternoon had he met personally… — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) July 1, 2024 Tucker was referencing this Tweet from Barack Obama, which claims to support Joe Biden, but which Tucker says is very "disingenuous": Bad debate nights happen. Trust me, I know. But this election is still a choice between someone who has fought for ordinary folks his entire life and someone who only cares about himself. Between someone who tells the truth; who knows right from wrong and will give it to the… — Barack Obama (@BarackObama) June 28, 2024 Barack Hussein Obama....disengenuous? Color me shocked! [massive sarcasm alert] Ok, but now let's advance the story.... What happens if Biden does drop out on Thursday? What happens next and where does all his money go? EXPLAINED: What Happens To Biden's Campaign Donations If He Drops Out? With Joe Biden almost surely set to drop out of the race soon (or be removed, or die) you may be wondering like I was: what will happen to all his campaign contributions? Millions upon millions.... Remember just a few weeks ago when Barack Obama helped Biden raise $28 million? WATCH: President Barack Obama Has To Guide A Confused Biden Off Stage As He FREEZES Again So what happens to all that money if Biden drops out, dies or is removed? Does it all go to Kamala? Is it just transferred to whoever replaces him? Not exactly. Allow me to explain how it would be dealt with.... If Joe Biden were to drop out of the presidential race, the handling of the campaign donations would follow the Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations. Here is how it would work in order of what would happen first to last (I've included citations to my sources and legal authorities): Debt Repayment: Campaign funds can be used to pay off any outstanding debts or obligations incurred during the campaign. This includes costs associated with winding down the campaign, such as office space rental, staff salaries, and office supplies​ (FactCheck.org)​​ (FEC.gov)​. Refunds: Contributions made for the general election must be refunded to the donors if the candidate drops out before the general election. This refund must occur within 60 days unless the donor gives permission to use the funds for other purposes​ (Investopedia)​. Donations to Charities or Political Parties: Leftover funds can be donated to charitable organizations or transferred to other political committees, including national, state, or local party committees​ (Investopedia)​​ (Mental Floss)​. Transfers to Other Candidates: The campaign can make contributions to other federal candidates, subject to limits (e.g., $2000 per election per candidate)​ (Mental Floss)​. Future Campaign Use: Funds can be saved for a future election campaign by the same candidate. If Biden decided to run for another office in the future, he could use the remaining funds for that campaign​ (Investopedia)​. Prohibited Personal Use: The funds cannot be used for personal expenses. Personal use includes expenses that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s campaign or duties as a federal officeholder, such as household items, personal mortgage or rent, and personal travel​ (Investopedia)​​ (Mental Floss)​. Ok, so let's dig into #4 a bit.... So let's just say that The Rock ends up replacing Joe Biden. It's true that only $2,000 of the Biden Campaign Funds can be transferred directly to The Rock's campaign, which of course is basically nothing. But that's not really the end of the story. There are many loopholes and workarounds. Here are the three biggest ones: Donations to Charities: Donate an unlimited amount to charitable organizations, provided the donation does not benefit Biden personally​ (Investopedia)​​ (FEC.gov)​. Transfers to Party Committees: Transfer unlimited amounts to national, state, or local political party committees​(Mental Floss)​​ (FEC.gov)​. Leadership PACs: Establish a leadership PAC, which can be used to support other candidates and political activities. This is more flexible but still subject to restrictions on personal use​ (Mental Floss)​. So that's probably where we'd see the bulk of it go....to places like the DNC or other PACs. Forbes recently published a similar analysis that lines up very nicely with what I've just posted above: KEY FACTS If a presidential candidate dropped out of the race, they would first need to repay all of their campaign vendors, and if the campaign ended before their parties’ respective conventions, where they officially select a nominee, they would have to refund all contributions designated to be used in the general election, elections lawyer Brett Kappel told Forbes. After that, Biden or Trump could try to use any leftover money to support their party’s new candidate—but campaign finance laws only allow them to transfer $2,000 directly to another federal campaign, so the vast majority of their eight-figure war chests would need to be given to other groups like political parties or PACs, a complicated process. The funds could seamlessly be transferred, without limits, to national, state or local party committees, such as the Democratic or Republican National Committees, which could use the money to support a replacement nominee or other Democratic candidates in federal down-ballot races—a scenario that would make the party largely responsible for funding a candidate’s presidential run, representing a break from most modern campaigns. FEC rules also permit limitless transfers to political action committees and to nonprofits, which can support candidates that align with their broader mission statement, though engaging in political campaigns cannot be their primary activity. Political action committees and super PACs supporting presidential candidates could seamlessly begin spending their money to support replacement candidates, but super PACs are legally prohibited from coordinating directly with campaigns. A presidential candidate who drops out of the race could also create what’s known as a leadership PAC, which are controlled by federal office holders and used to help other candidates for office, but leadership PACs have a $5,000 limit on donations to and from the organization, Kappel said, noting “it would be more efficient to just give [unspent campaign money] to the party committees.” CNN also had an interesting analysis more generally exploring what happens in several key things if Biden is replaced: Who could replace Biden? You can assume, for instance, that Vice President Kamala Harris would be a top contender to be on the ballot in such a scenario. But there would be other potential candidates who previously argued they could run a more effective campaign against former President Donald Trump. Would someone like California Gov. Gavin Newsom – who offered unqualified support for Biden in the wake of Thursday’s debate – challenge Harris at the convention? Settling on a replacement could be divisive and ugly. It would be up to the delegates to decide, in a series of votes after frantic lobbying, who to pick. On the Democratic side, there is also another group to consider: the “superdelegates,” a group of about 700 senior party leaders and elected officials who are automatically delegates to the convention based on their position. Under normal party rules, they can’t vote on the first ballot if they could swing the nomination, but they’re free to vote on subsequent ballots. What if a candidate left the race after the convention? It would take a drastic event for a candidate to leave the race in the few months between a party’s nominating convention in the summer and the general election in November. Democrats and Republicans have slightly different methods of dealing with this possibility. You can imagine the end result would probably be that the running mate stepped up to be on the general election ballot, but that is not necessarily guaranteed. Democrats – The Democratic National Committee is empowered to fill a vacancy on the national ticket after the convention under party rules, after the party chair consults with Democratic governors and congressional leadership. Republicans – If a vacancy occurs on the Republican side, the Republican National Committee can either reconvene the national convention or select a new candidate itself. Would the running mate automatically become the nominee? An in-depth Congressional Research Service memo also notes that if an incumbent president becomes incapacitated after winning the party’s nomination, the 25th Amendment would elevate the vice president to the presidency, but party rules would determine who rises to become the party’s nominee. Neither party, according to the CRS, requires that the presidential candidate’s running mate be elevated to the top of the ticket, though that would obviously be the most likely scenario. Has a candidate ever left the race after the convention? In modern times, per the CRS, the Democrat running for vice president in 1972, Sen. Thomas Eagleton, was forced to step aside after the convention after it was discovered that he was treated for mental illness. (1972 was a very different time! Today, thankfully, there is not nearly the stigma attached to mental health.) The DNC actually needed to convene a meeting to affirm Sargent Shriver as Democratic nominee George McGovern’s second-choice running mate. What if a president-elect was incapacitated after the election? If a president-elect was to die, timing is again important. Under the Constitution, it is electors meeting in state capitols who technically cast votes for the presidency. While some states require that they vote for the winner of the election in their state, in others they have leeway. The CRS memo, which cites several congressional hearings on the subject, suggests it would clearly make sense for a vice president-elect to simply assume the role of president-elect, but the law itself is murky. Under the 20th Amendment, if a president-elect dies, his or her running mate, the vice president-elect, becomes president. There could be some question, for instance, about when exactly a person becomes president-elect. Is it after the electors meet in December, or after Congress meets to count Electoral College votes on January 6?
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 22141 out of 56670
  • 22137
  • 22138
  • 22139
  • 22140
  • 22141
  • 22142
  • 22143
  • 22144
  • 22145
  • 22146
  • 22147
  • 22148
  • 22149
  • 22150
  • 22151
  • 22152
  • 22153
  • 22154
  • 22155
  • 22156

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund