YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
2 yrs

Joe Biden’s “Show Trials” — Echoes Of Joseph Stalin
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Joe Biden’s “Show Trials” — Echoes Of Joseph Stalin

Joe Biden. Joe Stalin. Two dictators cut from the same cloth. Study history, my friends….or be doomed to repeat it. And today I’m going to educate you on the history of Joseph Stalin’s “Show Trials” because you are “repeating history” right now and you might not even know it! Perhaps you’ve never heard of those before, or perhaps you don’t know much about them. But I’m going to educate you and as I do I want you to simply ask yourself one thing: How similar does this sound to Joe Biden and what he and his DOJ is doing to President Trump? In fact, is it so similar that you could simply replace a few names in what I’m about to show you and have it read as news from 2024? Replace Joseph Stalin with Joe Biden. Replace some of the persecuted Defendants with President Trump. I think you’re going to be blown away, let’s jump right in…. Joseph Stalin’s Show Trials: A History of Tyranny and Terror Joseph Stalin’s “show trials” were a cornerstone of his brutal regime, exemplifying the extreme lengths to which he went to maintain and consolidate his power. These trials were not about justice but were designed to eliminate real and perceived enemies through a grotesque display of state power, manipulation, and terror. The show trials were a part of the broader Great Purge, which resulted in the deaths and suffering of millions. Background and Context Stalin rose to power after the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924. Initially, he maneuvered politically within the Communist Party to outflank his rivals. By the mid-1930s, Stalin’s paranoia and desire for absolute control led to a campaign of terror aimed at purging the Communist Party, the military, and society of anyone he deemed a threat. The show trials were the most public and theatrical aspect of this campaign. The Mechanism of the Show Trials Identification of Targets: Stalin targeted high-ranking members of the Communist Party, military leaders, intellectuals, and other influential figures. Often, these were individuals who had previously been his allies but had fallen out of favor or were seen as potential threats. Fabrication of Charges: The charges were usually fabricated or grossly exaggerated. Accusations included espionage, sabotage, conspiracy to overthrow the government, and treasonous collaboration with foreign powers. These charges were meant to paint the accused as enemies of the state and justify their elimination. Forced Confessions: The NKVD, Stalin’s ruthless secret police, used severe torture, psychological pressure, and threats against the families of the accused to extract confessions. These confessions were often scripted and detailed fantastic plots and crimes that never occurred. Public Trials: The trials were meticulously staged to serve as propaganda tools. They were held in public with extensive coverage by the state-controlled media, ensuring that the narrative was tightly controlled. The outcomes were predetermined, with the accused invariably found guilty. Executions and Imprisonment: The trials typically concluded with swift executions or long sentences in the Gulag, the Soviet Union’s notorious system of forced labor camps. The primary aim was not just to punish but to instill fear across the nation. Notable Show Trials The Trial of the Sixteen (1936): This was the first major show trial, targeting members of the so-called “Trotskyite-Zinovievite Terrorist Center.” Grigory Zinoviev and Lev Kamenev, among others, were accused of conspiring to assassinate Stalin and other Soviet leaders. All were found guilty and executed. The Trial of the Seventeen (1937): This trial involved former high-ranking party officials and industrial managers, accused of espionage and sabotage. The most prominent figures were Karl Radek and Georgy Pyatakov. Again, forced confessions led to guilty verdicts and executions or imprisonment. The Trial of the Twenty-One (1938): The final and most dramatic of the major show trials, it involved prominent figures such as Nikolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov, and Genrikh Yagoda. Bukharin’s confession, obtained under duress, was particularly notable given his previous stature within the party. The accused were found guilty of a wide range of fabricated crimes and were either executed or sent to labor camps. The True Nature and Consequences The true nature of Stalin’s show trials was an orchestrated campaign of terror and control. Far from serving justice, these trials were a means for Stalin to: Eliminate Political Rivals: By targeting influential party members, Stalin removed any potential challengers to his authority. This eradication of rivals extended to the military and intellectual elite, ensuring no dissenting voices could threaten his rule. Instill Fear: The public nature of the trials and the brutality of the punishments created an atmosphere of fear. Citizens and party members alike were terrified of being accused and purged, which stifled any potential opposition or criticism. Propaganda Tool: The trials were used to propagate the image of Stalin as the vigilant protector of the Soviet state against internal and external enemies. This propaganda reinforced his cult of personality and justified his repressive measures. Enforce Ideological Conformity: By eliminating those who were seen as ideologically impure or dissenting, Stalin ensured that the Communist Party and Soviet society adhered strictly to his interpretation of Marxism-Leninism. The Human Toll The consequences of the show trials were devastating: Mass Executions: Hundreds of thousands were executed, often on flimsy or fabricated charges. The loss of life was immense, and many who were executed were loyal communists or innocents caught in the crossfire of Stalin’s paranoia. Gulag Imprisonments: Millions were sent to the Gulag, where they endured inhumane conditions, forced labor, and high mortality rates. These camps were a tool of both punishment and economic exploitation. Decimation of Leadership: The purges decimated the leadership of the Communist Party, the military, and various sectors of society. This loss of experienced and capable individuals weakened the Soviet state and led to inefficiencies and setbacks in various fields. Climate of Paranoia and Repression: The pervasive fear and suspicion created by the purges and show trials had a lasting impact on Soviet society. Trust was eroded, and a culture of informants and surveillance became entrenched. Joseph Stalin’s show trials stand as one of the darkest chapters in 20th-century history, exemplifying the brutality and ruthlessness of his dictatorship. Through a combination of fabricated charges, forced confessions, public humiliation, and mass executions, Stalin was able to consolidate his power at the cost of countless lives and widespread suffering. His actions during the Great Purge reveal a leader who was willing to employ any means necessary to maintain his grip on power, painting him as one of history’s most malevolent dictators. Was I right or what? Eerily similar, isn’t it? For the visual learners, watch this: One more here:
Like
Comment
Share
INFOWARS
INFOWARS
2 yrs

#warroomshow: Trump Announces Record Fundraising Since Guilty Verdict As Millions Of Democrats Are Pledging Their Vote To Trump

- WATCH LIVE: https://www.infowars.com/show/war-room/ https://www.infowars.com/posts..../friday-live-feds-ja

SUPPORT: https://drjonesnaturals.com https://infowarsstore.com

Attention Required! | Cloudflare
Favicon 
www.infowars.com

Attention Required! | Cloudflare

Site has no Description
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
2 yrs ·Youtube Music

YouTube
Lies the Internet Told About Nu-Metal
Like
Comment
Share
Independent Sentinel News Feed
Independent Sentinel News Feed
2 yrs

Nashville Killer’s Manifesto Reveals She Hated Christians, Had Bizarre Trans Fantasies
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

Nashville Killer’s Manifesto Reveals She Hated Christians, Had Bizarre Trans Fantasies

The Nashville killer, who called himself/herself a transgender named Aiden, wrote a manifesto that she left in her car when she murdered six people, including three 9-year-old children, at a Christian elementary school. It was concealed by the police under pressure from the Left. The manifesto has been released. The Tennessee Star and others filed […] The post Nashville Killer’s Manifesto Reveals She Hated Christians, Had Bizarre Trans Fantasies appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
2 yrs

The Key To Creating A Happy Life — And The Science That Proves It
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

The Key To Creating A Happy Life — And The Science That Proves It

What is the secret to a happy life? Is there a secret? Is there only one secret? These are the questions that, at the most foundational level, everyone asks throughout life. They are a part of the human condition. I consider myself a relatively happy person, and I love and am grateful for my life. I believe gratefulness influences happiness, so I make practicing gratitude a habit. Conversely, people who live in a constant victimhood mentality (one that seems to be overtaking our culture) are, without a doubt, not happy. While we don’t need science to prove to us these people are unhappy, science just did.  In a poorly typed tweet, the New York Post shared the results of a study which suggests “woke” people are more likely to be unhappy. Of course, we didn’t need those results to be “suggested” because we know they’re true. ‘Woke’ people more likely to be unahppy, anxious and depressed, new study suggests https://t.co/25RQn08ouR pic.twitter.com/QDHcGadc8D — New York Post (@nypost) March 17, 2024 The study was conducted in Finland where researchers examined the progressive ideology that has now infiltrated their culture. First, they created a social justice scale with a list of truisms, or principles of progressivism, to ask participants of the study whether they agreed or disagreed with those statements. Then, they compared the results with other behaviors based on the responses to those statements. The study’s final Critical Social Justice Attitude scale included seven truisms of woke people:  In the end, their final Critical Social Justice Attitude Scale identified seven truisms of woke people: “If white people have on average a higher level of income than black people, it is because of racism.” “University reading lists should include fewer white or European authors.” “Microaggressions should be challenged often and actively.” “Trans* women who compete with women in sports are not helping women’s rights.” (reverse scored) “We don’t need to talk more about the color of people’s skin.” “A white person cannot understand how a black person feels equally well as another black person.” “A member of a privileged group can adopt features or cultural elements of a less privileged group.” (reverse scored) For the people who agreed with these principles, identifying them as the things they are concerned with on a daily basis, it is no wonder they’re unhappy. The conclusion researchers drew is the same conclusion we all could have told them without even doing this study: However, the most concerning finding was the relationship between mental health and agreement with the scale. Specifically, researchers found a high prevalence of anxiety and depression in people who believe the statement “If white people have on average a higher income than black people, it is because of racism.” More broadly, they found that those who identified as left-wing were most likely to report lower mental well-being. That’s correct: “They found that those who identified as left-wing were most likely to report lower mental well-being.” Color me shocked. Although researchers noted that we should not assume this is the case in every society and country, we know that it basically is. Finland can take these results and expand them to other countries because this is truth — and it’s certainly not isolated to Finland. Columbia epidemiologists have acknowledged depression rates are higher among liberals; American Affairs, a journal of public policy and political thought, has evaluated the “well-being gap” between liberals and conservatives; and the New York Times has analyzed sadness among progressives and its self-destructive effects. This is not new information. WATCH: The Comments Section with Brett Cooper Evidence for why the Left’s mental well-being is lower is evident on television, in the news, or on social media: The Left constantly eats their own. They are friendly with you — until they aren’t. You can be the champion of all their current stances and you can wave all the flags, but if you ask one wrong question or so much as step a little bit out of line, they will rip you to shreds. They will cancel you, insult you, and kick you right out of their group, which is the definition of a toxic relationship and an unhealthy environment. The Left also promulgates a victim-centric attitude, an attitude that leads to mental illness. Psychologists have studied that fact for years, yet that exact attitude has utterly taken hold of our society. The replies to the Post’s tweet brought up these points over and over. Screenshot. X. Screenshot. X. Meanwhile, the people who quote tweeted told a completely different story than those who replied. They seemed to want out of the comment section to tell their own story without anyone around to disagree with them. For example, one person said that the list of progressive truisms “are also correlated with higher intelligence,” meaning that people who agree with them have a better “understanding of how society and the world works.” Screenshot. X. In actuality, science is split on that. On the one hand, numerous reports have been published explaining that intelligent people are miserable and unhappy because of the unbearable weight of the world; on the other, countless reports explain that intelligent people are actually incredibly happy for a myriad of reasons, usually due to their worldview, attitudes, and what they believe in terms of happiness and fulfillment. How an individual chooses to live their life has a great impact on those outcomes. Another quote tweet said that those who are “aware of the problems” are the ones who will be upset about them. Screenshot. X. To be clear, conservatives are not unaware of the problems that exist in our society. We aren’t walking around in ignorant bliss and therefore not upset. Listen to any Republican or conservative give a speech and you’ll hear a Right-winger ragging on about some problem or other. (When this happens, the Left critiques us, saying we are just trying to pull society backwards by disliking everything in the modern world — which is obviously not the case.) No, it is not that conservatives have not identified problems; rather, conservatives see different problems. We do not find problems for the sake of having a pity party and an opportunity to complain — something which, by and large, is what many people on the Left resort to. Rolling around in self-pity and complaining just to complain create feelings of powerlessness and anger, leaving them spinning in a cycle of victimhood. People on the Right, however, are realists. I would argue that we are solution-oriented, an attribute critical to happiness. Conservatives and psychologists alike agree on this. We have hope, we’re positive, and we genuinely want conditions to improve. I genuinely care about everybody in this country, and I want them to thrive and be successful, not be dragged down by their own attitude about the world. I hope that for everyone because it benefits our society as a whole. In an article published in the National Post titled, “Of Course Conservatives Are Happier — They Believe Society Is Worth It,” well-known Canadian psychologist and professor Gad Saad explains this phenomenon, saying: By definition, conservatives believe that there are values, beliefs, attitudes and ideas worth conserving. Hence, they wake up every morning with a sense of existential glee; they recognize that their society, whilst far from perfect, contains many tried and tested ideas worth preserving. Liberals and progressives on the other hand wake up with a dark cloud of existential doom because their society is apparently racist, sexist, transphobic, Islamophobic and ableist. Canada supposedly sits on stolen land. Capitalism is an exploitative system that rapes Mother Earth. We have less than 15 minutes to go because of the existential crisis associated with climate change. Hence, from the perspective of the Noble Progressive, we must dismantle the current system and fight for Unicornia, which lies just around the corner. How could one be happy when there is so much ugliness in the world? Saad’s contrast of conservatives and progressives is succinct, yet impactful. Conservatives have a hopeful and positive reason to wake up in the morning — and that changes everything. We have goals. We believe in the best of society and the best of what it can be. We have values outside our political ideology, which the Left often does not, and it is those values, like faith and family, that propel us forward and fulfill us. Saad’s acknowledgment that we “believe that there are values, beliefs, attitudes and ideas worth conserving” is accurate, in that we have solid, tried and true values that have stood the test of time. They are far more stable than the values of the Left, which change daily based on their emotions or the current trend. The fact that we have a strong foundation to stand on — that we know what we’re fighting for, that we know what works — speaks volumes. Perhaps most importantly, we understand and accept personal responsibility, which is something many on the Left lack. We know we are responsible for our own happiness, for our outlook, and for our response to the world around us. We are responsible for our values and the circle of people we surround ourselves with. This is all intertwined with happiness. And while conquering and owning personal responsibility is difficult, it is also incredibly empowering. Ultimately, that is why we are happier.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
2 yrs

Trump Raises $12 Million At Fundraiser In Nancy Pelosi’s Hometown
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

Trump Raises $12 Million At Fundraiser In Nancy Pelosi’s Hometown

Former President Donald Trump reportedly raised about $12 million during a fundraiser with tech entrepreneurs in San Francisco on Thursday.  The fundraiser was at the Pacific Heights home of Venture capitalist David Sacks who hosted the fundraiser alongside venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya, Reuters reported. Sacks and Palihapitiya are co-hosts of the popular “All-In” podcast. The cost of attending ranged between $50,000 to $500,000 depending on benefits. A number of well-known venture capitalists and crypto investors showed up for the event.  Trump was introduced at the event by Sacks, who announced his endorsement of Trump in a Thursday post on X, and Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH). Trump has repeatedly criticized Democrats for their proposed increase in regulations on cryptocurrency.  The event took place in deep blue San Francisco, which is represented by former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a political foe of Trump. According to conservative lawyer and Republican National Committee member Harmeet Dhillon, Trump was “relaxed, happy, and cracking jokes about AI,” at the event.  “$12M raised tonight! Incredible support for [Trump]. Not an empty seat in the gorgeous home of  [David Sacks] and Jacqueline. Thrilled to see the tech leaders stepping up!” Dhillon posted on X.  Sources told Fox News that Sacks said at the event that “this all started with JD Vance calling and asking if we could host an event for President Trump. Without JD’s advice and encouragement, this would never have happened.” In his endorsement message of Trump posted to X, Sacks said that he was backing Trump over Biden because of several key issues, including economic policy, foreign policy, immigration, and legal fairness.  “My reasons rest on four main issues that I think are vital to American prosperity, security, and stability – issues where the Biden administration has veered badly off course and where I believe President Trump can lead us back,” Sacks said.  CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “President Biden keeps insisting that a return of President Trump to the White House threatens democracy,” Sacks said. “But his administration is the one that has colluded with tech platforms to censor the Internet, used the intelligence community to cover up his son Hunter’s laptop, and pursued elective prosecutions against his political opponents.” The high dollar fundraiser comes as Trump’s campaign has pulled in hundreds of millions of dollars after he was convicted of falsifying business records in New York. He has reportedly raised more than $200 million after the trial concluded last week. President Joe Biden has long held an advantage in fundraising, but Trump has been closing the gap in recent weeks with strong numbers. 
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
2 yrs

‘Boy Meets World’ Actress Pregnant At 54, Credits Natural Remedies
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

‘Boy Meets World’ Actress Pregnant At 54, Credits Natural Remedies

“Boy Meets World” actress Trina McGee is speaking more about being pregnant again at 54 after her announcement caused a stir online earlier this week. The star already has three children: Ramia, 31, Langston, 29, and Ezra, 25. She shares the first two with ex-husband Courtland Davis and the third with a previous relationship. McGee is expecting this baby with her current husband, Marcello Thedford.  The actress, who played Angela Moore on the popular ’90s TV sitcom, said she’s been trying to have a baby with Thedford by trying natural remedies.  “I have been saying I wanted to have a baby with my current husband of 16 years for quite a while,” McGee told Entertainment Tonight. She went on to tell the outlet she visited “shamans” in Belize who recommended elixirs and natural remedies for reversing signs of early menopause.  “The number one thing for me is to not partake in any stress and stay away from negativity as much as I can, and that pertains to what I put on TV… what I look at on my phone, you know, there’s so much drama and violence and negativity out there as soon as you turn on the screen,” McGee said.  “I really want to be pointed when I turn on the screen; what I’m watching. Because stress, for me, is the biggest factor.” Some doctors, however, expressed their skepticism of McGee citing “natural remedies” for helping her get pregnant. “If she is pregnant (naturally) at 54, it is the biggest miracle of my career,” said Dr. Allison Rodgers, an infertility specialist at Fertility Centers of Illinois, according to USA Today. Dr. Mickey Coffler, a reproductive endocrinologist, added, “I’m not this person’s doctor. I cannot say one way or another how this person got pregnant. But, if there is an elixir getting 54-year-olds pregnant, I’m sure the whole world would be on it.” McGee said she had considered doing IVF to conceive but ultimately decided against it. “Just sheer joy, sheer joy, and I don’t partake in any of the negativity anybody has to say about it. I am so happy. I have been blessed, and that’s it,” the actress added. “And all I’m concerned about — I only have one job now – is to have this baby, and that’s what I’m about.” McGee shared her pregnancy news on Instagram Tuesday, writing, “At the tender age of 54 I have found myself pregnant. Please bless us with your prayers for a safe delivery.” The actress later told ABC she was surprised by the response. “Honestly, I didn’t think it was such a big deal … and suddenly I realized it’s very inspirational for a lot of women who are over 40, who are looking to conceive,” McGee said. “When I was typing [my Instagram post], that’s what I was feeling, like there’s somebody out there that is dealing with this that might need a little help and inspiration.”
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
2 yrs

If Biden’s D-Day Speech Sounded Familiar, There’s A (Reagan) Reason
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

If Biden’s D-Day Speech Sounded Familiar, There’s A (Reagan) Reason

In 1984, then-President Ronald Reagan gave a moving speech commemorating the 40th anniversary of the D-Day invasion on the beaches of Normandy, France — and 40 years later, for the 80th anniversary, President Joe Biden appears to have given at least parts of the same speech. Radio host and Outkick founder Clay Travis noticed the similarities and share video of the two speeches side by side. “Joe Biden essentially plagiarized Ronald Reagan’s famous 1984 speech at Pointe du Hoc today in Normandy. Watch these clips side by side. Wow,” he commented. WATCH: Joe Biden essentially plagiarized Ronald Reagan’s famous 1984 speech at Pointe du Hoc today in Normandy. Watch these clips side by side. Wow: pic.twitter.com/jeGgTS2Nnm — Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) June 7, 2024 What followed was a series of clips showing Biden’s remarks and then Reagan’s. Biden: “At last the hour had come. Dawn. The 6th of June, 1944.” Reagan: “At dawn, the morning of the 6th of June 1944.” Biden: “225 American Rangers arrived by ship, jumped into the waves, and stormed the beach.” Reagan: “225 Rangers jumped off the British landing craft and ran to the bottom of these cliffs.” Biden: “Gunfire rained above them, but still they kept coming. Nazi grades thrown from above exploded against the cliffs, but still they kept coming.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Reagan: “The Rangers looked up and saw the enemy soldiers at the edge of the cliffs, shooting down at them with machine guns and throwing grenades. And the American Rangers began to climb.” Biden: “They launched their ladders, ropes, and grappling hooks, and they began to climb.” Reagan: “They shot rope ladders over the face of these cliffs and they began to pull themselves up.” Biden: “When the Nazis cut their ladders, the Rangers used their ropes. When the Nazis cut the ropes, the Rangers used their hands.” Reagan: “When one Ranger fell, another would take his place. When one rope was cut, a Ranger would grab another and begin his climb again.” Biden: “And inch by inch, foot by foot, yard by yard, the Rangers clawed — literally clawed — their way up this mighty precipice until at last they reached the top.” Reagan: “Soon, one by one, the Rangers pulled themselves over the top.” Biden: “They breached this Atlantic wall, and they turned with that one effort, the tide of the war that began to save the world.” Reagan: “And in seizing the firm land at the top of these cliffs, they began to seize back the continent of Europe.” Several critics pointed out that when it came to plagiarism, a cribbed D-Day speech would not be Biden’s first rodeo. “Joe Biden: Once a plagiarist, always a plagiarist,” Steve Guest posted, noting that a previous plagiarism scandal had ultimately forced Biden out of contention in the 1988 Democratic presidential primary. Joe Biden: Once a plagiarist, always a plagiarist. https://t.co/dT1ekc1oU5 pic.twitter.com/vuWEw9aRB7 — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) June 7, 2024 “Why would he do this? Why invite a direct comparison with Reagan with whom no president could ever compete in telling this story, much less one as inarticulate as Biden?” Marc Thiessen added. Why would he do this? Why invite a direct comparison with Reagan with whom no president could ever compete in telling this story m, much less one as inarticulate as Biden? https://t.co/YwsFWabgtb — Marc Thiessen ??❤️?????? (@marcthiessen) June 7, 2024 “If only there was a history of plagiarism with Biden, then it might represent a pattern. Oh wait…” another posted. If only there was a history of plagiarism with Biden, then it might represent a pattern. Oh wait… https://t.co/J0FiOyhkCd — IT Guy (@ITGuy1959) June 7, 2024 “‘Hey AI. Write me a speech about Normandy,'” the U.S. Oil and Gas Association posted. “Tell us your comms team doesn’t understand that things happened prior to 2018 when they graduated from college without telling us that they don’t understand that things happened prior to 2018 when they graduated from college …” “Hey AI. Write me a speech about Normandy.” Tell us your comms team doesn’t understand that things happened prior to 2018 when they graduated from college without telling us that they don’t understand that things happened prior to 2018 when they graduated from college…. https://t.co/yvG7EInZRE — US Oil & Gas Association (@US_OGA) June 7, 2024 But while the speech patterns were very similar — a fact that Biden’s defenders claimed was simply because both presidents were describing the same events — former Governor Scott Walker (R-WI) noted a marked difference between the demeanor of the two men. Reagan, 73 at the time he gave the 40th anniversary speech, appeared to be in good health as he stood tall and saluted the veterans present that day. Biden, in contrast, raised eyebrows when he appeared unsure whether he was supposed to sit or stand — and was then escorted from the ceremonies while French President Emmanuel Macron remained behind, speaking with the veterans and guests. “What a difference between President Ronald Reagan on the 40th anniversary of D-Day and President Joe Biden on the 80th anniversary of D-day,” Walker said, sharing side-by-side photos of the two presidents. What a difference between President Ronald Reagan on the 40th anniversary of D-Day and President Joe Biden on the 80th anniversary of D-day. pic.twitter.com/i4EWPLwjl4 — Scott Walker (@ScottWalker) June 7, 2024
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
2 yrs

Epic Video Shows Russian APC Taking Fire From Ukrainian Bradley Vehicle
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Epic Video Shows Russian APC Taking Fire From Ukrainian Bradley Vehicle

'The Russian occupiers are not reducing the pace of their assaults'
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
2 yrs

Trans School Shooter’s Uncovered Writings Detail ‘Imaginary Penis’ Fantasies, Hours-Long Simulated Bestiality Sessions: REPORT
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Trans School Shooter’s Uncovered Writings Detail ‘Imaginary Penis’ Fantasies, Hours-Long Simulated Bestiality Sessions: REPORT

'I swear to god I’m a male'
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 25154 out of 56670
  • 25150
  • 25151
  • 25152
  • 25153
  • 25154
  • 25155
  • 25156
  • 25157
  • 25158
  • 25159
  • 25160
  • 25161
  • 25162
  • 25163
  • 25164
  • 25165
  • 25166
  • 25167
  • 25168
  • 25169

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund