YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Gamers Realm
Gamers Realm
2 yrs

How to get Red Death Reformed Exotic Pulse Rifle in Destiny 2
Favicon 
www.pcinvasion.com

How to get Red Death Reformed Exotic Pulse Rifle in Destiny 2

While it has “Death” in its name, Red Death Reformed is a rifle in Destiny 2 that imbues life. Here is how to get the Red Death Reformed Exotic Pulse Rifle in Destiny 2. Destiny 2: How to get the Red Death Reformed Exotic Pulse Rifle The Red Death Reformed Exotic Pulse Rifle is The Final Shape’s Act 1 Exotic available for all Guardians to collect. To get it, all you need to do is to access the Season Pass tab and then claim it. However, there is a bit more complexity to claiming it, and you probably know why. You see, there are two different tiers of Season Pass ranks and rewards, and if you have purchased the Season Pass for The Final Shape, you will be able to collect the Red Death Reformed as soon as you boot up the game — if the servers allow you to — since it is a Rank 1 reward. Screenshot: PC Invasion However, if you don’t own a Season Pass, then you will have to work a bit more to get the weapon. IRed Death Reformed is still obtainable ...
Like
Comment
Share
Gamers Realm
Gamers Realm
2 yrs

Is The Final Shape the last Destiny 2 expansion? Answered
Favicon 
www.pcinvasion.com

Is The Final Shape the last Destiny 2 expansion? Answered

The Final Shape expansion brings an end to the decade-long Light and Darkness saga of Destiny 2, and since everything has been building up to this from the beginning, many players are wondering what the future of the game looks like. Is The Final Shape the final Destiny 2 expansion? Destiny as a franchise isn’t going anywhere, so there’s no need to worry about that. The future of Destiny 2, however, will look different going forward after the release of The Final Shape. New update schedules are replacing the traditional seasonal model, and you may not be purchasing big expansions as often as you’re used to. Are More Destiny Expansions Coming After Final Shape? The Final Shape is not the end of Destiny 2. Bungie has not officially announced any expansions for the years following The Final Shape, but the game and universe will continue to grow in exciting ways. The most significant difference to Destiny 2’s content delivery model post-Final Shape is th...
Like
Comment
Share
Gamers Realm
Gamers Realm
2 yrs

How to get the Red Death Reformed Catalyst in Destiny 2
Favicon 
www.pcinvasion.com

How to get the Red Death Reformed Catalyst in Destiny 2

Destiny 2 is changing everything we know about seasonal content. After The Final Shape, Guardians will be receiving new episodes, starting with Episode 1: Echoes. But with so many changes happening with new weapons, let’s find out how to get the Red Dead Reformed catalyst in Destiny 2. Where to get the Red Dead Reformed Catalyst in Destiny 2 Screenshot: PC Invasion When you hop into the game to face off against the Witness, you’ll notice a lot has changed about Destiny 2. New legendary weapons, a new Power cap, and more await you. However, if you purchased the Season Pass, you’ll earn yourself a brand-new Exotic: the Red Death Reformed. Like almost every Exotic weapon, Red Death comes with an obtainable catalyst. And to get the Red Death Reformed catalyst in Destiny 2, you must reach rank 145 on the season pass. This will take you quite some time to progress through the first 144 ranks, but you won’t be able to just buy your way to it as soon as poss...
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
2 yrs

Biden Executive Order on Southern Border Called ‘Too Little, Too Late’ by Republicans
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Biden Executive Order on Southern Border Called ‘Too Little, Too Late’ by Republicans

President Joe Biden signed an executive order Tuesday giving himself the authority to close the border when the seven-day average of daily border crossings between ports of entry exceeds 2,500.  The order is set to take effect immediately, since the daily threshold has already been met. The border will only reopen if crossings between ports fall to a seven-day daily average of 1,500 or less.  Biden is drawing on the authority in Title 8 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to temporarily close the border.  The executive action specifically makes three changes to Biden’s own border policy:  Illegal aliens who cross the border between a port of entry will “generally be ineligible for asylum.” Illegal aliens who are being processed for “expedited removal while the limitation is in effect will only be referred for a credible-fear screening” if they express that they are afraid to return to their country of origin.  The qualification for a “credible-fear” interview is being raised to “reasonable probability of persecution or torture standard.” Even before Biden issued the order Tuesday, Republican lawmakers criticized the then-anticipated action, saying the order was too little, too late to solve a crisis they say Biden himself caused.  “On Day One, this president signed dozens of executive orders that caused this border crisis,” Rep. Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz., said during a press conference on Capitol Hill on Tuesday morning.  Ciscomani said that since Biden took office in January 2021, he has refused to “take any kind of responsibility or ownership over this crisis. Also since then, [Biden] refused that he had any authority to actually solve or address this crisis that we’re seeing now.” President Biden's executive action on the border today is likely going to be "too little, too late," according to @RepCiscomani. pic.twitter.com/BobTffNV4s— Virginia Allen (@Virginia_Allen5) June 4, 2024 On Biden’s first day in office, he signed an executive order stopping border wall construction, and rolled back a number of Trump administration border and immigration policies that the Biden administration called “harsh and extreme.” Biden suspended President Donald Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy when he took office, and formally ended the program in the spring of 2021.  Biden has repeatedly said “Congress must act” to secure the border, but Republicans and Democrats have failed to agree on a border bill. In May 2023, the GOP-led House passed HR 2, a border-security bill that would restart border wall construction, end catch-and-release, and reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy. The Senate has yet to take up the bill.  A Senate border bill, which was touted as “bipartisan” and backed by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., failed in February and again in May as Republicans said the bill would do more harm than good at the southern border by still allowing 4,000 illegal aliens to enter the country daily.  Republicans have criticized the failed Senate bill and Biden’s new executive action as an election year stunt. After economic issues, immigration is a top concern for American voters ahead of the November presidential election, according to Gallup.  “Like the Schumer Senate border bill, the exceptions swallow the rule,” Lora Ries, director of The Heritage Foundation’s Border Security and Immigration Center, told The Daily Signal. “Biden simply wants credit for ‘doing something’ five months out from Election Day and to bash congressional Republicans, even though the House did its job,” said Ries, noting the passage of HR 2, “a real border security bill,” last year. “Joe Biden has had 3 years to secure the border,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Monday. “Why is he just now signing an executive order to fix it? It’s a political play before the election to get the corporate media to gush and say, ‘Things aren’t so bad.’” During a press conference Tuesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., called Biden’s executive order on the border “window dressing,” adding that if Biden “was concerned about the border, he would have done this a long time ago.” 126 days ago, Joe Biden stated, "I've done all I can do" to fix the border catastrophe.Today, he’ll announce an executive action using the same authority he denied having. If he was actually concerned about our wide-open border, he would have acted a long time ago. pic.twitter.com/L92r9SO8Ui— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) June 4, 2024 On the other side of the political aisle, opponents of stronger border enforcement also criticized the president for his executive action, arguing it would harm illegal aliens seeking asylum.  “A few days into Immigrant Heritage Month … and [Biden] is planning to shut down legal pathway for people fleeing persecution,” the Welcome With Dignity Campaign wrote on X on Monday.  Laura St. John, legal director of the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project, said in a statement that her pro-immigration organization is “deeply dismayed to see the Biden administration enacting further restrictions on asylum.”  The Border Patrol’s apprehension of illegal aliens has remained high this spring. In April, the Border Patrol apprehended an average of 4,296 illegal aliens between ports of entry daily. Since Biden took office, Customs and Border Protection has encountered 9.5 million illegal aliens at or between U.S. ports of entry. An additional nearly 1.8 million known “gotaways” have crossed America’s borders since Biden took office.  The post Biden Executive Order on Southern Border Called ‘Too Little, Too Late’ by Republicans appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
2 yrs

U.S. and NATO Preparing for War in Europe
Favicon 
hotair.com

U.S. and NATO Preparing for War in Europe

U.S. and NATO Preparing for War in Europe
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
2 yrs

Daily Show Boos Former GOP Rep. Says Trump Isn't Hypocritical On Verdict
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Daily Show Boos Former GOP Rep. Says Trump Isn't Hypocritical On Verdict

Of all the late night comedians to react on Monday to former President Donald Trump’s conviction in New York, Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart was the only one to invite someone on to disagree with him about the appropriateness of the trial. That somebody was former Rep. Ken Buck, who, despite not being a Trump fan, pointed to several reasons why the trial was inappropriate and debunked Stewart’s arguments that Trump’s reactions make him a hypocrite as The Daily Show audience showered him with boos. Stewart asked, “You do have a frustration and complaints about the process of this Donald Trump trial. I think you called it shameful precedent? No. Shameful precedent? Is that correct?” Quibbling over details, Buck called it a “bad precedent,” which led Stewart to again ask, “Why do you think it is a precedent?”     Buck argued that Trump was targeted, and that is wrong, “It is a bad precedent because Lady Justice, blindfold, scale, sword, the image of Lady Justice… In this case, the blindfold came off. The blindfold was on because people shouldn't be targeted, and the system is flawed. I'm not saying that doesn't happen. People shouldn't be targeted because they are white or black, man or woman, Republican or Democrat, rich, poor. The blindfold came off and Donald Trump was targeted.” Stewart sought clarification, “Now how was he -- I'm curious how he was targeted.” Buck recalled, “So, Cyrus Vance was the previous D.A., declined this case. Alvin Bragg brought a case where the misdemeanor had that -- the statute of limitations had expired. Found a felony to extend that statute of limitations and brought the case.” Stewart interrupted, “Found a felony or there was a felony?” After Buck reiterated that Vance didn’t think there was, an unconvinced Stewart followed up, “I mean, many times, district attorneys will say, ‘I don't think the evidence gets to that standard’ but another district attorney might say, ‘Oh no, that’s a felony.’ He is doing that in order to manipulate an election. That’s a felony. Buck then directed Stewart’s memory to the fact that Vance was not alone, “So, this district attorney declined the case, Alvin Bragg declined the case and then brought the case. And there were significant political pressure to bring the case and that's something that our justice system needs to be insulated from.” Later in the 25-minute interview, Stewart alleged that given Trump’s history of wanting to put Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden in jail, he is being hypocritical and raised his voice in annoyance that Buck wasn’t seeing it that way, “I understand!, but do you get my point? The point is, this guy ran on Hillary is crooked and I'm going to put her in jail. And then with Biden, he said the Biden crime family is crooked and I'm going to put them in jail. And then a prosecutor in New York said, I have evidence you have committed a felony so we are going to put you on trial and he is like, ‘what? How dare you, sir!’" Buck claimed the two examples were “apples and oranges,” and after Stewart asked him to explain why, Buck did, to a stream of boos, “Because you've got someone in the political system and how many people in America believe what a politician says?” After Stewart told the audience to stop booing the guest, Buck continued, “A prosecutor walks into a courtroom and tells a lie, and that prosecutor loses a law license and probably goes to prison, so the difference between Alvin Bragg saying, 'I'm going after that person' and Donald Trump saying, 'that person should go to prison' is two different forums.” Stewart still wasn’t buying it, “Who has the more power? ... No, the president! And someone running for president. This is kind of a crazy argument you are making.” It was good that Stewart had someone on to disagree with him and that he rebuked the audience for booing, but he still could not appreciate that despite what he said on the campaign trail against Hillary Clinton, he did not actually do anything to her as president. Here is a transcript for the June 3 show: Comedy Central The Daily Show 6/3/2024 11:27 PM ET JON STEWART: You do have a frustration and complaints about the process of this Donald Trump trial. I think you called it shameful precedent? No. Shameful precedent? Is that correct? KEN BUCK: A what? STEWART: A shameful precedent? BUCK: I think it is a bad precedent. STEWART: Okay. BUCK: I was a prosecutor for 25 years. STEWART: Why do you think it is a precedent? BUCK: It is a bad precedent because Lady Justice, blindfold, scale, sword, the image of Lady Justice – STEWART: We went out in the '70s. I'm very familiar. BUCK Okay. In this case, the blindfold came off. The blindfold was on because people shouldn't be targeted, and the system is flawed. I'm not saying that doesn't happen. People shouldn't be targeted because they are white or black, man or woman, Republican or Democrat, rich, poor. STEWART: Right. BUCK: The blindfold came off and Donald Trump was targeted. STEWART: Now how was he -- I'm curious how he was targeted. BUCK: So, Cyrus Vance was the previous D.A., declined this case. STEWART: Okay. BUCK: Alvin Bragg brought a case where the misdemeanor had that -- the statute of limitations had expired.  STEWART: Right. BUCK: Found a felony to extend that statute of limitations and brought the case. STEWART: Found a felony or there was a felony?  BUCK: Well, there wasn't a felony for the previous district attorney. STEWART: I mean, many times, district attorneys will say "I don't think the evidence gets to that standard" but another district attorney might say, “Oh no, that’s a felony.” He is doing that in order to manipulate an election. That’s a felony. BUCK: So, this district attorney declined the case, Alvin Bragg— STEWART: Yes. BUCK: -- declined the case and then brought the case.  STEWART: Right. BUCK: And there were significant political pressure to bring the case and that's something that our justice system needs to be insulated from. … STEWART: I understand!, but do you get my point? The point is, this guy ran on Hillary is crooked and I'm going to put her in jail. And then with Biden, he said the Biden crime family is crooked and I'm going to put them in jail. And then a prosecutor in New York said, I have evidence you have committed a felony so we are going to put you on trial and he is like, "what? How dare you, sir!" What are we talking about? What is this? What are we doing? I'm about to go to jail, aren't I, sir? BUCK: Respectfully. STEWART: Please. BUCK: Apples and Oranges. STEWART: Why? BUCK:  Because you've got someone in the political system and how many people in America believe what a politician says?  STEWART: Sir,-- no, no, hey, hey, tickets are free. I will throw you out of here, respectfully. We’re having a conversation. This is not Rome. BUCK: A prosecutor walks into a courtroom and tells a lie, and that prosecutor loses a law license and probably goes to prison. STEWART: Exactly. BUCK: So, the difference between Alvin Bragg saying, “I'm going after that person” and Donald Trump saying, “that person should go to prison” is two different forums. STEWART: Who has the more power? BUCK: A candidate? STEWART: No, the president! And someone running for president. This is kind of a crazy argument you are making. BUCK: No, no, no. Let me finish. Bill Barr, great attorney general. Merrick Garland, great attorney general. Merrick Garland appointed special counsel and then puts the report out that says that Joe Biden should not be prosecuted because he is a kind gentleman with a bad memory, something to that effect. STEWART: Right. That's not what he said, but okay. BUCK: Well, it’s close. STEWART: What he said was, he would present to the jury as a kind old gentleman, which means, I don't think we can win this case because I think he is too sympathetic a figure.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
2 yrs

The View Has Suspicion COVID’s Origin ‘Wasn’t in this Country,’ Maybe a Lab
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

The View Has Suspicion COVID’s Origin ‘Wasn’t in this Country,’ Maybe a Lab

ABC News is not sending us their best. That much was obvious during Tuesday’s edition of The View when the Cackling Coven went to bat for Dr. Anthony Fauci following a House hearing the previous day. Mid their rambling, one of them shared their new sneaking suspicion that the origin of the COVID-19 virus lay outside the United States. Not only that, another heard rumors that it came from a laboratory somewhere. Staunchly racist and anti-Semitic co-host of ABC’s The View, Sunny Hostin (the descendant of slave owners) huffed that the House had “15 months of an investigation spending real taxpayer dollars” and “They say they cannot find out what happened here in the United States in terms of the origin of COVID.” It was then that Hostin floated her suspicion, which most Americans already understood for years by this point: “Well, maybe because the origin wasn't in this country. Maybe it was in another country and maybe they need to now start looking for – at other countries.” What made Hostin’s apparently new theory even more ridiculous was the fact that at no point was there a serious idea that it originated in any place other than Wuhan, China. But the dumb didn’t stop there. Co-host Joy Behar added that she heard it originated someplace more specific. “Didn’t they say it possibly came out of a lab?” she asked, to which Hostin responded with a “Yes.”     The irony of this exchange was that Behar had just finished mocking Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene for being stupid. “The other thing about it is that Marjorie Taylor Greene has no business being on a committee about science,” she proclaimed. “She's really dumb!” Earlier this year, Behar suggested it was NATO that defeated Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Just adding to the pile of stupidity, moderator Whoopi Goldberg seemingly went on a rant talking about Republican on the committee supposedly suggesting that the coronavirus wasn’t even real: GOLDBERG: Can we point this other thing out too? Real people died during this. This was not something people made up. This was not something that, you know, people were fooling around with. So, if you're concerned – because I listened to a bit of it. This is why I don't turn the television on, because all I want to do is put my foot through the TV because I don't understand real people died. BEHAR: Yeah. GOLDBERG: Families lost love – lost children, lost grandparents and you're questioning the validity of this thing saying people made it up. Of course, she provided no evidence of her claim. And she may not have even seen it herself since she huffed: “This is why I don't turn the television on…” Faux-conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin whined that Republicans were grilling her best friend. “This has my blood pressure like through the roof, today. Dr. Fauci is my friend. It was my honor to serve with him,” she said. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: ABC’s The View June 4, 2024 11:05:40 a.m. Eastern (…) JOY BEHAR: The other thing about it is that Marjorie Taylor Greene has no business being on a committee about science. First of all – [Laughter] This is the woman who says – [Cheers and applause] SUNNY HOSTIN: Yeah. BEHAR: Let me finish. She says that Jewish space lasers cause fires. That was the first thing. But first of all, she has skipped seven of the ten hearings. Okay? That's another point. But this is something that she said that I think is just hilarious. She has publicly questioned this, “If the Earth spins at a thousand miles an hour why can't we feel ourselves moving?!” [Laughter] She's really dumb! HOSTIN: Did she say that during a committee meeting? BEHAR: She's dumb. It's a quote. She's really stupid, you know, and so disrespectful to Dr. Fauci. And, by the way, science evolves. What you know on Monday, what -- WHOOPI GOLDBERG: Can change. BEHAR: Can change on Thursday. This was an evolving disease also we didn't really know anything about. SARA HAINES: It was changing as well. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: This has my blood pressure like through the roof, today. Dr. Fauci is my friend. It was my honor to serve with him. (…) 11:08:36 a.m. Eastern HOSTIN: And the other thing that I will just say is, 15 months of an investigation. We have real problems in this country. 15 months of an investigation spending real taxpayer dollars really, really just gets to me. GOLDBERG: Yeah. HOSTIN: And I think that people like Marjorie Taylor Greene and other people need to start doing the work of the people as opposed to try to send these messages. They say they cannot find out what happened here in the United States in terms of the origin of COVID. Well, maybe because the origin wasn't in this country. Maybe it was in another country and maybe they need to now start looking for – at other countries. BEHAR: Didn’t they say it possibly came out of a lab? HOSTIN: Yes. GOLDBERG: Can we point this other thing out too? Real people died during this. This was not something people made up. This was not something that, you know, people were fooling around with. So, if you're concerned – because I listened to a bit of it. This is why I don't turn the television on, because all I want to do is put my foot through the TV because I don't understand real people died. BEHAR: Yeah. GOLDBERG: Families lost love – lost children, lost grandparents and you're questioning the validity of this thing saying people made it up. (…)
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
2 yrs

Hunter Biden Trial Watch: ABC, NBC Play Up ‘Emotional’ Hunter on First Day of Trial
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Hunter Biden Trial Watch: ABC, NBC Play Up ‘Emotional’ Hunter on First Day of Trial

Following nauseatingly soft and sympathetic-seeking coverage on Monday morning and evening about the first Hunter Biden trial, Tuesday morning brought about even more of the same about the “emotional” First Son “getting support from the First Family” who’ve “rush[ed] to his defense”. The coverage disparity grew even more stark with a total of 23 minutes and 30 seconds through three news cycles vs. 49 minutes and 47 seconds at this point in the Trump trial. ABC’s Good Morning America again led the way with senior national correspondent Terry Moran boasting “[p]rosecutors say this is a simple case and it’s moving quickly.”     Noting a fully jury had been seated and Hunter “fac[ing] three felony gun charges” due to conduct in 2018, Moran tried to paint a picture of a sympathetic jury and implied Delaware’s small size could play to their advantage (click “expand”): MORAN: The jury that’s been seated for this case includes several people with family members who suffered from addiction or who own firearms, including a man whose father died by gun violence and his brother was sentenced to prison for drug crimes, and a woman whose sister was addicted to drugs and committed credit card fraud. ABC NEWS CONTRIBUTOR/LEGAL ANALYST BRYAN BUCKMIRE: A person like that, especially a foreperson, can be very sympathetic to Hunter Biden’s cause. MORAN: Later today, prosecutors are expected to call an FBI agent as their first witness who will present several of Hunter Biden’s text messages and excerpts from his memoir, part of the prosecution’s evidence that Biden knew he was an addict when he bought the gun, But Biden’s lawyers have argued that the form he had to fill out is confusing and so their client did not knowingly lie.In a state as small as Delaware, it wasn’t easy to find jurors who didn’t have a strong opinion of the president and his family. One perspective juror telling the judge, “you can’t swing a cat without hearing something” about the Biden’s.  Moran made sure to try to have viewers feel bad for Hunter: “Also in the courtroom, First Lady Jill Biden, Hunter’s sister Ashley, and his wife Alyssa. Hunter Biden at times growing emotional seeing his family at his side. He said in the past that they saved his life.” Like the good party mouthpiece that he is, Moran concluded with a rehashing of President Biden’s Monday statement in support of Hunter. Over on NBC’s Today, co-host Hoda Kotb’s lead in touted “First Lady Dr. Jill Biden making a surprise appearance in court on her birthday” with correspondent Ryan Nobles also playing up the loving family angle: “The President's son has pleaded not guilty and his famous family is now rushing to his defense.” “The President's son, Hunter Biden, facing a criminal trial and the prospect of jail time, getting support from the First Family right from the start. First Lady Jill Biden in the courtroom for jury selection, sitting just a few feet behind her son and whispering in his ear throughout the marathon day. His father, the President, issuing a rare statement addressing the case,” Nobles added. Only then did he move onto the jury selection proceedings and the fact this trial only came about when “a plea deal on separate tax charges fell apart, a process Republicans have attacked” and Democrats praising “the Bidens have respected the judicial process.” It is expected that a series of Biden family members will be with Hunter in court as the trial plays out,” Nobles emphasized as part of his conclusion. Tuesday’s CBS Mornings continued its straightforward reporting, although their segment dropped to a scant 83 seconds. Correspondent Scott MacFarlane kept it simple with what happened Monday at the trial, but made sure to puff up Jill’s appearance and the President’s Monday morning statement. After citing Hunter’s former lover/late brother’s widow is slated to be a witness for the prosecution and Hunter obviously denying the charges, MacFarlane quickly concluded: A deal to avert this trial collapsed at the last minute last year so they will proceed to opening statements this morning, Vlad, followed by the first witness. An FBI agent will testify about Hunter Biden’s text messages. Thanks to NewsBusters interns Sarah Butler, Mary Clare Waldron, and Michael Wnek for their assistance on the transcripts. To see the relevant transcripts for June 4, click here (for ABC), here (for CBS), and here (for NBC).
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
2 yrs

‘No one is above the law’ except for the president and his son
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

‘No one is above the law’ except for the president and his son

If you’ve been lucky enough to witness the left gloating over Donald Trump’s conviction, then you’ve probably heard the phrase “no one is above the law.” But it seems that might be far from the truth. “The only people we know that are above the law are the president and his son. They’re above the law, but nobody else,” Pat Gray says. While both the president and his son Hunter Biden have seemed to skirt the law on multiple occasions — Hunter is on trial this week. Hunter is currently charged with one count of making false statements in a firearm purchase, another count of making a false statement related to information required to be kept by a licensed firearm dealer, and one count of possession of a firearm by a person who is an unlawful user or addicted to a controlled substance. If the president’s son is found guilty, he could be facing a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison. “We’ll see what happens there,” Gray says, skeptical he’ll end up convicted. “And then he’s got the other one, the IRS one is in September,” Keith Malinak comments. While “no one is above the law” will continue to be parroted anyways, Malinak and Gray can’t help but notice that the justice system wasn’t exactly geared up to actually deliver justice in Trump’s case. They believe it was rigged to begin with. “I mean you’ve got people from the Department of Justice working with Alvin Bragg, you’ve got all the stuff about the judge’s daughter and the judge himself,” Malinak says. “This is third-world banana republic stuff here.” Want more from Pat Gray?To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
2 yrs

'Call of Duty' Pride bundle lets players simulate murder using trans flag-adorned guns and bullets
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

'Call of Duty' Pride bundle lets players simulate murder using trans flag-adorned guns and bullets

There have been multiple mass shootings executed, attempted, or at the very least planned by transvestites and LGBT radicals in recent years. In April, police arrested a trans-identifying high school student in Maryland who was allegedly plotting to shoot up classrooms full of elementary school children. In February, a gender-bending anti-Semite from El Salvador opened fire in Joel Osteen's Houston-based Lakewood Church. In January, a Nazi-supporting transvestite in Oregon was arrested after threatening to "go out in a blaze of glory." The same month, a trans-identifying teen stalked the halls of a school in Iowa, murdering a sixth-grader and wounding five others. Last year, a female transvestite murdered three children and three adults at a Christian school in Nashville, Tennessee. There was also the 2019 STEM School Highlands Ranch mass shooting in Colorado and the November 2022 massacre at a LGBT club in Colorado Springs. Trans-identifying suspects' share of mass public shootings nationwide over the 2018-2023 period is reportedly well over seven times their share of the population. Despite the apparent instability of this cohort, particularly when cross-sex hormones are factored in, a major video game developer has decided to pair LGBT propaganda with its popular first-person shooter — a move some critics figure serves to glorify violence in the activists' colors. Activision Blizzard's Call of Duty franchise is from far innocuous, having long courted controversy. For instance, one mission in the Infinity Ward-developed 2009 title, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, generated outrage with its "No Russian" mission, which had players fill the shoes of an undercover agent drawn into a false flag attack at a fictional Moscow-based airport. Instead of mowing down the usual waves of armed enemies, players were instead tasked with becoming terrorists and massacring multitudes of unarmed civilians. Activision Blizzard drew the ire of former CIA asset and Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega in 2012 for supposedly hurting his reputation in Call of Duty: Black Ops II. The woke company's controversies are not limited to gamifying terrorism and providing Latin dictators with a second act. In recent years, the DEI-captive company — which allegedly has diversity officers ensuring conformity and compliance for each video game — has worked to make sure its murder simulations are in alignment with the LGBT agenda. Twitch streamer Nick Kolcheff's suggestion last year that LGBT activists should "leave little children alone" prompted the company to remove his in-game character avatar, which had gone on sale the previous month in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II and in Warzone. Whereas last year, the company was breaking links to dissenting voices, this year the company rolled out LGBT propaganda in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 and in Warzone. — (@) In its Modern Warfare 3 season four announcement, Activision Blizzard alerted gamers to "seven free Pride weapon camos." 'We're proud to celebrate Pride Month by offering seven different Weapon camo variants.' "Call of Duty is for everyone, and we're proud to celebrate Pride Month by offering seven different Weapon camo variants, each representing the colors of the different LGBTQ+ flags," said the company. One gamer noted that some bullets in the game have been digitally painted in the colors of the transvestite flag. Bounding into Comics reported that the franchise has rolled out similar bundles before, having introduced LGBT-themed calling cards in 2022. However, this is apparently the first time that the company has applied Pride graphics directly to bullets. In addition to weapon camouflages and activist bullets, the free bundle includes Pride flag weapon stickers and weapon key chains. Former Blizzard Entertainment team lead and Red 5 Studios cofounder Mark Kern tweeted, "Um....did you think this one through? @Activision @CallofDuty We just started PRIDE and we already have the worst virtue signal of the year. If the news media actually covered what was happening with mass shootings, they would know. But they either don't know, or don't care." That Park Place noted that some critics have dubbed the Pride package the "Audrey Hale Operator update," in reference to the murderous transvestite who shot up the Covenant Christian School in Nashville. The activist publication PinkNews suggested, "As is somewhat expected sadly, the reaction to the update has been mixed as the Call of Duty community is not renowned for its LGBTQ+ support or allyship." While critics have suggested the Pride package is in bad taste, Forbes suggested it amounted to a "nice gesture to the LGBTQ Call of Duty community." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 25627 out of 56670
  • 25623
  • 25624
  • 25625
  • 25626
  • 25627
  • 25628
  • 25629
  • 25630
  • 25631
  • 25632
  • 25633
  • 25634
  • 25635
  • 25636
  • 25637
  • 25638
  • 25639
  • 25640
  • 25641
  • 25642

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund