The first polling comes from Polymarket. Polymarket is a decentralized prediction market platform; the “forecasts” are the percentage of people who have placed bets on who will win the election in November, not a survey. Joe Biden is moving to ban polling betting markets. BREAKING: Polymarket forecast shows former President Trump’s advantage growing to a […] The post Betting & Polling on Presidents in 2024 appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Special counsel Jack Smith is seeking a gag order against former President Donald Trump after he suggested the FBI was authorized to assassinate him. The request follows the revelation last week that the FBI was permitted to use “deadly force” in the 2022 raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. In response, Trump claimed FBI agents were “authorized to shoot me” and were “locked & loaded ready to take me out & put my family in danger.” Smith’s team rebuffed such claims in a court filing in the Florida-based classified documents case against Trump. Federal prosecutors said the statements “falsely” suggested law enforcement agents “were complicit in a plot to assassinate” Trump. The statements also “expose those agents, some of whom will be witnesses at trial, to the risk of threats, violence, and harassment,” they added. Smith’s team asked the court to restrain Trump from making public declarations that pose a serious “danger” to agents participating in the case. Prosecutors also noted that Trump’s lawyers object to the motion as they “do not believe that there is any imminent danger.” Neither Trump’s defense team nor Judge Aileen Cannon immediately responded to the request for a gag order. The FBI has insisted that the bureau was following “standard protocol” in the Mar-a-Lago search that has a policy statement “limiting the use of deadly force.” Trump’s re-election campaign spokesman, Steven Cheung, asserted in a statement that prosecutors were trying to meddle in the 2024 election. “Hacks and Thugs are obsessed with trying to deprive President Trump and all American voters of their First Amendment rights,” he said. “Repeated attempts to silence President Trump during the presidential campaign are blatant attempts to interfere in the election,” Cheung added. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Judges have implemented gag orders against Trump in a New York hush-money case and Smith’s 2020 election interference case against the former president. Trump has maintained his innocence in all of the charges he faces, including in a separate 2020 election interference case in Georgia. Just one of the four cases — the criminal matter in Manhattan — has gone to trial so far. Judge Cannon postponed the classified documents trial, which had been set for May 20, and has not selected a new date.

In recent news, an unexpected connection has been made between the political world and the world of rap music. As reported by multiple sources, a group of drill rappers who performed at a Trump rally in the Bronx have been indicted on charges of conspiracy to commit murder. The details of this case have sparked controversy and raised questions about the influence of politics on the entertainment industry. According to reports, the drill artists in question are known for their aggressive and often violent lyrics, which glorify gang activity and criminal behavior. Their music, which has gained a significant following in recent years, is often criticized for promoting a negative and dangerous lifestyle. However, it was their appearance at a Trump rally that brought them into the national spotlight. During Trump's rally yesterday the secret service made this big empty area around him presumably to protect him. Then he stood on stage to get the 'endorsement' of 2 rappers under indictment for 141 gang counts each including murder. There are a total of like 370 felony… pic.twitter.com/Pb3qOUDfXl — TheRealThelmaJohnson (@TheRealThelmaJ1) May 25, 2024 As footage of the rally circulated online, many were shocked to see the drill rappers performing on stage alongside the former president. Some saw it as an attempt by Trump to appeal to a younger, more diverse audience. Others saw it as a cynical ploy to garner attention and controversy. But no one could have predicted the turn of events that followed. Shortly after the rally, the drill artists were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit murder. The indictment alleges that they were involved in a gang-related shooting that took place just hours after their performance at the rally. The details of the case are still emerging, but it has sparked a heated debate about the role of politics in the music industry. Liberals are surprised that rappers are supporting Donald Trump. This proves that they don’t know anything about history. pic.twitter.com/rBYzWRA7Lv — Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) September 13, 2023 On one hand, some argue that the drill artists should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who may have been influenced by their music. They argue that artists have the right to express themselves freely, regardless of the political affiliations of their audience. However, others argue that the artists willingly associated themselves with a controversial figure like Trump and must now face the consequences. This case also raises questions about the responsibility of politicians when it comes to the artists they choose to associate with. Should Trump have vetted the drill rappers before inviting them to perform at his rally? Should politicians be held accountable for the actions of those they invite into their political sphere? These are complex and important questions that are sure to be debated in the coming weeks and months. In the end, the indictment of these drill rappers has shed light on the dangerous intersection of politics and music. It serves as a reminder that the power of both can have far-reaching consequences, for better or for worse. As this case continues to unfold, one thing is for certain: the connection between Trump rallies and drill rappers will not be easily forgotten. What are YOUR thoughts? We want to hear from you! Please comment below to join the discussion. The post Trump Rallies and Rappers: A Deadly Combination? The Shocking Indictment of Drill Artists After Bronx Rally appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

The commencement speaker at a Massachusetts university turned the gray rainy weather into a bright sunshiny day when he announced a surprise gift for every graduating student. Robert Hale Jr., the founder and CEO of Granite Telecommunications, accepted the UMass Dartmouth Chancellor’s Medal for his philanthropy work in the community—and, at the end of his […] The post Unforgettable Commencement Speaker Surprises Graduates With $1,000 Cash–Asking Them to Give Away Half (WATCH) appeared first on Good News Network.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The Biden administration is pushing for sweeping measures to combat the proliferation of nonconsensual sexual AI-generated images, including controversial proposals that could lead to extensive on-device surveillance and control of the types of images generated. In a White House press release, President Joe Biden’s administration outlined demands for the tech industry and financial institutions to curb the creation and distribution of abusive sexual images made with artificial intelligence (AI). A key focus of these measures is the use of on-device technology to prevent the sharing of nonconsensual sexual images. The administration stated that “mobile operating system developers could enable technical protections to better protect content stored on digital devices and to prevent image sharing without consent.” This proposal implies that mobile operating systems would need to scan and analyze images directly on users’ devices to determine if they are sexual or non-consensual. The implications of such surveillance raise significant privacy concerns, as it involves monitoring and analyzing private content stored on personal devices. Additionally, the administration is calling on mobile app stores to “commit to instituting requirements for app developers to prevent the creation of non-consensual images.” This broad mandate would require a wide range of apps, including image editing and drawing apps, to scan and monitor user activities on devices, analyze what art they’re creating and block the creation of certain kinds of content. Once this technology of on-device monitoring becomes normalized, this level of scrutiny could extend beyond the initial intent, potentially leading to censorship of other types of content that the administration finds objectionable. The administration’s call to action extends to various sectors, including AI developers, payment processors, financial institutions, cloud computing providers, search engines, and mobile app store gatekeepers like Apple and Google. By encouraging cooperation from these entities, the White House hopes to curb the creation, spread, and monetization of nonconsensual AI images. The initiative builds on previous efforts, such as the voluntary commitments secured by the Biden administration from major technology companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft to implement safeguards on new AI systems. Despite these measures, the administration acknowledges the need for legislative action to enforce these safeguards comprehensively. The administration’s proposals raise significant questions about privacy and the potential for mission creep. The call for on-device surveillance to detect and prevent the sharing of non-consensual sexual images means that personal photos and content would be subject to continuous monitoring and analysis. Through Photoshop and other tools, people have been able to generate images on their devices for decades but the recent evolution of AI is being used to now call for surveillance of the content people create. This could set a precedent for more extensive and intrusive forms of digital content scanning, leading to broader applications beyond the original intent. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Biden’s Bold Move to Combat AI Abuse Stirs Surveillance and Censorship Fears appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Hillary Clinton Blames Women Voters for her Loss to Trump

The Daily Mail reported that the United States military is actively preparing for war against China over tensions surrounding Taiwan. The report noted that marines from the U.S. and Philippines have been taking part in strange war games on a series of small islands in the area.The exercises have included deploying teams of marines from Chinook helicopters, assessing terrain, and even readying unarmed assault rifles. These actions appear to reveal the view of U.S. military leaders as China threatens to press into Taiwan.'It really is going to be us or them. … You do not want a world order where our adversaries try to define new norms.'The report noted that any serious conflict that breaks out between the U.S. and China could easily snowball into World War III. Both nations have a stockpile of nuclear weapons that could easily destroy the planet.However, the foundational tension is between China and Taiwan. Though Taiwan has made it known that it has no desire to be part of China, Chinese President Xi Jinping has expressed his desire to "reunify" Taiwan with mainland China. However, it is uncertain if and when the Chinese president will deploy an attack against the small country.The potential dispute also raises questions about the future of warfare, given that artificial intelligence has made its way on the scene. Blaze News reported last week "that software companies such as Palantir and Govini are behind the production and modernization of the most high-tech military weapon systems. Both companies were present at the second annual AI Expo for National Competitiveness in Washington to show off their developments to top military officials."Palantir's CEO and co-founder Alex Karp said: "The way to prevent a war with China is to ramp up not just Palantir, but defense tech startups that produce software-defining weapons systems that scare the living F out of our adversaries."Karp noted that the U.S. must stay ahead of its military opponents in the realm of AI."Our adversaries have a long tradition of being not interested in the rule of law, not interested in fairness, not interested in human rights and on the battlefield. It really is going to be us or them. … You do not want a world order where our adversaries try to define new norms. It would be very bad for the world, and it would be especially bad for America," Karp concluded.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!