Conservative CNN contributor Scott Jennings mocked chief media correspondent Brian Stelter's reporting that offered a new explanation for why "Morning Joe" hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski met with President-elect Donald Trump after years of unhinged criticisms against their former friend.Stelter reported that according to "two sources," Scarborough and Brzezinski wanted to meet with Trump because they were "credibly concerned that they could face governmental and legal harassment from the incoming Trump administration."As Stelter talked about his reporting, Jennings chuckled at the reasoning offered by the unnamed sources. Jennings pointed out the two hosts did not say that fear was the reason for the meeting when they revealed what happened at at Mar-a-Lago. 'So there is an environment, Scott, where there are understandable concerns.'“If that’s what happened and if that’s what they truly believed, why didn't they go on TV and say that? ‘We went down there to meet with the president to tell him that, hey, anyone who’s been critical of you, you know, you should treat us like journalists and not like the enemy,'" Jennings said."They didn’t go on TV and say that. They went on TV and portrayed it much differently. So what I hear you saying in your reporting is they had a motive that they weren’t willing to disclose to their audience, which I think should get them more scorn today than they were already getting to begin with," he continued."I understand some people might think this is paranoia inside MSNBC, for example. There are some people who think these fears I’m describing are way overblown. But then there’s others who are worried about prosecution. So there’s a wide range of concerns right now," Stelter explained.When Jennings asked what exactly people in the media industry are so afraid of, Stelter said, "Last week, Steve Bannon said, 'Lawyer up, you MSNBC producers.' So there is an environment, Scott, where there are understandable concerns."Scarborough and Brzezinski's sit-down with Trump at his South Florida estate has been met with laughter from MAGA supporters and intense criticism from the liberal camp. For years, especially in the days leading up to the election, both hosts used their program to claim Trump was very dangerous for the country.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Last week, Jason Whitlock made a bet that Deion Sanders’ Colorado Buffaloes will lose two of their last three games of the season. If he is proved wrong, however, Jason promised he would fly himself to a bowl game and cheer on Sanders’ team decked out in Buffaloes gear. After the Buffaloes' 49-24 victory over the Utah Utes last weekend, it looks like Whitlock might be packing his bags soon. “I'm being inundated over the weekend with people suggesting I owe Deion Sanders an apology,” he says. While he’s willing to admit that he was “wrong about what their record would be this year,” Jason is not willing to apologize. “I am going to be transparent and say I'm wrong, but I'm not apologizing,” he says. “After they lost to Nebraska, after they should have lost to Baylor, I was real confident that the wheels were going to fall off, and the wheels did not fall off. This team has improved throughout the course of the season,” he admits. “Hats off to Deion; hats off to Colorado.” However, Jason still doesn’t "respect the way Deion has gone about” running his football program and never has. From the gold chains he wears and the rappers he brings into the locker room to the flagrant materialism he promotes and his lack of humility — “none of it's consistent with my values; none of it's consistent with Christian values,” says Whitlock. He also doesn’t approve of the media’s celebration of Sanders when it’s not deserved. “You went 4-8 last year, and Sports Illustrated named you Sportsman of the Year; you were in last place in the Pack 12 last year, and Sports Illustrated called you Sportsman of the Year; ‘60 Minutes’ did two features on you in a year’s span,” Jason criticizes. On top of that, players like Travis Hunter begin to take on an “egomaniacal” demeanor under Deion’s leadership. “Travis Hunter has started to mimic Deion's attitude and Deion's lack of humility,” says Jason. Even still — if the Buffaloes win another game, Jason will keep true to his word and cheer on the Buffaloes at a bowl game this year. Next weekend when the team takes on the Kansas Jayhawks, Jason will know whether or not he’ll be ordering Colorado gear. Want more from Jason Whitlock?To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Lorie Smith is the owner of 303 Creative, a graphic design firm based in Colorado. While generally happy to produce work for any paying customer, Smith wanted to offer wedding-related services exclusively to straight couples because complicity in the celebration of homosexual unions would otherwise "compromise [her] Christian witness." Since Colorado's Anti-Discrimination Act would have forced her to do just that, she took the Democrat-run state to court — and won. Months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Smith's favor and a federal circuit court barred the state from enforcing the CADA's communication and accommodation clauses against the designer, Colorado officials have come to a settlement, agreeing Tuesday to pay a hefty sum to the guarantors of their defeat. "As the Supreme Court said, I'm free to create art consistent with my beliefs without fear of Colorado punishing me anymore," Smith said in a statement. "This is a win not just for me but for all Americans — for those who share my beliefs and for those who hold different views." Smith's original complaint filed in 2016 claimed that Colorado law stripped her and her organization "of the freedom to choose what messages to create and to convey in the marriage context." 'The First Amendment’s protections belong to all, not just to speakers whose motives the government finds worthy.' The complaint cited a section of the CADA that prohibits a person to refuse, withhold from, or deny the "full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages or accommodations of a place of public accommodation" to an individual on the basis of sexual preference, "gender identity," and "gender expression." Another clause in the CADA prohibits individuals from advertising that refusal. The lawsuit asked the U.S. District Court to restore the constitutional freedoms of Smith and 303 Creative "to speak their beliefs and not be compelled to speak messages contrary to those beliefs, and to ensure that other creative professionals in Colorado have the same freedoms." The case ultimately got kicked up the Supreme Court, which decided in June 2023 that the First Amendment bars Colorado from coercing a website designer to create content with which she disagrees. Justice Neil Gorsuch noted in the high court's majority opinion, "The First Amendment’s protections belong to all, not just to speakers whose motives the government finds worthy. In this case, Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance." "All manner of speech — from 'pictures, films, paintings, drawings, and engravings,' to 'oral utterance and the printed word' — qualify for the First Amendment’s protections; no less can hold true when it comes to speech like Ms. Smith’s conveyed over the Internet," wrote the conservative justice. "Consistent with the First Amendment, the Nation's answer is tolerance, not coercion," added Gorsuch. 'No government has the right to silence individuals for expressing these ideas.' Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissenting opinion for the leftist minority that the ruling was "profoundly wrong" and will "mark gays and lesbians for second-class status." Other social liberals similarly bemoaned the court's affirmation of free speech, including CNN talking head Van Jones, who said, "If you care about inclusion and equal opportunity and care about folks who don’t have much and are trying to make it today, this is a tragedy." Colorado Attorney General Philip Weiser, who unsuccessfully represented the state, said at the time that the ruling was "far out of step with the will of the American people and American values." According to Alliance Defending Freedom, the legal group that represented Smith, the Supreme Court's decision has already been cited nearly 1,000 times in court opinions, briefs, and various legal publications. Colorado's Civil Rights Division agreed this week to pick up the bill for the CADA's defanging, covering over $1.5 million in attorneys' fees. Weiser's office confirmed to the Denver Gazette the settlement over the fees but declined to comment. Kristen Waggoner, the CEO and president of Alliance Defending Freedom, stated, "The government can't force Americans to say things they don't believe, and Colorado officials have paid and will continue to pay a high price when they violate this foundational freedom." "For the past 12 years, Colorado has targeted people of faith and forced them to express messages that violate their conscience and that advance the government’s preferred ideology. First Amendment protections are non-negotiable," continued Waggoner. "Billions of people around the world believe that marriage is the union of one man and one woman and that men and women are biologically distinct. No government has the right to silence individuals for expressing these ideas or to punish those who decline to express different views." Smith expressed hope that "that everyone will celebrate the court's decision upholding this right for each of us to speak freely." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Triple-A games get much of the attention when it comes to games media, but there’s a varied and enchanting world of indie games that deserves just as much love. indie.io is a publishing platform that specializes in indie titles, and we’ve checked out their latest releases to find the best picks right now. Continue reading Four hot new indie games we’re playing this month MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best relaxing games, Best management games, Games like Stardew Valley

Saber Interactive is going to prohibit Space Marine 2 mods during online play soon, but the ban isn't exactly a bad thing. Not only has the team outlined exactly why mods need to go, but it's also explained how the modding community will actually get even more support than before. So if you're worried you'll stop seeing SM2 mods, or that this ban means you can't use them whatsoever, I've got some good news. Continue reading Space Marine 2 is banning mods from most online play, but there’s good news too MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Space Marine 2 review, Space Marine 2 system requirements , Best Warhammer 40k games

Unlike some other areas in the game, Room 206 in Silent Hill 2 Remake keeps you trapped until you figure out the combination of the Safe. Artistically, this is one of the best areas in the game, which adds to the unsettling environment and makes the place much creepier.

I'm pretty sure you've seen or at least know about Resident Evil's inventory management mechanics or even possibly Ace Attorney's back-and-forth court battles.

It has been four years since Microsoft set the bar extremely high for accessible realistic flight simulation.

Comcast Makes the Decision to Leave Behind Its Sinking Ship MSNBC, Rats and All

VIP Gold Show: Conspiracies? Ukraine? Elon Musk and X? With Guest Taylor C. Bradford