YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Survival Prepper
Survival Prepper  
32 w

CRISIS REPORT 11/19/24 ATACMS USED ON RUSSIA
Favicon 
prepping.com

CRISIS REPORT 11/19/24 ATACMS USED ON RUSSIA

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBcyBXNCsbx8clN2KSqZlaw/join Join Me Here As A Member here on YouTube ————————————————— TOPICS: economy, collapse, recession, prices, inflation, middle class, decline, ISRAEL, war, Palestine, Gaza, hostages ————————————————— The Modern Prepper book: https://www.amazon.com/Modern-Prepper-J-H-Zarate/dp/1617045535/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=1RDPD3FGY4OWP&keywords=the+modern+prepper&qid=1689569407&s=books&sprefix=the+modern+prepper%2Caps%2C120&sr=1-1 https://m.youtube.com/sponsor_channel/UCBcyBXNCsbx8clN2KSqZlaw?noapp=1 Thank you for supporting me! TRANSCRIPT ON SUBSTACK http://www.preppernow.substack.com https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Preppernow1 JOIN ME ON LOCALS FOR $3 A MONTH https://preppernow.locals.com JOIN ME ON SUBSCRIBESTAR FOR $3 A MONTH https://www.subscribestar.com/preppernow (TIPS/Donations) Cash App: cash.app/$PrepperNow ————————————————— SPONSORS: JASE MEDICAL JASE CASE! Follow The Link! https://www.jasemedical.com/?rfsn=6390154.fa795e4 PREPPER NERD OFFLINE ASSET SYSTEM This is my affiliate link: https://signup.prepper-nerd.com/referral/home/Wz1AWj2DlhRsMbko There are other links available at https://prepper-nerd.com/affiliate-asset-center/ OFFLINE version launch and $20 discount ends Wed 8/3/22 ————————————————— Learn canning with Voodoo Queen cindisevy@gmail.com ————————————————— TELEGRAM Channel https://t.me/crisisreport ————————————————— PrepperNow is an educator, prepper, father, husband and patriot. Working in academia, I have a B.A. in political science and an M.Ed. in education. I use the PrepperNow sites to posit my thoughts and post trustworthy material. www.preppernow.net ————————————————— L. I. N. K. S. ————————————————— (ODYSEE) https://odysee.com/@preppernow:61 ————————————————- (Truth Social): @preppernow ———————————————— (Twitter): https://www.Twitter.com/prepper_ now ———————————————— (GAB) https://gab.com/preppernow ————————————————— (RUMBLE) https://rumble.com/user/PrepperNow ————————————————— (MINDS) https://minds.com/preppernow ————————————————— (CRISIS REPORT ON ODYSEE): https://odysee.com/@preparednessnow:9 ————————————————— (CRISIS REPORT) https://YouTube.com/@crisisreport ————————————————— (EMAIL/INTEL) preppernow@protonmail.com ———————————————— (PREPPERNOW YT) https://youtube.com/channel/preppernow ————————————————— (Legal) FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copywright. #prepping #WAR #NEWS
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
32 w

Starship’s Booster (and Donald Trump) Make a Splash With Sixth Flight Test
Favicon 
www.universetoday.com

Starship’s Booster (and Donald Trump) Make a Splash With Sixth Flight Test

SpaceX’s Starship launch system went through its sixth flight test today, and although the Super Heavy booster missed out on being caught back at its launch pad, the mission checked off a key test objective with President-elect Donald Trump in the audience. Trump attended the launch at SpaceX’s Starbase complex in the company of SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who has been serving as a close adviser to the once and future president over the past few months. In a pre-launch posting to his Truth Social media platform, Trump wished good luck to “Elon Musk and the Great Patriots involved in this incredible project.” President Trump has arrived to watch the SpaceX launch with @elonmusk! ? pic.twitter.com/D5awPUUQTC— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) November 19, 2024 Starship is the world’s most powerful rocket, with 33 methane-fueled Raptor engines providing more than 16 million pounds of thrust at liftoff. That’s twice the power of the Saturn V rocket that sent Americans to the moon in the 1960s and early ’70s. The two-stage rocket stands 121 meters (397 feet) tall, with a 9-meter-wide (30-foot-wide) fairing. Super Heavy had an on-time launch at 4 p.m. CT (22:00 UTC) and was set up to fly itself back to the launch tower to be caught by the giant “Mechazilla” arms that were successfully used during last month’s flight test. But four minutes after liftoff, mission controllers said the booster had to be diverted instead to make a soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico. SpaceX didn’t immediately report the reason for the diversion. “It was not guaranteed that we would be able to make a tower catch today,” launch commentator Kate Tice said during today’s webcast. “So, while we were hoping for it … the safety of the teams and the public and the pad itself are paramount. We are accepting no compromises in any of those areas.” While the booster settled majestically into the Gulf, the Starship second stage — known as Ship for short — continued on a track that sent it as high as 190 kilometers (120 miles). A plush banana was placed in Ship’s cargo bay as a zero-gravity indicator, and Tice wore a T-shirt bearing the words “It’s Bananas!” to play off the lighthearted theme. Ship successfully relit one of its methane-fueled Merlin engines while in space, which was a key objective for today’s suborbital test. Relighting the engines under such conditions will be required in the future for Ship’s orbital maneuvers. A little more than an hour after launch, Ship’s engines fired for a final time to make a controlled splashdown in the Indian Ocean. The daylight visuals, plus other data collected during the flight, will help SpaceX’s team fine-tune Starship’s design for future tests. SpaceX plans to use Starship to accelerate deployment of its Starlink broadband satellites, as well as to fly missions beyond Earth orbit. The company has a $2.9 billion contract from NASA to provide a version of Starship that’s customized for lunar landings, starting as early 2026. And Musk has said Starship could take on uncrewed missions starting that same year — with the first crewed mission set for launch in 2028 if everything goes right. NASA Administrator Bill Nelson referred to those future flights in a message on Musk’s X social-media platform: Congrats to @SpaceX on Starship's sixth test flight. Exciting to see the Raptor engine restart in space—major progress towards orbital flight.Starship’s success is #Artemis’ success. Together, we will return humanity to the Moon & set our sights on Mars. pic.twitter.com/tuwpGOvT9S— Bill Nelson (@SenBillNelson) November 19, 2024 Check out these other postings tracking the progress of the flight test: With data and flight learnings as our primary payload, Starship’s sixth flight test once again delivered ? https://t.co/oIFc3u9laE pic.twitter.com/O6ZKThQRr6— SpaceX (@SpaceX) November 20, 2024 Super Heavy initiates its landing burn and softly splashes down in the Gulf of Mexico pic.twitter.com/BZ3Az4GssC— SpaceX (@SpaceX) November 19, 2024 Starship’s Raptor engine burn is complete and Starship has entered a coast phase pic.twitter.com/xJHlg2eDTs— SpaceX (@SpaceX) November 19, 2024 Live views of Earth from Starship pic.twitter.com/3rgsHSj2km— SpaceX (@SpaceX) November 19, 2024 Starship preparing to splash down in the Indian Ocean pic.twitter.com/EN9jibr07l— SpaceX (@SpaceX) November 19, 2024 Splashdown confirmed! Congratulations to the entire SpaceX team on an exciting sixth flight test of Starship! pic.twitter.com/bf98Va9qmL— SpaceX (@SpaceX) November 19, 2024 The post Starship’s Booster (and Donald Trump) Make a Splash With Sixth Flight Test appeared first on Universe Today.
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
32 w

Scientists Tested 8 Famous Cities. Only 1 Met The Standard For Tree Cover.
Favicon 
www.sciencealert.com

Scientists Tested 8 Famous Cities. Only 1 Met The Standard For Tree Cover.

Is your city green enough?
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
32 w

Nearly a Third of All Stars May Contain The Remains of Planets Like Earth
Favicon 
www.sciencealert.com

Nearly a Third of All Stars May Contain The Remains of Planets Like Earth

They barely had a chance.
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
32 w

The Science of Deload Weeks: Why Focusing on Rest Is Key to Fitness Gains
Favicon 
www.sciencealert.com

The Science of Deload Weeks: Why Focusing on Rest Is Key to Fitness Gains

Recovery time is essential.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

‘AMEN!’: Rand Paul praises DOGE for vow to slash spending
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

‘AMEN!’: Rand Paul praises DOGE for vow to slash spending

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

McEnany: Do Democrats REALLY care about 'democracy'?
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

McEnany: Do Democrats REALLY care about 'democracy'?

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

Saving The Country With Russ Vought
Favicon 
spectator.org

Saving The Country With Russ Vought

For someone destined to be such an indispensable man in the incoming Trump administration, it’s remarkable how few Americans outside of Washington know anything about Russ Vought. Remarkable, but perhaps unsurprising. Vought isn’t a politician. He’s a thinker. And the former director of the Office of Management and Budget in Donald Trump’s first term, who currently serves as the president of the Center For Renewing America but will likely return to government in some grand capacity (quite possibly in his old OMB job, or perhaps in something with respect to finance), is peculiar in that respect. Vought is a guy who runs a Washington think tank, but to hear him talk you quickly recognize that he’s not all that complimentary of most think tanks inside the Beltway. Neither is he particularly complimentary of the conservative movement — or, more particularly, the three-legged stool “fusionism” which signified its political rise in the back half of the 20th century, and particularly after Ronald Reagan rode it to American political dominance and victory over communism in the Cold War. In an entire 100-plus-minute interview with Tucker Carlson that was published on Monday, Vought never once mentioned the word “Bush,” but it’s very obvious based on that interview that he’s completely opposed to the establishment “conservative” mindset I’ve called Bush Republicanism. And ready to bury it once and for all. Interestingly, Vought, who describes our current moment as not quite midnight for America but more like 11:59 p.m., and speaks repeatedly about the need to “save the country,” places great emphasis on retracing conservatism’s steps in an effort to find where it went wrong. He says that at his organization’s events, attendees will find themselves being given books — old books, in fact, like Whittaker Chambers’s Witness or Pat Buchanan’s various works. Vought’s conservatism — what I would call, and have repeatedly called, Revivalism — is the kind that the Washington establishment can’t stand. But it turns out that the American people like it a whole lot better than anything the elite political class has to offer. It’s what the public just voted for, in fact. In the Carlson interview, Vought lends a good deal of intellectual and policy heft to Donald Trump’s re-ascension to the presidency, and he frames Trump’s challenge in ways the elite will see as a binary, existential conflict. Reagan framed a not-dissimilar conflict, then with the Soviets, as “we win, they lose.” Listening to Vought, that’s how it’s going to have to go with the Deep State. He talks about the necessity of learning quickly how to manipulate the system to permanently alter, if not destroy, the abusive corruption it now inflicts on society. About how elected officials must retake power from unelected bureaucrats. The president must take it from the corrosive fourth branch of government in the agencies using various tools to manage employment of bureaucrats, and Congress must take it from bureaucrats by writing legislation that clearly delineates what power the agencies have and what power they don’t. In the aftermath of Supreme Court decisions that have done away with Chevron deference, this seems obvious. Interestingly, though, Vought also talks about the president retaking power from Congress, and in particular the power to impound funds appropriated by Congress but are neither needed nor wanted. He notes this was a long-standing tool of American presidents that was taken away in the post-Watergate era, the effect of which being that the federal budget has skyrocketed out of control ever since. Reorienting the American government toward accountability, transparency, and a lighter footprint on American life is a clear passion of Vought’s, but interestingly, he advocates using the full power afforded to the executive branch by the Constitution in order to do that. What didn’t come up in the Carlson interview was Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation-led playbook for a second Trump administration that Vought wrote a chapter for. His was titled “Executive Office of the President,” and the Center for Renewing America is listed as a contributing organization to the 922-page document. Trump’s campaign disavowed Project 2025, but it’s fairly clear that was just an effort to deflect something the Democrats were trying to weaponize against him. Essentially, Project 2025 is Fight Club. And the first rule of Fight Club is that you don’t talk about Fight Club. Politically, it’s a waste of time to try to defend against Democrat attacks on it; none of those were made in good faith, and basically all of them were distortions and untruths. So deny you’re doing any of it while speaking generally in favor of its aims by another name, diffuse the issue during the campaign, and then implement as many of its recommendations as possible once in office. Everybody knew this was happening. Nobody was particularly angry about it, because everybody knew the attacks on Project 2025 were typical campaign fearmongering. And what Vought clearly understands, as does Trump’s team, is that the change they represent doesn’t scare the American people much but it absolutely terrifies the Washington elites. Which he expresses as a good thing. In the interview, Vought uses the word exhilarating several times in talking about the proposed Trump cabinet and the impending structural reforms of the federal government that await. I’ve said that the world changed on Nov. 5 and that we’re now officially through with the New Deal/Great Society era of American politics. Watch Vought’s Carlson interview and you’ll get a solid glimpse into what comes next. READ MORE from Scott McKay: Shapiro Has a Major Opportunity In Stopping the Pennsylvania Steal Five Quick Things: Trump’s Cabinet Picks Are a Political Sea Change Does Government Really Regulate Industry, or Is It the Other Way Around? The post Saving The Country With Russ Vought appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

Rejuvenating the Monroe Doctrine
Favicon 
spectator.org

Rejuvenating the Monroe Doctrine

James Holmes, the J.C. Wylie Chair of Maritime Strategy at the U.S. Naval War College, reminds us in The National Interest that the Monroe Doctrine is under challenge by the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) and China’s Mahanian sea power strategists. Holmes is the co-author (with Toshi Yoshihara) of China’s Naval Strategy in the 21st Century: The Turn to Mahan. Mahan is, of course, Alfred Thayer Mahan, the great American historian and sea power strategist of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Back in 2008, Holmes and Yoshihara warned us in that book that, “Mahan’s writings and theories on sea power furnish an indispensable framework for understanding China’s emerging maritime strategy.” So it has come to pass, as China seeks to use sea power in its broadest sense “in search of economic prosperity and martial clout.” That is what Xi Jinping was doing in Lima, Peru, last week, where he participated in a virtual ceremonial ribbon-cutting for the deepwater Chancay port, which was financed by a $1.3 billion investment from China. This is the latest venture in China’s Belt and Road Initiative in which China uses its economic power to enhance its global geopolitical footprint. Xi said, “China is willing to work with the Peruvian side to take the Chancay project as a starting point to forge a new maritime-land corridor between China and Latin America.” NBC News describes Chancay as a “megaport” that China intends to use as a “major shipping hub between Asia and South America.” Holmes, in his National Interest piece, describes the port as a “lodgment for Chinese sea power on this side of the Pacific Ocean.” China’s Mahan was Admiral Liu Huaqing, who served as commander of the PLAN from 1982 to 1987, and led a major shift in Chinese naval strategy from “Coastal Defense” to “Offshore Defense.” Holmes and Yoshihara called Liu “a central figure in China’s dramatic turn to the seas.” They cited Liu’s memoirs in which he favorably referenced Mahan’s works as furnishing a theoretical weapon for great powers to expand and seek hegemony. Holmes and Yoshihara also noted that Chinese naval strategists in the 21st century looked to Mahan for geopolitical guidance. Chinese strategists interpret sea power in broad Mahanian terms that, Holmes notes, include trade, supply chains, merchant vessels, diplomacy, and access to overseas ports. Holmes calls this activity “maritime entrepreneurship.” And Xi has taken this activity to the Western Hemisphere in an unambiguous challenge to Pres. James Monroe’s doctrine. The brains behind the Monroe Doctrine, which was announced by Monroe in December 1823, was Secretary of State John Quincy Adams. The doctrine sought to prevent further foreign (in those days European) colonization in the Western Hemisphere. Until the Obama administration, every American president invoked the doctrine as a geopolitical necessity for U.S. security. In 2013, Obama’s Secretary of State John Kerry declared that the Monroe Doctrine was dead. Obama’s diplomacy served as an invitation to China to exert economic and political influence in the Western Hemisphere. China was quick to grasp the implications of this American retreat. During his first term as president, Donald Trump sought to revive the Monroe Doctrine by announcing at the U.N. that the United States “reject[s] the interference of foreign nations in this hemisphere.” Later, Trump’s national security adviser told a Miami audience that “the Monroe Doctrine is alive and well.” (READ MORE: With Trump’s Presidency, the China Hawks Are Back) Holmes hopes that a second Trump administration and a GOP-led Congress will be “mindful of [China’s] hemispheric challenges.” He reaches back to another great American geopolitical thinker, Nicholas Spykman, who, he writes, “cautioned Americans not to assume Latin America was their natural preserve.” Spykman was writing when Hitler’s Germany sought to expand its influence in Latin America. China today poses a much greater hemispheric threat than Germany ever did in the 1940s. Holmes’ article reminds us that the geopolitical competition with China is not limited to the Western Pacific or even the greater Indo-Pacific — it is global. It will define world politics for the foreseeable future. READ MORE from Francis Sempa: Is Biden Trying to Start World War III Before Trump Takes Office? With Trump’s Presidency, the China Hawks Are Back Satan Never Sleeps in Communist China The Growing Irrelevance of the Mainstream Media The post Rejuvenating the Monroe Doctrine appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
32 w

The Time Is Definitely Right for Trump’s Reciprocal Zero-for-Zero Tariff Plan
Favicon 
spectator.org

The Time Is Definitely Right for Trump’s Reciprocal Zero-for-Zero Tariff Plan

When Pres. Donald Trump took office in 2017, he promised free, fair, and reciprocal trade, including deals to open markets to U.S. exports and bring more investment to the United States. Unfortunately, his chief trade advisors, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Peter Navarro, and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, overlooked the “free” part of Trump’s pledge. Instead of opening foreign markets to U.S. exports, their policies closed them. Instead of working to bring more job-creating investment to the United States, they characterized foreign investment as conquest by purchase and a transfer of wealth. Lighthizer even endorsed a capital access fee — aka a tax — to discourage foreign investment. Their tariff schemes were an undisputed failure. Lighthizer’s Section 301 tariffs on China alone have cost American manufacturers and families $235 billion and counting. That’s the equivalent of nearly $1,800 for every American household. Rather than changing its unfair practices as Lighthizer expected, China instead imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, as pointed out in Trump’s 2019 Economic Report of the President. Americans will soon learn whether Trump is ready to try something different. As he wrote in The Art of the Deal, “I also try to protect myself by being flexible. I never get too attached to one deal or one approach.” Let’s hope so. During his first term, Trump proposed a smarter approach than the one pursued by Lighthizer: reciprocal zero-tariff trade deals to eliminate unfair foreign trade barriers and boost U.S. manufacturing. Early in his first term, Trump specifically called for dropping all barriers to trade between the United States and the European Union. Trump adviser Larry Kudlow repeatedly reiterated that Trump saw tariff threats as a negotiating tool to get to zero tariffs, in contrast to some of his advisors who pushed tariffs as an end goal. There is ample precedent in U.S. history for Trump’s reciprocal zero-tariff approach. Our country’s first commercial treaties, with France and Great Britain, called for equality, reciprocity, and the avoidance of burdensome preferences. In the early 1800s, Congress endorsed agreements based on general and reciprocal abolition of all discriminating duties. In 1890, the McKinley Tariff Act eliminated tariffs on goods like sugar and tea. Congress hoped that Pres. William McKinley could use the threat of reinstating them to secure reciprocal tariff cuts from our trading partners. Following the Great Depression, U.S. trade negotiations were governed by a succession of reciprocal trade agreement acts. The resulting deals significantly reduced foreign trade barriers. The average world tariff for countries participating in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade coming out of World War II was 22 percent. As of 2017, the average world tariff rate was just 2.6 percent, a remarkable 88 percent cut. Trump embracing reciprocal zero-tariff trade deals would be a welcome change from the Biden administration’s trade policies. Agreements pursued by Biden explicitly failed to seek tariff cuts. The Biden administration even called this a feature of its approach, not a bug. Instead, it pursued international regulations designed to promote equity, women’s empowerment, and inclusivity. Trump’s zero-tariff deals would reject this model of complex, bloated agreements governing noneconomic issues. Trump often refers to McKinley’s tariff policies. According to McKinley, “Most desirable from every standpoint of national interest and patriotism is the effort to extend our foreign commerce.” Trump can leave a lasting legacy by pursuing reciprocal zero-for-zero trade deals that extend our commerce abroad and combat high prices at home. Bryan Riley is the director of the Free Trade Initiative at the National Taxpayers Union. READ MORE: Tariffs, Cars, and the Whiskey War The Spectacle Ep. 150: Rand Paul on Violence Against Trump, Balancing Budgets, and Tackling Tariffs Time for a Teachable Moment on Tariffs The post The Time Is Definitely Right for Trump’s Reciprocal Zero-for-Zero Tariff Plan appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 3218 out of 56666
  • 3214
  • 3215
  • 3216
  • 3217
  • 3218
  • 3219
  • 3220
  • 3221
  • 3222
  • 3223
  • 3224
  • 3225
  • 3226
  • 3227
  • 3228
  • 3229
  • 3230
  • 3231
  • 3232
  • 3233

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund